DOCSLIB.ORG

2–9–00 Vol. 65 No. 27 Wednesday Feb. 9, 2000 Pages 6305–6522

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2–9–00 Vol. 65 No. 27 Wednesday Feb. 9, 2000 Pages 6305–6522 2±9±00 Wednesday Vol. 65 No. 27 Feb. 9, 2000 Pages 6305±6522 VerDate 27-JAN-2000 19:21 Feb 08, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\09FEWS.LOC pfrm11 PsN: 09FEWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2000 The FEDERAL REGISTER is published daily, Monday through SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, PUBLIC Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Subscriptions: Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. General online information 202±512±1530; 1±888±293±6498 Single copies/back copies: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 512±1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 523±5243 Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 523±5243 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing. For a list of documents currently on file for public inspection, see http://www.nara.gov/ fedreg. The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration authenticates the Federal Register as the official serial publication established under the Federal Register Act. Under 44 U.S.C. 1507, the contents of the Federal Register shall be judicially noticed. The Federal Register is published in paper and on 24x microfiche. It is also available online at no charge as one of the databases on GPO Access, a service of the U.S. Government Printing Office. The online edition of the Federal Register is issued under the authority of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register as the official legal equivalent of the paper and microfiche editions (44 U.S.C. 4101 and 1 CFR 5.10). It is updated by 6 a.m. each day the Federal Register is published and it includes both text and graphics from Volume 59, Number 1 (January 2, 1994) forward. GPO Access users can choose to retrieve online Federal Register documents as TEXT (ASCII text, graphics omitted), PDF (Adobe Portable Document Format, including full text and all graphics), or SUMMARY (abbreviated text) files. Users should carefully check retrieved material to ensure that documents were properly downloaded. On the World Wide Web, connect to the Federal Register at http:/ /www.access.gpo.gov/nara. Those without World Wide Web access can also connect with a local WAIS client, by Telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, or by dialing (202) 512-1661 with a computer and modem. When using Telnet or modem, type swais, then log in as guest with no password. For more information about GPO Access, contact the GPO Access User Support Team by E-mail at [email protected]; by fax at (202) 512±1262; or call (202) 512±1530 or 1±888±293±6498 (toll free) between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern time, Monday±Friday, except Federal holidays. The annual subscription price for the Federal Register paper edition is $555, or $607 for a combined Federal Register, Federal Register Index and List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA) subscription; the microfiche edition of the Federal Register including the Federal Register Index and LSA is $220. Six month subscriptions are available for one-half the annual rate. The charge for individual copies in paper form is $8.00 for each issue, or $8.00 for each group of pages as actually bound; or $1.50 for each issue in microfiche form. All prices include regular domestic postage and handling. International customers please add 25% for foreign handling. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or charge to your GPO Deposit Account, VISA, MasterCard or Discover. Mail to: New Orders, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250±7954. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal Register. How To Cite This Publication: Use the volume number and the page number. Example: 65 FR 12345. VerDate 27-JAN-2000 19:21 Feb 08, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\09FEWS.LOC pfrm11 PsN: 09FEWS 2 III Contents Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 27 Wednesday, February 9, 2000 Agricultural Marketing Service NOTICES RULES Agency information collection activities: Nectarines and peaches grown inÐ Submission for OMB review; comment request, 6355± California, 6305±6308 6356 Spearmint oil produced in Far West, 6308±6312 PROPOSED RULES Commodity Futures Trading Commission Raisins produced from grapes grown inÐ NOTICES California, 6341±6344 Contract market proposals: NOTICES Chicago Mercantile ExchangeÐ Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Five year and ten year agency notes, 6361 Federal-State Marketing Improvement Program; correction, 6353 Consumer Product Safety Commission NOTICES Agriculture Department Agency information collection activities: See Agricultural