DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Ocean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Ocean 124° 123° 122° 121° 42° 42° 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 ° 32 41° 41 31 29 30 27 28 26 25 24 23 22 21 ° ° 40 20 40 19 18 17 16 15 PACIFIC OCEAN 14 13 ° ° 39 12 39 11 10 9 8 6 7 4 5 20 0 20 3 MILES 1 2 38° 38° 124° 123° 122° 121° Prepared for: Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department Of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sacramento, California Seattle, Washington Prepared by: RESEARCH PLANNING, INC. Columbia, SC 29202 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 123°00’00" 122°52’30" 38°07’30" 38°07’30" TOMALES BAY STATE PARK P O I N T R E Y E S N A T I O N A L S E A S H O R E ESTERO DE LIMANTOUR RESERVE POINT REYES NATIONAL SEASHORE 38°00’00" 38°00’00" POINT REYES HEADLAND RESERVE GULF OF THE FARALLONES NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY 123°00’00" 122°52’30" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1.50 1KILOMETER 1.50 1MILE PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 DRAKES BAY, CALIF. (1976) NC 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 122°52’30" 122°45’00" 38°07’30" TOMALES BAY 38°07’30" STATE PARK TOMALES BAY TOMALES BAY STATE PARK STATE PARK Millerton GULF OF THE FARALLONES Inverness NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY TOMALES BAY ECOLOGICAL RESERVE POINT REYES NATIONAL SEASHORE 122°52’30" 122°45’00" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1.50 1KILOMETER 1 .5 0 1 MILE POINT REYES NE, CALIF. (1976) PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 INVERNESS, CALIF. (1976) NC 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 123°00’00" 122°52’30" 38°15’00" 38°15’00" BIRD ROCK ASBS Vincent Landing Nicks Cove Blakes Landing Cypress Grove Lairds Landing Sacramento Landing STATE PARK POINT REYES NATIONAL SEASHORE GULF OF THE FARALLONS NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY POINT REYES NATIONAL SEASHORE TOMALES BAY 38°07’30" 38°07’30" 123°00’00" 122°52’30" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1.50 1KILOMETER 1 .5 0 1 MILE PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 TOMALES, CALIF. (1976) NC 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 123°00’00" 122°52’30" 38°22’30" 38°22’30" GULF OF THE FARALLONES NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY 38°15’00" 38°15’00" 123°00’00" 122°52’30" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1.50 1KILOMETER 1 .5 0 1 MILE PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 VALLEY FORD, CALIF. (1971) NC 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 123°07’30" 123°00’00" 38°22’30" 38°22’30" SONOMA COAST STATE BEACH BEACH STATE SONOMA COAST BODEGA MARINE LIFE REFUGE DORAN REGIONAL PARK SONOMA COAST STATE BEACH BODEGA HEAD GULF OF THE FARALLONES NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY 38°15’00" 38°15’00" 123°07’30" 123°00’00" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1.50 1KILOMETER 1 .5 0 1 MILE PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 BODEGA HEAD, CALIF. (1972) NC 5 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 123°07’30" 123°00’00" 38°30’00" 38°30’00" STATE BEACH STATE STATE BEACH SONOMA COAST COAST SONOMA COAST STATE BEACH SONOMA SONOMA COAST STATE BEACH 38°22’30" 38°22’30" 123°07’30" 123°00’00" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1.50 1KILOMETER 1 .5 0 1 MILE PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 DUNCANS MILLS, CALIF.(1979) NC 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 123°15’00" 123°07’30" FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK 38°30’00" 38°30’00" SONOMA COAST STATE BEACH RUSSIAN GULCH SONOMA COAST STATE BEACH SONOMA COAST STATE BEACH 123°15’00" 123°07’30" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1.50 1KILOMETER 1 .5 0 1 MILE FORT ROSS, CALIF.(1978) PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 ARCHED ROCK, CALIF. (1977) NC 7 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX MAP 123°22’30" 123°15’00" 38°37’30" 38°37’30" K R A P E T A T S T IN O P T L A S K R A P E T A T S T N I O RE P E SE T RV T TA E L S A RHODODENDRON S KRUSE SALT POINT STATE PARK S A L T P O I N T GERSTLE COVE ASBS S T A T E P A R K SALT POINT STATE PARK OCEAN COVE RESERVE FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK 38°30’00" 38°30’00" 123°22’30" 123°15’00" ATMOSPH ND ER A IC IC A N D A M E I Prepared for C N O I S L T R A A N T O I I O T N A N U . E S. RC DE E PA MM RTMENT OF CO Office of HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OIL SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE and ASSESSMENT DIVISION