SD Publication Series Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SD Publication Series Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis In SD Publication Series Office ofSustainable Development Bureau forAfrica * Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis in East Africa Executive Summary Gordon Anyango The Management Center Nairobi, Kenya Technoserve, Inc. Nairobi, Kenya Technical Paper No. 21 June 1996 '4ii"i * A Joint Publication ofAFR/SD and REDSO/ESA Thi publication is part ofthe ~ional Trade Agenda Series USAID I Africa Bureau Office of Sustainable Development Productive Sector Growth and Environment Division Food Security and Productivity Unit and Regional Economic Development Support Office Eastern and Southern Africa, Office of Agriculture and Natural Resources Activity Title Regional Trade and Comparative Advantage in Eastern and Southern Africa: Implications for Food Security The series includes thefollowing publications: • Trade et: U. ers Guide to InterMail • Comparative Analysis ofEcollomic R fonn and Structural Adju tment Programs in East Africa: With Emphasi on Trade Policies • Comparative Analy i ofEconomic Reform and Structural Adjustment Program in Ea t Africa: With Emphasi on Trade Policies-ANNEX • Comparative Transportation Cost Analy i in Ea t Africa: Executive Summary • Comparative Transportation Co t Analy is in East Africa: Final Report • Comparative Analysis ofStTuctural Adjustment Policie in Southern Africa: With Emphasis on Agriculture and Trade • Comparative ost ofProduction Analy i in East Africa: Implicationsjor Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage • Methodologies for Estimating Informal Cro s-Border Trade in Eastern and Southern Africa • Reported Trad in East and Southern Africa: Analysis ojOfficially Reported Data • Analy i ofPolicy Reform and tructural Adju tment Program in Malawi: With Emphasis on Agriculture and Trade • Struchrral Adju tment and Agricultural Policy Reform in South Africa • Policy Reform and Structural Adjustment in Zambia: The Case ojAgriculture and Trade • Analy i ofPolicy Refoffil and tructural Adjustment Program in Zimbabwe: With Empha i on Agriculture and Trade For more information about the series, contact: Office ofSustainable Development REDSOIESAIAR Brian D'Silva Joe Carvalho USAIDIAFRJSD/PSGE USAIDfREDSOIESNANR Rm 2744 S, Wa hington D.C. 20523-0089 airobi, Kenya TEL: 703-235-5254; FAX: 703-235-3805 TEL: 254-2-751613; FAX: 254-2-743204 Intern t: bdsilva@u aid.gov Intern t: jcarvalho@u aid.gov Productive Sector Growth and Environment Division Office of Sustainable Development Bureau for Africa U. S. Agency for International Development Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis in East Africa Executive Summary Prepared in January 1996 by: Gordon Anyango The Management Center Nairobi. Kenya Summitted by: Technoserve, Inc. Nairobi, Kenya Project CA 623-0478-00-3180-00 June 1996 Publication services provided by AMEX Intemational, Inc. pursuant to the following USAID contract: Project Title: Policy, Analysis, Research, and Technical "4N'·' Support Project Project Number: 698-0478 • Contract Number: AOT-0478-C-00-3168-00 Contents Foreword v Acknowledgments vii Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations IX 1.· Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis in East Africa Introduction 1 Historical Transportation Perspective 1 The Current Routes 2 Potential New Routes 3 Other Modes 4 2. Major Issues in Transit Traffic 5 Ports' Infrastructure and Facilities 5 Customs Services 5 The Railway System 6 Road Freight Transportation System 7 Marine Services 8 Coordination of ZBRU Traffic 8 3. Major Cost Components 11 Port Charges 11 Clearing and Forwarding Charges 11 Freight Costs 11 4. Total Costs of Transportation 13 Recommendations 13 The Ports of Mombasa and Dar-es-Salaam 13 Clearing and Forwarding Issues 14 Customs Procedures 14 The Railway Systems 15 Marine Services 15 Road Transport 16 Competition in the Road Sector 16 Regional Cooperation 17 Training 17 iii 5. Route Options 19 Uganda 19 Rwanda and Burundi 19 IV Foreword A number of East African countries continue to face rity. Additionally, with cheaper and more secure trans­ severe deterioration in their sea/port, road, rail, and portation, food aid supplies are more certain to reach air transport networks. In the main ports, the infra­ their rural destinations than would otherwise be the structure is so limited and outmoded that it has failed case. The region's exports-mostly bulk agricultural to keep pace with growing