DOCSLIB.ORG

Fcin Ncn-Ünd Iwådn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fcin Ncn-Ünd Iwådn United States Bankruptcy Court for thet DISTRICT Ot HAWAII Ca$e number ¡,t*nown¡ ,! .., ,, Chapter 1 lJ Cneck ¡f this an amended filing Official Form 201 Woüu¡ntary Fetíttçn¡ fCIn Ncn-ünd iwådn¡ats FälËnq for ËSanlqnuptev 4t16 lf rn ore space is needed, attâch a separats sheet to this fotm._on the top of any a_dditional pages, wr¡te the debtor's For ¡nformation, narne and case number (if known). more a separate documont, lnstructions for Bankruptèy Èo,rnis for Non-tndìv"¡du'atsi, is åoãirunru. 1. Oebtor's name Hawaii lsland All otlrer names debtor used in the last I years lnclude any assumed DBA lsland Air names, trade names and doing lrusrhess Ðs names J Debtor'$ federal Ëmployer ldentification Number (ElN) 99-01 98708 4. nebtor's address Principal place of business llJlailing âddross, if d¡fferent from principal place of business 550 Paiea Street Suite ?36 l-lonol ul¡r, tJ f 968- q _1" Nunrber, Street, City, State & ZlÈ Òôde P.O llox, Nu¡nber, Street, Crty, Släie & llp Cooe Honolulu ' Locatôon of prlncipal assets, if rlifferent front pr¡ncipal County place of business Nrirltrei, Siieet, City, State A Z-iÞ Òoclu S. Debtor'swcbslte(L,RL) www.islarrdair.çç¡l.l (ì, Tyflo of ctebtor W Corporation (inclucling L¡mitecj Liâbility Conrpany (Lt-C)ancl Limited Liability Pa¡lnership (l-t-p)) [-] Partnership (excluding LLp) IJ Oth<:r. Specify: Iiiir;il,¡i l:or nr 20'ì Volurlir¿¡y frrrl.il.joir 1Ìrr r\ori,itrJiviijuals l.:iÌlirr¡:i foi l;S.arrlirrr¡ef:cy ûiì(Jc 1 U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Hawaii #17-01078 Dkt # 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 19 [)BDlor {qyvgii [sland Air, tnc. Case nurnbcr (ìt kilawa) Niìr ì c 7 Describe debtor's bus¡rìÇ'{rs A. Clreciç olre: Ü Health Carc Br.rsìness (as defined in 11 LJ.$.Ö, g 101(Z7A)) ü SìngleAssel Real Estate (as defineci in i1 U.S C. S 101(S1B)) F Railroad (as ciefined in 11 U.S.C. S 101(44)) Ü Stoclrbroker (as defined in 11 U,S,0. S 101(b3A)) Ü tomrnodity I3roKer (as defined in 11 U.S.C. g 101(6)) D Cleoring Bank (as cjefined in 11 U.S.C, S 781(g)) ffil None ot the above B. Ohock atl that apply Ü l-ax-exempt entity (as described in 26 U S.C g501) fJ lnvestnrent company, inÇluding hedge funcl or poofed investmentvehìcle (as defÌned ¡n 1g U.S.C. g80a-3) I lnveshnentacivisor (as definecl in 1S U.S.C. Sg0b-2(ax11)) C. NAICS (No|th Arrerican lndu$try Çlassificati<¡n System) 4-digit code that best d€scrinres deblar See .l¡l1p:1/www..U9ç9_UI1t,S-g-V/|q u_t:d¡gi]!:n_e-tigml-. ssoci€tioO1¡.Aics-cocjes. 481 Uncler which chapter of the ()l¡ecl< one: Bankruptcy Çode is tlìe 'z debtor filing? l-.ì Chapter fJ Chapter 9 M Chapter 11. Chack âlt ttrat appty il Debtofs aggregête noncontingent l¡qu¡dated debts (exclucling clebts owed to insiclers or affrLates) are less than $2,566,050 (amolrnt subject to adjustment on 4/01/10 and every 3 years afler thal) n l-he debtor is a small trusiness clebtor as cletined in 1l U.S.C. g 101(51D) lf the debtor is a sÍlrall business debtor, attach the most recent balance $heet, statenìerlt ofoperations, cash-flow staten'ìent, and federal inçome tax return or if all of these cJocurnents ci<¡ not exist, follow the procedure in 11 U S.0. S 111CI(f )(B) n A t:lan is lreing fileci with this petition n Acce¡rtances oÍ the plan were solicitecJ prepeÌ¡tion t'ronl onc or mote classes of oreclitors. in aoÇordance with 1'l tJ,S.C, S 1126(b). n The; cjebtor is requìreci to file periodic reports (for exarnpie, 101( ând 10Q) with the Securities ancl l-xchange Comntission accorcJing to S 13 or 15{d) oi the Se0urities Exchange AÇt of 1934. f:jle the allâoYrme/it to Voluntary Petition for Nonlnclivitluals FÌling for Banl<ru¡.>tcy under Chapter 11 (Official Form 20'14) with this fonrr. n Ì'he cjeblor is a shell conrf)any as cjeflrrecj in the SecLl¡itjes ËxÇh¿ìnge Act of lg34 lìLlle 12b-2. lJ Chapter tz I Werr: banl<ruptcy ¡:rior l&T ruo 0a$es filerJ by or ¿ìgâinst the cit:t¡tor withirr tho last B l-.1 Ycs yea rs ? lf rnc¡re th¿ln 2 <:ase,.s, alt¡lr.;lt ¡¡ ecpa râte lr:)i. DistrìÇt When 0as,e nLrnlber l.l)istrict Whr-:n C¡¡s:r¡ trl.rfil¡er' 'l ù. Are ;lrry h;lrrhrupft:y (;¿ìssf. I!,ï lrlr: ¡rcrrdirri.