DOCSLIB.ORG

The Acela Express

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Acela Express Feature 40 Years of High-speed Railways The Acela Express R. Clifford Black Amtrak’s Acela Express high-speed trains emerged from the American railway 1910s. However, until the 11,000-Vac have helped the National Railroad boom. For a time, it adopted the advertising catenary system was built in the 1930s, Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) capture slogan, ‘The Standard Railroad of the steam locomotives took over at Manhattan more than half the combined air-and-rail World’ implying that it was the very best Transfer just 10 km from Pennsylvania Station. market between the terminal cities of and that all others should emulate it. No significant changes were made to Washington DC and New York. If Whether or not it was the best, the ‘Pennsy’ passenger train operations until the mid- intermediate cities such as Baltimore and (as it was nicknamed) was innovative and 1960s when Congress and others noted Philadelphia are included, Amtrak’s share forward-looking. During the 1930s, it the advances in rail technology in France of the air and rail markets is about 75%. undertook one of the nation’s most and Japan. Sleek shinkansen on the Between New York City and Boston, Acela ambitious public works projects of the Tokyo–Osaka route were making big Express has increased Amtrak’s share from time—to install catenary for electric news around the world with their time- 18% to 40%. The popular trains carry locomotives between New York City and shrinking cruising speeds of more than more than 2 million passengers annually, Washington DC. This could be considered 200 km/h. On America’s only significant or more than 10% of Amtrak’s 24 million as the first step in laying the groundwork electrified railway, trains hauled by then- passengers, accounting for about 25% of for the commencement of Acela Express 30-year-old locomotives were still Amtrak’s annual ticket revenue of more operations some 60 years later. cruising at 144 km/h, and were having to than $1 billion. The electrification of the Pennsylvania slow down over more sections as tracks Amtrak began operating Acela Express, Railway’s main line between New York and other infrastructure deteriorated the first regularly scheduled high-speed and Washington DC as well as several because of deferred maintenance. passenger train service in the USA, suburban commuter lines radiating from between Washington DC, New York City Philadelphia permitted faster schedules High Speed Ground and Boston in December 2000. However, and higher train frequencies on busy Transportation Act the idea of significantly increasing passenger and freight routes in the most passenger train speeds in the most densely congested region of the north-eastern US. Partially in response to these international populated region of the country had been The railway’s many tunnels under the developments, Congress passed the High a goal of city planners and railway Hudson and East rivers provided access Speed Ground Transportation Act of presidents since the 19th century. to its monumental Pennsylvania Station 1965, creating the Office of High Speed During the late 19th and early 20th in Manhattan and had been fitted with a Ground Transportation and appropriating centuries, the USA led the world in 650-V dc third rail during construction in $90 million for R&D in the field of faster railway building and operation. At one time, the US railway industry was the largest business enterprise in the fastest growing economy in the world. At its peak, it employed more than 1 million people, and spanned 400,000 km of lines. It is not an exaggeration to say that US railways helped build the new nation and define its culture. While the federal government offered land and tax incentives for railways to build new lines, for the most part, railway companies remained commercial entities not funded by government. Standard Railroad The Pennsylvania Railroad was among the large and powerful companies that Artist’s impression of Acela Express (Amtrak) 18 Japan Railway & Transport Review 40 • March 2005 Copyright © 2005 EJRCF. All rights reserved. ground-based transportation. Part of the committed billions of dollars to a tortuous right-of-way engineered in the funding was invested in a new railway comprehensive, national Interstate 19th century, another major technical test facility in Pueblo, Colorado, which highway system and commercial aviation shortcoming was the termination of the is still busy today as the Transportation was turning to jet aircraft in ever- electrification at New Haven, Technology Center, Inc., (TTCI) operated increasing numbers, serving government- Connecticut, not quite a third of the way by the Association of American Railways. backed airports and using from New York to Boston. The electric The only facility of its kind in the world, government-backed air traffic control. services changed to steam (and later many foreign rail operators and Facing this kind of subsidized diesel) at New Haven until the 1910s manufacturers use the TTCI for various competition, and receiving virtually no when the New York–New Haven section speed and reliability tests on both federal support, the