DOCSLIB.ORG

This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Mellor, Emma L Title: Does natural foraging niche influence captive animal health and welfare? General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Does natural foraging niche influence captive animal health and welfare? Emma Louise Mellor A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Health Sciences Bristol Veterinary School September 2020 64,325 words Abstract Understanding the basis for differences in how species typically respond to captivity is fundamental for addressing welfare-relevant management problems created by captivity. This can be achieved by formal cross-species comparisons and testing hypotheses for how species-typical ecology and biology might affect their representatives’ typical captive response. My PhD examined potential foraging-niche related risk factors, i.e. the way a species uses its habitat and resources in relation to gaining food, for two different types of welfare-relevant management problem across three taxonomic groups. Using phylogenetic comparative methods to control for species non-independence due to shared ancestry, I examined relationships between hunting behaviour and route-tracing severity across zoo- housed Carnivora; and determined whether wild food-search or -handling behaviours predict the prevalence of feather-damaging behaviour and other stereotypic behaviour in pet Psittaciformes. Across zoo-housed Lemuriformes, foraging niche was just one of three aspects of species-typical biology assessed for potential predictive effects on a second type of management problem: susceptibility to weight gain. Taking an epidemiological approach, I also explored several individual-level potential demographic and environmental risk factors for susceptibility to weight gain across a subset of four Lemuriform species. Naturally relying on extensive food-handling was revealed as risk factor for feather-damaging behaviour across Psittaciformes, and adaptations to unpredictable wild food resources might be a risk factor for weight gain in Lemuriformes. Regarding the latter, epidemiological analyses revealed several demographic risk factors and one environmental one in male lemurs (being housed with only fixed climbing structures). Based on my results, I make practical recommendations to help address these specific management problems; describe fundamental, collection-management benefits this approach yields, by identifying types of species less-suited to captivity; and detail areas for future research, with the overall aim of improving wellbeing of thousands of animals across many species. i Acknowledgements Where to start? This might have my name on it, but this sort of thing is never done in isolation and represents input from many people to whom I am incredibly grateful. First, my thanks go to my fantastic supervisors Mike Mendl, Innes Cuthill and Georgia Mason for their endless support, questioning, patience, and invaluable advice. During a visit to another university, a researcher there summed you up perfectly: “hell’uva supervisory team” (best said in broadest South Western). I feel privileged to have you as my supervisors, and you’re fantastic role models. Thanks also for your continued support, keeping me in work doing what I adore. I also wish to thank Sarah Collins, who I am pretty sure has little idea of how her encouragement during my undergraduate years influenced me and the path I’ve taken. And I must also thank Ben Brilot, as without his idea of making the abstract I supplied for my PhD interview a mini-poster rather than plain ol’ text, I very much doubt the outcome would have been even half as successful. I also wish to thank fellow lab mates at Bristol Vet School, especially Vikki Neville, Marco Ramirez and Melissa Smith, for their company during this bonkers shared experience. From the Mason Lab past and present, my thanks particularly to Carole Fureix and Andrea Polanco, and to Miranda Bandeli for sharing with me the beast that is the carnivore database. I am grateful also to Heather McDonald Kinkaid for allowing me to use her data when it all went horribly wrong, and for answering my endless questions about her own work. And thanks to the wonderful human being that is María Díez-León, both for the mutual geeky interests (go P cats!) and her friendship. My thanks also to Yvonne van Zeeland for her valuable advice on the parrot side of things. For their advice on and support for my lemur project my thanks to: Christoph Schwitzer; Christie Eddie and the rest of the AZA Prosimian TAG; Amy Plowman and the rest of the BIAZA Research Committee; and Sarah Zehr. For taking time to read and feedback on various sections of this thesis: Sally Sherwen, Mark Puttick, Jamie Ahloy Dallaire, Sean Nee, Hafiz ii Maherali, Jason Watters, Olivia Mellor and John. And for their assistance with my lemur survey, without which I would probably still be coding data, I am grateful to Shelley Jackman, Georgia Dacombe and Rachel Brown. For their