California Department of Fish and Game National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER 1.50 1MILE PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 1994 PLANTATION, CALIF. (1977) NC 8 H123 123 Guidelines for Interpreting ESI Maps To help users interpret the ESI maps and tabular data, we offer the following guidelines for use in addition to the map legend: • Shoreline Habitats. The “shoreline,” representing the boundary between land and water, is color-coded with the ESI classification. Most shoreline habitats are shown as a line, with no areal dimension. Where there is more than one shoreline type (e.g., a beach in front of a seawall), the colors for each habitat are shown, with the color for the landward habitat on the land side of the shoreline and the color for the seaward habitat on the water side. In areas where the intertidal zone is wide (e.g., wide tidal flats, wave-cut rocky platforms), the habitat from high to low water is filled with the ESI classification color. When data are available, the entire extent of wetlands are filled with colored patterns. The seaward edge of the wetland is color-coded with the ESI classification; the landward extent of the wetland is indicated by a dashed, colored line. • Biological Resources. The distribution of biological resources is shown using many different conventions. The major convention is an icon associated with a point, line, or polygon that shows the species’ areal distribution. The icon’s reference number corresponds to a data table with details on species and life history. Biological resource data are organized into six major groups, each with a reference color: birds (green), mammals (brown), fish (blue), shellfish (orange), reptiles (red), and rare/endangered plants and special habitats (purple). These colors are used to fill hatched polygons and the icons. Each major group has subgroups with unique icons to visually indicate the type of organism or feature present. The icon or group of icons is usually located inside the polygon it represents; however, sometimes a line is connected between the icon and the polygon or point to make it easier to relate the two.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief Description of Project
    Detailed Background on Existing Resource Conditions in Project/Study Area Giacomini Wetland Restoration Project Golden Gate National Recreation Area/ Point Reyes National Seashore Land Use: The Giacomini Ranch has been used for dairy farming since 1917. The Giacominis established their operation in the 1940s with diking of what is now referred to as the East and West Pastures and are still farming the ranch currently. The National Park Service’s reservation of use agreement with the Giacominis ends in 2007 at which the dairy operation will cease, and the entire 563 acres will be under the National Park Service (Park Service) ownership and management. Olema Marsh, which is directly south of the Giacomini Ranch in the Olema Valley, has been owned by the non-profit organization, Audubon Canyon Ranch. The marsh is primarily used by the public for walking, birding, and sightseeing opportunities. The West Marin area, including Point Reyes National Seashore (Seashore) and north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), is largely rural and comprised of agricultural operations and small residential communities. The dominant type of agriculture within the region is dairy and beef cattle operations. South of Olema Marsh lies pasturelands that are owned by the Park Service and grazed under lease by beef cattle. Leased beef cattle grazing also occurs near Park Service land at Railroad Point northeast of the Giacomini Ranch. Otherwise, most of the Giacomini Ranch and Olema Marsh is surrounded by the towns of Point Reyes Station and Inverness Park, which consist largely of residential homes and small businesses. To the north of Giacomini Ranch lies undiked marshlands that are owned by the State Lands Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    Board of Directors Board Meeting Packet March 17, 2020 Clerk of the Board YOLANDE BARIAL KNIGHT (510) 544-2020 PH MEMO to the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (510) 569-1417 FAX EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors ELLEN CORBETT The Regular Session of the MARCH 17, 2020 President - Ward 4 Board Meeting is scheduled to commence at 1:00 p.m. at the EBRPD Administration Building, DEE ROSARIO 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland Vice President – Ward 2 BEVERLY LANE Secretary - Ward 6 COLIN COFFEY Treasurer - Ward 7 Respectfully submitted, DENNIS WAESPI Ward 3 AYN WIESKAMP Ward 5 ROBERT E. DOYLE ELIZABETH ECHOLS General Manager