DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Melodie Velasco Stenger Dissertation.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Melodie Velasco Stenger Dissertation.Pdf The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts ARISTOTLE’S IMAGINATION AND THE BIRTH OF NAMELESS THINGS A Dissertation in Philosophy by Melodie Velasco Stenger © 2016 Melodie Velasco Stenger Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2016 The dissertation of Melodie Velasco Stenger was reviewed and approved* by the following: Christopher P. Long Dean of Arts and Letters, Michigan State University Special Member Mark Sentesy Assistant Professor of Philosophy Committee Chair and Dissertation Adviser Vincent Colapietro Liberal Arts Research Professor of Philosophy Christopher Moore Assistant Professor of Philosophy Thomas O. Beebee Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Comparative Literature and German Amy Allen Liberal Arts Research Professor of Philosophy Head of the Department of Philosophy *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract Aristotle’s investigation of the soul in the De Anima challenges his understanding of nature and the natural, complicating his distinctions between naturalistic and logical methodologies, between perceptible and intelligible, and between physics and metaphysics. At the heart of each of these distinctions is his understanding of phantasia. By attending in the De Anima to what Aristotle says about the imagination, but also to how he uses imagination, this project aspires to sketch out a naturalistic account of phantasia. It takes seriously Aristotle’s suggestion that phantasia is some sort of motion and discloses a unified image of Aristotelian phantasia as the kinēsis by which the intelligible comes to be. Phantasia is the motion by which the entelecheiae of the extended magnitudes of the perceptible realm come to be the analogical ‘perceptible things,’ the phantasmata, of the intelligible realm. This understanding not only attempts to account for phantasia’s seemingly contradictory appearances within the De Anima, but, by means of a metaphoric extension, also considers phantasia’s roles in the Rhetoric, the Poetics, and the De Memoria. Here, the “metaphoric phantasia” of DA III.3 428a is found to be the motion by which the intelligible is “brought before the eyes” and made clear and distinct. It is the motion by which the intelligible becomes perceptible, and is thus the motion by which metaphors themselves come to be. And insofar as such “bringing before the eyes” relies on one’s ability to present the entelecheia of a given thought, metaphoric phantasia can also be uncovered as the motion by which apophantical naming itself occurs. “Metaphoric phantasia” thus makes room for a creative, poetic imagination within Aristotle’s thought, and its link to phantasia per se means that a physics of phantasia is also a physics of language, is an account of how a thing gets to be said as what it is. Phantasia, metaphoric and otherwise, can thus be seen to account for the birth of nameless things. iii Table of Contents List of Abbreviations................................................................................................... vi List of Tables.............................................................................................................. vii List of Figures ........................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... ix Chapter One: The Unfolding of Entelecheia..................................................................1 Phantasia by way of Entelecheia: Alternate Intelligibility........................................................................4 Phantasia by way of Entelecheia: Living, Ensouled Bodies......................................................................9 Table I.1: Distribution of “Entelecheia” and “Energeia” in Aristotle’s Works..............................10 Aristotle’s Method(s).............................................................................................................................................21 The Naturalist, Intelligible ‘Space,’ and Spatial Intelligibility..............................................................30 Chapter Two: The Appearing of Phantasmata............................................................ 49 First Question: Appearances and Images, Presentations and Representations..........................50 Second Question: Aisthēmata and Noēmata................................................................................................60 Third Question: Truth and Falsity ...................................................................................................................67 Concluding Remarks..............................................................................................................................................80 Chapter Three: The Appearing of Phantasia............................................................... 85 What Sort of Thing Is Phantasia? .....................................................................................................................88 Phantasia as Dunamis............................................................................................................................................94 Table III.1: Polansky’s Summary of Soul’s “Capacities and Subcapacities” ................................ 103 Table III.2: Wedin’s Ingredients of Perception and Imagination .................................................... 105 Kinēsis, Dunamis, Hexis: De Anima II.5......................................................................................................... 