DOCSLIB.ORG

NEXT-ITS 2 Evaluation Report Dörge, Lone; Penttinen, Merja; Kulmala, Risto; Antola, Petri; Ström, Martin; Viktorsson, Carlos; Sage, Dieter; Wold, Håkon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEXT-ITS 2 Evaluation Report Dörge, Lone; Penttinen, Merja; Kulmala, Risto; Antola, Petri; Ström, Martin; Viktorsson, Carlos; Sage, Dieter; Wold, Håkon This document is downloaded from the VTT’s Research Information Portal https://cris.vtt.fi VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland NEXT-ITS 2 Evaluation Report Dörge, Lone; Penttinen, Merja; Kulmala, Risto; Antola, Petri; Ström, Martin; Viktorsson, Carlos; Sage, Dieter; Wold, Håkon Published: 01/01/2018 Link to publication Please cite the original version: Dörge, L., Penttinen, M., Kulmala, R., Antola, P., Ström, M., Viktorsson, C., Sage, D., & Wold, H. (2018). NEXT- ITS 2 Evaluation Report. European ITS Platform. VTT By using VTT’s Research Information Portal you are bound by the http://www.vtt.fi following Terms & Conditions. P.O. box 1000FI-02044 VTT I have read and I understand the following statement: Finland This document is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of this document is not permitted, except duplication for research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered for sale. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 NEXT-ITS 2 Evaluation Report NEXT-ITS 2 2015-2017 Version: 1.0 - Final Date: January 2018 www.its-platform.eu . Document Information Authors NAME ORGANISATION Lone Dörge Genua Consult, Denmark Merja Penttinen VTT, Finland Risto Kulmala Finnish Transport Agency, Finland Petri Antola Finnish Transport Agency, Finland Martin Ström Swedish Transport Administration, Sweden Carlos Viktorsson Sweco, Sweden Dieter Sage Logos HH, Germany Håkon Wold ViaNova Plan og Trafikk, Norway Distribution DATE VERSION DISSEMINATION 07/11/2017 0.1 Working group 15/12/2017 0.2 Working group 18/12/2017 0.3 Working group 21/12/2017 0.9 Project Management Board (Draft) 09/01/2018 0.99 Working group, for final quality check 15/01/2018 1.0 Project Management Board NEXT-ITS 2 Evaluation Report Version 1.0 2/92 Table of Contents Document Information .................................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 6 2 Description of the Problem ................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Issues Addressed ......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Site description ............................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Research Questions ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Objectives for the Evaluation ........................................................................................ 9 3 Description of the ITS Project ............................................................................................. 10 3.1 ITS Selection Rationale and Objectives ...................................................................... 10 3.2 Status of the Project.................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Systems and Technologies Applied ............................................................................ 10 3.4 ITS Deployment Status (Deployment KPIs)................................................................. 11 4 Evaluation ............................................................................................................................ 14 4.1 Research Questions Answered ................................................................................... 14 4.2 Methods ...................................................................................................................... 14 4.3 Timing and Type of Evaluation .................................................................................... 17 4.4 Technical Performance ............................................................................................... 17 4.5 Selected Benefit KPIs ................................................................................................. 17 4.6 Results........................................................................................................................ 18 5 Cost Benefit Analysis Results ............................................................................................ 