¡ or being filerl by a l"rr.ls iiless; t)artn$r or ;ìft 1,..1 yr,;s. ;*lfil ial.e¿ ol' thê il(.)'pìbr? l..isiI ilil r:i¡si:s lf nrotc ih¿ì¡ì i iìlìíì(.ìlì il {j(,ìi.)íltiìlrÌ liiìl i.-lr,rb ior i(ttlafionshilr I lis¡tr i¡:l jL.ji.ìll:te (.;(lÉrì | t, r'i' lIlo$rr'l { )lit{;lìi I t:,r¡'i lìl) Ì \loiltll.iìi,r,j,i;iiliof! i'iit i,toi¡-ii;¡jiviriLriilr, iiiliiri¡ iiir i-Ì;,¿rrltiui.rl:l;v lliì({(j I U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Hawaii #17-01078 Dkt # 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 2 of 19 l)ebtor Hawai 'ñsiie ilstan{_Ail, I nc Case nur¡ber (it knon'n) 11, Why is the caçe fíled in Çheck all thal auply this district? Delrtor has had its dornicile' principal place of business, 0r principal assets in this district I'or 180 cfays ¡rnmecì¡ately precedingthedateof th¡spefitionorforalongerpartof such lS0daystha¡inanyotherdistrict. u A banl(rup(cy case conÇerning clebtor's affiliate, general partnet, or parlnersh¡p is pending Ín this dishict. 12. Does the dêbtor ewn or ffil ¡¡o have possossion of any Answer below properly reâl property or porsonal If Yes. for each that needs immediâte ãttention. Attach acld¡tional streeis if needed. property that necds imnrediato attention? Why does tlìe propsrty need immediate âttention? (Check att lhat appty.l lt poses fl or is alleged to Poso a threat of imminent and identjfiable hazard lo public heatth or safety Whal is the hazard? I lt needs to be physically secured o¡-protected from the lveather, incltrdes perishalrle [.lt goocis or assets thal could quickly deteriorãte or lose value without attent¡on (for ' example,i livestock, seasonal gaods, n19at, claity, produce, or securities-relatecl assets or olher optians) H other Where is the prope¡ty? Number, Street, Ciiy, State & Ztp Code ls the property insured? fl ruo [f yes, lnsurance agency Contact nanre Pho¡re ffi Statistica I arrd administrative infornlation 13. Debtor's estimation of Clwolt one: available funds W Funds will be availahle for clistributìon to unsecured creditors. fl Afte¡ any a(rrnin¡strat¡ve expell$es âro pa¡d, no futlds will be available to unsecured creclitors 'l.4. Estimâtçd nur¡rber of ü 1.4e ñ r,ooo-s,ooo [-l as,oor .oo,ooo crodftoÌ$ lllso.se [f sool-ro,ooo lf so.t)or -t oo,ooo lJ roo-lgs fl 1o,oo1 .2b,ooo lf fvlore than1O0,00O w ¿oo-ees 'i lìstimated 5. Assets lJ $;o - $so,ooo lf $t,ooo,oor - $ì10 nriilion lì-l gsoo,ooo,or)'l $1 bilìon i:l $so,ool $1oo,ooo Nl Í;lo,o0o,oot - $50 n-rilìion lll $r,ooo,ooo.oo't - $i1o iriu¡oìr l.J $roo,ool - $5oo,ooo l,l $so,OOO,0O't , $100 nriilion lll $t o,ooo,ooo,oo l - $so triltion Ü $soo,o0l - nritfion $'t l-l S;too,rroO,oo't .$boO rniilron lll tt¿ore than $50 trillron 'l(i. Fstirnatocl liabilìties l.-l $o ., , $so,ooo [] $l,ooo,ool $10 rniilion l-l $soo,ooc¡,001 , {ì.j biltion [l $so,oc¡r $1oo,ooo lH $to,oo0,iloi - $S0 rnillio¡r [] $l ,00o,ooo,o0 j . g 10 tritf iorr Ë $1oo,oo'l - $soo,ooo [^] $50,000.00 I -$100 nliltion l-l sto,ooo,oot),00'1 , ll;50 biuioì.ì l""l $500.001 - tj'ì nriilion l "l r;100,000 001 - ljl10i) rni[íorr l"--l ir¡orc thon $liL) triilioil (.rìt .ì t)iiili;,ll I i:ti I \/()1i.1ìlí:rv i:'i;l.il.joil iir l\1¡.rii-lr¡iJi'L¡irlurrl: l iliriii ioi-ì:i..ririii.il.:,Í.r::r., ¡r; ,,-1, ì U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Hawaii #17-01078 Dkt # 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 3 of 19 D(] bÌ0r Hawaji_ lqlan<l A¡r, lnc. Casc rìumÞer (il krcwil.\ Nonro W ¡goleslly Retiçr, Dectaration, anr! Signatures WARNING * Bânkruptcy fiaud is a seriouÐ crirne. Making a false statement in conne-çtjon with a bankruptcy case can resuit in fines up to $s00,000 or inìpr¡iìonment for years, up ta 20 or both l s u s c g{ì J s2, 1 341, 1 51 9, ancr 3571. 17. Declaration and sigr16¡[¡¡ç. of authorized The deþtot requests relief in accorclance with the chapter of title 11, United States Code, specifìed in this petition rêpre$entative of debtor I have been authorized to file this petition on behalf of the debtor. f have examined thê pelition information in this and have a reasonable betief thât the information ìs trued and correct I declare under penaìty of ury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AAPTP Project 05-02: Fuel Resistant Sealers and Binders for HMA Airfield Pavements
