DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ukrainian Weekly, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INSIDE: l Countering the information war in Ukraine – page 6 l New film “Freedom or Death” screened in N.J. – page 10 l Our community: New Jersey, Rhode Island, D.C – pages 16-17 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXIV No. 8 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2016 $2.00 Foreign ministers discuss Coalition near collapse after failed no-confidence vote eastern Ukraine conflict, by Zenon Zawada KYIV – Ukraine’s coalition government implementation of Minsk II approached the brink of collapse after the RFE/RL Verkhovna Rada failed on February 16 to muster enough votes to dismiss the highly MUNICH – Senior diplomats from unpopular prime minister, Arseniy Ukraine, Russia, Germany and France Yatsenyuk, and his Cabinet of Ministers. met in Munich on February 13 to dis- The Samopomich and Batkivshchyna par- cuss the situation in eastern Ukraine ties announced in the following days that and implementation of the Minsk II they were exiting the coalition government, agreement on steps to end the conflict accusing national deputies of the biggest there. parties of abandoning the principles of the The meeting took place on the side- Euro-Maidan that reached its bloody conclu- lines of the Munich Security sion nearly two years earlier to the date. Conference. The foreign affairs minis- “A union of power has become obvious ters of Ukraine, Germany and Russia between the Petro Poroshenko Bloc, the took part, along with a senior French People’s Front (led by Mr. Yatsenyuk), and diplomat. the fragments of the Party of Regions that German Foreign Affairs Minister are controlled by a series of oligarchs,” said a Frank-Walter Steinmeier noted some February 18 statement by the Samopomich progress in negotiations, including on party leadership. the thorny question of how to conduct “Such actions delegitimize the govern- Vladislav Musienko/UNIAN Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk enjoys a laugh in the Verkhovna Rada ahead of elections in areas of eastern Ukraine ment of Ukraine. They are an encroachment controlled by Russia-backed separat- the failed no-confidence vote on February 16. Critics contend the vote was planned to on the country’s order and they put a final fail by the president and oligarchs. ists. end to the ‘European Ukraine’ parliamentary But he said that all sides were still “a coalition. It’s particularly cynical that such a the parliamentary coalition has 217 votes the coalition, claimed this week that his long way off from resolving the con- union was formed on the eve of the anniver- between the Poroshenko Bloc and People’s Radical Party left the coalition on September flict.” sary of the shooting of patriots on the Front parties – nine votes short of a needed 1, 2015, though no official document was He also delivered a rebuke to Russia, Maidan and the tragic events at Debaltseve,” majority. reported at the time. the statement noted. Oleh Liashko, the head of the Radical (Continued on page 14) Without Self-Reliance and Batkivshchyna, Party that was the fifth faction that formed (Continued on page 18) REACTION TO THE MEETING OF POPE AND RUSSIAN PATRIARCH “Two parallel worlds”: An interview with Patriarch Sviatoslav On February 12, Pope Francis and joint texts, it is difficult to expect something two parallel lines do not intersect. It was officially reported that this docu- Patriarch Kirill, the leaders of two Churches, good. Firstly, I would like to say something I found myself experiencing authentic ment was the joint effort of Metropolitan met at the Jose Marti International Airport about the meeting of the holy father with admiration, respect, and a certain reveren- Hilarion (Alfeyev) from the Orthodox side in Havana. The meeting took place in a Patriarch Kirill, and then I will comment on tial awe for the humility of Pope Francis, a and Cardinal [Kurt] Koch with the Pontifical closed setting. It lasted more than two hours. the text of the declaration. true “suffering servant of God,” who seeks Council for Promoting Christian Unity from The meeting of Pope Francis and One notices immediately, especially from one thing: to bear witness to the Gospel of the Catholic side. For a document that was Patriarch Kirill of the Russian Orthodox their comments after the meeting, that the Christ before humankind today, to be in the intended to be not theological, but essen- Church concluded with the signing of a Joint two sides existed on two completely differ- world, but remain of Christ, to have cour- tially socio-political, it is hard to imagine a Declaration, which elicited mixed reactions ent planes and were pursuing different age to be “not of this world.” Thus, I would weaker team than the one that drafted this on the part of the citizenry and Church rep- goals. His Holiness Pope Francis experi- invite all not to rush in judging him, not to text. The mentioned Pontifical