DOCSLIB.ORG

DETECTION of ORTHOPOXVIRUS ANTIBODIES in SERA of SOME DOMESTIC SPECIES in the SUDAN by Siham Tag Elsir Karam Alla Alkidir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DETECTION of ORTHOPOXVIRUS ANTIBODIES in SERA of SOME DOMESTIC SPECIES in the SUDAN by Siham Tag Elsir Karam Alla Alkidir View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KhartoumSpace DETECTION OF ORTHOPOXVIRUS ANTIBODIES IN SERA OF SOME DOMESTIC SPECIES IN THE SUDAN BY Siham Tag Elsir Karam Alla Alkidir (B.V.M.2002, University of Khartoum) Athesis submitted to the University of Khartoum in fulfillment of requirement for the degree of Master of Veterinary Medicine by Research Department of Microbiology Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Khartoum (June 2008) DEDICATION To my mother, father Husband, daughters, Sisters, brothers And friends With deepest love Acknowledgments Praise to Allah who gave me the ability and health to accomplish, this research work. My sincere thanks and gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Abdelmalik Ibrahim Khalafalla for his guidance, support and encouragement throughout this work. I am also indebted to Dr.Tag Elsir Mohamed, Central Veterinary Research Laboratory in Soba for his help and provision of some essential materials. My deep thanks to my colleague Dr. Afraa Tagelsir for her help and support. I am extremely grateful to the staff of the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Khartoum, for providing facilities to conduct this work, special thanks to Mr.Sharani Omer for his technical assistance during the laboratory work, And to Miss. Mawahib Awad for her assistance during this study. My gratitude is also extended to all staff of the Department of Preventive Medicine, namely Dr. Kitma Hassan Elmalek, Dr. Abdelwahid Saeed for their support, and Mr. Hussein Abdelraheem and Miss. Zainab Altayeb for their assistance. Also I want to thank Prof. Ahmed Gameel, Department of pathology, for his Help in histopathology. TABLE OF CONTENT DEDECATION.................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENT..................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENT ..................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGUERS.......................................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................. ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................. x ARABIC ABESTRACT .................................................................... xi ENGLISH ABESTRACT ................................................................. xii INTRODUCTION............................................................................... 1 CHAPTERI: LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................. 3 1.1 Diseases caused by viruses of the genus orthopoxvirus ................ 3 1.2 Camel pox ..................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Etiology of CP............................................................................ 3 1.2.2 Importance of the disease........................................................... 4 1.2.3 Epidemiology of CP ................................................................... 4 1.2.4 Clinical symptoms...................................................................... 6 1.2.5 Diagnosis of CP.......................................................................... 7 1.3 Cowpox ......................................................................................... 8 1.3.1 Cause of cow pox ....................................................................... 8 1.3.2 Occurrence ................................................................................. 8 1.3.3 Transmission .............................................................................. 8 1.3.4 Clinical & Pathologic Features................................................... 9 1.3.5 Diagnosis.................................................................................... 9 1.3.6 Prevention ................................................................................ 10 1.3.7 Public health significance......................................................... 10 1.4 Poxviridae ................................................................................... 10 1.5 Taxonomic structure of the family .............................................. 10 1.6 Orthopoxvirus ............................................................................ 11 1.7 Classification............................................................................... 12 1.8 Morphology................................................................................. 13 1.9 Physiochemical and physical properties...................................... 14 1.9. 1 Nucleic acid............................................................................. 14 1.9.2 Lipids ....................................................................................... 14 1.10 Diagnosis of Orthopoxvirus ...................................................... 14 1.11 Vaccinia virus............................................................................ 16 1.12 Basic biology............................................................................. 16 1.13 Host resistance........................................................................... 17 1.14 Origin ........................................................................................ 18 1.15 Use as a vaccine ........................................................................ 18 1.16 History....................