    AAPTP Project 05-02: Fuel Resistant Sealers and Binders for HMA Airfield Pavements Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program (AAPTP) FINAL REPORT Submitted by: Douglas I. Hanson AMEC Earth and Environmental Dr. Robert E. Boyer Airport Pavement Consultant Dr. Gayle King GHK, Inc Atish Nadkarni AMEC Earth and Environmental April 30, 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This report has been prepared under the Airport Asphalt Pavement Technology Program (AAPTP). Funding is provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Cooperative Agreement Number 04-G-038. Dr. David Brill is the Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative and a Program Manager in FAA Technology R & D Branch at the William J. Hughes Technical Center. Mr. Monte Symons served as the Project Director for this project. The AAPTP and the FAA thank the Project Technical Panel that willingly gave of their expertise and time for the development of this report. They were responsible for the oversight and the technical direction. The names of the individuals on the Technical Panel are as follows: 1. David Brill 2. David Hein 3. Jack Youcheff 4. Michael Moore DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented within. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views and policies of the Federal Aviation Administration. The report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. Neither the authors not the United States Government endorse products or manufacturers. Company or equipment manufacturer’s names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the purpose of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Regional
    3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter of the Kemper County IGCC Project EIS presents information describing environmental and other resources that might potentially be affected by the proposed action or analyzed alternatives; it serves as a baseline from which the proposed project’s impacts are evaluated. This chapter describes the existing or baseline conditions of resources relative to the three major components of the proposed project: (1) the power plant, which is the component of the project that would be supported by the proposed action (funding and loan guarantee), and several offsite connected actions, including (2) the lignite surface mine, and (3) various linear facilities (pipelines and electric power lines). Environmental characteristics of the affected sites and rights-of-way, as well as their immediate surroundings, are described to levels of detail commensurate with importance of the issues or potential impacts. In most sections baseline conditions are described in detail. However, in some other sections, given the nature of some aspects of this project and the limited potential to impact some environmental resources, relatively brief information is provided to describe the existing environmental characteristics or baseline conditions. The information and data provided in this chapter were gathered during field surveys as well as drawn from literature reports, maps, databases, and other publicly available sources. Sources include specific, project- related environmental documents and permit applications that have previously been filed. The information is pre- sented in the following sections, which describe the physical, biological, environmental, socioeconomic, cultural, and aesthetic and other features and conditions of the project areas and their surroundings: • 3.2—Regional Setting and General Area • 3.11—Wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-19-172, Small Community Air Service Development
