DOCSLIB.ORG

Elegant Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elegant Report Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee PENNSYLVANIA STATEWIDE PASSENGER RAIL NEEDS ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2001 Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................................................4 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................5 1.1 Study Background........................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Study Purpose...............................................................................................................................................5 1.3 Corridors Identified .....................................................................................................................................6 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................7 3.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ON CANDIDATE CORRIDORS .................................................14 3.1 Existing Intercity Rail Service...................................................................................................................14 3.1.1 Keystone Corridor ................................................................................................................................14 3.1.2 Capitol Limited ....................................................................................................................................15 3.1.3 Pennsylvanian—Three Rivers..............................................................................................................15 3.1.4 Lake Shore Limited..............................................................................................................................15 3.1.5 Northeast Corridor................................................................................................................................16 3.2 Intercity Bus Service ..................................................................................................................................16 3.2.1 Greyhound Bus Service............................................................................................................................16 3.2.2 Trailways..............................................................................................................................................17 3.3 Other State Research and additional passenger rail studies ..................................................................19 3.3.1 Other States ..........................................................................................................................................19 3.3.2 Additional Passenger Rail Studies .......................................................................................................25 3.4 Statewide and regional Interests...............................................................................................................27 3.4.1 Regional Meeting Results ....................................................................................................................28 3.4.2 Planning Partners Input ............................................................................................................................33 3.4.3 Rail FREIGHT Interests.......................................................................................................................36 4.0 CANDIDATE CORRIDOR ANALYSIS ......................................................................................37 4.1 Corridor Screening and Evaluation .........................................................................................................37 4.1.1 Infrastructure and Right-of-Way Availability......................................................................................38 4.1.2 Major Destinations and Trip Generators ..............................................................................................38 4.1.3 Market Size ..........................................................................................................................................38 4.1.4 Transportation Patterns and Conditions ...............................................................................................39 4.1.5 System Continuity and Connectivity....................................................................................................39 4.2 Prioritize corridors.....................................................................................................................................39 PAGE 2 Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee 5.0 FUTURE POLICY FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................42 5.1 National Context.........................................................................................................................................43 6.0 CORRIDOR PROFILES ............................................................................................................52 