DOCSLIB.ORG

10 27 Kahanpaa Et Winqvist Diptera Checklist.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10 27 Kahanpaa Et Winqvist Diptera Checklist.Indd 10 © Sahlbergia Vol. 10: 10–27, 2005 Check-list of Finnish flies: families Xylophagidae – Microphoridae Jere Kahanpää & Kaj Winqvist Kahanpää, J. & Winqvist, K. 2005: Check-list of Finnish flies: families Xy- lophagidae – Microphoridae. — Sahlbergia 10: 10–27. Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1237–3273. A checklist is presented for the Finnish species of the fly families Xylophagidae, Stratiomyidae, Xylomyidae, Athericidae, Rhagionidae, Tabanidae, Acroceridae, Asilidae, Bombyliidae, Mythicomyiidae, Therevidae, Scenopinidae, Atelesti- dae, Empididae, Hybotidae and Microphoridae. Seventeen species previously not recorded from Finland are here added to the Finnish fauna. The following species have been erroneously reported from Finland and are here deleted from the list of Finnish species: Tabanidae: Haematopota italica Meigen, 1804. Stra- tiomyidae: Odontomyia hydroleon (Linnaeus, 1758). Asilidae: Cyrtopogon ma- culipennis (Macquart, 1834), Machimus gonatistes (Zeller, 1840). Bombyliidae: Phthiria canescens Loew, 1846, Anastoechus nitidulus (Fabricius, 1794), Villa fasciata (Meigen, 1804), Villa longicornis Lyneborg, 1965, Villa panisca (Rossi, 1790). Therevidae: Cliorismia ardea (Fabricius, 1794), Cliorismia rustica (Pan- zer, 1804). Empididae: Wiedemannia fallaciosa (Loew, 1873), Empis punctata Meigen, 1804, Hilara hirtella Collin, 1927, Hilara pseudochorica Strobl, 1892, Hilara scrobiculata Loew, 1873, Hilara tetragramma Loew, 1873, Rhampho- myia poissoni (Theren, 1966), Rhamphomyia tibialis Meigen, 1822. Hyboti- dae: Crossopalpus abditus Kovalev, 1972. The Finnish records of Rhagionidae: Chrysophilus splendidus (Meigen), Asilidae: Epitriptus arthriticus (Zeller), Epitriptus cingulatus (Fabricius), Choerades fimbriata (Meigen) and Hyboti- dae: Drapetis incompleta Collin, 1926 are considered dubious, and they are not included in the checklist. The total number of species found from Finland in these families is now 483. Jere Kahanpää, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: kahanpaa@iki.fi Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland E-mail: [email protected] Introduction have been recorded from Finland. In a global About 25 years have elapsed since Hackman comparison Finnish flies are known relatively published his checklist of Finnish Diptera well. Nevertheless, a lot of work is still need- (1980). A new checklist of Finnish flies is ed to cover gaps of faunistic and taxonomical needed already now, since the nomenclature knowledge in this large insect group. Because has had great changes in many fly families the study of such a big amount of species with and the taxonomical knowledge has consider- the available small resources is slow the new ably advanced. To date, about 3600 fly species checklist will be published in suitable smaller Kahanpää & Winqvist: Check-list of Finnish flies 11 parts. Updated checklists for families Doli- earlier checklists (Frey 1911, 1913, 1941, chopodidae (Kahanpää & Grichanov 2004) Hackman 1980, the Palaearctic Catalogue, nu- and Syrphidae (Haarto & Kerppola 2004) merous individual articles). Each record was have already been published. In this paper we then checked against existing museum mate- present a new checklist of Finnish flies for su- rial. The junior author examined the Diptera perfamilies Xylophagoidea, Stratiomyoidea, Fennica collection in the Zoological Museum, Tabanoidea, Nemestrinoidea, Asiloidea and University of Helsinki (MZH), the universi- Empidoidea (excl. Dolichopodidae). ty collections in Turku and Oulu, the insect Richard Frey published two papers dea- collections held by natural history and con- ling with the fly families covered here already servation societies in Kuopio and Forssa and in the early 20th century (Frey 1911, 1913). the private collections of Dr. Antti Haarto and Later, checklists of the whole fauna of Fin- the authors. Richard Frey’s collection (now a nish Diptera were published by Frey (1941) part of MZH Diptera collection) and the in- and Walter Hackman (1980). Ever since 1921 sect collection of the Department of Applied new additions and deletions of species of all Biology (University of Helsinki, now also a Finnish insect groups have been published in part of MZH) were examined by the senior 5-year intervals, first by Hellén 1921-1976, author, who also helped with some empidid then by Silfverberg 1981-2001. Until 1986 genera in MZH. Critical specimens were sent these articles were published in Notulae En- to specialists for identification. New species tomologicae, subsequently in Entomologica for Finland found during the identification Fennica. Also the Catalogue of Palaearctic work were added into the list. Diptera (Soós & Papp 1984-1994) contains For