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2019 SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT Process for Awarding Grants Could Be Improved GAO-19-172 March 2019 SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT Process for Awarding Grants Could Be Improved Highlights of GAO-19-172, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Since fiscal year 2002, DOT has Some aspects of the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) process for awarded 401 SCASDP grants totaling evaluating fiscal year 2014–2016 grant applications for the Small Community Air approximately $188 million to improve Service Development Program (SCASDP) were inconsistent with its published air service to small airports. GAO was grant notices, which communicate the process for potential applicants, and with asked to review DOT’s award process its internal evaluation plan, which is used by reviewers to rate applications. In and the effectiveness of recent grants. addition, DOT followed or partially followed recommended practices for awarding This report, among other things, (1) discretionary grants. examines the extent to which DOT’s • Grant notice and evaluation plan: DOT’s process for evaluating process for awarding fiscal year 2014– application eligibility and merit differed from the process described in its 2016 grants (the most recent award cycles when GAO began its review) grant notices. For example, DOT’s notice stated that it would use the was consistent with its grant notices criteria that airports have either insufficient air service or unreasonably and recommended practices for high airfares to determine whether an application is eligible for a grant, awarding discretionary grants, and (2) but in practice, DOT used these criteria to evaluate an application’s examines the extent to which fiscal merit.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Safety Report Safety Runway
    FAA Runway Safety Report Safety Runway FAA Runway Safety Report September 2007 September 2007 September Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 www.faa.gov OK-07-377 Message from the Administrator The primary mission of the Federal Aviation Administration is safety. It’s our bottom line. With the aviation community, we have developed the safest mode of transportation in the history of the world, and we are now enjoying the safest period in aviation history. Yet, we can never rest on our laurels because safety is the result of constant vigilance and a sharp focus on our bottom line. Managing the safety risks in the National Airspace System requires a systematic approach that integrates safety into daily operations in control towers, airports and aircraft. Using this approach, we have reduced runway incursions to historically low rates over the past few years, primarily by increasing awareness and training and deploying new technologies that provide critical information directly to flight crews and air traffic controllers. Other new initiatives and technologies, as outlined in the 2007 Runway Safety Report, will provide a means to an even safer tomorrow. With our partners, FAA will continue working to eliminate the threat of runway incursions, focusing our resources and energies where we have the best chance of achieving success. To the many dedicated professionals in the FAA and the aviation community who have worked so tirelessly to address this safety challenge, I want to extend our deepest gratitude and appreciation for the outstanding work you have done to address this ever-changing and ever-present safety threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Is for General Information Purposes Only
    SEC-AAAE SEC-AAAE Journal Mar. - Apr. 2019 BOARD of DIRECTORS Watching Charlotte Grow CLT Airport Breaks All- Time Flight Record in Dr. Toney Coleman AAE Airport analysts say offering more nonstop, long- 2018 - Now 7th Busiest Immediate Past President haul destinations will help Charlotte’s airport grow. Airport In The World Fayetteville, NC The international destinations that Charlotte Charlotte Stories The Charlotte Douglas Michael Reisman, AAE passengers want to fly to, but currently require a layover, include the Vancouver and Ontario areas of International Airport has now President ended their busiest year in Asheville, NC Canada, Cagle