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER II: MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................. 20 2.1 Virus strain.................................................................................. 20 2.2 Hyper immune serum .................................................................. 20 2.3 Serum samples ............................................................................ 20 2.4 Preparation and sterilization of glassware ................................... 20 2.5 Preparation of solution and cell culture media ............................ 21 2.5.1 Phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and phosphate diluent (PD) ..... 21 2.5.2 Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium (GMEM) ..................... 21 2.5.3 Tryptose phosphate broth (TPB) .............................................. 21 2.5.4 Lactalbumin hydrolysate .......................................................... 21 2.5.5 1%Yeast extract solution.......................................................... 21 2.5.6 7.5%Sodium bicarbonate solution............................................ 21 2.5.7 Thioglycolate medium.............................................................. 22 2.5.8 Trypsin-Versene solution ......................................................... 22 2.5.9 Penicillin-Streptomycin solution .............................................. 22 2.5.10 Fungizon solution................................................................... 22 2.6 Embryonated Chicken Eggs ........................................................ 22 2.6.1 Chorioallantoic Membrane Inoculation.................................... 23 2.6.2 Harvest of Chorioallantoic Membrane ..................................... 23 2.7 Pock lesion histopathology.......................................................... 24 2.8 Preparation of Cell Culture.......................................................... 24 2.9 Virus propagation........................................................................ 25 2.10 Virus titration ............................................................................ 25 2.11 Agar Gel preparation................................................................. 25 2.12 Agar gel immunodiffusion test.................................................. 25 2.12.1 Preparation of agar gel ........................................................... 25 2.12.2 Standardization of AGID test ................................................. 25 2.12.3 Examination of the sera for antibodies against Orthopox viruses using AGID test……………… …. ………………………………...26 CHAPTER III: RESULT .................................................................. 27 3.1Growth of Vaccinia virus on the chorioallantoic membrane ........ 27 3.2 Histopathology of the CAM0 ...................................................... 27 3.3 Growth of vaccinia virus in Cell Culture..................................... 27 3.4 Sero-prevalence of orthopox virus in Sheep, cattle and camel serum samples ............................................................................. 27 CHAPTER IV: DISCUSSION.......................................................... 35 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................... 40 REFERENCES.................................................................................. 41 APPENDICES................................................................................... 52 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Pock lesions produced by Vaccinia virus on CAM of embryonated eggs.................................................................................31 Figure 2 CAM section showing swollen of the cells with pale cytoplasm and some inclusions bodies……………………………………………32 Figure 3 CAM section showing foci of epithelial thickening…….…...33 Figure 4 Vero cell culture infected with Vaccinia Virus showing rounding and plaque formation ………………………………………34 Figure 5 Precipitation line in AGID test for detection of antibodies against orthopox viruses……….………………………………..…….35 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Testing sera collected from cattle, sheep and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grapevine Virus Diseases: Economic Impact and Current Advances in Viral Prospection and Management1
    1/22 ISSN 0100-2945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017411 GRAPEVINE VIRUS DISEASES: ECONOMIC IMPACT AND CURRENT ADVANCES IN VIRAL PROSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT1 MARCOS FERNANDO BASSO2, THOR VINÍCIUS MArtins FAJARDO3, PASQUALE SALDARELLI4 ABSTRACT-Grapevine (Vitis spp.) is a major vegetative propagated fruit crop with high socioeconomic importance worldwide. It is susceptible to several graft-transmitted agents that cause several diseases and substantial crop losses, reducing fruit quality and plant vigor, and shorten the longevity of vines. The vegetative propagation and frequent exchanges of propagative material among countries contribute to spread these pathogens, favoring the emergence of complex diseases. Its perennial life cycle further accelerates the mixing and introduction of several viral agents into a single plant. Currently, approximately 65 viruses belonging to different families have been reported infecting grapevines, but not all cause economically relevant diseases. The grapevine leafroll, rugose wood complex, leaf degeneration and fleck diseases are the four main disorders having worldwide economic importance. In addition, new viral species and strains have been identified and associated with economically important constraints to grape production. In