expertise in skills I am woefully lacking I need to thank the following: Elise Shepard, Paola Lunetta, Matteo Montagna, Alessia Maina, Stefan Pinkert, Claudia Serien, Suzanne Held, Christina Rohe, Laura Rodriguez Arco, and Rogelio Rodriguez Lopez for assisting with the Parrot Survey translations. I am grateful to Jack Hughes for his climate know-how, and to Miquel Vall-Llosera and Gustavo Paterno for generously providing some R code – along with an idiot’s guide of to how to use it – and Vikki for her assistance when I still came unstuck. Thanks also to Laszlo Talas for his help with mixed models. I am very grateful to the University of Bristol for providing me with my PhD studentship and research training fund. For further financial support and helping me attend various conferences over the years, I also need to thank ASAB, the Arthur Hosier Bequest, and the University of Bristol’s Alumni Foundation. For providing data, thanks to Agnieszka Sergiel and Ulrica Alhot for their captive carnivore data. Also thanks to all my wonderful ‘lemur’ zoos for data and photographs of their animals: Adelaide Zoo, Al Bustan Zoological Centre, United Arab Emirates, Alameda Wildlife Park, Alligator Farm Zoological Park, Aquazoo Friesland, Audubon Zoo, Barcelona Zoo, Birmingham Zoo, Cameron Park, Cango Wildlife Ranch, Central Florida Zoo, Cheyenne Mountain Zoo, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, Duke Lemur Center, Furuvik Zoo, Givskud Zoo – Zootopia, Greater Vancouver Zoo, Hannover Zoo, Hemsley Conservation Centre, Honolulu Zoo, Kaliningrad Zoo, Kosice Zoo, Lake Superior Zoological Society, Lakeland Wildlife Oasis, Lehigh Valley Zoo, Lemur Conservation Foundation, Little Rock Zoo, Minsk Zoo, Nashville Zoo, National Zoological Park, Nikolaev Zoo, Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium, Paignton Zoo, Parc Animalier D'auvergne, Parc Merveilleux, Parco Faunistico Valcobra, Parken Zoo, Peak Wildlife Park, Perm Zoo, Point Defiance Zoo & Aquarium, Randers iii Regnskov, Rolling Hills Zoo, Rotterdam Zoo, Santa Fe College Teaching Zoo, Śląski Ogród Zoologiczny in Chorzów, The Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, Twycross Zoo and the East Midlands Zoological Society, Wellington Zoo Trust, Zoo Bratislava, Zoo de Lyon, Zoo Decin, Zoo Landau, Zoo Vienna (Tiergarten Schönbrunn), Zoo Wuppertal, Zoologischer Garten Schwerin, and all others that contributed. And lastly many, many thanks to my family for putting up with increasing forgetfulness (several birthdays, one wedding anniversary [mine]), grumpiness, general scattiness, and my working during weekends and occasional family events over these past few years. To my parents and in-laws, special thanks for all the childcare over this past year. John – you are the absolute best, and ‘thanks’ seems too little for all your love, support, cooking, and ability to present coffee, wine, chocolate and/or other snacks at just the right time. You’re amazing and I love you. Eve, thanks for forcing me to become more efficient. You may have made this even harder, but I wouldn’t change a thing. Plus, I love that you can correctly identify lemurs and parrots aged two. Carnivores are a work in progress (in fairness, they have pretty diverse morphologies. Maybe by the time she’s three?). And of course, to Hamish – aka Hambo-fandango – who almost, but not quite, saw the whole thing from start to finish, and who I miss terribly. iv Author’s declaration I declare that the work in this dissertation was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the University's Regulations and Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes and that it has not been submitted for any other academic award. Except where indicated by specific reference in the text, the work is the candidate's own work. Work done in collaboration with, or with the assistance of, others, is indicated as such.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure-Function Relationship of the Lung of the Australian Sea Lion Neophoca Cinerea
    The Structure-Function Relationship of the Lung of the Australian Sea Liont Neophoc e clnerea by Anthony Nicholson B.V.Sc. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhY' Department of PathologY' UniversitY of Adelaide February 1984 Frontispiece: Group of four adull female Australian sea lions basking in the sun at Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island. ËF:æ: oo',,, 'å¡ -*-d, l--- --a - .¡* É--- .-\tb.<¡- <} b' \ .ltl '' 4 qÙ CONTENTS Page List of Figures X List of Tables xi Abstract XIV Declaration XV Acknowledge m ents I I. Introduction Chapter \ I I.I Classification of Marine Mammals I I.2', Distribution of Australian Pinnipeds 2 I.3 Diving CaPabilitY 3 PhYsiologY 1.4 Diving 4 Cardiovascular SYstem ' l'.4.I B I.4.2 OxYgen Stores 1l L.4.3 BiochemicalAdaPtations L3 I.4.4 PulmonarYFunction I.4.5 Effects oi Incteased Hydrostatic Pressure T6 l-8 1.5 SummarY and Aims 20 Chapter 2. Materials and Methods 20 ?.I Specimen Collection 2I 2.2 Lung Fixation 2I 2.3 Lung Votume Determination 22 2.4 Parasite Collection and Incubation 22 2.5 M icroscoPY 22 2.5.I Light MicroscoPY Electron Microscopy 23 2..5.2 Trãnsmission 23 2.5.3 Scanning ElectronMicroscopy 25 Chapter 5. Norm al ResPiratorY Structure 25 t.r Introduction 25 Mam maI Respiratory System 3.2 Terrestrial 25 1.2.I MacroscoPtc 27 3.2.2 MicroscoPic 27 SYstem 3.3 Pinniped ResPiratorY 27 3.3.I MacroscoPic 28 3.3.2 MicroscoPic 3I 3.4 Results 3I 1.4.L MacroscoPic 32 3.4.2 MicroscoPic 7B 3.5 Discussion 7B 3.5.I MacroscoPtc 79 3.5.2 MicroscoPic 92 3.6 SummarY IV Page Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ORNITHOLOGIST VOLUME 44 - PARTS 1&2 - November - 2019
    SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ORNITHOLOGIST VOLUME 44 - PARTS 1&2 - November - 2019 Journal of The South Australian Ornithological Association Inc. In this issue: Variation in songs of the White-eared Honeyeater Phenotypic diversity in the Copperback Quailthrush and a third subspecies Neonicotinoid insecticides Bird Report, 2011-2015: Part 1, Non-passerines President: John Gitsham The South Australian Vice-Presidents: Ornithological John Hatch, Jeff Groves Association Inc. Secretary: Kate Buckley (Birds SA) Treasurer: John Spiers FOUNDED 1899 Journal Editor: Merilyn Browne Birds SA is the trading name of The South Australian Ornithological Association Inc. Editorial Board: Merilyn Browne, Graham Carpenter, John Hatch The principal aims of the Association are to promote the study and conservation of Australian birds, to disseminate the results Manuscripts to: of research into all aspects of bird life, and [email protected] to encourage bird watching as a leisure activity. SAOA subscriptions (e-publications only): Single member $45 The South Australian Ornithologist is supplied to Family $55 all members and subscribers, and is published Student member twice a year. In addition, a quarterly Newsletter (full time Student) $10 reports on the activities of the Association, Add $20 to each subscription for printed announces its programs and includes items of copies of the Journal and The Birder (Birds SA general interest. newsletter) Journal only: Meetings are held at 7.45 pm on the last Australia $35 Friday of each month (except December when Overseas AU$35 there is no meeting) in the Charles Hawker Conference Centre, Waite Road, Urrbrae (near SAOA Memberships: the Hartley Road roundabout). Meetings SAOA c/o South Australian Museum, feature presentations on topics of ornithological North Terrace, Adelaide interest.
    [Show full text]
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292768999 Marine and coastal ecosystems Article · January 2003 CITATIONS READS 44 81 3 authors, including: Andrew Cooke Resolve SARL 9 PUBLICATIONS 184 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Artisanal & small scale mining and biodiversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Andrew Cooke on 17 August 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. MADAGASCAR A Guide to Marine Biodiversity Andrew Cooke with photographs by Jürg Brand Published by Wildlife Conservation Society Villa Ifanomezantsoa, face II A 78 D Soavimbahoaka Antananarivo Madagascar Editions RESOLVE Resolve Conseil Immeuble Assist Ivandry 2ème étage Antananarivo Madagascar BP 8352 - Tel: (261 20) 22 030 90 E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Text: Andrew Cooke Photos: Jürg Brand Contributors (in order of first contribution in the text): Blaise Cooke, Johann Lutjeharms, James Stapley, Chlöe Webster, Faratiana Ratsifandrihamanana, Minosoa Ravololoharinjara, Rupert Cook, Bernard Séret, Mathieu Le Corre, Howard Rosenbaum, Olivier Behra, Rachel Graham. Photos: Jürg Brand (J.B.), Andrew Cooke (A.C.), Rupert Cook (R.C.), Chloë Webster (C.W.), Charlotte De Fontaubert (C.DF.), Martin Mendez (M.M), Matthew McDavitt (M.McD.), Peter Hans (P.H.), Pete Morris (P.M.), Frank Hawkins (F.H.), Damon Stanwell-Smith (D.S-S.), Nathalie McNear (N.M.), Richard Seaman (R.S.), David Pearce (D.P.), Mathieu Le Corre (M.LC.), Jürgen Freund (J.F.), Tommi Sandberg (T.S.), WCS (Wildlife Conservation Society), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature), Aquaterre, NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration), Blue Ventures Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Abundances in Primary and Secondary Growths in Papua New Guinea: a Preliminary Assessment
    Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science Vol.3 (4):373-388, 2010 Research Article Bird abundances in primary and secondary growths in Papua New Guinea: a preliminary assessment Kateřina Tvardíková1 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ- 370 05 České Budějovice. Email: <[email protected] Abstract Papua New Guinea is the third largest remaining area of tropical forest after the Amazon and Congo basins. However, the growing intensity of large-scale slash-and-burn agriculture and logging call for conservation research to assess how local people´s traditional land-use practices result in conservation of local biodiversity, of which a species-rich and diverse component is the avian community. With this in mind, I conducted a preliminary survey of birds in small-scale secondary plots and in adjacent primary forest in Wanang Conservation Area in Papua New Guinea. I used mist-netting, point counts, and transect walks to compare the bird communities of 7-year-old secondary growth, and neighboring primary forest. The preliminary survey lasted 10 days and was conducted during the dry season (July) of 2008. I found no significant differences in summed bird abundances between forest types. However, species richness was higher in primary forest (98 species) than in secondary (78 species). The response of individual feeding guilds was also variable. Two habitats differed mainly in presence of canopy frugivores, which were more abundant (more than 80%) in primary than in secondary forests. A large difference (70%) was found also in understory and mid-story insectivores. Species occurring mainly in secondary forest were Hooded Butcherbird (Cracticus cassicus), Brown Oriole (Oriolus szalayi), and Helmeted Friarbird (Philemon buceroides).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Rufford Foundation Final Report Congratulations on the completion of your project that was supported by The Rufford Foundation. We ask all grant recipients to complete a Final Report Form that helps us to gauge the success of our grant giving. The Final Report must be sent in word format and not PDF format or any other format. We understand that projects often do not follow the predicted course but knowledge of your experiences is valuable to us and others who may be undertaking similar work. Please be as honest as you can in answering the questions – remember that negative experiences are just as valuable as positive ones if they help others to learn from them. Please complete the form in English and be as clear and concise as you can. Please note that the information may be edited for clarity. We will ask for further information if required. If you have any other materials produced by the project, particularly a few relevant photographs, please send these to us separately. Please submit your final report to [email protected]. Thank you for your help. Josh Cole, Grants Director Grant Recipient Details Your name Prosper Umuntunundi ‘Non-primate mammalian wildlife abundance Project title and distribution in Africa’s youngest national park — Gishwati - Mukura NP in Rwanda’. RSG reference 20936-1 Reporting period 13/1/2017-13/1/2018 Amount of grant £4962 Your email address [email protected] Date of this report 15th May 2018 1. Please indicate the level of achievement of the project’s original objectives and include any relevant comments on factors affecting this.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa and Namibia, 20 July - 12 August 2017
    South Africa and Namibia, 20 July - 12 August 2017. VLADIMIR DINETS This trip was an introduction to Africa for my wife and daughter; the latter was two and a half years old at the time and enjoyed it a lot. We had three weeks to kill while a container with our stuff was traveling from New Jersey to our new home in Okinawa. We started from Cape Town, drove east to Hermanus and then north to Oranjemund, flew to Windhoek, briefly explored a few locations up to Etosha, returned to Windhoek and spent one day and two nights in Johannesburg. In 2017, Cape Town area, Namaqualand and Namibia were experiencing a major drought. Full moon was on August 7; that made finding small mammals difficult during the Namibian part of the trip. I had six Sherman traps and caught only twelve rodents of two species (two pygmy mice in the far south and Namaqua rock rats almost everywhere else). Bats seemed absent with few exceptions. I saw almost a hundred species, all but four of which I had seen before (see my 2008 trip report), and removed a few species from my “better view much desired” list. South Africa Simon’s Town is a convenient base for exploring the area; M4 south from it is a good place to look for chacma baboons, while humpback whales are often feeding offshore (we saw one, and heard a few while scuba diving). Watch for South African fur seals, too. Four-striped grass mice (locally called “field mice”) were abundant in wooded parts of penguin colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Ecology of Antipodes Island Parakeet ( Cyanoramphus Unicolor) and Reischek's Parakeet ( C
