L/3982January 1974 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

L/3982January 1974 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 28L/3982January 1974 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution Original: English GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES Notification by Australia The following communication, dated 21 December 1973, has been received from the Permanent! Mission of Australia. Pursuant to the Decision of the CONTRACTING PARTIES of 28 March 1966, Australia introduced a. system of tariff preferences for developing countries on a list of manufactures, semi-manufactures and handicrafts annexed to that Decision. The scheme has been progressively expanded with the CONTRACTING PARTIES being fully informed as changes have been proposed. The last notifications of changes were set out in document L/3884 of 28 July 1973 and L/3884/Add.l of 5 October 1973. The last annual report, the Sixth Annual Report. by Australia, was in document L/3798 of 18 January 1973. Arising from a detailed reappraisal of the existing system, the Australian government has decided to implement, from 1 January 1974, a new and substantially broader system of preferences for developing countries. This will replace compleely tho system initiated under the waiver of 28 March 1966. The GATTCouncil was informed on 30 July 1973 of Australia's broad intentions in. this respect (subsequently circulated in document L/3896 of 8 August 1973) and full details were to be provided as soon as these had been determined. Because the new scheme of tariff preferences being introduced by Australia relates the Australian system closely to the approaches adopted in the Generalized Preferences Schemes of other contracting parties, it is the intention of the Australi government to operate its new system of -iariff preferences for developing countries in accordance with 'he provisions of the waiver adopted by the CONTRACTINTG PARTIES under t*e Decision of 25. June 1971, .Lnl these circumstances the waiver to Australia of 28 March 1966 will not have any application after 31 December 1973. The new system being introduced by Australia will be complemented by the establishment, as soon as practicable, of a trade development facility within the Australian Department of Overseas Trade. This facility is designed to provide practical assistance to developing countries by way of market information and p-ocessing. of trade enquiries, so that.opportunities under the system. of preferences can be maximized. In accordance with the notification procedures under paragraph (c) of the Decision of 25 June 1971, set out below for the information of the CONTRACTING PARTIES are full details of the new proposals. In no instance has a General Rate of duty (mf.n.) been raised to establish a preference for developing countries. L/3982 Page 2 AUSTRALIAN TARIFF PREFERENCES DEVELOPINGFOR COUNTRIES Introduction 1. The valuable contribution towards the economic expansion of developing countries which can be made by providing increased opportunities for export sales by developing countries is widely recognised. 2. Australia, in 1966, introduced a non-reciprocal preferential tariff scheme under which specified manufactured and semi-manufactured products could be imported from developing countries free of duty or at reduced rates of duty but generally subject to quota limitations. In addition, specified handicraft products could be imported free of duty and quota limitation. That system, which has been progressively expanded, gave acknowledgement to the difficulties which developing countries face in international trade, and was designed to place developing countries in. a better position to compete in the Australian Taarket. 3. In a conscious effort to expand further the opportunities available ,to developing countries, the Australian Government has decided to make a major revision of its system of tariff preferences for developing countries. The government has also decided to establish a small trade development facility (which will become operative during 1974) to help developing countries with trade Inquiries and market information. 4. The introduction of a greatly expanded system of tariff preferences taken with the general reduction by one-quarter in Australian import duties made by the Government on 13' July 1973, means that duties on a wide range of products included in the revised system have been reduced by one-third to three-quarters of the pre-July 1973 rates with a median reduction of about 50 per cent. In addition about 860 items or approximately one-third of the total items in the Australian Tariff are free of duty when imported from developing countries under the tariff preferences system and a further 325 items, including a number in BTI chapters 1-24, are free of duty from any source. Operative date 5. The revised system operates from 1 January 1974. Eligible countries 6. Countries, territories and provinces which are declared to be eligible for beneficiary status for the purposes of the Australian system of tariff preferences for developing countries are set out in Appendix 1. L/3982 Page 3 Product coverage 7. The system has a wide product c verage extending to most dutiable manufactured, semi-manufactured and substantially processed primary products without quota limitations except for a few products. Products excluded from the system are mainly: products subject to revenue duties such as tobacco products, beer and spirits; products where developing countries are already. competitive or are likely quickly to become competitive in the Australian market at General Tariff rates of duty. All the products covered by the original system of tariff preferences have, been incorporated in the revised system,.mostly without the quota limitations that previously. applied. 