DOCSLIB.ORG

Situation Overview: Greater Equatoria, South Sudan January - March 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Situation Overview: Greater Equatoria, South Sudan January - March 2018 Situation Overview: Greater Equatoria, South Sudan January - March 2018 Map 2: REACH assessment coverage of the Greater Equatoria region, January (A), February (B) of the situation in a hard-to-reach settlement. REACH Area of Knowledge (AoK) settlement coverage - February 2018 Introduction REACH Area of Knowledge (AoK) settlement coverage - January 2018 1 and March 2018 (C) 1 Legend Legend 0 - 4.9% From January to March 2018, REACH 0 - 4.9% 5 - 10% Following the outbreak of violence in Juba in (A) 5 - 10% (B) July 2016, the conflict in South Sudan expanded interviewed 900 KIs that had knowledge about to previously peaceful areas, including the 400 different settlements: 214 settlements in all six counties of Central Equatoria State, Greater Equatoria region (Central, Eastern, 71 settlements in five out of eight counties of REACH Area of Knowledge (AoK) settlement coverage - March 2018 and Western Equatoria states). Many areas 1 Legend Eastern Equatoria State and 115 settlements 0 - 4.9% in the Greater Equatoria region are largely 5 - 10% in six out of ten counties of Western Equatoria (C) Map based on Longitude (generated) and Latitude (generated) and Latitude (generated). For pane Latitude (generated): Color shows details about A.Indicator color (coverage). Details are shown for County and Month Month. For pane Latitude inaccessible to humanitarian actors due to (generated) (2): Size shows Settlement Size (Parameters). Details are shown for Namecounty. The data is filtered on Month Month and State Label. The Month Month filter keeps February 2018. The State Label filter keeps Central Equatoria, Eastern Map based on Longitude (generated) and Latitude (generated) and Latitude (generated). For pane Latitude (generated): Color shows details about A.Indicator color (coverage). Details are shown for County and Month Month. For pane Latitude Equatoria and Western Equatoria. The view is filtered on Latitude (generated), which keeps non-Null values only. (generated) (2): Size shows Settlement Size (Parameters). Details are shown for Namecounty. The data is filtered on Month Month and State Label. The Month Month filter keeps January 2018. The State Label filter keeps Central Equatoria, Eastern State (Map 2). Findings were triangulated with 4 Equatoria and Western Equatoria. The view is filtered on Latitude (generated), which keeps non-Null values only. insecurity. As a result, only limited information is 0 44 21 0 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) conducted in 4 10 1 100 available on the humanitarian situation outside Kapoeta Town with internally displaced persons of a few large towns and displacement sites. (IDPs) from Budi County, and secondary data, 11 20 ee ettleent In order to fill these information gaps and including other assessments conducted by Map based on Longitude (generated) and Latitude (generated) and Latitude (generated). For pane Latitude (generated): Color shows details about A.Indicator color (coverage). Details are shown for County and Month Month. For pane Latitude REACH in the Greater Equatoria region over communities across the Greater Equatoria(genera ted) (2): Size shofows Settle mensouthernt Size (Parameters). Details are shown for Nam ecoCentralunty. The data is filtered on Month Mon th aEquatoriand State Label. The Month Month filter keeps March 201State8. The State Label filter keep s Ce(Morobo,ntral Equatoria, Eastern facilitate humanitarian programming, REACH Equatoria and Western Equatoria. The view is filtered on Latitude (generated), which keeps non-Null values only. began collecting monthly data on hard-to- the reporting period. Primary data collection region from January to March 2018. The Yei, Lainya and Kajo-Keji Counties), in Mundri reach areas in the Greater Equatoria region was complemented by consultations with following analysis will summarize trends for the East County (Western Equatoria State) and fro January 2017 through interviews with Key humanitarian partners based in Yambio and Greater Equatoria region as well as analyse in Kapoeta South County (Eastern Equatoria 1 Informants (KIs). Between January and March Kapoeta towns. the three states separately. State). 