Full Document / CONNT95002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Full Document / CONNT95002 COMM-T-95-002 C2 BIOLOGICAL STUDY NONINDIGENOVS AQUATIC SPECIES IN A UNITED STATES ESTUARY: A CASESTUDY OF THE BIOI OGICALINVASIONS OF THE SAN H4%NCISCO BAY AND DELTA Andrew N. Cohen Energyand ResourcesGroup University of California at Berkeley Berke!eyCaliforrua 94720 JamesT. Carlton Maritime Studies Program Williams College Mystic Seaport Mystic Connecticut06355 A Report for the UNITED STATESFISH AND WILDLIFESERVICE, WASHINGTON D. C. and THE NATIONAL SEA GRANT COLLEGEPROGRAM CONNECTICUT SEA GRANT U NOAA Grant MLunberNA36RG0467! December 1995 .'.' l997 NtLTIGHALSU GIANTOEPOSggf PEll USRARYBOIUNg um HARIVlalLNSGTtNY Cg+g IEL CN82 Executive Suxrurtary 1 THESAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA REGION IS A HIGHLYINVADED ZCOSYFIK4L TheSan Francisco Estuary can now be recognized asthe most invaded aquaticecosystem inNoxth America. Now recognized inthe Estuary are 212 introducedspecies: 69 percent of theseare invextebrates, 15percent are fish andother vertebrates, 12 percent are vascxxlar plants and 4 percentare protists. ~ In theperiod since 1850, the San Francisco Bay and Delta repon has been invadedby an average of one new species every $6 weeks. Since 1970, the ratehas been at least one aew species every 24 weeks: the first coBection recordsof over50 non-nativespecies ia the Estuarysince 1970 thus appear to reflecta significantnew pulse of invasions. ~ In additionto the212 recognised introductions, 123 species are coasidered ascryptogenic not clearly native or introdxxced!, andthe total number of cryptogenictaxa in theEstuary might weil be twice that. Thus simply reportingthe documented intxoductions andassuming that aH other species in a regionare na tix~s virtuallyall previous studies have done severely underestimatesthe impact of marineand aquatic invasions on a region's biota. Nonindigenousaquatic animals and plants have had a pi'ofoundimpact on theecology of thisxegion. No shallow water habitat aow remains uninvaded byexotic species and, in some regions, it is difficult to find any native species in abundance.In someregions of theBay, 100@ of the coinmonspecies are introduced,creating "introduced communities." In locations ranging from freshwatersites in the Delta,through Suisun and SanPablo Bays and the shallowerparts of the CentralBay to the SouthBay, intmduced species accountfor the majorityof thespecies diversity. 2. A VAST AMOUNT OF ENERGY NOW PASSESTHROUGH AND IS UlKEKD BY THE NONINDIGKhJOUS BIOTA OF THE ESTUARY. IN THE 1990S, INTRODUCED SPECIES DOMINATE ANY OF mEESTUARY'S FOOD WEBS. ~ The majorblooxn-creating, donunant phytoplankton species are cxyptogenic. Becauseofthe poor state of taxonomic and biogeographic know'ledge, it remainspossible that many of theEstuary's major primary producers that providethe phytoplankton-derived energyfor zooplankton andfilter feeders,are in fact introduced. ~ Introduced speciesare abundant ind doniinantthroughout the benthic and fouliagcouimunities of SanFrancisco Bay. Theseindude 10 speciesof introducedbivalves, most of whichare abxxndant to extremelyabundant, Intmducedfilter-feeding polychaete worms and crustaceans may occur by the thousandsper squaremeter. Oa subhttoralhard substxates, the Mediterraneanmussel Mytttlls gallopomsciNIis is abundant,while float fouliaycommunities suppoxt large populations ofintxoduced filter feeders, includingbryoxoaas, sponges and seasquirts. The holisticmle of the entire nonindigenousfilter-feeding guild iadudingdams, mussels, bryozeans, barnacles,seasquirts, spionid worms, serpulid worms, sponges, hydroids, andsea anemones in alteringand controlling the trophic dynamics of the Bay-Deltasystem remains unknown. The potenbal role of just one species, theAtlantic ribbed marsh mussel Arcuafstla dern issa, as a biogeochemical agentin theeconomy of Baysalt marshes isstriking. ~ Introducedclams are capable offiltering the entire volume otthe South Bay andthe northern estuarine regions Suisun Bay! once a day:indeed, it now appearsthat the primary inechanism controHing phytopiankton biomass duringsummer and fall in SouthSan Francisco Way is "grazing' filter feedingby the introduced Japanese clams Vetrerupis and hfrtscsdistN and the Atlanticclam Gejurna. This remarkable process has a significantimpact on thestanding phytoplankton stockin the South Bay, and since this