Neil Mcguigan Phd Thesis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NEITHER SCOTLAND NOR ENGLAND: MIDDLE BRITAIN, C.850-1150 Neil McGuigan A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/7829 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence Neither Scotland nor England: Middle Britain, c.850–1150 Neil McGuigan This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 26-01-2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Neil McGuigan, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 105,700 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2008 and as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mediaeval History in September 2008; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2008 and 2015. Date ……………….. signature of candidate …………………………… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mediaeval History in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date ……………….. signature of supervisor …………………………… 3. Permission for publication: (to be signed by both candidate and supervisor) In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. I also understand that the title and the abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker, that my thesis will be electronically accessible for personal or research use unless exempt by award of an embargo as requested below, and that the library has the right to migrate my thesis into new electronic forms as required to ensure continued access to the thesis. I have obtained any third-party copyright permissions that may be required in order to allow such access and migration, or have requested the appropriate embargo below. The following is an agreed request by candidate and supervisor regarding the publication of this thesis: PRINTED COPY a) No embargo on print copy ELECTRONIC COPY a) No embargo on electronic copy Date ……………….. signature of candidate …………………………… signature of supervisor …………………………… Acknowledgements Many thanks are owed to the thesis's supervisor, Alex Woolf, who was forced to read many less developed versions of this work, and was always kind and patient. He was also incredibly insightful and enthusiastic. Much gratitude is felt towards the School of History and the people of the institutes of Mediaeval Studies and Scottish Historical Research at St Andrews who have provided, as well as worthy office space, so much stimulation over the years; and to the University of St Andrews for providing many great teaching opportunities; in that regard, for the help given by Angus Stewart, John Hudson, Chris Jones, Michael Brown, Simon MacLean, Christine McGladdery, and Tim Greenwood. No fewer thanks are owed to the secretaries Audrey and Dorothy, who have provided a great deal of support. Thanks also to Dauvit Broun, Clare Downham, Alice Taylor, and David Woodman for providing advance (or otherwise inaccessible) resources; and to Robert Bartlett, Linsey Hunter, David Petts, Simon Taylor, and Victoria Whitworth, for helpful pointers or discussions; and for the same reasons, thanks to Edward Roberts, Gary Paul Stratton, and Steve Watt, fellow PhD students in the department. Appreciation is also owed to many previous mentors who in master's and undergraduate years paved the way for this project, particularly to Steve Boardman and James Fraser, and to Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones, Andrew Brown, Daniel Waugh, but to many others as well; also to be thanked are Erik Kravets, Mohamed Elmaazi, and Daniel Murray, for their friendship during this period. Finally, I would like to thank and express love to my family; my sons for enduring so much absence from their father on account of this work; and above all, for their love and support, my mother Alison and my wife Keri, without whose time and patience this thesis could not have been completed. ii THESIS ABSTRACT Neither Scotland nor England: Middle Britain, c.850–1150 In and around the 870s, Britain was transformed dramatically by the campaigns and settlements of the Great Army and its allies. Some pre-existing political communities suffered less than others, and in hindsight the process helped Scotland and England achieve their later positions. By the twelfth century, the rulers of these countries had partitioned the former kingdom of Northumbria. This thesis is about what happened in the intervening period, the fate of Northumbria’s political structures, and how the settlement that defined Britain for the remainder of the Middle Ages came about. Modern reconstructions of the era have tended to be limited in scope and based on unreliable post-1100 sources. The aim is to use contemporary material to overcome such limitations, and reach positive conclusions that will make more sense of the evidence and make the region easier to understand for a wider audience, particularly in regard to its shadowy polities and ecclesiastical structures. After an overview of the most important evidence, two chapters will review Northumbria’s alleged dissolution, testing existing historiographic beliefs (based largely on Anglo-Norman-era evidence) about the fate of the monarchy, political community, and episcopate. The impact and nature of ‘Southenglish’ hegemony on the region’s political communities will be the focus of the fourth chapter, while the fifth will look at evidence for the expansion of Scottish political power. The sixth chapter will try to draw positive conclusions about the episcopate, leaving the final chapter to look in more detail at the institutions that produced the final settlement. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. ii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. iv Abbreviations .........................................................................................................................................x Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Key Sources ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 ‘Northern’ Sources ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 Historia de Sancto Cuthberto ............................................................................................... 8 1.1.2 Cronica Monasterii Dunelmensis ........................................................................................ 13 1.1.3 Annales Lindisfarnenses et Dunelmenses and Libellus de Exordio ...................................... 13 1.1.4 Minor Tracts ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 English National Chronicles ....................................................................................................... 16 1.2.1 Anglo-Saxon Annals ............................................................................................................ 16 1.2.2 Anglo-Latin Annals ............................................................................................................. 17 1.2.3 Chronicle Narrative ............................................................................................................ 21 1.2.4 Sagas and Saint Lives .......................................................................................................... 21 1.3 Charters .................................................................................................................................... 22 1.4 Legal Texts ................................................................................................................................ 23 1.5 Notitiae Dignitatum .................................................................................................................. 23 1.6 Irish Annals................................................................................................................................ 24 1.7 Scottish Chronicles and King-lists .............................................................................................. 25 2. Reconfiguration .............................................................................................................................