The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN FROM THE CENTRE FOR NATURAL RESOURCE STUDIES May 2018 The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman MAIN CONCLUSIONS Despite the steady growth in crude oil From 2013 to 2017, after accounting for available for export, new pipeline proj- quality differences and transportation ects in Canada continue to face delays costs, the depressed price for Canadian related to environmental and regula- heavy crude oil has resulted in CA$20.7 tory impediments as well as political billion in foregone revenues for the Ca- opposition. nadian energy industry. This significant loss is equivalent to almost 1 percent of Canada’s lack of adequate pipeline ca- Canada’s national GDP. pacity has imposed a number of costly constraints on the nation’s energy sec- In 2018, the average price differen- tor including an overdependence on tial (based on the first quarter) was the US market and reliance on more US$26.30 per barrel. If the price differ- costly modes of energy transportation. ential remains at the current level, we These and other factors have resulted estimate that Canada’s pipeline con- in depressed prices for Canadian heavy straints will reduce revenues for Cana- crude (Western Canada Select) relative dian energy firms by roughly CA$15.8 to US crude (West Texas Intermediate) billion in 2018, which is approximately and other international benchmarks. 0.7 percent of Canada’s national GDP. Between 2009 and 2012, the average Insufficient pipeline capacity has re- price differential between Western sulted in substantial lost revenue for Canada Select (WCS) and West Texas the energy industry and thus imposed Intermediate (WTI) was about 13 per- significant costs on the economy as a cent of the WTI price. In 2018 (based on whole, and will continue to do so. This the first quarter data), the price differ- reaffirms Canada’s critical need for ad- ential surged to 42 percent of the WTI ditional pipeline capacity. price. fraserinstitute.org FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 1 The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada Introduction Despite the strong economic case for pipelines, new pipeline projects in Canada continue to Canada’s energy industry is a major contribu- face delays related to environmental and regu- tor to Canada’s economy and provides eco- latory impediments as well as political oppo- nomic benefits to all Canadians. However, that sition. Ultimately, Canada’s lack of adequate contribution could be larger still: Canadian oil pipeline capacity has resulted in depressed producers have been facing depressed pric- prices for Canadian heavy crude and lost rev- es for their crude oil relative to other inter- enue for oil producers and thus the Canadian national benchmark prices, resulting in fore- economy as a whole. gone revenue for the Canadian energy industry. The price differential between Canadian heavy This bulletin will explain the reasons behind the crude (Western Canada Select or WCS) and US steep WTI-WCS price differential and will sub- crude (West Texas Intermediate or WTI) has sequently demonstrate Canada’s critical need widened substantially in recent months due to for new pipeline projects. We will examine the insufficient transportation infrastructure and extent to which Canada’s heavy crude is be- pipeline bottlenecks, which has dramatically ing discounted relative to other benchmark oil lowered the market price of Canadian crude oil prices and how the price differential for Cana- relative to other comparable oil prices. dian crude has grown in recent months. Finally, we will estimate the revenue lost between 2013 Western Canada’s oil exports have been rising and 2017 due to depressed prices from Cana- steadily since 2013. Despite the steady growth dian heavy oil exports, as well as the foregone in crude oil available for export, construction revenue for the energy sector associated with of pipelines to transport crude oil has been lag- insufficient pipeline capacity in 2018. ging, as many major pipeline projects have been delayed or cancelled. Insufficient pipeline ca- pacity is driving increased shipments by rail- Reasons behind the Canadian crude oil way—a more expensive (and slightly less safe) discount and the case for pipelines mode of transportation—leading to higher costs Canadian oil producers command substantially for Canadian producers.1 The issue of inad- lower prices for their crude oil relative to other equate transportion capacity has also resulted international benchmark prices. Some part of in rising crude oil inventories, putting Canadi- the differential between the Western Canadi- an oil into storage rather than into the market. an Select (WCS) price, Canada’s primary heavy crude benchmark, and the West Texas Interme- 1 According to the National Energy Board, “rail diate (WTI) benchmark price is natural and can costs are roughly double or triple the pipeline tolls” be attributed to two factors: quality differences (NEB, 2014). Meanwhile, studies