Marketing Service Proposed collection; comment request, 6361±6362 See Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Meetings; Sunshine Act, 6362 See Forest Service See Natural Resources Conservation Service Drug Enforcement Administration NOTICES Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service B.I. Chemicals, Inc., 6395 RULES Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., 6395 Animal welfare: Mallinckrodt, Inc., 6396 Field study; definition, 6312±6314 Economic Analysis Bureau Census Bureau NOTICES NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 6357±6358 Proposed collection; comment request, 6356±6357 Education Department Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NOTICES NOTICES Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Meetings: Jacob K. Javits gifted and talented students education National Vaccine Advisory Committee, 6374 program, 6520±6521 State educational agencies; submission of expenditure and Children and Families Administration revenue data, etc., 6362±6363 NOTICES Energy Department Agency information collection activities: See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Proposed collection; comment request, 6374±6376 See Hearings and Appeals Office, Energy Department Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 6376 NOTICES Electricity export and import authorizations, permits, etc.: Coast Guard Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc., 6363±6364 RULES Meetings: Drawbridge operations: Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Massachusetts, 6325±6327 Board, 6364±6365 Vessel inspection; frequency, 6494±6510 PROPOSED RULES Environmental Protection Agency Merchant marine officers and seamen: RULES Manning requirementsÐ Air quality implementation plans; approval and Federal pilotage for foreign-trade vessels in Maryland, promulgation; various States: 6350±6351 Iowa; plan identification; effective date note; CFR NOTICES correction, 6327 Agency information collection activities: NOTICES Proposed collection; comment request, 6437±6438 Pesticide registration, cancellation, etc.: Burkholderia cepacia strain Ral-3, 6369±6370 Commerce Department Pesticides; experimental use permits, etc.: See Census Bureau Monsanto Co., 6370±6371 See Economic Analysis Bureau Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.: See Export Administration Bureau Chesapeake Bay Program; participating organizationsÐ See International Trade Administration Qualifications and preliminary proposals for See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration communications, outreach, and education, 6371 VerDate 27-JAN-2000 19:36 Feb 08, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\09FECN.LOC pfrm10 PsN: 09FECN IV Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2000 / Contents Executive Office of the President Comprehensive conservation plans; availability, etc.: See Presidential documents Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, WA, 6390±6391 Endangered and threatened species permit applications, Export Administration Bureau 6391±6392 NOTICES Meetings: Food and Drug Administration President's Export Council, 6358 NOTICES Meetings: Federal Aviation Administration Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, 6377 RULES Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.: Airworthiness directives: Special Protocol Assessment; industry guidance, 6377± Boeing; correction, 6444 6380 Class D and Class E airspace, 6320±6321 Standard instrument approach procedures, 6321±6325 NOTICES Forest Service International slots for winter 2000/2001 scheduling season; NOTICES submission deadline, 6438 Environmental statements; notice of intent: Fernow Experimental Forest, WV, 6353±6354 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Meetings: NOTICES Resource Advisory CouncilsÐ Agency information collection activities: John Day Snake, 6354±6355 Proposed collection; comment request, 6371±6372 General Services Administration Federal Election Commission NOTICES NOTICES Inquiry as to availability; form cancellation, 6373
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AAPTP Project 05-02: Fuel Resistant Sealers and Binders for HMA Airfield Pavements
