DOCSLIB.ORG

Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/ Environmental Assessment March 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/ Environmental Assessment March 2011 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/ Environmental Assessment March 2011 Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/ Environmental Assessment March 2011 Vision Statement Tidal channels meandering through a sea of cordgrass deliver moisture and nourishment to support a healthy marsh ecosystem. As the quiet calm of the morning is interrupted by the clacking of a light-footed clapper rail, school children and other visitors, standing on the elevated observation deck, point with excitement in the direction of the call hoping for a glimpse of the rare bird. Shorebirds dart from one foraging area to another feasting on what appears to be an endless supply of food hidden within the tidal flats. California least terns fly above the tidal channels searching for small fish to carry back to their nests on NASA Island. A diverse array of marine organisms, from tube worms and sea stars to rays and sharks, and even an occasional green sea turtle, thrive within the tidal channels and open water areas of the Refuge’s diverse marsh complex, while Nelson’s sharp-tailed sparrows and other upland birds find food and shelter within the native upland vegetation that borders the marsh. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-1832 Sacramento, CA 95825-1846 March 2011 Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Assessment Orange County, California Type of Action: Administrative Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Responsible Official: Ren Lohoefener, Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region For Further Information: Victoria Touchstone, Refuge Planner San Diego NWR Complex 6010 Hidden Valley Road, Suite 101 Carlsbad, CA 92011 (760) 431-9440 extension 349 Abstract: This Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Assessment (CCP/EA) describes and evaluates various alternatives for managing the Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations, are described, compared, and assessed for the Seal Beach NWR. The three alternatives are summarized below: Alternative A – No Action: This alternative assumes no change from past management programs and serves as the baseline to which all other action alternatives are compared. There would be no major changes in habitat management or the current public use program under this alternative. Alternative B – Maximize Salt Marsh Restoration, Continue Current Public Uses: Under this alternative, current wildlife and habitat management activities would be expanded to include evaluation of current baseline data for fish, wildlife, and plants on the Refuge, identification of data gaps, implementation of species surveys to address data gaps as staff time and funding allows, and support for new research projects that would benefit Refuge resources and Refuge management. Also proposed is the restoration of approximately 22 acres of intertidal habitat (salt marsh and intertidal mudflat) and 15 acres of wetland/upland transition habitat. Pest control would be implemented in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program and mosquito monitoring and control would be guided by a Mosquito Management Plan. No changes to the current public use program are proposed. Alternative C (Proposed Action) – Optimize Upland/Wetland Restoration, Improve Opportunities for Wildlife Observation: The majority of the management activities, including the IPM program and Mosquito Management Plan, proposed in Alternative B would also be implemented under this Alternative. The primary difference between Alternatives B and C is that under Alternative C a larger portion of the areas to be restored would consist of upland and wetland/upland transition habitat. Approximately 12 acres of currently disturbed upland would be restored to native upland habitat, about 10 acres would be restored to wetland/upland transition habitat, and approximately 15 acres would be restored to intertidal habitat. In addition, Alternative C includes limited expansion of the current public use program, including expanded opportunities for wildlife observation. Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Assessment Abstract The issues addressed in this Draft CCP/EA include the potential effects of the various alternatives on the physical environment, biological and cultural resources, and the social/economic environment. The adverse and beneficial effects of implementing the alternatives are generally described in the following action categories: habitat and wildlife management, pest management, and public use. Providing Comments: Your comments on the Draft CCP/EA should be mailed, faxed, or emailed to the San Diego NWR Complex no later than May 11, 2011. Comments should be mailed to: Victoria Touchstone U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service San Diego NWR Complex 6010 Hidden Valley Road, Suite 101 Carlsbad, CA 92011 Faxed comments should be directed to Victoria Touchstone at (760) 930-0256 and emailed comments should be directed to [email protected] (please include “Seal Beach CCP” in the subject line). Comments should be provided to the Service during the public review period of this Draft CCP/EA. This will enable us to analyze and respond to the comments at one time and to use this input in the preparation of the Final CCP. Comments should be specific and should address the document’s adequacy and the merits of the alternatives described. Environmental objections that could have been raised at the draft stage may be waived if not raised until after the completion of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). All comments received from the public will be placed in the Service’s record for this action. As part of the record, comments will be made available for inspection by the general public, and copies may be provided to the public. For persons who do not wish to have their names and other identifying information made available, anonymous comments will be accepted. Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge Reader’s Guide The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will manage the Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in accordance with an approved Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP). This CCP provides long range guidance on Refuge management through its vision, goals, objectives, and strategies. The CCP also provides a basis for a long-term adaptive management process including implementation, monitoring progress, evaluating and adjusting, and revising plans accordingly. Additional step- down planning will be required prior to implementation of certain programs and projects. This document combines both a Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment (Draft CCP/EA). Following the completion of public review and evaluation of the comments received, the Service will identify the preferred alternative. Assuming no significant adverse effects are identified, the Service will also issue a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Once the FONSI is signed, the Final CCP will be prepared. The following chapter and appendix descriptions are provided to assist readers in locating and understanding the various components of the CCP/EA. Chapter 1, Introduction, includes the purpose of and need for the CCP and EA; an overview of the National Wildlife Refuge System; legal and policy guidance for planning for and managing the resources on National Wildlife Refuges; setting, regional context, and history of the Seal Beach NWR; and Refuge purposes, vision, and goals for future management. Chapter 2, The Planning Process, describes the CCP planning process, including the public involvement aspects of the process. This chapter also provides background on major planning issues identified by Refuge staff, Federal, Tribal, State, and local agencies, and/or the public, as well as a variety of management concerns and opportunities. Chapter 3, Alternatives, describes three management alternatives proposed for the Refuge. Each alternative represents a different approach to achieving the vision, goals, and objectives for the Refuge. Alternative A (No Action) describes current management practices. Alternative C is the proposed action. Chapter 4, Affected Environment, describes the existing physical and biological environment, public uses, cultural resources, and socioeconomic conditions. They represent baseline conditions for the comparisons made in Chapter 5. Chapter 5, Environmental Consequences, describes the potential impacts of each of the alternatives on the resources, programs, and conditions outlined in Chapter 4. Chapter 6, Implementation, presents the details of how the proposed action (Alternative C) for the Seal Beach NWR would be implemented if it is selected as the preferred alternative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Twenty Years of Surveillance for Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus In