2018, data was collected through phone call This Situation Overview provides a summary Population Movement and Due to the combination of relative safety interviews with KIs residing across the Greater of displacement trends in addition to access to around main towns and the beginning of the Equatoria region and who had direct knowledge food and basic services for both IDPs and host Displacement cultivation season in the Greenbelt area of Map 1: Counties in the Greater Equatoria Region, March 2018 Following episodes of heavy armed clashes South Sudan, some of those displaced by and large scale displacement at the end of conflict which began in July 2016 started Nagero Tambura 2017, lower intensity fighting continued to take returning from their displacement areas Mvolo place in the first quarter of 2018. While security outside and within South Sudan, mostly to Terekeka deteriorated in areas previously quiet such as settle in population centres perceived to be Mundri Lopa Ibba West Mundri Kapoeta Kapoeta Kapoeta South County, other areas were more secure and to look for income generating Ezo East North East Maridi quiet than through most of 2017, including activities. This has lead to a trend of urban Nzara Yambio Juba Kapoeta the western portion of Western Equatoria. displacement by IDPs returning from foreign South Yei Lainya Torit Budi The main towns of the Greater Equatoria or remote displacment sites and settling in Ikotos Kajo-Keji Magwi region were largely quiet, but armed clashes major towns, including Kapoeta, Torit, Juba, Morobo continued to displace populations in rural areas Yei, and Yambio. Whether these movements 1. ACLED. Political Violence and Protest Data - South Sudan. March 2018. Figure 1: Proportion of assessed settlements displacement caused by the recent clashes A REACH assessment in Yei County in March METHODOLOGY reporting IDP presence, March 2018 remains unknown. Finally, partners reported 2018 found a large numbers of IDPs who had To provide an overview of the situation displacement due to cattle raiding from returned from refugee settlements in Uganda in largely inaccessible areas of Greater 50%Yes Terekeka toward the town of Kuda, in Jubek from where they had been displaced since Equatoria, REACH uses primary data provided 4 50% No State, in late March. 2016, and who had settled in Yei town while by KIs living in or recently arrived from these Displacement toward urban areas waiting for the security situation in rural areas areas, or “Areas of Knowledge” (AoK). 50+50+A to become more stable.7 Those IDPs were As of 28 February, UNHCR reported that Information for this report was collected refugee settlements in most border areas often found to be occupying the homes of 1,053,598 refugees from South Sudan were primarily from newly arrived KIs from Greater such as Magwi, Torit, Ikotos, Kajo-Keji and people who were still in Uganda. in Uganda.5 The number of South Sudanese Equatoria to Yambio and Kapoeta Towns Lainya County. In March, 80% of assessed Temporary returns and supplemented with remote phone calls settlements reported that members of the local refugees present in Uganda has been stable to KIs living in the settlements of interest. community had returned to the settlement since July 2017, following a steep, sustained Another REACH assessment of displacement 6 The remote assessment involved in-depth following prior displacement. Among those, increase throughout the previous year. While between Moyo town in Uganda and Kajo interviews with participants selected through a 34% reported that returns had a large impact populations are still occasionally moving out Keji County also found that traditional and snowball sampling technique, where each KI on the population’s ability to access enough of South Sudan toward Uganda as a result of religious leaders from Kajo Keji County had bouts of small scale fighting in the southern was asked to name two addtional people who food in the settlement, including 100% of successfully negotiated safe access to South portion of Central Equatoria State, returns could be interviewed. A standardised survey assessed settlements in Lainya County. Sudanese refugees seeking to go cultivate are increasingly being reported. Following the tool was used that comprised questions on the land in February. This reportedly led to an 50% of assessed settlements reported trend in the rest of the Greater Equatoria region, displacement trends, population needs and increase in short trips across the border (Map access to basic services. IDP presence in March 2018, suggesting most of those returning to South Sudan settled 4).8 that many areas remain off limits and that in major towns as they do not feel safe enough After data collection was completed, all protracted displacement remains the rule in a Astose settlessed sbackettle mine theirnts r originaleportin grural yes settlements to average .o f the selected indicators - March 2018 data was examined at the settlement level, large portion of the Greater Equatoria region. 1 and settlements were assigned the modal Map 3: Percentage of assessed settlements in the Greater Equatoria region reporting IDP presence, 0% Central Equatoria State 1 - 20% response. When no consensus could be March 2018. 21 - 40% found for a settlement, it was not included in 41 - 60% Many instances of localized fighting caused 61 - 80% Nagero 81 - 100% reporting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report Issue # 23
    Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency type: Humanitarian crises Issue #: 23 Reporting Weeks: 26 & 27 Dr. Guracha, WHO OIC giving remarks during official launch of MDA by MOH in Juba Date: 24 June – 7 July 2019 .Photo: WHO JuPhoto information & photo credit Humanitarian Situation Update in South Sudan 7.1 M Need 1.9 M Internally 2.3M South Sudanese in Humanitarian Displaced Persons other countries Assistance with 0.2M living in PoC’s 6.96 M 860K 596K Malnourished Severely Food Malnourished Women Insecure Children Key Bi-Weekly Highlights Acute malnutrition 860,000 Acutely Malnourished 1 case of EVD was confirmed in Ariwara in Ituri Province of the DRC, 70 Kms from South 57 Stabilization Centers Sudan’s Kaya border in Yei River State. Cumulative vaccination WHO Rapid Response Team deployed to 182, 223 vaccinated with OPV Vaccine Nimule & Yei to strengthen EVD 167, 363 Vaccinated with Measles preparedness following confirmation of EVD case, 70 KMs from South Sudan’s Border. 7, 783 vaccinated against meningitis MOH & WHO in collaboration with the Ministry of Education jointly launched Public health threats country wide Mass Drug Administration in Juba targeting 1.5 million children. 02 EVD Alerts reported in Yei on 5 & 6 July 2019. MOH, WHO & partners conduct Training of Trainers on Severe Acute Malnutrition with 01 Suspected Cholera case reported in Juba Medical Complication. Protection of Civilians Site (POC3). PCR machine installed at the National Public Health Laboratory in Juba. Sample tested invalid -sent to UVRI for confirmation. 1 Virus Disease Overview of the Humanitarian Situation: humanitarian crises Almost 7 million people facing critical lack of food: 6.96 million (61% of population) people face acute food insecurity in South Sudan– according to UN sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Final Evaluation for “'I Love My Country': Strategic
    Combined Final Evaluation for “‘I Love My Country’: Strategic Communications for Peace Building in South Sudan” & Baseline Evaluation for “‘I Love My Country’: Promoting Localized Understanding and Peaceful Coexistence in South Sudan May 2017 Legal Notice and Disclaimer Photo courtesy of Search for Common Ground, https://www.sfcg.org/communicating-for-peace-in-south-sudan/ This report is not a legally binding document. It is a collaborative informational and assessment document and does not necessarily reflect the views of any of the contributing partners or funding agencies in all of its contents. Any errors are the sole responsibility of the authors. Copyright 2017 Forcier and Search for Common Ground. Forcier thanks our colleagues at Search for Common Ground for their cooperation and support with the Acknowledgments baseline evaluation of “‘I Love My Country’: Promoting Localized Understanding for Peaceful Coexistence” and the final evaluation of “‘I Love My Country’: Strategic Communications for Peace Building in South Sudan” as well as local residents from Bor, Juba and Mingkaman who took part in the research as survey enumerators and participants. 2| SFCG: Strategic Communications for Peace Building in South Sudan Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Juba, Central Equatoria Room
    Minutes of Health Cluster Meeting Time Venue April 3, 2019 WHO Conference 0900=1100 Juba, Central Equatoria Room Agenda Partners Present: AAHI,CARE , CASS, CMA, ,CORAID, GOAL, HI, IMC, IRW, JDF,MEDAIR, OVCI, 1. Welcome, introduction of participants. PUI,SCI, MI, WR,CASS,CHSS,CMD,CRDA,HAA, 2. Follow up on matters arising/actions from previous meeting. ,HCO,HFO,IHO, LIVEWELL, MEDICAIRE,NILE HOPE, 3. Context update UNIDO, RHS,SMC,TADO,THSO,TOCA, TRISS,MSF- NAWG F,IOM, UNICEF, WHO,MSF-S, ACF,HPF,IMA,RRF,ONO- 4. Discussion AID, IMA, RRF, IDSR Presentation Health Cluster Team: Magda, Dayib, David, SS-MUAC screening Report-WHO NO Partners Absent: ARC,CMMB, CHWF Core Pipeline update from WHO CUAM,MAGNA, MDM,RI,TDH, WVI,CIDO,UNH, 5. Technical Update, County Cold chain update and details, Update on Emergency Responders Meeting (ERM), EVD Partners update 6. AOB: TBD Meeting outcome Action Points Welcome and introduction- Done Presentation of the meeting agenda- Presented by HC Co-lead and seconded by UNH. Follow up on matters arising/actions from previous meeting. 1. HC to share the essential clinical package with HC partners to guide them while implementing SSHF projects. The guideline has been shared and partners are encouraging to refer to the guideline and flag any issues whenever unable to implement so that the bottlenecks can be discussed and strategies can be developed jointly. 2. HC to follow up with HPF to know the health development partners for Yei and Kajo-Keji under HPF III which is due to start on April 1, 2019 so that will figure out with the incoming health partner how to address the issue of ART in Kajo-Keji.