show using pipe- and transportation costs. line and rail transportation of oil and gas are both quite safe; however, pipelines continue to result in In terms of quality differences, WCS crude oil fewer accidents and fewer releases of product, when is heavier than WTI crude (an API of 20.5 de- considering the amount of product transported by grees versus 34.3 degrees) and it contains 3.5 pipeline. Based on data from 2004 to 2015, pipelines percent sulphur by weight compared to WTI’s were 2.5 times less likely than rail to result in a re- lease of product when transporting a million barrels 0.9 percent (BNN News, 2013). Being heavier of oil (Green and Jackson, 2017). and more viscous, WCS is more costly to trans- fraserinstitute.org FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 2 The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada port by pipeline (as it requires more energy to While there is and will always be a natural dif- move a given distance). Further, the heavier the ferential between the WCS and WTI prices be- crude oil, and the greater the sulphur content, cause of quality differences and transportation the lower its value to a typical refiner as it will costs, Canada’s insufficient transportation in- require more complex methods to produce fuels frastructure and pipeline bottlenecks have dra- like gasoline. For these reasons, oil refiners gen- matically increased the differential beyond its erally expect to pay less for heavy WCS crude oil natural level in recent years.2 compared to light, low-sulphur WTI crude oil. Western Canadian oil exports have been rising The second component of the natural differen- steadily in recent years (figure 1). According to tial between WCS and WTI is associated with the National Energy Board’s analysis, Canada the cost to transport oil from Western Canada had 3.95 million barrels per day of oil available to US refining hubs. WCS is priced at Hardisty, for export in 2017, compared to 2.95 barrels per Alberta and WTI crude oil at Cushing, Oklaho- day in 2013, an increase of 35 percent. Despite ma. If it were not for the quality differences and the steady growth in crude oil available for ex- the impact that this has on refinery demand for port, construction of pipelines to ship oil out of competing crudes, the difference between the the region has been lagging (as shown in figure price of WTI and WCS would boil down to just 1) as major pipeline projects have been delayed the transportation cost between Hardisty and or cancelled. These include Enbridge’s Cushing. According to the Canadian Associa- tion of Petroleum Producers, the 2017 tolls to 2 The tight takeaway capacity has penalized both ship heavy oil from Hardisty to Cushing are be- Canadian heavy and light crude oil in US markets. tween US$5.45 and $6.85 per barrel, depending However, Canadian heavy crude oil (WCS) suffers more on which pipeline system is used. than light, sweet crudes due to quality differences. Figure 1: Canadian oil pipeline capacity and exports, 2013–2018 4.0 Oil available for export 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 Enbridge Mainline 1.5 Million per day barrels 1.0 Express Trans Mountain 0.5 Keystone Rangeland/ Milk River 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Source: NEB, 2016. fraserinstitute.org FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 3 The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada Northern Gateway Pipeline and TransCanada’s Canadian crude oil exports by rail were more Energy East and Eastern Mainline projects, than twelve times greater than in January 2012 which have been cancelled due to a number of (NEB, 2017). Of course, those Canadian oil pro- factors including significant regulatory hur- ducers that have resorted to shipping by rail have dles, political opposition, and changing market had to absorb the higher transportation costs. conditions. The Keystone XL pipeline proposal The more that oil producers have to depend on faced significant delays in the US as this proj- rail because of insufficient pipeline capacity, the ect was initially rejected by the Obama admin- greater the average WCS transportation cost and istration in November 2015 and finally got ap- the spread between WCS and WTI prices. proved by the Trump administration in March The inadequate transport capacity dilemma 2017. Despite receiving many of the necessary is also reflected in rising crude oil inventories regulatory approvals, Canada’s remaining pipe- in Alberta in recent years. Many oil producers line projects—the Trans Mountain Expansion have been forced to put excess production into and the Line 3 Replacement Project—along with storage tanks until sufficient capacity is avail- Keystone XL—continue to face delays related to able. Specifically, based on data provided by the environmental and regulatory concerns, politi- Alberta Energy Regulator, crude oil inventories cal opposition, and market uncertainty (Scotia- increased by 47 percent between January 2013 bank, 2018).