private US railway was electrified. The remaining non- passenger and freight train equipment. industry was in desperate financial electrified section had been frequently But back in the 1960s, significant condition and needed to be relieved of seen as a candidate for installing catenary, advances in US railway technology were its loss-making passenger business. To but fundiing had always blocked these still a long way off. One experiment in meet this wish, Congress created the proposals. Clearly, to improve speeds, cut 1966 involved installing twin jet aeroplane National Railroad Passenger Corporation running times and provide efficient service, engines on the roof of an old DMU railcar. by passing the Rail Passenger Service Act the electrification had to be extended east The project, which ended almost as soon of 1970. The new passenger rail company and north beyond New Haven. This need as it began, turned out to be more of a stunt was named Amtrak—a contraction of was finally met by the NEHRIP. than a test programme. The M-497 test ‘American travel on track’ and services In the early 1990s, the late W. Graham vehicle attained a respectable speed of started on 1 May 1971. Claytor, Jr., Amtrak’s President, Chairman 293 km/h on its only run in northern Ohio The Metroliner was among the trains and CEO urged members of Congress to on the New York Central Railroad. While operated by the fledgling Amtrak on that give Amtrak money to extend the M-497 never ran again and was soon first day. They were considered the most electrification from New Haven to Boston scrapped, it still holds the all-time North successful passenger trains in the US and to upgrade signals, track and other American railway speed record. because they were relatively fast, ran on infrastructure in the process. In 1992, he a fairly frequent schedule and enjoyed a held a press conference in New York City’s niche market between their terminal cities Pennsylvania Station with US Senator Metroliner of New York City and Washington DC. Frank Lautenberg, Chairman of the Senate The main competition for the largely Appropriations Committee. They Meanwhile, the US Department of business-travel clientele was ‘shuttle’ announced the NEHRIP plan which Transportation was working on a more flights operated by Eastern Airlines would invest $1.2 billion of federal money practical approach—a train that became between Washington’s then National in infrastructure improvements to the known as the Metroliner. A consortium Airport and New York’s LaGuardia Airport. Boston line. But more than just of Westinghouse, General Electric, The Already the most densely populated infrastructure improvements, what Budd Company, and the Pennsylvania region of the US, the Northeast Corridor Lautenberg and Claytor wanted was a Railroad, combined their efforts to create (NEC) between Washington DC, New programme of study and engineering that a fleet of 50 stainless-steel EMU units. A York, and Boston was experiencing would lead to the acquisition of the Acela modified train set using these units growing congestion on the ground and in Express high-speed train sets some 7 years attained a speed of 267 km/h in tests on a the air, and the term gridlock came into later. (Unfortunately, Claytor died in 1994 specially prepared section in New Jersey. common usage to describe the mobility before his dream was realized.) Regular Metroliner services from January crisis. Clearly, there was need for more and 1969 reached speeds of 176 km/h. In better transportation options. The Northeast 1983, the Metroliner speed was raised to High Speed Rail Improvement Project Visits by Foreign Rolling Stock 200 km/h using more conventional (NEHRIP) was to be part of the solution. electric locomotive-hauled coaches. The busiest railway in the western Later in 1992, in a series of talks with the US passenger rail service was in decline hemisphere, Amtrak’s NEC between representatives of the Swedish State during the 1960s as a direct result of two Washington and Boston had been the only Railways, Claytor arranged to test sources of tremendous competitive major AC-electrified passenger line in the Sweden’s popular new X2000 tilting train pressure. The federal government had US since the 1930s. In addition to a on the NEC. It was both a publicity stunt Copyright © 2005 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 40 • March 2005 19 40 Years of High-speed Railways Acela Express Route Map Canada MA Boston-South Station, MA Boston Boston-Back Bay Station, MA NeNeww YYorkork Boston-Route 128, MA M. Downs was joined by Al Gore, the Vice Philadelphia Baltimore President of the US, and other dignitaries WWashingtonashington DC NY CT ProProvidence,vidence, RI at Washington DC’s Union Station to RI announce the selection of the Mexico NeNeww London, CT NeNeww HaHaven,ven, CT Bombardier–Alstom consortium as the Newark, NJ builder of Amtrak’s new high-speed trains.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak
    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 71.9 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department 10-88 Bomb Threat 10-16
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States
    Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies .
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway on the Economic Development of Prefecture-Level Cities Along the Line Based on DID Model
    E3S Web of Conferences 235, 01016 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123501016 NETID 2020 The Effect of Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway on the Economic Development of Prefecture-Level Cities Along the Line Based on DID Model Ma Yuzhou1 1School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China Abstract. High-speed railway has an essential impact on the economic and social development of the regions along the line. Based on the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway, this paper constructs the DID model and analyzes the impact of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway on the economic development of prefecture-level cities along the route from the empirical perspective. The empirical analysis results show that the Beijing- Shanghai high-speed railway has a significant negative impact on the per capita GDP of prefecture-level cities along the line in the short term, mainly because the agglomeration effect is greater than the diffusion effect. Therefore, small cities should actively think about how to deal with the agglomeration effect caused by the construction of high-speed rail. billion yuan. The line is a project with the most massive 1 Introduction scale and highest technique since the founding of China. The BSHSR, which owns faster speed, fewer stops, and Since the opening of Beijing-Tianjin intercity high-speed more running trains, adds a vital passenger transport railway in 2008, China's high-speed railway (abbreviated channel for the eastern region. BSHSR improves the to “HSR”, for short) has stepped into a rapid expansion transportation capacity of Beijing-Shanghai line, meets stage, and the "four vertical and four horizontal" HSR the ever-growing travel demand of passengers, and network planned and constructed by the state has taken strengthens the connection between the two urban clusters shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure.Pdf
    PAID Standard Presorted Presorted U.S. Postage Postage U.S. Permit #1608 Permit Baltimore, MD Baltimore, Graduation is approaching! Celebrate this milestone and significant achievement with The Ohio State University Alumni Association’s trip for graduating seniors, Classic Europe. UP TO $200 CLASSIC EUROPE This comprehensive tour offers the chance to visit some of the world’s UNLEASH YOUR INNER ADVENTURER. must-see destinations before settling down into a new job or graduate school. It offers the opportunity for fun, hassle-free travel with other graduates, insights into other people, places and cultures – a source of personal enrichment, SAVE experiences that broaden one’s worldview and provide an advantage in today’s global job market - a vacation to remember and a reward for all the hard work. Travelers see amazing sites, such as Big Ben, the Eiffel Tower, and the Roman Forum on this 12-day, 4-country exploration and can add a 5-day extension to relax in the Greek Isles and explore ancient Athens. Past travelers have commented, “This was a trip of a life-time” – “I learned a lot from other cultures and definitely grew as a person” and “Not only was this a vacation, it was a wake-up call to see the world!” Travelers can feel confident that they will get the most out of their time in Europe with the aid of a private tour director and local city historians. Education does not stop after graduation, it is a life-long process and travel is a fantastic way to augment one’s knowledge. After reviewing the information, we hope you’ll agree – this exciting adventure is the perfect way to celebrate! Best regards, Debbie Vargo OR VISIT WWW.AESU.COM/OSU-GRADTRIP VISIT OR FOR DETAILS OR TO BOOK, CALL 1-800-852-TOUR CALL BOOK, TO OR DETAILS FOR EARLY BIRD DISCOUNT - EARLY DECEMBER 3, 2019 IN FULL BY BOOK AND PAY Longaberger Alumni House Alumni Longaberger River Road 2200 Olentangy Ohio 43210 Columbus, Director, Alumni Tours The Ohio State University Alumni Association, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Trainset Presentation
    4/15/2015 California High-Speed Rail Common Level Boarding and Tier III Trainsets Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Level Boarding Workshop May 2015 1 Advantages of Common Level Boarding • Improved operations at common stations (TTC, Millbrae, Diridon) • Improved passenger circulation • Improved safety • Improved Reliability and Recovery Capabilities • Significantly reduced infrastructure costs • Improved system operations • Accelerated schedule for Level Boarding at all stations 2 1 4/15/2015 Goals for Commuter Trainset RFP • Ensure that Caltrain Vehicle Procurement does not preclude future Common Level Boarding Options • Ensure that capacity of an electrified Caltrain system is maximized • Identify strategies that maintain or enhance Caltrain capacity during transition to high level boarding • Develop transitional strategies for future integrated service 3 Request for Expressions of Interest • In January 2015 a REOI was released to identify and receive feedback from firms interested in competing to design, build, and maintain the high-speed rail trainsets for use on the California High-Speed Rail System. • The Authority’s order will include a base order and options up to 95 trainsets. 4 2 4/15/2015 Technical Requirements - Trainsets • Single level EMU: • Capable of operating in revenue service at speeds up to 354 km/h (220 mph), and • Based on a service-proven trainset in use in commercial high speed passenger service at least 300 km/h (186 mph) for a minimum of five years. 5 Technical Requirements - Trainsets • Width between 3.2 m (10.5 feet) to 3.4 m (11.17 feet) • Maximum Length of 205 m (672.6 feet). • Minimum of 450 passenger seats • Provide level boarding with a platform height above top of rail of 1219 mm – 1295 mm (48 inches – 51 inches) 6 3 4/15/2015 Submittal Information • Nine Expressions of Interest (EOI) have been received thus far.
