DOCSLIB.ORG

Huchard Et Al., 2006 1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Acetylcholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies Elise Huchard, Michel Martinez, Haoues Alout, Emmanuel Douzery, Georges Lutfalla, Arnaud Berthomieu, Claire Berticat, Michel Raymond, Mylene Weill To cite this version: Elise Huchard, Michel Martinez, Haoues Alout, Emmanuel Douzery, Georges Lutfalla, et al.. Acetyl- cholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2006, 273 (1601), pp.2595-2604. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3621. hal-01945529 HAL Id: hal-01945529 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01945529 Submitted on 29 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Proc. R. Soc. B (2006) 273, 2595–2604 doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3621 Published online 18 July 2006 Acetylcholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies Elise Huchard1, Michel Martinez2, Haoues Alout1, Emmanuel J. P. Douzery1, Georges Lutfalla3, Arnaud Berthomieu1, Claire Berticat1, Michel Raymond1,* and Myle`ne Weill1 1Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution (UMR 5554 CNRS), C.C. 065, and 3UMR 5124 CNRS, C.C.86, Universite´ de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France 2INRA, Unite´ d’Ecologie animale et Zoologie agricole, 2, place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 01, France It has recently been reported that the synaptic acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in mosquitoes is encoded by the ace-1 gene, distinct and divergent from the ace-2 gene, which performs this function in Drosophila.Thisisan unprecedented situation within the Diptera order because both ace genes derive from an old duplication and are present in most insects and arthropods. Nevertheless, Drosophila possesses only the ace-2 gene. Thus, a secondary loss occurred during the evolution of Diptera, implying a vital function switch from one gene (ace-1) to the other (ace-2). We sampled 78 species, representing 50 families (27% of the Dipteran families) spread over all major subdivisions of the Diptera, and looked for ace-1 and ace-2 by systematic PCR screening to determine which taxonomic groups within the Diptera have this gene change. We show that this loss probably extends to all true flies (or Cyclorrhapha), a large monophyletic group of the Diptera. We also show that ace-2 plays a non-detectable role in the synaptic AChE in a lower Diptera species, suggesting that it has non-synaptic functions. A relative molecular evolution rate test showed that the intensity of purifying selection on ace-2 sequences is constant across the Diptera, irrespective of the presence or absence of ace-1, confirming the evolutionary importance of non-synaptic functions for this gene. We discuss the evolutionary scenarios for the takeover of ace-2 and the loss of ace-1, taking into account our limited knowledge of non-synaptic functions of ace genes and some specific adaptations of true flies. Keywords: acetylcholinesterase; evolution of gene function; Diptera; duplication; gene loss 1. INTRODUCTION ace-2 (e.g. in flies) encodes the main AChE, implying that The recent discovery of the gene coding of the synaptic ace-2 took over the function of ace-1 during evolution. acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in mosquitoes has led to a The synaptic AChE is involved in a vital function, and it paradox in their evolution. AChE stops neurotransmission is assumed that this function has always been present in the sensorial synapses of insects by hydrolysing the during the evolution of insects. Apparently, AChE has neurotransmitter acetylcholine (Toutant 1 989). The been naturally selected for its particularly high enzymatic Anopheles gambiae genome contains two ace genes: ace-1, activity. It is one of the fastest known enzymes with up to which encodes the main synaptic AChE (Weill et al. 2002) 104 substrate molecules being hydrolysed per second by and ace-2, which has an unknown function. These two each enzyme molecule, and its enzymatic velocity seems to genes have only 53% similarity at the amino acid level, and be limited only by the diffusion velocity of its substrate the overall ace phylogeny suggests that they diverged (Quinn 1987). This suggests that a slight reduction in its before the diversification of the arthropods (Weill et al. activity would somehow be translated to a significant 2002). Thus, both genes should be present in most fitness cost. In the mosquito Culex pipiens, a variant arthropods and have already been formally identified in synaptic AChE (coded by ace-1) differing by one amino Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera and Acari acid (glycine 119 changed to serine, or G119S) is found in (Weill et al. 2002; Li & Han 2004; Russell et al. 2004; insecticide-treated