    Oliver et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:362 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2950-1 RESEARCH Open Access Twenty years of surveillance for Eastern equine encephalitis virus in mosquitoes in New York State from 1993 to 2012 JoAnne Oliver1,2*, Gary Lukacik3, John Kokas4, Scott R. Campbell5, Laura D. Kramer6,7, James A. Sherwood1 and John J. Howard1 Abstract Background: The year 1971 was the first time in New York State (NYS) that Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) was identified in mosquitoes, in Culiseta melanura and Culiseta morsitans. At that time, state and county health departments began surveillance for EEEV in mosquitoes. Methods: From 1993 to 2012, county health departments continued voluntary participation with the state health department in mosquito and arbovirus surveillance. Adult female mosquitoes were trapped, identified, and pooled. Mosquito pools were tested for EEEV by Vero cell culture each of the twenty years. Beginning in 2000, mosquito extracts and cell culture supernatant were tested by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: During the years 1993 to 2012, EEEV was identified in: Culiseta melanura, Culiseta morsitans, Coquillettidia perturbans, Aedes canadensis (Ochlerotatus canadensis), Aedes vexans, Anopheles punctipennis, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Psorophora ferox, Culex salinarius, and Culex pipiens-restuans group. EEEV was detected in 427 adult mosquito pools of 107,156 pools tested totaling 3.96 million mosquitoes. Detections of EEEV occurred in three geographical regions of NYS: Sullivan County, Suffolk County, and the contiguous counties of Madison, Oneida, Onondaga and Oswego. Detections of EEEV in mosquitoes occurred every year from 2003 to 2012, inclusive. EEEV was not detected in 1995, and 1998 to 2002, inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Macrolepidopteran Moth (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in Miocene Dominican Amber
    ZooKeys 965: 73–84 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.965.54461 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new macrolepidopteran moth (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in Miocene Dominican amber Weiting Zhang1,2, Chungkun Shih3,4, YuHong Shih5, Dong Ren3 1 Hebei GEO University, 136 Huaiandonglu, Shijiazhuang 050031, China 2 State Key Laboratory of Pal- aeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China 3 College of Life Sciences and Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies, Capital Normal University, 105 Xisan- huanbeilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100048, China 4 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA 5 Laboratorio Dominicano De Ambar Y Gemas, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic Corresponding author: Weiting Zhang ([email protected]) Academic editor: Gunnar Brehm | Received 19 May 2020 | Accepted 12 August 2020 | Published 3 September 2020 http://zoobank.org/05E273DB-B590-42D1-8234-864A787BE6A0 Citation: Zhang W, Shih C, Shih YH, Ren D (2020) A new macrolepidopteran moth (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in Miocene Dominican amber. ZooKeys 965: 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.965.54461 Abstract A new genus and species of fossil moth, Miogeometrida chunjenshihi Zhang, Shih & Shih, gen. et sp. nov., assigned to Geometridae, is described from Miocene Dominican amber dating from 15–20 Mya. The new genus is characterized by the forewing without a fovea, R1 not anastomosing with Sc, no areole formed by veins R1 and Rs, R1 and Rs1 completely coincident, M2 arising midway between M1 and M3, anal veins 1A and 2A fused for their entire lengths; and the hind wing with Rs running close to Sc + R1 and M2 absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Description of Project
