DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Five Year Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Five Year Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual Action Plan City of Jersey City FY 2015 – 2019 Five Year Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual Action Plan Prepared for: Division of Community Development Department of Housing, Economic Development, and Commerce July 17, 2015 Consolidated Plan JERSEY CITY 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 5 ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ......................................................................... 5 2. The Process ............................................................................................................................................. 11 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) ........................................................................... 11 PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l) ................................................................................. 12 PR-15 Citizen Participation ...................................................................................................................... 21 3. Needs Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 24 NA-05 Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 24 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) .................................................................... 25 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ........................................ 33 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ............................ 36 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) .................................. 39 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) ..................................................... 41 NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) .......................................................................................................... 42 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c).................................................................................... 46 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) ............................................................ 48 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) ....................................................... 50 4. Housing Market Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 52 MA-05 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 52 MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) ............................................................................. 53 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) ............................................................... 56 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a)...................................................... 59 Consolidated Plan JERSEY CITY 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b) .................................................................................... 62 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) .............................................................................. 65 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) ....................................................................... 68 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210€ .................................................................................. 71 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) ...................................................... 73 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ....................................................................................... 79 5. Strategic Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 88 SP-05 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 88 SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) ............................................................................................ 89 SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2)......................................................................................................... 90 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) ................................................................................ 96 SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) ................................................................... 97 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k) ............................................................................... 100 SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4) ................................................................................................... 104 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) ......................................................... 108 SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.215(h) ................................................................................. 110 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d) ............................................................................................ 111 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards – 91.215(i) ......................................................................................... 114 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j) ............................................................................................... 116 SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230 ................................................................................................................... 118 6. Expected Resources .............................................................................................................................. 120 AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2) ......................................................................................... 120 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................... 125 AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d) ................................................................................................................... 128 AP-38 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................ 132 Consolidated Plan JERSEY CITY 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f) ........................................................................................... 175 AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g) ................................................................................................. 176 AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h) ......................................................................................................... 177 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i) .......................................................... 178 AP-70 HOPWA Goals - 91.220 (l)(3) ...................................................................................................... 181 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.220(j) ................................................................................. 182 AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k) .......................................................................................................... 184 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220(l)(1,2,4) .................................................................... 187 Citizen Participation Comments Unique Appendices SF-424 Forms and Certifications Consolidated Plan JERSEY CITY 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 1. Introduction The City of Jersey City Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) is mandated by federal law and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in order for the State to receive federal funding for affordable housing and community development initiatives benefitting primarily low- and moderate-income persons. This Con Plan consolidates into a single document the planning and application requirements for the following federal programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) Con Plans must be prepared and submitted to HUD every three to five years. The purpose of Jersey City’s Con Plan is to: Assess the City’s affordable housing and community development needs Analyze the City’s housing markets Articulate the City’s priorities, goals, and strategies to address identified needs, and Describe the actions the City will take to implement strategies for affordable housing and community development. The City’s Con Plan for fiscal years 2015-2019 provides data on trends and conditions related to Jersey City’s current and future affordable housing and community development needs. The analysis of this data has been used to establish priorities, strategies,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Housing Diversity and Affordability in New
    HOUSING DIVERSITY AND AFFORDABILITY IN NEW JERSEY’S TRANSIT VILLAGES By Dorothy Morallos Mabel Smith Honors Thesis Douglass College Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey April 11, 2006 Written under the direction of Professor Jan S. Wells Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy ABSTRACT New Jersey’s Transit Village Initiative is a major policy initiative, administered by the New Jersey Department of Transportation that promotes the concept of transit oriented development (TOD) by revitalizing communities and promoting residential and commercial growth around transit centers. Several studies have been done on TODs, but little research has been conducted on the effects it has on housing diversity and affordability within transit areas. This research will therefore evaluate the affordable housing situation in relation to TODs in within a statewide context through the New Jersey Transit Village Initiative. Data on the affordable housing stock of 16 New Jersey Transit Villages were gathered for this research. Using Geographic Information Systems Software (GIS), the locations of these affordable housing sites were mapped and plotted over existing pedestrian shed maps of each Transit Village. Evaluations of each designated Transit Village’s efforts to encourage or incorporate inclusionary housing were based on the location and availability of affordable developments, as well as the demographic character of each participating municipality. Overall, findings showed that affordable housing remains low amongst all the designated villages. However, new rules set forth by the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) may soon change these results and the overall affordable housing stock within the whole state.
