Arxiv:1705.08899V1

arXiv:1705.08899v1 [astro-ph.GA] 24 May 2017 ∼ a on fve,oecnepc htasnl super- single a condense that to expect able can be one would view, nova of point cal utoto rgntr nams range mass a in progenitors of out dust ntecup jcao asoeaA ihvle rang- values with A, condensed Cassiopeia al. from dust et of of Bevan ejecta ing mass clumpy and large the (2017) a in derived al. also et have Looze (2016) mass De initial recently, with More star progenitor a ∼ of explosion the after h cino hra n iei pteigad nthe in by collisions and, grain-grain eroded sputtering in heavily disrupted kinetic turbulence, be and of the presence thermal might of of grains end aggregates action the dust the larger not these is of into as That story, grains formation 2015). Cherchneff small the & and (Sarangi of 2016) favors Cherchneff coagulation & SNRs, (Biscaro the dust many of quantities in large observed (“clumpiness”), ejecta SN as in inhomogeneities of presence nteeet fasproarmat(N) producing (SNR), remnant dust supernova of a condensation of ∼ the ejecta for the most far in the so provides evidence the From 1987A compelling 1990). SN Bouchet 1967; & perspective, al. Suntzeff observational et 1989; al. Cernuschi example et ef- for Moseley massive (see the onto dust elements for of quantities refractory conditions super- of appropriate and condensation core-collapse the ficient theoretically of meet both ejecta (SN) novae shown, the extensively that observationally, been has It M rpittpstuigL 2017 using 23rd, typeset May Preprint ApJ: to Accepted eulc oc´ I10-a rge zc eulc mar- Republic; Czech Prague, 1401-2a, [email protected] Boˇcn´ı II Republic, ⊙ 9M 19 (0 1 1 . Tdn err 01 oaae l 03.The 2003). al. et Nozawa 2001; Ferrara & (Todini M 1 . srnmclIsiue cdm fSine fteCzech the of Sciences of Academy Institute, Astronomical A UTIJCE YSeEPANTENRMRECS NYUGM YOUNG IN EXCESS NIR-MIR THE EXPLAIN SNe BY INJECTED DUST CAN 7 ⊙ − r ffiinl rdcdi h lmyeet fcr-olpesuper core-collapse of ejecta clumpy the ( in produced efficiently are lcrn n h bopino nrei htn.Gan ihsm with Grains photons. ( energetic temperatures of high absorption the and electrons h oe sue oepantena-t i-nrrd(I-I)ex yo temperature (NIR-MIR) within with mid-infrared to medium blackbody near- a thermalized the as the explain modeled to into usually used incorporated is are model The they as grains I xesi nidcto fecetds rdcini N n t su its and SNe in production scen dust this efficient In of indication mass-loading. an and is efficiency excess heating MIR low star thermalized the a the in assuming s found into between 2016) excesses grains interval near-infrared that characteristic the the find explain the all we successfully to event, incorporate comparable SN to cases, individual required some an time For increasin the decreases. become if size grains their small as that account ch ions into at the taking manifestation Nevertheless, by persistent sputtering. increased a thermal have efficient to by grains conditions destroyed small extreme these the for However, difficult starlight. and PAHs foreground . ⊙ Idbtu ta.21;Mtur ta.2014). al. et Matsuura 2014; al. et (Indebetouw 0 ∼ epeetapyial-oiae oe novn h ieetproc different the involving model physically-motivated a present We . 0 )M 9) ntelte nlss rmtetheoreti- the From analysis. latter the in . (0 05 . 4 µ ⊙ )a hyaeicroae notehtaddneIM etdvia heated ISM, dense and hot the into incorporated are they as m) − 1. A fds uigtefirst the during dust of T 0 E INTRODUCTION . tl mltajv 12/16/11 v. emulateapj style X )M 6) egoMart Sergio ⊙ ∼ ntefre td and study former the in 00K eurdt rdc I-I xeswt epc othe to respect with excess NIR-MIR a produce to required K) 1000 ∼ (0 ´ ınez-Gonz . 1 − cetdt ApJ: to Accepted ∼ 3 ∼ . )M 1) (13 5years 25 alez ´ − ⊙ CLUSTERS? ABSTRACT 80) 1 of ihr W Richard , ∼ a 3d 2017 23rd, May a ta.(05;Gaain&Wlim (2016); between 0 lie and would and Williams destroyed) fraction & (completely constraints). such Ghavamian 0 that estimates observational agree studies theoretical These for (2015); (2016); (2015) for al. Lakićević et al. al. Micelotta (2016) et et Lau (2015); al. al. et Nozawa et al. Bocchio et (see, (2007); Marassi ISM Schneider the & into (2007); Bianchi way of their example passage make the for and survive in shock to reverse the able evolving the is on SNRs which insights fraction isolated given mass of has dust media study shock. low-temperature the reverse diffuse supernova respect, the this by In reached are they as rsuewihrslsi h anhn fasrn star over- strong a central temperatures of large with launching a the wind in cluster creating results randomly thus which shells pressure merge, supernova stellar and and young winds in collide enhanced stellar is thermal- as energy The clusters kinetic shock. the leading of the ization from by discontinuity lead- shocked swept-up contact the matter a a the by ISM; separated and the is thermalizes region ejecta, ejecta which the (LS), thermalizes shock ex- reverse ing ejecta which a the formed, (RS), which are shocks in shock two ISM region eventually the a freely; explosion, pands follows: supernova as a structured of is occurrence the From ejecta. the of efficiency mixing the and density pteigi o gas, hot a thermal favoring in against distribution sputtering lifetime grain size (graphite/silicate) a teristic to re- ( the lead grains big of would passage shock, the by verse promoted sputtering, 2011). Thermal al. Wünsch et 2011; 2004, ∼ (400 (1 − − unsch ¨ 00 cm 1000) ne o essetmnfsainare manifestation persistent a for ances 00 .I u prah utgrains dust approach, our In K. 1000) lsesosre nM3(ean tal. (Relaño et M33 in observed clusters proaepoin.Ormdl,can models, Our explosions. upernova & l ie a oeesl cur the acquire easily more can sizes all nieyugmsiecutr make clusters massive young inside oa,famne nosalpieces small into fragmented novae, 1 0 l rnprn oterimpinging their to transparent gly I-I aeegh ste are they as wavelengths NIR-MIR 1.1. a Palou Jan , . 05 − h I-I xesls longer last excess NIR-MIR the esfudi uhcutr and clusters such in found cess 3 ro h rsneo h NIR- the of presence the ario, eimi lolne,adin and longer, also is medium se ffcigsproadust supernova affecting esses µ Nseovn nSSCs in evolving SNRs Ceair&Ceg18;Slc tal. et Silich 1985; Clegg & (Chevalier ) scnb oe rmtecharac- the from noted be can as m), sqetdestruction. bsequent n asv trclusters. star massive ung τ rqetcliin with collisions frequent sput ˇ s 1 : SIESTELLAR ASSIVE . eedn nteISM the on depending 8 & 10 msinof emission 6 n densities and K 2 Mart´ınez-González et al.

