DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PONTIFICAL LAW of the ROMAN REPUBLIC by MICHAEL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PONTIFICAL LAW of the ROMAN REPUBLIC by MICHAEL THE PONTIFICAL LAW OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC by MICHAEL JOSEPH JOHNSON A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Classics written under the direct of T. Corey Brennan and approved by ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2007 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Pontifical Law of the Roman Republic by MICHAEL JOSEPH JOHNSON Dissertation Director: T. Corey Brennan This dissertation investigates the guiding principle of arguably the most important religious authority in ancient Rome, the pontifical college. Chapter One introduces the subject and discusses the hypothesis the dissertation will advance. Chapter Two examines the place of the college within Roman law and religion, giving particular attention to disproving several widely held notions about the relationship of the pontifical law to the civil and sacral law. Chapter Three offers the first detailed examination of the duties of the pontifical college as a collective body. I spend the bulk of the chapter analyzing two of the three collegiate duties I identify: the issuing of documents known as decrees and responses and the supervision of the Vestal Virgins. I analyze all decrees and responses from the point of view their content, treating first those that concern dedications, then those on the calendar, and finally those on vows. In doing so my goal is to understand the reasoning behind the decree and the major theological doctrines underpinning it. In documenting the pontifical supervision of Vestal Virgins I focus on the college's actions towards a Vestal accused of losing her chastity. I first reconstruct a typical trial from suspicion to condemnation. In doing so, one of my more important conclusions is that, pace Mommsen, the pontifex maximus did not possess the power to condemn a Vestal on his ii own without consulting his colleagues. After this I turn to a detailed analysis of the two decrees issued in connection with these trials. Most important is my contention that it was not so much the Vestal's lost chastity as her performance while unchaste of certain religious rites that gravely jeopardized the pax deorum , Rome's relationship with its gods. Chapter Four contains a summary of my findings and outlines future directions for fruitful research on the pontiffs and pontifical law. The work ends with an appendix in which I reproduce and translate all known passages in Latin that refer to the pontifical law. This appendix should be a useful and convenient reference tool for other scholars working on the pontiffs and pontifical law. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not exist without the support and help of many people. To two in particular I owe a debt I fear I cannot repay. My advisor, T. Corey Brennan, suggested the topic and saw it to completion with his inimitable flair for combining unfailingly shrewd and helpful advice with unstinting encouragement and support on all matters great and small; he never wavered in his belief that I would finish and finish well. But for him I would still be writing, with no end in sight. Jerzy Linderski generously agreed to read the dissertation, and his comments both saved me from many grievous errors and also pointed me in an inevitably more interesting and fruitful direction. The counsel, kindness, and sense of humor that he and Deedra provided are indispensable and seemingly inexhaustible resources upon which I have drawn and drawn heavily throughout my time in graduate school. Much, too, I owe to Thomas Figueira. His wide-ranging comments improved my prose, corrected my translations, and showed me how to construct a stronger argument. To read his remarks was to learn how to combine successfully the respective crafts of the historian and the philologist. Sarolta Takács brought to the dissertation her expertise in Roman religion, and her insights proved particularly helpful for the section on the Vestal Virgins. This dissertation also benefited from the generosity of Rutgers University and its Transliteratures Program, which provided me with five years of generous funding and, in the person of its director, Uri Eisenzweig, a welcome source of encouragement and wry humor. I was fortunate to spend my final year of graduate school at the American Academy in Rome as holder of that institution's Arthur Ross Pre-Doctoral Rome Prize. My time at iv the Academy was beyond description and improved my dissertation in ways too numerable to mention; to the Academy, its staff, and Mr. Arthur Ross I give my sincerest thanks. While at the Academy I benefited from the expertise of several people: Tom McGinn read and gave incisive comments on a sizeable portion of this dissertation, and both he and Carmela Vircillo Franklin