COVID-19'S Impacts on Utah's Oil & Gas Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COVID-19'S Impacts on Utah's Oil & Gas Industry Research Brief January 2021 COVID-19’s Impacts on Utah’s Oil & Gas Industry By Thomas Holst, M.B.A., Senior Energy Analyst, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the oil and gas sector group, failed to reach agreement on crude oil production was caught unprepared for the global shock of diminished targets in March. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of OPEC, had energy demand by shelter-in-place and stay-at-home policies. At previously adjusted its own production levels to accommodate the same time, two OPEC+ members battling for market share the hard currency needs of other cartel members. However, oversupplied global energy markets, creating an unanticipated when Russia refused to decrease production, Saudi Arabia hit energy supply shock and sending crude oil prices into a tailspin. back with a price discount and increased its own production These combined shocks threatened the viability of oil and gas levels. Markets reacted immediately to the oversupply, driving companies lacking the robust balance sheets needed to remain crude oil prices down to $30 per barrel. COVID-19 shelter-in- solvent until normal market conditions return. place orders dampened demand for gasoline and jet fuel. In the The magnitude of the coronavirus shock to energy demand is United States, year-on-year consumption of gasoline and jet forecasted to be the largest in the seven decades since World fuel showed decreases ranging from 48% to 80% as travel by 30% $70 War II. The H1N1 influenza pandemic of 1918 spread worldwide automobileSpanish and u airplaneWorld Wardwindled. II FirstBy contrast, dieselGlobal fuel, $60 oil shock Financial $50 in four waves and infected nearly 500 million people, causing used in trucks and trains that transport consumer Crisisproducts, 20% $40 Great Second 50 million fatalities. By contrast, the 2009 H1N1 influenza dropped only 25%, showing resilience in supporting increased $30 Depression oil shock pandemic was muted by a vaccine developed seven months e-commerce during COVID-19. Diesel fuel is the largest $20 10% after the outbreak. component of distillate shown in Figure 2. $10 $0 A crude oil supply shock and an energy demand shock, COVID-19 supply and demand shocks affected the price of Price per Barrel 0% -$10 caused by COVID-19, occurred in March 2020. On the supply West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the marker crude oil for the -$20 side, members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting western hemisphere. A marker crude is a fungible, highly traded -$30 Countries (OPEC), along with their partners in the larger OPEC+ -crude10% oil used as a benchmark for setting prices of other -$40 Jul-20 Jan-20 Oct-20 Jun-20 Apr-20 Feb-20 Sep-20 Mar-20 Dec-20 Nov-20 Aug-20 -20% May-20 Figure 1: Annual Change in Global Energy Demand, Figure1900 2:1910 Year-Over1920 1930 Change1940 1950 in1960 United1970 States1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Projected range of WTI prices needed to cover 1900–2020 Petroleum Consumption, 2020 vs. 2019 Uinta Basin operating expenses 30% 20.0%$70 Spanish u World War II First Global 10.0%$60 oil shock Financial 0.0%$50 Crisis Wasatch 10.2% 20% -10.0%$40 Great Second -20.0% $30 San Juan 9.5% Depression oil shock -30.0% $20 -40.0% 10% Grand 9.4% -50.0%$10 -60.0%$0 Price per Barrel Uintah 9.4% 0% -70.0%-$10 -80.0% -$20 Tooele 9.2% -90.0%-$30 -10% -$40 Duchesne 8.5% Gareld 8.5% Jul-20 Jan-20 Oct-20 Jun-20 Apr-20 Feb-20 Sep-20 Mar-20 Dec-20 Nov-20 Aug-20 May-20 -20% Jul 03, 2020 Jul 17, 2020 Jul 31, 2020 Jan 03, 2020 Jan 17, 2020 Jan 31, 2020 Oct 09, 2020 Oct 23, 2020 Jun 05, 2020 Jun 19, 2020 Apr 10, 2020 Apr 24, 2020 Feb 14, 2020 Feb 28, 2020 Sep 11, 2020 Sep 25, 2020 Mar 13, 2020 Mar 27, 2020 Dec 04, 2020 Dec 18, 2020 Nov 06, 2020 Nov 20, 2020 Aug 14, 2020 Aug 28, 2020 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Projected range ofMay 08, 2020 WTIMay 22, 2020 prices needed to cover Uinta BasinGasoline operating expensesDistillate Jet Fuel Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Source: International Energy Agency, Global Energy Review 2020 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Weekly Product Supplied 0.0% 20.0% $80 10.0% $70 -5.0% 0.0% $60 Wasatch 10.2% -10.0% $50 -20.0% Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute 411 East South Temple Street, Salt Lake$40 City, Utah 84111 801-585-5618 gardner.utah.edu -10.0% I San Juan I I 9.5% -30.0% $30 -40.0% $20 Grand 