DOCSLIB.ORG

ESPON BRIDGES Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ESPON BRIDGES Final Report ESPON BRIDGES Balanced Regional Development in areas with Geographic Specificities Applied Research Final Report Annex 2 - Case Study Syntheses Version 02/10/2019 This applied research activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Erik Gløersen, Clément Corbineau, Maria Toptsidou, Silke Haarich, Frank Holstein, Christian Lüer, Amparo Montán (Spatial Foresight (Lead Partner) – Luxembourg, France, Germany) Martin Price, Diana Valero, Rosalind Bryce, Jayne Glass (Perth College, University of the highlands and Islands (UHI) – UK) Frédéric Maier, Jacek Walendowski, Ruslan Zhechkov, Laura Roman, Léonor Rivoire, Maialen Perez, Morgane Veillet Lavallée, Nathan Kably, Vanina Choe (Technopolis – Belgium and France) Thomas Streifeneder, Valentina Cattivelli, Francesca Teston (EURAC – Italy) Julien Grunfelder, Luciane Aguiar Borges, Anna Berlina (Nordregio – Sweden) Stephanie Vella, Bernice Amaira (E-cubed – Malta) Alexandre Dubois (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) – Sweden) Franziska Sielker, Phil Allmendinger (University of Cambridge – UK) Benito Giordano (University of Liverpool – UK) Carsten Schürmann (TCP International – Germany) Andrea De Bono, Hy Dao (University of Geneva – Switzerland) Gretar Eythorsson, Hjalti Johannesson (University of Akureyri – Iceland) Marina Blagaić Bergman, Marina Turk (WYG – Croatia) Martyna Derszniak-Noirjean, Erich Dallhammer (Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning (ÖIR) – Austria) Alexandru Ghita (CDUT – Romania) Eduarda Marques da Costa (University of Lisbon – Portugal) Åge Mariussen and Jarle Løvland (Nordlandsforskning – Norway) Lise Smed Olsen (Denmark) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Debbie Cachia, Ministry for European Affairs and Equality (Malta), Hans-Henrik Bull, Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation (Norway), Eleni Zouppouri, Ministry of the Interior (Cyprus) ESPON EGTC: Project Expert: Sandra di Biaggio, Director: Ilona Raugze, Financial Expert: Rosa Martin Lopez Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2018 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] a ESPON BRIDGES Territories with Geographical Specificities Table of contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ vi List of Maps .............................................................................................................................. vii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... viii Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. x 1 Introduction to case studies ............................................................................................. 13 2 Module 1.1: Innovation – specificity of innovation processes in TGS ........................... 16 2.1 Review of the applied methodology to conduct the case studies ........................... 17 2.2 Presentation of results ............................................................................................ 18 2.2.1 Overview of case study regions and thematic focus ..................................... 18 2.2.2 TGS innovation potential ................................................................................ 20 2.2.3 Main geographic specificity-related barriers to innovation ............................. 23 2.2.4 Governance framework in place to support innovation in the TGS ............... 26 2.3 Innovation policies and relevance for the TGS context .......................................... 28 2.3.1 European level ............................................................................................... 29 2.3.2 National level ................................................................................................. 31 2.3.3 Regional level ................................................................................................ 32 2.3.4 Local level ...................................................................................................... 33 2.4 Conclusions - perspectives - next steps ................................................................. 34 3 Module 1.2: Sustainable tourism – perspectives and strategies in TGS ...................... 36 3.1 Presentation of module theme and research questions ......................................... 36 3.1.1 Definition ........................................................................................................ 36 3.1.2 Overall goal of developing the case studies .................................................. 36 3.1.3 Principles and considerations ........................................................................ 37 TGS perspective ............................................................................................ 37 Focused case studies .................................................................................... 37 3.1.4 Typology of the regions with regards to their progress to sustainable tourism .................................... 37 3.1.5 Identifying pressures from tourism and answers/solutions to these pressures ..................................................... 37 3.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 38 3.2.1 Measuring the performance of the tourism sector: indicators ........................ 38 3.2.2 Issues explored/research questions in the case studies ............................... 38 3.2.3 Policy processes / debates the module feed into .......................................... 38 3.3 Presentation of results ............................................................................................ 39 3.3.1 General descriptions of the regions and their assets .................................... 39 Transition regions .......................................................................................... 39 Pre-transition regions ..................................................................................... 40 3.4 Potential for the development of sustainable tourism: drivers and barriers to the development of sustainable tourism in the region. Pressures from tourism. .......... 41 3.4.1 Mountainous areas ........................................................................................ 41 3.4.2 Remote areas ................................................................................................ 42 ESPON 2020 i 3.4.3 Islands ............................................................................................................ 42 3.4.4 Coastal areas ................................................................................................. 43 3.4.5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 44 3.5 Stakeholders ........................................................................................................... 44 3.5.1 Algarve ........................................................................................................... 44 3.5.2 Danube Delta ................................................................................................. 45 3.5.3 Isernia ............................................................................................................ 46 3.5.4 Norfolk – Suffolk ............................................................................................. 46 3.5.5 North Aegean ................................................................................................. 46 3.5.6 Tatra Mountains ............................................................................................. 47 3.5.7 Tenerife .......................................................................................................... 47 3.5.8 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 47 3.6 Existing policy capacity and policy framework ........................................................ 48 3.6.1 Transition regions .......................................................................................... 49 Norfolk – Suffolk ............................................................................................. 49 North Aegean ................................................................................................. 50 Tenerife .......................................................................................................... 50 3.6.2 Pre-transition region ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feasibility Study for Siting of a Deep Repository Within the Mala Municipality
    SE9800008 TECHNICAL REPORT 96-22 Feasibility study for siting of a deep repository within the Mala municipality Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co March 1996 SVENSK KARNBRANSLEHANTERING AB SWEDISH NUCLEAR FUEL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT CO P.O.BOX 5864 S-102 40 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN PHONE +46 8 665 28 00 FAX+46 8 661 57 19 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SITING OF A DEEP REPOSITORY WITHIN THE MALA MUNICIPALITY March 1996 -08 Key words: Deep repository, site selection, feasibility study, Mala FOREWORD This report presents the results of the feasibility study in Mala, summarizing a broad investigative effort undertaken to shed light on the prospects for siting a deep repository in the municipality of Mala, and what consequences this would have for the individual, the community and the environment. SKB's overall evaluation is that the municipality of Mala could provide good pros- pects for a deep repository. We would like to mention two factors in particular as arguments in support of this conclusion; the bedrock and the local mining tradition. The bedrock is decisive in determining the feasibility of achieving safe disposal, and there are large areas in Mala Municipality where we judge the bedrock conditions to be good. We cannot determine, however, whether a particular site is definitely suitable from the feasibility study - that will require direct investigations on the site. The mining industry, with all its peripheral activities, has through the years made Mala a centre of knowledge on geoscience and underground rock excavation. We are familiar with the value of this knowledge because specialists from Mala - geologists, geophysicists, diamond drillers and others - have participated in SKB's development activities since the start in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNICAL REPORT 85-08 Feasibility Study For
