Seal Beach NWR Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seal Beach NWR Final U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for management deci- sions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and mainte- nance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan May 2012 Vision Statement Tidal channels meandering through a sea of cordgrass deliver moisture and nourishment to support a healthy marsh ecosystem. As the quiet calm of the morning is interrupted by the clacking of a light-footed clapper rail, school children and other visitors, standing on the elevated observation deck, point with excitement in the direction of the call hoping for a glimpse of the rare bird. Shorebirds dart from one foraging area to another feasting on what appears to be an endless supply of food hidden within the tidal flats. California least terns fly above the tidal channels searching for small fish to carry back to their nests on NASA Island. A diverse array of marine organisms, from tube worms and sea stars to rays and sharks, and even an occasional green sea turtle, thrive within the tidal channels and open water areas of the Refuge’s diverse marsh complex, while Nelson’s sparrows and other upland birds find food and shelter within the native upland vegetation that borders the marsh. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-1832 Sacramento, CA 95825-1846 May 2012 Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Comprehensive Conservation Plan ....................................... 1-1 1.3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Wildlife Refuge System ........................... 1-2 1.3.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ................................................................................... 1-2 1.3.2 National Wildlife Refuge System .............................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Legal and Policy Guidance .................................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.1 National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 ................................. 1-6 Compatibility Policy .............................................................................................. 1-6 Appropriate Use Policy ......................................................................................... 1-7 Biological Integrity, Diversity and Environmental Health Policy ................. 1-9 Wilderness Stewardship Policy ........................................................................... 1-9 1.4.2 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ........................................................... 1-10 1.5 Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................ 1-10 1.5.1 Location ....................................................................................................................... 1-10 1.5.2 Physical Setting .......................................................................................................... 1-11 1.5.3 Ecosystem Context .................................................................................................... 1-11 1.5.4 Refuge Purpose and Authority ................................................................................. 1-13 1.5.5 Refuge Vision and Goals ........................................................................................... 1-14 1.5.6 History of Refuge Establishment ............................................................................ 1-15 Chapter 2 – The Planning Process ................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Preparing a Comprehensive Conservation Plan ................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Preplanning ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Public Involvement in Planning ........................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Overview of Issues and Public Scoping Comments ........................................................... 2-3 2.5 Management Concerns/Opportunities ................................................................................ 2-4 2.6 Development of a Refuge Vision .......................................................................................... 2-7 2.7 Development of Refuge Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .............................................. 2-7 2.8 Alternatives Development Process ...................................................................................... 2-8 2.9 Selection of the Refuge Preferred Alternative .................................................................. 2-8 2.10 Plan Implementation ............................................................................................................. 2-9 Chapter 3 – Refuge Management ...................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Overview of Refuge Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ..................................................... 3-1 3.2 Refuge Goals ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Objectives and Strategies ...................................................................................................... 3-2 3.4 History of Past Refuge Management ................................................................................ 3-18 3.4.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 3-18 3.4.2 Prior Management Documents ................................................................................ 3-18 3.4.3 Management History ................................................................................................. 