    Detailed Background on Existing Resource Conditions in Project/Study Area Giacomini Wetland Restoration Project Golden Gate National Recreation Area/ Point Reyes National Seashore Land Use: The Giacomini Ranch has been used for dairy farming since 1917. The Giacominis established their operation in the 1940s with diking of what is now referred to as the East and West Pastures and are still farming the ranch currently. The National Park Service’s reservation of use agreement with the Giacominis ends in 2007 at which the dairy operation will cease, and the entire 563 acres will be under the National Park Service (Park Service) ownership and management. Olema Marsh, which is directly south of the Giacomini Ranch in the Olema Valley, has been owned by the non-profit organization, Audubon Canyon Ranch. The marsh is primarily used by the public for walking, birding, and sightseeing opportunities. The West Marin area, including Point Reyes National Seashore (Seashore) and north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), is largely rural and comprised of agricultural operations and small residential communities. The dominant type of agriculture within the region is dairy and beef cattle operations. South of Olema Marsh lies pasturelands that are owned by the Park Service and grazed under lease by beef cattle. Leased beef cattle grazing also occurs near Park Service land at Railroad Point northeast of the Giacomini Ranch. Otherwise, most of the Giacomini Ranch and Olema Marsh is surrounded by the towns of Point Reyes Station and Inverness Park, which consist largely of residential homes and small businesses. To the north of Giacomini Ranch lies undiked marshlands that are owned by the State Lands Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunrise Beverage 2021 Craft Soda Price Guide Office 800.875.0205
    SUNRISE BEVERAGE 2021 CRAFT SODA PRICE GUIDE OFFICE 800.875.0205 Donnie Shinn Sales Mgr 704.310.1510 Ed Saul Mgr 336.596.5846 BUY 20 CASES GET $1 OFF PER CASE Email to:[email protected] SODA PRICE QUANTITY Boylan Root Beer 24.95 Boylan Diet Root Beer 24.95 Boylan Black Cherry 24.95 Boylan Diet Black Cherry 24.95 Boylan Ginger Ale 24.95 Boylan Diet Ginger Ale 24.95 Boylan Creme 24.95 Boylan Diet Creme 24.95 Boylan Birch 24.95 Boylan Creamy Red Birch 24.95 Boylan Cola 24.95 Boylan Diet Cola 24.95 Boylan Orange 24.95 Boylan Grape 24.95 Boylan Sparkling Lemonade 24.95 Boylan Shirley Temple 24.95 Boylan Original Seltzer 24.95 Boylan Raspberry Seltzer 24.95 Boylan Lime Seltzer 24.95 Boylan Lemon Seltzer 24.95 Boylan Heritage Tonic 10oz 29.95 Uncle Scott’s Root Beer 28.95 Virgil’s Root Beer 26.95 Virgil’s Black Cherry 26.95 Virgil’s Vanilla Cream 26.95 Virgil’s Orange 26.95 Flying Cauldron Butterscotch Beer 26.95 Bavarian Nutmeg Root Beer 16.9oz 39.95 Reed’s Original Ginger Brew 26.95 Reed’s Extra Ginger Brew 26.95 Reed’s Zero Extra Ginger Brew 26.95 Reed’s Strongest Ginger Brew 26.95 Virgil’s Zero Root Beer Cans 17.25 Virgil’s Zero Black Cherry Cans 17.25 Virgil’s Zero Vanilla Cream Cans 17.25 Virgil’s Zero Cola Cans 17.25 Reed’s Extra Cans 26.95 Reed’s Zero Extra Cans 26.95 Reed’s Real Ginger Ale Cans 16.95 Reed’s Zero Ginger Ale Cans 16.95 Maine Root Mexican Cola 28.95 Maine Root Lemon Lime 28.95 Maine Root Root Beer 28.95 Maine Root Sarsaparilla 28.95 Maine Root Mandarin Orange 28.95 Maine Root Spicy Ginger Beer 28.95 Maine Root Blueberry 28.95 Maine Root Lemonade 12ct 19.95 Blenheim Regular Ginger Ale 28.95 Blenheim Hot Ginger Ale 28.95 Blenheim Diet Ginger Ale 28.95 Cock & Bull Ginger Beer 24.95 Cock & Bull Apple Ginger Beer 24.95 Double Cola 24.95 Sunkist Orange 24.95 Vernor’s Ginger Ale 24.95 Red Rock Ginger Ale 24.95 Cheerwine 24.95 Diet Cheerwine 24.95 Sundrop 24.95 RC Cola 24.95 Nehi Grape 24.95 Nehi Orange 24.95 Nehi Peach 24.95 A&W Root Beer 24.95 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key for Mosquito Species
    ‘Reverse’ identification key for mosquito species More and more people are getting involved in the surveillance of invasive mosquito species Species name used Synonyms Common name in the EU/EEA, not just professionals with formal training in entomology. There are many in the key taxonomic keys available for identifying mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance, but they are almost all designed for professionally trained entomologists. Aedes aegypti Stegomyia aegypti Yellow fever mosquito The current identification key aims to provide non-specialists with a simple mosquito recog- Aedes albopictus Stegomyia albopicta Tiger mosquito nition tool for distinguishing between invasive mosquito species and native ones. On the Hulecoeteomyia japonica Asian bush or rock pool Aedes japonicus japonicus ‘female’ illustration page (p. 4) you can select the species that best resembles the specimen. On japonica mosquito the species-specific pages you will find additional information on those species that can easily be confused with that selected, so you can check these additional