traffic demands. As a items-are also more likely to be transported effec­ consequence, the subregional transport system is of­ tively and efficiently, thereby minimizing spoilage ten being used beyond capacity, insecure, costly, and and enhancing incomes. considered unreliable to meet growing national and In view of the widespread economic benefits of regional needs, as well as projected future require­ using least-cost transportation, this study is timely ments. and intuitive. The author's discussion of the major Using data and information based on transport underlying issues in regional transit traffic, as well as costs and issues from the two main sea ports of the major cost components, is detailed and informa­ Mombasa and Dar-es-Saalam to selected destinations, tive. this study presents a comparative cost analysis (with This study finds and recommends that in order to emphasis on total transportation costs to the shipper) make transit traffic more cost effective in East Africa of in-country and intercountry transport costs for and routes and modes more competitive, additional various transit and landlocked countries in East Af­ investment on the basis ofboth existing and projected rica. traffic levels should be made within the framework of In light of the interrelationship between the cost donor-supported regional projects, and coordinated and efficiency ofthe transportation network, and the at that level. This approach reinforces the enormity cost, timeliness, and state of delivery of cargo, espe­ and broad-based nature ofthe problem, as well as the cially agricultural cargo, it is imperative that the ship­ need for cost sharing on an issue that will yield per have access to options for transporting merchan­ collective regional benefit if designed and imple­ dise rather than having to opt for a particular mode mented appropriately. (although it may be more expensive) only because no This report is one in a series ofstudies on Africa's other choice exists. Further, over the past few de­ regional trade and agricultural comparative advan­ cades, the East African region has suffered frequent tage, a joint activity of the USAID Africa Bureau's severe droughts that have threatened national and Food Security and Productivity Unit in the Office of regional food security. Food shortages have been Sustainable Development, Productive Sector Growth further complicated by continued structural grain and Environment Division (AFRISDIPSGE), and the deficits caused by the poor, insecure, and high cost Regional Economic Development Services Office for transport system. East and Southern Africa (REDSO/ESA). With more cost effective and secure modes of transportation, the cost of transporting grain from rural, agricultural regions to cities and other urban Curt Reintsma areas will be cheaper and food affordability could be Division Chief enhanced, thus assuring a key element of food secu- USAIDIAFRISDIPSGE v Acknowledgments We express our gratitude to the many people and We are grateful to senior officials and other organizations who have contributed to and supported employees of relevant transport organizations and this study. associated industry players in the region. Since it is Special thanks to those who provided funding not possible to personally thank every individual, we and formulated this study's terms of reference-the hope that you will accept our sincere gratitude. Bureau for Africa, Office of Sustainable Develop­ For the provision of data on which much of this ment at USAID and USAID/REDSO/ESA in study is based, special thanks to Kenya Railways Nairobi-and Technoserve Inc., who acted as con­ Corporation, Tanzania Railways Corporation, Uganda tract managers. We also wish to specially thank Dr. Railways Corporation, Kenya Ports Authority, and Joe W. Carvalho, policy adviser, USAID/REDSOI Tanzania Harbors Authority. We are grateful to of­ ESA/ANR, who guided the study with his useful ficials of customs departments in the region, clearing comments and suggestions, and whose understanding and forwarding agencies and regional transporters for ofkey issues has been central to this report's success­ their cooperation and valuable information used in ful completion. this study. vii Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations' ACIS Advance Cargo Infonnation Services ABO African Development Bank AFR Bureau for Africa (USAID) AMI Agence Maritime Internationale ANR Office of Agriculture and Natural Resources (REDSO/ESA) BIF Bond in Force BP British Petroleum BUJ Bujumbura CBS Central Bureau of Statistics COO Customs Documentation Officer CFA Clearing & Forwarding Agents CIF Cost, Insurance and Freight CMB Coffee Marketing Board (Uganda) COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa CR Clean Report of Findings CTLA Central Transport Licensing Authority CTL Commercial Transaction Levy DANIDA Danish International Development Agency D&DOs Declaration & Disposal Order DWT Dead Weight Ton EAC East Africa Community EACA East Africa Cooperation Agreement EACL East African Conference Lines EARC East African Railway Corporation EARH East Africa Railways and Harbors EC European Community ECA Economic Commission for Africa EDF European Development Fund EEC European Economic