8. Details .if products falling within .BTN Chapters 1 to 24 and which are included in the tariff preferences system are listed in Appendix 2. Products falling within BTN Chapters 25 to 99 which are excluded from the tariff preferences system are listed in Appendix 3. Those subject to quota limitation are shown in Appendix 4 with details of the quotas and preferential rates of duty. Quotas are allocated to importers on an annual calendar year basis and can be used for imports at the preferential rates of duty from any eligible developing country. Preferential rates of duty 9.. Generally, the initial preferential rates are 10 per cent ad valorem (10 percentage points or equivalent for products subject to specific rates of' duty) below the relevant General Tariff rates (i.e. if the General 'Taziff rate is 30 per cent ad valciem, the rate for eligib a developing count--.ies is 20 per cent ad valorem). 10. There are some variations to this general approach. Products included in the system are free of duty where the General Tariff rate is 12 1/2 per cent ad valorem or less. The prelierentiaJ. rates of duty on products included in the original system have been maintained wherever possible, at rates of duty more than 10 per cent ad valorem below the relevant General Tariff rates. Details of these variations are set out in Appendix 5. Handicraft products .1. Certain specified goods, as listed in Appendix 6 when imported into Australia from eligible developing countries, and qualifying as traditional handicraft products under the procedures outlined in paragraphs.19 and 20 below are already being admitted free of duty without quantitative limitation and this treatment will continue. L/3982 Page 4 Future action 12. Full-scale reviews of the system will be undertaken every two years with the objective of making further predictions of '1a per cent ad valorem (10 percentage points) in preferential rate's of duties until such time as imports from developing countries become competitive in the Australian market. Additionally, at the time of each review, consideration will be given to more liberal treatment in respect of individual items excluded from the system or subject to quota limitation. Safeguard action and consultations 13. This demanded Australian system, like those of other. developed market economy countries, *is a unilateral nd non-reciprocal provision of preferential tariff advantages to developing countries. In consonance with the relevant decisions of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and the' CONTRACTING PARTIES to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), Australia reserves the right at any time, to modify, withdraws suspend or limit the prefer- ential treatment for any item and with respect to any beneficiary country. Any such action arising from cases of serious injury or threat of serious injury to domestic industry Mill only be taken after full consideration of all the circum- stances. Noreover, Australia will provide adequate opportunity for consultations at the request of any of its trading partners about the operation of its system of tariff preferences. 14. A basic purpose of the tariff preference system is to assist developing countries to compete in the Australian market. If it is concluded that nartict.lar countries have become competitive they may be excluded f-rom or otherwise limited as regards the benefit of the preferential treatment in respect of the specific products concerned. The only country limitation at present in the system applies in respect of Hong Kong for the few products listed in Appendix 7. Documentaton requirements 15. Documentation requirements for imports under the Australian preference system have been kept to a minimum. 16. For eligible products other than handicrafts, the exporter must make a declaration on the normal invoice to the effect that (a) the final process of manufacture was performed in the developing country exporting the goods; and (b) not less than one-half of the factory or works cost of the goods is represented by the value of labour and materials of developing countries and/or Australia (tie country or countries concerned must be named and, may include developing countries other than the exporting country). In addition, the goods must either be shipped direct to Australia or, if trans-shipped, Australia must have been the intended destination when the goods were exported from the developing country of origin.