pages as well. Aedes koreicus Hulecoeteomyia koreica American Eastern tree hole Aedes triseriatus Ochlerotatus triseriatus This key provides the non-specialist with reference material to help recognise an invasive mosquito mosquito species and gives details on the morphology (in the species-specific pages) to help with verification and the compiling of a final list of candidates. The key displays six invasive Aedes atropalpus Georgecraigius atropalpus American rock pool mosquito mosquito species that are present in the EU/EEA or have been intercepted in the past. It also contains nine native species. The native species have been selected based on their morpho- Aedes cretinus Stegomyia cretina logical similarity with the invasive species, the likelihood of encountering them, whether they Aedes geniculatus Dahliana geniculata bite humans and how common they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Beach Water Department [ Vii ] J CONTENTS TABLES (Continued) Page Nlllllvcr Page LETTER of Transmitral
    WATER DEPARTMENT CITY OF LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA HISTORY AND ANNUAL REPORT -.k 1943 - 1944 , i --_.--- ---- --- WATER DEPARTMENT CITY OF LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL SKETCH and ANNUAL REPORT July 1, 1943 to June 30, 1944 I i I I LONG BEACH 1944 Dedicated to tile memory of GEORGE ROYAL WADE, beloved GenerallY!ana!ler of tIle Long Beach Waler Department from December 19, 1940, to November 24-, 19#. under 'Whose direction tile book 'Was pre­ pared. His great desire -'Was to see it in print, but the Supreme Architect of tile Universe 'Willed otherwise and called him while it was still unfillislud. ---------------~ • ~ drop of water~ taken up from the ocean by a Slln­ healll~ shall fall as a snowflake upon the moun/a"in top, rest in the frozen silence through the long winter~ stir again under the summer sun and seek to find its way back to the sea down the granite steeps and fissures. It shall join its fellows in mad frolics in mountain gorgesJ singing the song of falling waters and dancing with the fairies in the moonlight. It shall lie upon the bosom of a crystal lake, and forget for a while its quest of the ocean level. Again it shall obey the law and resume its journey with mUT111urSflnd !rettinULo and then it shall pass out of the sunlight and the free air and be borne along a weary way in darkness and silence. for many days. And at last the drop that fell as a snowflake upon the Sierra)s crest and set out to find its home in the sea) shall be taken up from beneath the ground by a thirsty rootlet and distilled into the perfume of an orange blossom in a garden .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • SAVANNAH SPARROW Passerculus Sandwichensis Non-Breeding Visitor, Vagrant P.S
    SAVANNAH SPARROW Passerculus sandwichensis non-breeding visitor, vagrant P.s. sandwichensis Group Savannah Sparrows breed throughout N America and winter S to the Caribbean and n. C America. Vagrants have reached Europe, ne. Asia, and Japan (Cramp and Perrins 1994b, AOU 1998). One was observed on Kure, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, 29 Nov-6 Dec 1977 (Rauzon 1978) and another was observed for two hours and photographed on Tern I, French Frigate 3 Oct 1980 (HRBP 1099). An "unidentified American sparrow" reported from Midway 20 Sep 1995 may also have been a Savannah Sparrow. Up to 22 subspecies of Savannah Sparrow have been named (Pyle 1997b, Clement et al. 2016), The individuals on Kure and French Frigate cannot be placed to subspecies, although the description and photograph indicate the widespread and expected P.s. sandwichensis group that breeds throughout most of N America and is the most migratory (AOU 1998). Within this group, the nominate subspecies (sandwichensis) and anthinus, each breeding in Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and migrating to California and w. Mexico, would be the most likely to occur in the Hawaiian Islands; the description and photograph can be considered consistent with these two subspecies but do not eliminate other subspecies within the group. Dole (1869, 1879) and Sclater (1871) listed Savannah Sparrow ("Emberiza sandwicensis") and Golden-crowned Sparrow for Hawaii but this was in error, apparently based on Dole's confusing the Sandwich Islands and Latham's "Sandwich Sound" (Prince William Sound) in Alaska (Rothschild 1900, Medway 1981). Acronyms and Abbreviations Literature cited Citation: Pyle, R.L., and P.