ties have been thoroughly studied by (Relaño et al. 2013, 2016) (like NGC 604 and NGC 595, to name the most − a a(µm) T 2.5 prominent examples) and in individual clusters in SBS τ = =7 × 105 +1 , sput |a˙ | n(cm−3) 2 × 106 K 0335-052E (Reines et al. 2008). In fact, Relaño et al. " # (2016) and Reines et al. (2008) required an additional (1) ∼ 1000-K blackbody component of “uncertain origin” to fit their observed IR SEDs. in units of years. In the above equation a is the Similar excesses, more prevalent in the MIR, have also grain radius,a ˙ is the rate of decrease of the grain been observed in a number of blue compact dwarf galax- radius (Draine & Salpeter 1979; Tielens et al. 1994; ies (e.g: I Zw 18, II Zw 40, Mrk 930 and Haro 11 Tsai & Mathews 1995), n is the gas number density, (Rémy-Ruyer et al. 2015; Vanzi et al. 2000; Izotov et al. and T is the gas temperature. With ambient condi- 2014)). Therefore, these observations not only point to tions T = 107 K and n = 10 cm−3, a grain with ra- the existence of a very hot dust component (∼400-1000 dius a =0.005 µm would be completely eroded in ∼ 350 K), but also give compelling evidence for the presence of years, while for a = 1 µm, it would take ∼ 7.1 × 104 a persistent (i.e. long-living and/or constantly replen- years. However, shocks in a magnetized medium may ished) population of small grains associated to young also enhance the occurrence of frequent grain-grain colli- stellar clusters. sions (Jones et al. 1996). This can occur if the majority From these motivations, here we advocate that a popu- of grains reside in dense clumps and they move at high lation of SN-condensed small grains, heated by the in- speeds relative to each other as a result of magnetohydro- tense radiation field emerging from the cluster and fre- dynamic turbulence (see the discussion in Section 2.2). quent electronic collisions in the thermalized ejecta, is This might imply that the population of small grains responsible for the observed NIR-MIR excesses in young can be replenished from the shattering of long-living big massive clusters, in particular in the case of the young grains. If this is the case, the post-shock size distribu- massive clusters in M33. For this purpose, we have con- tion will have an excess of small grains. Evidence in the sidered a number of physical effects which might prolong ∼ 104 year-old galactic supernova remnant Sgr A East the emergence of the NIR-MIR excess, e.g. a quick re- (Lau et al. 2015) seems to point to an enhanced mass ra- plenishment and mitigated destruction of the population tio between small grains and large grains (with charac- of small grains. teristic sizes ∼ 0.001 µm and ∼ 0.04 µm, respectively), The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we in- with values as high as 0.59 and 0.90 in the post-shock troduce of our star cluster and star cluster wind models south clump and north regions. (subsection 2.1), the consideration of grain processing in As it was shown by Mart´ınez-González et al. (2016) clumpy SN ejecta (2.2), the formulation of the supernova (hereafter MTS16), the evolution of the grain size dis- dust injection process and its relevant timescales are pre- tribution promoted by thermal sputtering could greatly sented (subsection 2.3). In Section 3 we give the reasons affect the appearance of the infrared spectral energy to apply our model to the infrared spectral energy distri- distributions (IR SEDs) of young stellar clusters, with butions to the most prominent H ii regions in M33 and the population of small grains playing a major role at review some of their relevant properties (stellar mass, NIR-MIR wavelengths. The importance of small grains spectral indexes, age) obtained from the literature; we (. 0.05 µm) on the emission properties of dusty me- also briefly discuss the treatment of the additional dust dia lies on their low heat capacities (as the heat capac- components, other than the newly-produced grains, re- ity scales as ∼ a3). From the action of either electron- quired to fit the observed IR SEDs in the whole infrared grain collisions (promoted in the hot and dense plasma regime (subsection 3.1). Section 4 deals with the results streaming out as a star cluster wind) or the absorption of our models and the requirements of the model to work. of energetic photons (given their ample supply from a Our results are presented at different evolutionary times. collection of hundreds or thousands of massive stars, In Section we discuss the relative importance of other Takeuchi et al. 2003), small grains are more and more af- dust sources compared to SN dust. The summary of the fected by stochastic temperature fluctuations compared main ingredients of the model are presented in Section to their bigger counterparts, provoking that they acquire 6, while our conclusions appear in Section 7. temperatures from a few Kelvin up to ∼ 103 K, thus leav- ing their imprint at near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared 2. HOT DUST WITHIN THE STAR CLUSTER (MIR) wavelengths. 2.1. However, the conditions which allow collisional heating Star Cluster Wind Model in a hot plasma, also promote thermal sputtering, with We focus on coeval young massive stellar clusters a greater impact on small grains. Arendt et al. (2010) with ages 4-6 Myr, i.e, at the start of their super- modeled the spectra of the Puppis A Supernova Remnant nova era (with the first SN occurring at ∼ 3.5 Myr, and showed that dust emission at short wavelengths (λ ≤ e.g. Krause et al. 2013; Mart´ınez-González et al. 2014; 20µm) is significantly reduced in the post-shock region Wünsch et al. 2017). At ∼ 6 Myr, all stars with (relative to the pre-shock region) given an efficient small masses ≥ 40 M⊙ should have exploded as super- grain destruction. novae (Meynet & Maeder 2003). For simplicity, the NIR-MIR emission (∼ 1 − 5 µm), in excess to that of SN explosions are considered to occur a the very cen- starlight and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), ter of spherically-symmetric young star clusters with has been observed in many nearby H ii regions surround- a Schuster stellar density distribution of the form 2 −β ing individual young stellar clusters, as in a number of the ρ∗ ∝ [1 + (r/Rc) ] , where β is taken to be 1.5, r is more than one hundred H ii regions in M33 which proper- the distance from the cluster center, Rc is the core ra- 5 4

TheNIR-MIRExcessinYoungMassiveClusters 3

7 shocked wind, alleviating the destruction of the population of small grains necessary to explain the NIR-MIR excesses. In favor of a low heating eﬃciency, ﬁrst proposed by Smith et al. (2006) and Larsen et al. (2006), one can 6 mention the work of Silich et al. (2007, 2009), who studied several young clusters in the central zone of M82. They found that the observed sizes and expansion veloc- ities of the associated H ii regions are not consistent with 5 )] (K)] , log[T

-3 the standard bubble model (Weaver et al. 1977) which 2 might be the result of a low heating eﬃciency (. 0.1).