Recommended publications
  • Enbridge Responses to ADOE IR No. 1 Page 1 of 4 Transcanada
    Enbridge Responses to ADOE IR No. 1 Page 1 of 4 TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd. (“Keystone”) Keystone XL Pipeline Application OH-1-2009 Responses to The Alberta Department of Energy Information Request No. 1 to Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (“Enbridge”) 1.1 Reference: Written Evidence of Enbridge Pipelines Inc., dated July 30, 2009 including the attached Muse Stancil Report and CAPP June 2009 report Preamble: We understand Enbridge’s evidence indicates that generally: (1) an additional one million b/d of take-away capacity from Western Canada on the Keystone Pipeline and the Enbridge system will be built by 2010; (2) while a certain level of excess pipeline capacity is advantageous, the advantage reverses when the cost of capacity outweighs the netback benefits; (3) the Keystone XL Pipeline project would create an unnecessary and unprecedented level of excess pipeline capacity between Western Canada and U.S. markets; (4) if Keystone XL is placed into service in late 2012, it will offload volumes from the Enbridge system; (5) this off loading will increase Enbridge system shippers’ costs, shipping between Edmonton and Chicago, by Cdn$315 million (Cdn$0.75 per barrel); (6) impact could be greater if volume shipped on either base Keystone or Keystone XL were more than contracted volumes; (7) Enbridge asked Muse Stancil to estimate aggregate net benefit to Canada of the Keystone XL Pipeline and Muse Stancil estimates it would only be US$102 million in 2013, as compared to Purvin & Gertz Inc. estimate of $3.4 billion benefit to Canadian heavy crude producers alone; (8) Enbridge is advancing the “Gretna Option” as a modification the Keystone XL Pipeline; (9) the Gretna Option would reduce the capital cost of the Keystone XL Pipeline by approximately US$2 billion and would reduce tolls on Enbridge system by about Cdn$0.35 per barrel; Enbridge Responses to ADOE IR No.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Pipeline System Keystone Pipeline System
    Keystone Pipeline System Keystone Pipeline System Keystone Pipeline System An innovative and cost-competitive solution to a growing North American demand for energy, the Keystone Pipeline System will link a reliable and stable source of Canadian crude oil with U.S. demand. Upon completion, the Keystone Pipeline System will be comprised of the 2,151- mile (3,461-kilometre) Keystone Pipeline and the proposed 1,661-mile (2,673-kilometre) Keystone Gulf Coast Expansion Project (Keystone XL). TransCanada affiliates will build and operate the Keystone Pipeline System in four phases. Keystone Pipeline (Phase I) Originating at Hardisty, Alta., Keystone Phase I transports crude oil to U.S. Midwest markets at Wood River and Patoka, Ill. Keystone Phase I began commercial operation in June 2010. The Canadian portion of Keystone Phase I involved the conversion of approximately 537 miles (864 kilometres) of existing TransCanada pipeline in Saskatchewan and Manitoba from natural gas to crude oil transmission service. Along with the construction of 16 pump stations Edmonton and approximately 232 miles (373 kilometres) of new pipeline in Canada, new facilities were also required Hardisty Alberta at the Keystone Hardisty Terminal, including: three Saskatchewan operational storage tanks, an initiating pump station, Calgary Regina Manitoba and interconnections with existing pipeline systems in the Winnipeg Ontario Hardisty area. The U.S. portion of the Keystone Pipeline included the North Dakota Helena construction of 1,084 miles (1,744 kilometres) of new, 30- Bismarck Minnesota inch diameter pipeline and 23 pump stations throughout Montana North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, Missouri, and Illinois. Pierre Wisconsin Michigan South Dakota Wyoming Keystone Cushing Extension (Phase II) Iowa Chicago Measuring approximately 298 miles (480 kilometres) in Nebraska length,Ohio Keystone Phase II is an extension of Keystone Phase Lincoln Illinois Indiana I from Steele City, Neb., to Cushing, Okla.