    [Show full text]
  • National Education Statistics
    2016 NATIONAL EDUCATION STATISTICS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FEBRUARY 2017 www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education & Instruction 2017 Photo Courtesy of UNICEF This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. The map used in this document is not the official maps of the Republic of South Sudan and are for illustrative purposes only. This publication has been produced with financial assistance from the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) and technical assistance from Altai Consulting. Soft copies of the complete National and State Education Statistic Booklets, along with the EMIS baseline list of schools and related documents, can be accessed and downloaded at: www.southsudanemis.org. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director of Planning and Budgeting / MoGEI [email protected] Giir Mabior Cyerdit / EMIS Manager / MoGEI [email protected] Data & Statistics Unit / MoGEI [email protected] Nor Shirin Md. Mokhtar / Chief of Education / UNICEF [email protected] Akshay Sinha / Education Officer / UNICEF [email protected] Daniel Skillings / Project Director / Altai Consulting [email protected] Philibert de Mercey / Senior Methodologist / Altai Consulting [email protected] FOREWORD On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am delighted to present The National Education Statistics Booklet, 2016, of the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). It is the 9th in a series of publications initiated in 2006, with only one interruption in 2014, a significant achievement for a new nation like South Sudan. The purpose of the booklet is to provide a detailed compilation of statistical information covering key indicators of South Sudan’s education sector, from ECDE to Higher Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment of the Mining Industry in South Sudan: Towards a Framework for Transparency and Accountability
    RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE MINING INDUSTRY IN SOUTH SUDAN: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY Peter Adwok Nyaba July 2019 Appreciation and acknowledgement This study, “Risk Assessment of the Mining Industry in South Sudan: Towards a ​ Framework for Transparency and Accountability”, was commissioned by Ebony Center ​ for Strategic Studies. It commenced in the second week of May 2019 and was completed by the first week of June. Mr. Azaria Gillo, a geologist working in the Ministry of Mining was my research assistant and his contribution led to the success of the research work. I thank him very much. The preliminary report of this study was discussed in an Ebony Centre’s function DPF/TF on Saturday 20 July 2019 attended by more than a hundred participants. The Under-Secretaries of the Ministries of Mining, Forestry and Environment as well as the Director of Environmental and Natural Resources Program in the Sudd Institute were the main discussants. Their technical and professional views were incorporated into the final report. I want to avail myself of this opportunity to appreciate and acknowledge the assistance rendered to us by the Under-Secretary, Dr. Andu Ezbon Adde, in granting permission to collect information and data from the Ministry of Mining data base and writing letters to the State Governments of Kapoeta and Juba to assist us in the research. Last but not least, my thanks and appreciation go to Ebony Center for Strategic Studies, for availing me the opportunity to undertake an exercise that is likely to contribute towards strengthening the institutions and instruments of the mining industry in the Republic of South Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • SITREP#109 24Feb 2017Final