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................53 Appendix A – Corridors Evaluated and Descriptions Appendix B – Amtrak’s Pennsylvania Rail Service Schedules Appendix C – Cities/Centers Served by Greyhound Appendix D – Intercity Service Provided by the Trailways System in the Northeastern U.S. Appendix E – Letter Mailed to Regional Meeting Participants Appendix F – Regional Meeting PowerPoint Presentation Appendix G – Regional Meeting Focus Group Questions Appendix H – Regional Meeting Summaries Appendix I – Corridor Ranking Rationale PAGE 3 Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Gannett Fleming, Inc. wishes to thank the members of the State Transportation Advisory Committee Study Task Force for their guidance, insights, and ongoing participation as we conducted this important study. We appreciate their constructive dialogue, incisive review of materials, and participation in the many meetings. Task Force Members: Chairman: Brad Cober, Commissioner, Somerset County Members: H. Michael Liptak, TAC Chairman Andrew Galloway, Senior Director, Transportation Planning and Policy, Amtrak Larry King, Deputy Secretary for Planning, PENNDOT Joseph Mangarella, TAC Member Georgia Masters-Earp, Community and Economic Development, TAC Member Richard Peltz, Deputy Secretary for Local and Area Transportation, PENNDOT Robert Roush, Pennsylvania Department of Education, TAC Member Bill Schafer, Director of Corporate Affairs, Norfolk Southern Corporation David E. Sims, P.E., TAC Member Fred Wertz, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, TAC Member PENNDOT Staff: James Arey, Center for Program Development & Management James Brantner, Center for Program Development & Management Joseph Daversa, Director – Bureau of Public Transportation James Grier, Division Chief, Bureau of Public Transportation Robert Janecko, Center for Program Development & Management Ran Marshall, Bureau of Rail Freight Robert Shellenberger, Bureau of Public Transportation William Trethaway, Center for Program Development & Management Anita Everhard, State Transportation Advisory Committee Consultant Team: Keith Chase, Project Director Toby Fauver, AICP, Project Manager Patrick Anater Michelle Hoshauer PAGE 4 Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 STUDY BACKGROUND Pennsylvania, like most states, faces transportation challenges and opportunities related to economic development, dispersed land use, growth impacts, and significant increases in vehicular travel. These trends result in a more congested transportation system and land development practices that sometimes strain the existing transportation system. PENNDOT, its regional planning partners, and federal modal agencies realize that the level of investment required to build our way out of congestion is unachievable. Recognizing this challenge, and the need for a balanced transportation system, PENNDOT issued PennPlan in January 2000 as Pennsylvania’s Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan. PennPlan sets forth a bold new direction over a 25-year time horizon. It responds to PENNDOT’s customers, who stressed the need for greater personal mobility, more transportation options, and an environmentally sustainable transportation system. PennPlan identified the need for this TAC passenger rail study with the objective of completing it by 2002. Several of the PennPlan statewide corridors are currently served by, or have some potential to be served by intercity passenger rail. 1.2 STUDY PURPOSE The Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) chose to broadly assess the need for statewide intercity passenger rail service in key transportation corridors pursuant to PennPlan Objective #20. PennPlan contains ten broad goals that relate to various key themes, public input, and 29 specific objectives. One objective (#20) is to “Develop a statewide, passenger-rail needs assessment.” That objective relates to several of the ten PennPlan goals, including: 1. Retain jobs and expand economic opportunities 2. Make transportation decisions that support land use planning objectives 3. Maintain, upgrade, and improve the transportation system. These goals in turn relate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amtrak's Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads
    Amtrak’s Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads September 21, 2017 Jim Blair –Director Host Railroads Today’s Amtrak System 2| Amtrak Amtrak’s Services • Northeast Corridor (NEC) • 457 miles • Washington‐New York‐Boston Northeast Corridor • 11.9 million riders in FY16 • Long Distance (LD) services • 15 routes • Up to 2,438 miles in length Long • 4.65 million riders in FY16 Distance • State‐supported trains • 29 routes • 19 partner states • Up to 750 miles in length State- • 14.7 million riders in FY16 supported3| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads Amtrak Route System Track Ownership Excluding Terminal Railroads VANCOUVER SEATTLE Spokane ! MONTREAL PORTLAND ST. PAUL / MINNEAPOLIS Operated ! St. Albans by VIA Rail NECR MDOT TORONTO VTR Rutland ! Port Huron Niagara Falls ! Brunswick Grand Rapids ! ! ! Pan Am MILWAUKEE ! Pontiac Hoffmans Metra Albany ! BOSTON ! CHICAGO ! Springfield Conrail Metro- ! CLEVELAND MBTA SALT LAKE CITY North PITTSBURGH ! ! NEW YORK ! INDIANAPOLIS Harrisburg ! KANSAS CITY ! PHILADELPHIA DENVER ! ! BALTIMORE SACRAMENTO Charlottesville WASHINGTON ST. LOUIS ! Richmond OAKLAND ! Petersburg ! Buckingham ! Newport News Norfolk NMRX Branch ! Oklahoma City ! Bakersfield ! MEMPHIS SCRRA ALBUQUERQUE ! ! LOS ANGELES ATLANTA SCRRA / BNSF / SDN DALLAS ! FT. WORTH SAN DIEGO HOUSTON ! JACKSONVILLE ! NEW ORLEANS SAN ANTONIO Railroads TAMPA! Amtrak (incl. Leased) Norfolk Southern FDOT ! MIAMI Union Pacific Canadian Pacific BNSF Canadian National CSXT Other Railroads 4| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads ! MONTREAL Amtrak NEC Route System
    [Show full text]
  • Harrisburg Line Capacity Improvements Upgrade of Track 2 from Glen Interlocking to Thorn Interlocking
    HARRISBURG LINE CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS UPGRADE OF TRACK 2 FROM GLEN INTERLOCKING TO THORN INTERLOCKING FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL-STATE PARTNERSHIP FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION Lead Applicant: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Joint Applicant: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTED: $8,337,500 (50%) PROPOSED NON-FEDERAL MATCH: $8,337,500 (50%) TOTAL PROJECT COST: $16,675,000 PROJECT LOCATION: Caln Township, Downingtown Borough, East Caln Township, West Whiteland Township, & East Whiteland Township in Chester County, Pennsylvania - 6th Congressional District No Federal Grant Application Previously Submitted for this Project Table of Contents I. Project Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Project Funding ..................................................................................................................................... 2 III. Applicant Eligibility ............................................................................................................................... 3 IV. NEC Project Eligibility ........................................................................................................................... 3 V. Detailed Project Description ................................................................................................................ 5 VI. Project Location .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Some Clips May Be Behind a Paywall. If You Need Access to These Clips, Email Me at [email protected]
    Some clips may be behind a paywall. If you need access to these clips, email me at [email protected]. Top DEP Stories NorthcentralPA.com: Wolf Administration addresses stream and flooding needs at Open House https://www.northcentralpa.com/news/wolf-administration-addresses-stream-and-flooding-needs-at- open-house/article 4271a188-a81b-11e9-8e97-db6bc03faff9.html Mentions Erie Times: Evidence offers a rare inside look at Erie Coke https://www.goerie.com/news/20190721/evidence-offers-rare-inside-look-at-erie-coke The Derrick: Floodwaters wreak havoc https://www.thederrick.com/news/front page/floodwaters-wreak-havoc/article 5ddaa618-ab4f-11e9- a4dc-2bab075730f9.html Titusville Herald: Area roads, homes ravaged by flooding http://www.titusvilleherald.com/news/article ef9eedb0-ac3b-11e9-9562-2f720710adb1.html Bloomsburg Press-Enterprise: Ricketts Glen water not safe to drink https://www.pressenterpriseonline.com/daily/072019/page/3/story/ricketts-glen-water-not-safe-to- drink Lock Haven Express: Mosquito spraying Wednesday http://www.lockhaven.com/news/local-news/2019/07/mosquito-spraying-wednesday/ KDKA: Chemicals Removed From Building That Contributed To Beaver Co. Fires While Cleanup On Second Expected To Take Weeks https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2019/07/20/dep-beaver-county-fires-cleanup/ Beaver County Times: Chemicals removed from site of Rochester fire https://www.timesonline.com/news/20190721/chemicals-removed-from-site-of-rochester-fire Beaver Countian: State Continues Remediation Work At Site Of Rochester Chemical Fire https://beavercountian.com/content/community-events/state-continues-remediation-work-at-site-of- rochester-chemical-fire Restore Pennsylvania Meadville Tribune: Should improved internet for rural residents be paid for by a severance tax, borrowing? https://www.meadvilletribune.com/news/should-improved-internet-for-rural-residents-be-paid-for- by/article 42a6be6c-aa92-11e9-81f0-1f758aef6d2c.html Air Express Times: This cement plant burns coal and hazardous waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Topographical View of 1889 Floodpath Johnstown Area Heritage Association
