December 2016 Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
US Fleet Organization, 1939
US Fleet Organization 1939 Battle Force US Fleet: USS California (BB-44)(Force Flagship) Battleships, Battle Force (San Pedro) USS West Virginia (BB-48)(flagship) Battleship Division 1: USS Arizona (BB-39)(flag) USS Nevada (BB-36) USS Pennsylvania (BB-38)(Fl. Flag) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 1-9 VOS Battleship Division 2: USS Tennessee (BB-43)(flag) USS Oklahoma (BB-37) USS California (BB-44)(Force flagship) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 2-9 VOS Battleship Division 3: USS Idaho (BB-42)(flag) USS Mississippi (BB-41) USS New Mexico (BB-40) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 3-9 VOS Battleship Division 4: USS West Virginia (BB-48)(flag) USS Colorado (BB-45) USS Maryland (BB-46) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 4-9 VOS Cruisers, Battle Force: (San Diego) USS Honolulu (CL-48)(flagship) Cruiser Division 2: USS Trenton (CL-11)(flag) USS Memphis (CL-13) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 2-4 VSO Cruiser Division 3: USS Detroit (CL-8)(flag) USS Cincinnati (CL-6) USS Milwaukee (CL-5) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 3-6 VSO Cruise Division 8: USS Philadelphia (CL-41)(flag) USS Brooklyn (CL-40) USS Savannah (CL-42) USS Nashville (CL-43) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 8-16 VSO Cruiser Division 9: USS Honolulu (CL-48)(flag) USS Phoneix (CL-46) USS Boise (CL-47) USS St. Louis (CL-49)(when commissioned Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 8-16 VSO 1 Destroyers, Battle Force (San Diego) USS Concord (CL-10) Ship Air Unit 2 VSO Destroyer Flotilla 1: USS Raleigh (CL-7)(flag) Ship Air Unit 2 VSO USS Dobbin (AD-3)(destroyer tender) (served 1st & 3rd Squadrons) USS Whitney (AD-4)(destroyer tender) -
Review of Armenian Studies 31 No
SPECIAL ISSUE: Centenary of the Armenian Resettlement REVIEW OF ARMENIAN STUDIES A Biannual Journal of History, Politics and International Relations 31no: 2015 Sina AKŞİN Uluç GÜRKAN Tal BUENOS Birsen KARACA Sadi ÇAYCI Jean-Louis MATTEI Sevtap DEMİRCİ Armand SAĞ Maxime GAUIN Turgut Kerem TUNCEL Christopher GUNN BOOK REVIEW Michael M. GUNTER Jeremy SALT REVIEW OF ARMENIAN STUDIES A Biannual Journal of History, Politics and International Relations 2015, No: 31 EDITOR Ömer Engin LÜTEM MANAGING EDITOR Aslan Yavuz ŞİR EDITORIAL BOARD In Alphabetical Order Prof. Dr. Seçil KARAL AKGÜN Ömer E. LÜTEM (Ret. Ambassador) Prof. Dr. Hüseyin BAĞCI (Middle East Technical University) Prof. Dr. Nurşen MAZICI (Marmara University) Prof. Dr. Nedret KURAN BURÇOĞLU (Boğaziçi University) Prof. Dr. Nesib NESSİBLİ (Khazar University) Prof. Dr. Sadi ÇAYCI (Başkent University) Prof. Dr. Hikmet ÖZDEMİR (Political Scientist) Prof. Dr. Kemal ÇİÇEK (İpek University) Prof. Dr. Hüseyin PAZARCI Dr. Şükrü ELEKDAĞ Prof. Dr. Mehmet SARAY (Ret. Ambassador) (Historian) Prof. Dr. Temuçin Faik ERTAN Dr. Bilal N. ŞİMŞİR (Institute of History of Turkish Revolution) (Ret. Ambassador, Historian) Dr. Erdal İLTER Dr. Pulat TACAR (Historian) (Ret. Ambassador) Alev KILIÇ (Ret. Ambassador, Director of the Center for Eurasian Studies) ADVISORY BOARD In Alphabetical Order Ertuğrul APAKAN Dr. Ayten MUSTAFAYEVA (Ret. Ambassador) (Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences) Prof. Dr. Edward ERICKSON Jeremy SALT (Historian) Prof. Dr. Norman STONE Prof. Dr. Michael M. GUNTER (Bilkent University) (Tennessee Technological University) Prof. Dr. Ömer TURAN Prof. Dr. Enver KONUKÇU (Middle East Technical University) Prof. Dr. Jean-Louis MATTEI Prof. Dr. Hakan YAVUZ (Historian) (Utah University) Prof. Dr. Justin MCCARTHY (University of Louisville) PUBLISHER Ali Kenan ERBULAN Review of Armenian Studies is published biannually Review of Armenian Studies is a refereed journal. -
US Ships in Commission, Under Construction, and in Mothballs 1 September 1939