Recommended publications
  • Central Corridor Transit Transport Facilitation Agency (Ttfa)
    Multi-year Expert Meeting on Transport,Trade Logistics and Trade Facilitation: Transport and logistics innovation towards the review of the Almaty Programme of Action in 2014 22-24 October 2013 CENTRAL CORRIDOR TRANSIT TRANSPORT FACILITATION AGENCY (TTFA) by Ms. Rukia D. Shamte Executive Secretary Central Corridor Transit Transport Facilitation Agency (CCTTFA), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania This expert paper is reproduced by the UNCTAD secretariat in the form and language in which it has been received. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the United Nations. 11/4/2013 CENTRAL CORRIDOR TRANSIT TRANSPORT FACILITATION AGENCY (TTFA) MMulti-MultiultiMulti---YearYear Expert Meeting on Transport, Trade Logistics and Trade Facilitation ---1st Session PPalaisalais des Nations ---Room XXVI ---GenevaGenevaGeneva Geneva, 2222----2424 October 2013 CCTTFA – Rukia Shamte Executive Secretary 4/4/2013 1 Introduction • About the TTFA • Introduction • The Institutional Framework • Scope of the TTFA • Objectives • TTFA Objectives • Organs of the TTFA • TTFA Vision and Mission Statement • The Port of Dar es Salaam & the Central Corridor • Major Challenges at the Central Corridor • Trade Facilitation Initiatives along the Central Corridor 4-Nov-13 2 1 11/4/2013 The TTFA-Introduction •The TTFA is a cooperation of Stakeholders and Governments of Burundi, DRC, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda to promote efficient transit transport systems in the interest of all contracting parties. with a view to make the Central Corridor the most cost- effective to enhance the TTFA countries competitiveness in the global market. •The TTFA was formed in recognition of the need & right of landlocked countries (LLC) to transit trade •The TTFA Agreement underlines the modalities of this cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Growth and Development - Transcending Borders in Africa Introduction - Towards Growth and Development in Africa
    Japan International Cooperation Agency Towards Growth and Development - Transcending Borders in Africa Introduction - Towards Growth and Development in Africa African nations, especially Sub-Saharan African nations, are Relative Proportion of Each Country's Population(2002) struggling against extreme poverty. Having already topped 800 million people, the population of Africa is expected to increase to 1.7 billion by 2050. At the same time, the level of economic development in Africa is rather low compared with that of Asia. Investments in various fields and sectors are essential in order to eliminate the most serious poverty in the world and promote sustainable economic growth in Africa. As there are numerous small independent countries in Africa, © Copyright 2006 SASI Group(University of Sheffield)and Mark many of which are inland, transportation in Africa requires fre- Newman(University of Michigan) quent national border crossings. This imposes extraordinary costs and constitutes a major impediment to economic growth. Therefore, addressing this barrier can reduce transportation cost, as well as promote trade and industry, and regional social Relative Proportion of Each Country's Population(2050) and economic integration. These are essential for economic growth to reduce poverty and achieve, Pro-Poor Growth. JICA has conducted a series of research studies commencing in 2005 to support the development of cross-border transport infra- structure(CBTI). An overall assessment of CBTI and an evalua- tion of CBTI in the Indochina/Mekong Basin subregion was undertaken in the first and second research projects, respective- ly. This investigation, which is the third research project in the series, covers Sub-Saharan Africa and studies the possibilities © Copyright 2006 SASI Group(University of Sheffield)and Mark of JICA assistances for CBTI development in Africa, taking into Newman(University of Michigan) account the previous research results.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi / Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF)