    [Show full text]
  • L O U I S I a N A
    L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS Written by Bill Fontenot and Richard DeMay Photography by Greg Lavaty and Richard DeMay Designed and Illustrated by Diane K. Baker What is a Sparrow? Generally, sparrows are characterized as New World sparrows belong to the bird small, gray or brown-streaked, conical-billed family Emberizidae. Here in North America, birds that live on or near the ground. The sparrows are divided into 13 genera, which also cryptic blend of gray, white, black, and brown includes the towhees (genus Pipilo), longspurs hues which comprise a typical sparrow’s color (genus Calcarius), juncos (genus Junco), and pattern is the result of tens of thousands of Lark Bunting (genus Calamospiza) – all of sparrow generations living in grassland and which are technically sparrows. Emberizidae is brushland habitats. The triangular or cone- a large family, containing well over 300 species shaped bills inherent to most all sparrow species are perfectly adapted for a life of granivory – of crushing and husking seeds. “Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Sparrows possess well-developed claws on their toes, the evolutionary result of so much time spent on the ground, scratching for seeds only seven species breed here...” through leaf litter and other duff. Additionally, worldwide, 50 of which occur in the United most species incorporate a substantial amount States on a regular basis, and 33 of which have of insect, spider, snail, and other invertebrate been recorded for Louisiana. food items into their diets, especially during Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Opposite page: Bachman Sparrow the spring and summer months.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study/Environmental Assessment: Kent Island Restoration at Bolinas Lagoon
    DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON Marin County Open Space District and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District August 2012 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON PREPARED FOR Marin County Open Space District Marin County Civic Center 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 260 San Rafael, CA 94903 (415) 499-6387 and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District 1455 Market St San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 503-6703 PREPARED BY Carmen Ecological Consulting Grassetti Environmental Consulting Peter R. Baye, Coastal Ecologist, Botanist August 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Document Structure ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................3 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................3 2.2 Environmental Setting ..............................................................................................................3 2.3 Purpose and Need ..............................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Box O' Sandwiches
    Name ___________________________________________________________ 300 Ren Center , Ste 1304 Page of (Renaissance Center) Company _________________________________________________________ Address __________________________________________________________ (313) 566-0028 (313) 567-6527 City ___________________________ Phone ____________________________ Fax your order, then call to confirm your order. Fax your order ahead for pick-up. No need to wait in line — go right to the register. Desired date __________ Desired time ________ am / pm PICK-UP or DELIVERY Order online at * Payment: Cash Credit (please have credit card info ready when calling to confirm) *Delivery varies by location, call your local shop for more info. Potbelly.com ORIGINALS SKINNYS Drinks Shakes /Malts /Smoothies Turkey Breast CANNED SODA LOW_FAT A Wreck® How many of FLAVOR ShAKE MALT Circle your choice Less meat & cheese Coke Diet SmoothIE 1 Italian on“Thin-Cut” bread 2 each sandwich? Box O’ Sandwiches Chocolate Roast Beef with 25% less fat REGULAR OR Wheat BOTTLED DRINKS of Box below Meatball than Originals 20oz Coke Diet Chicken Salad Strawberry T-K-Y TURKEY BREAST ______R _____ W Smoked Ham 20oz Coke Zero Mushroom Melt ® Tuna Salad A WRECK ______R _____ W Vanilla Hammie 20oz Sprite Vegetarian italian ______R _____ W 500ml Crystal Geyser Water Pizza Sandwich Banana Grilled Chicken ROAST BEEF ______R _____ W 750ml Crystal Geyser Water MeatbaLL ______R _____ W Boylan Black Cherry Oreo® FULL BELLY CHICKEN SALAD ______R _____ W If you ordered IBC Cream Soda Sandwich, Deli
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Ecology Provincial Resources
    MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WILDLIFE ECOLOGY PROVINCIAL RESOURCES !1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank: Olwyn Friesen (PhD Ecology) for compiling, writing, and editing this document. Subject Experts and Editors: Barbara Fuller (Project Editor, Chair of Test Writing and Education Committee) Lindsey Andronak (Soils, Research Technician, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) Jennifer Corvino (Wildlife Ecology, Senior Park Interpreter, Spruce Woods Provincial Park) Cary Hamel (Plant Ecology, Director of Conservation, Nature Conservancy Canada) Lee Hrenchuk (Aquatic Ecology, Biologist, IISD Experimental Lakes Area) Justin Reid (Integrated Watershed Management, Manager, La Salle Redboine Conservation District) Jacqueline Monteith (Climate Change in the North, Science Consultant, Frontier School Division) SPONSORS !2 Introduction to wildlife ...................................................................................7 Ecology ....................................................................................................................7 Habitat ...................................................................................................................................8 Carrying capacity.................................................................................................................... 9 Population dynamics ..............................................................................................................10 Basic groups of wildlife ................................................................................11
    [Show full text]