9.4% -50.0% $10 -15.0% -60.0% $0 Uintah 9.4% -70.0% -$10 -20.0% -$20 -80.0% Daily Spot Price per Barrel Tooele 9.2% -90.0% -$30 -$40 -25.0% Duchesne 8.5% Uintah Duchesne Uinta Basin Gareld 8.5% Jul-20 Jan-20 Oct-20 Oct-19 Jun-20 Apr-20 Feb-20 Sep-20 Mar-20 Dec-20 Dec-19 Nov-20 Nov-19 Aug-20 May-20 Jul 03, 2020 Jul 17, 2020 Jul 31, 2020 Jan 03, 2020 Jan 17, 2020 Jan 31, 2020 Oct 09, 2020 Oct 23, 2020 Jun 05, 2020 Jun 19, 2020 Apr 10, 2020 Apr 24, 2020 Feb 14, 2020 Feb 28, 2020 Sep 11, 2020 Sep 25, 2020 Mar 13, 2020 Mar 27, 2020 Dec 04, 2020 Dec 18, 2020 Nov 06, 2020 Nov 20, 2020 Aug 14, 2020 Aug 28, 2020 May 08, 2020 May 22, 2020 Brent WTI Gasoline Distillate Jet Fuel 7,000 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. 0.0% $30 $80 6,000 $70 -5.0%$20 $60 5,000 $50 $10 4,000 $40 -10.0% $0 $30 3,000 $20 Well Count -15.0%-$10 $10 2,000 $0 -$20 -$10 Nominal Price per Barrel -20.0% 1,000 -$20 -$30 Daily Spot Price per Barrel -$30 -$40 -$37.63 0 -$40 -25.0% Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. 4/1 4/3 4/5 4/7 4/9 Uintah 4/11 Duchesne4/13 4/15 4/17 Uinta4/19 Basin4/21 4/23 4/25 4/27 4/29 Active Oil-Producing Wells Shut-in Oil Wells Active Gas-Producing Wells Shut-in Gas Wells Jul-20 WTI Paper Contract WTI Physical Jan-20 Oct-20 Oct-19 Jun-20 Apr-20 Feb-20 Sep-20 Mar-20 Dec-20 Dec-19 Nov-20 Nov-19 Aug-20 May-20 Brent WTI $607,000 40 $30 $55 $506,000 35 $20 $45 5,000 30 $40 $10 $36 25 $354,000 $30 $32 20 $0 $28 $253,000 $26 $26 Well Count $23 15 -$10 Price per Barrel $20 $152,000 10 -$20 $10 Nominal Price per Barrel 5 1,000 Yearly Average of Rotary Rigs -$30 $5 $0 0 -$40 -$37.63 0Eagle Ford Delaware Midland Bakken Other Non-shale Jan.(TX) Feb. (TX)Mar. Apr.(TX)May Jun.(ND) Jul.PermianAug. Sep.(USA)Oct. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 4/1 4/3 4/5 4/7 4/9 4/11 4/13 4/15 4/17 4/19 4/21 4/23 4/25 4/27 4/29 Active Oil-Producing Wells Shut-in Oil(TX) Wells WTI Paper Contract WTI Physical Active Gas-Producing Wells Shut-in Gas Wells $60 40 $55 $50 35 $45 30 $40 25 $35 $36 $30 $32 20 $28 $25 $26 $26 $23 15 Price per Barrel $20 $15 10 $10 5 $5 Yearly Average of Rotary Rigs $0 0 Eagle Ford Delaware Midland Bakken Other Non-shale (TX) (TX) (TX) (ND) Permian (USA) (TX) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 30% $70 Spanish u World War II First Global $60 oil shock Financial $50 Crisis 20% $40 Great Second $30 Depression oil shock $20 10% $10 $0 Price per Barrel 0% -$10 -$20 -$30 -10% -$40 Jul-20 Jan-20 Oct-20 Jun-20 Apr-20 Feb-20 Sep-20 Mar-20 Dec-20 Nov-20 Aug-20 -20% May-20 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Projected range of WTI prices needed to cover Uinta Basin operating expenses 30% $70 Spanish u World War II First Global $60 20.0% oil shock Financial $50 10.0% Crisis 0.0% 20% $40 Great Second Wasatch 10.2% $30 -10.0% Depression oil shock -20.0% $20 10%San Juan 9.5% -30.0% $10 -40.0% Grand 9.4% $0 -50.0% Price per Barrel -$10 -60.0% 0% Uintah 9.4% -$20 -70.0% -$30 -80.0% -10%Tooele 9.2% -90.0% -$40 Duchesne 8.5% Jul-20 Jan-20 Oct-20 Jun-20 Apr-20 Feb-20 Sep-20 Mar-20 Dec-20 Nov-20 Aug-20 -20% May-20 Gareld1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 19508.5%1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Projected range of WTI prices needed to cover Jul 03, 2020 Jul 17, 2020 Jul 31, 2020 Jan 03, 2020 Jan 17, 2020 Jan 31, 2020 Uinta Basin operating expenses Oct 09, 2020 Oct 23, 2020 Jun 05, 2020 Jun 19, 2020 Apr 10, 2020 Apr 24, 2020 Feb 14, 2020 Feb 28, 2020 Sep 11, 2020 Sep 25, 2020 Mar 13, 2020 Mar 27, 2020 Dec 04, 2020 Dec 18, 2020 Nov 06, 2020 Nov 20, 2020 Aug 14, 2020 Aug 28, 2020 May 08, 2020 May 22, 2020 Gasoline Distillate Jet Fuel 20.0% Figure 3: Global Oil Prices Plummet sales outletsJan.
Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper
    WORKING PAPER The Value of Oil Price Projectiom Nebojsa Nakinnovic Leo SchrattenhoLzer October 1935 IQ-85-68 lnternrtionrl Institute tor -lid System, Anrlyth NOT FOR QUOTATION WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE AUTHORS The Value of Oil Price Projections Nebo jsa Nakicenovic Leo SchrattenhoLzer October 1935 TW-85-68 Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute or of its National Member Organizations. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 2361 Laxenburg, Austria -ABSTRACT AND SUBXAXY The central theme of this paper is the development of the international price of crude oil. A short overview of oil price his6ry is followed by a discussion of the factors that were responsible for previous, sometimes erratic, changes. We con- clude that these factors are likely to maintain their influence in the future, thus giving the forecasts of oil prices a high uncertainty. This uncertainty is reflected in several reports containing oil price proje[ctions. We argue, therefore, that a question soieiy about future oil prices must remain unanswered. Tnis does not render the efforts to examine the future futile; it simpiy means that the question shouid be rephrased. We offer one possible problem formulation that explicitly accounts for the high uncertainty. This formulation requires that specific policy probiems and options for solving them be specified before oil prices are projected - a condition that does not always hold or, at least, that does not seem to be regarded as important enougn to be described in many reports on oil price studies.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • WTI Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate
    WTI Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate Alexander Filitz Minh Khoa Nguyen Outline • Crude Oil • Value Chain • Politics • Market • Demand • Facts & Figures • Discussion Crude Oil • Flammable liquid consisting of a complex mixture of hydrocarbons of various molecular weights and other liquid organic compounds • Is recovered mostly through oil drilling • In its strictest sense, petroleum includes only crude oil, but in common usage it includes all liquid, gaseous, and solid hydrocarbons. • An oil well produces predominantly crude oil, with some natural gas dissolved in it Classification • By the geographic location it is produced in • Its API gravity (an oil industry measure of density) • Its sulfur content • Some of the common reference crudes are: • West Texas Intermediate (WTI), a very high-quality, sweet, light oil delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma for North American oil. • Brent Blend, comprising 15 oils from fields in the North Sea. • Dubai-Oman, used as benchmark for Middle East sour crude oil flowing to the Asia-Pacific region • The OPEC Reference Basket, a weighted average of oil blends from various OPEC (The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) countries West Texas Intermediate • Also known as Texas light sweet, used as a benchmark in oil pricing • API gravity of around 39.6 and specific gravity of 0.827 and 0.24% sulfur • WTI is refined mostly in the Midwest and Gulf Coast regions in the U.S • It is the underlying commodity of New York Mercantile Exchange's (NYMEX) oil futures contracts • Often referenced in news reports
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman
    FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN FROM THE CENTRE FOR NATURAL RESOURCE STUDIES May 2018 The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman MAIN CONCLUSIONS Despite the steady growth in crude oil From 2013 to 2017, after accounting for available for export, new pipeline proj- quality differences and transportation ects in Canada continue to face delays costs, the depressed price for Canadian related to environmental and regula- heavy crude oil has resulted in CA$20.7 tory impediments as well as political billion in foregone revenues for the Ca- opposition. nadian energy industry. This significant loss is equivalent to almost 1 percent of Canada’s lack of adequate pipeline ca- Canada’s national GDP. pacity has imposed a number of costly constraints on the nation’s energy sec- In 2018, the average price differen- tor including an overdependence on tial (based on the first quarter) was the US market and reliance on more US$26.30 per barrel. If the price differ- costly modes of energy transportation. ential remains at the current level, we These and other factors have resulted estimate that Canada’s pipeline con- in depressed prices for Canadian heavy straints will reduce revenues for Cana- crude (Western Canada Select) relative dian energy firms by roughly CA$15.8 to US crude (West Texas Intermediate) billion in 2018, which is approximately and other international benchmarks. 0.7 percent of Canada’s national GDP. Between 2009 and 2012, the average Insufficient pipeline capacity has re- price differential between Western sulted in substantial lost revenue for Canada Select (WCS) and West Texas the energy industry and thus imposed Intermediate (WTI) was about 13 per- significant costs on the economy as a cent of the WTI price.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Potential Influences on the Prospect of Renewable Energy Development in OPEC Members Hanan Alsadi1 1. Introduction the Global