said. history. Last year, CLT saw a total of 46.4 million passengers Patrick Wilson, AAE Other top destinations are in the United States, walk ... President-Elect including Albuquerque, N.M., Honolulu and Orange Knoxville, TN County, Calif., he said. Mihai Smighelschi, AAE Asheville Regional Secretary/Treasurer Roughly 12 million Atlanta passengers, or about 12 Airport: New TSA Knoxville, TN percent, were traveling to and from international Precheck line now open destinations in 2017. In Charlotte, roughly 3.3 million Asheville Citizen-Times BOARD MEMEBERS passengers, or about 7 percent were traveling The airport said the AT LARGE Transportation Security internationally. Administration's expedited Jason Terreri, AAE screening program will have a Sanford, FL Last summer, American Airlines announced plans to dedicated security line for add a nonstop to Munich in March. At the time, the preapproved travelers ... Scott Van Moppes, AAE Charlotte Chamber said that more than 200 German Myrtle Beach, SC companies in the city employ about 17,000 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Safety Report
    FAA Runway Safety Report Safety Runway FAA Runway Safety Report June 2008 June 2008 June Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 OK-08-3966 www.faa.gov Message from the Administrator A successful flight — whether trans-oceanic in a commercial airliner or a short trip in a private airplane — begins and ends with safe ground operations. While within the purview and oversight of the Federal Aviation Administration, runway safety is at the same time the ongoing responsibility of pilots, air traffic controllers, and airport ground vehicle operators. Through training and education, heightened awareness, enhanced airport signage and markings, and dedicated technology, FAA is providing each of these constituencies with the tools required to significantly improve runway safety. The ultimate goal is to reduce the severity, number, and rate of runway incursions; this report details a number of accomplishments and encouraging trends toward that end. A glance at the Executive Summary provides an overview of runway incursion data as well as numerous initiatives either completed, underway or about to begin. Serious runway incursions, which involve a significant reduction in adequate separation between two aircraft and where the risk of a collision is considerable, are trending favorably. In fiscal year 2007, these types of incur- sions were down 23 percent from the previous year and at their lowest total during the past four years. Since 2001, serious runway incursions are down 55 percent. In August 2007, we met with more than 40 aviation leaders from airlines, airports, air traffic controller and pilot unions, and aerospace manufacturers under a “Call to Action” for Runway Safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Download .PDF
    Southeast Chapter—AAAE July—August 2012 Mailed August 1, 2012 SEC JOURNAL Dead Link? Google the Headline. INSIDE THIS ISSUE: FBI Places Liens Against Suspended Foothills Regional Airport ... Cox Announces Retirement 1 LoanSafe Source: Sharon McBrayer The News Herald, Morganton, N.C. (MCT) -- MORGANTON, Asheville May Lose Control 2 N.C.The federal government has a lien against the now suspended ... Simmons Tells Tales 3 See all stories on this topic » JetBlue’s Interest In Naples 5 Southwest Slated for Branson 7 Mobile Prepares for Airbus 8 Lafayette Regional Airport receiving money for improvements KATC Lafayette News TSA Uniforms Made in Mexico? 9 NEW ORLEANS (AP) - Lafayette Regional Airport is getting a $1.1 million grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation. See all stories on this topic » Your Dulles Airport Hits 500M Passenger Milestone SEC-AAAE Patch.com The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and Dulles International Airport threw a Board of surprise party for the passengers waiting to board United Airlines flight ... Directors See all stories on this topic » Mike Landguth, AAE Immediate Past President Raleigh-Durham, NC Picking a fight with Washington's airports authority Washington Post Chris Browne, C.M. Virginia Gov. McDonnell's firing of board member ups the ante. President See all stories on this topic » Washington, DC Mike Clow, AAE President-Elect Council confirms new Shreveport airport director Morgantown, WV Shreveport Times The Shreveport City Council followed the recommendation of the Shreveport Airport Au- Jeff Gray, AAE thority and unanimously confirmed Bryant Francis as airport director during today's regular Secretary-Treasurer meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Airports a Vision of 2040 and 2070
