DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Assembly of Manitoba

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Assembly of Manitoba ISSN 0542-5492 Second Session - Thirty-Second Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba STANDING COMMITTEE on PRIVILEGES and ELECTIONS 31-32 Elizabeth 11 Chairman Mr. Phi/ Eyler Constituency of River East VOL. XXXI No. 63 - 2:00 p.m., SATURDAY, 28 JANUARY, 1984. Printed by the Office of the 0.-ns Printer. Province of Allltliloba . MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thirty-Second Legislature Members, Constituencies and Political Affiliation Name Constituency Party ADAM,Hon. A.R. (Pete) Ste. Rose NDP ANSTET� Hon. Andy Spnngfield NDP ASHTON, Steve Thompson NDP BANMAN,Robert (Bob) La Verendrye PC BLAKE,David R. (Dave) Minnedosa PC BROWN, Arnold Rhineland PC BUCKLASCHUK,Hon. John M. Gimli NDP CARROLL, Q.C., Henry N. Brandon West IND CORRIN, Q.C., Brian Ellice NDP COWAN, Hon. Jay Churchill NDP DESJARDINS, Hon. Laurent St. Boniface NDP DODICK,Doreen Riel NDP DOERN, Russell Elm wood NDP DOLIN, Hon. Mary Beth Kildonan NDP DOWNEY, James E. Arthur PC DRIEDGER, Albert Emerson PC ENNS, Harry Lakeside PC EVANS,Hon. Leonard S. Brandon East NDP EYLER,Phil River East NDP FILMON, Gary Tu xedo PC FOX, Peter Concordia NDP GOURLAY, D.M. (Doug) Swan River PC GRAHAM, Harry Virden PC HAMMOND, Gerrie Kirkfield Park PC HARAPIAK, Harry M. The Pas NDP HARPER, Elijah Rupertsland NDP HEMPHILL,Hon. Maureen Logan NDP HYDE, Lloyd Portage la Prairie PC JOHNSTON,J. Frank Sturgeon Creek PC KOSTYRA,Hon. Eugene Seven Oaks NDP KOVNATS, Abe Niakwa PC LECUYER,Hon. Gerard Radisson NDP LY ON, Q.C., Hon. Sterling Charleswood PC MACKLING, Q.C., Hon. AI St. James NDP MALINOWSKI,Donald M. St. Johns NDP MANNESS,Clayton Morris PC McKENZIE, J. Wally Roblin-Russell PC MERCIER, Q.C., G.W.J. (Gerry) St. Norbert PC NORDMAN, Rurik (Ric) Assiniboia PC OLESON,Charlotte Gladstone PC ORCHARD, Donald Pembina PC PAWLEY, Q.C., Hon. Howard R. Selkirk NDP PARASIUK, Hon. Wilson Tr anscona NDP PENNER, Q.C., Hon. Roland Fort Rouge NDP PHILLIPS, Myrna A. Wolseley NDP PLOHMAN, Hon. John Dauphin NDP RANSOM, A. Brian Tu rtle Mountain PC SANTOS,Conrad Burrows NDP SCHROEDER,Hon. Vie Rossmere NDP SCOTT, Don lnkster NDP SHERMAN, L.R. (Bud) Fort Garry PC SMITH,Hon. Muriel Os borne NDP STEEN,Wa rren River Heights PC STORIE,Hon. Jerry T. Flin Flon NDP URUSKI, Hon. Bill lnterlake NDP USKIW, Hon. Samuel Lac du Bonnet NDP WA LDING,Hon. D. James St. Vital NDP LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PRIVILEGES & ELECTIONS Saturday, 28 January, 1984 TIME - 2:00 p.m. being done by the Government of the Day under the guise and the mistaken notion that they know best, LOCATION - Winnipeg, Manitoba and the lastest incredible line, because "we don't understand." Gentlemen, let me assure you, I, for one, CHAIRMAN - Mr. Phil Eyler (River East) understand only too well. lt is not as if this government doesn't know the wishes of the majority of the people, ATTENDANCE - QUORUM - 6 because that has been made abundantly clear and it's Members of the Committee present: been clear that those wishes oppose the actions of the government. Hon. Messrs. Anstett, Bucklaschuk, Lecuyer The government's actions do not represent and Mackling democracy as I fought for it. lt seems that travesty of Messrs. Eyler, Scott, Enns, Filmon, Kovnats, justice to me that the "D" in NDP stands for democratic. Harapiak, Nordman What a misplacement of a word. lt is not democratic for politicians to completely ignore the wishes of the WITNESSES: Mr. R.W. Wootton, Private Citizen people that they are supposed to be serving. That is Ms. Gaye Selby, Private Citizen not democracy, that is dictatorship and it is not Mr. Alan Beachell, Reeve, R.M. of Rosser acceptable. The opposition to the government's actions