areas. This variant is insensitive to Lee et al. 2006). By contrast, the Drosophila melanogaster some insecticides and has a 60% reduced activity, which is genome contains a single gene, ace-2 (Weill et al. 2002), associated with substantial fitness cost: about 11% per which encodes the synaptic AChE (Fournier et al. 1989). generation during the breeding season and 50–60% for The absence of ace-1 in the D. melanogaster genome can survival during the overwintering season (Lenormand therefore be explained by a secondary loss. Consequently, et al.1998; Lenormand et al. 1999; Lenormand & within the Diptera, either ace-1 (e.g. in mosquitoes) or Raymond 2000). The G119S mutation has also been detected in insecticide-resistant individuals in distant mosquito species (An. gambiae and An. albimanus, Weill * Author for correspondence ([email protected]). et al. 2004), suggesting that the AChE function cannot be greatly modified (to increase insensitivity to some The electronic supplementary material is available at http://dx.doi. org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3621 or via http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac. insecticides) without greatly affecting its optimal and uk. vital activity. Received 19 January 2006 2595 q 2006 The Royal Society Accepted 13 May 2006 2596 E. Huchard and others Gene takeover and loss in true flies Despite these physiological constraints, the gene (AJ748115); Schizaphis graminum (Q9BMJ1). All these ace-1 encoding the synaptic AChE has apparently changed sequences were used to design four pairs of primers: Moustdir within the Diptera, with the ancestral gene (ace-1) being (50 CCG-GGN-GCS-ACY-ATG-TGG-AA 30) with Mous- replaced by a divergent and distant gene (ace-2). This type trev (50 ACG-ATM-ACG-TTC-TCY-TCC-GA 30); P6dir of gene replacement, which pertains to a vital function, has (50ATM-GWG-TTY-GAG-TAC-ACS-GAY-TGG 30) with never been observed previously (to our knowledge), and P7rev (50 GGC-AAA-RTT-KGW-CCA-GTA-TCK-CAT thus we have no conceptual framework for understanding 30); Ace1dir3 (50 GAC-AAR-ATG-GTS-GGN-GAY- how such a phenomenon is possible and what sort of TAT-CA 30) with Ace1rev4 (50 CCR-TGC-ATM-ACR- selection has driven it. The Ao (aldehyde oxidase) gene in CCN-GTC-CA 30) or with P7rev. Polymerase chain reaction eukaryotes underwent a possibly related change; it derives (PCR) comprised 35 cycles of 93 8C for 30 s, 50 8C for 30 s neofunctionalization from a duplicate copy of Xdh and 72 8C for 30 s. These four pairs of primers were (xanthine dehydrogenase), and Xdh underwent a second systematically used for all samples. duplication in chordates. The new duplicated copy We amplified ace-2 using two pairs of degenerate primers: became a neofunctionalized Ao gene, with the first Ao ace2dir4 (50AAY-GCN-CCS-TGG-AGY-CAY-ATG-AC 30) gene subsequently disappearing from the vertebrate with ace2rev6 (50 CCV-GAR-TAS-GAR-TTC-CAY-TGY- genome (Rodriguez-Trelles et al. 2003). However, the TG 30), and ace2dir3 (50 TGG-ATY-TAY-GGB-GGY-GGS- Ao/Xdh and ace-1/ace-2 situations cannot be directly TTY-ATG 30) with ace2rev3 (50 GTC-ATR-TGR-CTC-C compared because the loss of ace-1 is not associated with AS-GGN-GCR-TT 30). These were designed by comparing anewace-2 copy, which could have acquired (by published ace-2 sequences from distant Diptera species: neofunctionalization) the same functions as ace-1. D. melanogaster (P07140), M. domestica (Q8MXC4), The first step in understanding this situation is to Lucilia cuprina (P91954), B. oleae (Q8MVZ4), An. gambiae determine which taxonomic groups within the Diptera (Q869C3) and C. pipiens (Q86GC8). The first pair of primers display this gene change. There are about 129 000 species was systematically used, with the second being used if the first described within the Diptera order, distributed among pair failed. 185 families (McAlpine & Wood 1989; Grimaldi & Engel PCR products were directly sequenced with an ABI prism 2005; plus update from M.M.). The main synaptic AChE 310 sequencer using the Big Dye Terminator kit. is encoded by ace-1 in Culex and Anopheles mosquitoes (Culicidae family), and by ace-2 in D. melanogaster. Both (c) Diptera phylogeny the housefly Musca domestica and the olive fruitfly The phylogenetic topology of the major taxonomic divisions Bactrocera oleae use ace-2 for their cholinergic synapses, in Diptera (infraorders or superfamilies illustrated in figure 1) as shown by ace-2 mutations providing insecticide and the identification of monophyletic groups were estab- resistance (Kozaki et al. 2001a; Walsh et al. 2001; Vontas lished according to published data (table 1; McAlpine & et al. 2002). Currently, there is no information available Wood 1989; Wiegmann 1993; Griffiths 1994; Cumming et al.
Recommended publications
  • Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera

    Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera

    Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera • The Panorpida contain 5 orders: the Mecoptera, Siphonaptera, Diptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. • Available evidence clearly indicates that the Lepidoptera and the Trichoptera are sister groups. • The Siphonaptera and Mecoptera are also closely related but it is not clear whether the Siponaptera is the sister group of all of the Mecoptera or a group (Boreidae) within the Mecoptera. If the latter is true, then the Mecoptera is paraphyletic as currently defined. • The Diptera is the sister group of the Siphonaptera + Mecoptera and together make up the Mecopteroids. • The Hymenoptera does not appear to be closely related to any of the other holometabolous orders. Mecoptera (Scorpionflies, hangingflies) • Classification. 600 species worldwide, arranged into 9 families (5 in the US). A very old group, many fossils from the Permian (260 mya) onward. • Structure. Most distinctive feature is the elongated clypeus and labrum that together form a rostrum. The order gets its common name from the gential segment of the male in the family Panorpodiae, which is bulbous and often curved forward above the abdomen, like the sting of a scorpion. Larvae are caterpillar-like or grub- like. • Natural history. Scorpionflies are most common in cool, moist habitats. They get the name “hangingflies” from their habit of hanging upside down on vegetation. Larvae and adult males are mostly predators or scavengers. Adult females are usually scavengers. Larvae and adults in some groups may feed on vegetation. Larvae of most species are terrestrial and caterpillar-like in body form. Larvae of some species are aquatic. In the family Bittacidae males attract females for mating by releasing a sex pheromone and then presenting the female with a nuptial gift.
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past

    R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past

    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
  • Phasenverschobene Häufigkeit Der Raupenfliege Tachina Grossa

    Phasenverschobene Häufigkeit Der Raupenfliege Tachina Grossa

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 0027 Autor(en)/Author(s): Reichholf Josef H. Artikel/Article: Phasenverschobene Häufigkeit der Raupenfliege Tachina grossa (LINNAEUS, 1758) und des Eichenspinners Lasiocampa quercus (LINNAEUS, 1758) im Wald an der Isar südlich von München (Diptera: Tachinidae / Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). 412-415 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Phasenverschobene Häufigkeit der Raupenfliege Tachina grossa (LINNAEUS, 1758) und des Eichenspinners Lasiocampa quercus (LINNAEUS, 1758) im Wald an der Isar südlich von München (Diptera: Tachinidae / Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) Josef H. Reichholf Abstract Phase shifted abundance of the Echinomyid fly Tachina grossa (LINNAEUS, 1758) and its prey, the Oak Eggar Moth Lasiocampa quercus (LINNAEUS, 1758)in the woodland south of Munich. - Tachina grossa, the largest of the European Tachinid species, occurred in the summers of 2003 and 2004 in the pine forest adjacent to the river Isar south of Munich along a regularly counted line transect of 400 metres length. A comparison with the abundance of the Oak Eggar moth Lasiocampa quercus (LINNAEUS, 1758) along the same transect showed that the Tachinid “followed” with delay on a period of elevated abundance of the moth (cf. fig. 1) and vanished when levels of the moth’s abundance lowered again in 2005 and 2006. The parasitic fly’s flight period is also shifted by roughly one month compared to the Oak Eggar (cf. fig. 2). Though widespread, the large Tachinid fly is not really abundant and fluctuates in places and time. Zusammenfassung Tachina grossa (LINNAEUS, 1758), die größte europäische Raupenfliege, kam in den Sommern von 2003 und 2004 entlang der 400 m langen Linientransekte vor, an denen im Kiefernwald an der Isar südlich von München regelmäßig Zählungen von Schmetterlingen vorgenommen wurden.
  • Testing Agricultural Impacts on Breeding Ground Food Resources As a Driver of Cuckoo Population Decline