gave generously of their time to advise and comment on my work. I thank Hendrik Dey for introducing me to soccer, sport of kings (and barbarians). In addition, both he and Lisa Mignone supplied much support, enthusiasm, and good humor, which saw me through several rough spots during my year in Rome and made my time there more enjoyable than it otherwise would have been. I also thank the Fondazione Lemmermann for financial support during my year in Rome. Several colleagues deserve much more than the meager thanks I can offer them here. Jeff Becker and Hilary Becker have always supplied a ready ear and abundant enthusiasm for discussing all things Roman; from them I have learned much; their encouragement has been invaluable. Thanks, too, to Jeff and Lisa Beneker; their friendship and advice have been one of the highlights of graduate school. The same should be said of Dennis McKay, without whose humor, support, and friendship I could never have finished this dissertation. Kevin Muse has continuously provided a sympathetic ear, prudent advice, and a matchless model of scholarly excellence, all of which were of inestimable help in seeing me through graduate school. To him and Vida Muse I offer heartfelt thanks. I have lost count of the number of times Andrew Scott and Alissa Vaillancourt went far beyond the obligations of friendship in the support they provided; I hope to be able to repay them. v I would also like to thank Eileen Torrence and Michael Cusick for first teaching me Latin; Jorge Taracido, for providing me with an important means to survive graduate school; and David Christiansen, Clifton Kreps, and Rebecca Harrison, for all that they taught me. My family and friends have been my biggest resource; without them I could not have started, let alone finished, graduate school. I thank Nate Alexander, Linda Bierley, Christian and Nick Blackburn, Bernice and Joe Diesko, Joe Diesko, Jr., George Diesko, Rody, Lena, Hildur Ek, Ryan Fowler, Gary and Ginger Johnson, Kevin and Christy Johnson, Wally and Evelyn Johnson, Bobby Jones, Jared Kuntz, George Brett, Larry Kowerski, Debra Nousek, Peter Parisi, Scott Poston, Steve Prefontaine, Sophie, Simon, Rebecca Vinduska, and Fred Zimmerman for their friendship and help. The greatest of all debts I owe to my immediate family, my parents, Greg and Kathy, and my brothers, Steve and Joe; these few words are poor recompense for their steadfast and unflagging support. Lastly, I thank Max, who has provided only joy and wonder. I dedicate this work to him. vi DEDICATION For Max vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION ………………………………………….... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS …………………………………………………………... iv DEDICATION ……………………………………………………………………… vii TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………… viii LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………………….. xi 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1 Plan of study …………………………………………………………………. 6 1.2 Sources for the pontifical law ………………………………………………... 15 1.3 Review of scholarship ……………………………………………………….. 17 2. THE PONTIFICAL LAW AND ROMAN RELIGION ..……………………….. 21 2.1 Defining the pontifical law …………………………………………………... 23 2.1.1 Berger's definition …………………………………………..…………. 24 2.2 The pontiffs and the civil law ……………………………………………….. 28 2.2.1 " pontificem bonum neminem esse , nisi qui ius ciuile cognosset " .…….. 30 2.2.2 Conclusions ………………..………………………………………….. 46 2.3 The pontiffs and Roman religion ……………..……………………………... 48 2.3.1 Latin terms for 'pontifical law' .………………………………………... 49 2.3.2 The pontiffs and the state religion …………….………………………. 64 2.3.3 pontifices praesunt …………………………………………………..… 71 2.3.4 sacra et caerimoniae …………………………………………………... 75 2.3.4.1 The pontiffs and the ius sacrum …………………………….…… 85 2.3.4.2 The pontiffs and the ius sacrorum .………………………………. 90 viii 2.3.4.3 The pontiffs and the ius caerimoniarum ……..………………….. 108 2.3.4.4 Summarizing comments …………………………………………. 112 2.4 Additional areas of the pontifical law ………………………………..…….... 113 2.5 Conclusion: defining the pontifical law, part II …………………………….. 117 3. THE DUTIES OF THE PONTIFICAL COLLEGE ……………………………. 120 3.1 Individual vs. collegiate duties ……………………………………………… 123 3.2 Keeping the pontifical discipline ……………………………………………. 128 3.3 decreta et responsa ………………………………………………………….. 132 3.3.1 decreta initiated by the college ………………………………………... 134 3.3.1.1 decretum de feriis praecidaneis …………………………………... 135 3.3.1.2 Another possibly self-initiated decretum …………………………. 142 3.3.2 decreta initiated by outside agent ……………………………………... 143 3.3.2.1 Procedural observations …………………………………………... 143 3.3.2.2 The location of meetings of the pontifical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vestal Virgins and Their Families