Council is resentatives of Ukraine. enced this encounter primarily as a spiritual remain on the reality level of those who competent in theological matters in rela- Patriarch Sviatoslav, the head of the event. He opened his remarks by noting that expect only politics from this meeting and tions with various Christian Churches and Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church, shared his we, Catholics and Orthodox, share one and want to exploit a humble pope for their communities, but is no expert in matters of impressions of the meeting in general and of the same Baptism. In the meeting, he sought human plans at all costs. If we don’t enter international politics, especially in delicate the document in particular in an interview out the presence of the Holy Spirit and into the spiritual reality of the holy father matters such as Russia’s aggression in conducted in Ukrainian by Father Ihor received His support. He emphasized that and do not discern together with him the Ukraine. Thus, the intended character of the Yatsiv. The text of the interview was shared the unity of the Churches can be achieved action of the Holy Spirit, we shall remain document was beyond their capabilities. by the Communications Office of the when we travel together on the same path. imprisoned by the prince of this world and This was exploited by the Department of Philadelphia Archeparchy of the Ukrainian From the Moscow Patriarch one imme- his followers. Then, for us, this will become External Affairs of the Russian Orthodox Catholic Church. diately sensed that this wasn’t about any a meeting that occurred but didn’t happen. Church, which is, first of all, the instrument Spirit, or theology, or actual religious mat- Speaking of the signed text of the Joint of diplomacy and external politics of the Your Beatitude, kindly share with us ters. No common prayer, an emphasis on Declaration, in general it is positive. In it are Moscow Patriarchate. your impressions of the meeting official phrases about “the fate of the raised questions, which are of concern to I would note that, as the head of our between Pope Francis and Patriarch world,” and the airport as a neutral, that is, both Catholics and Orthodox, and it opens Church, I am an official member of the Kirill. What can you say about the Joint non-ecclesial environment. The impression new perspectives for cooperation. I encour- Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Declaration they signed? was that they existed in two parallel age all to look for these positive elements. Unity, nominated already by Pope Benedict. From our experience, gained over many worlds. Did these two parallel realities However, the points which concern Ukraine However, no one invited me to express my years, we can say that when the Vatican intersect during this meeting? I don’t know, in general and specifically the UGCC raised and Moscow organize meetings or sign but according to the rules of mathematics, more questions than answers. (Continued on page 15) 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2016 No. 8 ANALYSIS Wristwatch given to wounded soldier Poroshenko denounces Russian aggression Kerry meets with Poroshenko MUNICH – Speaking on February 13 at WASHINGTON – U.S. State Department points to Russian role in Ukraine war the 2016 Munich Security Conference, Spokesperson John Kirby on February 13 Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko released the following information about by Tom Balmforth soldier from Mr. Usov’s tank brigade asks stressed that his country needs unflagging Secretary of State John Kerry’s meeting with RFE/RL what the minister said. Mr. Usov replies: support from the West, saying that the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. “He didn’t say anything much, just security of Europe and the world are at “Secretary Kerry met today on the sidelines MOSCOW – A cybersleuthing group says [expressed hope] that we’d get better... He stake in Ukraine. At a presidential panel at of the Munich Security Conference with it has uncovered new evidence pointing to also gave a gift of a watch!” the Munich conference, he addressed angry Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. The deep, direct Russian involvement in the A social-media post made by Mr. Usov a remarks to an absent Russian President secretary reaffirmed the strong support of battle of Debaltseve in early 2015, a turning day earlier, on February 21, comprises a Vladimir Putin. “Mr. Putin, this is not a civil the United States for full implementation of point in the conflict in eastern Ukraine that close-up photograph of a boxed Aviator war in Ukraine, this is your aggression... the Minsk agreement. He urged unity weakened Kyiv’s hand at peace talks. Airacobra watch with a Defense Ministry this is your soldiers who have entered my among Ukraine’s leaders, and faster prog- Using posts and photographs gleaned logo printed on the watch face.
Recommended publications
  • STUDENT 1977 October