19 5.1 Approach .................................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Costs .......................................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Benefits....................................................................................................................... 21 5.4 Benefit Cost Ratio ....................................................................................................... 23 6 Overall Assessment & Transferability of the Results (European Dimension) ................. 23 6.1 Overall Assessment .................................................................................................... 23 6.1.1 Deployment ....................................................................................................... 24 6.1.2 Safety ................................................................................................................ 25 6.1.3 Efficiency ........................................................................................................... 25 6.1.4 Environment ...................................................................................................... 25 6.2 Transferability of results (European Dimension) .......................................................... 25 6.2.1 Relevance to ITS Priority Areas and Actions ...................................................... 26 7 References ........................................................................................................................... 27 8 Measure 1 – TMC renewal and adaptation to corridor management and control systems, FI 29 NEXT-ITS 2 Evaluation Report Version 1.0 3/92 8.1 Measure descriptions; how NEXT-ITS 2 measures have improved the services ......... 29 8.2 The relation to NEXT-ITS1 (and if to continue in NEXT-ITS3) ..................................... 31 8.3 Network(s) affected by the measure, Network description & Network statistics - and assumptions behind the calculations, data sources................................................................ 32 8.4 Deployment KPIs + status of the deployments ............................................................ 35 8.5 Technical performance of the systems in operation; How the goals were reached by the deployments .......................................................................................................................... 36 8.6 References ................................................................................................................. 36 9 Measure 2 – Motorway Control System, Sweden .............................................................. 37 9.1 Measure descriptions; how NEXT-ITS 2 measures have improved the services ......... 37 9.2 Explain the relation to NEXT-ITS1 (and if to continue in NEXT-ITS3) ......................... 39 9.3 Network affected by the measure, Network description & Network statistics - and assumptions behind the calculations, data sources................................................................ 39 9.4 Deployment KPIs ........................................................................................................ 40 9.5 Status of the deployments........................................................................................... 41 9.6 Technical performance of the systems in operation; How the goals were reached by the deployments .......................................................................................................................... 41 10 Measure 3 – Integrated Traffic Management, Sweden....................................................... 42 10.1 Measure descriptions; how NEXT-ITS 2 measures have improved the services ......... 42 10.2 Explain also the relation to NEXT-ITS1 (and if to continue in NEXT-ITS3) .................. 44 10.3 Network affected by the measure, Network description & Network statistics - and assumptions behind the calculations, data sources................................................................ 44 10.4 Deployment KPIs ........................................................................................................ 45 10.5 Status of the deployments........................................................................................... 