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #109 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 24 February 2017 Situation Update A total of 13 counties in 9 (28%) of 32 states countrywide have confirmed cholera outbreaks (Table 1; Figure 1.0). The most recent cases were confirmed in Yirol East, Eastern Lakes state on 22 February 2017. Suspect cholera cases have been reported in Malakal Town; Pajatriei Islands, Bor county; Panyagor, Twic East county; and Moldova Islands, Duk county (Table 4). During week 8 of 2017, a total of 4 samples from Yirol East and 2 samples from Mayendit tested positive for cholera (Table 3). Cumulatively, 185 (37.8 %) samples have tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 24 February 2017 (Table 3). Table 1: Summary of cholera cases reported in South Sudan as of 24 February 2017 New New Total cases Total Reporting New deaths Total facility Total cases admissions discharges currently community Total deaths Total cases Sites WK 8 deaths discharged WK 8 WK 8 admitted deaths Jubek – Juba - - - - 8 19 27 2,018 2,045 Jonglei-Duk - - - - 3 5 8 92 100 Jonglei-Bor - 15 - 7 1 3 4 51 62 Terekeka - - - - - 8 8 14 22 Eastern Lakes 12 5 - 5 2 8 10 478 493 - Awerial Eastern Lakes 1 5 - 1 5 12 17 176 194 - Yirol East Imatong - - - - - - 1 1 28 29 Pageri Western Bieh - - - - - 4 - 4 266 270 Fangak Northern Liech - - - - 3 7 2 9 1,144 1,156 Rubkona Southern - - - - 3 - 3 91 94 Liech - Leer Southern Liech - - - - - 17 4 21 435 456 Panyijiar Southern Liech - 2 2 - - - 5 5 214 219 Mayendit Central Upper 5 181 Nile - Pigi 3 2 3 5 173 Total 18 29 - 19 55 67 122 5,180 5,321 Highlights in week 8 of 2017: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Report #99 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 15 December 2016
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #99 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 15 December 2016 Situation Update Cholera outbreaks were confirmed in 9 (32%) of 28 states countrywide. The affected states include Imatong, Eastern Lakes, Jubek, Terekeka, Jonglei, Western Bieh, Northern Liech, Southern Liech; and Eastern Nile (Table 1 and Figure 1.0). Suspect cholera cases were reported in Mayendit, Panyijiar, and Ayod (Table 4). Cumulatively 133 (34.2 %) of the samples tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 15 December 2016 (Table 3). Jubek state has recorded 2,006 cholera cases including 27 deaths (CFR 1.35 %). No new cholera case was reported in Jubek State during week 48 of 2016 (Table 1 and Figure 1.1). Active transmission is ongoing in Bentiu PoC where 118 new cases were reported in week 49 of 2016 (Annex 1). Ongoing transmission in the PoC is suspected to be associated with exposure to unsecured water reservoirs that are used for washing, bathing and swimming - largely in sectors 1, 2, and 3. The other factors include open defecation in the buffer zone around the water bodies; poor latrine use & poor inappropriate handing of child feces; and poor solid waste management. Table 1: Summary of cholera cases reported in South Sudan as of 15 December 2016 New New Total cases Total Reporting New deaths Total facility Total Total cases admission discharges currently community Total cases Sites WK 49 deaths deaths discharged s WK 49 WK 49 admitted deaths Jubek – - - - - 8 19 27 1,979
    [Show full text]
  • SITREP#92 28Oct 2016Final
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #92 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 28 October 2016 Situation Update Cholera outbreaks have been confirmed in 8 (28.6%) of 28 states countrywide. The affected states include Imatong, Eastern Lakes, Jubek, Terekeka, Jonglei, Western Bieh, Northern Liech, and Southern Liech (Figure 1.0). Suspect cholera cases have been reported in Mayendit, Ayod, and Pigi (Table 4). Cumulatively 101 (38.5%) of the samples tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 28 October 2016 (Table 3). Jubek state has recorded 1952 cholera cases including 14 deaths (CFR 0.72 %). A total of 24 new cholera cases reported in Jubek State during week 43 of 2016 (Table 1 and Figure 1.1). During the week, a new cluster of cases was reported in Gurei block 2, Northern Bari payam in Jubek. In response, surveillance, case management, social mobilization, hygiene promotion, and targeted oral cholera vaccination were initiated. Following the confirmation of cholera in Bentiu PoC on 21 October 2016, new cases continue to be reported among recent arrivals from Leer, Mayendit, Guit, Koch, and Panyijiar that were not vaccinated with oral cholera vaccine in 2015. During the week, a new cholera alert involving three suspect cases including one death was reported in Tayar, Ganyliel. Investigation and response activities have been initiated (Table 4). The implementation of sustained and comprehensive investigation and response activities in Leer, Mayendit, and Ayod continues to be constrained by security concerns. Response to suspect cholera cases in Pigi is ongoing with a total of 83 suspect cholera cases including 13 deaths reported since 15 October 2016 (Table 4).