    Vestal Virgins and Their Families Andrew B. Gallia* I. INTRODUCTION There is perhaps no more shining example of the extent to which the field of Roman studies has been enriched by a renewed engagement with anthropology and other cognate disciplines than the efflorescence of interest in the Vestal virgins that has followed Mary Beard’s path-breaking article regarding these priestesses’ “sexual status.”1 No longer content to treat the privileges and ritual obligations of this priesthood as the vestiges of some original position (whether as wives or daughters) in the household of the early Roman kings, scholars now interrogate these features as part of the broader frameworks of social and cultural meaning through which Roman concepts of family, * Published in Classical Antiquity 34.1 (2015). Early versions of this article were inflicted upon audiences in Berkeley and Minneapolis. I wish to thank the participants of those colloquia for helpful and judicious feedback, especially Ruth Karras, Darcy Krasne, Carlos Noreña, J. B. Shank, and Barbara Welke. I am also indebted to George Sheets, who read a penultimate draft, and to Alain Gowing and the anonymous readers for CA, who prompted additional improvements. None of the above should be held accountable for the views expressed or any errors that remain. 1 Beard 1980, cited approvingly by, e.g., Hopkins 1983: 18, Hallett 1984: x, Brown 1988: 8, Schultz 2012: 122. Critiques: Gardner 1986: 24-25, Beard 1995. 1 gender, and religion were produced.2 This shift, from a quasi-diachronic perspective, which seeks explanations for recorded phenomena in the conditions of an imagined past, to a more synchronic approach, in which contemporary contexts are emphasized, represents a welcome methodological advance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Burial of the Urban Poor in Italy in the Late Republic and Early Empire
    Death, disposal and the destitute: The burial of the urban poor in Italy in the late Republic and early Empire Emma-Jayne Graham Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Sheffield December 2004 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk The following have been excluded from this digital copy at the request of the university: Fig 12 on page 24 Fig 16 on page 61 Fig 24 on page 162 Fig 25 on page 163 Fig 26 on page 164 Fig 28 on page 168 Fig 30on page 170 Fig 31 on page 173 Abstract Recent studies of Roman funerary practices have demonstrated that these activities were a vital component of urban social and religious processes. These investigations have, however, largely privileged the importance of these activities to the upper levels of society. Attempts to examine the responses of the lower classes to death, and its consequent demands for disposal and commemoration, have focused on the activities of freedmen and slaves anxious to establish or maintain their social position. The free poor, living on the edge of subsistence, are often disregarded and believed to have been unceremoniously discarded within anonymous mass graves (puticuli) such as those discovered at Rome by Lanciani in the late nineteenth century. This thesis re-examines the archaeological and historical evidence for the funerary practices of the urban poor in Italy within their appropriate social, legal and religious context. The thesis attempts to demonstrate that the desire for commemoration and the need to provide legitimate burial were strong at all social levels and linked to several factors common to all social strata.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Cleaning-Up of the City: from the Lupercalia to the Argei*
    RITUAL CLEANING-UP OF THE CITY: FROM THE LUPERCALIA TO THE ARGEI* This paper is not an analysis of the fine aspects of ritual, myth and ety- mology. I do not intend to guess the exact meaning of Luperci and Argei, or why the former sacrificed a dog and the latter were bound hand and foot. What I want to examine is the role of the festivals of the Lupercalia and the Argei in the functioning of the Roman community. The best-informed among ancient writers were convinced that these were purification cere- monies. I assume that the ancients knew what they were talking about and propose, first, to establish the nature of the ritual cleanliness of the city, and second, see by what techniques the two festivals achieved that goal. What, in the perception of the Romans themselves, normally made their city unclean? What were the ordinary, repetitive sources of pollution in pre-Imperial Rome, before the concept of the cura Urbis was refined? The answer to this is provided by taboos and restrictions on certain sub- stances, and also certain activities, in the City. First, there is a rule from the Twelve Tables with Cicero’s curiously anachronistic comment: «hominem mortuum», inquit lex in duodecim, «in urbe ne sepelito neve urito», credo vel propter ignis periculum (De leg. II 58). Secondly, we have the edict of the praetor L. Sentius C.f., known from three inscrip- tions dating from the beginning of the first century BC1: L. Sentius C. f. pr(aetor) de sen(atus) sent(entia) loca terminanda coer(avit).