46 10.6 Technical performance of the systems in operation; How the goals were reached by the deployments .......................................................................................................................... 46 11 Measure 4 – New Traffic Management Centre in “The Traffic Tower” in Copenhagen ... 47 11.1 Measure description; how NEXT-ITS 2 measure has improved services .................... 47 11.2 Network(s) affected by the measure, Network description & Network statistics - and assumptions behind the calculations, data sources................................................................ 52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VIKING Overview of ITS Evaluation Results in MIP1
    EasyWay VIKING 2007-2012 Overview of ITS evaluations 2007-2012 Version: 0.9 Date: 15 June 2013 EasyWay is a project co-financed by the European Commission (DG MOVE) www.easyway-its.eu EasyWay VIKING Overview of evaluations Ver 0.9 15/06/2013 2 EasyWay VIKING Overview of evaluations Ver 0.9 15/06/2013 Document Information Document: EasyWay VIKING Overview of ITS evaluations 2007-2012 Date of issue: 15/6/2013 Author: Lone Dörge (DK) Genua Consult, Denmark Contributors: Risto Kulmala (FI) Merja Penttinen (FI) Håkon Wold (NO) Anders Lindkvist (SE) Peter von Heidenstam (SE) Pernilla Wistrand (SE) Dieter Sage (DE) Status: 0.9 Document history: Version Date Distribution Ver 0.7 2013-05-21 Internal EasyWay VIKING Evaluation Group Ver 0.9 2013-06-15 Public (EasyWay Final Report) 3 EasyWay VIKING Overview of evaluations Ver 0.9 15/06/2013 Executive summary The objective of this report is to provide an overview of ITS evaluations in the VIKING area (Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Lithuania, Estonia and Northern Germany) reported during EasyWay I 2007-2009 and EasyWay II 2010-2012. The report also contains results obtained outside the EasyWay programme during that period. The overview may be used as a supporting tool for ITS decision makers and professionals to find ITS evaluation results achieved by others and to inform about what have actually been conducted in the field of ITS evaluation in the EasyWay VIKING area. 4 EasyWay VIKING Overview of evaluations Ver 0.9 15/06/2013 Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose and scope of the report .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Road Administration Report of Activities and Financial Statements 2002
    Finnish Road Administration Report of Activities and Financial Statements 2002 Internal publications 20/2003 Finnish Road Administration Report of Activities and Financial Statements 2002 Internal publications 20/2003 Finnish Road Administration Helsinki 2003 ISSN 1458-1561 TIEH 4000362E-v Helsinki 2003 Finnish Road Administration CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION Steering Opastinsilta 12 A PO Box 33 FIN-00521 Helsinki, Finland Tel. +358 204 2211 Finnish Road Administration Report of Activities and Financial Statements 2002 3 Contents 1 OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES 5 1.1 Operating philosophy 5 1.2 Operating environment 6 1.2.1 Road network and traffic 6 1.2.2 Trends in cost level 7 1.3 The Finnish Road Administration’s organization 8 1.4 Implementation of the road administration reform 10 1.4.1 Competitive tendering in road management 10 1.4.2 Adjustment of the Finnish Road Enterprise personnel 11 1.5 International activities 12 1.6 Research and development 13 1.7 Resources 14 1.7.1 Road management funding 14 1.7.2 Personnel 16 1.7.3 Premises and real estate 17 1.7.4 Capital assets 18 2 RESULTS 19 2.1 Economy and productivity of activities 19 2.1.1 Road management 19 2.1.2 Finnra’s expenses from activities 24 2.2 Effectiveness of activities 25 2.3 Client opinion of the services provided 27 2.4 Performance targets set by the Ministry 28 2.5 Cost responsibility of activities subject to charge 32 3 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND APPENDICES 34 3.1 Financial statements 34 3.2 Information to supplement the statements in the final accounts 37 3.3 Analysis of the final accounts 48 4 INTERNAL AUDIT 53 5 SIGNATURES 55 Finnish Road Administration Report of Activities and Financial Statements 2002 5 OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES 1 OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES 1.1 Operating philosophy The Finnish Road Administration (Finnra) is responsible for the public roads in Finland and their development as part of the transport system.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Therapeutic Effects of New Ruthenium (III)