plankton isnow utilized almost entirely by introduced filter feeders, passing the energythrough a non-native benthic fraction ofthe biota may have fundamentallyaltered the energy available for native biota ~ Droughtyear control ofJrhytopiankton byintroduced clams resultina in the failureof the summer diatom bloom to appear ln thenorthern reach of the Estuary is a remarkablephenonienon. the introducedAtlantic soft-shell clamsQLfya! alone were estiinated tobe capable attimes of filtering atl of the hytoplanktonfromthe water column onthe order ofonce pei day. hytoplanktonblooms occurred only during higher flow years, when the populationsofMya and other introduced benthic filter feeders retreated downstreamtosaltier parts of theEstuary. Phytopianktonpopulations inthe northern reaches ofthe Estuary maynow' becontinuously andpermanently controlled byintroduced clams.Arriving byballast w'ater and first collected i»the Estuary in1986, by 198S the Asian clamPotamocorbula reached and has since sustained average densities exceeding2,000/m2, Since the appearance ofPofamocorbda, thesummer diatombloom has disappeared, presumably because ofincreased filter feedingby this new invasion. The Poftun ocorbtda population inthe northern reachesofthe Estuary can Filter the entire water column over the channels morethan once per day and over the shallows almost 13times per day, a rate offiltration which exceeds thephytoplankton's specificgrowth rate and approachesorexceeds thebacterioplankton's specificgrowth rate. ~ Further,the Asian clam Pottrrtt ocorbda feeds atmultiple levels inthe food chain,consuining bacterioplankton, phytoplankton, andzooplankton copepods!,andsomay substantially reducecopepod populations bothby depletionofthe copepods' phytoplankton foodsource andby direct predation.Inturn, under such conditions, thecopepodwating native opossumshrimp Ncortrysis maysuf fer a near-completecollapsein the northernreacIL Itwas during onesuch pattern thatmysid-eating juvenile stripedbasssuffered theirlowest recorded abundance. Thisexample and thelinkages between introduced andnative species mayprovide a direct andremarkable example ofthe potential iinpact ofan introduced specieson the Estllalys foodwebs. ~ Aswith the guild offilter feeders, theoverall picture ofthe impact of introducedsurface-dwelling andshallow-burrowing inggrazers anand d eliosit 't f eedersinthe Estuary isincompletely known. The Atlantic mudsnail Executive Summary 17yanassaislikely playing a significant if notthe mast ixnportant role in alteringthe diversi', abundance, size distribution, and recruitment of xnany specieson the intertidalmudflats of SanFrancisco Say. ~ The arrivaland establishment in 1989-90of theAtlantic green crab CNrciens xnaenasin SanFrancisco Bay signab a newlevel of trophicchange and alteration.The pee» crabis a foodand habitat generalist, capable of eating an extraordinarilywide variety of anixnaisand plants, and capableof inhabitingmarshes, rocky substrates, and f ouhngcoxnmunities. European, SouthAfrican, and recent Californian studies indicate a broadand striking potentialfor this crab to signi6cantly alter the distribution, density, and abundanceof preyspecies, and thusto profoundlyalter community struchire in the Bay. ~ Nearly 30 speciesof introducedmarine, brackishand freshwaterfish are now ixnportantcarnivores throughout the Bayaxld Delta. Easternand centralAmerican fish carp,mosquito6sh, catfish, green sunfish, bluegilis, inlandsilverside, layemouth and smallmouth bass, and striped bass are amongthe xnost significant predators, competitors, and habitatdisturbexs thmughout the brackishand freshwater reachesof the Delta, with often concoxnitantimpacts on native fish communities.The intmduced cray6sh Procambarusand Facifastecxxsmay play an importantrole, w hendense, in regulatingtheir prey plant and animalpopulations. Nativewaterfowl in theEstuary consume some introduced aquatic plants suchas brassbuttons! and native shazebirds feed extensively on introduced benthic invertebrates. 