    AAPTP Project 05-02: Fuel Resistant Sealers and Binders for HMA Airfield Pavements Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program (AAPTP) FINAL REPORT Submitted by: Douglas I. Hanson AMEC Earth and Environmental Dr. Robert E. Boyer Airport Pavement Consultant Dr. Gayle King GHK, Inc Atish Nadkarni AMEC Earth and Environmental April 30, 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This report has been prepared under the Airport Asphalt Pavement Technology Program (AAPTP). Funding is provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Cooperative Agreement Number 04-G-038. Dr. David Brill is the Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative and a Program Manager in FAA Technology R & D Branch at the William J. Hughes Technical Center. Mr. Monte Symons served as the Project Director for this project. The AAPTP and the FAA thank the Project Technical Panel that willingly gave of their expertise and time for the development of this report. They were responsible for the oversight and the technical direction. The names of the individuals on the Technical Panel are as follows: 1. David Brill 2. David Hein 3. Jack Youcheff 4. Michael Moore DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented within. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views and policies of the Federal Aviation Administration. The report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. Neither the authors not the United States Government endorse products or manufacturers. Company or equipment manufacturer’s names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the purpose of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Regional
    3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter of the Kemper County IGCC Project EIS presents information describing environmental and other resources that might potentially be affected by the proposed action or analyzed alternatives; it serves as a baseline from which the proposed project’s impacts are evaluated. This chapter describes the existing or baseline conditions of resources relative to the three major components of the proposed project: (1) the power plant, which is the component of the project that would be supported by the proposed action (funding and loan guarantee), and several offsite connected actions, including (2) the lignite surface mine, and (3) various linear facilities (pipelines and electric power lines). Environmental characteristics of the affected sites and rights-of-way, as well as their immediate surroundings, are described to levels of detail commensurate with importance of the issues or potential impacts. In most sections baseline conditions are described in detail. However, in some other sections, given the nature of some aspects of this project and the limited potential to impact some environmental resources, relatively brief information is provided to describe the existing environmental characteristics or baseline conditions. The information and data provided in this chapter were gathered during field surveys as well as drawn from literature reports, maps, databases, and other publicly available sources. Sources include specific, project- related environmental documents and permit applications that have previously been filed. The information is pre- sented in the following sections, which describe the physical, biological, environmental, socioeconomic, cultural, and aesthetic and other features and conditions of the project areas and their surroundings: • 3.2—Regional Setting and General Area • 3.11—Wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-19-172, Small Community Air Service Development
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2019 SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT Process for Awarding Grants Could Be Improved GAO-19-172 March 2019 SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT Process for Awarding Grants Could Be Improved Highlights of GAO-19-172, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Since fiscal year 2002, DOT has Some aspects of the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) process for awarded 401 SCASDP grants totaling evaluating fiscal year 2014–2016 grant applications for the Small Community Air approximately $188 million to improve Service Development Program (SCASDP) were inconsistent with its published air service to small airports. GAO was grant notices, which communicate the process for potential applicants, and with asked to review DOT’s award process its internal evaluation plan, which is used by reviewers to rate applications. In and the effectiveness of recent grants. addition, DOT followed or partially followed recommended practices for awarding This report, among other things, (1) discretionary grants. examines the extent to which DOT’s • Grant notice and evaluation plan: DOT’s process for evaluating process for awarding fiscal year 2014– application eligibility and merit differed from the process described in its 2016 grants (the most recent award cycles when GAO began its review) grant notices. For example, DOT’s notice stated that it would use the was consistent with its grant notices criteria that airports have either insufficient air service or unreasonably and recommended practices for high airfares to determine whether an application is eligible for a grant, awarding discretionary grants, and (2) but in practice, DOT used these criteria to evaluate an application’s examines the extent to which fiscal merit.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Safety Report Safety Runway