Brazilian vineyards, eighteen viruses, three viroids and two virus-like diseases had already their occurrence reported and were molecularly characterized. Here, we review the current knowledge of these viruses, report advances in their diagnosis and prospection of new species, and give indications about the management of the associated grapevine diseases. Index terms: Vegetative propagation, plant viruses, crop losses, berry quality, next-generation sequencing. VIROSES EM VIDEIRAS: IMPACTO ECONÔMICO E RECENTES AVANÇOS NA PROSPECÇÃO DE VÍRUS E MANEJO DAS DOENÇAS DE ORIGEM VIRAL RESUMO-A videira (Vitis spp.) é propagada vegetativamente e considerada uma das principais culturas frutíferas por sua importância socioeconômica mundial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Munich Outbreak of Cutaneous Cowpox Infection: Transmission by Infected Pet Rats
    Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 126–131 INVESTIGATIVE REPORT The Munich Outbreak of Cutaneous Cowpox Infection: Transmission by Infected Pet Rats Sandra VOGEL1, Miklós SÁRDY1, Katharina GLOS2, Hans Christian KOrting1, Thomas RUZICKA1 and Andreas WOLLENBERG1 1Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, and 2Department of Dermatology, Haas and Link Animal Clinic, Germering, Germany Cowpox virus infection of humans is an uncommon, another type of orthopoxvirus, from infected pet prairie potentially fatal, skin disease. It is largely confined to dogs have recently been described in the USA, making Europe, but is not found in Eire, or in the USA, Austral­ the medical community aware of the risk of transmission asia, or the Middle or Far East. Patients having contact of pox viruses from pets (3). with infected cows, cats, or small rodents sporadically Seven of 8 exposed patients living in the Munich contract the disease from these animals. We report here area contracted cowpox virus infection from an unusual clinical aspects of 8 patients from the Munich area who source: rats infected with cowpox virus bought from had purchased infected pet rats from a local supplier. Pet local pet shops and reputedly from the same supplier rats are a novel potential source of local outbreaks. The caused a clinically distinctive pattern of infection, which morphologically distinctive skin lesions are mostly res­ was mostly restricted to the patients’ neck and trunk. tricted to the patients’ necks, reflecting the infected ani­ We report here dermatologically relevant aspects of mals’ contact pattern. Individual lesions vaguely resem­ our patients in order to alert the medical community to ble orf or Milker’s nodule, but show marked surrounding the possible risk of a zoonotic orthopoxvirus outbreak erythema, firm induration and local adenopathy.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Common Viral Diseases of Animals in Louisiana
    Sampling and Testing Guide for Common Viral Diseases of Animals in Louisiana Please click on the species of interest: Cattle Deer and Small Ruminants The Louisiana Animal Swine Disease Diagnostic Horses Laboratory Dogs A service unit of the LSU School of Veterinary Medicine Adapted from Murphy, F.A., et al, Veterinary Virology, 3rd ed. Cats Academic Press, 1999. Compiled by Rob Poston Multi-species: Rabiesvirus DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 1 Cattle Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 2 Deer and Small Ruminants Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral disease Respiratory viral disease Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 3 Swine Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 4 Horses Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Neurological viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Abortifacient/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 5 Dogs Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v.
    [Show full text]
  • Pt Education-Rubella
    Patient Education Healthcare Epidemiology and Infection Control Rubella An illness requiring droplet precautions This handout describes What is Rubella? Rubella and it symptoms. It Rubella (also called German measles, 3-day measles or Rubella virus also explains how this infection) is a viral disease. It can be prevented with a vaccine. disease can be spread and You are not at risk if you have: offers steps to prevent • Had blood tests showing that you are immune due to a history of others from getting it. clinical disease. To learn more about Rubella, • Received 2 doses of the MMR (Mumps, Measles, Rubella) vaccine. visit these Web sites: Rubella is a reportable disease. The health department is notified when a case is diagnosed to protect others who may have come in contact with www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/ you and are at risk of becoming ill. revb/measles/rubella_index The greatest danger from rubella is to unborn babies. If a woman gets .htm rubella in the early months of her pregnancy, there is an 80% chance that www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd her baby will be born with birth defects. Babies may be born deaf or blind. They may have damaged hearts or small brains. Many are mentally -vac/rubella/default.htm retarded. Miscarriages are also common among women who get rubella while they are pregnant. What are the symptoms? The symptoms of Rubella include a slight fever that lasts for about 24 hours, and a rash on the face and neck that lasts 2 or 3 days. The rash is pink or light red spots that may merge to form splotches.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Do We Stand After Decades of Studying Human Cytomegalovirus?