2.2. Grain Processing in Clumpy Ejecta

log[n (cm 0 In star clusters, SN-condensed grains residing in dense clumps might be efficiently accelerated by the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence sustained by massive −2 0 5 10 15 20 stars as shown by Hirashita et al. (2010). For instance, Radius (pc) they found that a grain (silicate or carbonaceous) with radius 0.1 µm in an ionized warm medium with den- Fig. 1.— The radial distribution of temperature and density sity between 1 and 10 cm−3 moves at a speed of a few in the star cluster as calculated from our hydrodynamical model km s−1 with respect to another grain with radius 0.01 (Silich et al. 2011; Palouˇset al. 2013).The upper and lower curves correspond to the calculated temperature and density, respectively, µm (see their Figure 1). Moreover, as the clumps in 40 −1 for a cluster with LSC = 1.7 × 10 erg s , Rc = 3 pc, RSC = 10 the ejecta are traversed by the reverse shock, the grains −1 pc and Vη∞ = 630 km s . This model is later applied to the case would experience a further size-dependent acceleration of the central cluster in NGC 604 (see Section 3). Note the axis as they gyrate along the compressed magnetic field lines break and the change of units in the upper and lower regions of the plot. (Yan et al. 2004; Shull 1977). On this basis, one can anticipate the relevance of grain- grain collisions and the modification of the grain size dis- dius and RSC is the star cluster truncation radius. We tribution in clumpy SN within star clusters. If we assume calculate the gas number density and temperature in- that all the newly-condensed grains reside in clumps with −6 side the star cluster by making use of the model thor- radius 500 AU and a mass of dust per clump Mdcl = 10 oughly discussed in Silich et al. (2011) and Palouˇset al. M⊙ (average values for the dusty globules in the Crab (2013) which solves the set of hydrodynamic equa- Nebula, Grenman et al. 2017). Then, the average dust tions for the stationary flow driven by stellar winds number density inside each clump is and supernova explosions. Our models include the effects of gas (Raymond et al. 1976) and dust radiative 3Mdcl cooling (Dwek 1987; Tenorio-Tagle et al. 2013, 2015b; hndi = 3 , (2) Mart´ınez-González et al. 2016). The star cluster me- 4πhmdiRcl chanical luminosity, LSC, and the stellar mass of the clus- where hm i is the mean mass per grain. For a size 39 5 d ter, MSC , are related as LSC = 3 × 10 (MSC /10 M⊙) distribution of the grains in the unshocked clumps erg s−1 (Leitherer et al. 1999). The mechanical energy characterized by a power-law, ∼ a−α with α = 3.8 is treated as a constant due to the short timescales, on (Temim & Dwek 2013, 2) and lower and upper limits the order of thousands of years, investigated in this work. amin =0.001 µm and amax =0.1 µm, respectively, hmdi Within the cluster, mass is reinserted via stellar winds is ≈ 2.9 × 10−19 g (for a grain density equal to 3.3 g ˙ 2 −3 and SN explosions at a rate M = 2LSC/VA∞, where cm ), thus the average grain size is hai ≈ 0.0027 µm ∞ −3 −3 VA is the adiabatic wind terminal speed. and hndi≈ 3.9 × 10 cm . One can also consider two important parameters: heat- The timescale for an encounter between a grain with ra- ing efficiency (ηhe) and mass loading (ηml). The for- dius a, and an average grain of radius hai in a clump mer represents the fraction of LSC which is converted is into the thermal energy of the wind (see e.g. Silich et al. 2007). The latter arises under the condition of a non- 2 −1 negligible mass of gas left over from star formation which ∆tcoll = π(a + hai) hndiδv , (3) is incorporated into the star cluster wind at a rate ˙ ˙ where δv is the mean relative velocity between grains. Minj = (1+ ηml)M (see e.g. Wünsch et al. 2011). After If δv is higher than 2.7 km s−1 for silicate and 1.2 km the consideration of ηhe and ηml, the value of the wind −1 1/2 s for graphite grains (Jones et al. 1996), as it is in the terminal speed changes to Vη∞ = VA∞[ηhe/(1+ηml)] . case of the MHD turbulence predicted by Hirashita et al. In Figure 1, we show the radial distribution of temper- (2010), then the grain population is effectively influenced ature and density of the wind in a star cluster with 40 −1 by shattering during the lifetime of the clumps. For in- LSC = 1.7 × 10 erg s , Rc and RSC equal to 3 and −1 −1 stance, if δv ≈ 5 km s , a silicate grain with radius 0.1 10 pc respectively, and Vη∞ = 630 km s . This model µm will encounter another grain every 14 days. is later applied to the case of the central cluster in NGC 604 (see Section 3). 2 Temim & Dwek (2013) found that the grain size distribution Given a low heating efficiency, grain thermal sputtering for the Crab Nebula is characterized by a power-law index between is reduced as a consequence of a lower temperature in the -3.5 and -4.0 4 Mart´ınez-González et al.

The lifetime of individual ejecta clumps is largely de- which accounts for a non-negligible ambient pressure fined by the propagation of the reverse shock across (Tang & Wang 2005), ξ is equal to 1.15 (for an ideal gas them, leading to their fragmentation and rapid destruc- with a ratio of specific heats γ = 5/3) and tc is defined tion. The dynamical time for this process has been es- as: timated by Micelotta et al. (2016). For a clump with radius Rcl ∼ 500 AU, a density contrast between the 1/3 clump and the smooth ejecta ∼ 100, and the (attenu- 2 5 E ated) propagation velocity of the shock within the clump SN tc = ξ 5 , (6) −1 5 ρc Vcl ≈ 150 km s , the clump would be destroyed in " s # tdest = 3.5Rcl/Vcl ≈ 55 years. This is a very short time compared to the crossing time of the reverse shock with cs representing the ambient medium sound speed. −3 6 through the whole ejecta (. 3% in all our calculations, For reference, if n =5 cm , T =5.5 × 10 K, Mej =8 see Section 2.3), but also large compared to ∆t . The 51 coll M⊙ and ESN =10 erg, the injection timescale would implication is that by the time when thermal sputtering be τinj ∼ 3820 years when the leading shock would have commences to act in the thermalized ejecta, the grain reached RLS ∼ 4.90 pc. size distribution has already been shifted towards smaller From the consideration of dust being incorporated into grains. One can then assume that grains with radius the thermalized medium and the action of thermal sput- ≥ 0.05 µm have all been shattered, thus producing an tering, the grain size distribution, ∂ni/∂a (where ni is excess of grains with radius ≤ 0.001 µm. From the the grain number density of each dust species), evolves above considerations, in our calculations we have taken with time from the continuity equation (Laor & Draine the grain size distribution immediately after clump de- (1993);Yamada & Kitayama (2005): struction to have the form ∼ a−α (α = 3.8) with lower and upper limits amin = 0.0005 µm and amax = 0.05 µm. ∂ ∂n ∂ ∂n In characterizing the emission from grains residing in un- a˙ i + i = A(m)a−α/τ (m), (7) ∂a ∂a ∂t ∂a i inj shocked clumps, we consider that silicate and graphite grains (assumed to be produced in equal proportions) are only heated by the absorption of the radiation field (m) (m) if t ≤ τSN + τinj , where α is the index of the dust size emerging from the cluster, whereas grains in the ther- distributions immediately after injection into the thermalized medium (see next Section) are also subject to (m) heating induced by collisions with free electrons. malized medium, τinj is the injection timescale for the m-supernova event which occurs at t = τ (m). The nor- 2.3. Dust Injection into the Thermalized Medium SN malization constants, A(m) (cmα−4), are given by: We follow the evolution of the graphite and silicate grain i populations under the action of thermal sputtering in a similar manner (albeit more physically motivated) as (m) MTS16. Once the gas from the ejecta is thermalized, its (m) fiMdSN /VSC Ai = amax , (8) temperature and density is similar to that of the shocked 4 3−α πρgra da star cluster wind, and thus they are considered to be the amin 3 same medium. In the subsequent, we will refer to the SN Z ejecta and the cluster wind simply as the thermalized where ρgr is the grain density, fi is the species mass medium. (m) Dust injection into the thermalized medium starts once fraction, MdSN is the total mass of dust formed/injected individual clumps in the ejecta are destroyed, and fin- in a single supernova and VSC is the star cluster volume. (m) (m) ishes when all the ejecta is thermalized (at t = τinj ). The constants Ai , are zero until t = τSN . This occurs in a timescale (in units of years) given If the reverse shock has already reached all the dust pro- by Tang & Wang (2009) (see also Reynolds & Chevalier duced by the m-supernova (t > τ (m) + τ (m)), i.e. dust 1984) for a supernova remnant evolving in a hot medium: SN inj injection has ceased, the right-hand term in equation (7) is set to zero. General solutions of equation (7) corre- −1/3 5/6 −1/2 4 ρ Mej ESN sponding to j dust injections are given by (MTS16): τinj ≃ 10 51 , ρs 1.4 M⊙ 10 erg (4) j (m) −α+1 where ρ =1.4mH n is the gas density, mH is the H mass, ∂ni Ai a −26 −3 = ρs = 1.67 × 10 g cm , Mej is the ejecta mass and ∂a (m) (−α + 1) m=1 τ a˙ ( ESN is the kinetic energy of the ejecta. At τinj , the X inj −α+1 radius of the leading shock can be expressed as: (m) a − a˙ (t − τSN ) − , (9) h i 2 1/5 (−α + 1) ) ESN τinj −3 2 7 τinj RLS(τinj )= ξ 2F1 , ; ; − , ρ ! 5 5 5 tc (m) (m) for t ≤ τ + τ , and after the m-dust injection (for (5) SN inj (m) (m) where 2F1 is the Gauss hypergeometric function t > τSN + τinj ): TheNIR-MIRExcessinYoungMassiveClusters 5