    [Show full text]
  • NJNAHRO News REDEVELOPMENT OFFICIALS
    NEW JERSEY CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOUSING & NJNAHRO News REDEVELOPMENT OFFICIALS Volume 2, Issue 1 September 2012 Special points of interest: HUD Funding • Pg. 3 Madison HA wins award “DOING MORE WITH LESS” • Pg. 4 President’s Perspective The mantra of the federal Are the public housing pro- to deal with these reductions government to public housing gram and Housing Choice through one-shot budget gim- • Pg. 5 Summit Housing Authority authorities, for more than a Voucher programs failures and micks such as the “subsidy in the News decade, is that you “must do in need of elimination? In re- allocation adjustment.” Once • Pg. 6 Boonton Ceremony more with less.” Historically, cent years, Congress has not these one-shot gimmicks are funding for federal housing been providing adequate fund- exhausted, public housing op- • Pg. 7 Marion Sally Retires programs has been cyclical. ing for these programs which is erating subsidy will be at an all • Pg. 8 Middletown Housing Unfortunately, the industry has resulting in cuts in services and -time low which will lead to Authority-Energy Efficient been in a historically low fund- deferred maintenance. It ap- further cuts in staff, service ing cycle for an unusually long pears that the federal govern- and maintenance. • Pg. 9 2012 Scholarship Recipients period of time. It appears that ment cannot figure out whether While public housing au- • Pg. 10 Newark ED Testifies this pattern is part of an overall or not it wants to be in the sub- thorities continue to do more attempt to downsize and/or sidized housing business.
    [Show full text]
  • Lot Clean up Property Liens
    Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J. File No. Res. 21-233 Agenda No. 10.8 Approved: Mar 24 2021 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTIES LISTED HEREIN FOR THE COST OF REMOVING FROM THE PROPERTIES BRUSH, WEEDS, DEAD AND DYING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, NOXIOUS GROWTHS, FILTH, GARBAGE, LITTER AND DEBRIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.J.S.A.40:48-2.14 AND JERSEY CITY CODE SECTION 287-4 COUNCIL offered and moved adoption of the following resolution: COUNCIL offered and moved adoption of the following Resolution: WHEREAS, N.J.S.A. 40:48- 2.14 and Jersey City Code Sec 287-4 authorize municipalities by ordinance to require the owners of property to remove from their property or destroy brush, weeds, including ragweed, dead and dying trees, stumps, roots, obnoxious growths, filth, garbage, trash and debris within ten (10) days after notice to remove or destroy same; and WHEREAS, N.J.S.A 40:48-2.14 and Sec 287-4 provide that if owners fail to remove brush, stumps, debris, etc. from the property after receiving such notice, the City may do the removal and charge the costs to the owner; and if not paid, the governing body may cause the cost to become a lien against the properties; and WHEREAS, this lien may be enforced by the same officers and in the same manner as taxes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Jersey City Code Section 287-4, a Notice and Order directed the owners listed herein to remove from their property brush, stumps, debris, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Genealogy of the Vreeland Family
    .0^ . ^ovV : ^^^* • .rC^^'^.t.'^ . O .V . 4:^ "^^ o.* "^ v° *^' %- 'd- m^ ^^^ \ a/ "O* - '^^ .^'-^ "<*>. n"^ ,o«<.- -^^ ^ Vol •.°' ^^ aO ^ './ >:^^:- >. aV .^j^^^. Nicholas Garretson \'reeland. THHR BOOK: Wriltenarranged ^adaptgd BY ON E OF THEM WWW OIMT^oN VREELSIND Title parte and ofcher* di-awing/s by FR.flNCI5 WILLIAM Vl^EELflND^ Printed by CHflUNCELY H O L T- NOa7V^NDEPy%'" 3TIIEE.T • NEW YORK: HISTORY GENEALOGY of the VREELAND FAMILY Edited by NICHOLAS GARRETSON VREELAND HISTORICAL PUBLISHING CO. Jersey City, Nert) Jersey MDCCCCIX sT 1'^ \(\ •2> (At Copyright 1909 BY Nicholas G. Vrekland Cla.A,a3<* 112 JUL 28 1909 1 : table:contentsof CHAPTER. TITLE. PAGE. Foreword. 9 Preface. 10 PART FIRST — THE STORY OF HOLLAND. 1 In Day.s of Caesar 17 2 Fifteen Centuries of Struggle 20 3 The Dutch take Holland 21 4 Chaos leads to System 23 5 Dutch War Songs 24 Beggars of the Sea 24 Moeder Holland 29 Oranje Boven 30 6 Independence at Last 31 7 Holland and its People 33 8 Holland of To-day 41 PART SECOND — THE STORY OF AMERICA. 9 The American Birthright (Poem)... 49 10 In the New World, 1609-38 53 1 On Communipaw's Shore, 1646 57 12 Settlement of Bergen, 1660 59 13 Religion and Education 61 14 Battledore and Shuttlecock, 1664-74 63 15 Paulus Hook, 1800 66 16 From Youth to Manhood, 1840- 1909 69 17 Manners and Customs 73 18 Nomenclature 76 19 The True Dutch Influence 83 20 Land Titles 90 PART THIRD — THE STORY OF THE VREELANDS. 2 An Old Vreeland Family 99 22 The Town Vreeland, in Holland 104 CONTENTS—Continued.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Goals and Objectives Ii. Land Use Plan