    The Future of Airports A Vision of 2040 and 2070 Topic No. 3: Smart Airports at the Era of Information Technologies White Paper ENAC Alumni – Airport Think Tank Version 2 of April 2020 The Future of Airports: A Vision of 2040 and 2070 Disclaimer The materials of The Future of Airports are being provided to the general public for information purposes only. The information shared in these materials is not all-encompassing or comprehensive and does not in any way intend to create or implicitly affect any elements of a contractual relationship. Under no circumstances ENAC Alumni, the research team, the panel members, and any participating organizations are responsible for any loss or damage caused by the usage of these contents. ENAC Alumni does not endorse products, providers or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer’s names appear herein solely for illustration purposes. ‘Participating organization’ designates an organization that has brought inputs to the roundtables and discussions that have been held as part of this research initiative. Their participation is not an endorsement or validation of any finding or statement of The Future of Airports. ENAC Alumni 7 Avenue Edouard Belin | CS 54005 | 31400 Toulouse Cedex 4 | France https://www.alumni.enac.fr/en/ | [email protected] | +33 (0)5 62 17 43 38 2 Topic No. 3: Smart Airports at the Era of Information Technologies Research Team • Gaël Le Bris, C.M., P.E., Principal Investigator | Senior Aviation Planner, WSP, Raleigh, NC, USA • Loup-Giang Nguyen, Data Analyst | Aviation Planner, WSP, Raleigh, NC, USA • Beathia Tagoe, Assistant Data Analyst | Aviation Planner, WSP, Raleigh, NC, USA Panel Members • Eduardo H.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Annual Runway Safety Report 2010
    Air Traffic Organization Annual Runway Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Safety Report 2010 Washington, DC 20591 Message from the Administrator Dear Colleague: When serious runway incursions drop by 50 percent over the previous year, you know you’re doing something right. The good news here is every corner of the aviation community is sharing the success. From the airlines to the business aviation community to the pilots, controllers, surface vehicle operators and the GA enthusiasts who just fly for pleasure, everyone has taken a step up. The numbers alone tell the story. With almost 53 million operations in FY 2009, we had 12 serious runway incursions, down from 25 the previous year; two serious incursions involved commercial aircraft. Those are encouraging numbers. When we issued a Call to Action for runway safety almost two years ago, we as a community recognized the need to do a better job of keeping things safe on the airport surface. Even though the number of mistakes is infinitesimally small, given the number of successful operations per day, we nevertheless need to take every opportunity to continue to enhance surface safety. As you’ll clearly see in the runway safety report, that’s what is happening. The emergence of a “just culture” between regulator and regulated has played a huge part. Because we have so few data points, we need for the people in the system to be able to say, “Here’s a problem” without fear of penalty. As a result, we’re learning about the soft spots, the places, and procedures that need to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue and Operational Impacts of Depeaking Flights at Hub Airports
