DOCSLIB.ORG

Endangered Fish Recovery Efforts in the State of Wyoming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Endangered Fish Recovery Efforts in the State of Wyoming Endangered Fish Recovery Efforts by the State of Wyoming Pete Cavalli Endangered Species Lived in the Upper Green River… Illustrations by Joseph Tomelleri Pikeminnow near Flaming Gorge Dam …Until It was Poisoned and Dammed Rotenone Application: over 200 miles upstream of Flaming Gorge Dam Big Sandy area Little Hole area So, Why is Wyoming Involved? • The purpose of the Recovery Program is to recover the endangered fishes while water development proceeds in compliance with all applicable Federal and State laws. • The Program provides Endangered Species Act compliance for federal, tribal, state, and private water projects throughout the Colorado River Basin above Lake Powell. >119,000 af/year covered in Wyoming How is Wyoming Involved? Active Participant in UCREFRP Represented on all committees Follow NNF Stocking Procedures, Basin-wide Strategy, etc. Contributed $2,709,100 through FY 2016 UCREFRP Recovery Elements Research and Monitoring : Species Extirpated In WY Habitat Development: Species Extirpated in WY Stocking Endangered Fish: Suitable Habitat Inundated Habitat and Flow Management Nonnative Fish Management Information and Education Flow Management Instream Flow 130 segments >2% of stream miles in WY Many segments in the Green River basin Obtaining New Water Rights e.g., Pine Creek has direct flow and storage from both purchased rights and donated rights Other Mechanisms e.g., Pilot System Water Conservation Program Nonnative Fish Management: Burbot (aka ling, eelpout, etc.) Green River Drainage Green R. New Fork R. 2013 2006 Big Sandy 2007 R. 2007-09 2003 Fontenelle Res. Big Sandy 2005 2001 Res. Jim Bridger Pond 2004 Green R. 2003 2007 Bitter Native to Wind/Bighorn and 2015 Cr. Powder/Tongue basins 2006 Blacks Fork R. Flaming Gorge -Extirpated from Res. Powder/Tongue 3 BBT caught since 2010 Green R. Yampa R. Illegally introduced to Big Sandy Res., Fontenelle Res., and possibly Flaming Gorge Res. Why Are Burbot A Problem? Illegally introduced to the Green River basin Rapid range expansion Long lived (up to 20 years) and they get big (40+ inches) Abundant in some habitats, which are common Very aggressive predator – large mouth enables them to eat forage (e.g., fish) half their length High fecundity (63,000 to 3.5 million eggs) Most active in water temps below 50F Few predators in the Green River drainage Nonnative Fish Management: Research Topics studied include: -age and growth -diet -movement -habitat use -sampling techniques -spawning ecology -rotenone toxicity -jumping ability -exploitation Nonnative Fish Management: Research Collaboration Cooperators Include: Wyoming Game and Fish Department Utah Division of Wildlife Resources University of Wyoming University of Idaho Utah State University Colorado State University Montana State University Nonnative Fish Management: Fishing Regulations Regulations have evolved over the last decade Started by increasing harvest limit (6 to 25) and then removing it (now there is no harvest limit) Allowed the use of up to six fishing rods during the winter Added a “must kill” regulation, and later classified burbot as nongame species outside of its native range to deal with the mercury issue; this allowed anglers to legally dispose of unwanted burbot (required action by the Wyoming Legislature) Use of artificial light allowed beginning in 2015 Nonnative Fish Management: Fishing Regulation Awareness Messages about laws related to illegal movement of fish included in Fishing Regulations, Angler Newsletters, and Press Releases $2,500 reward available for information related to illegal fish stocking Fine of up to $10,000 and up to one year imprisonment for illegally stocking fish Nonnative Fish Management: Harvest Burbot can be impacted by angling Regulation changes to increase mortality Supporting burbot tournaments -Removed ~30,000 fish and brought exposure to the problem Mechanical removal in Big Sandy drainage Information and Education: Outreach Radio Television Newspapers Angler Newsletters School Presentations Topics covered include: -Food web impacts -Burbot biology -Research results -Angling techniques -Recipes -etc. Information and Education: Products Native Fish Products Produced -Posters -Stickers -Magnets Given Away at Local Events -Kid’s Fishing Day -Parades -School Activities -Festivals In Summary, the State of Wyoming Actively participates in UCREFRP Has an active water management program Has aggressively attacked problematic exotic species such as burbot, white sucker, and northern pike Has changed fishing regulations to address problems associated with exotic species Has an active program to educate the public about the reason for wildlife management actions and the value of native species Thank you. Any questions?.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • West Fork Blacks Fork River Mileage : Studied: 11.9 Miles, from Source to Trailhead Eligible: Same