a majority of species at least one cor- faunistic information on Finnish flies. rectly identified Finnish reference specimen This checklist covers the area of the sta- was found in the abovementioned collections. te of Finland by the current definition. After If no such specimen was found, we cleared out the Second World War the borders of Finland the reasons why these species were originally were moved especially in Karelia and Kuusa- reported from Finland. In most such cases it mo region. Old articles published before 1945 was possible to classify all published records include many species which were recorded either as misidentifications or as originating only in the areas now belonging to Russia. In from the current Russian territory. A mere li- Hackman’s checklist this transition of borders terary record was accepted as evidence for a is mainly taken into consideration, but not in species being Finnish only if the identifyer all cases. Also catalogues published by foreign was known and could be considered a specia- researchers may neglect this border problem. list of the species-group or family in question. For example both Hackman’s checklist and If no records were confirmed, the species was Palaearctic catalogue regard two Psilocephala deleted from the checklist. A few borderline (Therevidae) species as Finnish even though cases were tagged dubious and are listed in they have never been recorded in the territory a separate cathegory after the checklist. The of post-war Finland. status of all nontrivial species is presented in detail in Results. Criteria for inclusion The compilation of this checklist was initi- Structure of the checklist (appendix A) ated by preparing a ”proto-checklist”, which The classification of superfamilies follows included all the earlier published records and mainly the Nearctic Manual, Vol. 3 (McAlpi- 12 Kahanpää & Winqvist: Check-list of Finnish flies ne 1989). This choice is purely pragmatic; it Table 1. Number of species (by family) recorded from is used in most recent checklists for European Finland in published checklists (Frey 1911-13, Frey countries. Subtaxa of each superfamily (fa- 1941, Hackman 1980, this paper). Species in older checklists are counted only if they are included in the milies, subfamilies, tribes, genera) are listed current checklist; misidentifications and exclusively alphabetically. Russian species have been excluded. Species are listed in alphabetic order un- der the genus name. Synonyms are listed here Family Checklist published only if they have been used in major Finnish 1911-13 1941 1980 2004 Xylophagidae 2 4 4 5 papers, especially in the previous checklists. Athericidae 1 1 1 1 All names used in the previous checklists are Rhagionidae 14 15 14 16 included. Preoccupied names (preocc.) and Tabanidae 27 30 37 40 emendations (emend.) are labelled according- Stratiomyidae 21 25 27 27 ly. Xylomyidae 1 1 1 1 Misidentifications (misident.) are listed Acroceridae 3 4 5 5 only if the species was reported as new for Asilidae 30 33 34 35 Finland under the given name. In this case the Bombyliidae 16 18 18 18 Mythicomyiidae 0 1 1 1 author name and year refers to the publication Scenopinidae 2 2 2 3 of the Finnish record. Species with notes in Therevidae 10 12 17 17 Results are marked with an asterisk (*) after Atelestidae 0 1 1 2 the species name. Empididae 125 142 151 172 Hybotidae 79 98 129 137 Results Microphoridae 2 2 2 3 The number of species found from Finland Total 333 389 444 483 new % 14% 12% 8% in the families included in this study is 483. Table 1 shows the total number of species for each family, and a comparison with the spe- dae: Cliorismia ardea (Fabricius, 1794), Clio- cies numbers recorded in previous checklists. rismia rustica (Panzer, 1804). Empididae: Only the species that have been found in post- Wiedemannia fallaciosa (Loew, 1873), Empis war Finland were counted in all cases. Seven- punctata Meigen, 1804, Hilara hirtella Col- teen species have previously not been recor- lin, 1927, Hilara pseudochorica Strobl, 1892, ded from the country and are here added to Hilara scrobiculata Loew, 1873, Hilara tetra- the Finnish fauna. The following species have gramma Loew, 1873, Rhamphomyia poissoni erroneously been reported from Finland - but (Theren, 1966), Rhamphomyia tibialis Mei- not necessarily included in previous checklists gen, 1822. Hybotidae: Crossopalpus abditus - and are here deleted from the list of Finnish Kovalev, 1972. The circumstances leading to species: Tabanidae: Haematopota italica Mei- the deletion of each species are presented in gen, 1804. Stratiomyidae: Odontomyia hydro- the notes below. leon (Linnaeus, 1758). Asilidae: Cyrtopogon The Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera lists maculipennis (Macquart, 1834), Machimus Rhagionidae: Chrysophilus splendidus (Mei- gonatistes (Zeller,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera
    Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera • The Panorpida contain 5 orders: the Mecoptera, Siphonaptera, Diptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. • Available evidence clearly indicates that the Lepidoptera and the Trichoptera are sister groups. • The Siphonaptera and Mecoptera are also closely related but it is not clear whether the Siponaptera is the sister group of all of the Mecoptera or a group (Boreidae) within the Mecoptera. If the latter is true, then the Mecoptera is paraphyletic as currently defined. • The Diptera is the sister group of the Siphonaptera + Mecoptera and together make up the Mecopteroids. • The Hymenoptera does not appear to be closely related to any of the other holometabolous orders. Mecoptera (Scorpionflies, hangingflies) • Classification. 600 species worldwide, arranged into 9 families (5 in the US). A very old group, many fossils from the Permian (260 mya) onward. • Structure. Most distinctive feature is the elongated clypeus and labrum that together form a rostrum. The order gets its common name from the gential segment of the male in the family Panorpodiae, which is bulbous and often curved forward above the abdomen, like the sting of a scorpion. Larvae are caterpillar-like or grub- like. • Natural history. Scorpionflies are most common in cool, moist habitats. They get the name “hangingflies” from their habit of hanging upside down on vegetation. Larvae and adult males are mostly predators or scavengers. Adult females are usually scavengers. Larvae and adults in some groups may feed on vegetation. Larvae of most species are terrestrial and caterpillar-like in body form. Larvae of some species are aquatic. In the family Bittacidae males attract females for mating by releasing a sex pheromone and then presenting the female with a nuptial gift.
    [Show full text]
  • QQR 7 Information Pack
    7th Quinquennial Review of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) Information Pack (version 2.21) 14 May 2021 1 Version 2.2: Four reptiles and two seals removed from the EPS list (Annex 1); one EPS amphibian and two EPS reptiles that are all Endangered removed from Annex 2 – these species were included in Version 2 and/or 2.1 in error. See Annex 1 and Annex 2 for further information. 1. Introduction Every five years, the country nature conservation bodies (Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and NatureScot), working jointly through the UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), review Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (WCA) 1981. The review will provide recommendations to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and to Ministers for the Environment in the Scottish Government and Welsh Government for changes to these schedules2. This is known as the Quinquennial Review (QQR). As part of the QQR, stakeholders are provided with the opportunity to propose changes to the species on the schedules. This Information Pack has been produced for the 7th QQR (QQR 7). It is important to note that this QQR differs from previous ones. The Information Pack explains the new selection criteria, provides a timetable, and explains the process to be used by stakeholders. Contact details of the QQR Inter-agency Group who are managing QQR 7, are listed in Section 5. In addition, the Information Pack provides details of how to complete the online survey through which stakeholders propose new species for inclusion on, or removal of existing species from Schedules 5 and 8, or propose a change to how species are protected on the schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity of Insects Visiting Flowers of Saw Palmetto (Arecaceae)
    Deyrup & Deyrup: Insect Visitors of Saw Palmetto Flowers 711 THE DIVERSITY OF INSECTS VISITING FLOWERS OF SAW PALMETTO (ARECACEAE) MARK DEYRUP1,* AND LEIF DEYRUP2 1Archbold Biological Station, 123 Main Drive, Venus, FL 33960 2Univ. of the Cumberlands, Williamsburg, KY 40769 *Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A survey of insect visitors on flowers ofSerenoa repens (saw palmetto) at a Florida site, the Archbold Biological Station, showed how nectar and pollen resources of a plant species can contribute to taxonomic diversity and ecological complexity. A list of 311 species of flower visitors was dominated by Hymenoptera (121 spp.), Diptera (117 spp.), and Coleoptera (52 spp.). Of 228 species whose diets are known, 158 are predators, 47 are phytophagous, and 44 are decomposers. Many species that visited S. repens flowers also visited flowers of other species at the Archbold Biological Station. The total number of known insect-flower relation- ships that include S. repens is 2,029. There is no evidence of oligolectic species that are de- pendent on saw palmetto flowers. This study further emphasizes the ecological importance and conservation value of S. repens. Key Words: pollination, flower visitor webs, pollinator diversity, floral resources, saw pal- metto, Serenoa repens RESUMEN Un estudio sobre los insectos que visitan las flores de Serenoa repens (palma enana ameri- cana o palmito de sierra) en un sitio de la Florida, la Estación Biológica Archbold, mostró cómo los recursos de néctar y polen de una especie vegetal puede contribuir a la diversidad taxonómica y complejidad ecológica. Una lista de 311 especies de visitantes de flores fue dominada por los Hymenóptera (121 spp.), Diptera (117 spp.) y Coleoptera (52 spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Family Descriptions