US Ships in Commission, Under Construction, and in Mothballs 1 September 1939 Ships in commission (Total 339 ships) Battleships USS Arizona (BB-39) USS Arkansas (BB-33) USS California (BB-44) USS Colorado (BB-45) USS Idaho (BB-42) USS Maryland (BB-46) USS Mississippi (BB-41) USS Nevada (BB-36) USS New Mexico (BB-40, ex-California) USS New York (BB-34) USS Oklahoma (BB-37) USS Pennsylvania (BB-38) USS Tennessee (BB-43) USS Texas (BB-35) USS West Virginia (BB-48) Aircraft Carriers USS Enterprise (CV-6) USS Lexington (CV-2, ex CC-1, ex Constitution) USS Ranger (CV-4) USS Saratoga (CV-3, ex CC-3) USS Yorktown (CV-5) Heavy Cruisers USS Astoria (CA-34, ex CL-34) USS Augusta (CA-31, ex CL-31) USS Chester (CA-27, ex CL-27) USS Chicago (CA-29, ex CL-29) USS Houston (CA-30, ex CL-30) USS Indianapolis) (CA-35, ex CL-35) USS Lousiville (CA-28, ex CL-28) USS Minneapolis (CA-36, ex CL-36) USS New Orleans (CA-32, ex CL-32) USS Northampton (CA-26, ex CL-26) USS Pensacola (CA-24, ex CL-24) USS Portland (CA-33, ex CL-33) USS Quincy (CA-39, ex CL-39) USS Salt Lake City (CA-25, ex CL-25) USS San Francisco (CA-38, ex CL-38) USS Tuscaloosa (CA-37, ex CL-37) USS Vincennes (CA-44, CL-44) USS Wichita (CA-45) Light Cruisers USS Boise (CL-47) USS Brooklyn (CL-40) USS Cincinnati (CL-6, ex CS-6) USS Concord (CL-10, ex CS-10) USS Detroit (CL-8, ex CS-8) USS Honolulu (CL-48) USS Marblehead (CL-12, ex CS-12) 1 USS Memphis (CL-13, ex CS-13) USS Milwaukee (CL-5, ex CS-5) USS Nashville (CL-43) USS Omaha (CL-4, ex CS-4) USS Philadelphia (CL-41) USS Phoenix (CL-46) USS Raleigh (CL-7, ex CS-7) USS Richmond (CL-9, ex CS-9) USS St. -
US Navy and Coast Guard Vessels, Sunk Or Damaged Beyond
Casualties: U.S. Navy and Coast Guard Vessels, Sunk or Damaged Beyond Repair during World War II, 7 December 1941-1 October 1945 U.S. Navy Warships Mine Warfare Ships Patrol Ships Amphibious Ships Auxiliaries District Craft U.S. Coast Guard Ships Bibliography U.S. Navy Warships Battleship (BB) USS Arizona (BB-39) destroyed by Japanese aircraft bombs at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 7 December 1941, and stricken from the Navy List, 1 December 1942. USS Oklahoma (BB-37) capsized and sank after being torpedoed by Japanese aircraft at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 7 December 1941. Aircraft Carrier (CV) USS Hornet (CV-8) sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese aircraft during the Battle of Santa Cruz, Solomon Islands, 26 October 1942. USS Lexington (CV-2) sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese aircraft during the Battle of the Coral Sea, 8 May 1942. USS Wasp (CV-7) sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese submarine I-19 south of Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands, 15 September 1942. USS Yorktown (CV-5) damaged by aircraft bombs on 4 June 1942 during the Battle of Midway and sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese submarine I-168, 7 June 1942. Aircraft Carrier, Small (CVL) USS Princeton (CVL-23) sunk after being bombed by Japanese aircraft during the Battle of Leyte Gulf, Philippine Islands, 24 October 1944. Aircraft Carrier, Escort (CVE) USS Bismarck Sea (CVE-95) sunk by Kamikaze aircraft off Iwo Jima, Volcano Islands, 21 February 1945. USS Block Island (CVE-21) sunk after being torpedoed by German submarine U-549 northwest of the Canary Islands, 29 May 1944. -
0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom. -
THE GOVERNOR of HAW All
DEP:2\RTMENT OF THE INTERIOR REPORT OF THE GOVERNOR OF HAW All TO THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1924 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1924 CONTENTS Page lntroduct.ion_____________ ~--------- ------------------------------ 1 Hawaiian homes settlement ____ --------------------------- __ --- 1 Bill of rights approved ________ ---- __ - _________________________ _ 2 Equal rights of citizenship____ ---- ___ - __________________ - ______ _ 2 Budget system for the Tei'ritory _____ - __________________ - ______ _ 2 Tourist, facilities _______ - - - - --- - _ --- - - -- _ - ----_____ -----______ _ 2 Hawaii National Park ________________________________________ _ 2 N'ational defense~- ______________ - _· _____________ ----__________ _ 2 Hawaii's strategic harbors __________ -- _______ --------__________ _ 3 Foreign-language school litigation_ - ________________ - ___________ _ Elections ________________________________________________________ _ 4 4 Haw~iian birth registration __________ ---___ ----________ - ____ - ______ _ 8 C!)unty and city and county governments_____________________ .______ _ 10 Fmances ____ - - __________ - _ -- - - __ --- - -- ·- - ----- - - --- - - ---- - - - - - - - - - 10 Territorial bonded indebtedness.___ - - ___ - --- __ -----_ ----_ - ______ _ 11 Receipts and disbursements, general_ __________________________ _ 12 Miscellaneous funds_ - ___ - - - - ---- - - _____ -- _ - -- ____ - ___ - - ______ _ 13 Taxes collected, etc_____ ·-- - - - - __ - - ---- ------- _________ --- _____ -
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe” by C.S
