DOCSLIB.ORG

Three Hundred Fifty Years of the Royal Society: Fellows of Vision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Three Hundred Fifty Years of the Royal Society: Fellows of Vision SPECIAL ARTICLE Three Hundred Fifty Years of the Royal Society Fellows of Vision C. Richard Keeler, FRCOphth(Hon) he 350th anniversary of the Royal Society was celebrated in November 2010. This Brit- ish society is the oldest scientific institution in the world, with 8200 fellows, includ- ing foreign members, having been elected during this period. Sir Isaac Newton is just one of the world’s great scientists who have served as officers of the Royal Society. To- Tday there are 69 Nobel Laureates among the membership of 1400. BEGINNINGS math in an era of many polymaths and is most famous today as an architect and the In the middle of the 17th century, civil war creator of St Paul’s Cathedral (Figure 1). was raging in England. King Charles I had In 1657, Wren had moved to the com- commandeered Oxford and set up a roy- parative safety of London and had be- alist coterie within the colleges. Among his come professor of astronomy at age 25 medical advisers were his physician Dr Wil- years at Gresham College. He was one of liam Harvey (1578-1657), Dr Thomas Wil- 7 professors, each specializing in a sub- lis (1621-1675), and Dr Charles Scar- ject: astronomy, geometry, physics, law, burgh (1614-1694). In time of war, good divinity, rhetoric, and music. doctors and surgeons were highly valued. On November 28, 1660, after giving one In 1646, a sick 14-year-old boy named of his weekly lectures, 12 men who had Christopher Wren (1632-1723) was sent been attending the lecture met to discuss by his father to be under the care of Scar- the possibility of setting up a new insti- burgh at his home in Oxford. Soon, Wren tution, a society for promoting physico- became the technical assistant and infor- mathematical experimental learning. mal apprentice to Scarburgh. This was to become the Royal Society, Together they explored Harvey’s work which just celebrated its 350th anniver- on the functioning of the body as an or- sary. The new philosophy was to experi- gan. Every Thursday, Wren attended lec- ment, inquire, and interrogate nature by tures at Surgeons’ Hall. By the age of 16 observation, not by theory. Their inspira- years, he had become a builder of ma- tion came from Sir Francis Bacon, who chines and models, including one of the dreamed of science operating in the way human eye for his master. of a collaboration, or a fellowship, hence In 1649, he went to Wadham College, the adoption of the word fellow. one of the university colleges; he took his The founding members decided on the master’s degree 2 years later. It was during more informal European Academy and de- this time that he grew close to Willis, known bating type of organization rather than an today as the founder of neurology. It was institution for their new society. English later in 1663 that Wren, who was now an would be the primary language, not Latin. accomplished draftsman, became involved On November 28, 1660, 40 prominent in making many of the meticulous draw- people were proposed. ings for Willis’s famous book, Cerebri Ana- Wren became a major influence in gain- tome. Wren was an extraordinary poly- ing royal approval when he showed Charles II (Figure 2) his greatly magnified image Author Affiliation: The Royal College of Ophthalmologists, London, England. of a louse. The king was even more im- ARCH OPHTHALMOL / VOL 129 (NO. 10), OCT 2011 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM 1361 ©2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021 fellows were doing. It was not until 1831 that peer review of the ar- ticles was instigated. In addition to Wren, Scarburgh, and Willis, the founding fellows in- cluded the Dutch astronomer, math- ematician, and optician Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695) and Robert Boyle (1627-1691), referred to by foreigners as “the English Philoso- pher.” This prolific experimenter had already established Boyle’s law. His list of 24 wishes that he hoped science would achieve in the future to make life better for people makes fascinating reading. Included in the Figure 1. Sir Christopher Wren, by Johann list are “the art of flying” and “the Closterman. Reprinted with permission from the making of parabolic and hyper- Royal Society. bolic glasses.” Figure 3. Title page of volume I of Philosophical Transactions, 1665. Reprinted with permission From its commencement, the from the Royal Society. Royal Society has been interna- tional in outlook, including having furnish [the Society] every day on a foreign secretary 100 years before which they met, with three or four the British government. Foreigners considerable experiments, and ex- became members of the Royal Soci- pecting no recompence till the so- ety, not fellows, and membership ciety should get a stock enabling was not always selected from the well them to give it.” born. For instance, in the 1670s, An- From the very beginning, the tonie van Leeuwenhoek (1623- Royal Society was considered a place 1723) was a simple Dutch shop- for experimentation. The weekly keeper turned microscopist who meeting, where members could bring went on to describe microorgan- their demonstrations to educate and isms for the first time. Of ophthal- entertain, was not entirely success- mic interest was his discovery of the ful as too many of the members just layer of rods of the retina, the fi- expected to be entertained. Hooke brous structure of the lens, and the was himself one of the most active ex- Figure 2. King Charles II, by Sir Peter Lely. fibroepithelial layer of the cornea. All Reprinted with permission from the Royal Society. perimenters, bringing to the Royal So- of his discoveries, reported in 