    [Show full text]
  • $21.6 Million for NYC-Boston Track Work Metroliner to Carry 200 Congressmen
    Volume 1, No. 10 September 1, 1974 Metroliner To Carry 200 Congressmen The largest single movement of Members of Congress will take place on the afternoon of Friday, September 6th when an Amtrak Metroliner pulls out of Washington Union Terminal b?und for Philadelphia. Already more than two hundred legislators have signified their intent to make this trip and as we go to press the list is growing. Never before has Amtrak been asked to provide transportation for so large and so distinguished a group. It has been rumored that even the President or the Vice President designate may be among those traveling on this special train. Because of the special security precautions which prevail, it will not be known until departure time whether or not the President will be aboard. All of these dignitaries have been invited to travel to Philadelphia on Amtrak by Governor a·nd Mrs. Shapp of Pennsylvania on behalf of the present Governors of the Thirteen Original States for the Bicentennial re·convening of the First Continental Congress. Two hundred years ago on Continued on page 2, col. 1 $21.6 Million For NYC-Boston Track Work On Monday, July 22, the Secretary of Transportation . approved the purchase of seven turbine powered trains for operation between New York and Boston. This release was important not only because it would bring the new French Turboliner to the east coast corridor; but because it went on to say that Amtrak planning for the northeast corridor included a "sharp reduction" in travel time for that segment "better track" and the "three and one-half hour" time frame and "improvement in the roadbed." leads to but one conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Train for the 21St Century
    A train for the 21st century Operating at speeds of 240 km/h, the ‘Acela Express’, the fastest train in North America, will soon revive a link with the epic railroad days on the new continent, using Nomex® brand paper for electrical insulation n the 10th of May, 1869, in Promonto- New York and Boston to just under 3 hours Richardson, Amtrak’s vice-president for mar- video facilities, sockets for portable comput- ican high-speed train is making its appearance in procedures, quicker boarding times and Ory, a tiny settlement in Utah, the Union and between New York and Washington to 2 keting and communications, “convey a brand ers with modem connection and a sit-down on the North-east Corridor network, from immediate luggage availability. Pacific and the Central Pacific Railroad lines hours and 45 minutes. new experience in rail travel.” dining service. The cars, which are designed Boston in the north to Washington in the south, Rail travel is also more comfortable, more were joined to complete the very first Passengers will embark for their 240 km/h to be accessible to persons with limited mobil- since this region is the most densely populated economical, less energy intensive and virtual- transcontinental rail link between the east and journey at the venerable Grand Central Sta- Unparalleled comfort and service ity, will have wide corridors, toilet facilities, in the United States and has the most heavily ly pollution-free. Indeed, the success of the west coasts of the United States. The railroad tion, in the centre of Manhattan, and will Apart from speed, Amtrak, operator of the plenty of room for passengers, pay-phones congested transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Next-Generation Tilting Train by Hybrid Tilt System A
    Development of Next-generation Tilting Train by Hybrid Tilt System A.Shikimura1, T. Inaba1, H.Kakinuma1, I.Sato1, Y.Sato1, K.Sasaki2, M.Hirayama3 1Hokkaido Railway Company, Sapporo, Japan; 2Railway Technical Research Institute, Kokubunji, Japan; 3Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd., Kobe, Japan [Abstract] To shorten train arrival time in existing railway lines (with a gauge of 1067mm), JR Hokkaido has improved running speed and acceleration and deceleration performance by solving Hokkaido’s regional problems of heavy snowfall and extremely severe cold and developed the capability to run on a curve section by our specific tilt-controlled vehicle system. Furthermore, to improve curving performance, this operating company developed “hybrid tilt system,” which can achieve a car body tilt angle of 8 degrees, by introducing the conventional “tilt system (curve guide type, tilt angle of 6 degrees)” and an “air spring car body tilt system (tilt angle of 2 degrees)” combined in cooperative control. This system is characterized by the reduction in tilt angel to 6 degrees on a curve in the conventional tilt-controlled system and another tilt angle of 2 degrees in a new tilting mechanism comprising the air spring on the outer rail side, thereby reducing the centrifugal force on a passenger. Meanwhile, since the motion of the center of gravity toward the outer rail side can be reduced by 25%, passenger’s riding comfort can be improved, which cannot be achieved in a single natural tilting vehicle with the same tilt angle. This paper outlines “hybrid tilt system” in this development project and provides cooperative control method for the 2 systems and the results of a stationary test.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Ground Transportation Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment
    High-Speed Ground Transportation U.S. Department of Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Policy and Development Washington, DC 20590 Final Report DOT/FRA/ORD-12/15 September 2012 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tampa to Orlando High-Speed Rail Project: Florida Taxpayer Risk Assessment by Wendell Cox Project Director: Robert W
    Reason Foundation Policy Brief 95 January 2011 The Tampa to Orlando High-Speed Rail Project: Florida Taxpayer Risk Assessment by Wendell Cox Project Director: Robert W. Poole, Jr. Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c) (3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corpora- tions. The views are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. While the authors of this study and Reason Foundation may hold some differing views about the proper role of govern- ment in society, Reason Foundation believes this study offers valuable policy analysis and recommendations. Copyright © 2011 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 The Tampa To Orlando High-Speed Rail Project ......................................................... 2 The Risk To Florida Taxpayers ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]