Recommended publications
  • Institution of Electrical Engineers. Further Details Can Be Obtained
    No. 4276 October 13, 1951 NATURE 641 life-history, ecology, population studies, fishery and Gold Coast), senior assistant conservator of forests, utilization and includes observations on autotomy Gold Coast; J. M. Cave (assistant agricultural and autoplasy; a large female with a carapace­ officer, British Honduras), agricultural superintendent, length of 13·5 cm. is estimated to produce 549,000 St. Vincent, Windward Islands ; C. A. Lea (assistant eggs. No. 8 is a paper that should prove of use to director, Meteorological Services, Federation of zoologists everywhere. It contains a bibliography Malaya), director, Meteorological Services, Federation which is complete from Delius and Linrneus (both of Malaya; N. A. MacHattie (forester, Tanganyika), 1758) up to and including 1949; it comprises 1,216 superintending forester, Tanganyika; R. H. Ball entries and is a valuable compilation. There is also and P. Bradshaw, agricultural officers, Nigeria; a key for the whole of the Collembola carried down D. V. Chambers, R. Frank, W. G. Mathewson and to genera ; and, as the characters given are only J. Russell, agricultural officers, Tanganyika; T. J. those essential for generic identification, the name of Forbes and K. Landskroner, agricultural officers, each genus is followed by that of its author, the date Gold Coast; R. N. Green, agricultural officer, and a number in brackets referring to the citation of Somaliland Protectorate; G. Heys, agricultural t hat publication in the bibliography in which the officer, Nyasaland; A. J. Jones, entomologist, original definition of the genus is to be found. This Tanganyika; R. Knight, plant breeder, West African work is additionally welcome because it provides the Cocoa Research Institute, Gold Coast; C.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German Rivalry, 1883-1915
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 7-1-1995 Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915 Matthew Erin Plowman University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Plowman, Matthew Erin, "Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915" (1995). Student Work. 435. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/435 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOORS LEFT OPEN THEN SLAMMED SHUT: THE GERMAN COLONIZATION OF SOUTHWEST AFRICA AND THE ANGLO-GERMAN RIVALRY, 1883-1915. A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts University of Nebraska at Omaha by Matthew Erin Plowman July 1995 UMI Number: EP73073 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI Blsaartalibn Publish*rig UMI EP73073 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Unhcr > Global Trends 2018
    2018 IN REVIEW Trends at a Glance The global population of forcibly displaced increased by 2.3 million people in 2018. By the end of the year, almost 70.8 million individuals were forcibly displaced worldwide as a result of persecution, conflict, violence, or human rights violations. As a result, the world’s forcibly displaced population remained yet again at a record high. MILLION FORCIBLY as a result of persecution, DISplacED 70.8 WORLDwiDE conflict, violence, or human rights violations at end-2018 25.9 million refugees 20.4 million refugees under UNHCR’s mandate 5.5 million Palestine refugees under UNRWA’s mandate 41.3 million internally displaced people1 3.5 million asylum-seekers 37,000 13.6 MILLION NEW DISPLACEMENTS NEWLY DISPLACED EVERY Day 4 IN 5 An estimated 13.6 million people The number of new displacements Nearly 4 out of every 5 refugees were newly displaced due to conflict was equivalent to an average of lived in countries neighbouring their or persecution in 2018. 37,000 people being forced to flee countries of origin. This included 10.8 million individuals their homes every day in 2018. displaced2 within the borders of their own country and 2.8 million new 1 Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre refugees and new asylum-seekers. of the Norwegian Refugee Council. 2 Ibid. 3 The number of new individual asylum applications for Turkey does not include Syrian 3.5 nationals who receive protection under the MILLION Temporary Protection Regulation and relates 16% to applications submitted to UNCHR until 10 September 2018, when the government ASYLUM-SEEKERS assumed full responsibility for registration and Countries in developed regions refugee status determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceiving the Tanganyika-Zanzibar Union in the Midst of the Cold