3. INTRODUCED SPECIESMAY 8E CAUSING PROFOUND SHtUCTULQ, CHANGES TO SOME OF THE ESTUARY'S HA8rrATS. ~ The Atlanticsalt-xnarsh cordgrass Spartxna eltcnijlora, which has converted 100sof acresof mudflatsin WiliapaBay, Washington, into grassislands, has becamelocally abundant in SanFrancisco Bay, and is competingwith the nativecordgrass. Spartinn alteruijlota has bmad potential for ecosystem alteration.Its lazger and more ripd stexns, greater stem density, and higher rootdensities may decrease habitat for nativew etlandanimals and infauna. Densestands of S.altrmijfora may cause changes in sedimentdynamics, decreasesin benthic algal production became of lower light leveb below the cordgrasscanopy, and loss of shorebirdfeeding habitat thmugh colonization of xnudflats TheAustralian-New Zealand boring isopod S'phseronxN qaroylnem creates characteristic"Splxacroma topography" on many Bay shores, with many linear metersof fringingmud banks riddled with its haM~ntixneterdianieter holes. Thisisopod may axguably play a major,if not thechief, mle in erosionof intertidalsoft rock terraces along the shore of SanPablo Bay, due to their boringactivity that weakens the mck and facilitates its removal by wave action.Sphmxanl has been burrowing inta Bay shores
Recommended publications
  • 4.3 Water Resources 4.3 Water Resources
    4.3 WATER RESOURCES 4.3 WATER RESOURCES This section describes the existing hydrological setting for the County, including a discussion of water quality, based on published and unpublished reports and data compiled by regional agencies. Agencies contacted include the United States Geological Survey, the California Department of Water Resources, and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. This section also identifies impacts that may result from the project. SETTING CLIMATE The local climate is considered warm desert receiving approximately six to eight inches of rainfall per year (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1986). Rainfall occurs primarily in the winter months, with lesser amounts falling in late summer and fall. Kings County would also be considered a dry climate since evaporation greatly exceeds precipitation.1 A common characteristic of dry climates, other than relatively small amounts of precipitation, is that the amount of precipitation received each year is highly variable. Generally, the lower the mean annual rainfall, the greater the year-to-year variability (Lutgens and Tarbuck, 1979). SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY The County is part of a hydrologic system referred to as the Tulare Lake Basin (Figure 4.3- 1). The management of water resources within the Tulare Lake Basin is a complex activity and is critical to the region’s agricultural operations. The County can be divided into three main hydrologic subareas: the northern alluvial fan and basin area (in the vicinity of the Kings, Kaweah, and Tule rivers and their distributaries), the Tulare Lake Zone, and the southwestern uplands (including the areas west of the California Aqueduct and Highway 5) (Figure 4.3-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Wildlife Service Re-Thinks Protection for Buena Vista Lake Shrew
    u)pr hyhyyrivrvrpryhr vps4D92 ""&$ Fish and Wildlife Service re-thinks protection for Buena Vista Lake Shrew WASHINGTON, D.C. October 20, 2009 9:27am • Re-proposes 4,649 acres of critical habitat in Kern County • Would reverse earlier decision In another reversal of decisions made during the administration of former President George W. Bush, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is proposing new protections for the Buena Lake shrew, a tiny mammal that lives in a small area of Kern County in the Central Valley. The FWS says it wants 4,649 acres in Kern County declared as critical habitat for the endangered animal, exactly the same acreage that it had first proposed in 2004. The announcement opens a 60-day public comment period. Earlier this month the Fish and Wildlife Service reversed itself on the economic impact of protecting the California habitat of the red-legged frog. It now says it is less than had been calculated. The new report on the frog strips out what some saw as political bias in the earlier estimates prepared for the George W. Bush administration. The new shrew proposal conforms to terms of a legal settlement resolving a challenge to the FWS’s final action on the earlier proposal, when it designated only 84 acres as critical habitat. In its settlement with the Center for Biological Diversity, announced last July, the FWS agreed to re-propose the same areas it had proposed in 2004. In its 2005 final critical habitat rule the FWS excluded four areas it had initially proposed, determining at the time that commitments by landowners would provide significantly better protection for the shrew.