    West Fork Blacks Fork Suitability Evaluation Report (SER) STUDY AREA SUMMARY Name of River : West Fork Blacks Fork River Mileage : Studied: 11.9 miles, from source to trailhead Eligible: same Location : Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Mountain View Ranger District, Congressional District West Fork Summit County, Utah 1 Blacks Fork Start End Classification Miles NE ¼ SW ¼ Sect. 10, T 1 NE ¼ NE ¼ Sect. 11, T 1 N, R 11 Segment 1 Wild 8.0 S, R 11 E, SLM E, SLM NE ¼ NE ¼ Sect. 11, T 1 N, NE ¼ NW ¼ Sect. 26, T 2 N, R 11 Segment 2 Scenic 3.9 R 11 E, SLM E, SLM Physical Description of River Segment : This stream flows between elevations that range between 9,200-12,000 feet. The stream meanders through a relatively wide valley and outwash terraces. The West Fork valley bottom is fairly broad with some large meadows and willow bottoms. Appendix A – Suitability Evaluation Reports A-392 The upper portion of this segment is typical of the alpine and subalpine communities of the Uinta Mountains. Krummholz spruce communities occur at higher elevations, while Engelmann spruce, subalpine fir, and lodgepole pine dominate at mid to lower elevations along this segment. Aspen communities and aspen/conifer communities also occur at lower elevations. Riparian communities typically occur as broad meadows dominated by tall and low growing willows with herbaceous undergrowth. Narrow riparian corridors with scattered tall willows growing beneath conifer overstories generally separate these meadows. This segment is more or less natural in appearance, with local dispersed recreation and livestock grazing impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • References a - B
    References A - B References BIBLIOGRAPHY Addley, Craig, Bethany Neilson, Leon Basdekas, and Thomas Hardy. 2005. Virgin River Temperature Model Validation (Draft). Institute for Natural Systems Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT: Utah State University. Alder, Douglas D., and Karl F. Brooks. 1996. A History of Washington County: From Isolation to Destination. Salt Lake City, Utah: Utah State Historical Society. Aliison, James R. 2000. “Craft Specialization and Exchange in Small-Scale Societies: A Virgin Anasazi Case Study.” Unpublished PhD diss., Arizona State University. Allison, James R. 1990. “Anasazi Subsistence in the St. George Basin, Southwestern Utah.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Brigham Young University. Altschul, J. H., and H. C. Fairley. 1989. Man, Models, and Management: An Overview of the Arizona Strip and the Management of its Cultural Resources. St. George, UT: U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management. Arizona-Sonoran Desert Museum. 2015. “Western Banded Gecko.” Accessed February. http.//www.desertmuseum. org/books/nhsd_banded-gecko.php. Audubon. 2015. “Ferruginous Hawk.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/ ferruginous-hawk. Audubon. 2015. “Burrowing Owl.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/burrowing-owl. Audubon and Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2013. “Range and Point Map.” Accessed November. http://www.ebird.org/ content/ebird/html. Brennan, Thomas C. 2014. “Online Field Guide to The Reptiles and Amphibians of Arizona.” Accesed October 23. http://www.retilesofaz.org/html. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel. 2009. Utah Cougar Annual Report 2009. Salt Lake City: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Linguistic Competence Coordinators' Network for State And
    Cultural and Linguistic Competence Coordinators’ Network for State and Territorial Mental Health Services (State CLC Network) March 2017 Maintained by the Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development with the cooperation and support of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Updates and Corrections? Contact Sherry Peters at [email protected] . ALABAMA Ginny Rountree Assistant Director Sarah Harkless Division of Health Care Management Director of Development Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Mental Health/Substance Abuse Services Division 701 Jefferson Street Alabama Department of Mental Health Phoenix, Arizona 85034 100 North Union Street, Suite 430 P. 602-417-4122 Montgomery, AL 36104 F. 602-256-6756 P: 334-242-3953 [email protected] F: 334-242-0759 [email protected] ARKANSAS Steve Hamerdinger Director, Office of Deaf Services FreEtta Hemphill Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse Special Projects Clinician Services Division of Behavioral Health Services Alabama