    r^ TECHNICAL REPORT 85-08 Feasibility study for siting of a deep repository within the Storuman municipality Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co January 1995 SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING AB SWEDISH NUCLEAR FUEL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT CO BOX 5864 S-102 40 STOCKHOLM TEL. 08-665 28 00 TELEX 13108 SKB TELEFAX 08-661 57 19 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SITING OF A DEEP REPOSITORY WITHIN THE STORUMAN MUNICIPALITY January 1995 Key words: Deep repository, site selection, feasibility study, Storuman FOREWORD 1 his report summarizes the results of the feasibility study in Storuman. It also contains SKB's collective evaluation of the results (Chapter 11). A status report was published in June 1994. The purpose of the status report was to give the municipality, its reference group and other interested groups in Storuman and in the region, a basis for discussion and opinions before the final report was written. Numerous viewpoints have been presented and have occasioned some supplemen- tary studies or adjustments and additions to the final report. The viewpoints of the reference group on the status report are compiled in an appendix to this final report. For SKB's part, this report represents the conclusion of the feasibility study. As is evident from the viewpoints of the reference group, there are important questions that have not been fully answered within the framework of the feasibility study. Answering some of these questions requires information that can only be provided by a site investigation. Other questions of a more general nature can be taken up if the final evaluation of the feasibility study results in a common interest to continue site investigations in Storuman.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Health Care and Social Care Regional Development Impacts in the Nordic Countries
    Digital Health Care and Social Care Regional development impacts in the Nordic countries Anna Lundgren, Louise Ormstrup Vestergård, Ágúst Bogason, Johanna Carolina Jokinen, Oskar Penje, Shinan Wang, Gustaf Norlén, Linnea Löfving and Timothy Heleniak NORDREGIO REPORT 2020:14 1 Digital Health Care and Social Care Regional development impacts in the Nordic countries Anna Lundgren, Louise Ormstrup Vestergård, Ágúst Bogason, Johanna Carolina Jokinen, Oskar Penje, Shinan Wang, Gustaf Norlén, Linnea Löfving and Timothy Heleniak NORDREGIO REPORT 2020:14 Digital Health Care and Social Care – Regional development impacts in the Nordic countries Nordregio Report 2020:14 ISBN 978-91-8001-001-6 ISSN 1403-2503 DOI: doi.org/10.6027/R2020:14.1403-2503 © Nordregio 2020 Nordregio P.O. Box 1658 SE-111 86 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] www.nordregio.org www.norden.org Authors: Anna Lundgren, Louise Ormstrup Vestergård, Ágúst Bogason, Johanna Carolina Jokinen, Oskar Penje, Shinan Wang, Gustaf Norlén, Linnea Löfving and Timothy Heleniak Cover photo: Andreas Forsberg, Unsplash Nordregio is a leading Nordic and European research centre for regional development and planning, established by the Nordic Council of Ministers in 1997. We conduct solution-oriented and applied research, addressing current issues from both a research perspective and the viewpoint of policymakers and practitioners. Operating at the international, national, regional and local levels, Nordregio’s research covers a wide geographic scope, with an emphasis on the Nordic and Baltic Sea Regions, Europe and the Arctic. The Nordic co-operation Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland.
    [Show full text]
  • Sammanfattning-Projekt-E12-Atlantica
    E12 Atlantica Transport The project is based on cross-border cooperation between partners in Finland, Sweden and Norway along the E12, focusing on development of a functional multi-modal transport route for goods and passengers, joint strategies for cross-border planning and future cooperation structures. WORK PACKAGES PURPOSE 1. A FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORT ROUTE To reduce border barriers and Identify possibilities to further opti- continue the development of mize and develop east-west transport the E12 that runs from Finland solutions through Sweden and further on to Norway and the Atlantic 2. CROSS-BORDER STRATEGIES coast. Further develop structures for cross- border planning and traffic strategies To create favorable conditions for strengthening the corridor’s 3. FUTURE COOPERATION STRUCTURES attractiveness and develop- Identify, analyze and present cooperation ment possibilities. A more structures designed to strengthen the developed cooperation with conditions for joint cross-border visions. trade and industry is formal- Increase collaboration in the region, ized, which creates better as well as with adjoining understanding of the trade and transport corridors industry’s transport demands. To strengthen cooperation Timetable: January 2016 – May 2018 between Kvarken Council, Budget Finland / Sweden: 2 197 500 EUR MidtSkandia and Blå Vägen, EU-support: 1 318 500 EUR as well as their partners. (60 % of budget Finland / Sweden) Budget Norway: 381 691 EUR IR-support: 190 846 EUR Total project budget: 2 579 191 EUR FOR MORE INFORMATION AND