is broad Mr. Helmut Albrecht, Private Citizen and quite obviously crosses all party lines. There is a Professor A.R. Kear, Private Citizen Manitoban - in the broader sense - a Manitoban Mr. Albert Krawchuk, Private Citizen objection to the government's clumsy dictatorial Mrs. Lois Edie, Private Citizen, handling of this whole matter. lt is not a political party Mr. Arthur Doering, Private Citizen ground swell. lt is a reaction of a whole cross-section of the people to offensive government action. The Mr. Ta ras Lasko, Private Citizen closure action strikes at the very root of what we believe Mr. E.W. Hilger, Private Citizen in in Canada as being the process of governing. This Mr. J. Hay, Private Citizen, government is by force opposing the will of the people. Reeve John Loewen, R.M. of Hanover Now if you are so certain of your rightness, then call an election and take the question to the people. The MATTERS UNDER DISCUSSION: answer is out there. Bill No. 115 - An Act respecting the Operation I'd like to spend just a few moments, having made of Section 23 of The Manitoba Act; Loi that point, talking about the issue at hand, Bill 115. I concernant la mise en application de I'article 23 must note first that there is a great sadness within me de la Loi de 1870 sur le Manitoba. at the division effect of this bill and everything that attaches to it. I must refer you to a very close example that surely mustn't and cannot, if you're practical and with a reasonably open mind, ignore. Let's look at the United States of America, a total melting pot of ethnic backgrounds, of people from MR. CHAIRMAN: Committee will come to order. The virtually every country in the world. What do you see? next person on my list to call is Reeve William Roth; Tremendous pride of country, tremendous pride of flag, Mr. Roy Benson; Mr. Eugene Kinaschuk; Mr. Alexander tremendous spirit. Look at any American event when Pressey. they play their national anthem, and compare it with Mr. R.W. Wootton. what we have here. What do we have here? Nothing that compares to the spirit and the drive and the MR. R. WOOTTON: Mr. Chairman, members of the motivation that the American spirit provides to its committee. I'd like first to offer my thanks for the people. I trust that this government will somehow feel opportunity to present my comments to you. I would the sense of guilt that they should for the damage they like also to make clear that I do not appear here as have done. a redneck. I noted carefully the gratuitous insult that Now I have nothing against French or the French­ I received yesterday from Mr. Mackling, and I think, Canadians per se, but I do object and I object most given its source, I will merely confine my comments to strenuously to anything which, in its application, does expressing sympathy to such a small remark. not have a proper relationship between its cost and I'd like to make the point first that, as a basis to my its benefit or return. Our world turns on the principles comments, Sir, I spent five years during the Second of economics. We are not dealing with this matter in Wo rld War fighting an ideology which was intent on realities. forcing its will on others, regardless of their wishes. - Let me make a point, first of all. I am a member of (Interjection) - I'd like to use my words if you don't a small minority, and maybe you're trampling my rights. mind. Thus I cannot passively accept the same thing Do you know what I feel about the fact that you are 1396 Saturday, 28 January, 1984 not doing anything about it? Great! Butt out! I don't officers are going to have to be doing that throughout need you, and the reason is that it would make no Manitoba, to determine what was taught in childhood economic sense for you to deal with the emotional of the two languages. matter that I might raise representing