DOCSLIB.ORG

A Matter of Privilege: a Discussion Paper on Canadian Parliamentary Privilege in the 21St Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Matter of Privilege: a Discussion Paper on Canadian Parliamentary Privilege in the 21St Century A MATTER OF PRIVILEGE: A DISCUSSION PAPER ON CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE IN THE 21ST CENTURY Interim report of the Standing Committee on Rules, Procedures, and the Rights of Parliament Chair The Honourable Vernon White Deputy Chair The Honourable David P. Smith, PC. June 2015 MEMBERSHIP The Honourable Vernon White, Chair The Honourable David P. Smith, P.C., Deputy Chair The Honourable Denise Batters The Honourable Claude Carignan, P.C.* The Honourable Anne C. Cools The Honourable James S. Cowan* The Honourable Norman E. Doyle The Honourable Joan Fraser* The Honourable Linda Frum The Honourable George Furey The Honourable Leo Housakos The Honourable Mobina S.B. Jaffer The Honourable Serge Joyal, P.C. The Honourable Yonah Martin The Honourable Elaine McCoy The Honourable Paul E. McIntyre The Honourable David Tkachuk The Honourable David M. Wells *Ex officio members In addition, the Honourable Senators Selma Ataullahjan, Douglas Black, Suzanne Fortin-Duplessis, Nancy Ruth, Richard Neufeld and Pierre Claude Nolin were members of the committee or participated in its work on this report. Clerk of the Committee: Charles Robert Analyst from the Library of Parliament: Dara Lithwick TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND RENEW PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE IN CANADA ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Development of the Interim Report ................................................................................................. 4 PART I: PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE: TRACING ITS HISTORY TOWARDS A CONTEMPORARY APPROACH ................................................................................................................................................. 5 A. Parliamentary Privilege: History ...................................................................................................... 5 B. Towards a contemporary approach: Evolution of parliamentary privilege in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand ................................................................................................................................... 7 1. The United Kingdom ..................................................................................................................... 7 2. Australia ...................................................................................................................................... 12 3. New Zealand .............................................................................................................................. 16 PART II: PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE IN CANADA ............................................................................. 18 A. Privilege Since Confederation ....................................................................................................... 18 1. Privilege and the Constitution .................................................................................................... 18 2. Parliamentary Reviews of Rights, Immunities and Privileges .................................................... 20 B. The Courts, Parliamentary Privilege and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ........... 22 1. “Necessity” as the frame to interpret a privilege ........................................................................ 23 2. The Supreme Court of Canada, Parliamentary Privilege, and the Charter ............................... 25 C. Privilege in the provinces: Varying approaches to codification ..................................................... 32 D. Observations of the Rules Committee .......................................................................................... 36 PART III: FRAMEWORK TO ADAPT ELEMENTS OF PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE IN CANADA TO CONTEMPORARY NORMS ...................................................................................................................... 38 A. From the Necessity Test to an Accountability Framework: A Canadian Approach to Renew Parliamentary Privilege ................................................................................................................. 38 B. Freedom of Speech ....................................................................................................................... 39 1. Should the scope of freedom of speech be modified? ............................................................... 40 2. Proceedings in Parliament ......................................................................................................... 46 3. Observations of the Rules Committee to Adapt the Privilege of Freedom of Speech to Contemporary Norms ................................................................................................................. 