1. STAFF REPORTS / ITEMS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update The last major update of the Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan was in 1997. A partial amendment was completed in June 2003. The Comprehensive Plan policies suggest updating the plan every 10 to 15 years. The following principle steps are being proposed to launch a process to update the Comprehensive Plan, Although the Comprehensive Plan update will be coordinated by retaining a consulting firm, the following steps are proposed, before a consulting firm can be retained. Timeline 1. Discuss scope of work with the Planning Commission and City Council. (December 2016) 2. City Manager, Staff and Departments to review the needs for RFP, RFQ or RFI process. (January 2017) 3. Advertise (1 month) for retaining a consulting firm. (February-March 2017) 4. Interview consultants and retain one team (1 month). (March-April 2017) 5. Comprehensive Plan process to be completed in approximately 18 months Revisions to the Current Comprehensive Plan Chapter 1 – Introduction • This chapter will need to be completely updated to document the process used in the Comprehensive Plan update, as well as modifications that have occurred to other documents (i.e. Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, Engineering Design Manual). • Evaluate Section 1.6, what worked, what did not work. Chapter 2 – Development Opportunities and Constraints • Update city limit boundaries, zoning districts and base maps to reflect current data. (1997 plan has data from 1995). • Revised building condition survey in the center of the city. • Are there sections in this chapter that should be deleted (i.e. soils), or sections that need to be added or strengthen? Yes-allow section to remain with updates. -
Sugar-Coated Fortress: Representations of the Us Military in Hawai'!
SUGAR-COATED FORTRESS: REPRESENTATIONS OF THE U. S. MILITARY IN HAWAI'!. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AMERICAN STUDIES DECEl\1BER 2004 By Brian Ireland Dissertation Committee: David Stannard, Chairperson Floyd Matson Robert Perkinson Kathy Ferguson Ira Rohter ABSTRACT Hawai'i is the most militarized state in the nation. There has always been opposition to the U.S. military presence in Hawai'i. However, critics ofthe military face a difficult task in getting their message across. Militarism has been so ingrained in Hawai'i that, to a large extent, the U.S. military presence has come to be seen as "natural," necessary, and almost totally beneficial. A result ofthis is that it has become both easy and comfortable to view current militarism in Hawai'i as natural, normal, ordinary, and expected. This dissertation shows how this seemingly normal state of affairs came to be. By examining various representations ofthe U.S. military in Hawai'i - in newspapers, movies, memorials, museums, and military writing - I expose how, in forms ofrepresentation, places ofremembrance, and the construction ofhow we speak and write about the military, militarism becomes the norm and, in turn, silences counter narratives. The dissertation examines four distinct time periods, 1778 to 1898 (from Captain Cook to the annexation ofHawai'i by the U.S.), 1898-1927 (the period in which the U.S. consolidated its hold on Hawai'i through cultural imperialism and military build-up), 1927-1969 (which saw the growth ofmass tourism, the Massie Case, the attack on Pearl Harbor, martial law and Statehood), and 1965-present (covering the post-Statehood years, the Vietnam War, increasing militarization ofHawai'i, the Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement, and the Ehime Maru tragedy). -
See Page 2 Extra Extra! Reunion Friendly Network Changes Name
Bringing reunions and locations together since 1991 magazineVOL 18 | MAY/JUNE 2017 SEE PAGE 2 EXTRA EXTRA! REUNION FRIENDLY NETWORK CHANGES NAME. Military Reunion Network | MAY/JUNE 2017 | #militaryreunionsmatter FROM THE situationDESK It is official, “The Reunion Friendly Network” waivered. There has been a commitment to is now “The Military Reunion Network”. It is a veterans and the military for 25 years under change that has been in the back of my mind for Military Reunion Network. well over a year. I reached out to my dear friend, The Military Reunion Network is a network of Paul Spiewak, RFN founder, for his thoughts, people sharing a common interest and goal, to although he is not involved with the company any hold great reunions! It is also a communication longer, he said, “GO FOR IT!” network consisting of this magazine, Salute, our Founded in 1991, The Reunion Network, as it was weekly newsletter, an interactive Facebook page, originally named, supported veterans through a website AND our weekly radiocast. Each part education and resources. TRN offered step by compliments another. A post on our Facebook step instruction on the process including topics page may turn into an interview on the radiocast. A of creating RFP’s, conducting site inspections, Convention Visitor Bureau member may appear in negotiation, and contracts to name a few. The team one of our featured destinations. traveled the country connecting reunion planners The new name better reflects who we are and the with the hospitality industry. In 1998, the name community we serve. was changed to Reunion Friendly Network while maintaining the same focus and format. -