200 ciety the first effective compound mi- articles in low Dutch between 1673 pressed by a lunar globe, which Wren croscope, the first iris diaphragm, and and 1724, were published in Philo- had created out of pasteboard, show- a range of new meteorological instru- sophical Transactions. ing the moon’s surface in incredible ments. In his 1665 book Micro- detail. He presented a new version of graphia, Hooke stated SIR ISAAC NEWTON this as a gift to the king in person. By means of Telescopes, there is noth- AND THE 18TH CENTURY The Royal Society was granted its ing so far distant but may be repre- first charter in July 1662, followed sented to our view; and by the help of The names of some notable people by the second in 1663. This second Microscopes, there is nothing so small, elected fellows in the first 20-year pe- charter declared the king as the as to escape our enquiry; hence there is riod stand out, such as William Penn a new visible world discovered to the founder and patron and from hence- 1 and Samuel Pepys, but probably the forth the group could call them- understanding. greatest of all fellows in the Royal So- selves The Royal Society of London At the instigation of the first sec- ciety’s long history has been Sir Isaac for Improving Natural Knowledge, retary, Henry Oldenburg, in 1665 the Newton (1643-1727) (Figure 4). He to give it its full title. The coat of Philosophical Transactions Giving was elected a fellow in 1671 at the age arms had as its motto “Nullius in Some Account of the Present Under- of 28 years, having presented to the Verba”—take no man’s word for it. takings, Studies, and Labours of the In- Royal Society 2 years earlier a 6-inch- This new organization, under the genious in Many Considerable Parts long reflecting telescope he had made patronage of the ruling monarch, has of the World, or simply Philosophi- with his own hands (Figure 5). In become the world’s oldest scien- cal Transactions (Figure 3), started 1687, after just 18 months from when tific society, with its continuous exis- to be published. It remains the he embarked on it, he completed what tence for more than 350 years. world’s longest such publication. many regard as the most important In 1662, Robert Hooke was ap- Many letters were printed in it, and scientific work ever published, Phi- pointed curator. His brief was “to it was a way of communicating what losophiae Naturalis Principia Math- ARCH OPHTHALMOL / VOL 129 (NO. 10), OCT 2011 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM 1362 ©2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021 Figure 4. Sir Isaac Newton. Engraving from a Figure 5. Reflecting telescope made by Isaac portrait by Sir Godfrey Kneller. Newton, 1671. Reprinted with permission from the Royal Society. ematica (Figure 6), known simply Figure 7. Manuscript of Sir Isaac Newton’s as Principia (Figure 7). Despite a Principia, 1685. Reprinted with permission from shortage of funds, the Royal Society the Royal Society. undertook its publication. Pepys was the president at the time and put his imprimatur on the title page, al- though he probably did not under- stand a word of the book’s contents. The Royal Society started a li- brary in 1661 with the understand- ing that fellows would donate a copy of any book they had published. Among the many writers over the de- cades was Charles Darwin, who complied and presented a signed copy of his Origin of the Species. Today there are 50 antiquarian books on ophthalmology in the li- brary. As a result of the fame that Principia established for Newton, he became president of the Royal Soci- Figure 6. Title page of Principia by Sir Isaac Figure 8. Benjamin Franklin, by Joseph Wright, Newton, 1671.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official Publication of the Optometric Historical Society
    Official Publication of the Optometric Historical Society Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History publishes material on the history of optometry and related topics. As the official publication of the Optometric Historical Society, Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History supports the purposes and functions of the Optometric Historical Society. The purposes of the Optometric Historical Society, according to its by-laws, are: ● to encourage the collection and preservation of materials relating to the history of optometry, ● to assist in securing and documenting the recollections of those who participated in the development of optometry, ● to encourage and assist in the care of archives of optometric interest, ● to identify and mark sites, landmarks, monuments, and structures of significance in optometric development, and ● to shed honor and recognition on persons, groups, and agencies making notable contributions toward the goals of the society. Officers and Board of Trustees of the Optometric Historical Society (with years of expiration of their terms on the Board in parentheses): President: John F. Amos (2015), email address: [email protected] Vice-President: Alden Norm Haffner (2014) Secretary-Treasurer: Chuck Haine (2016) Trustees: Jerry Abrams (2013) Arol Augsburger (2013) Irving Bennett (2016) Jay M. Enoch (2014) Morton Greenspoon (2015) Alfred Rosenbloom (2015) The official publication of the Optometric Historical Society, published quarterly since its beginning, was previously titled: Newsletter of the Optometric Historical Society, 1970-1991 (volumes 1-22), and Hindsight: Newsletter of the Optometric Historical Society, 1992-2006 (volumes 23-37). Use of the current title, Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History, began in 2007 with volume 38, number 1. On the cover: An image of the Chambers-Inskeep Ophthalmometer when it was introduced in 1899, from the May 24, 1899 issue of Jewelers Review (volume 32, page 652).