    STUDENT 1977 October

    2 «««««••••••«•»» : THE PRESIDENT : ON SUSK Andriy Makuch : change in attitude is necessary. • • The book of Samuel relates how This idea was reiterated uyzbyf the young David stood before • Marijka Hurko in opening the I8th S • Goliath and proclaimed his In- Congress this year, and for- tention slay him. The giant was 2 3 to malized by Andrij Semotiuk's.© • amazed and took tight the threat; presentation of "The Ukrainian • subsequently, he was struck down • Students' Movement In Context" J • by a well-thrown rock. Since then, (to be printed in the next issue of • giants have taken greater heed of 2 STUDENT). It was a most listless such warnings. 2 STUDENT • Congress - the • seek and disturbing " I am not advocating we 11246-91 St. ritual burying of an albatross wish to J Edmonton. Alberta 2 Goliaths to slay, but rather mythology. There were no great • underline that a well-directed for- Canada TSB 4A2 funeral orations, no tears cried. ce can be very effective • par- • No one cared. Not that they were f ticularly if it is judiciously applied. the - incapable of it, but because , SUSK must keep this in mind over , £ entire issue was so far removed 5 9• the coming yeayear. The problems ' trom their own reality (especially ft . t we, as part off thett Ukrainian corn- - those attending their first " £ . community, no face are for- - Congress), that they had no idea • midable, andi theretht is neither time of why they should. Such a sad and bi-monthly news- nor manpower to waste. "STUDENT" is a national tri- ft spectacle must never be repeated by • The immediate necessity is to students and is published - entrenched Ideas can be very • paper for Ukrainian Canadian realistically assess our priorities 2 limiting.
  • Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence

    Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence

    Russia • Military / Security Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 5 PRINGLE At its peak, the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti) was the largest HISTORICAL secret police and espionage organization in the world. It became so influential DICTIONARY OF in Soviet politics that several of its directors moved on to become premiers of the Soviet Union. In fact, Russian president Vladimir V. Putin is a former head of the KGB. The GRU (Glavnoe Razvedvitelnoe Upravleniye) is the principal intelligence unit of the Russian armed forces, having been established in 1920 by Leon Trotsky during the Russian civil war. It was the first subordinate to the KGB, and although the KGB broke up with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the GRU remains intact, cohesive, highly efficient, and with far greater resources than its civilian counterparts. & The KGB and GRU are just two of the many Russian and Soviet intelli- gence agencies covered in Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence. Through a list of acronyms and abbreviations, a chronology, an introductory HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF essay, a bibliography, and hundreds of cross-referenced dictionary entries, a clear picture of this subject is presented. Entries also cover Russian and Soviet leaders, leading intelligence and security officers, the Lenin and Stalin purges, the gulag, and noted espionage cases. INTELLIGENCE Robert W. Pringle is a former foreign service officer and intelligence analyst RUSSIAN with a lifelong interest in Russian security. He has served as a diplomat and intelligence professional in Africa, the former Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe. For orders and information please contact the publisher && SOVIET Scarecrow Press, Inc.
  • E Helsinki Forum and East-West Scientific Exchange

    E Helsinki Forum and East-West Scientific Exchange

    [E HELSINKI FORUM AND EAST-WEST SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE Sul COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE NINETY-SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 31, 1980 [No. 89] (Committee on Science and Technology) ted for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 421 0 WASHINGTON: 1980 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DON FUQUA, Florida, Chairman ROBERT A. ROE, New Jersey JOHN W. WYDLER, New York MIKE McCORMACK, Washington LARRY WINN. JR., Kansas GEORGE E. BROWN, JR., California BARRY M. GOLDWATER, JR., California JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York HAMILTON FISH, JS., New York RICHARD L. OTTINGER, New York MANUEL LUJAN, JR., New Mexico TOM HARKIN, Iowa HAROLD C. HOLLENBECK, New Jersey JIM LLOYD, California ROBERT K. DORNAN, California JEROME A. AMBRO, New York ROBERT S. WALKER, Pennsylvania MARILYN LLOYD BOUQUARD, Tennessee EDWIN B. FORSYTHE, NeW Jersey JAMES J. BLANCHARD, Michigan KEN KRAMER, Colorado DOUG WALGREN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM CARNEY, New York RONNIE G. FLIPPO, Alabama ROBERT W. DAVIS, Michigan DAN GLICKMAN, Kansas TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin ALBERT GORE, JR., Tennessee DONALD LAWRENCE RITTER, WES WATKINS, Oklahoma Pennsylvania ROBERT A. YOUNG, Missouri BILL ROYER, California RICHARD C. WHITE, Texas HAROLD L. VOLKMER, Missouri DONALD J. PEASE, Ohio HOWARD WOLPE, Michigan NICHOLAS MAVROULES, Massachusetts BILL NELSON, Florida BERYL ANTHONY, JR., Arkansas STANLEY N. LUNDINE, New York ALLEN E.
  • September 20, 1968 Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC

    September 20, 1968 Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC

    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified September 20, 1968 Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC Citation: “Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC,” September 20, 1968, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, RGANI, F. 80, Op. 1, D. 513, Ll. 58-60. Obtained and translated by Mark Kramer. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/188129 Summary: This memorandum from KGB Chairman Andropov to the CPSU Politburo follows up on the initial report from Andropov, Shchelokov, and Malyarov. The document highlights the “malevolent views” of the group that held an unauthorized demonstration in Red Square on 25 August 1968, singling out Pavel Litvinov, Larisa Bogoraz, Viktor Fainberg, and Vadim Delaunay for particular opprobrium. Andropov stresses that the KGB will intensify its crackdown on opposition figures who try to “spread defamatory information about Soviet reality.” Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Blavatnik Family Foundation. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation Scan of Original Document Secret Copy No. 1 USSR ___ Committee of State Security of the USSR under the USSR Council of Ministers ______ 20 September 1968 No. 2205-A Moscow To the CPSU CC By way of addendum to our No. 2102 from 5 September 1968, I am reporting that the Moscow procurator, in contact with the Committee of State Security, has completed the investigation and is remanding to the court the criminal case charging L. I. BOGORAZ-BRUKHMAN (the wife of the imprisoned writer [Yulii] Daniel), P. M. LITVINOV, K. I. BABITSKII, V. I. FAINBERG, V. A. DREMLYUGA, and V. N. DELAUNAY. The guilt of these people in staging disturbances on Red Square on 25 August 1968 was confirmed by the testimony of multiple witnesses and by material evidence that was confiscated.
  • Reconceptualizing the Alien: Jews in Modern Ukrainian Thought*

    Reconceptualizing the Alien: Jews in Modern Ukrainian Thought*

    Ab Imperio, 4/2003 Yohanan PETROVSKY-SHTERN RECONCEPTUALIZING THE ALIEN: JEWS IN MODERN UKRAINIAN THOUGHT* To love ones motherland is no crime. From Zalyvakhas letter to Svitlychnyi, Chornovil, and Lukho. Whoever in hunger eats the grass of the motherland is no criminal. Andrei Platonov, The Sand Teacher Perhaps one of the most astounding phenomena in modern Ukrainian thought is the radical reassessment of the Jew. Though the revision of Jew- ish issues began earlier in the 20th century, if not in the late 19th, it became particularly salient as part of the new political narrative after the “velvet revolution” of 1991 that led to the demise of the USSR and the establish- * I gratefully acknowledge the help of two anonymous reviewers of Ab Imperio whose insightful comments helped me considerably to improve this paper. Ukrainian names in the body text are rendered in their Library of Congress Ukrainian transliteration. In cases where there is an established English (or Russian) form for a name, it is bracketed following the Ukrainian version. The spelling in the footnotes does not follow LC Ukrainian transliteration except in cases where the publishers provide their own spelling. 519 Y. Petrovsky-Shtern, Reconceptualizing the Alien... ment of an independent Ukraine. The new Ukrainian perception of the Jew boldly challenged the received bias and created a new social and political environment fostering the renaissance of Jewish culture in Ukraine, let alone Ukrainian-Jewish dialogue. There were a number of ways to explain what had happened. For some, the sudden Ukrainian-Jewish rapprochement was a by-product of the new western-oriented post-1991 Ukrainian foreign pol- icy.
  • Protest and Dissent in the Soviet Union: the Unofficial Moscow •� Journal, a Chronicle of Current Events, (American Heritage Press, 1972), 18