Fig. 2.— The Evolution of the Grain Size Distribution and the associated IR emission. Panel a: The blue solid line displays the size distribution of the condensed dust population. The red-dashed (green-dotted) line corresponds to the size distribution associated to dust grains already incorporated into the thermalized medium at 3000 (6000) years after the dust injection started. Grain shattering shifts the distribution towards smaller grains (amin = 0.0005 µm and amax = 0.05 µm, indicated by blue arrows) while thermal sputtering lowers it (indicated by a red arrow) and changes its slope. Grains smaller than (bigger than) ∼ 0.005 µm are less (more) aﬀected by ionic collisions and thus the size distribution is not simply described by a power-law. The upper and lower limits of the size distributions are marked with dotted vertical lines. Panel b shows the IR emission associated to the grain size distributions presented in panel a (see the text for the description of the input model parameters).

grain-grain collisions induced by the high grain density −α+1 inside the clump and the relative motion of the grains in (m) (m) j (m) a turbulent ejecta, lead to the very quick fragmentation ∂n A a − a˙ (t − τSN − τinj ) i = i of the large grains into smaller pieces, thus shifting the ∂a (m) h (−α + 1) i m=1 τ a˙ ( size distribution towards smaller grains. Once the clumps X inj −α+1 are disrupted, shattering is no longer efficient and ther- (m) a − a˙ (t − τSN ) mal sputtering dominates the evolution of the grain size − . (10) distribution according to equations (9) and (10). h i (−α + 1) ) However, we have made use of the size-dependent correction to the sputtering yield (the number of atoms re- The interstellar radiation field emerging from the star moved from a grain after a collision with an energetic par- cluster, Jλ, is characterized by multiples, U, of the so- NBH ticle) as prescribed by Serra D´ıaz-Cano & Jones (2008) lar neighborhood radiation field, Jλ (Mathis et al. (approximated by the formula given by Bocchio et al. 1983). The infrared flux per unit wavelength, produced 2012 and averaged by the Maxwell-Boltzmann energy by a population of dust grains with the same chemical distribution) in order to consider more realistic sputter- composition, from a source located at distance DSC, is ing rates. This correction has the ability of increasing given by: the derived sputtering yields for medium-sized and big dust grains, while reducing it for very small grains as 1.4m Z N they become transparent to the more energetic incident f = H d H πΩ × ν ρ SC ions, thus mitigating their destruction. The latter effect d results as the implantation depth of the incident ion (the amax ∞ ∂n a2 i Q (a)B (T )G(a,T ) dT da, characteristic radius at which the ion is stopped), be- ∂a ν ν d d d comes larger than the grain diameter (for sufficiently en- Zamin Z0 (11) ergetic particles, see equation A.2 in Bocchio et al. 2012). Hence, the resultant grain size distribution is no longer in units erg s−1 cm−2 Hz−1 (Dwek & Arendt 1992). In described by a simple power-law. Figure 2 (panel a) presents the evolution of the size distri- the above equation, NH is the hydrogen column density, bution of a population of 0.1 M⊙ of dust injected into the ρd is the size-averaged grain density, ΩSC is the solid intracluster medium. Initially, the size distribution (just angle subtended by the cluster, Td is the dust tempera- after grain condensation) is characterized by a power-law ture, G(a,Td) is the dust temperature distribution result- −α ing from stochastic temperature fluctuations produced ∼ a with α = 3.8, amin = 0.001 µm and amax = 0.1 by both, photon absorptions and electron-grain collisions µm. The grain population in this case is heated by a radiation field 2 × 105 times that of the solar neigh- (see Guhathakurta & Draine 1989; Dwek 1986), Qν (a) borhood value (Mathis et al. 1983). Panel a also shows is the dust absorption efficiency and Bν is the Planck the size distributions corresponding to grains already in- function. Additionally, Zd is the time-dependent dust- jected into the thermalized medium, with number density to-gas mass ratio (MTS16). −3 6 After the dusty clumps are reached by the RS, frequent 2.5 cm and temperature 2.6 × 10 K, at t = 3000 and 6 Mart´ınez-González et al.