    [Show full text]
  • Report: Local Land Use Planning: Guidance on Spatial Data
    REPORT 2017:1 Remote communities & resource-based industries Local land use planning: Guidance on spatial data, geographic information systems and foresight in the Arctic Ryan Weber, Svein Morten Eilertsen & Leena Suopajärvi Local land use planning: Guidance on spatial data, geographic information systems and foresight in the Arctic Local land use planning: Guidance on spatial data, geographic information systems and foresight in the Arctic Remote communities & resource-based industries Local land use planning: Guidance on spatial data, geographic information systems and foresight in the Arctic Ryan Weber, Svein Morten Eilertsen & Leena Suopajärvi Local land use planning: Guidance on spatial data, geographic information systems and foresight in the Arctic REGINA Report 2017:1 ISBN 978-91-87295-45-4 © Nordregio 2017 Nordregio P.O. Box 1658 SE-111 86 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] www.nordregio.se www.norden.org Analyses and text: Ryan Weber, Svein Morten Eilertsen & Leena Suopajärvi Cover photo: Calum Davidson, June 29 2016, Flying over Easter Ross in June, Nigg and Cromarty REGINA project Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collabora- tion, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland. Nordic co-operation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an important role in European and international collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe. Nordic co-operation seeks to safeguard Nordic and regional interests and principles in the global community. Common Nordic values help the region solidify its position as one of the world’s most innovative and competitive.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM Yearbook 2014 Yearbook 2014
    ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM ARCTIC BUSINESS www.arcticbusinessforum.com FORUM Yearbook 2014 Yearbook 2014 Publisher: Lapland Chamber of Commerce ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM YEARBOOK 2014 March 2014 Compiled and edited by Timo Rautajoki © Lapland Chamber of Commerce, 2014 3 ARCTIC SEA Airport Harbour Lakselv Railway Andenes Narvik Svolvaer Leknes Pajala Bodø Gällivare Mo I Rana Arvidsjaur Mosjøen Brønnøysund AND FINL NORWAY SWEDEN 4 ARCTIC SEA BARENBARENTSTS RUSSRUSSIAIA 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD ....................................................8 2. ARCTIC COUNCIL, ARCTIC POLICIES AND ARCTIC BUSINESS .........10 2.1 Arctic Council. 10 2.2 Arctic Economic Council ..................................17 2.3 Report from World Economic Forum: “Demystifying the Arctic” ..................................25 2.4 USA and Alaska. 29 2.5 Crisis in Ukraine and the Arctic .............................38 3. NORTH OF FINLAND ............................................40 3.1 LAPLAND .............................................41 3.1.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ............................63 3.1.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 ......................65 3.1.2.1 Investments expected to start first. 69 3.1.2.2 Investments waiting for better times .........................70 3.1.2.3 Key investment project of Lapland . .72 3.2 Oulu REGION .........................................74 3.2.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ............................86 3.2.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 ......................91 3.2.2.1 Investments expected to start first. 93 3.2.2.2 Investments waiting for better times .........................93 3.2.2.3 Key investment project of Oulu Region. 95 3.3 KAINUU REGION .......................................96 3.3.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ...........................100 3.3.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 .....................101 3.3.2.1 Investments expected to start first.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 North of Finland
    1 ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM YEARBOOK 2015 March 2015 Compiled and edited by Timo Rautajoki © Lapland Chamber of Commerce, 2015 2 3 BARENTS ARCTIC SEA RUSSIA FINLAND SWeden NORWAY 4 5 Airport ARCTIC SEA Harbour Railway BARENTS FINLAND ay W eden nor W russia S 6 7 6. NORTHWEST RUSSIA ...................................144 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.1 Murmansk Region ...............................145 6.1.1 Investment potential ...............................158 1. FOREWORD .............................................10 6.1.2 Development of the region 2016–2020 ................161 6.2 Arkhangelsk Region .............................168 2. ARCTIC COUNCIL, ARCTIC POLICIES 6.2.1 Investment potential ...............................181 AND ARCTIC BUSINESS ..................................12 6.2.2 Development of the region 2016–2020 ................182 2.1 Arctic Economic Council ............................12 2.2 Background and preparatory work of the AEC ............14 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ...........................186 2.3 US Chair in the Arctic Council ........................16 2.4 Arctic Council structure .............................19 8. MAPS AND STATISTICS ..................................191 8.1 European High North investment potential projects. 191 3. NORTH OF FINLAND. 26 8.2 Industry projects ..................................191 3.1 Lapland .........................................27 8.3 Mining industry projects ............................192 3.1.1 Investment potential ................................50 8.4 Energy projects ..................................192
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Demographic Change in Resource Peripheries in Australia and Sweden
    Comparative Population Studies Vol. 41, 3-4 (2016): 379-406 (Date of release: 14.12.2016) Decline, Adaptation or Transformation: New Perspectives on Demographic Change in Resource Peripheries in Australia and Sweden Dean B. Carson, Doris A. Carson, Rob Porter, Celia Yoshida Ahlin, Peter Sköld Abstract: Many sparsely populated resource peripheries in developed countries are perceived to suffer from periods of demographic decline due to loss of employ- ment opportunities and services, youth out-migration and population ageing. While these trends tend to apply at broad regional scales and for particular time periods, diverse patterns of demographic change may be apparent if different spatial, tem- poral and social scales of analysis are taken into consideration. Comparing the ex- periences of two case study regions in northern Sweden and inland South Australia, this paper proposes an alternative conceptual framework to the “discourse of de- cline”, which could be used to examine the nuances of demographic change within resource peripheries. The framework includes spatial scale considerations that con- trast broader regional demographic patterns with the experiences of sub-regions and individual settlements. It also includes temporal scale aspects, examining de- mographic change over different time periods to understand the pace, duration and frequency of population growth and decline. The framework fi nally includes social unit considerations, emphasising that demographic change affects different social groups in different ways. The results of the case studies suggest that considering demographic change as adaptation or transformation rather than decline may be more useful for identifying new – and qualitatively different – demographic path- ways that emerge over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation
    BitStream – Capacity Building for Innovation Ulf Hedestig & Mikael Soderstrom Department of Informatics Umea University The context: Public Sector in Sweden/ Norway Mikael Söderström Institutionen för informatik 2 Umeå universitet Background • The population is getting older => Greater demand for service • Changes in our society - technological developments, new demands from citizens, etc. => Puts pressure on the Public sector to change their way of delivering service • High degree of adoption of technology and digital infrastructure in Scandinavia • Horizon 2020 and 24/7 • But, solutions for the public sector is often copied from the private sector Ulf Hedestig & Mikael Department of Informatics 3 Söderström Umeå University Challenge 1: Scarcely populated areas • Municipality and inhabitants per km2 – Arjeplog: 0,5 – Arvidsjaur: 1,5 – Lycksele: 2,5 – Storuman: 1 – Sorsele: 0,5 – Vilhelmina: 1 – Dorotea: 1 – Malå: 2 Ulf Hedestig & Mikael Department of Informatics 4 Söderström Umeå University Challenge 2: Less young people entering the workforce than retirements Number of people Retirements Young people Year Figures for the county of Jamtland, Source: Statistics Sweden Conclusion The Public Sector needs models and tools that allows them to conduct business development based on their own conditions! Ulf Hedestig & Mikael Department of Informatics 6 Söderström Umeå University The Bitstream project: Goals • Create a transnational platform for capacity building and exchange of experiences in the area of innovative business development • Explore
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Welfare State: Experiences from Mining Communities in Sweden