    FAMILY DESCRIPTIONS CAT = Although they do not contain keys, the identification references include recent cata- logues as valuable source on genera, species, distribution and references. CMPD = Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera. Lindner = Chapter in Lindner, E., Die Fliegen der Paläarktischen Region. ( ) Family names between brackets refer to names as found in the literature, not recognised here as a separate family but, as indicated, considered part of another family. et al. References with more than two authors are given as First author et al. As far as not yet outdated, the number of genera and species in Europe is largely based on the Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera, the CMPD and Fauna Europaea, the latter available online at: www.faunaeur.org (consulted was version 1.2, updated 7 March 2005). As to size, the following categories are distinguished: minute: smaller than 2 mm; small: 2- 5 mm; medium sized: 5-10 mm; large: 10-20 mm; very large: over 20 mm. Acartophthalmidae (key couplet 113; fig. 243) Systematics: Acalyptrate Brachycera; superfamily Opomyzoidea; in Europe 1 genus, Acartophthalmus, with 3 species. Characters: Minute to small (1-2.5 mm), brownish grey flies. Arista pubescent, ocelli present; Oc-bristles present; P-bris- tles strong, far apart, diverging; 3 pairs of F-bristles, curving obliquely out-backward, increasing in size, the upper pair the largest; scattered interfrontal setulae present; vibrissae absent but with a series of strong bristles near the vibrissal angle. Wing unmarked or tinged along costa; costa with a humeral break only; vein Sc complete; crossvein BM-Cu present; cell cup closed.
    [Show full text]
  • André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Addenda to the Insect Fauna of Al-Baha Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with Zoogeographical Notes Magdi S
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2016 VOL. 50, NOS. 19–20, 1209–1236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1103913 Addenda to the insect fauna of Al-Baha Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with zoogeographical notes Magdi S. El-Hawagrya,c, Mostafa R. Sharafb, Hathal M. Al Dhaferb, Hassan H. Fadlb and Abdulrahman S. Aldawoodb aEntomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; bPlant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; cSurvey and Classification of Agricultural and Medical Insects in Al-Baha Province, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The first list of insects (Arthropoda: Hexapoda) of Al-Baha Received 1 April 2015 Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) was published in 2013 Accepted 30 September 2015 and contained a total of 582 species. In the present study, 142 Online 9 December 2015 species belonging to 51 families and representing seven orders KEYWORDS are added to the fauna of Al-Baha Province, bringing the total Palaearctic; Afrotropical; number of species now recorded from the province to 724. The Eremic; insect species; reported species are assigned to recognized regional zoogeogra- Arabian Peninsula; Tihama; phical regions. Seventeen of the species are recorded for the first Al-Sarah; Al-Sarawat time for KSA, namely: Platypleura arabica Myers [Cicadidae, Mountains Hemiptera]; Cletomorpha sp.; Gonocerus juniperi Herrich-Schäffer [Coreidae, Hemiptera]; Coranus lateritius (Stål); Rhynocoris bipus- tulatus (Fieber) [Reduviidae, Hemiptera]; Cantacader iranicus Lis; Dictyla poecilla Drake & Hill [Tingidae, Hemiptera]; Mantispa scab- ricollis McLachlan [Mantispidae, Neuroptera]; Cerocoma schreberi Fabricius [Meloidae, Coleoptera]; Platypus parallelus (Fabricius) [Curculionidae, Coleoptera]; Zodion cinereum (Fabricius) [Conopidae, Diptera]; Ulidia ?ruficeps Becker [Ulidiidae, Diptera]; Atherigona reversura Villeneuve [Muscidae, Diptera]; Aplomya metallica (Wiedemann); Cylindromyia sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspecific Pollen on Insects Visiting Female Flowers of Phoradendron Juniperinum (Viscaceae) in Western Arizona