trampled rights. In the comparison of their impact on the country at A MEMBER: Harry! large, it's meaningless. The cost of correcting these rights that I feel you might be trampling has no economic MR. H. ENNS: No, that's a fair question. merit - ridiculous. Now I want to use that as an entree to the point that MR. R. WOOTTON: I'm perfectly prepared to answer I don't know what it is that we are trying to deal with. the question, Mr. Chairman. I find it rather amusing We're not dealing with hard facts in terms that are because you must be referring to the accent that I lost recognizable. We are dealing with intangibles, and years ago. intangibles whose value in application or non­ application never sees the light of day. it's an emotional MR. H. ENNS: it's not quite lost. subject as far as I can see. Who is suffering from what? What rights are they being denied? What is the impact MR. R. WOOTTON: In order to answer your question of that denial? What is the cost of that denial to those I have to go back a little bit in history. I am not a native­ people? If it has any merit, what is the cost of correcting born Canadian. I'm from Australia. I came to this country it? How do the two values compare? What is the net? during the Second World War in the British That's the way you run a business, gentlemen. That's Commonwealth Air Training Plan as a pilot in the Royal the way we run this country. When do we get to deal Australian Air Force and I completed my pilot training with this subject in those kinds of basic economic, here, was an instructor for a period of time and then practical terms? We haven't even approached it up to went overseas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In
    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: [email protected] 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • HT-EM Logos Stacked(4C)
    EXCLUSIVE POLITICAL COCOVERAGE:OVVEERARAGGE: NNEWS,REMEMBERING FEATURES, AND ANALYSISLYSISS INSIDEINNSSIDIDE ACCESS TO HILL TRANSPORTATION POLICY BRIEFING PP. 19-33 JEAN LAPIERRE P. 10 INFORMATION P. 14 CLIMBERS P.41 TWENTY-SEVENTH YEAR, NO. 1328 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2016 $5.00 NEWS SYRIAN REFUGEES NEWS NDP ‘Very, very Wernick planning to stick NDP policy few’ Syrian convention refugees came around PCO for a while, ‘one for the to Canada push on for ‘nimbleness and ages,’ many from refugee eager to vote camps: CBSA offi cial Bolduc agility’ in public service on Mulcair’s leadership BY ABBAS RANA “Very, very few” of the BY LAURA RYCKEWAERT thousands of Syrian refugees Privy Council who have come to Canada came Clerk Michael More than 1,500 NDP members from refugee camps and most had Wernick says will attend the party’s policy con- been living in rented apartments his current vention in Edmonton this week to in Syria’s neighbouring countries, priorities include help shape the NDP’s future. a senior CBSA offi cial told creating a public Many are eager to see a review Parliament in February. service that has vote on NDP Leader Tom Mulcair’s Conservatives are now accusing ‘nimbleness leadership and there’s much talk the federal government of convey- and agility’ so about the direction of the party and ing a false perception to Canadians it can meet its “soul,” after its crushing defeat that refugees were selected from the needs of a in the last federal election. refugee camps. But the government ‘busy, ambitious NDP analyst Ian Capstick says it has never said all Syrian government that said the event will be “one for the wants to do a lot ages.” Continued on page 35 in it’s mandate, but I think this Continued on page 34 would be true had we been NEWS SENATE dealing with a blue government NEWS PUBLIC SERVICE or an orange Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario: the Centre of Confederation?