    Testing Agricultural Impacts on Breeding Ground Food Resources As a Driver of Cuckoo Population Decline

    Testing agricultural impacts on breeding ground food resources as a driver of cuckoo population decline Submitted by Lowell John Mills to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences, March 2019 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. 1 2 Image: Charles Tyler “The first picture of you, The first picture of summer, Seeing the flowers scream their joy.” - The Lotus Eaters (1983) 3 4 Abstract The common cuckoo Cuculus canorus has undergone a striking divergence in population trend between UK habitats since the 1980s. The breeding population in Scotland – in largely semi-natural open habitat – shows significant increase whereas there has been a significant decline in England. Here breeding numbers have remained stable or increased in semi-natural habitats, while woodland and farmland populations have plummeted. As a brood parasitic bird with a long-distance annual migration, the cuckoo has a unique network of relationships to songbird „hosts‟, prey and habitat; and a disconnection between adult and nestling ecology due to lack of parental care. This thesis investigated the role of breeding ground land-use factors in driving cuckoo population decline. In the first chapter information was synthesised from the literature on potential threats and environmental impacts facing cuckoo populations, which also highlighted knowledge gaps and a basis for hypotheses in later chapters.
  • Long‐Term Changes in the Abundance of Flying Insects

    Long‐Term Changes in the Abundance of Flying Insects

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Rothamsted Repository Insect Conservation and Diversity (2009) 2, 251–260 doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00062.x Long-term changes in the abundance of flying insects CHRIS R. SHORTALL, ALISON MOORE, EMMA SMITH, MIKE J. HALL, IAN P. WOIWOD and RICHARD HARRINGTON Plant and Invertebrate Ecology Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK Abstract. 1. For the first time, long-term changes in total aerial insect biomass have been estimated for a wide area of Southern Britain. 2. Various indices of biomass were created for standardised samples from four of the Rothamsted Insect Survey 12.2 m tall suction traps for the 30 years from 1973 to 2002. 3. There was a significant decline in total biomass at Hereford but not at three other sites: Rothamsted, Starcross and Wye. 4. For the Hereford samples, many insects were identified at least to order level, some to family or species level. These samples were then used to investigate the taxa involved in the decline in biomass at Hereford. 5. The Hereford samples were dominated by large Diptera, particularly Dilophus febrilis, which showed a significant decline in abundance. 6. Changes in agricultural practice that could have contributed to the observed declines are discussed, as are potential implications for farmland birds, with sugges- tions for further work to investigate both cause and effect. Key words. Biodiversity, biomass, Diptera, long-term monitoring, suction trap. Introduction undergone well-documented declines in recent years. These declines coincided with a period of agricultural intensification There is widespread concern over biodiversity extinction rates (Buckwell & Armstrong-Brown, 2004; Buckingham et al., 2006), and their impact on the human species (Pimm et al., 1995).
  • Diptera, Tabanoidea, Tabanidae) Dorian D