    crystals Article Potential Therapeutic Effects of New Ruthenium (III) Complex with Quercetin: Characterization, Structure, Gene Regulation, and Antitumor and Anti-Inflammatory Studies (RuIII/Q Novel Complex Is a Potent Immunoprotective Agent) Moamen S. Refat 1,*, Reham Z. Hamza 2,* , Abdel Majid A. Adam 1, Hosam A. Saad 1,* , Adil A. Gobouri 1, Fawziah A. Al-Salmi 2, Tariq A. Altalhi 1 and Samy M. El-Megharbel 1 1 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Main Campus, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] (A.M.A.A.); [email protected] (A.A.G.); [email protected] (T.A.A.); [email protected] (S.M.E.-M.) 2 Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Main Campus, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.S.R.); [email protected] (R.Z.H.); [email protected] (H.A.S.) Citation: Refat, M.S.; Hamza, R.Z.; Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of the Adam, A.M.A.; Saad, H.A.; Gobouri, III new [Ru(Q)(Cl)2(H2O)2] complex (Ru /Q). A new vital complex containing quercetin flavonoid A.A.; Al-Salmi, F.A.; Altalhi, T.A.; compound (Q) with ruthenium (III) ions was synthesized. The molar conductivity of the RuIII/Q El-Megharbel, S.M. Potential complex was measured in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) with value 12 (W−1 mol−1 cm−1, indicating Therapeutic Effects of New their non-electrolytic nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Espoon Ja Kauniaisten Bussilinjat
    38, 203(N,V) 227, 217, 218, 219, Laaksolahti 231N, 202 219, 227, 219, 235N, 235N, 236, 555(B) 235N, 235N, 533 Dalsvik 582 565(B) 239, 548 214 215 202, 38 Konala 231N Kånala Pihlajarinne 203(N,V) Ring III Rönnebacka Lippajärvi 219 227, Klappträsk 217, 218, Lintuvaara 533, 235N, 236, 202, Fågelberga 231N 565(B) 239, 548 555(B) 214, 219 206A, 218, 219, 207 Ring I 238, 242, Viherlaakso 224, 226, 226A, 540(B), 243, 245 226(A) 554 Gröndal 229 227 203(N,V), Kehä I Kehä III 231N 540(B), Nupurintie 217, 218, 217, 218, 214, 38 226A, 224, 226(A), 218, 224, 206A, 215, 202, 203(N,V), 554 566 226(A), 218, 219, 227, 215, 219, 246(K,KT) 236, 239, 227, 235, 226(A), 227, 214, 217, 235, 236, 224, 231N, 555(B) 201(B) 236, 238, 235, 236, 238, 239, 532 226(A), 227, 548 226(A), Turunväylä 239 238, 239 227, 201 235, 238 201, 202, 201 227, 235N, 582 236, 201(B), Åbovägen 238, 203(N,V), 201 Nupurbölevägen 226A, Turuntie 227, 235, 206A, 231N, 540(B), 217, 218, Kehä II 206A, 214, 239 201B 217, 218, 15.8. 280 246(K,KT), Bemböle 238 217, 555(B) 554 231N, 215, 217, 218, 566 226(A), 235, 238, 532 231N, 235, 235, 226 II Ring 219, 224, 201B, 217, 218, 550, 554K Åboleden 238, 245 549, 565(B) 226(A), 227, 114, 217, 218, 550, 226A, 227N 224, 114, 231N, 235, 550, 554K 235, 235, 236, 206A 235, 532 554K Espoon ja Kauniaisten 227, 235(N), 531 232 548 206, 238, 239, Mäkkylä 280 245, 246(K,KT), 226A,227, 238, 533, 549 217 206(A) 532 235(N), 238, 531, 542 212 532 531, 542, 206(A), Kilo 565(B), 566, 531, 542, 542, 549 242.
    [Show full text]
  • NORDICUM.Com on Rebranding Finland 360! € Featuring
    Real Estate SPECIAL REPORT 2010 CAPITAL POWER: Turku – European Capital of Culture 2011 Helsinki – World Design Capital 2012 Helsinki Metropolitan Region Strategy Unveiled DKK 42,00 NOK 47,00 Simon Anholt EUR 6,60 SEK 49,00 NORDICUM.com On Rebranding Finland 360! € featuring Register15 January before save and Building a lasting world In challenging times, you need solid partners and long-term solutions to prepare for the future. Register for MIPIM and: Engage with the industry’s key active players, Identify the right partners to fi nance your projects, Obtain a clear vision of the state of the market, Build strategies and alliances to ensure your company’s steady growth. MIPIM welcomes MIPIM Horizons Reach out to new horizons and expand your business in high-potential regions. MIPIM Horizons will focus on new regional opportunities in the Middle East, North Africa, Turkey, Latin America and Central Asia. Register for MIPIM and benefi t from complimentary access to the MIPIM Horizons exhibition area, conferences and events. EXCLUSIVEIN 2010For more information, please visit www.mipimhorizons.com. For further information, please contact us: Paris (HQ) tel: +33 (0)1 41 90 45 20 London tel: +44 (0) 20 7528 0086 New York tel: +1 (212) 284 5141 www.mipim.com 16-19 March 2010 France, Cannes, Palais des Festivals nordicum_210x277_gb_bis.indd 1 03/11/09 12:08 Corporate Finance Selection of property transactions OCT 2009 SEP 2009 MARAUG 20092008 The best property advisor in finland Euromoney 2006-2008 Liquid Real Estate Awards 7Increased properties