    Republic of Burundi / Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) Burundi Diagnostic Trade Integration Study (DTIS) Update Volume 1 – Main report July 2012 Acknowledgements At the request of the Government of Burundi, the World Bank took the leading role in the preparation of this DTIS Update. The core members of the team were: Ferdinand Bararuzunza (local networks and stakeholder consultations); Olivier Cadot (non-tariff measures); Antoine Coste (trade performance analysis, sectoral case studies); Charles Kunaka and Philippe Lambrecht (trade facilitation and logistics), and Smita Wagh (financial services). The task team leader of the report is Nora Dihel. Background papers and other inputs were also provided by Aurélien Beko (informal sector); Joseph Butoyi (horticultural sector survey); Matthew Harber (trade data analysis); Jean-Pascal Nganou and Calvin Zebaze Djiofack (NTBs); Kabemba Lusinde Wa Lusangi (investment climate and tourism), and Jumaine Hussein (coffee), Ian Mills (regional integration), Ana Margarida Fernandes and Ingo Borchert (data on Burundi’s services trade barriers). Moreover, the analysis in the report greatly benefited from very helpful comments and feedback provided by Paul Brenton, Hannah Messerli, Jacques Morisset, Jean- Pascal Nganou and Barbara Rippel, among others. The DTIS update was elaborated in close cooperation with counterparts in the Burundian government, including the EIF Coordinator Léonard Ntibagirirwa and Youssouf Kone at the Ministry of Trade and Industry, who prepared an evaluation of the implementation of the first Action Matrix, administered the regulatory survey on professional services and provided comments on the results of the DEC Survey on services barriers. The DTIS update team would also like to thank the numerous stakeholders from the public and private sectors who provided helpful insights during the team missions undertaken in 2011 and early 2012, the workshop on preliminary results organized in November 2011 and the validation workshop organized in July 2012 in Bujumbura.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania-Rwanda-Burundi Phase II Dar Es Salaam-Isaka-Kigali/Keza-Musongati Railway Project Study 2
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECT : PHASE II DAR ES SALAAM-ISAKA-KIGALI/KEZA- MUSONGATI RAILWAY PROJECT STUDY COUNTRY: TANZANIA - RWANDA and BURUNDI Date: September 2009 Team Leader: A. MOHAMED, Transport Economist, OINF.2 Members E. MASENGO, Transport Engineer, OINF.2 N. SENOU, Transport Economist , OINF.2 Project Team Division Manager: J. RWAMABUGA, OINF.2 Sector Director : G. MBESHERUBUSA, OINF Regional Director D. GAYE, OREA/OREB A. OUMAROU, Transport Engineer, OINF.2 B. TRAORE, Transport Engineer, OINF.1 P. RUGUMIRE., Transport Engineer, OINF.1 N. KULEMEKA, Socio-economist, OINF.2 Peer Review M. FARAOUN, Financial Analyst, OPSM A. BABALOLA, Transport Engineer, OPSM H. IMAN, Financial Analyst, OPSM M. SALAWOU, Financial Analyst, ONRI M. AJIJO, Transport Economist, ONRI AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND TRA-TUNIS B.P. 323 TUNIS-BELVEDERE 1002 Tel.: (216) 71 333 511 Fax: (216) 71 352 933 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Date: 31 July 2009 The information given hereunder is intended to provide guidance to prospective suppliers, contractors, consultants and all persons interested in the procurement of goods and services for projects approved by the Boards of Directors of the Bank Group. More detailed information can be obtained from the executing agencies of the Borrower and the Donees. 1. COUNTRY AND PROJECT TITLE : Multinational: Tanzania-Rwanda-Burundi Phase II Dar es Salaam-Isaka-Kigali/Keza-Musongati Railway Project Study 2. PROJECT LOCATION : Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi 3. - BORROWER : United Republic of Tanzania - DONEES : Republic of Rwanda and Republic of Burundi 4. EXECUTING AGENCY : Ministry of Infrastructure of Rwanda Boulevard de l’Umuganda B.P. 24 Kigali, Rwanda 5. STUDY DESCRIPTION : The study comprises: (A) Study Services; (B) Technical Assistance Services; (C) Financial Audit Services; and (D) Study Coordination and Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Rwanda FY2017 Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese Grant Aid