Department of Mental Health 4800 West 7th Street PO Box 301410 Little Rock, AR 72205 Montgomery, AL 36130 P: 501-658-6803 P: 334-239-3558 (VP or Voice) [email protected] Text: 334-652-3783 [email protected] CALIFORNIA ALASKA Marina Castillo-Augusto, M.S. Counseling Staff Services Manager Terry Hamm California Department of Public Health Tribal Liaison Office of Health Equity Division of Behavioral Health 1615 Capitol Avenue Department of Health and Social Services PO Box 997377, MS 0022 3601 C Street Sacramento, CA 95899-7377 Suite 878 P: 916-445-8347 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 [email protected] P: 907- 269-7826 F: 907-269-3623 Monika Grass [email protected] SSMI/Chief Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) Mental Health Services Division Quality Assurance Unit (72.2.57) Suite 230, MS 2702 AMERICAN SAMOA 1500 Capitol Avenue Sacramento, CA 95814 P: 916-319-8525 ARIZONA [email protected] Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Evanston Fort Bridger Lyman Urie Granger
    GRANGER Modern d Little a EmigrantHwy 30 America o Trail Marker R ca Exit 66 eri D le Am d Litt Exit 68 Church Butte/ Ol Dog Spring was frequented by locals To New York City G and became a natural watering hole for Naggi’s B Lincoln Highway tourists. It led to the A Hamblin Park (formerly City Park) establishment of a filling station nearby, “Boilers” is the local term for a series Blacks Fork Bridge, built in 2014 was a public campground established by appropriately known as Oasis. The of hot springs along the Lincoln Highway to replace an earlier bridge from 1921, the City of Evanston in the early 1920s foundation for the pumps and other ruins where warm mineral water bubbles to has replica Lincoln Highway markers and in response to increased automobile can still be seen. Made from railroad ties, N the surface and forms mineral-encrusted pipe railing reminiscent of its predecessor. tourism. The park catered to “Tin Can the collapsing station was moved approxi- pools. Though lacking the spectacle of The 1921 bridge, in turn, replaced an even Tourists,” a term describing budget trav- mately 150 yards northeast. Yellowstone, this geothermal activity earlier timber trestle bridge. The 1921 elers who ate from tin cans, drove Tin The story goes that Dog Spring got its attracted Lincoln Highway tourists and bridge served Lincoln Highway drivers Lizzies (Ford Model Ts), and camped at name when a poodle, belonging to a female Evanston locals, who came here to picnic until 1932 when the road was re-routed the side of the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Green River Basin Water Planning Process
    FINAL REPORT Green River Basin Water Planning Process February, 2001 Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission Basin Planning Program States West Water Resources Corporation Acknowledgements The States West team would like to acknowledge the assistance of the many individuals, groups, and agencies that contributed to the compilation of this document. At the risk of possible omission, these include: The Green River Basin Advisory Group (facilitated by Mr. Joe Lord) The Wyoming Water Development Office River Basin Planning Staff The Wyoming Water Resources Data System The Wyoming State Engineer’s Office The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality The Wyoming State Geological Survey The University of Wyoming Spatial Data and Visualization Center The Wyoming Game and Fish Department Dr. Larry Pochop, University of Wyoming The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Seedskadee National Wildlife Refuge The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Bridger-Teton, Wasatch-Cache, Ashley, and Medicine Bow National Forests) The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management The U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Wyoming Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources Cover: Millich Ditch, East Fork Smiths Fork Prepared in association with: Boyle Engineering Corporation Purcell Consulting, P.C. Water Right Services, L.L.C. Watts and Associates, Inc. CHAPTER CONTENTS (Individual Chapters have page number listings) ACRONYM LIST I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction B. Description C. Water-Related History of the Basin D. Wyoming Water Law E. Interstate Compacts II. BASIN WATER USE AND WATER QUALITY PROFILE A. Overview B. Agricultural Water Use C.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Ozone Pollution in Utah's Uinta Basin Is Attenuating