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University History Faculty Publications History Department 2014 Conceiving the Tanganyika-Zanzibar Union in the Midst of the Cold War: Internal and International Factors Ethan Sanders Bridgewater State University, [email protected] Virtual Commons Citation Sanders, Ethan (2014). Conceiving the Tanganyika-Zanzibar Union in the Midst of the Cold War: Internal and International Factors. In History Faculty Publications. Paper 42. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/history_fac/42 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. African Review Vol. 41, No. 1, 2014: 35-70 Conceiving the Tanganyika-Zanzibar Union in the Midst of the Cold War: Internal and International Factors Ethan R. Sanders* Abstract To what extent was international pressure placed on Nyerere and Karume to unify their two states in April 1964? The argument made is that even though Americans were initially very pleased with the outcome of the Union—because they thought it would help stem the spread of communism in the region—this was not a Western-initiated plan forced upon East African leaders. Indeed, the evidence shows that Americans were largely in the dark and in fact very frustrated by their lack of influence on the situation. Instead, the Union merely served as a confluence of African and American interests. The internal factors are inspected by highlighting African concerns over outside interference, worries about domestic stability, and a desire by Karume to consolidate his power.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]
  • Thezambiazimbabwesadc Fisheriesprojectonlakekariba: Reportfroma Studytnp
    279 TheZambiaZimbabweSADC FisheriesProjectonLakeKariba: Reportfroma studytnp •TrygveHesthagen OddTerjeSandlund Tor.FredrikNæsje TheZambia-ZimbabweSADC FisheriesProjectonLakeKariba: Reportfrom a studytrip Trygve Hesthagen Odd Terje Sandlund Tor FredrikNæsje NORSKINSTITI= FORNATURFORSKNNG O Norwegian institute for nature research (NINA) 2010 http://www.nina.no Please contact NINA, NO-7485 TRONDHEIM, NORWAY for reproduction of tables, figures and other illustrations in this report. nina oppdragsmelding279 Hesthagen,T., Sandlund, O.T. & Næsje, T.F. 1994. NINAs publikasjoner The Zambia-Zimbabwe SADC fisheries project on Lake Kariba: Report from a study trip. NINA NINA utgirfem ulikefaste publikasjoner: Oppdragsmelding279:1 17. NINA Forskningsrapport Her publiseresresultater av NINAs eget forskning- sarbeid, i den hensiktå spre forskningsresultaterfra institusjonen til et større publikum. Forsknings- rapporter utgis som et alternativ til internasjonal Trondheimapril 1994 publisering, der tidsaspekt, materialets art, målgruppem.m. gjør dette nødvendig. ISSN 0802-4103 ISBN 82-426-0471-1 NINA Utredning Serien omfatter problemoversikter,kartlegging av kunnskapsnivået innen et emne, litteraturstudier, sammenstillingav andres materiale og annet som ikke primært er et resultat av NINAs egen Rettighetshaver0: forskningsaktivitet. NINA Norskinstituttfornaturforskning NINA Oppdragsmelding Publikasjonenkansiteresfritt med kildeangivelse Dette er det minimum av rapporteringsomNINA gir til oppdragsgiver etter fullført forsknings- eller utredningsprosjekt.Opplageter
    [Show full text]
  • Uti Possidetis Juris, and the Borders of Israel
    PALESTINE, UTI POSSIDETIS JURIS, AND THE BORDERS OF ISRAEL Abraham Bell* & Eugene Kontorovich** Israel’s borders and territorial scope are a source of seemingly endless debate. Remarkably, despite the intensity of the debates, little attention has been paid to the relevance of the doctrine of uti possidetis juris to resolving legal aspects of the border dispute. Uti possidetis juris is widely acknowledged as the doctrine of customary international law that is central to determining territorial sovereignty in the era of decolonization. The doctrine provides that emerging states presumptively inherit their pre-independence administrative boundaries. Applied to the case of Israel, uti possidetis juris would dictate that Israel inherit the boundaries of the Mandate of Palestine as they existed in May, 1948. The doctrine would thus support Israeli claims to any or all of the currently hotly disputed areas of Jerusalem (including East Jerusalem), the West Bank, and even potentially the Gaza Strip (though not the Golan Heights). TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 634 I. THE DOCTRINE OF UTI POSSIDETIS JURIS ........................................................... 640 A. Development of the Doctrine ..................................................................... 640 B. Applying the Doctrine ................................................................................ 644 II. UTI POSSIDETIS JURIS AND MANDATORY BORDERS ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Forgotten Fishes