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2018-10 Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999 University of Calgary Press Heidt, D. (Ed.). (2018). "Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999". Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108896 book https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca RECONSIDERING CONFEDERATION: Canada’s Founding Debates, 1864–1999 Edited by Daniel Heidt ISBN 978-1-77385-016-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. Serge Joyal, P.C., O.C., O.Q., FRSC
    Bio - Heritage Ottawa WWI talk_Feb 28 2018 The Hon. Serge Joyal, P.C., O.C., O.Q., FRSC The Honourable Serge Joyal is a lawyer, jurist and Senator in the Parliament of Canada since 1997. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree (1964) and a Law Degree (1968) from the Université de Montréal. He also earned a Master’s Degree in Administrative Law from the University of Sheffield (1970), he registered for the Master’s program in Constitutional Law at the London School of Economics (1971), and received a Postgraduate Diploma in Comparative Law from the University of Strasbourg (1972). His interests and specialisation are in legal affairs, including constitutional and parliamentary law. His political career began in 1974 when he was elected to the House of Commons. During his decade in the Commons, he was Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury Board President (1980), Minister of State (1981), and Secretary of State (1982-1984). He was instrumental in establishing the Standing Joint Committee on Official Languages (1980) and served as Co-President of the Joint Committee on the Patriation of the Canadian Constitution (1980-81), charged with the task of studying the resolution that became the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Following his appointment to the Senate in (1997), Mr. Joyal has been a long-serving active member on various committees including the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee, as well as of the Rules, Procedures and the Rights of Parliament Committee. In addition, he is currently the Vice-Chair of the Conflict of Interest Committee, of which he was Chair for 7 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, May 2, 2000
    CANADA 2nd SESSION • 36th PARLIAMENT • VOLUME 138 • NUMBER 50 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, May 2, 2000 THE HONOURABLE ROSE-MARIE LOSIER-COOL SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE This issue contains the latest listing of Senators, Officers of the Senate, the Ministry, and Senators serving on Standing, Special and Joint Committees. CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates and Publications: Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 996-0193 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1170 THE SENATE Tuesday, May 2, 2000 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Speaker pro tempore in the Last week, Richard Donahoe joined this political pantheon and Chair. there he belongs, now part of the proud political history and tradition of Nova Scotia. He was a greatly gifted and greatly respected public man. He was much beloved, especially by the Prayers. rank and file of the Progressive Conservative Party. Personally, and from my earliest days as a political partisan, I recall his kindness, thoughtfulness and encouragement to me and to others. THE LATE HONOURABLE Dick was an inspiration to several generations of young RICHARD A. DONAHOE, Q.C. Progressive Conservatives in Nova Scotia. • (1410) TRIBUTES The funeral service was, as they say nowadays, quite “upbeat.” Hon. Lowell Murray: Honourable senators, I have the sad It was the mass of the resurrection, the Easter service, really, with duty to record the death, on Tuesday, April 25, of our former great music, including a Celtic harp and the choir from Senator colleague the Honourable Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Passage Du Canada Français À La Francophonie Mondiale : Mutations Nationales, Démocratisation Et Altruisme Au Mouvement Richelieu, 1944 – 1995
    Le passage du Canada français à la Francophonie mondiale : mutations nationales, démocratisation et altruisme au mouvement Richelieu, 1944 – 1995 par Serge Dupuis A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Serge Dupuis 2013 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. Je déclare par la présente que je suis le seul auteur de cette thèse. Il s’agit d’une copie réelle de la thèse, y compris toute révision finale requise, telle qu’acceptée par les examinateurs. Je comprends que ma thèse pourrait être rendue disponible électroniquement au public. Serge Dupuis 30 August 2013 ii Abstract / Résumé This thesis argues that French Canada did not simply fragment into regional and provincial identities during the 1960s and 1970s, but was also kept afloat by the simultaneous emergence of a francophone supranational reference. In order to demonstrate this argument, I have studied the archives of the Richelieu movement, a French Canadian society founded in 1944 in Ottawa, which was internationalized in the hopes of developing relationships amongst the francophone elite around the world. This thesis also considers the process of democratization and the evolution of conceptions of altruism within the movement, signalling again the degree to which the global project of the Francophonie captivated the spirits of Francophones in North America, but also in Europe, the Caribbean and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Du Canada», Publie Par by the Government on October 2, 1980 Le Gouvernement Le 2 Octobre 1980