    [Show full text]
  • WTI Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate
    WTI Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate Alexander Filitz Minh Khoa Nguyen Outline • Crude Oil • Value Chain • Politics • Market • Demand • Facts & Figures • Discussion Crude Oil • Flammable liquid consisting of a complex mixture of hydrocarbons of various molecular weights and other liquid organic compounds • Is recovered mostly through oil drilling • In its strictest sense, petroleum includes only crude oil, but in common usage it includes all liquid, gaseous, and solid hydrocarbons. • An oil well produces predominantly crude oil, with some natural gas dissolved in it Classification • By the geographic location it is produced in • Its API gravity (an oil industry measure of density) • Its sulfur content • Some of the common reference crudes are: • West Texas Intermediate (WTI), a very high-quality, sweet, light oil delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma for North American oil. • Brent Blend, comprising 15 oils from fields in the North Sea. • Dubai-Oman, used as benchmark for Middle East sour crude oil flowing to the Asia-Pacific region • The OPEC Reference Basket, a weighted average of oil blends from various OPEC (The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) countries West Texas Intermediate • Also known as Texas light sweet, used as a benchmark in oil pricing • API gravity of around 39.6 and specific gravity of 0.827 and 0.24% sulfur • WTI is refined mostly in the Midwest and Gulf Coast regions in the U.S • It is the underlying commodity of New York Mercantile Exchange's (NYMEX) oil futures contracts • Often referenced in news reports
    [Show full text]
  • Follow-Up Letter
    March 2, 2018 President Margarette May Macaulay Commissioner Antonia Urrejola Commissioner Francisco José Eguiguren Praeli Commissioner Esmeralda Arosemena de Troitiño Commissioner Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva Commissioner Joel Hernández García Commissioner Flávia Piovesan Executive Secretary Paulo Abrão Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 1889 F Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Re: Update on Effect of U.S. Executive Order “Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approvals for High Priority Infrastructure Projects” Dear Commissioners Eguiguren Praeli, Macaulay, Urrejola, Arosemena de Troitiño, Vargas Silva, and Piovesan, and Executive Secretary Abrão, We, the undersigned Indigenous and civil society organizations, write to update the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on President Trump’s Executive Order “Expediting Environmental Review and Approvals for High Priority Infrastructure Projects,” (Infrastructure EO) with a focus on developments since the March 21, 2017 hearing1 on this matter. The actions taken in the last year in direct and indirect furtherance of the Infrastructure EO – including granting permission for construction without conducting appropriate assessments and silencing opposition to that permission – severely impact the rights of Indigenous peoples in the United States to their land and culture, as well as to free, prior, and informed consent. We ask the Commission to maintain its involvement in monitoring and responding to this situation, including by taking the specific actions listed at the conclusion of
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Capital Budget & Operating Plan
    2019 Capital Budget & Operating Plan Supplemental Information & Investor Update UPDATED AS OF FEBRUARY 2019 Cautionary Statement The following presentation includes forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events, such as anticipated revenues, earnings, business strategies, competitive position or other aspects of our operations, operating results or the industries or markets in which we operate or participate in general. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and are difficult to predict such as operational hazards and drilling risks; potential failure to achieve, and potential delays in achieving expected reserves or production levels from existing and future oil and gas development projects; unsuccessful exploratory activities; difficulties in developing new products and manufacturing processes; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing, maintaining or modifying company facilities; international monetary conditions and exchange rate fluctuations; changes in international trade relationships, including the imposition of trade restrictions or tariffs relating to crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG, natural gas liquids and any other materials or products (such as aluminum and steel) used in the operation of our business; our ability to collect payment when due under
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Complaint