112 Figure III.1: First and Second Entelechies, First and Second Dunameis....................................... 117 Figure III.2: First and Second Dunameis, Retranslated....................................................................... 117 Figure III.3: First Dunamis and Entelechy, Second Dunamis and Entelechy.............................. 118 Figure III.4: First Dunamis and Entelechy, Second Dunamis and Entelechy, Condensed ..... 118 Figure III.5: “Speaking of being acted upon and being moved as though they were the same as being-at-work.”................................................................................................................................................ 121 Chapter Four: The Becoming of the Intelligible ........................................................ 137 Phantasia as the Kinēsis of Genesis: Physics III.1..................................................................................... 138 The Perceptible and the Intelligible: De Anima III.8 ............................................................................. 148 Figure IV.1: First and Second Entelechies, First and Second Dunameis....................................... 156 Figure IV.2: First Dunamis and Entelechy, Second Dunamis and Entelechy .............................. 156 Figure IV.3: First Dunamis and Entelechy of Knowledge Dependent on Second Dunamis and Entelechy of Perception ..................................................................................................................................... 157 Phantasia as Genesis: Active or Passive...................................................................................................... 163 Phantasia as Genesis: Active and Passive................................................................................................... 174 Chapter Five: The Saying of Logos............................................................................ 189 Walking Towards Logos: Rational/Deliberative Phantasia............................................................... 194 iv Walking Towards Logos: Phantasmata as ‘Aisthēmata’: De Anima III.7....................................... 201 Table V.1: Comparison of Analogs from III.7’s Key Analogical Passage, Incomplete ............. 206 Table V.2: Comparison of Analogs from III.7’s Key Analogical Passage, Complete................. 213 Phasis and Logos Apophantikos...................................................................................................................... 215 Phanai and Phantasia......................................................................................................................................... 223 Chapter Six: The Birth of Nameless Things ............................................................... 235 Metaphoric Phantasia and “Bringing Before the Eyes” ....................................................................... 237 “Bringing Before the Eyes” and Metaphor ................................................................................................ 249 Figure VI.1: Most’s Reduction of Aristotelian Metaphor Types to Analogical Metaphor...... 251 Figure VI.2: Metaphor Formation, Step One: Ratio Building ............................................................ 252 Figure VI.3: Metaphor Formation, Step Two: Substitution................................................................ 253 Ana-Logos, Kata Logos: Spatial Intelligibility and Nameless Things.............................................. 263 “Something Like the Middle Voice” and The Life of Words ............................................................... 274 Bibliography ............................................................................................................ 285 v List of Abbreviations De Anima DA De Caelo DC De Generatione Animalium GA De Generatione
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selections from Joe Sachs's Introduction to His Translation of Aristotle's Metaphysics (Sachs's Extensive Footnotes Have Been Omitted from This Selection.)
    Selections from Joe Sachs's Introduction to His Translation of Aristotle's Metaphysics (Sachs's extensive footnotes have been omitted from this selection.) How and Why this Version Differs from Others We cannot give an accurate summary of Aristotle's conclusions about the way things are unless we have some way to translate his characteristic vocabulary, but if our decision is to follow the prevalent habits of the most authoritative interpreters, those conclusions crumble away into nothing. By way of the usual translations, the central argument of the Metaphysics would be: being qua being is being per se in accordance with the categories, which in turn is primarily substance, but primary substance is form, while form is essence and essence is actuality. You might react to such verbiage in various ways. You might think, I am too ignorant and untrained to understand these things, and need an expert to explain them to me. Or you might think, Aristotle wrote gibberish. But if you have some acquaintance with the classical languages, you might begin to be suspicious that something has gone awry: Aristotle wrote Greek, didn't he? And while this argument doesn't sound much like English, it doesn't sound like Greek either, does it? In fact this argument appears to be written mostly in an odd sort of Latin, dressed up to look like English. Why do we need Latin to translate Greek into English at all? At all the most crucial places, the usual translations of Aristotle abandon English and move toward Latin. They do this because earlier translations did the same.