    [Show full text]
  • RING II UTREDNINGSPLAN MELLAN ÅBOLEDEN OCH TAVASTEHUSLEDEN Källstrand
    • Bron som går över Rutiådalen är ca 90 meter lång ETAPPVIS BYGGANDE och höjdläget av Ring II är definierat så, att man på båda sidor om Rutiån kan bygga lättrafikleder ovan- På grund av att projektet omfattar tunnlar och att avstån- för högvattenståndet. den från de planskilda anslutningarna mellan dem är • Tavastehusledens planskilda anslutning planeras korta, bör Ring II från första början utföras som en väg uppta betydligt mindre utrymme än tidigare. med två körbanor. Enligt gällande tunnelbestämmelser och trafikprognoserna för Ring II får dubbelriktad trafik Bullerstörningarna från de ovan jord belägna avsnitten inte förekomma i tunnlarna. Ring II utredningsplan ökar från nuvarande nivå, men de kan dämpas genom mellan Åboleden och att tillämpa de bullerbekämpningslösningar som framförs Det verkar som om Ring II inte kommer att bli verklig- i denna plan. Förutom den östra delen av planeringsob- het inom de närmaste åren. Därför bör man, på grund av Tavastehusleden jektet hamnar endast några enskilda bostadsfastigheter växande lokala trafikproblem och utveckling av markan- på områden där dagsriktvärdet 55 dB överskrids. Även vändningen, bland annat vidta följande byggnadsåtgär- på dessa områden förblir bullernivån under 60 dB. Över- der i projektets terrängkorridor: skridningarna beror i mindre grad på bullret från Ring II, utan främst på bullret från Tavastehusleden och delvis på • Snabbförbättringsåtgärder på Åbovägen vid Ring II:s bullret från Gamla Kårbölevägen. verkningsområde. • Snabbförbättringsåtgärder på Vichtisvägen. Genom projektet minskar trafikutsläppen tack vare två • Snabbförbättringsåtgärder på Tavastehusleden. faktorer. De nya kortare avstånden minskar körprestatio- • Att delvis utföra byggandet av Ringvägen i Trestads- nerna. Å andra sidan minskar en smidigare trafik med knuten på grund av den nya markanvändningen rimliga hastigheter utsläppen och energiförbrukningen.
    [Show full text]
  • Kehä II Välillä Turuntie - Hämeenlinnanväylä
    Kehä II välillä Turuntie - Hämeenlinnanväylä Ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettely (YVA) ja alustava yleissuunnittelu Ympäristövaikutusten arviointiohjelma Espoo Helsinki Vantaa Hankkeesta vastaa Uudenmaan tiepiiri Opastinsilta 12 A, PL 70, 00521 Helsinki, puhelinvaihde 0204 22 151 Yhteyshenkilöt Uudenmaan tiepiirissä: dipl.ins. Ari Puhakka, ari.puhakka@tiehallinto.fi , puh. 0204 22 2930 ympäristövastaava Arto Kärkkäinen, arto.karkkainen@tiehallinto.fi , puh 0204 22 2938 Ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettelyn yhteysviranomainen on Uudenmaan ympäristökeskus Asemapäällikönkatu 14, PL 36, 00521 Helsinki, puhelinvaihde 148 881 Yhteyshenkilö Uudenmaan ympäristökeskuksessa Ylitarkastaja Jorma Jantunen, jorma.jantunen@vyh.fi , puh. 1488 8561 Ylitarkastaja Jukka Peura, jukka.peura@vyh.fi , puh. 1488 8341 Arviointiohjelma on nähtävillä 1.10.-29.11.2001 seuraavissa paikoissa: Tiehallinnon palvelupiste Itä-Pasila, Opastinsilta 12 A, 2. kerros Espoon kaupunkisuunnittelukeskus, Kirkkojärventie 6 B Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluvirasto, Kansakoulukatu 3 Vantaan kaupunki, Maankäyttötoimen asiakaspalvelu, Kielotie 28 Leppävaaran kirjasto, (Espoon pääkirjasto), Vanha maantie 11 Myyrmäen yhteispalvelupiste, Kilterinraitti 6 Myyrmäen kirjasto, Kilterinraitti 6 Malminkartanon kirjasto, Puustellintie 6 Projektin internetsivulla Muistutukset ja huomautukset tästä arviointiselostuksesta osoitetaan kirjallisesti yhteysviranomaiselle nähtävilläoloaikana. Projektilla on internetsivut osoitteessa www.tiehallinto.fi /keha2 ISBN 951-726-810-6 TIEH 1000037-01 Lisätietoja
    [Show full text]
  • – All of Finland Within Your Reach Port of the Entire Finland