    FAA Runway Safety Report Safety Runway FAA Runway Safety Report September 2007 September 2007 September Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 www.faa.gov OK-07-377 Message from the Administrator The primary mission of the Federal Aviation Administration is safety. It’s our bottom line. With the aviation community, we have developed the safest mode of transportation in the history of the world, and we are now enjoying the safest period in aviation history. Yet, we can never rest on our laurels because safety is the result of constant vigilance and a sharp focus on our bottom line. Managing the safety risks in the National Airspace System requires a systematic approach that integrates safety into daily operations in control towers, airports and aircraft. Using this approach, we have reduced runway incursions to historically low rates over the past few years, primarily by increasing awareness and training and deploying new technologies that provide critical information directly to flight crews and air traffic controllers. Other new initiatives and technologies, as outlined in the 2007 Runway Safety Report, will provide a means to an even safer tomorrow. With our partners, FAA will continue working to eliminate the threat of runway incursions, focusing our resources and energies where we have the best chance of achieving success. To the many dedicated professionals in the FAA and the aviation community who have worked so tirelessly to address this safety challenge, I want to extend our deepest gratitude and appreciation for the outstanding work you have done to address this ever-changing and ever-present safety threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Is for General Information Purposes Only
    SEC-AAAE SEC-AAAE Journal Mar. - Apr. 2019 BOARD of DIRECTORS Watching Charlotte Grow CLT Airport Breaks All- Time Flight Record in Dr. Toney Coleman AAE Airport analysts say offering more nonstop, long- 2018 - Now 7th Busiest Immediate Past President haul destinations will help Charlotte’s airport grow. Airport In The World Fayetteville, NC The international destinations that Charlotte Charlotte Stories The Charlotte Douglas Michael Reisman, AAE passengers want to fly to, but currently require a layover, include the Vancouver and Ontario areas of International Airport has now President ended their busiest year in Asheville, NC Canada, Cagle said. history. Last year, CLT saw a total of 46.4 million passengers Patrick Wilson, AAE Other top destinations are in the United States, walk ... President-Elect including Albuquerque, N.M., Honolulu and Orange Knoxville, TN County, Calif., he said. Mihai Smighelschi, AAE Asheville Regional Secretary/Treasurer Roughly 12 million Atlanta passengers, or about 12 Airport: New TSA Knoxville, TN percent, were traveling to and from international Precheck line now open destinations in 2017. In Charlotte, roughly 3.3 million Asheville Citizen-Times BOARD MEMEBERS passengers, or about 7 percent were traveling The airport said the AT LARGE Transportation Security internationally. Administration's expedited Jason Terreri, AAE screening program will have a Sanford, FL Last summer, American Airlines announced plans to dedicated security line for add a nonstop to Munich in March. At the time, the preapproved travelers ... Scott Van Moppes, AAE Charlotte Chamber said that more than 200 German Myrtle Beach, SC companies in the city employ about 17,000 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Safety Report
    FAA Runway Safety Report Safety Runway FAA Runway Safety Report June 2008 June 2008 June Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 OK-08-3966 www.faa.gov Message from the Administrator A successful flight — whether trans-oceanic in a commercial airliner or a short trip in a private airplane — begins and ends with safe ground operations. While within the purview and oversight of the Federal Aviation Administration, runway safety is at the same time the ongoing responsibility of pilots, air traffic controllers, and airport ground vehicle operators. Through training and education, heightened awareness, enhanced airport signage and markings, and dedicated technology, FAA is providing each of these constituencies with the tools required to significantly improve runway safety. The ultimate goal is to reduce the severity, number, and rate of runway incursions; this report details a number of accomplishments and encouraging trends toward that end. A glance at the Executive Summary provides an overview of runway incursion data as well as numerous initiatives either completed, underway or about to begin. Serious runway incursions, which involve a significant reduction in adequate separation between two aircraft and where the risk of a collision is considerable, are trending favorably. In fiscal year 2007, these types of incur- sions were down 23 percent from the previous year and at their lowest total during the past four years. Since 2001, serious runway incursions are down 55 percent. In August 2007, we met with more than 40 aviation leaders from airlines, airports, air traffic controller and pilot unions, and aerospace manufacturers under a “Call to Action” for Runway Safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Download .PDF