    [Show full text]
  • Magic in Private and Public Lives of the Ancient Romans
    COLLECTANEA PHILOLOGICA XXIII, 2020: 53–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.04 Idaliana KACZOR Uniwersytet Łódzki MAGIC IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LIVES OF THE ANCIENT ROMANS The Romans practiced magic in their private and public life. Besides magical practices against the property and lives of people, the Romans also used generally known and used protective and healing magic. Sometimes magical practices were used in official religious ceremonies for the safety of the civil and sacral community of the Romans. Keywords: ancient magic practice, homeopathic magic, black magic, ancient Roman religion, Roman religious festivals MAGIE IM PRIVATEN UND ÖFFENTLICHEN LEBEN DER ALTEN RÖMER Die Römer praktizierten Magie in ihrem privaten und öffentlichen Leben. Neben magische Praktik- en gegen das Eigentum und das Leben von Menschen, verwendeten die Römer auch allgemein bekannte und verwendete Schutz- und Heilmagie. Manchmal wurden magische Praktiken in offiziellen religiösen Zeremonien zur Sicherheit der bürgerlichen und sakralen Gemeinschaft der Römer angewendet. Schlüsselwörter: alte magische Praxis, homöopathische Magie, schwarze Magie, alte römi- sche Religion, Römische religiöse Feste Magic, despite our sustained efforts at defining this term, remains a slippery and obscure concept. It is uncertain how magic has been understood and practised in differ- ent cultural contexts and what the difference is (if any) between magical and religious praxis. Similarly, no satisfactory and all-encompassing definition of ‘magic’ exists. It appears that no singular concept of ‘magic’ has ever existed: instead, this polyvalent notion emerged at the crossroads of local custom, religious praxis, superstition, and politics of the day. Individual scholars of magic, positioning themselves as ostensi- bly objective observers (an etic perspective), mostly defined magic in opposition to religion and overemphasised intercultural parallels over differences1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eternal Fire of Vesta
    2016 Ian McElroy All Rights Reserved THE ETERNAL FIRE OF VESTA Roman Cultural Identity and the Legitimacy of Augustus By Ian McElroy A thesis submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Program in Classics Written under the direction of Dr. Serena Connolly And approved by ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS The Eternal Fire of Vesta: Roman Cultural Identity and the Legitimacy of Augustus By Ian McElroy Thesis Director: Dr. Serena Connolly Vesta and the Vestal Virgins represented the very core of Roman cultural identity, and Augustus positioned his public image beside them to augment his political legitimacy. Through analysis of material culture, historiography, and poetry that originated during the principate of Augustus, it becomes clear that each of these sources of evidence contributes to the public image projected by the leader whom Ronald Syme considered to be the first Roman emperor. The Ara Pacis Augustae and the Res Gestae Divi Augustae embody the legacy the Emperor wished to establish, and each of these cultural works contain significant references to the Vestal Virgins. The study of history Livy undertook also emphasized the pathetic plight of Rhea Silvia as she was compelled to become a Vestal. Livy and his contemporary Dionysius of Halicarnassus explored the foundation of the Vestal Order and each writer had his own explanation about how Numa founded it. The Roman poets Virgil, Horace, Ovid, and Tibullus incorporated Vesta and the Vestals into their work in a way that offers further proof of the way Augustus insinuated himself into the fabric of Roman cultural identity by associating his public image with these honored priestesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontifex Maximus
    bs_bs_banner Journal of Religious History Vol. ••, No. ••, •• 2016 doi: 10.1111/1467-9809.12400 ROALD DIJKSTRA AND DORINE VAN ESPELO Anchoring Pontifical Authority: A Reconsideration of the Papal Employment of the Title Pontifex Maximus It is a common assumption that the title of supreme priesthood or pontifex maximus is included in the official papal titulature, and it has been supposed that the Roman bishop adopted it from the Roman emperor in late antiquity. In fact, however, it was probably not until the fifteenth century that the designation was first used by the papacy, and it has continued to be part of papal representation ever since. The title was deeply rooted in the Roman imperial past. At several stages in papal history the papal agency felt the need to draw back (again) on this ancient, traditional title and managed to successfully (re-)introduce the title by anchoring it in the cultural biogra- phy of the papacy. Introduction Since Antiquity, the interplay between the Roman bishops and secular rulers has been subject to continuous transformation and renegotiation, as both groups continually reverted to established traditions in order to sustain legiti- macy and pre-eminence.1 At the same time, however, modes of representation had to be innovative in order to appeal to contemporary tastes, needs, and ex- pectations. Anchoring these novelties in tradition was a convenient means of implementing, and reinforcing, the desired effect, and tracing these processes of embedding the new in the familiar offers us the possibility of understanding cultural, political, and religious transformation. An outstanding example of this kind of “anchoring innovation” is that of Roman episcopal titulature, as can be 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Temples and Priests of Sol in the City of Rome
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242330197 Temples and Priests of Sol in the City of Rome Article in Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · January 2010 DOI: 10.1353/mou.2010.0073 CITATIONS READS 0 550 1 author: S. E. Hijmans University of Alberta 23 PUBLICATIONS 9 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: S. E. Hijmans Retrieved on: 03 November 2016 Temples and Priests of Sol in the city of Rome Summary It was long thought that Sol Invictus was a Syrian sun-god, and that Aurelian imported his cult into Rome after he had vanquished Zenobia and captured Palmyra. This sun-god, it was postulated, differed fundamentally from the old Roman sun-god Sol Indiges, whose cult had long since disappeared from Rome. Scholars thus tended to postulate a hiatus in the first centuries of imperial rule during which there was little or no cult of the sun in Rome. Recent studies, however, have shown that Aurelian’s Sol Invictus was neither new nor foreign, and that the cult of the sun was maintained in Rome without interruption from the city’s earliest history until the demise of Roman religion(s). This continuity of the Roman cult of Sol sheds a new light on the evidence for priests and temples of Sol in Rome. In this article I offer a review of that evidence and what we can infer from it the Roman cult of the sun. A significant portion of the article is devoted to a temple of Sol in Trastevere, hitherto misidentified.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vestal Virgins' Socio-Political Role and the Narrative of Roma
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa 2021; 14 (2), s. 127–151 doi:10.4467/20844131KS.21.011.13519 www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa Zeszyt 2 Karolina WyrWińsKa http:/orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-6271 Jagiellonian University in Kraków The Vestal Virgins’ Socio-political Role and the Narrative of Roma Aeterna Abstract Roman women – priestesses, patrician women, mysterious guardians of the sacred flame of goddess Vesta, admired and respected, sometimes blamed for misfortune of the Eternal City. Vestals identified with the eternity of Rome, the priestesses having a specific, unavailable to other women power. That power gained at the moment of a ritual capture (captio) and responsibilities and privileges resulted from it are the subject matter of this paper. The special attention is paid to the importance of Vestals for Rome and Romans in various historic moments, and to the purifying rituals performed by Vestals on behalf of the Roman state’s fortune. The study presents probable dating and possible causes of the end of the College of the Vestals in Rome. Keywords: Vesta, vestals, priesthood, priestesses, rituals Słowa kluczowe: Westa, westalki, kapłaństwo, kapłanki, rytuały Vesta and