    PORT OF HELSINKI – ALL OF FINLAND WITHIN YOUR REACH PORT OF THE ENTIRE FINLAND One of the strengths of the Port of Helsinki is its excellent location The Port of Helsinki promotes well-being in Finland. at the heart of Finnish production, population and consumption. The passengers and cargo travelling through the The passenger harbours in the centre of Finland’s capital are an port have an extensive and positive impact on the essential part of vibrant Helsinki. In addition to the favourable location, the strengths of cargo traffic include frequent liner Helsinki Metropolitan Area’s tourist services, the traffic, balanced import and export as well as a focus on unitised hotel and restaurant business, transport and retail cargo services. as well as employment. In practice, the effects of The Port of Helsinki creates an effective setting for port the port reach across Finland. operations, and an excellent outcome is guaranteed by great partners: shipping companies, harbour operators, transport companies and other professionals in logistics and travel. Port of Helsinki • One of the busiest passenger ports in Europe • Finland’s leading general port for foreign cargo E 12 3 Loviisa Harbour 50 80 km E 75 4 RING III 45 E 18 7 101 E 18 1 RING I Vuosaari Harbour RING II 51 Katajanokka South Harbour West Harbour Hernesaari Each quay of the Port of Helsinki is equipped with a wastewater reception system ffor ship waste waters. THE UNIQUE BALTIC SEA The Port of Helsinki’s operations are based on the company’s values: productivity, responsibility and cooperation. The company’s profitability is further improving the future operating The Port of Helsinki is conditions, and environmentally responsible operations are a priority for this long-standing company.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Helsinki Strategic Spatial Plan
    Helsinki.City.Planning.Department.publications.2009:8 From Helsinki.City.Planning.Department.publications.2009:8 City to City-Region City of Helsinki Strategic Spatial Plan 1 2 From City to City-Region City of Helsinki Strategic Spatial Plan From City to City-Region City of Helsinki Strategic Spatial Plan 1 @ City Planning Department 2009 City of Helsinki Edited by Douglas Gordon, Rikhard Manninen & Olavi Veltheim (note: see Organisation page for all contributors from the original Finnish edition) Design & layout: Douglas Gordon Graphic design: Heikki Jantunen Printing: Edita Prima Oy, 2009, Helsinki ISSN 0787-9024 ISBN 978-952-223-495-7 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-223-496-4 (PDF) 2 CONTENTS From City to City-region: Helsinki Strategic Spatial Plan ................................................................................................... 5 Setting the Vision.............................................................................................................................. 5 Strategic spatial development strategy and the Master Plan......................................................... 6 The Key Strategic Issues .................................................................................................................. 7 Towards a Metropolitan City-region.......................................................................................... 9 Integrating the Metropolitan area as a City-region......................................................................... 9 Key Policies:......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    Social Information to Promote Sustainable Use of Urban Forests Forest Recreation & Tourism Serving Urbanised Societies May 30th, 2008 Maija Sipilä, Liisa Tyrväinen & Johanna Jokinen Finnish Forest Research Institute & Department of Geography, University of Helsinki Metsäntutkimuslaitos Skogsforskningsinstitutet Finnish Forest Research Institute www.metla.fi Social sustainability of using urban forests possibilities to use and enjoy urban nature are important for human health and wellbeing favourite places of residents are more often in nature areas (especially forest areas) than in built-up environments (Tyrväinen et al. 2007) land use and nature management decisions are important in defining these possibilities changing nature areas into built-up areas can permanently restrict the possibilities of future generations to gain health and wellbeing from urban nature lack of long-term thinking in nature management can leave future generations for instance with wide forest areas in need of regeneration at the same time need for well-informed planning decisions what kind of and how managed environment is healthy and positively experienced? how can social aspects of urban nature be considered together with other, such as ecological and economical aspects? 2 Classification of residents 5 great True urbans (5 %) Common urbans (22 %) Urban nature people (8 %) Common nature people (21 %) 1 5 No class (25 %) appeal of city city of appeal True nature people (19 %) small 1 small appeal of nature great (Tyrväinen et al. 2007) 3 Social information