    Protest and Dissent in the Soviet Union: the Unofficial Moscow • Journal, a Chronicle of Current Events, (American Heritage Press, 1972), 18

    •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••r• Glasnost as Speaking TruthisPower: In partialfulfillmentoftherequirements Submitted toProfessorLindaGerstein In LateSovietRussia For theBachelorsinArtsHistory, By ElizabethHeld Haverford College a WeaponofDissent April 20,2012 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••►•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS flour, andeggs. To ProfessorLindaGerstein,whotaughtmethattobakeacakeyouneedbutter,sugar, ii •• iii •• ABSTRACT ••• In 1968, a group of Soviet dissidents began to print their own newspaper, the •• Chronicle of Current Events, and to work with western reporters to spread their message about the illegality of the ruling regime. By using their own media forms, the dissidents •• were able to break the government's monopoly on information. More importantly, they •• used the media technologies to advocate for their two key, interconnected goals of •• glasnost, or openness, and the rule of law. The dissidents made two main arguments. •• First, that glasnost was integral to creating an equitable and fair justice system. Second, that speaking truth was legal and not something the government could prosecute. •• • Glasnost served as both a rallying cry and as a weapon. The dissidents called for openness, but also used their media outlets to expose events the government wished to ••• keep quiet. • In choosing the two mantras of legality and glasnost, the dissidents consciously put themselves in the shadow of previous groups of Russian reformers who had the same ••• demands. They placed themselves in a historical debate. The dissidents also sought to •• differentiate their version of glasnost, complete openness, from various government •• leaders' definitions of the term. •• This thesis seeks to explore the way dissident media outlets forced the dual goals •• of glasnost and respect for the rule of law. It will examine the causes and forms of dissident media, and their relationship to the idea of legality.
  • Abn Correspondence Bulletin of the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations

    Abn Correspondence Bulletin of the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations

    FREEDOM FOR NATIONS ! CORRESPONDENCE FREEDOM FOR INDIVIDUALS! JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1989 CONTENTS: Carolling Ukrainian-Style ....................... 2 The Autobiography of Levko Lukyanenko ..................... 3 European Freedom Council Meeting ..............................16 Statement of the European Freedom Council .............. 16 Hon. John Wilkinson, M.P. Eastern European Policy for Western Europe .............. 19 Genevieve Aubry, M.P. Is Switzerland Ready for a New Challenge with the European Nations .......................... 26 Sir Frederic Bennett Can the Soviet Russian Empire Survive? ....................... 31 Bertil Haggman Aiding the Forces of Freedom in the Soviet Empire ................................... 34 Ukrainian Christian Democratic Front Holds Inaugural Meeting ........... 40 David Remnick Ukraine Could be Soviets’ Next Trouble Spot ..............41 Bohdan Nahaylo Specter of the Empire Haunts the Soviet Union ..........45 Appeal to the Russian Intelligentsia ......... ......................47 Freedom for Nations! Freedom for Individuals! ABN CORRESPONDENCE BULLETIN OF THE ANTI-BOLSHEVIK BLOC OF NATIONS Publisher and Owner (Verleger und Inha­ It is not our practice to pay for contribut­ ber): American Friends of the Anti-Bolshevik ed materials. Reproduction permitted only Bloc of Nations (AF ABN), 136 Second Avenue, with indication of source (ABN Corr.). New York, N.Y. 10003, USA. Annual subscription: 27 Dollars in the Zweigstelle Deutschland: A. Dankiw, USA, and the equivalent of 27 US Dollars in Zeppelinstr. 67, 8000 München 80. all other countries. Remittances to Deutsche Editorial Staff: Board of Editors Bank, Munich, Neuhauser Str. 6, Account Editor-in-Chief: Mrs. Slava Stetsko, M.A. No. 3021003, Anna Dankiw. Zeppelinstr. 67 Schriftleitung: Redaktionskollegium. 8000 München 80 Verantw. Redakteur Frau Slava Stetzko. West Germany Zeppelinstraße 67 Articles signed with name or pseudonym 8000 München 80 do not necessarily reflect the Editor’s opinion, Telefon: 48 25 32 but that of the author.
  • From Helsinki to Human Rights Watch: How an American Cold War Monitoring Group Became an International Human Rights Institution