    atmosphere Article Winter Ozone Pollution in Utah’s Uinta Basin is Attenuating Marc L. Mansfield * and Seth N. Lyman Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Utah State University Uintah Basin, 320 North Aggie Boulevard, Vernal, UT 84078, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: marc.mansfi[email protected] Abstract: High concentrations of ground-level ozone have been observed during wintertime in the Uinta Basin of western Utah, USA, beginning in 2010. We analyze existing ozone and ozone precursor concentration data from 38 sites over 11 winter seasons and conclude that there has been a statistically significant (p < 0.02) decline in ozone concentration over the previous decade. Daily exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone (70 ppb) have been trending downward at the rate of nearly four per year. Ozone and NOx concentrations have been trending downward at the rates of about 3 and 0.3 ppb per year, respectively. Concentrations of organics in 2018 were at about 30% of their values in 2012 or 2013. Several markers, annual ozone exceedance counts and median ozone and NOx concentrations, were at their largest values in the period 2010 to 2013 and have never recovered since then. We attribute the decline to (1) weakening global demand for oil and natural gas and (2) more stringent pollution regulations and controls, both of which have occurred over the previous decade. We also see evidence of ozone titration when snow cover is absent. Keywords: winter ozone; data analysis; Uinta Basin; Utah 1. Introduction Many winters in the Uinta Basin of eastern Utah display high concentrations of ground-level ozone.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2018 Wagon Tongue Newsltr
    Winter ISSUE 2018 In 1928, Fort Bridger was designated a Wyoming Historical Site. This was about 75 years after Jim Bridger, a fur trader had established his trading post along the emigrant trail to California and Oregon. Fort Bridger is located on the Blacks Fork of the Green River in Wyoming. It was considered a vital resupply post for emigrants on the Oregon, California and Mormon Trails. It later served as a crossroad for the Pony Express Route, Transcontinental Railroad and the Lincoln Highway. Today, it is still located in the Bridger Valley, also named for Jim Bridger, just off Interstate 80. Jim Bridger had the foresight that emigrants would need to replenish their supplies, having traveled through Wyoming without any other place to purchase supplies since Fort Laramie. He and business partner, Louis Vasquez, built their trading post in a fertile valley that emigrants could rest and replenish supplies before traveling on to Fort Hall or on the new route to the Salt Lake. As emigrants traveled, they had expectations of an established trading post so with the exception of the abundance of grass and water that had a variety of fish for the emigrants, they were sadly disappointed when they arrived at Fort Bridger, "Fort Bridger, as it is called, is a small trading-post, established and now occupied by Messrs. Bridger and Vasquez. The buildings are two or three miserable log-cabins, rudely constructed, and bearing but a faint resemblance to habitable houses. Its is in a handsome and fertile bottom of the small stream on which we are encamped, about two miles south of the point where the old wagon trail, via Fort Hall, makes an angle, and takes a northwesterly course." - Edwin Bryant, 1848 Fort Bridger was a significant part of history for the emigrants It was also at Fort Bridger that the fated Donner Party changed their route.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Table L\Lo
    Union Pacific Railroad Company SOUTH CEI\ITRJ\L DISTRICT Time-Table l\lo. 3 Effective Sund_ay9 June 269 1977 at 12:01 A.M. Mountain Time East of Las Vegas, Nevada Pacific Time West of Las Vegas, Nevada For Employees Only! RADIO PROCEDURE R. E. IRION J. BOWEN General Manager General Superintendent Transportation RULE 12(5) When radio communication is used to authorize a train or engin'e to proceed through the limits of a Form Y train order the engineer of the train and the employe in charge named in the Form Y UTAH DIVISION train order must use the following radio procedure: W. A. RIDGE, Superintendent, Salt Lake "U.P. General Foreman A. B. Smith calling Engineer U.P. Extra City, Utah 3900 West." L. D. NELSON, Assistant Superintendent . ...... Salt Lake C!ty, Utah "Engineer U.P. Extra 3900 West to Smith. Go ahead." R. V, WADE, Terminal Superintendent , ... .. ... Salt Lake C!ty, Utah D. E. BERGERON, Assistant Terminal Supt.. .. Salt Lake C!tY, Utah "General Foreman Smith to Engineer U.P. Extra 3900 West. I am M. L. RAWLINSON, Terminal Train master . .. .... Salt Lake Ci_ty, Utah in charge of work between M.P. 107 and M.P. 109 Train Order No. 45. G. L. LEWIS, Terminal Trainmaster . .. .. .. .. .. Salt Lake ~!tY, Utah Men and machines are clear. You may proceed through the limits M. NAVOICHICK, Terminal Trainmaster ... .. Salt Lake C!ty, Utah of Order No. 45 at ( ..... MPH repeat . ... MPH) (Normal Speed). E. A. RIGDON, Trainmaster .. .. .. ... .. ..... Salt Lake City, Utah Acknowledge." B. H. DOXEY, Terminal Superintendent . .•. ... .. .. Ogden, Utah G.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Lake County Resource Guide