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromatic Pathways of Porphins, Chlorins and Bacteriochlorins¤
    The aromatic pathways of porphins, chlorins and bacteriochlorins¤ JonasJuse lius and Dage Sundholm Department of Chemistry, PO Box 55 (A.I. V irtasen Aukio 1), FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: jonas=iki.Ð, sundholm=chem.helsinki.Ð Received 12th January 2000, Accepted 8th March 2000 Published on the Web 13th April 2000 The aromatic pathways of free-base porphins, chlorins and bacteriochlorins have been studied by calculating the nuclear magnetic shieldings at selected points outside the molecules. The strengths of the induced ring currents for a given magnetic Ðeld have been obtained by using the aromatic ring current shieldings (ARCS) method. We found that pyrrolic rings with an inner hydrogen have a local ring current of the same magnitude as the ring current for the pyrrole molecule. The local ring current for pyrrolic rings without an inner hydrogen is between half and one fourth of the pyrrole value depending on the porphyrin. TheC2H2 units of the pyrrolic rings in free-base porphin have recently been suggested to function as exocyclic bridges, but the present study indicates that this is not the case. The suggested 18p-[16]annulene inner cross aromatic pathway does not exist until all pyrrolic rings are saturated in the b-positions. Free-base trans-porphin was found to have the largest ring-current susceptibility among the molecules studied. Porphyrins for which the aromatic pathway has to pass the nitrogen of a pyrrolic unit with an inner hydrogen have signiÐcantly smaller ring currents than free-base trans-porphin. We also show that the 1H NMR shielding of the inner hydrogens is a sensitive measure of the strength of the ring current for the studied molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles (Coleoptera) in Central Reservations of Three Highway Roads Around the City of Helsinki, Finland
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 42: 615–626 ISSN 0003-455X Helsinki 21 December 2005 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2005 Beetles (Coleoptera) in central reservations of three highway roads around the city of Helsinki, Finland Matti J. Koivula1*, D. Johan Kotze2 & Juha Salokannel3 1) Department of Renewable Resources, 4-42 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2E3, Canada (*e-mail: [email protected]) 2) Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 3) Siikinkatu 13, FI-33710 Tampere, Finland Received 8 Mar. 2005, revised version received 4 May 2005, accepted 4 May 2005 Koivula, M. J., Kotze, D. J. & Salokannel, J. 2005: Beetles (Coleoptera) in central reservations of three highway roads around the city of Helsinki, Finland. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 42: 615–626. Central reservations, also known as median strips, are strips of ground, usually paved or landscaped, that divide the carriageways of a highway. We trapped beetles in veg- etated central reservations of three Ring Roads around the city of Helsinki, Finland, in 2002, and collected a total of 1512 individuals and 110 species. Ground beetles were the most abundant beetle family collected with 749 individuals and 29 species, followed by rove beetles (410 individuals, 31 species) and weevils (131 individu- als, 15 species). Central reservations of the most recently constructed Ring Road II collected significantly more ground-beetle species and rove-beetle individuals than the two older roads (Ring Roads I and III). However, in Ring Road III we collected slightly more weevil individuals, and significantly more individuals of the rest of the beetles.
    [Show full text]