    Topographical view of 1889 Floodpath Johnstown Area Heritage Association rom an atlas of Cambria County published by Caldwell in 1890. Church. Pink marks the backwash off Westmont Hill up the Stoneycreek FThe atlas was about to go to press when the Flood occurred. All the to Kernville. copies were hand-painted in watercolor to show the path of the Flood. The dam and lake are to the right of center at the top of the map. J.A. Caldwell, Illustrated Historical Atlas of Cambria County, Pennsylvania. Johnstown is in the foreground. Blue areas are the main flood wave. Philadelphia, PA: Atlas Publishing Company, 1890 Orange marks where the flood wave divided at Franklin St. Methodist ©2005 Johnstown Area Heritage Association Johnstown Flood Museum: Recipe for Disaster Map of Johnstown, 1889 before the Flood Johnstown Area Heritage Association rom an atlas of Cambria County published by Caldwell in 1889. The Flood came down the Little Conemaugh River, which enters the map FThe atlas was about to go to press when the Flood occurred. All from above. The Stone Bridge is just off the left edge of the map. This map the copies were hand-painted in watercolor to show the areas that were makes it easy to see how the Stone Bridge’s dam of debris created a filthy destroyed in the Flood. The area of downtown Johnstown that was ruined lake covering most of Johnstown. is shown in blue. Most of the buildings shown as black rectangles were crushed by floodwaters. J.A. Caldwell, Illustrated Historical Atlas of Cambria County, Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue of Play on October 4 & 5 at the "The 6 :,53"
    I the 'It, 980 6:53 OCTOBER !li AMTRAK... ... now serving BRYAN and LOVELAND ... returns to INDIA,NAPOLIS then turns em away Amtrak's LAKE SHORE LIMITED With appropriate "first trip" is now making regular stops inaugural festivities, Amtrak every day at BRYAN in north­ introduced daily operation of western Ohio. The westbound its new HOOSIER STATE on the train stops at 11:34am and 1st of October between IND­ the eastbound train stops at IANAPOLIS and CHICAGO. Sev­ 8:15pm. eral OARP members were on the Amtrak's SHENANDOAH inaugural trip, including Ray is now stopping daily at a Kline, Dave Marshall and Nick new station stop in suburban Noe. Complimentary champagne Cincinnati. The eastbound was served to all passengers SHENANDOAH stops at LOVELAND and Amtrak public affairs at 7:09pm and the westbound representatives passed out train stops at 8:15am. A m- Amtrak literature. One of trak began both new stops on the Amtrak reps was also pas­ Sunday, October 26th. Sev­ sing out OARP brochures! [We eral OARP members were on don't miss an opportunity!] hand at both stations as the Our members reported that the "first trains" rolled in. inaugural round trip was a OARP has supported both new good one, with on-time oper­ station stops and we are ation the whole way. Tracks glad they have finally come permit 70mph speeds much of about. Both communities are the way and the only rough supportive of their new Am­ track was noted near Chicago. trak service. How To Find Amtrak held another in its The Station Maps for both series of FAMILY DAYS with BRYAN qnd LOVELAND will be much equipment on public dis­ fopnd' inside this issue of play on October 4 & 5 at the "the 6 :,53".
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Agenda
    CITY COUNCIL AGENDA COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE ONLINE Due to the COVID-19 precautions, the Council Meetings will be held online and is planned to be cablecast on Verizon 21, Comcast 71 and 996 and streamed to www.greenbeltmd.gov/municipaltv. Resident participation: Join By Phone: (301) 715-8592 Webinar ID: 842 3915 3080 Passcode: 736144 In advance, the hearing impaired is advised to use MD RELAY at 711 to submit your questions/comments or contact the City Clerk at (301) 474-8000 or email [email protected]. Monday, October 12, 2020 8:00 PM I. ORGANIZATION 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Meditation and Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag 4. Consent Agenda - Approval of Staff Recommendations (Items on the Consent Agenda [marked by *] will be approved as recommended by staff, subject to removal from the Consent Agenda by Council.) 5. Approval of Agenda and Additions II. COMMUNICATIONS 1 6. Presentations 6a. Co-op Month Proclamation Suggested Action: Every October is a chance to celebrate cooperatives, uniquely-local organizations. The theme for this year’s National Co-Op Month is “Co-Ops: By the Community, For the Community”. Members from more than 40,000 cooperatives nationwide will celebrate the advantages of cooperative membership and recognize the benefits and values cooperatives bring to their members and communities. Representatives from Greenbelt’s seven cooperatives have been invited to attend tonight’s meeting to receive a proclamation announcing the City’s support and recognition of cooperative businesses and organizations during this month. version 2 CoopMonth 19 proc.pdf 6b. Maryland Economic Development Week Suggested Action: October 19th – 23rd is Maryland’s Economic Development Week.