    SENATE SENAT HOUSE OF COMMONS CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES Issue No. 38 Fascicule n" 38 Thursday, January 15, 1981 Le jeudi 15 janvier 1981 Joint Chairmen: Copn!sidents: Senator Harry Hays, P.C. Senateur Harry Hays, c.p. Serge Joyal, M.P. Serge J oyal, depute Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence Proces-verbaux et temoignages of the Special Joint Committee of du Comite mixte special the Senate and of du Senat et de the House of Commons on the la Chambre des communes sur la Constitution Constitution of Canada du Canada RESPECTING: CONCERN ANT: The document entitled "Proposed Resolution for a Le document intitule «Projet de resolution portant Joint Address to Her Majesty the Queen adresse commune a Sa Majeste la Reine respecting the Constitution of Canada" published concernant la Constitution du Canada», publie par by the Government on October 2, 1980 le gouvernement le 2 octobre 1980 APPEARING: COMPARAIT: The Honourable Jean Chretien, L'honorable Jean Chretien, Minister of Justice and ministre de la Justice et Attorney General of Canada procureur general du Canada WITNESSES: TEMOINS: (See back cover) (Voir a l'endos) I First Session of the Premiere session de la Thirty-second Parliament, 1980-81 trente-deuxieme legislature, 1980-1981 29038-l SPECIAL JOINT COMMITTEE OF COMITE MIXTE SPECIAL DU SENAT THE SENATE AND OF THE HOUSE ET DE LA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES OF COMMONS ON THE CONSTITUTION SUR LA CONSTITUTION DU CANADA OF CANADA Joint Chairmen: Copresidents: Senator Harry Hays, P.C. Senateur Harry Hays, c.p. Serge Joyal, M.P. Serge Joyal, depute Representing the Senate: Representant le Senat: Senators: Les senateurs: Austin Lapointe Murray Rousseau Belisle Lucier Petten Tremblay-1 0 Connolly Representing the House of Commons: Representant la Chambre des communes: Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberties, Claims and a Very Canadian Conversation
    LANGUAGE RIGHTS: LIBERTIES, CLAIMS AND A VERY CANADIAN CONVERSATION Graham Fraser Language rights are not only central to the cultural identity of Canada’s two founding language communities, they are central to both Canada’s constitutional traditions, with group freedoms and denominational schools initially guaranteed under the British North America Act, and individual rights entrenched in the Charter. “In considering the Charter,” writes Canada’s new Commissioner of Official Languages, “it is easy to think that rights and freedoms are almost synonyms. They aren’t.” Graham Fraser considers the BNA Act versus Charter status of language rights, and recounts the modern context, from the B&B Commission of the 1960s, to the Official Languages Act of 1969, to the entrenchment of minority language rights in the Charter. Les droits linguistiques sont aussi indissociables de l’identité culturelle des deux communautés fondatrices du pays que de nos deux traditions constitutionnelles. En témoignent la garantie des libertés collectives et des écoles confessionnelles inscrite dès l’origine dans l’Acte de l’Amérique du Nord britannique, puis celle des droits individuels intégrée à la Charte des droits et libertés. En vertu de celle-ci, écrit le nouveau commissaire aux langues officielles Graham Fraser, on peut d’ailleurs « imaginer que droits et libertés sont quasi synonymes, mais il n’en est rien ». L’auteur examine les statuts respectifs de l’Acte de l’Amérique du Nord britannique et de la Charte des droits et libertés à la lumière de l’histoire récente, depuis la Commission royale sur le bilinguisme et le biculturalisme des années 1960 jusqu’à la Loi sur les langues officielles de 1969 en passant par l’inscription dans la Charte des droits linguistiques des minorités linguistiques.
    [Show full text]
  • C-6 CANADA YEAR BOOK the Hon. Hedard Robichaud, April 22, 1963
    C-6 CANADA YEAR BOOK The Hon. Hedard Robichaud, April 22, 1963 The Hon. Leonard Stephen Marchand, The Hon. Roger Teillet, April 22, 1963 September 15, 1976 The Hon. Charies Mills Drury, April 22, 1963 The Hon. John Roberts, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Maurice Sauve, February 3, 1964 The Hon. Monique Begin, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Yvon Dupuis, February 3, 1964 The Hon. Jean-Jacques Blais, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Edgar John Benson, June 29, 1964 The Hon. Francis Fox, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Leo Alphonse Joseph Cadieux, The Hon. Anthony Chisholm Abbott, February 15, 1965 September 15, 1976 The Hon. Lawrence T. Pennell, July 7, 1965 The Hon. lona Campagnolo, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Jean-Luc Pepin, July 7, 1965 The Hon. Joseph-Philippe Guay, November 3, 1976 The Hon. Alan Aylesworth Macnaughton, The Hon. John Henry Horner, April 21, 1977 October 25, 1965 The Hon. Norman A. Cafik, September 16, 1977 The Hon. Jean Marchand, December 18, 1965 The Hon. J. Gilles Lamontagne, January 19, 1978 The Hon. Joseph Julien Jean-Pierre Cote, The Hon. John M. Reid, November 24, 1978 December 18, 1965 The Hon. Pierre De Bane, November 24, 1978 TheRt. Hon. John Napier Turner, December 18, 1965 The Rt. Hon. Charles Joseph (Joe) Clark, June 4, 1979 The Rt. Hon. Pierre Elliott Trudeau, April 4, 1967 The Hon. Flora Isabel MacDonald, June 4, 1979 The Hon. Joseph-Jacques-Jean Chretien, April 4, 1967 The Hon. James A. McGrath, June 4, 1979 The Hon. Pauline Vanier, April II, 1967 The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Canadian Bicameralism: Past, Present and Future