48 C. The Collective Rights of the Senate and House of Commons to Regulate their Internal Affairs/ Exclusive Cognizance ................................................................................................................... 51 1. Developments abroad ................................................................................................................ 52 2. Canadian developments: Parliament is not a “statute-free zone” .............................................. 53 3. Observations of the Rules Committee to Adapt the Collective Rights of the Senate and House of Commons to Regulate their Internal Affairs to Contemporary Norms ................................... 54 D. Disciplinary Powers ....................................................................................................................... 56 i 1. Procedural Fairness: Disciplining Individual Parliamentarians .................................................. 57 2. Procedural Fairness: Disciplining non-Parliamentarians ........................................................... 60 3. Observations of the Rules Committee to Adapt the Disciplinary Powers of the Senate and House of Commons to Contemporary Norms ............................................................................ 64 E. Freedom from Arrest in Civil Actions and Related Individual Privileges ....................................... 67 1. Freedom from arrest in civil actions ........................................................................................... 67 2. Freedom from being subpoenaed to attend court as a witness ................................................. 70 3. Freedom from jury service .......................................................................................................... 72 4. Freedom from obstruction, interference, intimidation and molestation ...................................... 75 CONCLUSION: LOOKING AHEAD ........................................................................................................... 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................ 79 A. Legislation ...................................................................................................................................... 79 1. Canadian – Constitutional and Federal ...................................................................................... 79 2. Canadian - Provincial ................................................................................................................. 79 3. International ................................................................................................................................ 80 B. Jurisprudence ................................................................................................................................ 80 1. Canadian .................................................................................................................................... 80 2. International ................................................................................................................................ 81 C. Parliamentary Materials and Government Reports ....................................................................... 82 1. Canada ....................................................................................................................................... 82 2. International ................................................................................................................................ 83 D. Secondary Materials ...................................................................................................................... 83 ii INTRODUCTION: AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND RENEW PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE IN CANADA Parliamentary privilege, an essential component of parliamentary democracy, exists to enable Parliament to function effectively and efficiently without undue impediment. Originally developed in Westminster as a means of preventing interference by the sovereign in the workings of Parliament,1 it has developed in parliaments throughout the British Commonwealth. In Canada, it is enshrined in the Constitution Act, 1867, at section 18 and through its preamble,2 and is further confirmed in section 4 of the Parliament of Canada Act.3 The rights and immunities associated with parliamentary privilege include the following4: The rights of individual parliamentarians (as well as witnesses at committees) and the collective rights of the Senate and House of Commons to freedom of speech from outside impeachment for things said in the course of parliamentary proceedings; The collective rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In
    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: [email protected] 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliament
    The Parliament is composed of 3 distinct elements,the Queen1 the Senate and the House of Representatives.2 These 3 elements together characterise the nation as being a constitutional monarchy, a parliamentary democracy and a federation. The Constitution vests in the Parliament the legislative power of the Common- wealth. The legislature is bicameral, which is the term commoniy used to indicate a Par- liament of 2 Houses. Although the Queen is nominally a constituent part of the Parliament the Consti- tution immediately provides that she appoint a Governor-General to be her representa- tive in the Commonwealth.3 The Queen's role is little more than titular as the legislative and executive powers and functions of the Head of State are vested in the Governor- General by virtue of the Constitution4, and by Letters Patent constituting the Office of Governor-General.5 However, while in Australia, the Sovereign has performed duties of the Governor-General in person6, and in the event of the Queen being present to open Parliament, references to the Governor-General in the relevant standing orders7 are to the extent necessary read as references to the Queen.s The Royal Style and Titles Act provides that the Queen shall be known in Australia and its Territories as: Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.* There have been 19 Governors-General of Australia10 since the establishment of the Commonwealth, 6 of whom (including the last 4) have been Australian born. The Letters Patent, of 29 October 1900, constituting the office of Governor- General, 'constitute, order, and declare that there shall be a Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief in and over' the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SUBMISSION to the HOUSE of COMMONS STANDING COMMITTEE on PROC Thursday, April 23, 2020
    131.194 SUBMISSION TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROC Thursday, April 23, 2020 Gregory Tardi, DJur. Executive Director, Institute of Parliamentary and Political Law Executive Editor, Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law MANDATE FOR THE PROC STUDY The House of Commons of Canada’s Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs would like to invite you to appear before the Committee in view of its study of Parliamentary Duties and the COVID-19 Pandemic. The House of Commons has instructed the committee to study ways in which members can fulfill their parliamentary duties while the House stands adjourned on account of public health concerns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the temporary modification of certain procedures, sittings in alternate locations and technological solutions including a virtual Parliament Le Comité permanent de la procédure et des affaires de la Chambre des communes du Canada souhaite vous inviter à comparaître dans le cadre de son étude sur les fonctions parlementaires et la pandémie de la COVID-19. La Chambre des communes a donné instruction au comité d’entreprendre une étude sur la façon dont les députés peuvent exercer leurs fonctions parlementaires alors que la Chambre est ajournée pour des raisons de santé publique reliées à la pandémie de la COVID-19, y compris des modifications temporaires à certaines procédures, des séances en différents lieux et des solutions technologiques, dont l’idée d’un parlement virtuel. The following text was prepared by its author alone. No member of the Government of Canada or of the House of Commons of Canada was consulted.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE: Women Against Poverty Public Hearings ASWAC's Malling Address Is: Box 1573, Edmonton, T5J 2N7
    Alberta Status of Women Action Committee JUNE/JULY NEWSLETIER 198 9 Volume 10, Number 4 INSIDE: Women Against Poverty _Public Hearings ASWAC's malling address Is: Box 1573, Edmonton, T5J 2N7. The Edmonton office Is located at 9930-106 Street, on the lower floor with the rest of the Edmonton Women's Building. Phone 421-0306. Ofllce hours are Monday to Friday, 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 1988/89 Board Members ASWAC Lethbrldge is located In the Women's Resource Annette Aarbo - Edmonton Centre on top of Woolworths, at #202, 325 - 6 Street Noreen Bell-Geekle - Edmonton South, T1J 2C7. Phone 329-8338. Marla Seeber - Edmonton Jane Haslett - Edmonton The Calgary ASWAC office Is located In the Old Y Centre Helen Greaves - c/o Edmonton Office for Community Organizations, #303, 223 - 12 Avenue Shelley Scott - c/o Edmonton Office S. W., T2R OG9. Phone 233-0731 for recorded informa­ Jean Munn - CalgapY tion and to leave messages. M~rllyn Seelye - Calgary Jacqueline Preyde - Calgary Anne McGrath - c/o Calgary Office Nancy Miller - Calgary Debbie Foster - Lethbrldge Rita Kolpak - c/o Lethbrldge Office Since April, ASWAC has gratefully received donations from the following wonderful women: Janet Maher. Mary Johnson, Evelyn Stymest, H.L. Murray, Pam Barrett, 1988/89 Regional Representatives Elaine Fllax, Sylvia Waller, Adena Rose, Anne Debbie, Diana Chown, Katharine Hunt, Mutty Mathewson, Debra Elaine Peters - Calgary Shogan and Marilyn Assheton-Smlth. Thank-you! And a 285-1214 special thanks to Denise Purcell, who has been re­ organizing the library in the Edmonton office. Addle Miron - Lethbridge 327-4396 Lois Soderstrom - Westerose 586-2091 The ASWAC Newsletter is produced In Edmonton by the Gerry Balley - Westerose Newsletter Collective, with contributions from across 586-2983 the province.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modernizing Canada's Electoral System: Instant Runoff Voting As The