    [Show full text]
  • HEXIS and GRACE: the FORMATION of SOULS at PORT ROYAL and ELSEWHERE INTRODUCTION N the Middle of the Seventeenth Century The
    RICH COCHRANE HEXIS AND GRACE: THE FORMATION OF SOULS AT PORT ROYAL AND ELSEWHERE INTRODUCTION n the middle of the seventeenth century the Cistercian convent known as Port Royal became simultaneously, and connectedly, a centre of pedagogic innovation and religious I controversy. Its “little schools,” which educated (separately) both girls and boys, are now famous largely for the publication of two textbooks, one on logic and another on grammar, which have been seen by some commentators as early documents of the Enlightenment.1 These were associated exclusively with the education of the boys. The girls’ education, however, also produced an important document: the Rule for Children of Jacqueline Pascal,2 who directed the girls’ school at Port Royal des Champs (the old site that lay outside Paris) during the 1650s. This paper gives an interpretation of this text and the educational practice it records and suggests not only that this practice has deep roots in the Christian tradition but also that it continues to exert a powerful, albeit indirect, influence on our thinking about education today. I begin by discussing in some detail the related notions of hexis and divine grace, which in Augustine come together to create a doctrine that had a profound influence on Jansen and his followers. I then proceed to read Pascal’s Rule in the light of this doctrine. I show that the purpose of the regime she supervised was the preparation of the soul to receive grace, making it an early example of a formative pedagogy as opposed to an “informative” one. My aim is to understand the theory embedded in the pedagogic practices Pascal describes rather than to import a theory of practice from elsewhere.3 The extent to which the roots of Pascal’s pedagogy 1 Michel Foucault, The Order of Things (London: Routledge, 1989), 46; 67 et passim; 104 et passim; 195.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2013 The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle Robin Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Robin, "The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 143. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STOICS AND THE PRACTICAL: A ROMAN REPLY TO ARISTOTLE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 BY Robin Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Introduction……………………..............................................................................................................p.i Chapter One: Practical Knowledge and its Others Technê and Natural Philosophy…………………………….....……..……………………………….....p. 1 Virtue and technical expertise conflated – subsequently distinguished in Plato – ethical knowledge contrasted with that of nature in
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle: Movement and the Structure of Being
    Aristotle: Movement and the Structure of Being Author: Mark Sentesy Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/2926 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2012 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Philosophy ARISTOTLE: MOVEMENT AND THE STRUCTURE OF BEING a dissertation by MARK SENTESY submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 © copyright by MARK SENTESY 2012 Aristotle: Movement and the Structure of Being Mark Sentesy Abstract: This project sets out to answer the following question: what does movement contribute to or change about being according to Aristotle? The first part works through the argument for the existence of movement in the Physics. This argument includes distinctive innovations in the structure of being, notably the simultaneous unity and manyness of being: while material and form are one thing, they are two in being. This makes it possible for Aristotle to argue that movement is not intrinsically related to what is not: what comes to be does not emerge from non‐being, it comes from something that is in a different sense. The second part turns to the Metaphysics to show that and how the lineage of potency and activity the inquiry into movement. A central problem is that activity or actuality, energeia, does not at first seem to be intrinsically related to a completeness or end, telos. With the unity of different senses of being at stake, Aristotle establishes that it is by showing that activity or actuality is movement most of all, and that movement has and is a complete end.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009
    International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009 Editorial Werner Fricke, Øyvind Pålshaugen 5 Popular Education and Participatory Research: Facing Inequalities in Latin America Danilo R. Streck 13 Organizing – A Strategic Option for Trade Union Renewal? Klaus Dörre, Hajo Holst, Oliver Nachtwey 33 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby 68 Opening to the World through the Lived Body: Relating Theory and Practice in Organisation Consulting Robert Farrands 114 Book review Olav Eikeland (2008): The Ways of Aristotle. Aristotelian phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research reviewed by Ole Fogh Kirkeby 144 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby In this article, the Greek concept of phronesis is analyzed on the basis of its philosophical roots, and the indispensability of its strong normative content is emphasized. This creates a distance to most of the recent under- standing of phronesis as prudence, and hence as practical wisdom with a pragmatic and strategic content. The strong dilemmas created by the nor- mative background of real phronesis present management and leadership as a choice in every situation. From this foundation, phronesis is inter- preted as primarily the sense of the event, and an alternative concept of the event is developed. The presentation of the event also demands a theory of the relation of mind and matter, and hence of the body in the event. This is achieved under inspiration from Stoic philosophy. With this in mind, the more serious approaches to practical wisdom: phronesis as determinant of meta-concepts of research; phronesis as a liberating organizational strategy of learning; phronesis as a strategy of knowledge management; phronesis as a narrative strategy; and phronesis as the capacity of the leader, are presented and analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger's Reading of Aristotle's Concept of Pathos