    United Republic of Tanzania/ Republic of Rwanda FY2017 Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese Grant Aid Project “The Project for Construction of Rusumo International Bridge and One Stop Border Post Facilities” External Evaluator: Tomoyuki Sho, IC Net Limited 0. Summary The objective of this project is to ease the traffic restrictions and facilitate the border-crossing procedures at the Rusumo border between Rwanda and Tanzania through the reconstruction of the Rusumo International Bridge and the construction of One Stop Border Post (hereinafter referred to as “OSBP1”) facilities, thereby contributing to the smooth and stable logistics and distribution of goods along the Central Corridor. Since the project was consistent with the national development policies and road/transport sector strategies of Rwanda and Tanzania and their development needs at the times of planning and ex-post evaluation, as well as Japan’s aid policy at the time of planning, its relevance is high. The outputs, such as the constructions of a bridge, roads, and border post facilities, had been produced as planned, and the project period and the project cost were both within the plan. Therefore, the efficiency is high. By reconstructing the Rusumo bridge, this project has eased gross weight and speed restrictions for travelling vehicles and enabled large trucks, which could not cross the bridge before, to pass through smoothly. Moreover, owning to the development of the OSBP facilities, the border-crossing procedures based on the OSBP system and the 24-hour operation of the OSBP facilities have been implemented by the time of ex-post evaluation. And the time necessary for customs and border-crossing procedures has been dramatically shortened, and the transportation cost for a cargo for a round trip between Dar es Salaam and Kigali has also been reduced as expected.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Republic of Tanzania Shinyanga
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA SHINYANGA REGIONAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE Joint publication by: NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS (NBS ) AND SHINYANGA REGIONAL COMMISSIONER’S OFFICE CO-ORDINATED BY: MINISTRY OF PLANNING, ECONOMY AND EMPOWERMENT DAR -ES -SALAAM SECOND Edition JULY 2007 i TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................................iv SECTION ONE.....................................................................................................................................1 1.0 LAND, PEOPLE AND CLIMATE.................................................................................................1 1.1 Geographical Location..........................................................................................................1 1.2 Surface Area and Administrative Units ................................................................................1 1.3 Population....................................................................................................................................4 1.4 Climatic Features.........................................................................................................................9 1.5 Drainage ....................................................................................................................................10 1.6 Topography and Vegetation......................................................................................................10 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Development Corridors and Infrastructure Development
    DEVELOPMENT CORRIDORS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT: PRESENTATION Arusha, Tanzania 16 – 20 April 2007 (By SMAK Kaombwe; CDC SDI Project Manager) OBJECTIVE z Presentation of Development Corridors (Spatial Development Initiatives) methodology as a tool to expedite infrastructure Development by emphasizing its economic function BACKGROUND CDC SDI Central Development Corridor (Spatial Dev Initiative): implemented under Rwanda and Tanzania Agreement signed on 14 January 2005. Burundi and DRC (Eastern part) also involved CDCCDC SDISDI COVERAGECOVERAGE Dev Corr SDI Methodology A. Traditional approach: Promoting projects individually or by sectors:, z Difficult to appreciate plans and timing of key inputs from other projects or sectors for success of project, (to show ways to mitigate externally driven risks for potential investors) z Difficult to consistently and clearly prioritize across sectors and countries (for