    I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................ I-2 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. I-3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................. I-3 Housing.................................................................................................................................................... I-7 Circulation ................................................................................................................................................ I-8 Economic Development ......................................................................................................................... I-10 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................... I-11 Conservation ......................................................................................................................................... I-12 Community Facilities ............................................................................................................................. I-13 Parks and Recreation ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey State Research Guide Family History Sources in the Garden State
    New Jersey State Research Guide Family History Sources in the Garden State New Jersey History After Henry Hudson’s initial explorations of the Hudson and Delaware River areas, numerous Dutch settlements were attempted in New Jersey, beginning as early as 1618. These settlements were soon abandoned because of altercations with the Lenni-Lenape (or Delaware), the original inhabitants. A more lasting settlement was made from 1638 to 1655 by the Swedes and Finns along the Delaware as part of New Sweden, and this continued to flourish although the Dutch eventually Hessian Barracks, Trenton, New Jersey from U.S., Historical Postcards gained control over this area and made it part of New Netherland. By 1639, there were as many as six boweries, or small plantations, on the New Jersey side of the Hudson across from Manhattan. Two major confrontations with the native Indians in 1643 and 1655 destroyed all Dutch settlements in northern New Jersey, and not until 1660 was the first permanent settlement established—the village of Bergen, today part of Jersey City. Of the settlers throughout the colonial period, only the English outnumbered the Dutch in New Jersey. When England acquired the New Netherland Colony from the Dutch in 1664, King Charles II gave his brother, the Duke of York (later King James II), all of New York and New Jersey. The duke in turn granted New Jersey to two of his creditors, Lord John Berkeley and Sir George Carteret. The land was named Nova Caesaria for the Isle of Jersey, Carteret’s home. The year that England took control there was a large influx of English from New England and Long Island who, for want of more or better land, settled the East Jersey towns of Elizabethtown, Middletown, Piscataway, Shrewsbury, and Woodbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • WCARB Region 6 2017 Regional Summit Meeting Materials – Jersey City, NJ
    WCARB Region 6 2017 Regional Summit Meeting Materials – Jersey City, NJ 2017 NCARB Regional Summit AGENDA Hyatt Regency Jersey City Jersey City, NJ March 10-11, 2017 Thursday, March 9 6:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m. Icebreaker Reception and Summit Registration Liberty Science Center 222 Jersey City Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ 07305 Buses will begin departing from the hotel at 6:00 p.m. 8:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m. Guest Lecture Title: The 9/11 Memorial Museum: Memory, Authenticity, Scale, and Emotion Speakers: Carl Krebs, FAIA and Mark Wagner Davis Brody Bond AIA CES: 1.00 LU Carl Krebs, FAIA, architect of the 9/11 Memorial Museum, will explain the process that led to the design of the museum at Ground Zero and explore the issues surrounding the development of this historic site. Topics will include: • Preservation of public access to many of the surviving in-situ artifacts of the World Trade Center site, including the foundations of the Twin Towers, the slurry wall, and the “Survivors’ Stairs.” • Means of integrating exhibit content and narrative into architectural form. • Collaboration with family members, survivors, preservationists, community residents, scholars, and curators. Friday, March 10 7:30 a.m. Breakfast for Attendees and