    [Show full text]
  • Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives
    REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITOL LIMITED Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    CAPITOL LIMITED train time schedule & line map Capitol Limited View In Website Mode The train line Capitol Limited has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chicago Union Station: 4:05 PM (2) Washington Union Station: 7:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest CAPITOL LIMITED train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next CAPITOL LIMITED train arriving. Direction: Chicago Union Station CAPITOL LIMITED train Time Schedule 16 stops Chicago Union Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 4:05 PM Monday 4:05 PM Union Station 50 Massachusetts Avenue Ne, Washington Tuesday 4:05 PM Rockville Amtrak Wednesday 4:05 PM 250 Rockville Pike, Rockville Thursday 4:05 PM Harpers Ferry Amtrak Friday 4:05 PM 182 Potomac St, Harpers Ferry Saturday 4:05 PM Martinsburg Amtrak Station 229 East Martin Street, Berkeley County Cumberland Amtrak Station 200 Park St, Cumberland CAPITOL LIMITED train Info Direction: Chicago Union Station Connellsville Amtrak Stops: 16 Trip Duration: 1060 min Pittsburgh Amtrak Station Line Summary: Union Station, Rockville Amtrak, 1100 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh Harpers Ferry Amtrak, Martinsburg Amtrak Station, Cumberland Amtrak Station, Connellsville Amtrak, Alliance Amtrak Pittsburgh Amtrak Station, Alliance Amtrak, Cleveland, Elyria Amtrak, Sandusky Amtrak Station, Cleveland Toledo, Waterloo Amtrak Station, Elkhart Amtrak 200 Cleveland Memorial Shoreway, Cleveland Station, South Bend Amtrak Station, Chicago Union Station Elyria Amtrak 410 East River Road, Elyria Sandusky Amtrak Station
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2018 – 2022 Corporate Plan and 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets
    p SUMMARY OF THE 2018 – 2022 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS SUMMARY OF THE 2018-2022 CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 MANDATE ...................................................................................................................................... 14 CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ................................................... 14 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ............................................................................................ 14 2.2 Governance and Accountability .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting ........................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Audit Regime .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.4 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................. 17 2.2.5 Canada Transportation Act Review ................................................................................. 18 2.3 Overview of VIA Rail’s Business .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Metrobus Routes
    Bus Service from Pentagon - Dupont Shaw Sunset Hills Rd POTOMAC RIVER Circle Howard U Wiehle Ave BUS SERVICE AND BOARDING LOCATIONS 599 267 WASHINGTON 599 The table shows approximate minutes between buses; check schedules for full details Farragut Mt Vernon BUS BOARDING MAP Wiehle- Foggy Bottom- Farragut North McPherson Union Reston East GWU West Square Square Station BOARD AT MONDAY TO FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Spring Hill ROUTE DESTINATION BUS BAY AM RUSH MIDDAY PM RUSH EVENING DAY EVENING DAY EVENING 110 Metro Gallery Judiciary Greensboro LINCOLNIA-NORTH FAIRLINGTON LINE The Pentagon 7Y H St 16E Center Place Square RESTON 66 7A Lincolnia via Quantrell Ave U5 40-60 40 -- 15-55 60 30-60 45 45 J J e e 698 f f f f e Tysons Corner 599 7F Lincolnia via N Hampton Dr, Chambliss St U5 60 40 -- 60 60 -- -- -- e r r s 18th St s Washington Blvd 698 16C o o n 14th St 12th St E St n Rosslyn 7Y Farragut Square U9 8-24 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 42 m D U13 D Penn. Ave a 66 a McLean 22A Ballston-MU Virginia Square-GMU Clarendon Court House v Wilson v i 7A 7Y Southern Towers U5 -- -- 10-20 -- -- -- -- -- i s Blvd U12 s 22C H H Federal Archives w 7th St w U11 y Triangle PARK CENTER-PENTAGON LINE y Highland St 599 U10 L11 East Falls Church Wilson Blvd 698 Constitution Ave 7C Park Center via Walter Reed U5 -- -- 20-35 -- -- -- -- -- U8 St Randolph 42 Washington Blvd t 16E 16C L10 S Glebe Theodore Roosevelt U7 U9 7P Park Center U5 20-30 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- s Rd Memorial Bridge d The Mall L9 a Federal U6 E Center SW LINCOLNIA-PENTAGON LINE L8 S Smithsonian Independence
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]