cross-border projects) z Because of above factors, projects take too long to implement WHAT IS SDI VALUE ADDITION? B. SDI Methodology: Projects profiled and promoted as an integrated Business Case: z Clear definition and prioritisation of key or anchor projects z Clear elaboration of projects’ interdependence and need for integration for success and to achieve intended benefits z Facilitate “crowding in” of investors and project financiers around integrated business case: (enables consulting and solving mutual concerns – for quicker investment decision making) WHAT IS SDI VALUE ADDITION? C. SDI Methodology: Projects as drivers of development process: z Large scale private sector economic generator “anchor” projects that support/accelerate the case for… z Strategic investment in infrastructure projects, funded by government, public private sector partnerships or private equity/debt financing, which… z Accelerates the ongoing process of investments in small to medium sized economic generator investment projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Ports As an Enabler of Trade - UNCTAD’S Experience
    Dry ports as an enabler of trade - UNCTAD’s experience by Vincent Valentine, Officer-in-Charge, Transport Section, Trade Logistics Branch, Division on Technology and Logistics, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Challenges Challenges - Seaports Seaside Land side • Increased size of vessels. • Cargo arriving “bunched-up”. • Increased pressure to provide • Increased pressure to provide speedy ship turnaround times. speedy cargo handling • Lack of financial resources to services. invest (deeper approach • Lack of financial resources to channels/berths, wider turning invest in more cargo handling basins etc.). equipment, bigger storage • Increased pressure to be facilities). environmentally sensitive (less • Increased pressure to be water pollution) environmentally sensitive (less noise, air, water and light pollution) Challenges - Inland • 44 landlocked countries in the • The average GDP per world capita in LLDCs is about • 31 classified as LLDCs: 15 in 43% lower than their Africa, 10 in Asia, 2 in Latin neighbouring coastal America and 4 in Central and countries Eastern Europe. • Sixteen are also classified as least developed countries • Transport costs for (LDCs).[1] LLDCs represent an average of 77% of the value of exports.[2] • The costs of international transport of goods can be 50% higher in LLDCs than in transit countries.[3] [1] The Republic of South Sudan is not included in these figures. [2] Infrastructure Consortium for Africa. 2007. Annual Report 2007. [3] Radelet S., Sachs J.D. 1998. Shipping Costs, Manufactured Exports, and Economic Growth, Mimeo. Challenges - Topography Addis Ababa 2.3km Djibouti Mombasa – Kampala 2,300km (rail) – (Kampala 1,300m above sea- 781 km (rail) level) The Djibouti-Addis Ababa Railway There are 79 curves with a radius smaller than 200 metres which seriously limits the carrying capacity of the trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    BIOLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET PN-AAJ-434 .. ... ............ .......... ee ee ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY. BUKOMBE-ISAKA ROAD LINK. TANZANIA; FINAL REPORT PERSONAL AUTHORS - CORPORATE AUTHORS - BERGER (LOUIS) INT. INC. 1981. 20BP. ARC NUMBER - TZ625.76.B496 CONTRACT NUMBER - AID/OTR-C-1788 PROJECT NUMBERS - 6980426 SUBJECT CLASS - DPOOOOOOG148 DESCRIPTORS HIGHWAY PLAIINING ECONOMIC ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION COSTS COST ANALYSIS FEASIBILITY TRANSPORTATION RURAL ROADS TANZANIA HIGHWAYS ROADS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY BUKOMBE-ISAKA ROAD LINK TANZANIA Contract No. AID/OTR-C-1788 Work Order No. 3 Prepared by: LOUIS BERGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 100 Halsted Street East Orange, N.J. 07019 April 1981 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY BUKOMBE-ISAKA ROAD LINK TANZANIA Contract No. AID/OTR-C-1788 Work Order No. 3 Prepared by. LOUIS BERGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 100 Halsted Street East Orange, N.J. 07019 April 1981 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY BUKOMBE-ISAKA ROAD LINK Executive Summary Rwanda and Burundi have heretofore depended on two surface transport routes to the Indian Ocean. These routes (known as the "northern" 0ute through Uganda and Kenya to the port of Mombasa and the "southern" route across Lake Tanganyika and Tanzania to the port of Dar es Salaam) have become unsatisfactory due to considerable difficulties and delays attributable to deteriorated roadways and railroad service, port congestion and inefficient operations, numerous trans­ shipments an(7 border closures. An alternative access route to the Indian Ocean known a'3 the "middle" route, which crosses Tanzania by road to Isaka with a railroad connection to Dar es Salaam, has been proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Dry Port Efficiency in Africa Using Data Envelopment Analysis