her priestesses Plutarch was not certain to which of the Roman kings attribute the implementation of the cult of Vesta in Rome, for he indicated that it had been done either by the legendary king- priest Numa Pompilius or even Romulus, who himself being a son of a Vestal Virgin, according to the legend, transferred the cult of the goddess from Alba Longa,1 which was contradicted by Livy’s work that categorically attributes the establishment of the Vestal Virgins to Numa by removing the priesthood structure from Alba Longa and providing it with support from the state treasury as well as by granting the priestesses numerous privileges”.2 Vesta, the daughter of Saturn and Ops became one of the most important 1 Plut.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Eye of the Beholder
    IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: THE PARADOX OF THE ROMAN PERCEPTION REGARDING THE SOCIAL STATUS OF THE EUNUCH PRIEST IN IMPERIAL ROME Silvia de Wild Supervisor 1: dr. M. (Martijn) Icks Second Reader: dr. M.P. (Mathieu) de Bakker MA Classics and Ancient Civilizations (Classics) Student number: 11238100 Words: 22.603 June 25, 2020 [email protected] 2 IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: THE PARADOX OF THE ROMAN PERCEPTION REGARDING THE SOCIAL STATUS OF THE EUNUCH PRIEST IN IMPERIAL ROME University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Humanities Amsterdam Centre for Ancient Studies and Archaeology (ACASA), Classics and Ancient Civilizations: Classics (MA) Silvia de Wild Schoolstraat 5 8911 BH Leeuwarden Tel.: 0616359454/ 058-8446762 [email protected]/ [email protected] Student number: 11238100 Supervisor: dr. M. (Martijn) Icks Second Reader: dr. M.P. (Mathieu) de Bakker Words: 22.603 (appendix, bibliography, citations, source texts and translations not included) June 25, 2020. I herewith declare that this thesis is an original piece of work, which was written exclusively by me. Those instances where I have derived material from other sources, I have made explicit in the text and the notes. (Leeuwarden, June 25, 2020) 3 I would like to thank dr. L.A. (Lucinda) Dirven for sharing her time and expertise on this subject. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Research question 6 Methods and overview 7 1. Introduction 9 2. The imperial (r)evolution of the cult of Cybele and Attis 16 3. Eunuch priests in the eye of an ass: a case study on the perception of the wandering priests in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses 8.24 - 9.10 30 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 75 AD NUMA POMPILIUS Legendary, 8Th-7Th Century B.C. Plutarch Translated by John Dryden
    75 AD NUMA POMPILIUS Legendary, 8th-7th Century B.C. Plutarch translated by John Dryden Plutarch (46-120) - Greek biographer, historian, and philosopher, sometimes known as the encyclopaedist of antiquity. He is most renowned for his series of character studies, arranged mostly in pairs, known as “Plutarch’s Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans” or “Parallel Lives.” Numa Pompilius (75 AD) - A study of the life of Numa Pompilius, an early Roman king. NUMA POMPILIUS THOUGH the pedigrees of noble families of Rome go back in exact form as far as Numa Pompilius, yet there is great diversity amongst historians concerning the time in which he reigned; a certain writer called Clodius, in a book of his entitled Strictures on Chronology, avers that the ancient registers of Rome were lost when the city was sacked by the Gauls, and that those which are now extant were counterfeited, to flatter and serve the humour of some men who wished to have themselves derived from some ancient and noble lineage, though in reality with no claim to it. And though it be commonly reported that Numa was a scholar and a familiar acquaintance of Pythagoras, yet it is again contradicted by others, who affirm that he was acquainted with neither the Greek language nor learning, and that he was a person of that natural talent and ability as of himself to attain to virtue, or else that he found some barbarian instructor superior to Pythagoras. Some affirm, also, that Pythagoras was not contemporary with Numa, but lived at least five generations after him; and that some other Pythagoras, a native of Sparta, who, in the sixteenth Olympiad, in the third year of which Numa became king, won a prize at the Olympic race, might, in his travel through Italy, have gained acquaintance with Numa, and assisted him in the constitution of his kingdom; whence it comes that many Laconian laws and customs appear amongst the Roman institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbidden to Enter the Ara Maxima: Dogs and Flies, Or Dogflies?*)