    [Show full text]
  • Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy by George Biddell Airy 1
    Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy by George Biddell Airy 1 CHAPTER I. CHAPTER II. CHAPTER III. CHAPTER IV. CHAPTER V. CHAPTER VI. CHAPTER VII. CHAPTER VIII. CHAPTER IX. CHAPTER X. CHAPTER I. CHAPTER II. CHAPTER III. CHAPTER IV. CHAPTER V. CHAPTER VI. CHAPTER VII. CHAPTER VIII. CHAPTER IX. CHAPTER X. Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy by George Biddell Airy The Project Gutenberg EBook of Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy by George Biddell Airy This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy by George Biddell Airy 2 License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy Author: George Biddell Airy Release Date: January 9, 2004 [EBook #10655] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SIR GEORGE AIRY *** Produced by Joseph Myers and PG Distributed Proofreaders AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF SIR GEORGE BIDDELL AIRY, K.C.B., M.A., LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., HONORARY FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, ASTRONOMER ROYAL FROM 1836 TO 1881. EDITED BY WILFRID AIRY, B.A., M.Inst.C.E. 1896 PREFACE. The life of Airy was essentially that of a hard-working, business man, and differed from that of other hard-working people only in the quality and variety of his work. It was not an exciting life, but it was full of interest, and his work brought him into close relations with many scientific men, and with many men high in the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Wren's 'Tracts' on Architecture and Other Writings, by Lydia M
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College History of Art Faculty Research and Scholarship History of Art 2000 Review of Wren's 'Tracts' on Architecture and Other Writings, by Lydia M. Soo David Cast Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Custom Citation Cast, David. Review of Wren's 'Tracts' on Architecture and Other Writings, by Lydia M. Soo. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 59 (2000): 251-252, doi: 10.2307/991600. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs/1 For more information, please contact [email protected]. produced new monograph? In this lished first in 1881, have long been used fouryears later under the titleLives of the respect, as in so many others, one fin- by historians: byJohn Summerson in his Professorsof GreshamCollege), which evi- ishes reading Boucher by taking one's still seminal essay of 1936, and by Mar- dently rekindledChristopher's interest hat off to Palladio.That in itself is a garet Whinney, Eduard Sekler, Kerry in the project.For the next few yearshe greattribute to this book. Downes, and most notably and most addedmore notations to the manuscript. -PIERRE DE LA RUFFINIERE DU PREY recently by J. A. Bennett. And the his- In his own volume,John Wardreferred Queen'sUniversity at Kingston,Ontario tory of their writing and printings can be to this intendedpublication as a volume traced in Eileen Harris's distinguished of plates of Wren'sworks, which "will study of English architectural books.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Articles
    Articles Articles ALEXI BAKER “Precision,” “Perfection,” and the Reality of British Scientific Instruments on the Move During the 18th Century Résumé Abstract On représente souvent les instruments scientifiques Early modern British “scientific” instruments, including du 18e siècle, y compris les chronomètres de précision, precision timekeepers, are often represented as static, comme des objets statiques, à l’état neuf et complets en pristine, and self-contained in 18th-century depictions eux-mêmes dans les descriptions des débuts de l’époque and in many modern museum displays. In reality, they moderne et dans de nombreuses expositions muséales were almost constantly in physical flux. Movement and d’aujourd’hui. En réalité, ces instruments se trouvaient changing and challenging environmental conditions presque constamment soumis à des courants physiques. frequently impaired their usage and maintenance, Le mouvement et les conditions environnementales especially at sea and on expeditions of “science” and difficiles et changeantes perturbaient souvent leur exploration. As a result, individuals’ experiences with utilisation et leur entretien, en particulier en mer et mending and adapting instruments greatly defined the lors d’expéditions scientifiques et d’exploration. Ce culture of technology and its use as well as later efforts sont donc les expériences individuelles de réparation at standardization. et d’adaptation des instruments qui ont grandement contribué à définir la culture de la technologie. In 1769, the astronomer John Bradley finally the calculation of the distance between the Earth reached the Lizard peninsula in Cornwall and the Sun. Bradley had not needed to travel with his men, instruments, and portable tent as far as many of his Transit counterparts, but observatory after a stressful journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Wren and the English Baroque
    What is English Baroque? • An architectural style promoted by Christopher Wren (1632-1723) that developed between the Great Fire (1666) and the Treaty of Utrecht (1713). It is associated with the new freedom of the Restoration following the Cromwell’s puritan restrictions and the Great Fire of London provided a blank canvas for architects. In France the repeal of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 revived religious conflict and caused many French Huguenot craftsmen to move to England. • In total Wren built 52 churches in London of which his most famous is St Paul’s Cathedral (1675-1711). Wren met Gian Lorenzo Bernini (1598-1680) in Paris in August 1665 and Wren’s later designs tempered the exuberant articulation of Bernini’s and Francesco Borromini’s (1599-1667) architecture in Italy with the sober, strict classical architecture of Inigo Jones. • The first truly Baroque English country house was Chatsworth, started in 1687 and designed by William Talman. • The culmination of English Baroque came with Sir John Vanbrugh (1664-1726) and Nicholas Hawksmoor (1661-1736), Castle Howard (1699, flamboyant assemble of restless masses), Blenheim Palace (1705, vast belvederes of massed stone with curious finials), and Appuldurcombe House, Isle of Wight (now in ruins). Vanburgh’s final work was Seaton Delaval Hall (1718, unique in its structural audacity). Vanburgh was a Restoration playwright and the English Baroque is a theatrical creation. In the early 18th century the English Baroque went out of fashion. It was associated with Toryism, the Continent and Popery by the dominant Protestant Whig aristocracy. The Whig Thomas Watson-Wentworth, 1st Marquess of Rockingham, built a Baroque house in the 1720s but criticism resulted in the huge new Palladian building, Wentworth Woodhouse, we see today.
    [Show full text]
  • Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P
    Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P. McCaskey Stanford University Abstract: Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here. Induction in the Scholastic and the (so-called) Humean tradition has presumed that Aristotle meant going from particular statements to universal statements. But the alternate view, namely that Aristotle meant going from particular things to universal ideas, prevailed all through antiquity and then again from the time of Francis Bacon until the mid-nineteenth century. Recent scholarship is so steeped in the first-mentioned tradition that we have virtually forgotten the other. In this essay McCaskey seeks to recover that alternate tradition, a tradition whose leading theoreticians were William Whewell, Francis Bacon, Socrates, and in fact Aristotle himself. The examination is both historical and philosophical. The first part of the essay fills out the history. The latter part examines the most mature of the philosophies in the Socratic tradition, specifically Bacon’s and Whewell’s. After tracing out this tradition, McCaskey shows how this alternate view of induction is indeed employed in science, as exemplified by several instances taken from actual scientific practice. In this manner, McCaskey proposes to us that the Humean problem of induction is merely an artifact of a bad conception of induction and that a return to the Socratic conception might be warranted. Introduction Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here.
    [Show full text]
  • SIR BENJAMIN COLLINS BRODIE, BART.: Threatened Invasion, Young Benjamin, with His Two a SKETCH.1 Elder Brothers, Raised a Company of One Hundred and Volunteers
    He had eager physical vigor too, though he was Original Articles small of Btature and delicate of frame; and his patriot- ism flamed out in season. In 1798, when Napoleon SIR BENJAMIN COLLINS BRODIE, BART.: threatened invasion, young Benjamin, with his two A SKETCH.1 elder brothers, raised a company of one hundred and volunteers. He was commissioned BY JAMES G. MUMFORD, M.D., BOSTON. forty ensign by the king. It was a fine, well-drilled and creditable A year ago, after publishing an essay on Sir Astley body of recruits. 1 waB asked to write of Cooper, something Benjamin Such a boyhood was in the back Brodie. 1 have done and the has lent itself great surgeon's so, subject ground ; but beyond this he was fortunate in family pleasantly to the task. connections, professional and others, which counted to Of Brodie I found soon that this knows generation him for good. His grandfather was the little be is read seldom students and other readora grandfather ; by also of that Thomas, Lord Denman who was tho advo of our medical literature, yet the man was in some cate of tho unhappy Queen Caroline, and Chief Justice ways a great man ; not so great, doubtless, as Cooper, of the King's Bench, later. His paternal grand- fifteen his but a in hi« years senior, striking figure mother was a daughter of a well-known physician, Dr. time; as a teacher, sound and resourceful ; as a writer, Samuel Shaw. One daughter of this lady married facile and instructive ; as a physician, accomplished Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Transactions (A)
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS (A) FOR THE YEAR 1889. A. A bney (W. de W.). Total Eclipse of the San observed at Caroline Island, on 6th May, 1883, 119. A bney (W. de W.) and T horpe (T. E.). On the Determination of the Photometric Intensity of the Coronal Light during the Solar Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363. Alcohol, a study of the thermal properties of propyl, 137 (see R amsay and Y oung). Archer (R. H.). Observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of Extension of the Coronal Streamers at Hog Island, Grenada, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382. Atomic weight of gold, revision of the, 395 (see Mallet). B. B oys (C. V.). The Radio-Micrometer, 159. B ryan (G. H.). The Waves on a Rotating Liquid Spheroid of Finite Ellipticity, 187. C. Conroy (Sir J.). Some Observations on the Amount of Light Reflected and Transmitted by Certain 'Kinds of Glass, 245. Corona, on the photographs of the, obtained at Prickly Point and Carriacou Island, total solar eclipse, August 29, 1886, 347 (see W esley). Coronal light, on the determination of the, during the solar eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363 (see Abney and Thorpe). Coronal streamers, observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382 (see A rcher). Cosmogony, on the mechanical conditions of a swarm of meteorites, and on theories of, 1 (see Darwin). Currents induced in a spherical conductor by variation of an external magnetic potential, 513 (see Lamb). 520 INDEX.
    [Show full text]
  • James Short and John Harrison: Personal Genius and Public Knowledge
    Science Museum Group Journal James Short and John Harrison: personal genius and public knowledge Journal ISSN number: 2054-5770 This article was written by Jim Bennett 10-09-2014 Cite as 10.15180; 140209 Research James Short and John Harrison: personal genius and public knowledge Published in Autumn 2014, Issue 02 Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/140209 Abstract The instrument maker James Short, whose output was exclusively reflecting telescopes, was a sustained and consistent supporter of the clock and watch maker John Harrison. Short’s specialism placed his work in a tradition that derived from Newton’s Opticks, where the natural philosopher or mathematician might engage in the mechanical process of making mirrors, and a number of prominent astronomers followed this example in the eighteenth century. However, it proved difficult, if not impossible, to capture and communicate in words the manual skills they had acquired. Harrison’s biography has similarities with Short’s but, although he was well received and encouraged in London, unlike Short his mechanical practice did not place him at the centre of the astronomers’ agenda. Harrison became a small part of the growing public interest in experimental demonstration and display, and his timekeepers became objects of exhibition and resort. Lacking formal training, he himself came to be seen as a naive or intuitive mechanic, possessed of an individual and natural ‘genius’ for his work – an idea likely to be favoured by Short and his circle, and appropriate to Short’s intellectual roots in Edinburgh. The problem of capturing and communicating Harrison’s skill became acute once he was a serious candidate for a longitude award and was the burden of the specially appointed ‘Commissioners for the Discovery of Mr Harrison’s Watch’, whose members included Short.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Darwin Plagiarize His Evolution Theory? — Bergman
    Countering the critics Did Darwin plagiarize his evolution theory? — Bergman this book de Maillet Did Darwin suggested that fish were the precursors of birds, mammals, plagiarize his and men.7 Yet an- other pre-Darwin evolution theory? scientist was Pierre- Louis Maupertuis Jerry Bergman (1698–1759) who in 1751 concluded in his Some historians believe that all of the major contri- book that new species butions with which Darwin is credited in regard to may result from the Courtesy TFE Graphics Courtesy evolution theory, including natural selection, actually fortuitous recombin- were plagiarized from other scientists. Many, if not ing of different parts most, of Darwin’s major ideas are found in earlier of living animals. works, especially those by his grandfather Erasmus At about this Darwin. Charles Darwin rarely (if ever) gave due same time the French credit to the many persons from whom he liberally encyclopedist, Denis Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802) ‘borrowed’. This review looks at the evidence for Diderot (1713–1784), this position, concluding that much evidence exists taught that all animals evolved from one primeval organ- to support this controversial view. ism. This prototype organism was fashioned into all those types of animals alive today via natural selection. George Louis Buffon (1707–1788) even expounded the idea at length that ‘the ape and man had a common ancestry’ and, A common (but erroneous) conclusion is that Charles further, that all animals had a common ancestor.8 Macrone Darwin conceived modern biological evolution, including concluded that, although Darwin put evolution on a firmer natural selection.1 An example of statements commonly scientific basis found in the scientific literature indicating this would be the ‘ … he was hardly the first to propose it.