    Diptera, Tabanoidea, Tabanidae) Dorian D

    Dörge et al. Parasites Vectors (2020) 13:461 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04316-7 Parasites & Vectors RESEARCH Open Access Incompletely observed: niche estimation for six frequent European horsefy species (Diptera, Tabanoidea, Tabanidae) Dorian D. Dörge1*, Sarah Cunze1 and Sven Klimpel1,2 Abstract Background: More than 170 species of tabanids are known in Europe, with many occurring only in limited areas or having become very rare in the last decades. They continue to spread various diseases in animals and are responsible for livestock losses in developing countries. The current monitoring and recording of horsefies is mainly conducted throughout central Europe, with varying degrees of frequency depending on the country. To the detriment of tabanid research, little cooperation exists between western European and Eurasian countries. Methods: For these reasons, we have compiled available sources in order to generate as complete a dataset as possi- ble of six horsefy species common in Europe. We chose Haematopota pluvialis, Chrysops relictus, C. caecutiens, Tabanus bromius, T. bovinus and T. sudeticus as ubiquitous and abundant species within Europe. The aim of this study is to esti- mate the distribution, land cover usage and niches of these species. We used a surface-range envelope (SRE) model in accordance with our hypothesis of an underestimated distribution based on Eurocentric monitoring regimes. Results: Our results show that all six species have a wide range in Eurasia, have a broad climatic niche and can there- fore be considered as widespread generalists. Areas with modelled habitat suitability cover the observed distribution and go far beyond these. This supports our assumption that the current state of tabanid monitoring and the recorded distribution signifcantly underestimates the actual distribution.
  • Larger Brachycera Newsletter 27B.Pdf

    Larger Brachycera Newsletter 27B.Pdf

    Larger Brachycera Recording Scheme Newsletter 27 Winter 2008 ISSN 1359-5029 CONTENTS From the Scheme Organiser – call in for records Simon Hayhow Asilidae A Further Record of Choerades marginatus (L.) in Norfolk Steve Crellin Bombyliidae Observations on egg-laying by Bombylius minor L. Ian Cross Tabanidae The Highland Horsefly Recording Project Philip F Entwistle The Highland Horsefly Recording Project (2004-05) Philip F Entwistle From the Scheme Organiser Call-in for Larger Brachycera Records I must apologise for the less than satisfactory feedback, due to family illness and moving to Scotland. This was at a time when we were moving towards the proposed atlas. However, assistance from the Biological Records Centre (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology) is getting things back on track. I would like to thank the staff there for their help. This is now a call-in for all Larger Brachycera records not already submitted to the Scheme. The plan was for you to have this winter to identify and collate, submitting any new/outstand- ing records by 31st March, 2008. However, as the L.B. Newsletter did not appear last time (Darwyn’s computer crashed and it was lost) you will need sufficient notice. Therefore, you will have another field season but all records are required by 30th September, 2008. Even if you onlyhave a handful of records of the commoner species,please send them as they all help to build up the picture of distribution and phenology; do not assume they will come via other sources, please send your original data. It is planned to make all the data available through the NBN Gateway in due course.
  • Table of Contents 2

    Table of Contents 2

    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
  • 6. Bremsen Als Parasiten Und Vektoren

    6. Bremsen Als Parasiten Und Vektoren

    DIPLOMARBEIT / DIPLOMA THESIS Titel der Diplomarbeit / Title of the Diploma Thesis „Blutsaugende Bremsen in Österreich und ihre medizini- sche Relevanz“ verfasst von / submitted by Manuel Vogler angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister der Naturwissenschaften (Mag.rer.nat.) Wien, 2019 / Vienna, 2019 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 190 445 423 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Lehramtsstudium UF Biologie und Umweltkunde degree programme as it appears on UF Chemie the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Andreas Hassl Danksagung Hiermit möchte ich mich sehr herzlich bei Herrn ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Andreas Hassl für die Vergabe und Betreuung dieser Diplomarbeit bedanken. Seine Unterstützung und zahlreichen konstruktiven Anmerkungen waren mir eine ausgesprochen große Hilfe. Weiters bedanke ich mich bei meiner Mutter Karin Bock, die sich stets verständnisvoll ge- zeigt und mich mein ganzes Leben lang bei all meinen Vorhaben mit allen ihr zur Verfügung stehenden Kräften und Mitteln unterstützt hat. Ebenso bedanke ich mich bei meiner Freundin Larissa Sornig für ihre engelsgleiche Geduld, die während meiner zahlreichen Bremsenjagden nicht selten auf die Probe gestellt und selbst dann nicht überstrapaziert wurde, als sie sich während eines Ausflugs ins Wenger Moor als ausgezeichneter Bremsenmagnet erwies. Auch meiner restlichen Familie gilt mein Dank für ihre fortwährende Unterstützung.
  • A Review of the Status of Larger Brachycera Flies of Great Britain