    Journal of Transportation Technologies, 2019, 9, 193-203 http://www.scirp.org/journal/jtts ISSN Online: 2160-0481 ISSN Print: 2160-0473 Assessment of Dry Port Efficiency in Africa Using Data Envelopment Analysis Hamadou Tahirou Abdoulkarim1*, Seydou Harouna Fatouma2, Hamadou Tahirou Hassane3 1School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China 2Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, China 3School of Health and Management, Abdou Moumouni Dioffo University, Niamey, Niger How to cite this paper: Abdoulkarim, Abstract H.T., Fatouma, S.H. and Hassane, H.T. (2019) Assessment of Dry Port Efficiency in This work involves the evaluation of dry port competitiveness through analy- Africa Using Data Envelopment Analysis. sis of efficiencies for selected dry ports in Africa. Five dry ports were selected Journal of Transportation Technologies, 9, and analysis carried out over a period of four years. The dry ports considered 193-203. were Mojo and Kality in Ethiopia, Mombasa in Kenya, Isaka in Tanzania and https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2019.92012 Casablanca in Casablanca, Morocco. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was Received: March 23, 2019 applied for this work. Container throughputs for the various ports under Accepted: April 8, 2019 consideration were used as the output variable for the data analysis model, Published: April 11, 2019 while the number of reach stackers, the number of tractors, the number of Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and forklifts and the size of the dry port were used as the input variables. From Scientific Research Publishing Inc. the results, the Mombasa dry port was found to be the most efficient with an This work is licensed under the Creative average score of approximately 1 over the period under consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Country Profile Report
    i | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ i LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................. vi COUNTRY FACT SHEET ................................................................................................... vii LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... x 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 1 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Objectives of the Report ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5. Structure of the Report ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Transport
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT Public Disclosure Authorized PROPOSED TANZANIA INTERMODAL AND RAIL PROJECT (TIRP) REHABILITATION OF RAILWAY LINE INCLUDING TRACK RENEWAL AND BRIDGES UPGRADING BETWEEN DAR ES SALAAM AND ISAKA ALONG THE CORE CORRIDOR TO MWANZA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT Prepared by Juma Kayonko, MSc Registered Environmental Expert (NEMC/EIA 0162), P.O. Box 30, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mobile: (+255) 0787/0754 616 700 Email: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized NOVEMBER 2013 REHABILITATION OF RAILWAY LINE INCLUDING TRACK RENEWAL AND BRIDGES UPGRADING BETWEEN DAR ES SALAAM AND ISAKA ALONG THE CORE CORRIDOR TO MWANZA ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Juma Kayonko, MSc Registered Environmental Expert (NEMC/EIA 0162), P.O. Box 30, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mobile: (+255) 0787/0754 616700 Email: [email protected] NOVEMBER 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents ______________________________________________________ ii List of Tables __________________________________________________________ vi List of Figures _________________________________________________________ vii Abbreviations and Acronyms ________________________________________ viii Acknowledgement ____________________________________________________ ix Executive Summary ____________________________________________________ x Chapter 1: Introduction ________________________________________________ 1 1.1 General Background
    [Show full text]