    microorganisms Review Where do we Stand after Decades of Studying Human Cytomegalovirus? 1, 2, 1 1 Francesca Gugliesi y, Alessandra Coscia y, Gloria Griffante , Ganna Galitska , Selina Pasquero 1, Camilla Albano 1 and Matteo Biolatti 1,* 1 Laboratory of Pathogenesis of Viral Infections, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; [email protected] (F.G.); gloria.griff[email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (C.A.) 2 Complex Structure Neonatology Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 19 March 2020; Accepted: 5 May 2020; Published: 8 May 2020 Abstract: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a linear double-stranded DNA betaherpesvirus belonging to the family of Herpesviridae, is characterized by widespread seroprevalence, ranging between 56% and 94%, strictly dependent on the socioeconomic background of the country being considered. Typically, HCMV causes asymptomatic infection in the immunocompetent population, while in immunocompromised individuals or when transmitted vertically from the mother to the fetus it leads to systemic disease with severe complications and high mortality rate. Following primary infection, HCMV establishes a state of latency primarily in myeloid cells, from which it can be reactivated by various inflammatory stimuli. Several studies have shown that HCMV, despite being a DNA virus, is highly prone to genetic variability that strongly influences its replication and dissemination rates as well as cellular tropism. In this scenario, the few currently available drugs for the treatment of HCMV infections are characterized by high toxicity, poor oral bioavailability, and emerging resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Host Micrornas That Respond to DNA Virus Infection in a Crustacean Tianzhi Huang, Dandan Xu and Xiaobo Zhang*
    Huang et al. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:159 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/159 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Characterization of host microRNAs that respond to DNA virus infection in a crustacean Tianzhi Huang, Dandan Xu and Xiaobo Zhang* Abstract Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are key posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression that are implicated in many processes of eukaryotic cells. It is known that the expression profiles of host miRNAs can be reshaped by viruses. However, a systematic investigation of marine invertebrate miRNAs that respond to virus infection has not yet been performed. Results: In this study, the shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus was challenged by white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). Small RNA sequencing of WSSV-infected shrimp at different time post-infection (0, 6, 24 and 48 h) identified 63 host miRNAs, 48 of which were conserved in other animals, representing 43 distinct families. Of the identified host miRNAs, 31 were differentially expressed in response to virus infection, of which 25 were up-regulated and six down-regulated. The results were confirmed by northern blots. The TargetScan and miRanda algorithms showed that most target genes of the differentially expressed miRNAs were related to immune responses. Gene ontology analysis revealed that immune signaling pathways were mediated by these miRNAs. Evolutionary analysis showed that three of them, miR-1, miR-7 and miR-34, are highly conserved in shrimp, fruit fly and humans and function in the similar pathways. Conclusions: Our study provides the first large-scale characterization of marine invertebrate miRNAs that respond to virus infection. This will help to reveal the molecular events involved in virus-host interactions mediated by miRNAs and their evolution in animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Type, Collection Methods, and Diagnostic Assays Available For
    Specimen type, collection methods, and diagnostic assays available for the detection of poxviruses from human specimens by the Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1. Specimen Orthopoxvirus Parapoxvirus Yatapoxvirus Molluscipoxvirus Specimen type collection method PCR6 Culture EM8 IHC9,10 Serology11 PCR12 EM8 IHC9,10 PCR13 EM8 PCR EM8 Lesion material Fresh or frozen Swab 5 Lesion material [dry or in media ] [vesicle / pustule Formalin fixed skin, scab / crust, etc.] Paraffin block Fixed slide(s) Container Lesion fluid Swab [vesicle / pustule [dry or in media5] fluid, etc.] Touch prep slide Blood EDTA2 EDTA tube 7 Spun or aliquoted Serum before shipment Spun or aliquoted Plasma before shipment CSF3,4 Sterile 1. The detection of poxviruses by electron microscopy (EM) and immunohistochemical staining (IHC) is performed by the Infectious Disease Pathology Branch of the CDC. 2. EDTA — Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. 