    FORBIDDEN TO ENTER THE ARA MAXIMA: DOGS AND FLIES, OR DOGFLIES?*) by CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MCDONOUGH Of the numerous oddities connected with the worship of Hercules at the Ara Maxima, surely the strangest is the exclusion of ies and dogs. Pliny the Elder writes, Romae in aedem Herculis in foro Boario nec muscae nec canes intrant (HN 10.79). Solinus, who generally follows Pliny,1) expatiates upon this idea, remarking (1.11), Suo quoque numini idem Hercules instituit aram, quae maxima apud ponti ces habetur, cum se ex Nicostrate ...inmortalem conperisset. Consaeptum etiam, intra quod ritus sacrorum, factis bovicidis, docuit Potitios, sacellum in Boario foro est, in quo argumenta et convivii et maiestatis ipsius remanent. Nam divinitus neque muscis illo neque canibus ingressus est. Furthermore, Hercules likewise set up an altar to his own godhood, an altar called the Greatest by the ponti Vs, after he discovered from Nicostrate ...that he was immortal. The enclosed shrine—within which he taught the Potitii the rites of worship after the bull-sacri ce— is in the Forum Boarium, in which the signs of both his banquet and his majesty reside. For, in a divine manner, it may be entered there neither by ies or dogs. Plutarch, on the other hand,—apparently drawing on Varro,—men- tions only an exclusion of dogs, asking ( RQ 90 = Mor. 285 E-F), DiŒ tÛ tÒ „HrakleÝ ginom¡ nhw yusÛaw llon oéd¡ na yeÇn ônom‹zousin oéd¢ faÛnetai kævn ¤ntòw tÇn peribñlvn , Éw B‹rrvn ßstñrhken ;2) Why is no other god mentioned during the sacri ce to Hercules? And why is it that no dog is seen within his enclosures, as Varro records? *) A version of this paper was read at the one hundred and twenty-eighth meet- ing of the American Philological Association in Washington, D.C., December 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression “Loco Filiae” in Gaius' Institutes
    ARTICLES 1SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON THE EXPRESSION “LOCO FILIAE” IN GAIUS’ INSTITUTES Carlos Felipe Amunátegui Perelló* Patricio-Ignacio Carvajal Ramírez** Key words: Manus; potestas; mancipium; Gaius 1 Introduction The expression “loco filiae” that Gaius uses to describe the position of the wife in manu has led a significant number of scholars to the firm belief thatmanus and patria * Professor of Roman law, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Chile. This article is part of the Conicyt Research Project Anillos de Instigación Asociativa SOC 1111 and Fondecyt Regular 1141231. ** Professor of Roman law, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Chile. This article is part of the Conicyt Research Project Anillos de Instigación Asociativa SOC 1111 and Fondecyt Regular 1141231. Fundamina DOI: 10.17159/2411-7870/2016/v22n1a1 Volume 22 | Number 1 | 2016 Print ISSN 1021-545X/ Online ISSN 2411-7870 pp 1-24 1 CARLOS FELIPE AMUNÁTEGUI PERELLÓ AND PATRICIO-IGNACIO CARVAJAL RAMÍREZ potestas were equivalent powers.1 Although the personal powers that a paterfamilias could exert over his descendants did not seem to match those that he could apply to his wife in manu, Gaius consistently uses the expression loco filiae to describe her position. The personal powers which a paterfamilias usually held in relation to his descendants, namely the vitae necisque potestas (the power to kill or let live), ius noxa dandi (the right to surrender the perpetrator of some pre-defined offences), and the ius vendendi (the right to sell them in mancipio), seem to have adjusted poorly to the position of a wife under manus. Although the possibility has been put forward that the husband had some kind of ius vitae necisque over his wife in manu,2 this notion remains controversial.3 Further, the possibility of selling one’s own wife or surrendering her after a noxal action is not supported by any ancient sources.
    [Show full text]