Ward 1 ROBERT E. DOYLE General Manager 2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, CA 94605-0381 (888) 327-2757 MAIN (510) 633-0460 TDD (510) 635-5502 FAX ebparks.org AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2020 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT The Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District will hold a regular 11:30 a.m. ROLL CALL (Board Conference Room) meeting at District’s Administration Building, 2950 PUBLIC COMMENTS Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland, CA, commencing at 11:30 a.m. for Closed Session and 1:00 p.m. for Open Session on Tuesday, CLOSED SESSION March 17, 2020. A. Conference with Labor Negotiator: Government Code Section 54957.6 Agenda for the meeting is listed adjacent. Times for agenda items are approximate only and 1. Agency Negotiator: Robert E. Doyle, Ana M. Alvarez, are subject to change during the Kip Walsh meeting. If you wish to speak on Employee Organizations: AFSCME Local 2428, matters not on the agenda, you Police Association may do so under Public Comments at the beginning of Unrepresented Employees: Managers, Confidentials and Seasonals the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study/Environmental Assessment: Kent Island Restoration at Bolinas Lagoon
    DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON Marin County Open Space District and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District August 2012 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON PREPARED FOR Marin County Open Space District Marin County Civic Center 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 260 San Rafael, CA 94903 (415) 499-6387 and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District 1455 Market St San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 503-6703 PREPARED BY Carmen Ecological Consulting Grassetti Environmental Consulting Peter R. Baye, Coastal Ecologist, Botanist August 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Document Structure ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................3 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................3 2.2 Environmental Setting ..............................................................................................................3 2.3 Purpose and Need ..............................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised July 11, 2000
    Revised January 29, 2013 U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Upper Mississippi Valley/ Great Lakes Regional Shorebird Conservation Plan Version 1.0 Prepared by1: Ferenc de Szalay, Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio Doug Helmers, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Columbia, Missouri Dale Humburg, Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, Missouri Stephen J. Lewis, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota Barbara Pardo, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota Mark Shieldcastle, Ohio Division of Wildlife, Oak Harbor, Ohio May, 2000 1 Authors are listed alphabetically. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE UMVGL REGION ................................................................................ 2 Physical Description ............................................................................................................... 2 Bird Conservation Regions ..................................................................................................... 2 Shorebird Habitats in the UMVGL ......................................................................................... 3 Human Impacts on Shorebird habitat in the UMVGL Region ............................................... 4 SHOREBIRD SPECIES
    [Show full text]
  • List of Species Likely to Benefit from Marine Protected Areas in The
    Appendix C: Species Likely to Benefit from MPAs andSpecial-Status Species This appendix contains two sections: C.1 Species likely to benefit from marine protected areas in the MLPA South Coast Study Region C.2 Special status species likely to occur in the MLPA South Coast Study Region C.1 Species Likely to Benefit From MPAs The Marine Life Protection Act requires that species likely to benefit from MPAs be identified; identification of these species will contribute to the identification of habitat areas that will support achieving the goals of the MLPA. The California Marine Life Protection Act Master Plan for Marine Protected Areas (DFG 2008) includes a broad list of species likely to benefit from protection within MPAs. The master plan also indicates that regional lists will be developed by the MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team (SAT) for each study region described in the master plan. A list of species likely to benefit for the MLPA South Coast Study Region (Point Conception in Santa Barbara County to the California/Mexico border in San Diego County) has been compiled and approved by the SAT. The SAT used a scoring system to develop the list of species likely to benefit. This scoring system was developed to provide a metric that is more useful when comparing species than a simple on/off the list metric. Each species was scored using “1” to indicate a criterion was met or “0” to indicate a criterion was not met. Species on the list meet the following filtering criteria: they occur in the study region, they must score a “1” for either
    [Show full text]
  • Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan and Development
    Marin County Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan & Development Code Proposed Amendments Planning Commission Approved Draft Recommended to the Board of Supervisors February 13, 2012 Marin County Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan Proposed Amendments Planning Commission Approved Draft Recommended to the Board of Supervisors February 13, 2012 MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Land Use Plan Amendments Planning Commission Approved Draft Recommended to the Board of Supervisors February 13, 2012 Marin County Planning Commission Peter Theran, Chair, District #5 Joan Lubamersky, Vice-Chair, District #2 Don Dickenson, District #1 Randy L. Greenberg, District #3 Wade B. Holland, District #4 Katherine Crecelius, At Large Mark Ginalski, At Large Prepared by the Marin County Community Development Agency Brian C. Crawford, Director This report is funded in part with qualified outer continental shelf oil and gas revenues by the Coastal Impact Assistance Program, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, U.S. Department of the Interior. Marin County Local Coastal Program Project Staff Tom Lai, Assistant Director Jack Liebster, Principal Planner Kristin Drumm, Senior Planner Christine Gimmler, Senior Planner Jeremy Tejirian, Principal Planner Veronica Corella-Pearson Alisa Stevenson, Assistant Planner Katherine Mindel Jones, Assistant Planner Steve Scholl, Consulting Planner Cover photos courtesy of: Lea Adams, Dianne Arrigoni, Sue Petterson, and Devin Wilson Copies of this report may be obtained by contacting the Marin County Community
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Ecology Provincial Resources
    MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WILDLIFE ECOLOGY PROVINCIAL RESOURCES !1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank: Olwyn Friesen (PhD Ecology) for compiling, writing, and editing this document. Subject Experts and Editors: Barbara Fuller (Project Editor, Chair of Test Writing and Education Committee) Lindsey Andronak (Soils, Research Technician, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) Jennifer Corvino (Wildlife Ecology, Senior Park Interpreter, Spruce Woods Provincial Park) Cary Hamel (Plant Ecology, Director of Conservation, Nature Conservancy Canada) Lee Hrenchuk (Aquatic Ecology, Biologist, IISD Experimental Lakes Area) Justin Reid (Integrated Watershed Management, Manager, La Salle Redboine Conservation District) Jacqueline Monteith (Climate Change in the North, Science Consultant, Frontier School Division) SPONSORS !2 Introduction to wildlife ...................................................................................7 Ecology ....................................................................................................................7 Habitat ...................................................................................................................................8 Carrying capacity.................................................................................................................... 9 Population dynamics ..............................................................................................................10 Basic groups of wildlife ................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Bird-A-Thon San Diego County Team: Date