    From Helsinki to Human Rights Watch: How an American Cold War Monitoring Group Became an International Human Rights Institution

    Peter Slezkine From Helsinki to Human Rights Watch: How an American Cold War Monitoring Group Became an International Human Rights Institution On September 7, 2010, George Soros gave Human Rights Watch (HRW) a $100 million grant, the largest in its history. ‘‘I’m afraid the United States has lost the moral high ground under the Bush administration, but the principles that Human Rights Watch promotes have not lost their universal applicability,’’ he said. ‘‘So to be more effective, I think the organization has to be seen as more international, less an American organization.’’1 Today, it is taken for granted that HRW’s scope should be international and its principles universally applicable. It seems self-evident that an organization called Human Rights Watch should strive to monitor abuses wherever they occur and to enforce universal standards on a global scale. It is also understood that to be most effective (and least vulnerable to criticism), HRW should appear to reflect the univer- sality of its principles. In its ideal form, it would operate outside the world of particular allegiances, origins, and ideologies; at the very least, it would embody a global cross-section of particular concerns. Of course, such perfect impartiality and universal representativeness must always remain elusive. A headquarters in New York and a significant percentage of American donors and staff risk tying HRW’s moral standing to that of the U.S. government, as Soros pointed out. And the opening of each new office, the issuing of each new report, and the acceptance of each new donation may be construed as examples of particular biases that would undermine HRW’s declared universalism.
  • Memorial on Admissibility on Behalf of the Government of Ukraine

    Memorial on Admissibility on Behalf of the Government of Ukraine

    Ukraine v. Russia (re Eastern Ukraine) APPLICATION NO. 8019/16 Kyiv, 8 November 2019 MEMORIAL ON ADMISSIBILITY ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1. The Russian Federation has consistently denied its involvement in the conflict in eastern Ukraine, and has sought to evade international legal responsibility by adopting a series of measures to disguise and “outsource” its military aggression in eastern Ukraine. The Kremlin’s denials of direct involvement were implausible from the outset, and were roundly rejected by the international community. All of the relevant international institutions rightly hold Moscow responsible for a pattern of conduct that has been designed to destabilise Ukraine by sponsoring separatist entities in the use of armed force against the legitimate Government and members of the civilian population. Almost from the outset, the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the European Union, and the G7 all re-affirmed Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders, and condemned the Russian Federation’s continuing proxy war in eastern Ukraine. As the conflict has continued, the evidence of Russia’s direct and indirect involvement in the violent rebellion in Donbass has become more and more apparent. Despite Russia’s crude attempts to conceal its involvement, the proof of Russian State responsibility has steadily mounted. In the face of the obvious truth, Russia’s policy of implausible deniability has fallen apart completely. 2. Ukraine submits that the human rights violations committed by Russian forces and their proxies, as particularised in this application, fall directly within Russia’s extra-territorial jurisdiction for the purposes of article 1 of the Convention.
  • The Paradigm of Scientists for Sakharov, Orlov and Sharansky (Sos)

    The Paradigm of Scientists for Sakharov, Orlov and Sharansky (Sos)

    GUERRILLA TACTICS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: THE PARADIGM OF SCIENTISTS FOR SAKHAROV, ORLOV AND SHARANSKY (SOS) (Invited speech on the occasion of the Sakharov Prize Award at the 2010 “April” meeting of the American Physical Society) February 15, 2010 Morris (Moishe ) Pripstein Physics Division, National Science Foundation I would like to thank the American Physical Society for honoring me as a co-recipient of the Sakharov Prize along with such illustrious human-rights activists as my colleagues Joe Birman and Herman Winick. I would also like to thank my wife, Flo, for her major contributions to the activities described below which led to this award and to our children, David, Jeremy and Laura, for their unstinting support throughout that hectic period. In addition, I want to express my deep appreciation to Elena Bonner for her very generous comments presented earlier in this session by her daughter, Tatiana Yankelevich, and to Tatiana and her brother Alexey Semyonov and his wife, Liza, for joining us in this occasion. This award is especially meaningful to me as it pays homage to the great scientist and human- rights champion Andrei Sakharov, a role model to many of us, and because of the outstanding previous awardees, Yuri Orlov and Xu Liangying. While many scientists have valiantly engaged in the struggle for human rights, it is this group, along with Natan Sharansky, Elena Bonner, Fang Li Zhi and the long list of other dissident and refusenik scientists who put their own lives at risk on behalf of human rights, who are the heroes of the movement and a special inspiration to the rest of us.
  • The Observance of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by the Soviet Union

