Binocular Challenges
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fully Automated and Do Not Require Human Intervention
ВІСНИК КИЇВСЬКОГО НАЦІОНАЛЬНОГО УНІВЕРСИТЕТУ ІМЕНІ ТАРАСА ШЕВЧЕНКА ISSN 1723-273х АСТРОНОМІЯ 1(51)/2014 Засновано 1958 року Викладено результати оригінальних досліджень із питань релятивістської астрофізики. фізики Сон- ця, астрометрії, небесної механіки. Для наукових працівників, аспірантів, студентів старших курсів, які спеціалізуються в галузі астрономії. Изложены результаты оригинальных исследований по вопросам релятивистской астрофізики, фи- зики Солнца, астрометрии, небесной механики. Для научных работников, аспирантов, студентов старших курсов, специализирующихся в области астрономии. The Herald includes results of original investigations on relativistic astrophysics, solar physics, astrom- etry, celestial mechanics. It is intended for scientists, post-graduate students and student-astronomers. ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНИЙ РЕДАКТОР В.М. Івченко, д-р фіз.-мат. наук, проф. РЕДАКЦІЙНА В.М. Єфіменко, канд. фіз.-мат. наук (заст. відп. ред.); О.В. Федорова, КОЛЕГІЯ канд. фіз.-мат. наук (відп. секр.); Б.І. Гнатик, д-р фіз.-мат. наук; В.І. Жданов, д-р фіз.-мат. наук; В.В. Клещонок, канд. фіз.-мат. наук; Р.І. Костик, д-р фіз.-мат. наук; В.Г. Лозицький, д-р фіз.-мат. наук; Г.П. Міліневський, д-р фіз.-мат. наук; С.Л. Парновський, д-р фіз.-мат. наук; І.Д. Караченцев, д-р фіз.-мат.наук; О.А. Соловйов, д-р фіз.-мат. наук; К.І. Чурюмов, д-р фіз.-мат. наук. Адреса редколегії 04053, Київ-53, вул. Обсерваторна, 3, Астрономічна обсерваторія (38044) 486 26 91, 481 44 78, [email protected] Затверджено Вченою радою Астрономічної обсерваторії 05.06.2014 (протокол № 9) Атестовано Вищою атестаційною комісією України. Постанова Президії ВАК України № 1-05/5 від 01.07.2010 Зареєстровано Міністерством інформації України. Свідоцтво про державну реєстрацію КВ № 20329-101129 Р від 25.07.2013 Засновник Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка, та видавець Видавничо-поліграфічний центр "Київський університет" Свідоцтво внесено до Державного реєстру ДК № 1103 від 31.10.02 Адреса видавця 01601, Київ-601, б-р Т.Шевченка, 14, кімн. -
Binocular Universe: Northern Exposure
Binocular Universe: Northern Exposure March 2013 Phil Harrington he northern circumpolar sky holds many binocular targets that we can enjoy throughout the year. This month, let's take aim at the constellation Ursa TMinor, the Little Bear. You may know it better as the Little Dipper, an asterism made up of the seven brightest stars in the Little Bear. Above: Winter star map from Star Watch by Phil Harrington. Above: Finder chart for this month's Binocular Universe. Chart adapted from Touring the Universe through Binoculars Atlas (TUBA), www.philharrington.net/tuba.htm Call it what you will, this star group is most famous as the home of the North Star, Polaris [Alpha (α) Ursae Minoris]. Earth's rotational axis is aimed just three- quarters of a degree away from Polaris, causing it to trace out a very tiny circle around that invisible point every 24 hours. The North Celestial Pole is slowly moving closer to Polaris. It will continue to close to within 14 minutes of arc around the year 2105, when it will slowly start to pull away. While Polaris is currently the pole star, the 26,000-year wobble of Earth's axis, called precession, causes the Celestial Pole's aim to trace a 47° circle in the sky. For instance, during the building of the pyramids nearly 4,600 years ago, the North Pole was aimed toward the star Thuban in Draco. Fast forward 5,200 years from now and the pole will be point near Alderamin in Cepheus. Most of us at one time or another have heard someone misspeak by referring to Polaris as the brightest star in the night sky. -
Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born. -
Naming the Extrasolar Planets
Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named. -