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Spring 2012 Heidegger’s Reading of Aristotle’s Concept of Pathos Marjolein Oele University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/phil Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Oele, Marjolein, "Heidegger’s Reading of Aristotle’s Concept of Pathos" (2012). Philosophy. Paper 18. http://repository.usfca.edu/phil/18 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HEIDEGGER’S READING OF ARISTOTLE’S CONCEPT OF PATHOS Marjolein Oele, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Philosophy University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117-1080 Email: [email protected] Tel: 415-455-9030 . HEIDEGGER’S READING OF ARISTOTLE’S CONCEPT OF PATHOS Abstract This paper takes as its point of departure the recent publication of Heidegger’s lecture course Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy and focuses upon Heidegger’s reading of Aristotle’s concept of pathos. Through a comparative analysis of Aristotle’s concept of pathos and Heidegger’s inventive reading of this concept, I aim to show the strengths
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Mimesis of Orality
    Translating mimesis of orality: Robert Frost’s poetry in Catalan and Italian Marcello Giugliano TESI DOCTORAL UPF / ANY 2012 DIRECTORS DE LA TESI Dra. Victòria Alsina Dr. Dídac Pujol DEPARTAMENT DE TRADUCCIÓ I CIÈNCIES DEL LLENGUATGE Ai miei genitori Acknowledgements My first thank you goes to my supervisors, Dr. Victòria Alsina and Dr. Dídac Pujol. Their critical guidance, their insightful comments, their constant support and human understanding have provided me with the tools necessary to take on the numerous challenges of my research with enthusiasm. I would also like to thank Dr. Jenny Brumme for helping me to solve my many doubts on some theoretical issues during our long conversations, in which a smile and a humorous comment never failed. My special thanks are also for Dr. Luis Pegenaute, Dr. José Francisco Ruiz Casanova, and Dr. Patrick Zabalbeascoa for never hiding when they met me in the corridors of the faculty or never diverting their eyes in despair. Thank you for always being ready to give me recommendations and for patiently listening to my only subject of conversation during the last four years. During the project, I have had the privilege to make two research stays abroad. The first, in 2009, in Leuven, Belgium, at the Center for Translation Studies (CETRA), and the second in 2010 at the Translation Center of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, USA. I would like to give a heartfelt thank you to my tutors there, Dr. Reine Meylaerts and Dr. Maria Tymoczko respectively, for their tutoring and for offering me the chance to attend classes and seminars during my stay there, converting that period into a fruitful and exciting experience.
    [Show full text]
  • King Lear and the Winter’S Tale 135 Sanford Budick
    Entertaining the Idea shakespeare, philosophy, and performance Edited by Lowell Gallagher, James Kearney, and Julia Reinhard Lupton ENTERTAINING THE IDEA: SHAKESPEARE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PERFORMANCE THE UCLA CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY SERIES ENTERTAINING THE IDEA SHAKESPEARE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PERFORMANCE Edited by Lowell Gallagher, James Kearney, and Julia Reinhard Lupton Published by the University of Toronto Press in association with the UCLA Center for Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Studies and the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library © The Regents of the University of California 2021 utorontopress.com Printed in the U.S.A. ISBN 978-1-4875-0743-5 (cloth) ISBN 978-1-4875-3624-4 (EPUB) ISBN 978-1-4875-3623-7 (PDF) ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Title: Entertaining the idea: Shakespeare, philosophy, and performance / edited by Lowell Gallagher, James Kearney, and Julia Reinhard Lupton. Names: Gallagher, Lowell, 1953– editor. | Kearney, James (James Joseph), editor. | Lupton, Julia Reinhard, 1963– editor. Series: UCLA Clark Memorial Library series ; 29. Description: Series statement: UCLA/Clark Memorial Library series ; no. 29 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: Canadiana (print) 20200255657 | Canadiana (ebook) 2020025572X | ISBN 9781487507435 (hardcover) | ISBN 9781487536244 (EPUB) | ISBN 9781487536237 (PDF) Subjects: LCSH: Shakespeare, William, 1564–1616 – Criticism and interpretation. | LCSH: Shakespeare, William, 1564–1616
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Theory of Actuality SUNY Series in Ancient Greek Philosophy Author : Bechler, Z