The Armenian Forced Relocation: Putting an End to Misleading Simplifications (Ermeni Zorunlu Göçü: Aldatici Basitleştirmelere Son Vermek)
THE ARMENIAN FORCED RELOCATION: PUTTING AN END TO MISLEADING SIMPLIFICATIONS (ERMENİ ZORUNLU GÖÇÜ: ALDATICI BASITLEŞTIRMELERE SON VERMEK) Maxime GAUIN Specialist at the Center for Eurasian Studies Abstract: This paper studies three aspects of the Turkish-Armenian conflict. First of all, contrary to what the main Armenian and pro- Armenian affirm, there were hundreds of thousands, likely 500,000 Armenians, who were exempted of relocation, particularly in Istanbul, Western and Central Anatolia as well as in the Arab provinces. Then, the policy of the Ottoman government vis-à-vis the Armenian exiles was a protective ones, even if this protection failed in a considerable number of cases. The orders from Istanbul are clear. In particular, it is false to assert that the Ottoman government did not provide food and opposed the foreign relief. Such accusations are based on manipulation of evidence and neglect Ottoman as well as American and German sources. The relocation of 1915-16 is also misrepresented if described as the only reason for the losses of the Ottoman Armenian community between 1914 and 1922. In fact, the Russian relocation and the flow of refugees have to be considered, as well as the direct responsibilities of the Armenian extremists in the emigration of Armenians from Cilicia during the French withdrawal and the Greek scorched earth policy in 1922, which included the forced exile of the Christians from Western Anatolia. Keywords: Armenian Revolutionary Federation, Committee of Union and Progress, Greece, Social Democratic Hunchakian Party, Ottoman Empire, racism, Russia, Turkish War of Independence. Öz: Bu makale Türk-Ermeni ihtilafının üç konusunu incelemektedir. -
In This Issue
Bringing reunions and locations together since 1991 magazineVOL 19 | SEPT/OCT 2017 IN THIS ISSUE THE LEGACY OF BOB HOPE LIVES ON JOE WAS BURIED IN THE RUBBLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER THE LIFE CHANGING IMPACT OF MILITARY REUNIONS THE NEW MRN SPEAKERS BUREAU Military Reunion Network | SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2017 | #militaryreunionsmatter FROM THE situationDESK The second annual MRN Educational Summit concluded in late June. It was a great success due in part to the amazing presenters. Joan Eisenstodt, Crystal Washington, Michelle Lenz and Bruce Yungman returned to share their expertise in the breakout sessions. Convention Visitor Representatives from Visit Erie and Visit Galveston shared best practices when working with CVB’s. Our guest speakers will be remembered for a long time to come for their inspirational contribution to the event. We were honored to have Retired NYC Firefighter Lt. Joe Torrillo take the general session stage to share how his day unfolded on September 11, 2001. There was also a serious announcement made at Every time he tells his story, he keeps a promise to the Summit this year. My conversations, inquires remember the 343 fire fighters that lost their lives and official interviews have led me to conclude that day. Joe’s engaging yet humble style focused that military reunions are critical to our veteran on rebuilding both life and country with a sense of community in a wide variety of ways. Our critical purpose and resolve. (see page 4) mission at The Military Reunion Network is to help Our second guest speaker was none other than “Mr. -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: _ Ewa Plain Battlefield__________________________________________ Other names/site number: _Ewa Mooring Mast Field, Marine Corps Air Station, Ewa, State SIHP Site 5127________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ________________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: _____________________________________________ City or town: _ _Kapolei__________ State: ___Hawaii_________ County: Honolulu Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination