The Yugoslav Drama
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
France and the Dissolution of Yugoslavia Christopher David Jones, MA, BA (Hons.)
France and the Dissolution of Yugoslavia Christopher David Jones, MA, BA (Hons.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History August 2015 © “This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution.” Abstract This thesis examines French relations with Yugoslavia in the twentieth century and its response to the federal republic’s dissolution in the 1990s. In doing so it contributes to studies of post-Cold War international politics and international diplomacy during the Yugoslav Wars. It utilises a wide-range of source materials, including: archival documents, interviews, memoirs, newspaper articles and speeches. Many contemporary commentators on French policy towards Yugoslavia believed that the Mitterrand administration’s approach was anachronistic, based upon a fear of a resurgent and newly reunified Germany and an historical friendship with Serbia; this narrative has hitherto remained largely unchallenged. Whilst history did weigh heavily on Mitterrand’s perceptions of the conflicts in Yugoslavia, this thesis argues that France’s Yugoslav policy was more the logical outcome of longer-term trends in French and Mitterrandienne foreign policy. Furthermore, it reflected a determined effort by France to ensure that its long-established preferences for post-Cold War security were at the forefront of European and international politics; its strong position in all significant international multilateral institutions provided an important platform to do so. -
YUGOSLAV-SOVIET RELATIONS, 1953- 1957: Normalization, Comradeship, Confrontation
YUGOSLAV-SOVIET RELATIONS, 1953- 1957: Normalization, Comradeship, Confrontation Svetozar Rajak Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science University of London February 2004 UMI Number: U615474 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615474 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ” OF POUTICAL «, AN0 pi Th ^ s^ s £ £2^>3 ^7&2io 2 ABSTRACT The thesis chronologically presents the slow improvement of relations between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, starting with Stalin’s death on 5 March 1953, through their full normalization in 1955 and 1956, to the renewed ideological confrontation at the end of 1956. The normalization of Yugoslav-Soviet relations brought to an end a conflict between Yugoslavia and the Eastern Bloc, in existence since 1948, which threatened the status quo in Europe. The thesis represents the first effort at comprehensively presenting the reconciliation between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, between 1953 and 1957. It will also explain the motives that guided the leaderships of the two countries, in particular the two main protagonists, Josip Broz Tito and Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev, throughout this process. -
Yugoslav Destruction After the Cold War
STASIS AMONG POWERS: YUGOSLAV DESTRUCTION AFTER THE COLD WAR A dissertation presented by Mladen Stevan Mrdalj to The Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Political Science Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts December 2015 STASIS AMONG POWERS: YUGOSLAV DESTRUCTION AFTER THE COLD WAR by Mladen Stevan Mrdalj ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University December 2015 2 Abstract This research investigates the causes of Yugoslavia’s violent destruction in the 1990’s. It builds its argument on the interaction of international and domestic factors. In doing so, it details the origins of Yugoslav ideology as a fluid concept rooted in the early 19th century Croatian national movement. Tracing the evolving nationalist competition among Serbs and Croats, it demonstrates inherent contradictions of the Yugoslav project. These contradictions resulted in ethnic outbidding among Croatian nationalists and communists against the perceived Serbian hegemony. This dynamic drove the gradual erosion of Yugoslav state capacity during Cold War. The end of Cold War coincided with the height of internal Yugoslav conflict. Managing the collapse of Soviet Union and communism imposed both strategic and normative imperatives on the Western allies. These imperatives largely determined external policy toward Yugoslavia. They incentivized and inhibited domestic actors in pursuit of their goals. The result was the collapse of the country with varying degrees of violence. The findings support further research on international causes of civil wars. -
CROSSROADS / April 2007
CROSSROADS THE MACEDONIAN FOREIGN POLICY JOURNAL April 2007 Vol. I, No.2 April 2007 QUO VADIS EUROPA? OU VA L’EUROPE Michel ROCARD explique pourquoi L’Europe d’aujourd’hui est bien différente de ce que ses fondateurs ont voulu L’Unione Europea: unità politica o declino? di Achille ALBONETTI European Constitution / European Politics Reviving the Constitutional Treaty by Andrew DUFF Elmar BROK on Common Foreign and Security Policy Jerzy BUZEK on the problem of energy solidarity in the enlarged Europe Creation of Europe / Reflections Alan DUKES, Géza JESZENSZKY, Eduard KUKAN, Petra MašínoVÁ EU Enlargement THE MACEDONIAN FOREIGN POLICY JOURNAL The EU keeps its door open to South-East Europe by Olli REHN Dimitrij RUPEL on Slovenian reflections on further enlargement Interview Javier Solana EU Candidates Stjepan Mesić on Croatian path to the EU Gabriela KONEVSKA TRAJKOVSKA on Macedonia in the EU Macedonia’s economic challenges on the road towards the EU by Abdylmenaf BEXHETI & Luan ESHTREFI CROSSROADS UDC: 327 (497.7) ISSN 1857-5404 327 Vol. I, No. 2 CROSSROADS CROSSROADS THE MACEDONIAN FOREIGN POLICY JOURNAL THE MACEDONIAN FOREIGN POLICY JOURNAL April 2007, Vol. I, No.2 April 2007, Vol. I, No.2 Editor-in-Chief Pajo AVIROVIK Deputy Editor Ivica BOCEVSKI Editorial Board: Vasko NAUMOVSKI, LLM, MA Darko ANGELOV, MA Maciej KacZoroWski Ljuben TEVDOVSKI Igor POPOVSKI Contributors: Vasile ANDONOVSKI Toni GLAMCEVSKI Eli BOJADZIESKA RISTOVSKI Edvard MItevsKI Founded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia. Dame Gruev 6, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia www.mfa.gov.mk Published by: Macedonian Information Centre (MIC) Dragan ANTONOV, Director N.N. -
Breakup of Yugoslavia
ODUMUNC 2019 Issue Brief Crisis Simulation: Death of Nation: Breakup of Yugoslavia Jackson Harris ODU United Nations Society, and the ODU Graduate Program in International Studies Introduction explanation of the Crisis that the committee will be tackling, as well as a background of the Welcome to the Office of the Presidency of characters that delegates will be playing. This Socialist Federal Republic (SFR) of Yugoslavia guide is not meant to provide a complete Crisis Committee! In order to allow delegates to understanding of the history leading up to the familiarize themselves with the rules and committee, rather to provide a platform that will procedures of the committee, as well as research, be supplemented by personal research. While all intricacies involved in the committee will be there are a number of available online sources discussed in this outline. The following sections the Crisis Director has provided the information of this issue brief will contain a topical overview for a group of helpful links to use at the of the relevant history of Yugoslavia, an delegate’s discretion. Yugslavia, 1919-1991 Death of Nation: Breakup of Yugoslavia Rules and Procedures Some delegates may have participated in crisis with their character and committee. Instead of committees before and the rules for this sending individual notes, the delegate will write committee will remain largely the same as a their crisis notes on the legal pad and send the typical crisis. The ODUMUNC rules and entire pad to Crisis when note collection occurs. procedures can be found at the following link: The Crisis staff will reply on the same notepad https://www.odu.edu/content/dam/odu/offices/m to whatever is written on it at the time of un/odumunc-delegate-guide-winning-un- receival. -
04 Tabele.Qxd
Evidencija osoba koje su obnaale vodeæe partijske i dravne dunosti na razlièitim razinama u posljednjih trideset godina Socijalistièka ederativna Republika Jugoslavija / Savezna Republika Jugoslavija: Predsjednici Predsjednitva S RJ Ime i prezime stranka od do Lazar Kolievski SKJ-Makedonija 04.05.1980. 15.05.1980. Cvijetin Mijatoviæ SKJ-Crna Gora 15.05.1980. 15.05.1981. Sergej Kraigher SKJ-Slovenija 15.05.1981. 15.05.1982. Petar Stamboliæ SKJ-Srbija 15.05.1982. 15.05.1983. Mika piljak SKJ-Hrvatska 15.05.1983. 15.05.1984. Veselin Ðuranoviæ SKJ-Crna Gora 15.05.1984. 15.05.1985. Radovan Vlajkoviæ SKJ-Vojvodina 15.05.1985. 15.05.1986. Sinan Hasani SKJ-Kosovo 15.05.1986. 15.05.1987. Lazar Mojsov SKJ-Makedonija 15.05.1987. 15.05.1988. Raif Dizdareviæ SKJ-BiH 15.05.1988. 15.05.1989. Janez Drnovek SKJ-Slovenija 15.05.1989. 15.05.1990. Borisav Joviæ SKJ-Srbija-SPS 15.05.1990. 15.05.1991. Stjepan Mesiæ HDZ 01.07.1991. 08.10.1991. Branko Kostiæ v.d. DPS-Crna Gora 08.10.1991. 15.06.1992. Predsjednici Savezne Republike Jugoslavije Ime i prezime stranka od do Dobrica Æosiæ - 15.06.1992. 01.06.1993. Milo Raduloviæ v.d. DPS 01.06.1993. 25.06.1993. Zoran Liliæ SPS 25.06.1993. 15.07.1997. Srða Booviæ v.d. DPS 15.07.1997. 23.07.1997. Slobodan Miloeviæ SPS 15.07.1997. 06.10.2000. Vojislav Kotunica DSS / DOS 06.10.2000. 07.03.2003. Svetozar Maroviæ DPS 07.03.2003. 187 Predsjednici predsjednitva Centralnog komiteta Saveza komunista Jugoslavije Ime i prezime od do Josip Broz Tito 13.08.1964. -
Yugoslavian Civil War
EthicalMUN III Yugoslavian Civil War Chairs: Noah Greer and Olivia Pollack Crisis Directors: Sarah Kaiser and Theodore Canning EthicalMUNEthicalMUN IIIII Hello Delegates, We are delighted to welcome you to Ethical MUN II and we are looking Theo Dassin forward to two full and exciting days of debate. Co-Secretary General The topic for this committee is Yugoslavia and we are really looking forward to seeing your unique solutions. We hope that this topic will stimulate your creativity and make Iva Knezevic for an amazing weekend. We have four experienced chairs and crisis directors who are Co-Secretary General eagerly anticipating the conference. Please take time to thoroughly read the background guide and conduct research of your own so that you can have the best CormacAlex Keswani Thorpe position papers possible. This background guide is simply a starting point for your Co-SecretaryChief of Staff General research, and much more research is necessary to prepare for this committee. For those of you who are new to Model UN, this committee is a crisis committee which JulieJacob Johnson Greene means that there will constantly be new problems (provided by our lovely crisis Chief of Staff directors Sarah and Noah) that you must solve. This committee will be starting in 1992. Anything before this is set in stone, Ryan Kelly but anything after is all up to you. Emphasis will be placed on not copying exactly OliviaVice-Secretary Becker of what occurred in real life, as we want you to come up with interesting and creative ChiefCommittees of Staff solutions on your own. -
CRISIS in CROATIA Part III: the Road to Karadjordjevo by Dennison I
SOUTHEAST EUROPE SERIES Vol. XIX No. 6 (Yugoslavia) CRISIS IN CROATIA Part III: The Road to Karadjordjevo by Dennison I. Rusinow September 1972 In November 1971, only a few weeks before the circulation of over 100,000 only six months after fateful meeting at Karadjordjevo, an old friend starting publication, but my friend was not (to my from Zagreb accosted me in a Belgrade hotel. knowledge) a Matica man. He was always, however, well informed. Divisions within the Croatian "You live here," he said, "so tell me: What in leadership were apparently reaching a point of cli- God's name do these stupid Serbs really think is max at which someone, sooner or later, would have going on in Croatia?" to go. On all the evidence then available, it seemed certain that this would mean those to whom the I replied with cautious understatement that there damning label "unitarist" could be made to stick. was a widespread feeling that the Croatian Party, in its pursuit of democracy and mass support on a na- Hrvatski Tjednik and the Zagreb student press tional platform, had encouraged a national eupho- had in recent months begun naming names, in- ria and tolerated nationalist activities and "ex- cluding some members of the Croatian Party's cesses" that many non-Croats, conscious of recent Executive Committee, the President of the Cro- history and the hypersensitivity of the national atian Parliament (Jakov Blaevid), andsome- question in Yugoslavia, found alarming. what more cautiouslyBakarid himself. The definition of a "unitarist" had also undergone "Are they really so badly informed?" my friend some refinement" it connoted even more clearly a asked desperately. -
Hrvatska U Socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji 1945. – 1991
Dušan bilandžić Tvrtko Jakovina Filozofski fakultet sveučilišta u Zagrebu hrvatska u soCiJaListiČkoJ JugosLaviJi 1945. – 1991. Autori u tekstu promatraju hrvatsku povijest druge polovine 20. stoljeća, točnije, od 1945. i stvaranja prve Narodne vlade Hrvatske u Splitu do početka 1992. godine i međunarodnog priznanja Hrvatske od velikog broja zemalja Europe. Pritom se u kronološkoj matrici preispituju ključni procesi razdoblja u kojemu je Hrvatska bila dio jugoslavenske federacije, od unutrašnjih do vanjskopolitičkih hladnoratovskih faktora. Ključne riječi: Hrvatska, Jugoslavija, Hladni rat, Josip Broz Tito, Komunistička partija, društvo 1. Hrvatska nakon 1945: nova vlast, nove granice, novi stanovnici d stvaranja prve Narodne vlade Hrvatske u Splitu 14. travnja 1945. pa do (najkasnije) O15. sijeènja 1992. i meðunarodnog priznanja Republike Hrvatske od velikog broja najvažnijih država Europe, Hrvatska je bila dijelom jugoslavenske federacije. Psihološki, a u mnogoèemu i de facto, unatoè djelomiènoj okupaciji, djelomiènom funkcioniranju saveznih ustanova i činjenici da je zemlju tijekom 1991. priznalo tek nekoliko država svije ta, Hrvatska je bila samostalna zapravo od trenutka kada je Sabor proglasio neovisnost 25. lipnja 1991., a posebno nakon isteka tromjeseènog moratorija na tu odluku, koji je prihvaæen na inzistiranje meðunarodne zajednice, a istekao je 8. listopada 1991. godine. Sve do tada, punih 45 godina, Hrvatska je bila druga po velièini republika socijalistièke, Titove, republikanske ili, prema odlukama iz Jajca 1943., avnojske Jugoslavije. Od posljednjih mjeseci Drugog svjetskog rata pa do prvih izbora za Ustavotvornu skupštinu Hrvatska se, kao i ostale republike, oznaèavala prefiksom federalna i bila je dijelom Demokratske Federativne Jugoslavije (DFJ). Od preimenovanja države u Fede- rativnu Narodnu Republiku Jugoslaviju 29. studenoga 1945. do 1963. -
Yugoslavia's Implosion
SONJA BISERKO “Serbs cannot live peacefully in a state where non-Serbs form the majority. Serbia can never live peacefully with her hostile neighboring BISERKO SONJA states. We will never join the European Un- ion. We will never acknowledge Srebrenica as a Yugoslavia’s crime. We will never give up Kosovo and Meto- hija.” There has been, and still is, a lot of “nevers” in Serbian political discourse. However, by the YUGOSLAVIA’S IMPLOSION YUGOSLAVIA’S end of 2012 the country is on the path to Implosion The Fatal Attraction EU-membership. Politicians from nearly all quar- of Serbian Nationalism ters claim to have the best strategic approach to EU-membership, despite having to deal with demands that would not long ago have been laughed at as utterly unrealistic. What happened to the aggressive nationalism that not long ago would have crushed all at- tempts to challenge such “nevers”? The Norwegian Helsinki Committee has worked in Serbia since the early nineties; monitoring and reporting on the human right situation, following the political devel- opment and supporting human right defenders. We have chosen to publish this book written by Sonja Biserko, President of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, in an attempt to direct attention to exactly how indispensable human rights activists are right now, and how vitally important they are for the time to come. For two decades, Biserko has persistently and courageously protested against war, nationalism and human rights abuse. Her analysis represents a perspective on Ser- bian politics that is very much needed among the optimism of all the problems that can seemingly be solved by an EU-membership. -
Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia1
UDK: 323.233(497.11)“1968“ https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P Original Scientific Article PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY Received: 30.08.2018. Accepted: 21.10.2018. VOL. 30, NO. 1, 001-196 Aleksandar Pavlović Mark Losoncz BELGRADE 1968 PROTESTS AND THE POST-EVENTAL FIDELITY: INTELLECTUAL AND POLITICAL LEGACY OF THE 1968 STUDENT PROTESTS IN SERBIA1 ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Even though Belgrade student protests emerged and ended abruptly 1968 Belgrade student after only seven days in June of 1968, they came as a cumulative point protests, Case of eight of a decade-long accumulated social dissatisfaction and antagonisms, as professors, Belgrade well as of philosophical investigations of the unorthodox Marxists of the Faculty of Philosophy, Praxis, Korčula Summer Praxis school (Praksisovci). It surprised the Yugoslav authorities as the School, Institute for first massive rebellion after WWII to explicitly criticize rising social Philosophy and Social inequality, bureaucratization and unemployment and demand free speech Theory, Josip Broz Tito, and abolishment of privileges. This article focuses on the intellectual Socialist Federal destiny and legacy of the eight professors from the Faculty of Philosophy Republic of Yugoslavia. close to the Praxis school, who were identified as the protests’ instigators and subsequently expelled from the University of Belgrade due to their “ethico-political unsuitability”. Under both international and domestic pressure, they were later reemployed in a separate research unit named the Centre for Philosophy and Social Theory, where they kept their critical edge and argued for political pluralism. From the late 1980s onwards, they and their colleagues became politically active and at times occupied the highest positions in Serbia – Dragoljub Mićunović as one of the founders of the modern Democratic Party and the Speaker of the Parliament, former Serbian President and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and former Prime Minister late Zoran Đinđić. -
CRISIS in CROATIA Part II: Facilis Decensus Averno
SOUTHEAST EUROPE SERIES Vol. XIX No. 5 (Yugoslavia) CRISIS IN CROATIA Part II: Facilis Decensus Averno by Dennison I. Rusinow September 1972 They came to power on a platform of "Decentrali- If both descriptions are true, this is the stuff of zation, De-6tatization, De-politicization, and De- which Greek tragedy (also a Balkan invention?) is mocratization. ''1 They were hailed as paladins of made. It is the purpose of this series of Reports to "liberal" communism and a pluralistic concept of argue that both are in fact true, at least in grosso socialist society. They were regarded, correctly, as the modo, and to trace the path that leads from the first pupils, creatures, and heirs of Vladimir Bakari6, the to the second. man who had played the key role in bringing about the overthrow in 1966 of Aleksandar Rankovi6 and Miko Tripalo was born in 1926 in Sinj, a small his security police, the symbols and guarantors of town in the barren Dalmatian hinterland. He joined "neo-Stalinist centralism, bureaucratism, and the Communist-led Partisan resistance movement greater-Serbian hegemonism" and the men whose when it began in 1941, at age 15, and he entered the political destruction had opened the gates to the Party in 1943, when he was 17. Politics have been his realization of that "socialist democracy" which career ever since: a Communist youth leader after the found its most articulate political spokesmen in war and President of the Federation of Yugoslav stu- Bakari6 and his pupils. They were young, born dents from 1953 to 1955: a member of the Central between 1923 and 1929, and therefore also symbols Committee of the all-Yugoslav Party in 1958; a of the new generation of educated, "modern" Com- member of the Executive Committee of the Croatian munists who were supposed to be consistent fighters Party from 1962 and its Secretary from 1966 to 1969.