    [Show full text]
  • the Papers Philosophical Transactions
    ABSTRACTS / OF THE PAPERS PRINTED IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, From 1800 to1830 inclusive. VOL. I. 1800 to 1814. PRINTED, BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT AND COUNCIL, From the Journal Book of the Society. LONDON: PRINTED BY RICHARD TAYLOR, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. CONTENTS. VOL. I 1800. The Croonian Lecture. On the Structure and Uses of the Meinbrana Tympani of the Ear. By Everard Home, Esq. F.R.S. ................page 1 On the Method of determining, from the real Probabilities of Life, the Values of Contingent Reversions in which three Lives are involved in the Survivorship. By William Morgan, Esq. F.R.S.................... 4 Abstract of a Register of the Barometer, Thermometer, and Rain, at Lyndon, in Rutland, for the year 1798. By Thomas Barker, Esq.... 5 n the Power of penetrating into Space by Telescopes; with a com­ parative Determination of the Extent of that Power in natural Vision, and in Telescopes of various Sizes and Constructions ; illustrated by select Observations. By William Herschel, LL.D. F.R.S......... 5 A second Appendix to the improved Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy, inserted in the Philosophical Transactions for the Year 1798, containing some further Remarks, and improved Formulae for computing the Coefficients A and B ; by which the arithmetical Work is considerably shortened and facilitated. By the Rev. John Hellins, B.D. F.R.S. .......................................... .................................. 7 Account of a Peculiarity in the Distribution of the Arteries sent to the ‘ Limbs of slow-moving Animals; together with some other similar Facts. In a Letter from Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Linnean Vol 31 1 April 2015 Press File.Indd
    TheNEWSLETTER AND PROCEEDI LinneanNGS OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Volume 31 Number 1 April 2015 Harbingers: Orchids: The Ternate Essay: Darwin’s evolutionary A botanical and Revisiting the timeline forefathers surgical liaison and more… A forum for natural history The Linnean Society of London Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF UK Toynbee House, 92–94 Toynbee Road, Wimbledon SW20 8SL UK (by appointment only) +44 (0)20 7434 4479 www.linnean.org [email protected] @LinneanSociety President SECRETARIES COUNCIL Prof Dianne Edwards CBE FRS Scienti fi c The Offi cers () Prof Simon Hiscock Vice Presidents President-Elect Dr Francis Brearley Prof Paul Brakefi eld Dr Malcolm Scoble Prof Anthony K Campbell Vice Presidents Editorial Dr Janet Cubey Ms Laura D'Arcy Prof Paul Brakefi eld Prof Mark Chase FRS Prof Jeff rey Duckett Prof Mark Chase Dr Pat Morris Dr John David Collecti ons Dr Thomas Richards Dr Anjali Goswami Dr John David Prof Mark Seaward Prof Max Telford Treasurer Strategy Dr Michael R Wilson Prof Gren Ll Lucas OBE Prof David Cutler Dr Sarah Whild Ms Debbie Wright THE TEAM Executi ve Secretary Librarian Conservator Dr Elizabeth Rollinson Mrs Lynda Brooks Ms Janet Ashdown Financial Controller & Deputy Librarian Digiti sati on Project Offi cer Membership Offi cer Mrs Elaine Charwat Ms Andrea Deneau Mr Priya Nithianandan Archivist Emerita Linnaean Project Conservators Buildings & Offi ce Manager Ms Gina Douglas Ms Helen Cowdy Ms Victoria Smith Ms Naomi Mitamura Special Publicati ons Manager Communicati ons & Events Ms Leonie Berwick Manager Mr Tom Simpson Manuscripts Specialist Dr Isabelle Charmanti er Room Hire & Membership Educati on Offi cer Assistant Mr Tom Helps Ms Hazel Leeper Editor Publishing in The Linnean Ms Gina Douglas The Linnean is published twice a year, in April and October.
    [Show full text]