3-20 3.4.4 Prior Refuge Actions ................................................................................................. 3-20 ņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņ Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan i Table of Contents ņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņņ 3.5 On-going and Future Refuge Management Actions and Programs ....................... 3-22 3.5.1 Wildlife and Habitat Management ............................................................. 3-22 3.5.1.1 Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive Species Management.... ......... 3-22 3.5.1.2 Predator Management ................................................................................ 3-26 3.5.1.3 Other Wildlife and Habitat Management Activities ................................ 3-28 3.5.1.4 Habitat Restoration ...................................................................................... 3-32 3.5.1.5 Integrated Pest Management Plan ............................................................ 3-35 3.6 Public Use ...................................................................................................................... 3-37 3.6.1 Public Access ................................................................................................. 3-37 3.6.2 Wildife Observation and Interpretation .................................................... 3-37 3.6.3 Environmental Education .................................................................................. 3-38 3.6.4 Other Wildlife-Dependent Recreational Uses .......................................... 3-38 3.7 Refuge Operations ........................................................................................................ 3-38 3.7.1 General Operations ....................................................................................... 3-38 3.7.2 Voluneers and Partners ............................................................................... 3-39 3.7.3 Coordination with Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach .......................... 3-40 3.7.4 Mosquito Management ................................................................................ 3-41 3.8 Environmental Contaminants Coordination ............................................................ 3-46 3.9 Cultural Resource Management ................................................................................ 3-47 Chapter 4 –Refuge Resources ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Location and Property Description.............................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 Flyway Setting ...............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Title 9: Public Property, Public Works and Building Regulations
    TITLE 9: PUBLIC PROPERTY, PUBLIC WORKS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter Section Subject Page 9.05 Beaches and Piers 9.05.005 Definitions ................................................................ 01 9.05.010 Lifeguards ................................................................ 02 9.05.015 Beachcombing ......................................................... 02 9.05.020 Beach Closure ......................................................... 02 9.05.025 Encroachments ........................................................ 02 9.05.030 Public Clothing Changes .......................................... 02 9.05.035 Littering (Ord 1538 - 2005) ................................................ 03 9.05.040 Sand Removal ......................................................... 03 9.05.045 Aquatic Activities ...................................................... 03 9.05.050 Athletic Activities at Seal Way .................................. 03 9.05.055 Fires ......................................................................... 03 9.05.060 Smoking on Pier or Beach (Ord 1538 - 2005) ................... 04 9.05.065 Fishing ..................................................................... 04 9.05.070 Climbing, Diving and Jumping .................................. 04 9.05.075 Defacement of Pier .................................................. 04 9.05.080 Removal of Mussels ................................................. 04 9.05.085 Commercial Activities on Beach or Pier ................... 05 9.05.090 Vehicles and Animals ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Orange County Water District Sunset Gap Monitoring Wells BS13, BS24 and Bolsa Chica Channel Levee Repair Project Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact: Daniel Bott December 2017 Table of Contents Section Page SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................1 -1 1.1 Purpose of Environmental Review ................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements ............................................................1 -1 1.3 Technical Information and Studies ................................................................. 1-2 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...............................................................2 -1 2.1 Proposed Project............................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Background ....................................................................................................2 -1 2.3 Well Site Locations .........................................................................................2 -3 2.4 Monitoring Well Construction Activities ...........................................................2 -5 2.5 Monitoring Well Long Term Operation and Maintenance Activities ................. 2-9 2.6 Bolsa Chica Flood Control Levee Repairs .................................................... 2-10 2.7 Bolsa Chica Channel Levee Repair Construction Activities .......................... 2-12 2.8 Permits and Approvals