6000 years. Panel b in Figure 2 displays the IR emission associated TABLE 1 Cluster Properties to the grain population depicted in panel a. There is a strong NIR-MIR emission from dust heated by starlight Region MSC ψ No. of Stars No. of Stars h∆τSN i 4 in the pre-shocked ejecta which can account for the ob- (10 M⊙) -- (≥ 40M⊙) years served NIR-MIR excess. However, their emission will be NGC 604 56.8 0.12 6.5×105 650 3800 rapidly overcome by that of the dust in the post-shock NGC 595 22.4 0.07 2.6×105 250 8250 region. Given that the small grains are rapidly destroyed NGC 588 6.86 0.00 7.9×104 80 31000 by thermal sputtering, the NIR part of the emission will NGC 592 3.98 0.13 4.6×104 45 50000 be greatly reduced after a few thousand years. Note. — The Table presents the stellar masses of the selected As mentioned before, we restrict our models to the case star clusters obtained by Relaño et al. (2010), spectral indexes as of supernovae occurring at (or very close to) the cen- estimated by Tabatabaei et al. (2007). For the average interval be- ter of the star cluster. In the case when this assump- tween supernova explosions we ran a Starburst99 model with a standard Kroupa Initial Mass Function with metallicity Z=0.4Z⊙, and tion is relaxed, off-centered supernova blast waves would Geneva evolutionary tracks (Meynet et al. 1994) with no rotation. be evolving in the steep density gradient expected at large radii in the cluster, leading to the blowout and rapid loss of energy of the ejecta (Tenorio-Tagle et al. MIR excess with respect to the emission from PAHs. 2015a; Silich & Tenorio-Tagle 2017) and the release of In such cases another problem arises; the typical mass the SN products out of the stellar cluster, possibly in- of a SN ejecta (in our case assumed to be 5 M⊙, see cluding a non-negligible amount of dust grains. Finally, e.g. Yadav et al. 2016) becomes comparable to the gas although thermal sputtering may produce grains with mass enclosed in the star cluster volume. If this is the radii ≤ 0.0005 µm, these grains are removed from all our case, the capture of the SN ejecta is not achieved and a calculations as they are considered completely sputtered. smooth cluster wind is not developed; rather the supernova explosions behave as isolated events (Sharma et al. 3. THE STAR CLUSTERS IN M33 2014) where the dust content is diluted in a larger vol- With the considerations expressed in the prior sections, ume and thermalization is inefficient. To overcome this we have applied our model to the observed IR SEDs of problem, it is necessary not only to consider a low heat- the M33 clusters (located at a distance ∼ 817 ± 58 kpc ing efficiency to reduce the effects of thermal sputtering, Freedman et al. 2001), in particular to the prominent re- but also the effect of mass loading in the stellar wind gions NGC 604, NGC 595, NGC 588, and NGC 592 (re- to warrant that mass enclosed inside RSC is always sig- gions 98, 44, 7, 25 in the Relaño et al. (2016) sample, nificantly larger than the mass ejected by a single su- respectively). Our intention is not to provide best fitting pernova. For this reason, our models for NGC 588 and models to the observed IR SEDs; rather, we aim to show NGC 592 include mass loading, however, in conservative that a population of newly-produced supernovae grains, values (ηml = 1). subject to the extreme prevailing conditions in young The hydrodynamical model for NCG 604, consists of a star cluster with a mechanical luminosity ∼ 1.71 × 1040 massive clusters, is able to explain the NIR-MIR excesses −1 observed in such objects. We selected these four regions, erg s , with dimensions given by Rc = 3 pc and because they all have reliable estimates of their stellar RSC = 10 pc (which give a half-mass radius RHM =5.4 masses (Relaño et al. 2010) and have experienced recent pc), an average interval between successive supernova explosions ∼ 3800 years, an adiabatic wind terminal speed supernova activity as can be inferred from their relatively −1 VA∞ = 2000 km s (which with ηhe = 0.1 is reduced flat spectral indexes (Tabatabaei et al. 2007; Yang et al. −1 1996; Gordon et al. 1993, see Table 1), which is inter- to Vη∞ = 632.5 km s ), lower and upper limits for preted as non-thermal (synchrotron) emission from su- the injected dust size distribution, amin = 0.0005µm pernova remnants. and amax = 0.05µm, respectively. The average conditions, gas density and temperature, for the thermal- In Table 1 we present the stellar masses for the four re- −3 gions, their spectral indexes (denoted as ψ), the total ized medium in this case are hni ∼ 7.4 cm and 6 number of stars in the respective cluster, the number hT i =5.2×10 K. For typical supernova values (Mej =8 51 −1 of massive stars with masses ≥ 40 M⊙, the average in- M⊙, ESN = 10 erg s ) and the prevailing conditions terval between successive supernova explosions (h∆τSN i, inside the cluster, evaluation of equation (4) results in the inverse of the average supernova rate), as pre- an injection timescale τinj = 2800 years, when the SN dicted by the Geneva evolutionary tracks (Meynet et al. leading shock radius is about 4 pc and is well-contained 1994) implemented in the Starburst99 synthesis model inside RSC. The main input parameters used in our four (Leitherer et al. 1999) for a 4-Myr star cluster and a models are summarized in Table 2 and the derived quan- Kroupa initial mass function (indexes −1.3 and −2.3) tities from the hydrodynamical model are presented in with lower and upper cut-off mass of 0.1 M⊙ and 100 Table 3. M⊙, respectively, a turn-off mass at 0.5 M⊙ and metal- For NGC 604 and NGC 595, which stellar content is 5 licity Z=0.4Z⊙. above 10 M⊙ and the estimated age is ∼ 4 Myr From the consideration of star clusters with masses . 105 (Relaño et al. 2013), the radiation field emerging from 6 5 M⊙, the obtained dust injection timescales represent only them is assumed to be 10 and 5 × 10 times that of the a minor fraction of the interval between supernova explo- solar neighborhood, while for regions with stellar masses 5 sions, making the replenishment of grains difficult. This lying below 10 M⊙, the radiation field is assumed to is why we expect that some important fraction of these be 2 × 105 and 105 times the solar neighborhood radia- clusters (with masses similar to NGC 588 and NGC 592 tion field, respectively. In all our models, dust emission or lower) should present a marginal or non-existent NIR- in the thermalized medium is dominated by collisional TheNIR-MIRExcessinYoungMassiveClusters 7

in the case of the warm and cold components, we have TABLE 2 followed the approach taken by Mattsson et al. (2015). Input Parameters In their approach, one assumes a dust temperature distribution instead of a dust size distribution (for the hot Region LSC ηhe ηml U (1039erg s−1) --- dust component we did the opposite). With the method, one does not have to assume a certain radiation field NGC 604 17.1 0.1 0 1 × 106 NGC 595 6.72 0.1 0 5 × 105 to derive a dust mass. Our chosen dust temperature NGC 588 2.05 0.1 1 2 × 105 distribution is represented by a power-law of the form − − NGC 592 1.19 0.1 1 1 × 105 3 χ/2 G(a,Td) ∝ Td , where χ is the effective emissivity Note. — The Table presents the input pa- index which we take as 1. rameters we used for the selected clusters. The For the cold and warm dust components, we have set the values of LSC were obtained from the rela- 39 5 −1 limits of the size distribution to 0.0001 µm and 0.5 µm tion LSC = 3 × 10 (MSC /10 M⊙) erg s (Leitherer et al. 1999). U characterizes the for all the models. The temperature range for our NGC strength of the radiation field in multiples of the 604 and NGC 595 cold dust models was set to (16−33) K, NBH solar neighborhood value, Jλ (Mathis et al. while for the NGC 588 and NGC 592 models it was set to 1983). (12 − 33) K. In the case of the warm dust component the range of temperatures is (50 − 100) K for all the models. Finally, for the PAHs component, the range of sizes was TABLE 3 taken from 0.0001 µm to 0.0009 µm while the range of Model Outputs temperatures was set to (90 − 750) K in all the models. 4. (m) RESULTS Region Vη∞ hni hT i τinj /h∆τSN i (km s−1) (cm−3) (106 K) - In Figure 3, we show the evolution of the total mass of dust within the central star cluster (≤ RSC ) as a result of NGC 604 630 7.4 5.2 0.50 NGC 595 630 2.9 5.3 0.50 successive supernova explosions. The mass of dust pro- NGC 588 450 2.5 2.6 0.15 duced in the ejecta of individual supernovae is taken to NGC 592 450 1.5 2.6 0.10 be ∼ 0.8 (the amount of dust already produced in SN

Note. — The values of Vη∞ were obtained from an 1987A), 0.5, 0.1 and 0.5 M⊙ for our NGC 604, NGC 595, −1 VA∞ = 2000 km s and the corresponding assumed NGC 588 and NGC 592 models, respectively. For the values of ηhe and ηml presented in Table 2. The average NGC 588 and NGC 592 models, one can note that due gas densities and temperatures were obtained from the to the extreme conditions in the thermalized ISM leading hydrodynamical star cluster wind model. Finally, we present the ratio of the dust injection timescale to the to a rapid sputtering of the grains and a long interval be- average interval between successive supernova explosions tween SNe, the mass of dust remaining in the cluster as a in the star cluster. result of a single injection event becomes negligible after a few thousand years. If the dust injection timescale is heating at NIR wavelengths, while photon heating at comparable to the interval between supernova explosions, MIR wavelengths. We also note that in a coeval clus- −5 then there is a non-negligible amount of dust present in ter, the number of UV photons starts to drop (as ∼ t , the cluster during a large fraction of the supernova era Beltrametti et al. 1982) as a consequence of the explosion (which lasts the order of ∼ 4 × 107 years). of the massive stars (Mart´ınez-González et al. 2014). Figure 4 shows the calculated IR SEDs for our NGC 604 For simplicity, all of the modeled clusters are assumed to model at three different evolutionary times (300, 2800 be contained in the same volume. The average density and 3800 years) for a total of 0.8 M⊙ of dust condensed and temperature inside the cluster in each case are shown in the supernova ejecta. For ease of comparison, we show in Table 3. the four separate components required to fit the observa- 3.1. tions, in a similar fashion as Relaño et al. (2016). These The Cold, Warm Dust and PAH s Components evolutionary times were selected because at ∼ 300 years, Following Relaño et al. (2016), we have used three addi- the emission at 3.6 µm from the unshocked and shocked tional components to account for the observed infrared ejecta are approximately equal and thus the total emis- spectral energy distributions. These components arise sion is at a local maximum, and at ∼ 2800 years when the from the H ii regions surrounding the central star clus- incorporation of all the dust into the thermalized medium ters. One component is that from cold dust radiating has been completed. Before ∼ 300 years, the emission at low temperatures (a few times ∼ 10 K). From this arising from dust in the unshocked ejecta is dominant component a huge amount of dust can be inferred (thou- over the emission corresponding to dust in the thermal- sands or tens of thousands of solar masses), most prob- ized medium. After ∼ 2800 years, the emission drops ably the result of efficient grain growth (see for example fast (as a consequence of rapid grain destruction) until Asano et al. 2013). A second component corresponds to ∼ 3800 years, when the second injection event starts, as warm dust (∼ (50 − 100) K) which Relaño et al. (2016) shown in panel d in Figure 4. attributes to the emission of very small grains. The We ought not to omit that the contribution from starlight third component is that from Polycyclic Aromatic Hy- in the infrared SEDs is orders of magnitude below the ob- drocarbons (PAHs). The heating of this grains is always served data points and therefore it is not responsible for dominated by the absorption of the radiation field, while the infrared excesses we are devoted to explain. At 300 collisional heating is always negligible due the low tem- and 2800 years after the start of the first injection event, perature of the diffuse medium in which the grains are the presence of the NIR-MIR excess with respect to the immersed. For simplicity, in fitting the observed data PAHs emission is evident. Only at ∼ 3800 years, the ex- 8 Mart´ınez-González et al.