    THE WORLD’S FORGOTTEN FISHES CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. DAZZLING DIVERSITY 10 3. HEALTHY FRESHWATER FISHERIES = 16 HEALTHY RIVERS, LAKES & WETLANDS 4. WILD FRESHWATER FISHERIES ARE PRICELESS 18 5. FISHING FOR FUN… IS BIG BUSINESS 26 6. THE WORLD’S MOST POPULAR PETS 30 7. HUMANITY’S FRESHWATER HERITAGE 34 8. FRESHWATER FISH IN FREEFALL 36 9. 80 SPECIES EXTINCT 40 Lead Author: Kathy Hughes 10. A BRIGHTER FUTURE FOR FRESHWATER FISHES 42 WWF wish to thank collaborators Ian Harrison, Will Darwall, Richard Lee, Dean Muruven, Carmen Revenga, Julie Claussen, Abby Lynch, Adrian Pinder, Robin Abell, Paula Martinelli, Mike Baltzer, Michele Thieme, Sonja Jähnig, Jeff Opperman, Herman Wanningen, Jeremy Monroe and Harmony Patricio for their support in writing this report. Furthermore, we wish to thank experts Richard van der Laan, Tim Lyons, Paul Van Damme, Mark Owen, Hannah Rudd, Joao Campos-Silva, Leandro Castello, Vidyadhar Atkore, Thadoe Wai, Simon Funge-Smith, John Jorgensen, Naren Sreenivisan, Mark Lloyd, Arlin Rickard and Matt Gollock for their support with individual case studies. About this report and its collaborators Promoting thriving populations of freshwater fishes and the ecosystems within which they thrive is a priority for WWF Publishing office: WWF International and the 15 organisations and alliances that Cover photography © Karine Aigner / WWF-US produced this report. Design by Lou Clements © 1986 Panda symbol WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature (Formerly World Wildlife Fund) ® “WWF” is a WWF Registered Trademark. WWF
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Potential of Environmental DNA Methods for Surveying Lake Tanganyika's Highly Diverse Fish Communities Christopher J
    Testing the potential of environmental DNA methods for surveying Lake Tanganyika's highly diverse fish communities Christopher James Doble A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London April 2020 1 Declaration I, Christopher James Doble, confirm the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm this has been indicated in the thesis. Christopher James Doble Date: 27/04/2020 2 Statement of authorship I planned and undertook fieldwork to the Kigoma region of Lake Tanganyika, Tanzania in 2016 and 2017. This included obtaining research permits, collecting environmental DNA samples and undertaking fish community visual survey data used in Chapters three and four. For Chapter two, cichlid reference database sequences were sequenced by Walter Salzburger’s research group at the University of Basel. I extracted required regions from mitochondrial genome alignments during a visit to Walter’s research group. Other reference sequences were obtained by Sanger sequencing. I undertook the DNA extractions and PCR amplifications for all samples, with the clean-up and sequencing undertaken by the UCL Sequencing facility. I undertook the method development, DNA extractions, PCR amplifications and library preparations for each of the next generation sequencing runs in Chapters three and four at the NERC Biomolecular Analysis Facility Sheffield. Following training by Helen Hipperson at the NERC Biomolecular Analysis Facility in Sheffield, I undertook the bioinformatic analysis of sequence data in Chapters three and four. I also carried out all the data analysis within each chapter. Chapters two, three and parts of four have formed a manuscript recently published in Environmental DNA (Doble et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Origin and Intra- Specific Variability