    Stilts & Avocets Forster's Tern Red-tailed Hawk Bird-a-Thon Pheasants & Turkeys Black-necked Stilt Royal Tern Barn Owls Ring-necked Pheasant American Avocet Elegant Tern Barn Owl San Diego County Wild Turkey Plovers Black Skimmer Typical Owls Grebes Black-bellied Plover Loons Western Screech-Owl Pied-billed Grebe Snowy Plover Common Loon Great Horned Owl Team: Eared Grebe Semipalmated Plover Cormorants Burrowing Owl Western Grebe Killdeer Brandt's Cormorant Kingfishers Date: Clark's Grebe Sandpipers & Phalaropes Double-crested Cormorant Belted Kingfisher Ducks, Geese & Swans Pigeons & Doves Whimbrel Pelicans Rock Pigeon Brant Long-billed Curlew American White Pelican Woodpeckers Canada Goose Band-tailed Pigeon Marbled Godwit Brown Pelican Acorn Woodpecker Eurasian Collared-Dove Wood Duck Black Turnstone Bitterns, Herons & Egrets Downy Woodpecker Common Ground-Dove Blue-winged Teal Sanderling Great Blue Heron Nuttall's Woodpecker White-winged Dove Cinnamon Teal Least Sandpiper Great Egret Northern Flicker Mourning Dove Northern Shoveler Western Sandpiper Snowy Egret Caracaras & Falcons Cuckoos, Roadrunners & Anis Short-billed Dowitcher Little Blue Heron Gadwall American Kestrel Greater Roadrunner Eurasian Wigeon Long-billed Dowitcher Green Heron Peregrine Falcon Swifts American Wigeon Spotted Sandpiper Black-crowned Night-Heron New World Parrots Vaux's Swift Wandering Tattler Yellow-crowned Night-Heron Mallard Red-crowned Parrot White-throated Swift Northern Pintail Willet Ibises & Spoonbills Red-maked Parakeet Hummingbirds Green-winged
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Long-Billed Curlew Numenius Americanus in Peru and Other Observations of Nearctic Waders at the Virilla Estuary Nathan R
    Cotinga 26 First record of Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus in Peru and other observations of Nearctic waders at the Virilla estuary Nathan R. Senner Received 6 February 2006; final revision accepted 21 March 2006 Cotinga 26(2006): 39–42 Hay poca información sobre las rutas de migración y el uso de los sitios de la costa peruana por chorlos nearcticos. En el fin de agosto 2004 yo reconocí el estuario de Virilla en el dpto. Piura en el noroeste de Peru para identificar los sitios de descanso para los Limosa haemastica en su ruta de migración al sur y aprender más sobre la migración de chorlos nearcticos en Peru. En Virilla yo observí más de 2.000 individuales de 23 especios de chorlos nearcticos y el primer registro de Numenius americanus de Peru, la concentración más grande de Limosa fedoa en Peru, y una concentración excepcional de Limosa haemastica. La combinación de esas observaciones y los resultados de un estudio anterior en el invierno boreal sugiere la posibilidad que Virilla sea muy importante para chorlos nearcticos en Peru. Las observaciones, también, demuestren la necesidad hacer más estudios en la costa peruana durante el año entero, no solemente durante el punto máximo de la migración de chorlos entre septiembre y noviembre. Shorebirds are poorly known in Peru away from bordered for a few hundred metres by sand and established study sites such as Paracas reserve, gravel before low bluffs rise c.30 m. Very little dpto. Ica, and those close to metropolitan areas vegetation grows here, although cows, goats and frequented by visiting birdwatchers and tour pigs owned by Parachique residents graze the area.
    [Show full text]
  • American Avocet Breeding Habitat, Behaviour and Use of Nesting Platforms at Kelowna, British Columbia
    Avocet breeding habitat, behaviour, and nesting platform use ­ Gyug and Weir 13 American Avocet breeding habitat, behaviour and use of nesting platforms at Kelowna, British Columbia Les W. Gyug1 and Jason T. Weir2 1 Okanagan Wildlife Consulting, 3130 Ensign Way, West Kelowna, BC V4T 1T9 [email protected] 2 Dept. of Biological Sciences and Dept. of Ecology and Evolution, University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4 [email protected] Abstract: The largest and most consistently used American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) colony in British Columbia is located in the southern half of the former Alki Lake, Kelowna. This lake was a landfill active from the 1960’s to 1980’s, and is now slated to be filled in completely as the landfill re­expands into the remnants of the lake. Here, we report avocet behaviour, nest conditions and foraging habitat characteristics in 1999 at Alki Lake and five other wetlands in the Kelowna area to inform future mitigation strategies for this colony. Thirteen breeding pairs initiated 21 nests (including renesting after failed attempts) at Alki Lake in 1999, with no nests in other Kelowna area localities. Fifteen nests were on islands, five on 1.2­ m square floating nest platforms, and one on a shoreline mudflat. Nesting on floating nest platforms had not been previously reported for American Avocets. Foraging areas regularly used by individual pairs were not necessarily adjacent to the nest, and increased from 0.32 ha during the incubation period to 0.53 ha after hatching. Avocets foraged primarily in soft silt substrates along non­vegetated shorelines and in shallow mudflats at a mean depth of 10 cm.
    [Show full text]