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a chapter published in Natural resources and regional development theory. Citation for the original published chapter: Knobblock, E. (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the welfare state: Experiences from mining communities in Sweden. In: Linda Lundmark, Camilla Sandström (ed.), Natural resources and regional development theory (pp. 158-175). Umeå: Institutionen för geografi och ekonomisk historia, Umeå universitet GERUM Kulturgeografisk arbetsrapport N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published chapter. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-85149 Chapter 8. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the welfare state: Experiences from mining communities in Sweden Erika Knobblock Department of Geography and Economic History, Umeå University, Sweden Introduction The last 15-20 years the research field of social responsibility has grown significantly, attracting international policy interest, most often under the heading of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (EU-COM 2006, De Geer et al. 2010, Brejning 2012). The CSR concept has gained interest through the debate about globalization, competitiveness and sustainability (EU-COM 2006). The outcome is a vast amount of literature on the implementation and outcomes of CSR initiatives on companies. However, the effects of CSR on society have been to a large extent neglected in research (Banerjee 2010, Brejning 2012). As a result, little is known about the effects of social responsibility initiatives on society and communities, and about the possible differences between places and contexts. Until the first decades of the 20th century, mining and other types of natural resource extraction contributed to the establishment of new settlements and to development of existing communities in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Region Västerbotten Action Plan 2018-2020 Towards an Innovation Loop
    ACTION PLAN 2018-2020 Region Västerbotten Action Plan 2018-2020 Towards an Innovation Loop express for regional development OPEN SOCIAL INNOVATION POLICIES DRIVEN BY CO-CREATIVE REGIONAL INNOVATION ECO-SYSTEMS 1 ACTION PLAN 2018-2020 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. OSIRIS IN A NUTSHELL 3 2. POLICY CONTEXT 4 2.1 TERRITORIAL CONTEXT OF REGION VÄSTERBOTTEN 4 2.2. ROLE OF THE INNOVATION LOOP FOR REGIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT 5 2.3 POLICY INSTRUMENT OBJECTIVE AND PRIORITY 8 2.4 OTHER REGIONAL STRATEGIES TO BE CONSIDERED 9 2.5 RATIONALE AND AIMS OF THE INTENDED POLICY CHANGES 11 3. METHODOLOGY FOR DESIGNING THE ACTION PLAN 12 3.1 LEARNING FROM THE INTERREGIONAL EXCHANGE PROCESS 12 3.2 STRATEGIC ADVICE AND POLICY RECOMMENDATION FROM THE LOCAL STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEETINGS 14 4. DETAILS OF THE ACTIONS ENVISAGED 16 ACTION 1: IMPLEMENT A STRATEGY TO STRENGTHEN THE INNOVATION LOOP FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 16 ACTION 2: STRENGTHENING THE PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE OF THE PI THROUGH THE INNOVATION LOOP 20 ACTION 3: STIMULATING SYNERGIES BETWEEN PROJECTS THROUGH THE INNOVATION LOOP EXPRESS 22 List of figures FIGURE 1 - MAP OF OSIRIS CONSORTIUM PRESENTED AT THE EWRC CONFERENCE 3 FIGURE 2 - MAP OF REGION VÄSTERBOTTEN 4 FIGURE 3 - THE INNOVATION LOOP AS PRESENTED AT EWRC 7 FIGURE 4 - UPPER NOORLAND – ERDF – SOURCE: OPEN DATA PORTAL 8 FIGURE 5 - POLICY INSTRUMENT IN THE BROADER POLICY CONTEXT 10 FIGURE 6 - ROLE OF OSIRIS ACTION PLAN IN THE POLICY CONTEXT 11 FIGURE 7 - LIST OF LOCAL STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEETINGS 14 FIGURE 8 - SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE INNOVATION LOOP 15 FIGURE 9 - TIMELINE OF THE ACTION PLAN 16 2 ACTION PLAN 2018-2020 Executive Summary This docUment illUstrates the action plan developed by Region Västerbotten dUring the Interreg EUrope project OSIRIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Plan for Wind Power
    Additional Plan for Wind Power municipalities o f s t o r u m a n a n d s o r s e l e a m e n d m e n t t o m u n i c i p a l s t r u c t u r a l p l a n approved by sorsele municipal council, april 26th 2010 storuman municipal council, june 22nd 2010 Project manager: Matilda Schön and Erika Arklöf Assistant project manager: Matilda Schön Maps: Lantmäteriet, Erika Arklöf and Anna Edvall Text: Matilda Schön and Erika Arklöf Text editors: Matilda Schön and Kristina Nilson Photographic images: Bildbyrån 65n.com, Juha Nyberg and Matilda Schön Layout: Linjalen 3.0, Anna Edvall Map contract: Lantmäteriet GSD MS 2006/02327 and Lantmäteriverket MS 2007/05868 Translation: Duncan Kemp, Get it Write Translations, Storuman Amendment to Municipal Structural Plan Contents Wind power in the municipalities of Storuman and Sorsele _ 6 Unbroken areas of mountain terrain __________________ 30 Government planning targets _________________________ 6 Nature conservation _______________________________ 30 How to read Additional Plan for Wind Power ____________7 Communications __________________________________ 30 Additional reading about wind power ___________________7 Substances and materials ___________________________ 30 Energy - wind power _______________________________ 31 » Part 1. Background ........................................9 » Other public interests .......................................... 32 Sustainable community development __________________ 10 Outdoor recreation ________________________________ 32 National and regional environmental objectives
    [Show full text]