    1 Potential Influences on the Prospect of Renewable Energy Development in OPEC Members Hanan Alsadi1 1. Introduction The global energy transitioning trend escalates due to the continuous growth of energy consumption and advancing climate change. While the total fossil fuel consumption is increasing twice as fast as the average rate over the last decade, making 70% of the global energy demand, the reckless use of fossil fuel is causing substantial damage to the environment (International Energy Agency, 2018; Šolc, 2013). An effective fix to the problem while dubious is to replace the energy source by alternatives. The renewable energy (RE) offers the most definite prospect for producing clean, sustainable power in substantial quantities, which arouses interest around the world. According to Gielen and Colleagues (2019), the RE’s share of global consumption energy would rise from 15% in 2015 to 63% in 2050. However, if this increasing trend in renewable energies would also prevail among Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), is subject to debate. They all have abundant potential to invest in renewable energy sources. Yet, some of the Middle Eastern and Arab Gulf OPEC members do not have or have a small amount of renewable energy sources. In contrast, other members have significant renewable energy sources. Researchers have studied some aspects of renewable energy and its relationship to the OPEC countries. For example, Wittmann (2013) looked at the potential for transitioning from petroleum exportation to renewable energy exportation among the OPEC countries. Still, Wittmann does not explain any specific transition strategies or plans for the Middle Eastern OPEC countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Capital Budget & Operating Plan
    2019 Capital Budget & Operating Plan Supplemental Information & Investor Update UPDATED AS OF FEBRUARY 2019 Cautionary Statement The following presentation includes forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events, such as anticipated revenues, earnings, business strategies, competitive position or other aspects of our operations, operating results or the industries or markets in which we operate or participate in general. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and are difficult to predict such as operational hazards and drilling risks; potential failure to achieve, and potential delays in achieving expected reserves or production levels from existing and future oil and gas development projects; unsuccessful exploratory activities; difficulties in developing new products and manufacturing processes; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing, maintaining or modifying company facilities; international monetary conditions and exchange rate fluctuations; changes in international trade relationships, including the imposition of trade restrictions or tariffs relating to crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG, natural gas liquids and any other materials or products (such as aluminum and steel) used in the operation of our business; our ability to collect payment when due under
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Rain Barrel?
    What is a rain barrel? A rain barrel is a container used to collect and store rainwater from your roof that would otherwise be lost to runoff and diverted out onto your property or to a storm drain and eventually to local streams or rivers. Rain barrels are also an economical way to store rain water to be used as a secondary water supply for indoor plants, flower gardens, lawns, fill the bird bath, and washing cars and windows. Rain barrels are usually about 40-60 gallons and can be purchased or made relatively easily. The parts are available at any hardware store. *Stored water is not used for drinking or bathing* Why use rain barrels? Every time it rains, unabsorbed water rushes to storm drains and directly into our local waterways. Often times this runoff carries with it pollutants it has picked up along the way depositing in them into local waterways. Any rainwater in an urban or suburban area that does not evaporate or infiltrate into the ground is considered stormwater. Infiltration is when water on the ground surface soaks into the soil. Impervious surfaces like roofs, asphalt, and concrete do not allow Rain water from your roof and driveway travels to the street and into storm drains for the infiltration to occur. eventually draining into our creeks, lakes, and rivers. Infiltration of water on pervious surfaces is important because it reduces the amount runoff and the possibility of erosion and pollutants leaving a site and entering a waterway. What can rain barrels do for you? Healthier plants.