    Modernizing Canada’s Electoral System: Instant Runoff Voting as the Best Alternative By Maxime Dubé, as an individual Summary In the context of electoral reform brought about by the current government, many electoral systems come into contention for replacing the current first-past-the-post (FPTP) system. In this brief, it is argued that the instant-runoff voting (IRV) system is the best alternative for the current FPTP system in Canada. It solves most of Canadians’ issues with the current system, while presenting itself as the least challenging option for all bodies implicated in a federal election. Additionally, the IRV system does not produce coalition governments like other systems, thus allowing the state to remain strong and effective. The adoption of mandatory voting should only be considered after researching methods that will incentivize citizens to vote. Finally, online voting should not to be considered, due to potential security concerns. Introduction The present FPTP system is an electoral system that has been, and still is widely used throughout the world. It “is one of the oldest and simplest electoral systems”1 For instance, this voting system is presently used in all legislative elections in Canada, for national parliamentary elections in the United Kingdom and the United States of America, as well as for India and most Caribbean islands2. With the election of the current majoritarian Liberal government in the 2015 general election, one of the electoral promises made by the party and its leader, Justin Trudeau, was that the general election of 2015 would be the last federal election to be held with the FPTP system3.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    Debates of the Senate 1st SESSION . 42nd PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 150 . NUMBER 52 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, June 17, 2016 The Honourable GEORGE J. FUREY Speaker CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: Kim Laughren, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1207 THE SENATE Friday, June 17, 2016 The Senate met at 9 a.m., the Speaker in the chair. quarantine of Iranian society so that they may more firmly hold it in their grip. Prayers. Honourable senators, newspaper reports suggest that our federal government is ``actively engaged'' in this case and SENATORS' STATEMENTS working closely with allies to assist Homa Hoodfar. It is my hope that their efforts to free both Saeed Malekpour and Homa Hoodfar from the malign and criminal Iranian regime IRAN will be successful. DETENTION OF HOMA HOODFAR In the meantime, I know that all honourable senators will continue to follow their cases with deep concern as we continue to Hon. Linda Frum: Honourable senators, as I rise today, I note condemn the brutal regime that has seen fit to take them hostage. that it has been almost exactly one month to this day since the Senate of Canada conducted its inquiry into the plight of innocently detained political prisoners in Iran. Today, I wish to remind us all that holding Iran accountable for PAUL G. KITCHEN its flagrant abuses of human rights cannot solely take place during a two-day inquiry, or even an annual Iran Accountability Week; it ROTHESAY NETHERWOOD SCHOOL— must take place every single day, because, sadly, there is great CONGRATULATIONS ON RETIREMENT cause for vigilance on this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND the BOX Alumni, Faculty and Staff Share Insights on Creativity And
    SPRING 2016 BEYOND THE BOX Alumni, faculty and staff share insights on creativity and CANADA POST PUBLI CANADA POST innovation C ATIONS: MAIL ATIONS: DR. GWYNEDD PICKETT (BSc’92, MD’98), FACULTY OF MEDICINE P M41901013 PLUS / GOING GLOBAL / BOOSTING CHILDREN’S HEALTH / dedicated to DIVERSITY Visit our website at dal.ca/dalmag CONTENTS SPRING 2016 DAL RESEARCH EATING & MOVING KIDS’ ZONE “Healthy behaviour is actually abnormal in our culture,” says Sara Kirk. The Canada Research Chair and profes- sor at the School of Health and Human Performance notes how our modern society has undermined health be- Dalhousie’s internationally recognized research has real-world haviours, leading to increasing rates of chronic disease in adults and children. With cities designed for cars and en- impact in a host of areas, including the physical, mental and emotional ergy-dense processed food easily available, healthy, active health of children. It’s important work. By Dawn Morrison living is challenging for many of us. Dr. Kirk’s research is FEATURES 1 focused on finding ways to create healthier communities. BIG SMILES Dalhousie University’s Faculty of Dentistry operates free pediatric dental clinics to improve low-income children’s access to oral care in Dartmouth and North Preston. Clin- ics are staffed with a pediatric dentist and dentistry and HEALTHY BODIES dental hygiene students. “The clinics are one of the main places dentistry students will get experience in pedadon- tics while they are in dental school, so they gain valuable experience.” says Janice Ruppert, a dental assistant who 2 manages one of the clinics.