    Southeast Chapter—AAAE July—August 2012 Mailed August 1, 2012 SEC JOURNAL Dead Link? Google the Headline. INSIDE THIS ISSUE: FBI Places Liens Against Suspended Foothills Regional Airport ... Cox Announces Retirement 1 LoanSafe Source: Sharon McBrayer The News Herald, Morganton, N.C. (MCT) -- MORGANTON, Asheville May Lose Control 2 N.C.The federal government has a lien against the now suspended ... Simmons Tells Tales 3 See all stories on this topic » JetBlue’s Interest In Naples 5 Southwest Slated for Branson 7 Mobile Prepares for Airbus 8 Lafayette Regional Airport receiving money for improvements KATC Lafayette News TSA Uniforms Made in Mexico? 9 NEW ORLEANS (AP) - Lafayette Regional Airport is getting a $1.1 million grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation. See all stories on this topic » Your Dulles Airport Hits 500M Passenger Milestone SEC-AAAE Patch.com The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and Dulles International Airport threw a Board of surprise party for the passengers waiting to board United Airlines flight ... Directors See all stories on this topic » Mike Landguth, AAE Immediate Past President Raleigh-Durham, NC Picking a fight with Washington's airports authority Washington Post Chris Browne, C.M. Virginia Gov. McDonnell's firing of board member ups the ante. President See all stories on this topic » Washington, DC Mike Clow, AAE President-Elect Council confirms new Shreveport airport director Morgantown, WV Shreveport Times The Shreveport City Council followed the recommendation of the Shreveport Airport Au- Jeff Gray, AAE thority and unanimously confirmed Bryant Francis as airport director during today's regular Secretary-Treasurer meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Fcin Ncn-Ünd Iwådn
    United States Bankruptcy Court for thet DISTRICT Ot HAWAII Ca$e number ¡,t*nown¡ ,! .., ,, Chapter 1 lJ Cneck ¡f this an amended filing Official Form 201 Woüu¡ntary Fetíttçn¡ fCIn Ncn-ünd iwådn¡ats FälËnq for ËSanlqnuptev 4t16 lf rn ore space is needed, attâch a separats sheet to this fotm._on the top of any a_dditional pages, wr¡te the debtor's For ¡nformation, narne and case number (if known). more a separate documont, lnstructions for Bankruptèy Èo,rnis for Non-tndìv"¡du'atsi, is åoãirunru. 1. Oebtor's name Hawaii lsland All otlrer names debtor used in the last I years lnclude any assumed DBA lsland Air names, trade names and doing lrusrhess Ðs names J Debtor'$ federal Ëmployer ldentification Number (ElN) 99-01 98708 4. nebtor's address Principal place of business llJlailing âddross, if d¡fferent from principal place of business 550 Paiea Street Suite ?36 l-lonol ul¡r, tJ f 968- q _1" Nunrber, Street, City, State & ZlÈ Òôde P.O llox, Nu¡nber, Street, Crty, Släie & llp Cooe Honolulu ' Locatôon of prlncipal assets, if rlifferent front pr¡ncipal County place of business Nrirltrei, Siieet, City, State A Z-iÞ Òoclu S. Debtor'swcbslte(L,RL) www.islarrdair.çç¡l.l (ì, Tyflo of ctebtor W Corporation (inclucling L¡mitecj Liâbility Conrpany (Lt-C)ancl Limited Liability Pa¡lnership (l-t-p)) [-] Partnership (excluding LLp) IJ Oth<:r. Specify: Iiiir;il,¡i l:or nr 20'ì Volurlir¿¡y frrrl.il.joir 1Ìrr r\ori,itrJiviijuals l.:iÌlirr¡:i foi l;S.arrlirrr¡ef:cy ûiì(Jc 1 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Airports a Vision of 2040 and 2070
    The Future of Airports A Vision of 2040 and 2070 Topic No. 3: Smart Airports at the Era of Information Technologies White Paper ENAC Alumni – Airport Think Tank Version 2 of April 2020 The Future of Airports: A Vision of 2040 and 2070 Disclaimer The materials of The Future of Airports are being provided to the general public for information purposes only. The information shared in these materials is not all-encompassing or comprehensive and does not in any way intend to create or implicitly affect any elements of a contractual relationship. Under no circumstances ENAC Alumni, the research team, the panel members, and any participating organizations are responsible for any loss or damage caused by the usage of these contents. ENAC Alumni does not endorse products, providers or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer’s names appear herein solely for illustration purposes. ‘Participating organization’ designates an organization that has brought inputs to the roundtables and discussions that have been held as part of this research initiative. Their participation is not an endorsement or validation of any finding or statement of The Future of Airports. ENAC Alumni 7 Avenue Edouard Belin | CS 54005 | 31400 Toulouse Cedex 4 | France https://www.alumni.enac.fr/en/ | [email protected] | +33 (0)5 62 17 43 38 2 Topic No. 3: Smart Airports at the Era of Information Technologies Research Team • Gaël Le Bris, C.M., P.E., Principal Investigator | Senior Aviation Planner, WSP, Raleigh, NC, USA • Loup-Giang Nguyen, Data Analyst | Aviation Planner, WSP, Raleigh, NC, USA • Beathia Tagoe, Assistant Data Analyst | Aviation Planner, WSP, Raleigh, NC, USA Panel Members • Eduardo H.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Annual Runway Safety Report 2010