3. CSF — Cerebrospinal fluid. 4. In order to accurately interpret test results generated from CSF specimens, paired serum must also be submitted. 5. If media is used to store and transport specimens a minimal amount should be used to ensure as little dilution of DNA as possible. 6. Orthopoxvirus generic real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays will amplify DNA from numerous species of virus within the Orthopoxvirus genus. Species-specific real-time PCR assays are available for selective detection of DNA from variola virus, vaccinia virus, monkeypox virus, and cowpox virus. 7. Blood is not ideal for the detection of orthopoxviruses by PCR as the period of viremia has often passed before sampling occurs. 8. EM can reveal the presence of a poxvirus in clinical specimens or from virus culture, but this technique cannot differentiate between virus species within the same genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Diversity in Tree Species
    Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Departamento de Fitopatologia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Microbiana Doctoral Thesis Viral diversity in tree species FLÁVIA MILENE BARROS NERY Brasília - DF, 2020 FLÁVIA MILENE BARROS NERY Viral diversity in tree species Thesis presented to the University of Brasília as a partial requirement for obtaining the title of Doctor in Microbiology by the Post - Graduate Program in Microbiology. Advisor Dra. Rita de Cássia Pereira Carvalho Co-advisor Dr. Fernando Lucas Melo BRASÍLIA, DF - BRAZIL FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA NERY, F.M.B Viral diversity in tree species Flávia Milene Barros Nery Brasília, 2025 Pages number: 126 Doctoral Thesis - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Microbiana, Universidade de Brasília, DF. I - Virus, tree species, metagenomics, High-throughput sequencing II - Universidade de Brasília, PPBM/ IB III - Viral diversity in tree species A minha mãe Ruth Ao meu noivo Neil Dedico Agradecimentos A Deus, gratidão por tudo e por ter me dado uma família e amigos que me amam e me apoiam em todas as minhas escolhas. Minha mãe Ruth e meu noivo Neil por todo o apoio e cuidado durante os momentos mais difíceis que enfrentei durante minha jornada. Aos meus irmãos André, Diego e meu sobrinho Bruno Kawai, gratidão. Aos meus amigos de longa data Rafaelle, Evanessa, Chênia, Tati, Leo, Suzi, Camilets, Ricardito, Jorgito e Diego, saudade da nossa amizade e dos bons tempos. Amo vocês com todo o meu coração! Minha orientadora e grande amiga Profa Rita de Cássia Pereira Carvalho, a quem escolhi e fui escolhida para amar e fazer parte da família.
    [Show full text]
  • Virus Classification Tables V2.Vd.Xlsx
    DNA Virus Classification Table DNA Virus Family Genera (Subfamily) Typical Species Genetic material Capsid Envelope Disease in Humans Diseases in other Species Adenoviridae Mastadenovirus Adenoviruses 1‐47 dsDNA Icosahedral Naked Respiratory illness; conjunctivitis, Canine hepatitis, respiratory illness in horses, gastroenteritis, tonsillitis, meningitis, cystitis cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, sea lions, birds dogs, squirrel enteritis Anelloviridae Torqueviruses Alpha‐Zeta Torqueviruses (‐)ssDNA Icosahedral Naked Hepatitis, lupus, pulmonary, myopathy, Chimpanzee, pig, cow, sheep, tree shrews, multiple sclerosis; 90% of humans infected pigs, cats, sea lions and chickens worldwide Asfarviridae Asfivirus African Swine fever virus dsDNA Icosahedral Enveloped African swine fever Arthropod (tick) transmission or ingestion; hemorrhagic fever in warthogs, pigs Baculoviridae Baculovirus Alpha‐Gamma Baculoviruses dsDNA Stick shaped Occluded or Enveloped none identified Arthropods, Lepidoptera, crustaceans Circoviridae Circovirus Porcine circovirus 1 ssDNA Icosahedral Naked none identified Birds, pigs, dogs; bats; rodents; causes post‐ weaning multisystem wasting syndrome, chicken anemia Circoviridae Cyclovirus Human cyclovirus 1 ssDNA Icosahedral Naked Cyclovirus Vietnam encephalitis Encephalitis; infects multiple species including birds, mammals, insects Hepadnaviridae Orthohepadnavirus Hepatitis B virus partially ssDNA Icosahedral Enveloped Hepatitis B virus; Cirrhosis, Hepatocellular Hepatitis in ducks, squirrels, primates, herons carcinoma Herpesviridae
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Viral Infections Vs. Our Immune System: Revisiting Our View of Viruses As Pathogens