1 592 is roughly the same as some other prominent clusters in M33 like IC 131 and IC 131-West (Rela˜no et al. 2010). For this reason, we will use them as probes for the evolutionary trend resultant from the injection and 0.1 destruction of grains. For our NGC 592, the star cluster contains 106 M⊙ of gas. )

⊙ In Figure 8, the observed IR SEDs for NGC 592 (squares

(M 0.01 filled with cyan), IC 131 (pink stars) and ICI 131-West d (green diamonds) are shown. Other interesting regions M identified by Relaño et al. (2013) are regions 20 and 85. Region 20 (in the following referred as SSC20) shows 0.001 strong emission in excess to that of PAHs (yellow circles in Figure 8), whereas the excess is absent for region 85 (referred as SSC85). In the plot, we have overlaid our 0.0001 predicted IR SEDs for the NGC 592 model evaluated at 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 1000, 4800, 6000 and 10000 years. Time (years) In the frame of our models, the differences between these five clusters at short wavelengths (≤ 10 µm) Fig. 3.— The evolution of the dust mass in the star cluster. The might be explained by considering supernova dust injec- curves display the total mass of dust present in the star cluster as a function of time for our NGC 604 (black dashed line), NGC 595 tions at different evolutionary stages, off-centered super- (blue dotted line), NGC 588 (green dash-dotted line) and NGC novae (evolving in the blowout regime as explained by 592 (red dash-double dotted line) models. In the models, the mass Tenorio-Tagle et al. (2015a) and Silich & Tenorio-Tagle of dust injected inside the star cluster is 0.8, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.5 M⊙, (2017)) and/or simply supernovae with different dust respectively. Note that almost all the dust mass is returned to the gas phase in a timescale of a few thousand years as a result of yields. efficient thermal sputtering. 5. DUST FROM OTHER SOURCES As pointed out earlier in this paper, before the first cess is marginal. In general the presence of the NIR-MIR supernova occurs (at ∼ 3.5 Myr), the intracluster excess should be detectable for ∼ 85% of the time spent medium is already thermalized by the interaction of by the cluster in the supernova era with the assumed the stellar winds of individual stars, leading to the supernova rate and heating efficiency (10%). This per- launching of a fast outflow, the star cluster wind (e.g. centage is calculated from the time during which the dust Chevalier & Clegg 1985; Cantóet al. 2000; Silich et al. emission has a clear excess with respect to the emission 2004). Therefore, at the time of the first SNe, any resid- of PAHs, not with the agreement with the observed data ual dust left over from star formation should have been, of a particular cluster in a particular evolutionary stage. either destroyed in the hot wind or expelled out of the In this case, the mass of gas enclosed in the star cluster cluster. In the latter case, far from the bulk of the stars and in a less hot and less dense medium, the expelled dust (≤ RSC ) is 535 M⊙, ∼ 107 times more than the typical SN ejecta mass we have assumed. must be contributing to the emission which is accounted Our calculated IR SEDs for the NGC 595 for the se- as the warm dust component (green dotted curves in Fig- lected evolutionary times are presented in Figure 5. In ures 4 to 7). this case, a total dust mass of 0.5 M⊙ was used. One Dust condensed out of the material injected by Wolf- can observe that the agreement with the observed data Rayet stars (WR) must also contribute to the IR emission points is excellent at 1000 and 3800 years, while for 8000 in the clusters; however, their contribution to the total years the excess with respect to the emission of PAHs is dust budget is unclear and most likely minor compared to absent. However, the NIR-MIR infrared excess associ- dust injection by SNe (e.g. Matsuura et al. 2013, for the ated to these grains would be detectable during ∼ 60% case of the Small Magellanic Cloud). Moreover, clusters of the evolution of the cluster in this model (see panel d with a presumably large WR population producing some in Figure 5). In this model the mass of gas in the star amount of dust, show no NIR-MIR excess (e.g. SSC85), cluster is 210 M⊙. making WR stars unlikely to play a significant role in For our NGC 588 model (evaluated and displayed in Fig- producing the excess. ure 6) we used 0.1 M⊙ of injected dust, the infrared emis- 6. SUMMARY sion behaves similarly to the previous cases at 1000 and Here we have considered the infrared emission of the dust 4000 years. At 10000 years the grain emission is over- grains formed in core-collapse SN within young mas- come by the PAHs emission and the NIR-MIR excess of sive stellar clusters. It is noted that the emission at our interest is absent. Only during ∼ 20% of the super- NIR-MIR wavelengths is more likely to be produced by nova era the NIR-MIR excess would be present as shown stochastically-heated small grains and that several effects in the comparison for the modeled and observed flux at can prevent their fast destruction. As a result, the pe- 3.6 µm in Figure 6. In this case, the enclosed mass of riod during which their emission dominates over the fore- gas in the star cluster is 180 M⊙. ground PAHs features is enhanced. These effects can be In the case of NGC 592 (see Figure 7), the results in gen- summarized as follows: eral are very similar to the case of NGC 588 for the three shown evolutionary times even though this cluster is less 1. Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in star clusters massive and the assumed amount of dust injected within (Hirashita et al. 2010), together with the compres- the star cluster is 0.5 M⊙. The stellar mass of NGC sion of the magnetic field lines (Shull 1977), acting TheNIR-MIRExcessinYoungMassiveClusters 9

105 105 Obs. NGC 604 a) b) Unshocked Ejecta Dust Emission Shocked Dust Emission 104 Warm Dust Emission 104 Cold Dust Emission PAH Emission Total Emission 103 103

102 102 Flux (mJy) Flux (mJy)

101 101

100 100 1 10 100 1 10 100 Wavelength ( m) Wavelength ( m) 105 150 c) d)

104

100 103 (mJy)

