Linguistic Nature of Prenasalization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 1977 Linguistic Nature of Prenasalization Mark H. Feinstein The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2207 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated w ith a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part o f the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections w ith a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St. John's Road, Tyler's Green High Wycombe, Bucks, England HP10 8HR 77-19,547 FEINSTEIN, Mark H., 1948- THE LINGUISTIC NATURE OF PRENASALIZATION. The City University of New York, Ph.D., 1977 Language, linguistics Xerox University Microfilms,Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 THE LINGUISTIC NATURE OF PRENASALIZATION by Mark H. Feinstein A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York. 1977 This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Linguistics in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. [signature] Date Chairman of Examining Comir [signature] Date Executive Officer Mark Liberman Alan Stevens Robert Vago Supervisory Committee The City University of New York ABSTRACT The linguistic nature of the class of sounds which are traditionally called "prenasalized consonants" (PNCs) has never been adequately explored. The purpose of this work is to provide a descriptively adequate framework in which to characterize PNCs, and to express their behavior most generally. This is done within the theory of generative phonology (essentially the Standard Theory of Chomsky and Halle 1968), incorporating a theory of markedness and syl labification. It is argued that PNCs cannot be described adequately as monosegmental entities in linguistic theory. Rather, PNCs in all languages are claimed to be sequences of homorganic nasal and oral consonant in underlying phon ological representations, which surface in systematic phonetic representation as (tautosyllabic) syllable onsets. For a language to exhibit such onsets, it must contain a costly (language-specific) syllabification rule which con verts the unmarked syllabified string XN$CY (whose syllab ification is given by universal convention) into the marked structure X$NCY, where $ represents the syllable boundary. There is no linguistic level, nor any stage in phonological derivations, where PNCs must be represented monosegmentally, nor at which the characteristically brief nasal onset period must be referred to as an internal com ponent of an oral consonant. Such properties as are nec essary to fully characterize PNCs as physical-phonetic events are assigned to systematic phonetic $NC sequences by mechanisms within a phonetic performance theory. One of the very few languages where PNCs appear to contrast directly with ordinary heterosyllabic clusters of homorganic nasal and oral consonants is Sinhalese, an Indoeuropean language of Sri Lanka (Ceylon). An analysis of this language, and a similar case in the West African language Fula, are presented, and strong evidence is pro vided for the adequacy of a sequential analysis of pre nasalization, in spite of the apparent contrast. The analysis of Sinhalese also reveals a rich interaction be tween the behavior of PNCs and the general syllable struc ture of the language. This relationship can be revealingly expressed only if the notion of the syllable is formally available in phonological theory. Adviser: Prof. Charles Cairns ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My interest in prenasalization has grown primarily out of a long-term interest in the phonological and mor phological complexities of Sinhalese. I owe this interest to Chuck Cairns, with whom I first worked on the language, and who has been a model of intellectual rigor. None of my work in Sinhalese could have been accomplished with out the tireless support of Wimal De Silva, a native of Sri Lanka, who worked for several years as my informant. Virtually all of the Sinhalese data here was elicited from Mr. De Silva, who speaks the dialect of Galle in southwest ern Sri Lanka. I am also indebted to Bob Vago and Alan Stevens of Queens College and the Graduate Faculty in- Linguistics at CUNY, whose contributions to the content and style of this dissertation were invaluable. Mark Liberman's critical examination of the thesis as an outside reader was also invaluable; his insightful remarks contributed greatly to the coherence of this work. I would also like to thank Steve Strauss, a colleague and fellow student whose interest and insight were especially stimulating; and also Bob Herbert, whose thinking about prenasalization has somewhat paralleled my own, and whose knowledge of African linguistics and work on Luganda prenasalization were particularly helpful. Finally I want to express my gratitude to Terry Langendoen, whose broad linguistic in terests have helped me keep my own concerns in perspective; iv. to Bob Fiengo, whose intellectual excitement is infectious; to R.M.R. Hall, who saw me through a stimulating undergrad uate education in linguistics; to Peter Salus, who started it all; and to my wife Carol, who kept me sane and happy during the long completion of this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS Dissertation Abstract..................................... ii Acknowledgments...........................................iii CHAPTER I: THE SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF PRENASALIZATION 1 1.0. General Introduction.................................. 1 1.1. A Statement of the Hypothesis............. 5 1.2. Syllabification....................................... 9 1.2.1. Justification for the Syllable ...............10 1.2.2. Approaches to Syllabification Mechanisms......... 13 1.2.2.1. The Syllable Markedness Approach................13 1.2.2.2. The Maximal Cluster Approach.................... 16 1.2.2.3- The Universal Syllabification Convention and other Matters............................... 19 1.2.2.4. Supporting Evidence..............................22 1.3- Summary.............................................. 24 1.4. General Outline of the Dissertation.................25 CHAPTER II: UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES OF PNCs.................. 26 2.1. The Physical Nature of Prenasalization..............26 2.1.1. Duration and Tautosyllabicity..................... 26 2.1.2. Homorganicity................................. .....28 2.1.3* Nasalization....................................... 29 2.2. Types of PNCs........................................ 31 2.2.1. Voiced Stop PNCs................................... 31 2.2.2. Voiceless Stop PNCs................................32 2.2.3* Voiced and Voiceless Stop PNCs in Phonological Alternations......................33 2.2.4. Fricative PNCs..................................... 34 2.2.5. Affricate PNCs..................................... 35 2.2.6. On "Sonorant PNCs"................................. 35 2.3* A Classification of Languages with PNCs............ 38 2.3*1* Type 1 ............................................. 39 2.3*2. Type II ............................................ 40 2.3*3* Type III........................................... 42 2.3*4. Type IV ............................................ 44 2.3*5* Further Remarks and Summary....................... 44 2.4. Universal Implicational Laws and Markedness of PNCs..............................................46 2.4.1. General