    A Review of the Status of Larger Brachycera Flies of Great Britain

    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR192 A review of the status of Larger Brachycera flies of Great Britain Acroceridae, Asilidae, Athericidae Bombyliidae, Rhagionidae, Scenopinidae, Stratiomyidae, Tabanidae, Therevidae, Xylomyidae. Species Status No.29 First published 30th August 2017 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Making good decisions to conserve species This report should be cited as: should primarily be based upon an objective process of determining the degree of threat to DRAKE, C.M. 2017. A review of the status of the survival of a species. The recognised Larger Brachycera flies of Great Britain - international approach to undertaking this is by Species Status No.29. Natural England assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat Commissioned Reports, Number192. categories. This report was commissioned to update the threat status of Larger Brachycera flies last undertaken in 1991, using a more modern IUCN methodology for assessing threat. Reviews for other invertebrate groups will follow. Natural England Project Manager - David Heaver, Senior Invertebrate Specialist [email protected] Contractor - C.M Drake Keywords - Larger Brachycera flies, invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0300 060 3900 or e-mail [email protected].
  • Insecta Diptera) in Freshwater (Excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel

    Insecta Diptera) in Freshwater (Excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel

    Entomology Publications Entomology 2008 Global diversity of dipteran families (Insecta Diptera) in freshwater (excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel Miroslav Barták Czech University of Agriculture Art Borkent Salmon Arm Gregory W. Courtney Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs BoudewPart ofijn the GoBddeeiodivrisersity Commons, Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the TRoyerarle Bestrlgiialan a Indnstit Aquaute of Nticat uErcaol Scienlogyce Cs ommons TheSee nex tompc page forle addte bitioniblaiol agruthorapshic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ ent_pubs/41. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Entomology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Global diversity of dipteran families (Insecta Diptera) in freshwater (excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Abstract Today’s knowledge of worldwide species diversity of 19 families of aquatic Diptera in Continental Waters is presented. Nevertheless, we have to face for certain in most groups a restricted knowledge about distribution, ecology and systematic,
  • Diptera) of the Czech Republic

    Diptera) of the Czech Republic

    © Entomologica Fennica. 30 March 2009 Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Republic Jaromir Vafihara*, Hans-Peter Tschorsnig, Benno Herting’r, Petr Mfickstein & Veronika Michalkova J P. & V. Vanhara, ., Tschorsnig, H.-P., Herting, B., Miickstein, Michalkova, 2009: Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Re- public. — Entomol. Fennica 20: 22—48. An annotated host catalogue is given for the Tachinidae ofthe Czech Republic. It comprises 149 of476 tachinid species which are currently known from this coun- try (included the two new records cited below). 195 hosts are listed. The first host records ofTachinidae date back to the second halfofthe 19th century. The bibli- ography for the host records consists of 1 16 papers of 55 researchers. Several re- cords of hitherto unpublished material are included. Phryxe setifacies and Anthomyiopsis plagioderae are first records for the Czech Republic. J. Vanhara (*corresponding author), Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] H.—P. Tschorsnig, Staatliches Museumflir Naturkunde, Rosenstein I, D— 70 191 Stuttgart, Germany, tschorsnig.smns@naturkundemuseum—bw.de P. Muckstein Administration of the Protected Landscape Area Zd’drske' vrchy, Brnenska 39, CZ—591 01 Zd’dr nad Sazavou, Czech Republic, muchstein @email.cz V. Michalkova, Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] Received 22 August 200 7, accepted 21 January 2008 1. Introduction The tachinid species are listed in their actual valid nomenclature; probable misidentifications Tachinidae are a very large and important dipter- are — if possible — tentatively corrected, but the an family of (mainly) insect parasitoids.