    Air Traffic Organization Annual Runway Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Safety Report 2010 Washington, DC 20591 Message from the Administrator Dear Colleague: When serious runway incursions drop by 50 percent over the previous year, you know you’re doing something right. The good news here is every corner of the aviation community is sharing the success. From the airlines to the business aviation community to the pilots, controllers, surface vehicle operators and the GA enthusiasts who just fly for pleasure, everyone has taken a step up. The numbers alone tell the story. With almost 53 million operations in FY 2009, we had 12 serious runway incursions, down from 25 the previous year; two serious incursions involved commercial aircraft. Those are encouraging numbers. When we issued a Call to Action for runway safety almost two years ago, we as a community recognized the need to do a better job of keeping things safe on the airport surface. Even though the number of mistakes is infinitesimally small, given the number of successful operations per day, we nevertheless need to take every opportunity to continue to enhance surface safety. As you’ll clearly see in the runway safety report, that’s what is happening. The emergence of a “just culture” between regulator and regulated has played a huge part. Because we have so few data points, we need for the people in the system to be able to say, “Here’s a problem” without fear of penalty. As a result, we’re learning about the soft spots, the places, and procedures that need to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue and Operational Impacts of Depeaking Flights at Hub Airports
    REVENUE AND OPERATIONAL IMPACTS OF DEPEAKING FLIGHTS AT HUB AIRPORTS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Donald Samuel Katz In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December, 2012 REVENUE AND OPERATIONAL IMPACTS OF DEPEAKING FLIGHTS AT HUB AIRPORTS Approved by: Dr. Laurie A. Garrow, Advisor Dr. Jorge A. Laval School of Civil and Environmental School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael O. Rodgers Dr. Jeffrey P. Newman School of Civil and Environmental School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Matthew J. Higgins Date Approved: November 6, 2012 Ernest Scheller Jr. School of Business Georgia Institute of Technology ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to show my gratitude to the professors at Georgia Tech who have helped me along the way in preparing my thesis work. My advisor Dr. Laurie Garrow has helped steer me in the right direction as I progressed through my project, aiding in getting me feedback from inside and outside the department, and scoping my project based on my interest. I would also like to thank Dr. Jorge Laval, Dr. Michael Rodgers, Dr. Jeffrey Newman, and Dr. Matthew Higgins for serving on my committee and providing helpful feedback to help make this project stronger. I am grateful to my Airport Cooperative Research Program Graduate Award panel members who graciously gave their time to review my work and meet to discuss my progress. Dr. Irina Ioachim, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 28 – Marketing Guidebook for Small Airports
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 28 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Marketing Guidebook for Small Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2009 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Independent Consultant VICE CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel Minneapolis–St. Paul MEMBERS Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY MEMBERS Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg James Crites Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Richard de Neufville Norfolk, VA Massachusetts Institute of Technology William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Kevin C. Dolliole David S. Ekern, Commissioner, Virginia DOT, Richmond Unison Consulting John K. Duval Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Beverly Municipal Airport Virginia, Charlottesville Kitty Freidheim Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Freidheim Consulting Edward A.
    [Show full text]