    1 Understanding Canadian Bicameralism: Past, Present and Future Presented at the 2018 Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association Gary William O’Brien, Ph.D. June, 2018 Not be cited until a final version is uploaded 2 Studies of the Senate of Canada’s institutional design as well as the proposals for its reform have often focused on the method of selection, distribution of seats and powers.1 Another methodology is the use of classification models of bicameral second chambers which also explore power and representation dimensions but in a broader constitutional and political context. Although such models have been employed to study Canada’s upper house in a comparative way,2 they have not been used extensively to understand the origins of the Senate’s underlying structure or to analyze reform proposals for their impact on its present multi-purposed roles. This paper proposes to give a brief description of the models which characterize pre- and post-Confederation second chambers. Given that many of the legal and procedural provisions concerning Canada’s current upper house can be traced back to the Constitutional Act, 1791 and the Act of Union, 1840, it will place Canadian bicameralism within its historical context. The Senate’s “architecture”, “essential characteristics” and “fundamental nature”, terms used in the 1980 and 2014 Supreme Court opinions but with no link to pre- Confederation antecedents, cannot be understood without references to Canadian parliamentary history. Finally, it will provide some observations on the nature of Canadian bicameralism and will conceptualize various reform proposals in terms of classification models.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern Senate of Canada: a Study in Functional Adaptability
    The Modern Senate of Canada: A Study in Functional Adaptability THE HONOURABLE DAN HAYS SPEAKER OF THE SENATE The Modern Senate of Canada: A Study in Functional Adaptability. The Senate of Canada was a defining element, or “deal breaker,” in the negotiations that led to the creation of our country in 1867, since Confederation would not have been taken place without it.1 Indeed, as Senator Lowell Murray has said: “Quebec and the Maritimes insisted on an Upper House with equal representation from the three regions as a counterweight to Ontario’s numerical advantage in the House of Commons. The Fathers of Confederation wanted to create a further check on the executive and its elected Commons majority. They decided this would best be accomplished by an appointed Senate whose members had life tenure.”2 And since its creation in 1867, the Senate of Canada has evolved into a modern and efficient legislative body. Although it remains a rare example of an unelected second chamber, along with Great Britain’s House of Lords3, it has adapted to changing times through a variety of administrative reforms that have allowed it to better play its legislative role and represent the interests of all Canadians more effectively. And even if it has been the subject of 28 major reform proposals over the past 30 years4 – all of which have failed to produce the changes sought – it continues to make an important and valuable contribution to public debate, and remains a cornerstone of Canada’s system of government. The failure of these proposals is likely due to the absence of a broad consensus on precisely how to reform the Senate, and to the considerable difficulty of amending Canada’s constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Review on the Provisions and Operation of the Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Production of Records in Sexual Offence
    Statutory Review on the Provisions and Operation of the Act to amend the Criminal Code (production of records in sexual offence proceedings) Final Report The Honourable Robert W. Runciman Chair The Honourable Joan Fraser Deputy Chair Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs December 2012 i Ce document est disponible en français This report can be downloaded at: http://senate-senat.ca/lcjc-e.asp Paper copies of this document are also available by contacting the Senate Committees Directorate at 613-990-0088 (Toll free: 1-800-267-7362) or at [email protected] ii TABLE OF CONTENTS MEMBERSHIP ...................................................................................................................................... V ORDER OF REFERENCE.................................................................................................................. VII INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................1 OUR STUDY AND ITS CONTEXT ........................................................................................................1 A. SEXUAL OFFENCES, THE CHARTER, AND CANADIAN CRIMINAL LAW REFORM ....................................1 B. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, R. V. O’CONNOR, AND BILL C-46 ...............................................3 1. R. v. O’Connor ....................................................................................................................................3 2. Bill C-46 ...............................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]