    Case 3:21-cv-00065 Document 71 Filed on 06/01/21 in TXSD Page 1 of 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF ARKANSAS; STATE OF FLORIDA; STATE OF GEORGIA; STATE OF KANSAS; COMMONWEATH OF KENTUCKY; STATE OF INDIANA; STATE OF LOUISIANA; STATE OF Civ. Action No. 3:21-cv-00065 MISSISSIPPI; STATE OF MISSOURI; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA; STATE OF OHIO; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA; STATE OF UTAH; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; and STATE OF WYOMING, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States; ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of State; MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; Case 3:21-cv-00065 Document 71 Filed on 06/01/21 in TXSD Page 2 of 59 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; JENNIFER GRANHOLM, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Energy; MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Agriculture; PETE BUTTIGIEG, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation; SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as Commanding General of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Protests Against Trump's Immigration Executive Order May Have Helped
    Protests against Trump’s immigration executive order may have helped shift public opinion against it. blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2017/02/12/protests-against-trumps-immigration-executive-order-may-have-helped-shift-public-opinion-against-it/ 2/12/2017 Donald Trump’s executive order preventing the entry of refugees and those from seven Muslim- majority countries has sparked protests across the country and the world. But have those protests had an effect on public opinion? Loren Collingwood, Nazita Lajevardi, and Kassra Oskooii present preliminary findings from a survey conducted before and after President Trump’s executive order. They find that after the ban, 25 percent more Democrats and an additional 15 percent of Republicans became opposed to it. In addition, one in five of all respondents stated that the protests had an impact on their views towards immigration policy. On Friday, January 27th, President Donald Trump signed executive order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States.” The order made changes to immigration policies and procedures and banned for 90 days the entry into the United States of individuals from seven predominantly Muslim countries. The ban set off a fury of protests across US cities and airports. Thousands of Americans from coast to coast chanted slogans such as “No hate, no fear, refugees are welcome here.” While the ban raises several important Constitutional questions that are making their way through the nation’s courts, two public opinion questions have emerged: 1) Did the ban, and ensuing controversy shift public opinion, and if so amongst whom? 2) Did the demonstrations specifically shift public opinion against the ban? Anticipating the executive order, we fielded a two-wave panel survey of 423 respondents between January 24-27th but before the president announced the executive order.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Billion for Cancellation of Keystone XL Pipeline Project Aviana Cooper University of Baltimore, [email protected]
    University of Baltimore Journal of International Law Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 6 Volume IV, No. 2 2015-2016 2016 Emerging Issues: Transcanada v. Obama Administration – 15 Billion for Cancellation of Keystone XL Pipeline Project Aviana Cooper University of Baltimore, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ubjil Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Aviana (2016) "Emerging Issues: Transcanada v. Obama Administration – 15 Billion for Cancellation of Keystone XL Pipeline Project," University of Baltimore Journal of International Law: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ubjil/vol4/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Transcanada v. Obama Administration – 15 Billion for Cancellation of Keystone XL Pipeline Project By Aviana Cooper* TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP and TC Oil Pipeline Op- erations Inc., subsidiaries of TransCanada Corporation (“TransCana- da”), lost their seven-year bid with the United States (U.S.) Govern- ment for a permit to complete the $5.4 billion oil pipeline connecting Canada and the U.S.1 On November 6, 2015, President Obama
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-07-315 Crude Oil: California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Are
    United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters January 2007 CRUDE OIL California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Are Consistent with Broader Market Trends a GAO-07-315 January 2007 CRUDE OIL Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Highlights of GAO-07-315, a report to Are Consistent with Broader Market congressional requesters Trends Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found California is the nation’s fourth California crude oil price differentials have experienced numerous and large largest producer of crude oil and fluctuations over the past 20 years. The largest spike in the price differential has the third largest oil refining began in mid-2004 and continued into 2005, during which the price industry (behind Texas and differential between WTI and a California crude oil called Kern River rose Louisiana). Because crude oil is a from about $6 to about $15 per barrel. This increase in the price differential globally traded commodity, natural and geopolitical events can affect between WTI and California crude oils occurred in a period of generally its price. These fluctuations affect increasing world oil prices during which prices for both WTI and California state revenues because a share of crude oils rose. Differentials between WTI and other oils also expanded in the royalty payments from the same time period. The differentials have since fallen somewhat but companies that lease state or remain relatively high by historical standards. federal lands to produce crude oil are distributed to the states. Recent trends in California crude oil price differentials are consistent with a number of changing market conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Canada Cross- Border Petroleum Trade