    REVENUE AND OPERATIONAL IMPACTS OF DEPEAKING FLIGHTS AT HUB AIRPORTS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Donald Samuel Katz In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December, 2012 REVENUE AND OPERATIONAL IMPACTS OF DEPEAKING FLIGHTS AT HUB AIRPORTS Approved by: Dr. Laurie A. Garrow, Advisor Dr. Jorge A. Laval School of Civil and Environmental School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael O. Rodgers Dr. Jeffrey P. Newman School of Civil and Environmental School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Matthew J. Higgins Date Approved: November 6, 2012 Ernest Scheller Jr. School of Business Georgia Institute of Technology ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to show my gratitude to the professors at Georgia Tech who have helped me along the way in preparing my thesis work. My advisor Dr. Laurie Garrow has helped steer me in the right direction as I progressed through my project, aiding in getting me feedback from inside and outside the department, and scoping my project based on my interest. I would also like to thank Dr. Jorge Laval, Dr. Michael Rodgers, Dr. Jeffrey Newman, and Dr. Matthew Higgins for serving on my committee and providing helpful feedback to help make this project stronger. I am grateful to my Airport Cooperative Research Program Graduate Award panel members who graciously gave their time to review my work and meet to discuss my progress. Dr. Irina Ioachim, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 28 – Marketing Guidebook for Small Airports
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 28 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Marketing Guidebook for Small Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2009 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Independent Consultant VICE CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel Minneapolis–St. Paul MEMBERS Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY MEMBERS Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg James Crites Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Richard de Neufville Norfolk, VA Massachusetts Institute of Technology William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Kevin C. Dolliole David S. Ekern, Commissioner, Virginia DOT, Richmond Unison Consulting John K. Duval Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Beverly Municipal Airport Virginia, Charlottesville Kitty Freidheim Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Freidheim Consulting Edward A.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Flight and Registered Traveler Hearing
    S. HRG. 109–461 THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION’S AVIATION PASSENGER PRESCREENING PROGRAMS: SECURE FLIGHT AND REGISTERED TRAVELER HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 9, 2006 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 27–562 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:24 Jul 11, 2006 Jkt 027562 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\27562.TXT JACKF PsN: JACKF SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Co-Chairman CONRAD BURNS, Montana JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia TRENT LOTT, Mississippi JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine BARBARA BOXER, California GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada MARIA CANTWELL, Washington GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska JIM DEMINT, South Carolina MARK PRYOR, Arkansas DAVID VITTER, Louisiana LISA J. SUTHERLAND, Republican Staff Director CHRISTINE DRAGER KURTH, Republican Deputy Staff Director KENNETH R. NAHIGIAN, Republican Chief Counsel MARGARET L. CUMMISKY, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel SAMUEL E. WHITEHORN, Democratic Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel LILA HARPER HELMS, Democratic Policy Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:24 Jul 11, 2006 Jkt 027562 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\27562.TXT JACKF PsN: JACKF C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on February 9, 2006 ........................................................................
    [Show full text]