    [Show full text]
  • Rp. 149.000,- Rp
    Indovision Basic Packages SUPER GALAXY GALAXY VENUS MARS Rp. 249.000,- Rp. 179.000,- Rp. 149.000,- Rp. 149.000,- Animax Animax Animax Animax AXN AXN AXN AXN BeTV BeTV BeTV BeTV Channel 8i Channel 8i Channel 8i Channel 8i E! Entertainment E! Entertainment E! Entertainment E! Entertainment FOX FOX FOX FOX FOXCrime FOXCrime FOXCrime FOXCrime FX FX FX FX Kix Kix Kix Kix MNC Comedy MNC Comedy MNC Comedy MNC Comedy MNC Entertainment MNC Entertainment MNC Entertainment MNC Entertainment One Channel One Channel One Channel One Channel Sony Entertainment Television Sony Entertainment Television Sony Entertainment Television Sony Entertainment Television STAR World STAR World STAR World STAR World Syfy Universal Syfy Universal Syfy Universal Syfy Universal Thrill Thrill Thrill Thrill Universal Channel Universal Channel Universal Channel Universal Channel WarnerTV WarnerTV WarnerTV WarnerTV Al Jazeera English Al Jazeera English Al Jazeera English Al Jazeera English BBC World News BBC World News BBC World News BBC World News Bloomberg Bloomberg Bloomberg Bloomberg Channel NewsAsia Channel NewsAsia Channel NewsAsia Channel NewsAsia CNBC Asia CNBC Asia CNBC Asia CNBC Asia CNN International CNN International CNN International CNN International Euronews Euronews Euronews Euronews Fox News Fox News Fox News Fox News MNC Business MNC Business MNC Business MNC Business MNC News MNC News MNC News MNC News Russia Today Russia Today Russia Today Russia Today Sky News Sky News Sky News Sky News BabyTV BabyTV BabyTV BabyTV Boomerang Boomerang Boomerang Boomerang
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources
    SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radical Solution: the Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae Kristen Cella1, Leila Carmona2*, Irina Ekimova3,4, Anton Chichvarkhin3,5, Dimitry Schepetov6, Terrence M. Gosliner1 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 3 Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia, 4 Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, 5 A.V. Zhirmunsky Instutute of Marine Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia, 6 National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia a11111 * [email protected] Abstract Tergipedidae represents a diverse and successful group of aeolid nudibranchs, with approx- imately 200 species distributed throughout most marine ecosystems and spanning all bio- OPEN ACCESS geographical regions of the oceans. However, the systematics of this family remains poorly Citation: Cella K, Carmona L, Ekimova I, understood since no modern phylogenetic study has been undertaken to support any of the Chichvarkhin A, Schepetov D, Gosliner TM (2016) A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the proposed classifications. The present study is the first molecular phylogeny of Tergipedidae Nudibranch Family Fionidae. PLoS ONE 11(12): based on partial sequences of two mitochondrial (COI and 16S) genes and one nuclear e0167800. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167800 gene (H3). Maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian analysis were con- Editor: Geerat J. Vermeij, University of California, ducted in order to elucidate the systematics of this family. Our results do not recover the tra- UNITED STATES ditional Tergipedidae as monophyletic, since it belongs to a larger clade that includes the Received: July 7, 2016 families Eubranchidae, Fionidae and Calmidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Iii: Baseline Status and Cumulative Effects for the San Francisco Bay Listed Species