    U.S.-Canada Cross- Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits March 2021 Submitted to: American Petroleum Institute 200 Massachusetts Ave NW Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001 Submitted by: Kevin DeCorla-Souza ICF Resources L.L.C. 9300 Lee Hwy Fairfax, VA 22031 U.S.-Canada Cross-Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits This report was commissioned by the American Petroleum Institute (API) 2 U.S.-Canada Cross-Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 4 II. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 III. Overview of U.S.-Canada Petroleum Trade ................................................................. 7 U.S.-Canada Petroleum Trade Volumes Have Surged ........................................................... 7 Petroleum Is a Major Component of Total U.S.-Canada Bilateral Trade ................................. 8 IV. North American Oil Production and Refining Markets Integration ...........................10 U.S.-Canada Oil Trade Reduces North American Dependence on Overseas Crude Oil Imports ..................................................................................................................................10 Cross-Border Pipelines Facilitate U.S.-Canada Oil Market Integration...................................14
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Financial Markets in the Pricing of Crude Oil: An
    THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL MARKETS IN THE PRICING OF CRUDE OIL: AN EXAMINATION OF OIL PRICING THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL CHANGES OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A DISSERTATION IN Economics and Social Sciences Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by STEPHANIE LEIGH SHELDON B.A., Webster University, 2005 Kansas City, Missouri 2016 © 2016 STEPHANIE LEIGH SHELDON ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL MARKETS IN THE PRICING OF CRUDE OIL: AN EXAMINATION OF OIL PRICING THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL CHANGES OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Stephanie L. Sheldon, Candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2016 ABSTRACT The debate over the causes of the path of the price of oil over the twenty-first century has failed to address the method of oil pricing. The thesis guiding this dissertation is that the crude oil pricing method constrains the influence of financial investors in oil futures via (1) a two-part price system, (2) the role of both spot and contract markets, and (3) the connections between the futures market and the specific physical market related to the futures contract. Market participants construct the pricing method and adjust it through historical time and context, similar to methods of pricing found in manufacturing and retail markets. The details of the physical oil market, grounded in the pricing method, leads to the application in chapter 5. The chapter examines the behavior of prices for WTI and Brent-related futures markets as well as for one light sweet and one medium sour crude oil at the US Gulf coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil
    CHARACTERIZATION OF WEST TEXAS INTERMEDIATE CRUDE OIL, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRUE BOILING POINT, DENSITY, AND VISCOCITY CURVES FOR THE OIL WITH THE HELP OF ASTM STANDARD. By Prasad S. Mudgal Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Of MASTER OF ENGINEERING Major Subject: Petroleum Engineering At DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY Halifax, Nova Scotia March, 2014 © Copyright by Prasad S. Mudgal, 2014 I DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY PETROLEUM ENGINEERING The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate Studies for acceptance a thesis entitled “CHARACTERIZATION OF WEST TEXAS INTERMEDIATE CRUDE OIL, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRUE BOILING POINT, DENSITY, AND VISCOCITY CURVES FOR THE OIL WITH THE HELP OF ASTM STANDARD.” by Prasad Subhash Mudgal in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering. Dated: March, 2014 Supervisor: _________________________________ Reader: _________________________________ II DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DATE: March, 2014 AUTHOR: Prasad Subhash Mudgal TITLE: CHARACTERIZATION OF WEST TEXAS INTERMEDIATE CRUDE OIL, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRUE BOILING POINT, DENSITY, AND VISCOCITY CURVES FOR THE OIL WITH THE HELP OF ASTM STANDARD. DEPARTMENT OR SCHOOL: Petroleum Engineering DEGREE: Master Of Engineering CONVOCATION: October YEAR: 2014 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non- commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. _______________________________ Signature of Author The author reserves other publication rights. Neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author’s written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than the brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged.
    [Show full text]