    [Show full text]
  • SITREP#101 29Dec 2016Final
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #101 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 29 December 2016 Situation Update Cholera outbreaks were confirmed in 9 (32%) of 28 states countrywide. The affected states include Imatong, Eastern Lakes, Jubek, Terekeka, Jonglei, Western Bieh, Northern Liech, Southern Liech; and Eastern Nile (Table 1 and Figure 1.0). Suspect cholera cases were reported in Mayendit, Panyijiar, and Ayod (Table 4). Cumulatively 139 (34.6 %) of the samples tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 29 December 2016 (Table 3). Jubek state has recorded 2,006 cholera cases including 27 deaths (CFR 1.35 %). No new cholera case was reported in Jubek State during week 51 of 2016 (Table 1 and Figure 1.1). Table 1: Summary of cholera cases reported in South Sudan as of 29 December 2016 New New New Total cases Total Reporting Total facility Total cases Total admissions discharges deaths currently community Total deaths Sites deaths discharged cases WK 51 WK 51 WK 51 admitted deaths Jubek – - - - - 8 19 27 1,979 2,006 Juba Jonglei-Duk - - - - 5 3 8 84 92 Terekeka - - - - - 8 8 14 22 Eastern Lakes - - - - - 1 3 4 349 353 Awerial Imatong - - - - - - 1 1 28 29 Pageri Western Bieh - - - - - 4 - 4 266 270 Fangak Northern Liech - 101 98 - 30 6 2 8 759 797 Rubkona Southern - - - - 3 - 3 86 89 Liech - Leer Eastern Nile 5 168 - Pigi 5 163 Total 101 98 - 30 32 36 68 3,728 3,826 Active transmission is ongoing in Bentiu PoC where: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fao/Wfp Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to South Sudan
    World Food Programme S P E C I A L R E P O R T FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION TO SOUTH SUDAN 15 March 2019 Photographs: ©FAO/Md Islam. This report has been prepared by Alessandro Costantino and Wondimagegne Shiferaw (FAO) and Rogério Bonifácio (WFP) under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP Secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Mario Zappacosta Erika Joergensen Senior Economist, EST/GIEWS Regional Director Trade and Markets Division, FAO East and Central Africa (RBN), WFP E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ and http://www.wfp.org/food- security/reports/CFSAM The Special Reports can also be received automatically by e-mail as soon as they are published, by subscribing to the GIEWS/Alerts report ListServ. To do so, please send an e-mail to the FAO-Mail-Server at the following address: [email protected], leaving the subject blank, with the following message: subscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L To be deleted from the list, send the message: unsubscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L Please note that it is possible to subscribe to regional lists to only receive Special Reports by region: Africa (GIEWSAlertsAfrica-L), Asia (GIEWSAlertsAsia-L), Europe (GIEWSAlertsEurope-L) and Latin America (GIEWSAlertsLA-L). These lists can be subscribed to in the same way as the worldwide list.
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF South Sudan Humanitarian Situation July 2019
    UNICEF SOUTH SUDAN SITUATION REPORT JULY 2019 A health worker is trained on infection prevention and control in the context of Ebola, as part of UNICEF and South South Sudan’s Ebola prevention and preparedness efforts. Photo: UNICEF South Sudan/Wilson Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report JULY 2019: SOUTH SUDAN SITREP #134 SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights 1.83 million • In July 2019, UNICEF in collaboration with the Ministry of Health Internally displaced persons (IDPs) (national and state levels), WHO and other partners continued to create (OCHA South Sudan Humanitarian Snapshot, July 2019) awareness, engage and sensitize communities on Ebola in high-risk states reaching 208,669 people (101,938 men; 106,731 women). • On 23 July, 32 children were released from pro-Machar SPLA-iO in 2.32 million South Sudanese refugees in Mirmir, Unity State. All children were reunited with their families and are receiving reintegration services including comprehensive case neighbouring countries (UNHCR Regional Portal, South Sudan Situation management. 31 July 2019) • 26 July marked National Girls’ Education Day. In Juba, the event was hosted by the Jubek State Ministry of Education along with education 6.87 million partners. Approximately 1,085 girls from 15 schools took part in a rally South Sudanese facing acute food which included dance, drama, songs and poetry performances. insecurity or worse (May-July 2019 Projection, Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) UNICEF’s Response with Partners in 2019 Cluster for 2019 UNICEF and partners for 2019
    [Show full text]