    Aspects of the ecology of Antipodes Island Parakeet ( Cyanoramphus unicolor) and Reischek's Parakeet ( C. novaezelandiae hochstetten) on Antipodes Island, October - November 1995 TERRY C. GREENE Science and Research Unit, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68-908, Newton, Auckland, New Zealad ABSTRACT Aspects of the ecology of the Antipodes Island Parakeet (Cyanoramphus unicolor) and Reischek's Parakeet (C. novaezelandiae hochstettq were examined at the Antipodes Islands during October and November 1995. Significant differences in diet were detected between the species. Leaves of large tussocks formed the majority of the diet forhtipodes Island Parakeets, whereas tussock flowers comprised much of the diet of Reischek's Parakeet. Significant differences in the diet of these species between this and previous studies were thought to reflect temporal variations in food availability rather than any fundamental shift in dietary preferences. Observations were made of both parakeet species scavenging on bird corpses. Antipodes Island Parakeets were also recorded killing and eating Grey-backed Storm Petrels (Oceanites nereis). One Antipodes Island Parakeet nest was located; clutch size, physical characteristics of the nest and of behaviour during incubation are described. KEYWORDS: Antipodes Island Parakeet, Cyanorampbus unicolor, Reischek's Parakeet, Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae hochstetteri, Antipodes Islands, diet, predation INTRODUCTION Two parakeet species of the genus Cyanorampbus (subfamily: Psittacinae) occur sympatrically on the subantarctic Antipodes Islands. The parakeets form a distinct and significant part of an avifauna otherwise dominated by seabirds. The Antipodes Island Parakeet (Cyanoramphus unicolor) is the largest species of its genus and is endemic to the island group. Reischek's Parakeet (C. novaezelandiae hochstetteri) is also endemic to the Antipodes Islands, and is one of four other subspecies of the nominate Red-crowned Parakeet (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Peru: from the Cusco Andes to the Manu
    The critically endangered Royal Cinclodes - our bird-of-the-trip (all photos taken on this tour by Pete Morris) PERU: FROM THE CUSCO ANDES TO THE MANU 26 JULY – 12 AUGUST 2017 LEADERS: PETE MORRIS and GUNNAR ENGBLOM This brand new itinerary really was a tour of two halves! For the frst half of the tour we really were up on the roof of the world, exploring the Andes that surround Cusco up to altitudes in excess of 4000m. Cold clear air and fantastic snow-clad peaks were the order of the day here as we went about our task of seeking out a number of scarce, localized and seldom-seen endemics. For the second half of the tour we plunged down off of the mountains and took the long snaking Manu Road, right down to the Amazon basin. Here we traded the mountainous peaks for vistas of forest that stretched as far as the eye could see in one of the planet’s most diverse regions. Here, the temperatures rose in line with our ever growing list of sightings! In all, we amassed a grand total of 537 species of birds, including 36 which provided audio encounters only! As we all know though, it’s not necessarily the shear number of species that counts, but more the quality, and we found many high quality species. New species for the Birdquest life list included Apurimac Spinetail, Vilcabamba Thistletail, Am- pay (still to be described) and Vilcabamba Tapaculos and Apurimac Brushfnch, whilst other montane goodies included the stunning Bearded Mountaineer, White-tufted Sunbeam the critically endangered Royal Cinclodes, 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Peru: From the Cusco Andes to The Manu 2017 www.birdquest-tours.com These wonderful Blue-headed Macaws were a brilliant highlight near to Atalaya.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia: from the Wet Tropics to the Outback Custom Tour Trip Report
    AUSTRALIA: FROM THE WET TROPICS TO THE OUTBACK CUSTOM TOUR TRIP REPORT 4 – 20 OCTOBER 2018 By Andy Walker We enjoyed excellent views of Little Kingfisher during the tour. www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | TRIP REPORT Australia: From the Wet Tropics to the Outback, October 2018 Overview This 17-day customized Australia group tour commenced in Cairns, Queensland, on the 4th of October 2018 and concluded in Melbourne, Victoria, on the 20th of October 2018. The tour included a circuit around the Atherton Tablelands and surroundings from Cairns, a boat trip along the Daintree River, and a boat trip to the Great Barrier Reef (with snorkeling), a visit to the world- famous O’Reilly’s Rainforest Retreat in southern Queensland after a short flight to Brisbane, and rounded off with a circuit from Melbourne around the southern state of Victoria (and a brief but rewarding venture into southern New South Wales). The tour connected with many exciting birds and yielded a long list of eastern Australian birding specialties. Highlights of our time in Far North Queensland on the Cairns circuit included Southern Cassowary (a close male with chick in perfect light), hundreds of Magpie Geese, Raja Shelduck with young, Green and Cotton Pygmy Geese, Australian Brushturkey, Orange-footed Scrubfowl, Brown Quail, Squatter Pigeon, Wompoo, Superb, and perfect prolonged dawn- light views of stunning Rose-crowned Fruit Doves, displaying Australian Bustard, two nesting Papuan Frogmouths, White-browed Crake, Bush and Beach Stone-curlews (the latter
    [Show full text]