Guests Manhattan Ballroom, Ninth Floor 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. Plenary Session Hudson Ballroom, Third Floor • Welcome Edmeades/Erny • President Remarks Harding • Officer Candidate Speeches • Introduction of Resolutions Calvani 10:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Break 10:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Regional Meetings Lunch will be served in Regional Meetings Region 1- Harborside I, Third Floor Region 2- Holland I, Third Floor Region 3- Liberty II, Third Floor Region 4- Riverside, First Floor Region 5- Harborside II, Third Floor Region 6- Palisades III, Third Floor 6:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey City Community Violence Needs Assessment
    Jersey City Community Violence Needs Assessment Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Key Findings ................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 2 II. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 City Profile .................................................................................................................... 4 III. Needs Assessment Methodology ......................................................................................... 6 1. Focus Groups ............................................................................................................. 6 2. Stakeholder Interviews .............................................................................................. 6 3. Administrative Data Mapping ...................................................................................... 7 4. Limitations ................................................................................................................ 7 IV. Findings .............................................................................................................................. 7 1. Impacted Communities ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 19 Environmental Justice
    Chapter 19 Environmental Justice 19.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter considers whether minority populations and/or low-income populations would experience disproportionately adverse impacts from the proposed Project. It also discusses the public outreach efforts undertaken to inform and involve minority and low-income populations within the study area. 19.2 METHODOLOGY In accordance with Federal Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (February 11, 1994), this environmental justice analysis identifies and addresses any disproportionate and adverse impacts on minority and low-income populations that lie within the study area for the proposed Project. Executive Order 12898 also requires federal agencies to work to ensure greater public participation in the decision-making process. This environmental justice analysis was prepared to comply with the guidance and methodologies set forth in the DOT’s Final Environmental Justice Order (DOT 2012), FTA’s environmental justice guidance (FTA 2012), and the federal Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) environmental justice guidance (CEQ 1997). Consistent with those documents, this analysis involved the following basic steps: 1. Select a geographic analysis area based on where the proposed Project components may cause impacts; 2. Obtain and analyze relevant race, ethnicity, income and poverty data in the study area to determine where minority and low-income communities, if any, are located; 3. Identify the potential of the Build Alternative to adversely impact minority and low-income populations; 4. Evaluate the potential of the Build Alternative to adversely affect minority and low-income populations relative to the effects on non-minority and non-low-income populations to determine whether the Build Alternative would result in any disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority or low-income populations; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation Reso for 408-420 Communipaw Avenue
    Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J. File No. Res. 20-061 Agenda No. 10.18 Approved: Jan 23 2020 RESOLUTION OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY TO AMEND COUNCIL RESOLUTION 15-576 THAT AUTHORIZED AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND (AHTF) AGREEMENT WITH THE MORRIS CANAL REDEVELOPMENT AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR 408-420 COMMUNIPAW AVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL PRE-DEVELOPMENT FUNDS. (PROGRAMING) COUNCIL offered and moved adoption of the following resolution: WHEREAS, on September 28, 2005 the City of Jersey City adopted Ordinance 05-130 amending and supplementing Chapter 304, Article VI (Long Term Tax Exemptions) of the Jersey City code that established an Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF) from recipients of long term tax exemptions to adopt a spending plan; and WHEREAS, said spending plan authorizes the City to enter into contract with for profit or non-profit entities, organized under state and federal law for the purpose of constructing affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the City of Jersey City released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), and COAH Regional Contribution Agreement Recapture Funds (RCA) funding from August 31, 2018 to October 18, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund Committee met on April 11, 2018, May 2, 2018, and June 13, 2019 to review applications for the AHTF RFP; and WHEREAS, the eligible applicant must provide proof that it is the recipient of funds from other public or private source(s) that
    [Show full text]
  • PHASE I and II GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION of the RIVERSIDE PROJECT AREA
    PHASE I and II GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RIVERSIDE PROJECT AREA VOLUME 1: BACKGROUND, RESEARCH DESIGN, RESULTS, and CONCLUSIONS Prepared for: The Dermot Company, Inc. 729 7th Avenue, 15th Floor New York, NY 10019 Prepared by: Geoarcheology Research Associates 92 Main Street, Suite 207 Yonkers, NY 10701 Joseph Schuldenrein, Ph.D., R.P.A. Principal Investigator John A. Turck, Ph.D. Eva Hulse, Ph.D., R.P.A. Kevin Wiley, Ph.D., R.P.A. Rebecca Yamin, Ph.D., R.P.A. Joe Mazzariello, B.A. Acacia Berry, B.A. and Zenobie S. Garrett, Ph.D, R.P.A., editor With contributions by Diana Choi, Randa Harris, Julie Richko Labate, Molly Miranker, Jessica Vayo, and Rona Winter-Livneh February 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous city, state, and federal organizations contributed to the successful performance of the Riverside 2 project. The authors wish to thank, in particular, Mr. Drew Spitler of Dermott, Inc. for supporting and overseeing the cultural resources effort at Riverside 2 project over the course of GRA’s efforts (2012-2015). Without his singular support the project would not have proceeded as smoothly as it did. Mr. Parker Terrill and Mr. Mark Sangiorgi, both formerly of Dermot, served as liaisons between GRA and the client during the critical field phases of the work. Mr. Sangiorgi's interest in and appreciation of the work as well as his understanding of the compliance process allowed us to proceed with the transition from excavation to analysis and report writing phases with minimum difficulty. Ms. Amanda Sutphin, chief archaeologist for the New York City Landmarks Commission, was pivotal in the early negotiation phases of the Scope of Work, in facilitating contacts between the client and contractor, and in explaining the protocols and regulatory aspects of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Jersey City Zoning
    Adopted APRIL 11, 2001 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AREAS C 1 I T Amended OCTOBER 16, 2003 1 Armory Y 2 O Amended MARCH 10, 2004 2 Bates Street F N 3 O Amended APRIL 28, 2004 3 Bayfront I R T 4 H Amended JULY 15, 2004 4 Beacon B 5 E R Amended AUGUST 11, 2004 5 Beacon Avenue G 6 CITY OF JERSEY CITY E Amended SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 6 Betz Brewery N Amended OCTOBER 6, 20047 7 Block 239 Lot 47 Amended OCTOBER 27, 20048 8 Boland Street Amended FEBRUARY 9, 20059 9 Boyd McGuiness Park Amended MARCH 23, 200510 10 Bright Street Amended MAY 18, 200511 11 Bright and Varick re 12 n C ek Amended JUNE 22, 2005 12 Cambridge and North or h 13 n Amended SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 13 Canal Crossing Pe Amended NOVERMBER 18, 200514 14 Caven Point ZONING MAP 15 Amended FEBRUARY 22, 2006 15 Claremont 16 S Amended MARCH 22, 2006 16 Colgate U 17 UC CA Amended APRIL 12, 2006 17 Columbus Corner SE 18 F O Amended APRIL 26, 2006 18 Communipaw West Community Center N W 19 TO Amended MAY 24, 2006 19 Danforth Transit Village Amended JUNE 13, 200620 20 Dixon Crucible Amended SEPTEMBER 13, 200621 21 Droyers Point 22 ZONING DISTRICTS Amended OCTOBER 11, 2006 22 Exchange Place Amended JANUARY 24, 200723 23 Exchange Place North Amended FEBRUARY 14, 2007 24,25,26 24 Grand Jersey R-1 ONE AND TWO FAMILY HOUSING Amended FEBRUARY 15, 200727 25 Grand Street e U u Le N 28 n o IO e n N v ar Amended AUGUST 22, 2007 26 Green Villa d CI A St TY 29 R-1A ONE AND TWO FAMILY HOUSING e re l e e t Amended SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 27 Greenville Industrial n H n ag 30 o ue T St Amended MARCH 12, 2008 28 Gregory Park
    [Show full text]