    The Observance of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by the Soviet Union

    AO-A093 577 DEPARTM4ENT OF STATE WASHINGTON DC OFFICE OF EXTERNAL--ETC F/S 5/14 POLITICAL RIGHTS BY--ETCfUI 17A-A 1- 7 THE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND IUNCLASSIFIED FAR-3013 NL UflMENEMffllf INSTITUTE ON SOC& T LAW V VALERY CHALIDZE N JHE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS BY THE SOVIET UNION. Chief Consultant- Leon Lipson Consultants: Alexander Volpin I Konstantin Simis co George Ginsburgs Translation of the basic text: George Ginsburgs Collection of examples: Ludmilla Alexeyeva Pavel Litvinov This paper is written to order of the U.S. State Department I 'Lij New York, 1980 I 6'v Was p si fr~D epar~ter! of S~ i DIMUU'RIBTI NST ENT A f4rnea nerem ccu: nc, be .!-erpre!,-j 3z rev ,nt~ Approved for pu-Uc relea ;.;CY :" > "er e <- 9, i,•"-" THE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS BY THE SOVIET UNION Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Article 1. The Right of Self-Determination 9 Article 2. The Duty of States Party to the Covenant to 25 Respect and Ensure Human Rights Article 3. The Right of Men and Women to Equal Enjoyment 39 of all Civil and Political Rights Set Forth in the Covenant Article 4. The Right of States Party to the Present 41 Covenant to Take Measures Derogating from their obligations under the Present Covenant Article 5. Protection from Curtailment of any of the Rights 43 and Freedoms Recognized in the Present Covenant Article 6. Protection of the Right to Life 44 Article 7.
  • Memorialization of the Jewish Tragedy at Babi Yar Aleksandr Burakovskiy∗

    Memorialization of the Jewish Tragedy at Babi Yar Aleksandr Burakovskiy∗

    Nationalities Papers Vol. 39, No. 3, May 2011, 371–389 Holocaust remembrance in Ukraine: memorialization of the Jewish tragedy at Babi Yar Aleksandr Burakovskiy∗ Independent Scholar, United States (Received 24 November 2009; final version received 26 January 2011) At the core of the debate in Ukraine about Babi Yar lies the Holocaust. Between 1941 and 1943 1.5 million Jews perished in Ukraine, yet a full understanding of that tragedy has been suppressed consistently by ideologies and interpretations of history that minimize or ignore this tragedy. For Soviet ideologues, admitting to the existence of the Holocaust would have been against the tenet of a “Soviet people” and the aggressive strategy of eliminating national and religious identities. A similar logic of oneness is being applied now in the ideological formation of an independent Ukraine. However, rather than one Soviet people, now there is one Ukrainian people under which numerous historical tragedies are being subsumed, and the unique national tragedies of other peoples on the territory of Ukraine, such as the massive destruction of Jews, is again being suppressed. According to this political idea assiduously advocated most recently during the Yushchenko presidency, the twentieth century in Ukraine was a battle for liberation. Within this new, exclusive history, the Holocaust, again, has found no real place. The author reviews the complicated history regarding the memorialization of the Jewish tragedy in Babi Yar through three broad chronological periods: 1943–1960, 1961–1991, and 1992–2009. Keywords: Babi Yar; Jews in Ukraine; anti-Semitism; Holocaust At the core of the decades-long debate in Ukraine about the memorialization of the Jewish tragedy at Babi Yar lies a lack of acknowledgement of the Holocaust.