    [Show full text]
  • References a - B
    References A - B References BIBLIOGRAPHY Addley, Craig, Bethany Neilson, Leon Basdekas, and Thomas Hardy. 2005. Virgin River Temperature Model Validation (Draft). Institute for Natural Systems Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT: Utah State University. Alder, Douglas D., and Karl F. Brooks. 1996. A History of Washington County: From Isolation to Destination. Salt Lake City, Utah: Utah State Historical Society. Aliison, James R. 2000. “Craft Specialization and Exchange in Small-Scale Societies: A Virgin Anasazi Case Study.” Unpublished PhD diss., Arizona State University. Allison, James R. 1990. “Anasazi Subsistence in the St. George Basin, Southwestern Utah.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Brigham Young University. Altschul, J. H., and H. C. Fairley. 1989. Man, Models, and Management: An Overview of the Arizona Strip and the Management of its Cultural Resources. St. George, UT: U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management. Arizona-Sonoran Desert Museum. 2015. “Western Banded Gecko.” Accessed February. http.//www.desertmuseum. org/books/nhsd_banded-gecko.php. Audubon. 2015. “Ferruginous Hawk.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/ ferruginous-hawk. Audubon. 2015. “Burrowing Owl.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/burrowing-owl. Audubon and Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2013. “Range and Point Map.” Accessed November. http://www.ebird.org/ content/ebird/html. Brennan, Thomas C. 2014. “Online Field Guide to The Reptiles and Amphibians of Arizona.” Accesed October 23. http://www.retilesofaz.org/html. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel. 2009. Utah Cougar Annual Report 2009. Salt Lake City: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • A Holistic Framework for the Study of Interdependence Between Electricity and Gas Sectors
    November 2015 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors OIES PAPER: EL 16 Donna Peng Rahmatallah Poudineh The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2015 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-042-9 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors i Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to Malcolm Keay, Howard Rogers and Pablo Dueñas for their invaluable comments on the earlier version of this paper. The authors would also like to extend their sincere gratitude to Bassam Fattouh, director of OIES, for his support during this project. A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors ii Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. ii Contents ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Linguistic Competence Coordinators' Network for State And
    Cultural and Linguistic Competence Coordinators’ Network for State and Territorial Mental Health Services (State CLC Network) March 2017 Maintained by the Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development with the cooperation and support of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Updates and Corrections? Contact Sherry Peters at slp45@georgetown.edu . ALABAMA Ginny Rountree Assistant Director Sarah Harkless Division of Health Care Management Director of Development Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Mental Health/Substance Abuse Services Division 701 Jefferson Street Alabama Department of Mental Health Phoenix, Arizona 85034 100 North Union Street, Suite 430 P. 602-417-4122 Montgomery, AL 36104 F. 602-256-6756 P: 334-242-3953 Virginia.Rountree@azahcccs.gov F: 334-242-0759 Sarah.Harkless@mh.alabama.gov ARKANSAS Steve Hamerdinger Director, Office of Deaf Services FreEtta Hemphill Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse Special Projects Clinician Services Division of Behavioral Health Services Alabama Department of Mental Health 4800 West 7th Street PO Box 301410 Little Rock, AR 72205 Montgomery, AL 36130 P: 501-658-6803 P: 334-239-3558 (VP or Voice) FreEtta.Hemphil@arkansas.gov Text: 334-652-3783 Steve.Hamerdinger@mh.alabama.gov CALIFORNIA ALASKA Marina Castillo-Augusto, M.S. Counseling Staff Services Manager Terry Hamm California Department of Public Health Tribal Liaison Office of Health Equity Division of Behavioral Health 1615 Capitol Avenue Department of Health and Social Services PO Box 997377, MS 0022 3601 C Street Sacramento, CA 95899-7377 Suite 878 P: 916-445-8347 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Marina.Augusto@cdph.ca.gov P: 907- 269-7826 F: 907-269-3623 Monika Grass terry.hamm@alaska.gov SSMI/Chief Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) Mental Health Services Division Quality Assurance Unit (72.2.57) Suite 230, MS 2702 AMERICAN SAMOA 1500 Capitol Avenue Sacramento, CA 95814 P: 916-319-8525 ARIZONA Monika.Grass@dhcs.ca.gov Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]