    ATTACHMENT III: BASELINE STATUS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY LISTED SPECIES 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: ALAMEDAWHIPSNAKE ............................................................................................ 6 1.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ...................................................................................... 6 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE........................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Factors affecting species within the action area ............................................... 6 1.2.1.1 Urban development .................................................................................... 7 1.2.1.2 Fire suppression ......................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.3 Predation .................................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.4 Grazing practices ..................................................................................... 10 1.2.1.5 Non-native species ................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Baseline Status ................................................................................................ 11 1.3 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 13 2: BAY CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY ....................................................................... 14 2.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marine Alien and Invasive Species
    Table 1: The list of 96 marine alien and invasive species recorded along the coastline of South Africa. Phylum Class Taxon Status Common name Natural Range ANNELIDA Polychaeta Alitta succinea Invasive pile worm or clam worm Atlantic coast ANNELIDA Polychaeta Boccardia proboscidea Invasive Shell worm Northern Pacific ANNELIDA Polychaeta Dodecaceria fewkesi Alien Black coral worm Pacific Northern America ANNELIDA Polychaeta Ficopomatus enigmaticus Invasive Estuarine tubeworm Australia ANNELIDA Polychaeta Janua pagenstecheri Alien N/A Europe ANNELIDA Polychaeta Neodexiospira brasiliensis Invasive A tubeworm West Indies, Brazil ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora websteri Alien oyster mudworm N/A ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora hoplura Invasive Mud worm Europe, Mediterranean ANNELIDA Polychaeta Simplaria pseudomilitaris Alien N/A Europe BRACHIOPODA Lingulata Discinisca tenuis Invasive Disc lamp shell Namibian Coast BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Virididentula dentata Invasive Blue dentate moss animal Indo-Pacific BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugulina flabellata Invasive N/A N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugula neritina Invasive Purple dentate mos animal N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Conopeum seurati Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Cryptosula pallasiana Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Watersipora subtorquata Invasive Red-rust bryozoan Caribbean CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Cladophora prolifera Invasive N/A N/A CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Codium fragile Invasive green sea fingers Korea CHORDATA Actinopterygii Cyprinus carpio Invasive Common carp Asia CHORDATA Ascidiacea
    [Show full text]
  • Title 9: Public Property, Public Works and Building Regulations
    TITLE 9: PUBLIC PROPERTY, PUBLIC WORKS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter Section Subject Page 9.05 Beaches and Piers 9.05.005 Definitions ................................................................ 01 9.05.010 Lifeguards ................................................................ 02 9.05.015 Beachcombing ......................................................... 02 9.05.020 Beach Closure ......................................................... 02 9.05.025 Encroachments ........................................................ 02 9.05.030 Public Clothing Changes .......................................... 02 9.05.035 Littering (Ord 1538 - 2005) ................................................ 03 9.05.040 Sand Removal ......................................................... 03 9.05.045 Aquatic Activities ...................................................... 