10 3.6 m Flux (mJy) F 50

101

100 0 1 10 100 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Wavelength ( m) time (years) Fig. 4.— The infrared spectral energy distribution for our NGC 604 dust emission model at 300 (panel a), 2800 (panel b) and 3800 (panel c) years after the first injection event started with an interval between events ∼ 3800 years. The blue-solid and purple-dashed lines depict the emission from dust residing in the unshocked and shocked ejecta, respectively, for our NGC 604 model. The dash-double dotted blue, dotted-green and dash-dotted red lines correspond to the emission of pre-existing PAHs, warm and cold grains in the illuminated H ii region associated to the central cluster, respectively. Total emission is displayed as a black solid line. Observed values (squares in cyan) were obtained from the tables provided in Relaño et al. (2016). Panel d (bottom right) presents the evolution of the flux modeled at 3.6 µm as compared to the observed value (shaded region in cyan, which includes the associated observational error) and the emission from PAHs (dash-dotted light blue line). The red crosses in panel d indicate the times displayed in the other panels. in clumpy SN ejecta may enhance the occurrence of the consideration of mass-loaded winds is also cru- grain-grain collisions, producing an excess of small cial in these cases. grains (Jones et al. 1996), we thus consider that 7. CONCLUDING REMARKS the grain population is formed only by grains with radii . 0.05 µm. We have applied our SN dust injection model to the four most prominent star clusters in the M33 galaxy, spanning 2. Small grains can actually be traversed by collid- a wide range of masses and dust (from different sources) ing ions if these are energetic enough not to be contents, from the Relaño et al. (2013, 2016) sample of stopped inside the small dust particles, as shown H ii regions and their associated observed infrared SEDs. by Serra D´ıaz-Cano & Jones (2008). This effect re- We found that massive clusters, like NGC 604 and NGC duces the derived sputtering rates for very small 595, should exhibit NIR-MIR excesses during a signifi- grains thus increasing their lifetimes. cant fraction of their evolution, especially if the heating efficiency of the thermalized matter is low as suggested 3. The NIR-MIR infrared excesses are more persistent by several independent studies (e.g. Smith et al. 2006; if the time required to shock-process individual SN Silich et al. 2009). With regard to star clusters with ejecta (Tang & Wang 2009) is comparable to the 4 masses of a few times ∼ 10 M⊙, we propose that the interval between SN explosions. evolutionary trends of the NIR-MIR emission obtained 4. A low efficiency in the thermalization of the kinetic from our models is well represented by NGC 592, NGC energy of stellar winds and supernova explosions 592, IC 131 and IC 131-West, which have similar masses (Silich et al. 2007, 2009) would also alleviate the and their emission at wavelengths ≥ 10 µm is almost destruction of grains of all sizes. identical. When analyzing other young massive clusters with no available stellar mass estimates, e.g. the 4 5. Star clusters with modest masses (∼ 10 M⊙), star clusters with identification numbers 20 and 85 in if not mass-loaded, may struggle with the cap- the Relaño et al. (2016) sample, one can observe that ture and interaction of SN ejecta, thus inhibiting while the emission at wavelengths ≥ 10 µm is very simi- the driving of a smooth wind in the sense of the lar to that found in NGC 588, NGC 592, IC 131 and IC Chevalier & Clegg (1985) classical model; hence, 131-West, they differ at short wavelengths by an order 10 Mart´ınez-González et al.

105 105 Obs. NGC 595 a) b) Unshocked Ejecta Dust Emission 104 Shocked Dust Emission 104 Warm Dust Emission Cold Dust Emission PAH Emission 103 Total Emission 103

102 102

Flux (mJy) 101 Flux (mJy) 101

100 100

10 1 10 1 1 10 100 1 10 100 Wavelength ( m) Wavelength ( m) 105 60 c) d)

104

103 40

102 (mJy) 3.6 m Flux (mJy) 101 F 20

100

10 1 0 1 10 100 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Wavelength ( m) time (years) 5 Fig. 5.— Same as Figure 4 but for the model representing NGC 595. In this case, the mass of the stellar cluster is 2.24 × 10 M⊙. Relevant evolutionary times in this case are 1000, 3800 and 8200 years. of magnitude. We interpret this as evidence that region by ionic collisions. 20 experienced grain injection from a supernova in the Further analysis of the implications of the blowout sce- last few thousand years, whereas region 85 should not nario (Tenorio-Tagle et al. 2015a; Silich & Tenorio-Tagle have had a recent grain injection occurring at its central 2017) on the survival, manifestation and dispersal of region. supernova-produced dust grains is left for a future com- Our model thus predicts that a NIR-MIR excess might be munication. transiently observed in the spectra of young massive star clusters. The characteristic timescale for such an excess to be observed and thus the probability to observe it in The authors thank G. Tenorio-Tagle, S. Silich and the a sample of the selected clusters depends on the ability anonymous Referee for their careful reading and helpful to capture the ejecta of individual supernovae inside the suggestions which greatly improved the paper, and M. clusters. In broad terms, the presence of the NIR-MIR Relaño for answering our questions about her data. Sup- excess is an indication of efficient dust production by port for this project was provided by the Czech Science SNe exploding within star clusters. It also suggests the Foundation grant 209/15/06012S and by project RVO: presence of a large population of very small grains heated 6785815. SMG also thanks initial support for the project to high temperatures as well as strong grain destruction provided by INAOE and CONACYT, México through research grant 167169. SMG dedicates this work to the memory of his beloved baby Andˇel.

REFERENCES Arendt, R. G., Dwek, E., Blair, W. P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 585 Cant´o, J., Raga, A. C., & Rodr´ıguez, L. F. 2000, ApJ, 536, 896 Asano, R. S., Takeuchi, T. T., Hirashita, H., & Nozawa, T. 2013, Cernuschi, F., Marsicano, F., & Codina, S. 1967, Annales MNRAS, 432, 637 d’Astrophysique, 30, 1039 Beltrametti, M., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Yorke, H. W. 1982, A&A, Chevalier, R. A., & Clegg, A. W. 1985, Nature, 317, 44 112, 1 De Looze, I., Barlow, M. J., Swinyard, B. M., et al. 2017, Bevan, A., Barlow, M. J., & Milisavljevic, D. 2016, ArXiv MNRAS, 465, 3309 e-prints, arXiv:1611.05006 Draine, B. T., & Salpeter, E. E. 1979, ApJ, 231, 77 Bianchi, S., & Schneider, R. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 973 Dwek, E. 1986, ApJ, 302, 363 Biscaro, C., & Cherchneﬀ, I. 2016, A&A, 589, A132 Dwek, E. 1987, ApJ, 322, 812 Bocchio, M., Marassi, S., Schneider, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, Dwek, E., & Arendt, R. G. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 11 A157 Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., et al. 2001, ApJ, Bocchio, M., Micelotta, E. R., Gautier, A.-L., & Jones, A. P. 553, 47 2012, A&A, 545, A124 TheNIR-MIRExcessinYoungMassiveClusters 11

105 105 Obs. NGC 588 a) b) Unshocked Ejecta Dust Emission 104 Shocked Dust Emission 104 Warm Dust Emission Cold Dust Emission PAH Emission 103 Total Emission 103

102 102

Flux (mJy) 101 Flux (mJy) 101

100 100 ¤ 10 1 10¡1

1 10 100 1 10 100 ¥ Wavelength ( m) Wavelength (¢ m) 105 5 c) d)

104 4

103 3

102 (mJy)

m ¦ 2 3.6 Flux (mJy) 101 F

1 100

10 1 0 1 10 100 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Wavelength (£ m) time (years)

4 Fig. 6.— Same as Figure 4 but for the model representing NGC 588. In this case, the mass of the stellar cluster is 6.86 × 10 M⊙. Panels a, b and c show the calculated fluxes 3.6 µm at 1000, 4000 and 10000 years. Ghavamian, P., & Williams, B. J. 2016, ArXiv e-prints, Mattsson, L., Gomez, H. L., Andersen, A. C., & Matsuura, M. arXiv:1608.03373 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4079 Gordon, S. M., Kirshner, R. P., Duric, N., & Long, K. S. 1993, Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2003, A&A, 404, 975 ApJ, 418, 743 Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., & Grenman, T., Gahm, G. F., & Elfgren, E. 2017, A&A, 599, A110 Charbonnel, C. 1994, A&AS, 103 Guhathakurta, P., & Draine, B. T. 1989, ApJ, 345, 230 Micelotta, E. R., Dwek, E., & Slavin, J. D. 2016, A&A, 590, A65 Hirashita, H., Nozawa, T., Yan, H., & Kozasa, T. 2010, MNRAS, Moseley, S. H., Dwek, E., Glaccum, W., Graham, J. R., & 404, 1437 Loewenstein, R. F. 1989, Nature, 340, 697 Indebetouw, R., Matsuura, M., Dwek, E., et al. 2014, ApJ Let, Nozawa, T., Kozasa, T., Habe, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 955 782, L2 Nozawa, T., Kozasa, T., Umeda, H., Maeda, K., & Nomoto, K. Izotov, Y. I., Guseva, N. G., Fricke, K. J., Krügel, E., & Henkel, 2003, ApJ, 598, 785 C. 2014, A&A, 570, A97 Palouˇs, J., Wünsch, R., Mart´ınez-González, S., et al. 2013, ApJ, Jones, A. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1996, 772, 128 ApJ, 469, 740 Raymond, J. C., Cox, D. P., & Smith, B. W. 1976, ApJ, 204, 290 Krause, M., Charbonnel, C., Decressin, T., Meynet, G., & Reines, A. E., Johnson, K. E., & Hunt, L. K. 2008, AJ, 136, 1415 Prantzos, N. 2013, A&A, 552, A121 Relaño, M., Monreal-Ibero, A., V´ılchez, J. M., & Kennicutt, R. C. Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1635 Lakićević, M., van Loon, J. T., Meixner, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, Relaño, M., Verley, S., Pérez, I., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A140 799, 50 Relaño, M., Kennicutt, R., Lisenfeld, U., et al. 2016, ArXiv Laor, A., & Draine, B. T. 1993, ApJ, 402, 441 e-prints, arXiv:1606.03624 Larsen, S. S., Origlia, L., Brodie, J. P., & Gallagher, J. S. 2006, Rémy-Ruyer, A., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2015, A&A, MNRAS, 368, L10 582, A121 Lau, R. M., Herter, T. L., Morris, M. R., Li, Z., & Adams, J. D. Reynolds, S. P., & Chevalier, R. A. 1984, ApJ, 278, 630 2015, Science, 348, 413 Sarangi, A., & Cherchneff, I. 2015, A&A, 575, A95 Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, Serra D´ıaz-Cano, L., & Jones, A. P. 2008, A&A, 492, 127 123, 3 Sharma, P., Roy, A., Nath, B. B., & Shchekinov, Y. 2014, Marassi, S., Schneider, R., Limongi, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, MNRAS, 443, 3463 454, 4250 Shull, J. M. 1977, ApJ, 215, 805 Mart´ınez-González, S., Silich, S., & Tenorio-Tagle, G. 2014, ApJ, Silich, S., Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & 785, 164 Mart´ınez-González, S. 2011, ApJ, 743, 120 Mart´ınez-González, S., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Silich, S. 2016, ApJ, Silich, S., & Tenorio-Tagle, G. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1375 816, 39 Silich, S., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Muñoz-Tuñón, C. 2007, ApJ, 669, Mathis, J. S., Mezger, P. G., & Panagia, N. 1983, A&A, 128, 212 952 Matsuura, M., Woods, P. M., & Owen, P. J. 2013, MNRAS, 429, Silich, S., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Rodr´ıguez-González, A. 2004, 2527 ApJ, 610, 226 Matsuura, M., Dwek, E., Barlow, M. J., et al. 2014, ArXiv Silich, S., Tenorio-Tagle, G., Torres-Campos, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, e-prints, arXiv:1411.7381 700, 931 12 Mart´ınez-González et al.

105 105 Obs. NGC 592 a) b) Unshocked Ejecta Dust Emission 4 Shocked Dust Emission 4 10 Warm Dust Emission 10 Cold Dust Emission PAH Emission 103 Total Emission 103

102 102

Flux (mJy) 101 Flux (mJy) 101

100 100

10−1 10−1 1 10 100 1 10 100 Wavelength (μm) Wavelength (μm) 105 20 c) d)

104 15 103

102 (mJy) 10 m μ 3.6 Flux (mJy) 101 F 5 100

10−1 0 1 10 100 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Wavelength (μm) time (years)

4 Fig. 7.— Same as Figure 4 but for the model representing NGC 592. In this case, the mass of the stellar cluster is 3.98 × 10 M⊙. Panels a, b and c show the calculated flux at 1000, 4800 and 10000 years. Smith, L. J., Westmoquette, M. S., Gallagher, J. S., et al. 2006, Todini, P., & Ferrara, A. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 726 MNRAS, 370, 513 Tsai, J. C., & Mathews, W. G. 1995, ApJ, 448, 84 Suntzeff, N. B., & Bouchet, P. 1990, AJ, 99, 650 Vanzi, L., Hunt, L. K., Thuan, T. X., & Izotov, Y. I. 2000, A&A, Tabatabaei, F. S., Beck, R., Krügel, E., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, 133 363, 493 Takeuchi, T. T., Hirashita, H., Ishii, T. T., Hunt, L. K., & Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. Ferrara, A. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 839 1977, ApJ, 218, 377 Tang, S., & Wang, Q. D. 2005, ApJ, 628, 205 Wünsch, R., Palouˇs, J., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Ehlerová, S. 2017, Tang, S., & Wang, Q. D. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 2106 ApJ, 835, 60 Temim, T., & Dwek, E. 2013, ApJ, 774, 8 Wünsch, R., Silich, S., Palouˇs, J., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Tenorio-Tagle, G., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., Silich, S., & Cassisi, S. Muñoz-Tuñón, C. 2011, ApJ, 740, 75 2015a, ApJ Let, 814, L8 Yadav, N., Mukherjee, D., Sharma, P., & Nath, B. B. 2016, Tenorio-Tagle, G., Silich, S., Mart´ınez-González, S., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1603.00815 ApJ, 778, 159 Yamada, K., & Kitayama, T. 2005, PASJ, 57, 611 Tenorio-Tagle, G., Silich, S., Mart´ınez-González, S., Terlevich, R., Yan, H., Lazarian, A., & Draine, B. T. 2004, ApJ, 616, 895 & Terlevich, E. 2015b, ApJ, 800, 131 Yang, H., Chu, Y.-H., Skillman, E. D., & Terlevich, R. 1996, AJ, Tielens, A. G. G. M., McKee, C. F., Seab, C. G., & Hollenbach, 112, 146 D. J. 1994, ApJ, 431, 321 TheNIR-MIRExcessinYoungMassiveClusters 13 104 Obs. NGC 592 Obs. IC 131 103 Obs. IC 131-West Obs. 'SSC20' Obs. 'SSC85' 102

101 Flux (mJy) Time (years) 1000 0 10 4800 6000 10000 10−1 1 10 100 Wavelength (μm) Fig. 8.— Infrared SEDs for regions NGC 592, IC 131, IC 131-West, SSC20 and SSC85. We have overlaid the predictions for our NGC 592 model at 1000 (solid blue line), 4800 (blue dashed line), 6000 (red dotted line), and 10000 (green dash-dotted line) years, respectively.