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS HON. JOSEPH R. Mccarthy HON
    1956 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - ·HOUSE 2965 A. J. Hardin Peterson, Cochrane B_uilding, A. Manly Sheppard, 1001 15th Street NW.. A. -P. K. · Ward; 219 Washington Hotel, Lakeland, Fla. Washington, D. C. Washington, D. C. B. Peoples Lobby, Inc., 1337 21st Street B. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission, 24 B. Joint Committee _ of · Consumers and NW., Washingtcm, D. C. Branford Place, Newark, N. J. Small· Producers of Natural Gas, room 219, Washington Hotel, Washington, D. C, A. Ada E. Pruitt, 5814 Nevada Avenue NW., A. Southwestern Peanut Shellers Associa­ tion, Box 48, Durant, Okla. A. Myron Weiner, 917 15th Street NW., Washington, D. C. Washington, ·D. C. B. The Far East Group, Inc., 917 15th A. Purc~ll , & -Nelson, 910 17th Street NW., A. Spencer, Moore & Whalen, 2000 Massa­ Street NW., Washingto_n, D. C. Washington, D. C. chusetts Avenue NW., Washington, D. C. B. Devalin Corp., 120 Wall New B. Edward Martin Hinsberger, 55 ·Wall A. Mrs. Anna Kelton Wiley, 2345 Ashmead S~reet; Street, New York, N. Y. York,N. Y. Place, Washington, D. C. B. The Women's City Club, 1733 I Street A. W1lliam T. Stephens, 700 Washington NW., Washington, D. C., et al. A. Purcell & Nelson, 910 17th Street NW., Building, Washington, D. C. Washington, D. C. B. American Utility Trailer Rental Asso­ A. A. E. Wilkinson, 417 Investment Build­ B. Little & Christman, 120 Wall Street, New ciation, 700 Washington Building, Washing­ ing, Washington, D. C. York, N. Y. ton, D. C. B. The Anaconda Co., 616 Hennessy Build­ ing, Butte, Mo~t. A. Frank L. Roberts, 740 lltl- Street NW., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Members of Congressional Auxiliary” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 34, folder “Directories - Former Members of Congressional Auxiliary” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Betty Ford donated to the United States of America her copyrights in all of her unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. ROSTER - FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AUXILIARY - SEPTEMBER, 1975 Mrs. E. Ross Adair (Marian) Mrs. A. David Baumhart (Lois) Mrs. Frederick Bradley (Marie) Apartment N1406 1120 East Erie Avenue 4121 Argyle Terrace, N.W. Three R ivers Lorain, Ohio 44052 Washington, D. C. 20011 Ft. Wayne, Indiana 46802 (216) 288-2100 (202) 829-0337 Mrs. Hugh 0. Alexander (Myrtle) Mrs. J. Glenn Beall, Sr. (Margaret) Mrs. Ernest K. Bramblett (Lois) 525 Monticello Boulevard 2401 Calvert St., N.W. 6519 Oakdale Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22305 Washington, D. C. 20008 Woodland Hills, California 91364 (703) 548-1187 Beall's Lane Mrs. William G. Bray (Esther) Mrs. John G. Alexander (Mabel) Frostburg, Maryland 21532 489 N. Jefferson St. 327 Burntside Drive Martinsville, Indiana 46151 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Report Card
    Beach2020-2021 Report Card 1 HEAL THE BAY // 2020–2021 Beach2020-2021 Report Card We would like to acknowledge that Heal the Bay is located on the traditional lands of the Tongva People and pay our respect to elders both past and present. Heal the Bay is an environmental non-profit dedicated to making the coastal waters and watersheds of Greater Los Angeles safe, healthy and clean. To fulfill our mission, we use science, education, community action and advocacy. The Beach Report Card program is funded by grants from: ©2021 Heal the Bay. All Rights Reserved. The fishbones logo is a trademark of Heal the Bay. The Beach Report Card is a service mark of Heal the Bay. We at Heal the Bay believe the public has the right to know the water quality at their beaches. We are proud to provide West Coast residents and visitors with this information in an easy-to-understand format. We hope beachgoers will use this information to make the decisions necessary to protect their health. HEAL THE BAY CONTENTS2020-2021 • SECTION I: WELCOME EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................7 • SECTION II: WEST COAST SUMMARY CALIFORNIA OVERVIEW ..................................................................10 HONOR ROLL ......................................................................................14 BEACH BUMMERS ..............................................................................16 IMPACT OF BEACH TYPE.................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space/Recreation/ Conservation Element
    City of Seal Beach Open Space/Recreation/ Conservation Element Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Element Contents Purpose/Background..................................................................................................................................................1 Statutory Requirements...............................................................................................................................................2 Related Plans and Programs.......................................................................................................................................3 Other General Plan Elements...........................................................................................................................3 Local Coastal Program.......................................................................................................................................3 County of Orange General Plan.......................................................................................................................3 Quimby Act .........................................................................................................................................................4 Seal Beach Park Dedication Ordinance...........................................................................................................4 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................................................5 Community