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 77 Number 4 Article 7 1-16-2017 Conspecific pollen on insects visiting emalef flowers of Phoradendron juniperinum (Viscaceae) in western Arizona William D. Wiesenborn [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Wiesenborn, William D. (2017) "Conspecific pollen on insects visiting emalef flowers of Phoradendron juniperinum (Viscaceae) in western Arizona," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 77 : No. 4 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol77/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 77(4), © 2017, pp. 478–486 CONSPECIFIC POLLEN ON INSECTS VISITING FEMALE FLOWERS OF PHORADENDRON JUNIPERINUM (VISCACEAE) IN WESTERN ARIZONA William D. Wiesenborn1 ABSTRACT.—Phoradendron juniperinum (Viscaceae) is a dioecious, parasitic plant of juniper trees ( Juniperus [Cupressaceae]) that occurs from eastern California to New Mexico and into northern Mexico. The species produces minute, spherical flowers during early summer. Dioecious flowering requires pollinating insects to carry pollen from male to female plants. I investigated the pollination of P. juniperinum parasitizing Juniperus osteosperma trees in the Cerbat Mountains in western Arizona during June–July 2016. I examined pollen from male flowers, aspirated insects from female flowers, counted conspecific pollen grains on insects, and estimated floral constancy from proportions of conspecific pollen in pollen loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Huchard Et Al., 2006 1.Pdf
    Acetylcholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies Elise Huchard, Michel Martinez, Haoues Alout, Emmanuel Douzery, Georges Lutfalla, Arnaud Berthomieu, Claire Berticat, Michel Raymond, Mylene Weill To cite this version: Elise Huchard, Michel Martinez, Haoues Alout, Emmanuel Douzery, Georges Lutfalla, et al.. Acetyl- cholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2006, 273 (1601), pp.2595-2604. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3621. hal-01945529 HAL Id: hal-01945529 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01945529 Submitted on 29 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Proc. R. Soc. B (2006) 273, 2595–2604 doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3621 Published online 18 July 2006 Acetylcholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies Elise Huchard1, Michel Martinez2, Haoues Alout1, Emmanuel J. P. Douzery1, Georges Lutfalla3, Arnaud Berthomieu1, Claire Berticat1, Michel Raymond1,* and Myle`ne Weill1 1Institut des Sciences
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Empidoidea (Diptera)
    ZOOTAXA 1180 The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) (Zootaxa 1180) 172 pp.; 30 cm. 21 Apr. 2006 ISBN 1-877407-79-8 (paperback) ISBN 1-877407-80-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2006 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41383 Auckland 1030 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2006 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) Zootaxa 1180: 1–172 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1180 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR1 & JEFFREY M. CUMMING2 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Invertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, C.E.F., Ottawa, ON, Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    PDF file from Evenhuis, N.L. & D.J. Greathead, 1999, World Catalog of Bee Flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. xlviii + ix 756 pp. INTRODUCTION Bombyliids, or bee flies as they are commonly called, comprise a diverse and speciose assemblage of brachycerous flies. With more than 4,500 species known worldwide, they are one of the largest families of Diptera, surpassed in numbers of species only by the Tipulidae (14,000), Tachinidae (9,200), Syrphidae (5,800), Asilidae (5,600), Ceratopogonidae (5,300), and Dolichopodidae (5,100). They occur in a variety of habitats and ecosystems (from ca. 10 km from the Arctic Ocean in Canada through all latitudes as far south as Tierra del Fuego; and at altitudes from over 3500 m in the Himalayas to 200 m below sea level at the shores of the Dead Sea). They are found on all continents except Antarctica and also many oceanic islands. The family has a remarkable range in size (from some Exoprosopa with wingspans of more than 60 mm to the tiny Apolysis that can be as small as 1.5 mm in length) and variety of shapes (e.g., Systropus mimicking ammophiline wasps; Bombomyia mimic- king bumblebees). The adults of the larger species are powerful and agile fliers, rivaling the syrphid flies in their ability to hover and move in all directions while in flight. With many species possessing colorful patterns of stripes and spots on the wings and bodies, bee flies are often some of the most striking in appearance of all the Diptera. Individuals can often be seen either resting in the open on trails or on rocks or twigs sunning themselves, or feeding on a variety of flowering plants.
    [Show full text]