    Salt Lake County Resource Guide Resources for: Salt Lake County, Utah Salt Lake County, Utah Resource Guide Table of Contents I. State Resources ............................................................................................. 3 II. Community-Based Educational Programs ..................................................... 5 a. Diabetes ......................................................................................................... 5 b. COPD ............................................................................................................. 6 c. CAD ................................................................................................................ 6 d. Heart Failure .................................................................................................. 7 III. Social Resources .......................................................................................... 7 a. Transportation .............................................................................................. 7 b. Financial/ Public Benefits .............................................................................. 8 c. Prescription Drug Expense Assistance ......................................................... .9 d. Behavioral Health ......................................................................................... 11 e. Substance Abuse ......................................................................................... 11 f. Adult Day Care ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Salinity in Streams of the Green River Basin, Wyoming
    AN ANALYSIS OF SALINITY IN STREAMS OF THE GREEN RIVER BASIN, WYOMING U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Woter-Resources Investigations 77-103 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA 1. Report No. 3. Recipient's Accession No. SHEET 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date An analysis of salinity in streams of the Green River Basin, October 1977 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. Lewis L. DeLong No- USGS/WRI 77-103 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division 2120 Capitol Avenue 11. Contract/Grant No. Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division Covered 2120 Capitol Avenue Final Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 14. 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstracts Disso ivecj-solids concentrations and loads can be estimated from streamflow records using a regression model derived from chemical analyses of monthly samples. The model takes seasonal effects into account by the inclusion of simple-harmonic time functions. Monthly mean dissolved-solids loads simulated for a 6-year period at U.S. Geological Survey water-quality stations in the Green River Basin of Wyoming agree closely with corresponding loads estimated from daily specific-conductance record In a demonstration of uses of the model, an average gain of 114,000 tons of dissolved solids per year was estimated for a 6-year period in a 70-mile reach of the Green River from Fontenelle Reservoir to the town of Green River, including the lower 30-mile reach of the Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Fishing Opportunities Southwest Wyoming
    0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20Miles 30 40 50 Miles Miles Miles Miles Big Horn Canyon River ¤£212 No ¤£212 ¤£85 rth ForkFor National Recreatioonn River ¤£85 kss RiveRiver Cllaarrk Cody Area ¤£85 AG iver Interstate¤£85 Highway Lovell Tongue Ye Lama -* Fork Arctic Grayling llowstone R 120 F «¬ Where they are¤£ 14 What’s there How to get there -* ¤£85 Bighorn Powe ll Missouri r ¤£85 US Highway TM Tiger Muskee Big Horn Buffalo Shoshonene -* F Lake ¤£14A 1. Sage Creek Sheridan CT 1. From Mountain View, take WY 414 to the east and south for 12.5 miles. The road crosses Sage Creek. stone ¬« F Powder w ¬« -* ¤£14A River 2. From Mountain View, take WY 410 south and west for 10.75 miles. Turn south on gravel road for 5 Yello State Highway A Camping River Black -* 2. Willow Creek CT BK ¤£14 River ¬« ¤£14 FF J miles, then west on dirt road for 1 mile to the creek crossing. Shoshone BLM Field Office L Picnicking ¤£310 CT 3. From Mountain View, take«¬59 WY 410 to the south and west to the end of the pavement, about 12.5 miles. d ¬« 3. Meeks Cabin FFWF A J H ¬« Follow the signs and take the left fork to Dethe vilswest andTo wesouthr for about 12 miles to the dam. BLM Field Office Boundary FielRestroomsd Hills National N 4. Sulphur Creek Reservoir RT BR CT 4. From Evanston, take WY 150 south for 9 miles.
    [Show full text]