    Chronic Viral Infections vs. Our Immune System: Revisiting our view of viruses as pathogens Tiffany A. Reese Assistant Professor Departments of Immunology and Microbiology Challenge your idea of classic viral infection and disease • Define the microbiome and the virome • Brief background on persistent viruses • Illustrate how viruses change disease susceptibility – mutualistic symbiosis – gene + virus = disease phenotype – virome in immune responses Bacteria-centric view of the microbiome The microbiome defined Definition of microbiome – Merriam-Webster 1 :a community of microorganisms (such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses) that inhabit a particular environment and especially the collection of microorganisms living in or on the human body 2 :the collective genomes of microorganisms inhabiting a particular environment and especially the human body Virome Ø Viral component of the microbiome Ø Includes both commensal and pathogenic viruses Ø Viruses that infect host cells Ø Virus-derived elements in host chromosomes Ø Viruses that infect other organisms in the body e.g. phage/bacteria Viruses are everywhere! • “intracellular parasites with nucleic acids that are capable of directing their own replication and are not cells” – Roossinck, Nature Reviews Microbiology 2011. • Viruses infect all living things. • We are constantly eating and breathing viruses from our environment • Only a small subset of viruses cause disease. • We even carry viral genomes as part of our own genetic material! Diverse viruses all over the body Adenoviridae Picornaviridae
    [Show full text]
  • Monkeypox Virus Emergence in Wild Chimpanzees Reveals Distinct Clinical Outcomes and Viral Diversity
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0706-0 Monkeypox virus emergence in wild chimpanzees reveals distinct clinical outcomes and viral diversity Livia V. Patrono1,6, Kamilla Pléh1,2,6, Liran Samuni2,3, Markus Ulrich1, Caroline Röthemeier1, Andreas Sachse1, Silvia Muschter4, Andreas Nitsche4, Emmanuel Couacy-Hymann5, Christophe Boesch2,3, Roman M. Wittig 2,3, Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer1 and Fabian H. Leendertz 1 ✉ Monkeypox is a viral zoonotic disease on the rise across endemic habitats. Despite the growing importance of monkeypox virus, our knowledge on its host spectrum and sylvatic maintenance is limited. Here, we describe the recent repeated emergence of monkeypox virus in a wild, human-habituated western chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus, hereafter chimpanzee) population from Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. Through daily monitoring, we show that further to causing its typical exanthematous syn- drome, monkeypox can present itself as a severe respiratory disease without a diffuse rash. By analysing 949 non-invasively collected samples, we identify the circulation of at least two distinct monkeypox virus lineages and document the shedding of infectious particles in faeces and flies, suggesting that they could mediate indirect transmission. We also show that the carnivo- rous component of the Taï chimpanzees’ diet, mainly consisting of the sympatric monkeys they regularly hunt, did not change nor shift towards rodent consumption (the presumed reservoir) before the outbreaks, suggesting that the sudden emergence of monkeypox virus in this population is probably due to changes in the ecology of the virus itself. Using long-term mortality surveillance data from Taï National Park, we provide evidence of little to no prior viral activity over at least two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • ICTV Code Assigned: 2011.001Ag Officers)
    This form should be used for all taxonomic proposals. Please complete all those modules that are applicable (and then delete the unwanted sections). For guidance, see the notes written in blue and the separate document “Help with completing a taxonomic proposal” Please try to keep related proposals within a single document; you can copy the modules to create more than one genus within a new family, for example. MODULE 1: TITLE, AUTHORS, etc (to be completed by ICTV Code assigned: 2011.001aG officers) Short title: Change existing virus species names to non-Latinized binomials (e.g. 6 new species in the genus Zetavirus) Modules attached 1 2 3 4 5 (modules 1 and 9 are required) 6 7 8 9 Author(s) with e-mail address(es) of the proposer: Van Regenmortel Marc, [email protected] Burke Donald, [email protected] Calisher Charles, [email protected] Dietzgen Ralf, [email protected] Fauquet Claude, [email protected] Ghabrial Said, [email protected] Jahrling Peter, [email protected] Johnson Karl, [email protected] Holbrook Michael, [email protected] Horzinek Marian, [email protected] Keil Guenther, [email protected] Kuhn Jens, [email protected] Mahy Brian, [email protected] Martelli Giovanni, [email protected] Pringle Craig, [email protected] Rybicki Ed, [email protected] Skern Tim, [email protected] Tesh Robert, [email protected] Wahl-Jensen Victoria, [email protected] Walker Peter, [email protected] Weaver Scott, [email protected] List the ICTV study group(s) that have seen this proposal: A list of study groups and contacts is provided at http://www.ictvonline.org/subcommittees.asp .
    [Show full text]