03 9.05.050 Athletic Activities at Seal Way .................................. 03 9.05.055 Fires ......................................................................... 03 9.05.060 Smoking on Pier or Beach (Ord 1538 - 2005) ................... 04 9.05.065 Fishing ..................................................................... 04 9.05.070 Climbing, Diving and Jumping .................................. 04 9.05.075 Defacement of Pier .................................................. 04 9.05.080 Removal of Mussels ................................................. 04 9.05.085 Commercial Activities on Beach or Pier ................... 05 9.05.090 Vehicles and Animals ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • Steviari E. Outler Ecoiloiiiic Analysi S Division \Lolp? National Trailsportation Systcins Center
    ESTIMATING TtiE REGIONIIL ECOit'O:dIC SIGNIFICANCE OF A1RFORTS Steviari E. Outler Ecoiloiiiic Analysi s Division \lolp? National Trailsportation Systcins Center Lt>iircnceJ. Kiernail National Planning Divisicn ' Fedel-a1 Aviation Adii~inis1.raiiorl Preface Ciiapter 1 - Introduction 1.1 Furpose 1.2 A ' lieI4east1rcs 1.3 Applications Chaplsr 2 - Benefits Catc-gorics of Benniiis Transportation Kencfit Rules of T1it111:b Effect of !ncreas~dActivity Reduced Delays Cor;,:ilc~ni iy 6erii;ii t 5 Stimulation of Busin~ss Access to th; National Lirport Syste111 Recreat i on Commerciai Activities Chapter 3 - Economic Impacts 3.1 Dofi ni Lions of Ecor>o~iiicII;!;)?c~s 3.2 r e i Esiiil:ztes Chapter 4 - Preparation of an Ecorlo;ijic !mp:ct Assess!~ient Chapter 5 - Surniaary Appendices 8 Oe~-i%:atio~~of Iehl? 3-1 for Estiinating Expenditures p?r Visitor C Est ir~atingECOI~U;;I~C I!~![)acts Usirg th~ R!I-1S 1I 1~1~11tipli~rs References .Lis:?. of Tables Paae 2-1 Transportation Beneii t Variables 2-2 Approxiniate Denciiis for Various Activity Lev~ls 3 - 1 Expendi turer, psr \:'isi tor 3-2 ~lpproximataimpacts for Yari cus Activity tcvels 4-1 Iipproximatc Genefi ts ant1 linpzcis for \/arious Acti vi ty Levels 36 1'4- 1 Airports with riior!? than 1 ilil lion Passengers 11-3 U- 1 Original Data Set B- I 8-2 Final Form of the Data Set 3-2 6-3 Expenditures per Visitor, !907=100 8-3 B-4 Expenditures per Visitor, 1991=!00 fj-4 C- 1 Aviation RIWS II Code Numbers C-3 Fic~ureNo.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Fishes of California
    Inland Fishes of California Revise d and Expanded PETER B. MO YL E Illustrations by Chris Ma ri van Dyck and Joe Tome ller i NIVERS ITyor ALfFORNJA PRESS Ikrkd cr I.", ..\ n~d e ' Lon don Universit }, 0 Ca lifornia Press Herkdey and Los Angeles, Ca lifornia Uni ve rsity of alifornia Press, Ltd. Lundun, England ~ 2002 by the Regents of the Unive rsi ty of Ca lifornia Library of Cungress ataloging-in -Publ ica tion Data j\·[oyk, Pen: r B. Inland fis hes of California / Peter B. Moyle ; illustrations by Chris Mari van D)'ck and Joe Tomell eri.- Rev. and expanded. p. cm. In lu de> bibl iographical refe rences (p. ). ISBN 0- 20-2.2754 -'1 (cl ot h: alk. papa) I. rreshw:ltcr lishes-Cali(ornia. I. Title. QL62S C2 M6H 2002 597 .17/i'097Q4-dc21 20010 27680 1\!UlIl.Ifaclu rcd in Canacla II 10 Q9 00 07 06 0 04 03 02 10 ' 1\ 7 b '; -\ 3 2 1 Th paper u!)ed in thi> public.ltiu(] 111l'd., the minimum requirements "fA SI / i': ISO Z39.4H-1992 (R 199;) ( Pmlllllh'/l e ofPa pcr) . e Special Thanks The illustrations for this book were made possible by gra nts from the following : California-Nevada Chapter, American Fi she ries Soc iety Western Di vision, Am erican Fi she ries Society California Department of Fish and Game Giles W. and El ise G. Mead Foundation We appreciate the generous funding support toward the publication of this book by the United Sta tes Environme ntal Protection Agency, Region IX, San Francisco Contents Pre(acc ix Salmon and Trout, Salmonidae 242 Ackl10 11'ledgl11 el1ts Xlll Silversides, Atherinopsidae 307 COlll'er,<iol1 ['actors xv
    [Show full text]