    title : Aristotle's Theory of Actuality SUNY Series in Ancient Greek Philosophy author : Bechler, Z. publisher : State University of New York Press isbn10 | asin : 0791422399 print isbn13 : 9780791422397 ebook isbn13 : 9780585046068 language : English subject Aristotle, Philosophy of nature. publication date : 1995 lcc : B491.N3B43 1995eb ddc : 113 subject : Aristotle, Philosophy of nature. cover Aristotle's Theory Of Actuality cover-0 SUNY Series in Ancient Greek Philosophy Anthony Preus, Editor cover-1 Aristotle's Theory OF Actuality Zev Bechler State University of New York Press cover-2 Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 1995 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher. For information, address State University of New York Press, State University Plaza, Albany, N.Y., 12246 Production by Diane Ganeles Marketing by Fran Keneston Composition by Kelby Bowers, Compublishing, Cincinnati, Ohio Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bechler, Z. Aristotle's theory of actuality / Zev Bechler. p. cm.(SUNY series in ancient Greek philosophy) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7914-2239-9 (alk. paper).ISBN 0-7914-2240-2 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Aristotle. 2. Philosophy of nature. I. Title. II. Series. B491.N3B42 1995 185dc20 94-1045 CIP 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 cover-3 To Niza Dolav For her special friendship cover-4 Contents Acknowledgments xi Introduction: The Idea of Anti-Informationism 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Space in Hellenistic Philosophy
    Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, Christoph Horn (Eds.) Space in Hellenistic Philosophy Space in Hellenistic Philosophy Critical Studies in Ancient Physics Edited by Graziano Ranocchia Christoph Helmig Christoph Horn ISBN 978-3-11-036495-8 e-ISBN 978-3-11-036585-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Acknowledgements This volume has been published with the financial support of the European Research Council (ERC) and the National Research Council of Italy (CNR). Thanks are due to Aurora Corti for her editorial work and to Sergio Knipe for the linguis- tic revision of the manuscript. Table of Contents Abbreviations IX Introduction 1 Keimpe Algra Aristotle’s Conception of Place and its Reception in the Hellenistic Period 11 Michele Alessandrelli Aspects and Problems of Chrysippus’ Conception of Space 53 Teun Tieleman Posidonius on the Void. A Controversial Case of Divergence Revisited 69 David Konstan Epicurus on the Void 83 Holger Essler Space and Movement in Philodemus’ De dis 3: an Anti-Aristotelian Account 101 Carlos Lévy Roman Philosophy under
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating an Ethical Disposition (Hexis) As “Care of the Soul” in a Unique Ontological Vision of Socratic Education James M
    College of DuPage DigitalCommons@COD Philosophy Scholarship Philosophy Spring 2015 Facilitating an Ethical Disposition (Hexis) as “Care of the Soul” in a Unique Ontological Vision of Socratic Education James M. Magrini College of DuPage Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Magrini, James M., "Facilitating an Ethical Disposition (Hexis) as “Care of the Soul” in a Unique Ontological Vision of Socratic Education" (2015). Philosophy Scholarship. Paper 43. http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub/43 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at DigitalCommons@COD. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@COD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Facilitating an Ethical Disposition (Hexis) as “Care of the Soul” in a Unique Ontological Vision of Socratic Education Dr. James M. Magrini College of Dupage, USA Abstract This essay adopts a Continental philosophical approach to reading Plato’s Socrates in terms of a “third way” that cuts a middle path between doctrinal and esoteric readings of the dialogues. It presents a portrait of Socratic education that is at odds with contemporary views in education and curriculum that view Plato’s Socrates as either the teacher of a truth-finding method or proto-fascist authoritarian. It argues that the crucial issue of attempting to foster an ethical disposition (hexis) is a unique form of education, in terms of “care of the soul,” that unfolds only within the context of sustained dialectic interrogation. Education is a “difficult” process that entails the “turning” of the soul back to itself in an enlightened form, which is bound up with an ontological relationship of distance to the so-called “truth” of the virtues that appear in limited and dissembling ways to Socrates and the interlocutors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenology of Mimetic Learning and Multimodal Cognition: Integrating Experiential Knowledge Into Programs in Rhetoric, Composition, and Technical Communication
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2014 A PHENOMENOLOGY OF MIMETIC LEARNING AND MULTIMODAL COGNITION: INTEGRATING EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE INTO PROGRAMS IN RHETORIC, COMPOSITION, AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION Kevin R. Cassell Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Communication Commons, Rhetoric Commons, and the Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons Copyright 2014 Kevin R. Cassell Recommended Citation Cassell, Kevin R., "A PHENOMENOLOGY OF MIMETIC LEARNING AND MULTIMODAL COGNITION: INTEGRATING EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE INTO PROGRAMS IN RHETORIC, COMPOSITION, AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION", Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2014. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/810 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Communication Commons, Rhetoric Commons, and the Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons A PHENOMENOLOGY OF MIMETIC LEARNING AND MULTIMODAL COGNITION: INTEGRATING EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE INTO PROGRAMS IN RHETORIC, COMPOSITION, AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION By Kevin R. Cassell A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Rhetoric and Technical Communication MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2014 This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements
    [Show full text]