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Setting
    Physical Setting Dunne and Leopold (1978) define a watershed as an area of land that drains water, sediment, and dissolved materials to a common outlet at some point along a stream channel. The Santa Ana River (SAR) Watershed, depicted in Figure 3-1, drains a 2,650 square-mile area. The watershed is home to over 6 million people and includes the major population centers of parts of Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, as well as a sliver of Los Angeles County. The Santa Ana River flows over 100 miles and drains the largest coastal stream system in Southern California. It discharges into the Pacific Ocean at the City of Huntington Beach. The total length of the SAR and its major tributaries is about 700 miles. 1 | W a t e r s h e d S e t t i n g Figure 3-1 Santa Ana Integrated Regional Water Management Region The watershed boundaries nearly match the boundaries of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, an organization with whom the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) has worked closely with for many years. In addition, its boundaries match the Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) region and the recognized Santa Ana Funding Area, as defined by the Proposition 84 IRWM program. Although there are many sub-watershed planning efforts, One Water One Watershed 2.0 (OWOW) attempts to bring all these efforts, as well as all different jurisdictions in the watershed, into a single watershed-wide vision. Over the years, SAWPA has participated in the development of sub-regional IRWM plans, with the understanding that such plans would be complementary to OWOW.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES and THEIR PLACES of RESIDENCE
    all Editors, Columnists, Commen . / tators - for IMMEDIATE RE LEASE as feature a rticle, let t er-to - editor, or as background materia l for editorial writers. No. M-544 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE EIGHTY -EIGHTH CONGRESS JANUARY 9, 1963 Democrats m roman, Republicans in italic. Those marked * served in the Eighty,Seventh Congress. Those marked t served in a previous Congress. NAME AND DISTRICT HOME NAME AND DISTRICT R OME NAME AND DISTRICT ROME ALABAMA HAWAII MICHIGAN AT LARGE AT LAI.GE I. Lucien N. Nedzi• .......................... ·--·-·-·--·--.... DetrOit. George Grant• ----··--···--·---·-··-·-----··-Troy. Thomas P. Gill ---·.. -- ..- ..................... Honolulu. 2. George Meader• ............................................. _Ann Arbor. George W . Andrews• --··-··-Union Springs. Spark M. Matsunaga __.............. - ............ Honolulu. 3. August E. I ohansen• -·-----.......... Battle Creek. Kenneth A. Roberts• ----··-··-····-··--··-Anniston. 4. Edward Hutchinson _ ... _ ............................... Fennville. Albert Rains• ---·--·--··----Gadsden. IDAHO 5. Gerald R. Ford, Jr. • _ ........ _._.... _.. Grand Rapids. Armistead I. Selden, Jr. • ______ Greensboro. I. Compton I. White ------..·-·-- ........ Clark Fork. 6. Charles E. Chamberlain• ____ .. __ East Lansing. Carl Elliott• -·--··-··--·-------------Jasper. 2. Ralph R. Harding• ............ _____Blackfoot. 7. James G. O'Hara• ......-- ......·---·-·- ....... Utica. Robert E. Jones, Jr.• ________Scottsboro. 8. James Har11ey•
    [Show full text]
  • Eighty-Seventh Congress January 3, 1961, to January 3, 1963
    EIGHTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1961, TO JANUARY 3, 1963 FIRST SESSION-January 3, 1961, to September 27, 1961 SECOND SESSION-January 10, 1962,1 to October 13, 1962 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES-RICHARD M. NIXON,2 of California;LYNDON B. JOHNSON,2 of Texas PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE-CARL HAYDEN, of Arizona SECRETARY OF THE SENATE-FELTON MCLELLAN JOHNSTON, of Mississippi SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE-JOSEPH C. DUKE, of Arizona SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-SAM RAYBURN,4of Texas; JOHN W. MCCORMACK,5 of Massachusetts CLERK OF THE HOUSE-RALPH R. ROBERTS,6 of Indiana SERGEANT OF ARMS OF THE HOUSE-ZEAKE W. JOHNSON, JR.,6 ofTennessee DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE-WILLIAM M. MILLER,6 of Mississippi POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE-H. H. MORRIS,6 of Kentucky ALABAMA Barry M. Goldwater, Phoenix John E. Moss, Jr., Sacramento SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES William S. Mailliard, San Francisco Lister Hill, Montgomery John J. Rhodes, Mesa John F. Shelley, San Francisco John J. Sparkman, Huntsville Stewart L. Udall,' Tucson John F. Baldwin, Martinez Morris K. Udall,8 Tucson Jeffery Cohelan, Berkeley REPRESENTATIVES George P. Miller, Alameda Frank W. Boykin, Mobile ARKANSAS J. Arthur Younger, San Mateo George M. Grant, Troy Charles S. Gubser, Gilroy George W. Andrews, Union Springs SENATORS John J. McFall, Manteca Kenneth A. Roberts, Anniston John L. McClellan, Camden Bernice F. Sisk, Fresno Albert Rains, Gadeden J. William Fulbright, Fayetteville Charles M. Teague, Ojai Armistead I. Selden, Jr., Greensboro REPRESENTATIVES Harlan F. Hagen, Hanford Carl A. Elliott, Jasper Ezekiel C. Gathings, West Memphis Gordon L.