    Contributions to Zoology, 87 (2) 105-132 (2018) Monogenean parasites of sardines in Lake Tanganyika: diversity, origin and intra- specific variability Nikol Kmentová1, 15, Maarten Van Steenberge2,3,4,5, Joost A.M. Raeymaekers5,6,7, Stephan Koblmüller4, Pascal I. Hablützel5,8, Fidel Muterezi Bukinga9, Théophile Mulimbwa N’sibula9, Pascal Masilya Mulungula9, Benoît Nzigidahera†10, Gaspard Ntakimazi11, Milan Gelnar1, Maarten P.M. Vanhove1,5,12,13,14 1 Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic 2 Biology Department, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080, Tervuren, Belgium 3 Operational Directorate Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium 4 Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria 5 Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, University of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium 6 Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway 7 Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, N-8049 Bodø, Norway 8 Flanders Marine Institute, Wandelaarkaai 7, 8400 Oostende, Belgium 9 Centre de Recherche en Hydrobiologie, Département de Biologie, B.P. 73 Uvira, Democratic Republic of Congo 10 Office Burundais pour la Protection de l‘Environnement, Centre de Recherche en Biodiversité, Avenue de l‘Imprimerie Jabe 12, B.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Callahan on Tanganyika Under International
    Peter A. Dumbuya. Tanganyika Under International Mandate, 1919-1946. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1995. xxiii + 282 pp. $42.50, cloth, ISBN 978-0-7618-0063-7. Reviewed by Michael D. Callahan Published on H-Africa (December, 1997) The First World War sparked a far-reaching For the frst time, an international organiza‐ debate in Europe and the United States about the tion, through a Permanent Mandates Commission purpose and future of colonialism. Those who (PMC), had the authority to press a colonial gov‐ considered themselves "anti-imperialists" and hu‐ ernment to comply with specific regulations, pro‐ manitarians, including the American president, tect Africans from "abuses," and "promote to the Woodrow Wilson, insisted that "old-fashioned" utmost the material and moral well-being and so‐ imperialism threatened world peace. Wilson re‐ cial progress" of peoples who were "not yet able jected crass annexation of the conquered German to stand by themselves" in the modern world. African colonies and called for a "free, open- Mandates formed "a sacred trust of civilization" minded and absolutely impartial adjustment of all and the larger world now held the imperial pow‐ colonial claims" based on the principle that "the ers hostage to their own rhetoric. Still, Berlin com‐ interests of populations concerned must have plained that the mandates system allowed Britain equal weight with the equitable claims of the gov‐ to virtually annex Germany's former colonies. ernment whose title is to be determined." Many historians have agreed and have argued At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, many that the mandates differed only in name from oth‐ British leaders hoped to annex most of Germany's er colonial possessions.[1] colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • II° , Lutiset!FWA L ° 4' NOR T HERR MULUNGUSHIFALLS FALLS I RHODESIA ZAMBEZI F 1VER ----) • • .... .—.., 0 CAY ,T, R PORTUGUESE EAST KAFUE R
    waig No. 38 for January, 1957 PISCA TOR A NOTE ON EELS (ANGUILLA SPP.) By WINIFRED E. FROST Freshwater Biological Association, Ferry House, Ambleside, England N 1955 and 1956 Mr. P. I. R. Maclaren, Fisheries Officer for Northern Rhodesia, wrote I to me about some eels, Anguilla spp., which he had collected from the Zambesi river system, and in September 1956 he sent me six specimens from his collection which I received in December. We had intended to discuss his finds when he came to England on leave in 1957, but his untimely and tragic death in October 1956, from an attack by a crocodile, prevented such a discussion. In view of this, the following account of eels collected by the late Mr Maclaren is given so that his findings may be recorded. • • or to ¢ II° , LUTISEt!FWA l ° 4' NOR T HERR MULUNGUSHIFALLS FALLS i RHODESIA ZAMBEZI F 1VER ----) • • ...._.—.., 0 CAY ,t, R PORTUGUESE EAST KAFUE R. • AFRICA COFIGEKAFUE 0 I( • SOUTHERN RHODESIA CHIREPO 5 30 oO I , IS 8 : Q.= Z . V1CTCRIA INDIAN FAL.S. 'V < ' - OCEAN. N. .._ 201 2 30 1'12,000,000 0 KNOWN OCCURRENCE OF EELS. • SITE OF EELS MENTIONED IN I XT. X PROBABLE BARRIERS. TO EELS. 1 I 2000,000 2$ 28' 30' 32 Sketch Map made by P. I. R. Mac aren showing localities where eels are known to occur in the Zambesi River system. i•-= • 314 PISCATOR No. 38 for January, 1957 I do not know the total number of eels that Maclaren collected in the Zambesi river system from 1954 to 1956 but he first mentioned them in a letter of November 1955 in which he enquired about methods of identifying his captures.
    [Show full text]