    [Show full text]
  • HAPPY CANADA DAY! Political Wrangling, and Fter Monthsoftrade Talks, L Ad E
    Meaningful COVID-19 Lisa Van police reform a game Dusen: might need a changer Pass the vodka for Arctic shake up in cooler and international thank God the top ranks co-operation we’re a middle of the RCMP p. 11 Les Whittington p. 4 Natalia Loukacheva p. 12 power Meet Dominiqueq Angladelade p. 13 THIRTY-FIRST YEAR, NO. 1741 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 2020 $5.00 News News ‘I felt silenced’: New NAFTA comes into force after voices missing from Upper Chamber’s months of testy renegotiations, but systemic racism debate, say some Senators, ‘disruptions’ will need to be addressed highlighting need The trade relationship for hybrid model between U.S. President Donald BY SAMANTHA WRIGHT ALLEN Trump, Mexican President Andrés itnessing the Red Chamber Manuel López Wdebate on systemic racism Obrador, and Prime from afar was tough on Senators Minister Justin who have lived the experiences Trudeau will be but couldn’t be in Ottawa, and guided by the new while some accepted the pandem- North American ic made that unavoidable, others trade pact, which say it demonstrates why virtual came into force sittings are so important. on July 1. White It was hard for Progressive House photograph Senator Lillian Dyck to watch by Tia Dufour, Flickr photograph courtesy Continued on page 6 of the Mexican President’s Offi ce, The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade News Backroom, Capitol BY NEIL MOSS a reality, but the coming weeks Dating back to 2017, U.S. Pres- government has some certainty Hill lobbying key and months will have “disrup- ident Donald Trump threatened over the future of Canada’s trad- fter months of trade talks, tions” as exporters adjust to to discard the pact that had been ing relationship with the world’s to fi ghting possible Apolitical wrangling, and new trade rules, say trade infl uencing North American trade return of tariff s, says waiting, the new NAFTA is now observers.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned by Camscanner
    Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner IRONING OUT THE CREASES: RE-EXAMINING THE CONTOURS OF INVOKING ARTICLE 142(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION Rajat Pradhan* ABSTRACT In the light of the extraordinary and rather frequent invocation of Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India, this note expounds a constructive theory of perusing Article 142(1) by the Supreme Court. The central inquiry seeks to answer the contemporaneous question of whether Article 142 can be invoked to make an order or pass a decree which is inconsistent or in express conflict with the substantive provisions of a statute. To aid this inquiry, cases where the apex court has granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent in exercise of Article 142(1) have been examined extensively. Thus the note also examines the efficacy and indispensible nature of this power in nebulous cases where the provisions of a statute are insufficient for solving contemporary problems or doing complete justice. INTRODUCTION An exemplary provision, Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India envisages that the Supreme Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such enforceable decree or order as is necessary for doing ‘complete justice’ in any cause or matter pending before it. While the jurisprudence surrounding other provisions of the Constitution has developed manifold, rendering them more concrete and stable interpretations, Article 142(1) is far from tracing this trend. The nature and scope of power contemplated in Article 142(1) has continued to be mooted imaginatively.
    [Show full text]
  • CANADIAN POLITICS Contents
    McMaster University, Department of Political Science, POLSCI 4O06/6O06 CANADIAN POLITICS Fall/Winter 2018-19 Instructor: Dr. Geoffrey Cameron Office: KTH 505 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Friday, 12pm – 2pm Seminar: Friday, 8:30am – 11:20am Room: KTH 105 Contents Course Description .......................................................................................................... 3 Course Objectives ........................................................................................................... 3 Required Materials and Texts ......................................................................................... 3 Course Evaluation – Overview ........................................................................................ 3 Course Evaluation – Details ............................................................................................ 3 Attendance (10%) ........................................................................................................ 3 Participation (10%) ...................................................................................................... 4 Class Presentation (5%) .............................................................................................. 4 In-Class Test (10%), September 28............................................................................. 4 Research Proposal (15%), due February 8 ................................................................. 4 Research Proposal Presentation (5%) ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
    [Show full text]