    [Show full text]
  • Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/ Environmental Assessment March 2011
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/ Environmental Assessment March 2011 Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/ Environmental Assessment March 2011 Vision Statement Tidal channels meandering through a sea of cordgrass deliver moisture and nourishment to support a healthy marsh ecosystem. As the quiet calm of the morning is interrupted by the clacking of a light-footed clapper rail, school children and other visitors, standing on the elevated observation deck, point with excitement in the direction of the call hoping for a glimpse of the rare bird. Shorebirds dart from one foraging area to another feasting on what appears to be an endless supply of food hidden within the tidal flats. California least terns fly above the tidal channels searching for small fish to carry back to their nests on NASA Island. A diverse array of marine organisms, from tube worms and sea stars to rays and sharks, and even an occasional green sea turtle, thrive within the tidal channels and open water areas of the Refuge’s diverse marsh complex, while Nelson’s sharp-tailed sparrows and other upland birds find food and shelter within the native upland vegetation that borders the marsh.
    [Show full text]
  • The-OC-Plan-2018.Pdf
    Admin Draft July 2017 THE OC PLAN Integrated Regional Water Management for the North and Central Orange County Watershed Management Areas March 2018 The OC Plan Contacts County of Orange Orange County Watersheds Orange County Department of Public Works 2301 N. Glassell Street Orange, California 92865 www.ocwatersheds.com Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, California 92708 (714) 378-8248 www.ocwd.com Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 (714) 962-2411 www.ocsd.com March 2018 The OC PLAN for IRWM in North and Central Orange County TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. TOC-1 LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... AC-1 1 REGIONAL PLANNING, OUTREACH, GOVERNANCE AND COORDINATION........................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 History of Integrated Regional Water Management Planning in the North and Central Orange County Watershed Management Areas ...................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 IRWM Plan Development and Governance .................................................................................. 1-7 1.3.1 IRWM Plan Development................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES - Under Clause 1 of Rule XXII, Private Judiciary
    436 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE January 19 PRIVATE BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS H. R . 1896. A bill for the relief of Lech Szczepan Korgol; to the Committee on the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private Judiciary. bills and resolutions were introduced and By Mr. MARTIN of Massachusetts: MONDAY, JANUARY 19, 1953 severally referred as follows: H. R. ~ 897 . A bill for the relief of Mrs. The House met at 12 o'clock noon. By Mr. ADDONIZIO: Betty E. Lamay; to the Committee on the H. R. 1872. A bill for the relief of Joseph Judiciary. The Chaplain, Rev. Bernard Braskamp, F. Lounsberry; to the Committee on the By Mr. REGAN: D. D., offered the following prayer: Judiciary. H . R. 1898. A bill for the relief of Sister May Jacinta, nee Elena Natalia Carvalho; Almighty God, we rejoice that Thy By Mr. ALLEN of California: thoughts toward us are always those of . H. R. 1873. A bill for the relief of Michel to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr. ROONEY: peace and good will, of love and mercy. Bandak; to the Committ ee on the Judiciary. We humbly confess that we are fre­ H . R. 1874. A bill for the relief of Cesar H. R . 1899. A bill for the relief of Herm­ Grana; to the Committee on the Judiciary. inegilda Sanz; to the Committee on the quently greatly troubled as we face prob­ H. R,. 1875. A bill for the relief of Mir Judiciary. lems for which our fallible and finite Kazem Kashani; to the Committee on the H.
    [Show full text]