Neighborhoods and Police: the Maintenance of Civil Authority I by Georgel
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National*I~~tituteof Justice May 1989 No. 10 A publication of the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, and the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 1, II 1 Neighborhoods and Police: The Maintenance of Civil Authority I By George L. Kelling and James K. Stewart A cardinal tenet of community policing is that a new relationship between police and neighborhoods is required if This is one in a series of reports originally developed with the quality of residential and commercial life is to be some of the leading figures in American policing during their protected or improved in cities. This assertion raises several periodic meetings at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government. The reports are published so that questions. What are neighborhoods? Do they exist, or are Americans interested in the improvement and the future of they largely a concoction of nostalgic policymakers, police policing can share in the information and perspectives that reformers, and revisionists who perpetuate ideals that may or were part of extensive debates at the School's Executive may not have existed in the past, but certainly are outside of Session on Policing. current urban experience? Assuming that neighborhoods The police chiefs, mayors, scholars, and others invited to the exist, what should their relationship be with police? What meetings have focused on the use and promise of such opportunities are offered both to neighborhoods and to police strategies as community-based and problem-oriented policing. by restructuring their relationship? How should police The testing and adoption of these strategies by some police resolve the potential conflict between the rule of law and agencies signal important changes in the way American policing now does business. What these changes mean for the neighborhood standards of conduct which they might be welfare of citizens and the fulfillment of the police mission in asked to uphold? the next decades has been at the heart of the Kennedy School meetings and this series of papers. This paper addresses these questions by focusing upon three We hope that through these publications police officials and aspects of neighborhoods: (1) the neighborhood as polity; (2) other policymakers who affect the course of policing will the ability of a neighborhood to defend itself against crime debate and challenge their beliefs just as those of us in the and disorder without eliminating civility and justice from Executive Session have done. social relations there; and (3) alternate visions of the role of The Executive Session on Policing has been developed and municipal police in neighborhoods. administered by the Kennedy School's Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management and funded by the National Institute of Justice and private sources that include the Charles Neighborhood as polity Stewart Mott and Guggenheim Foundations. At a minimum, neighborhoods are places in which people James K. Stewart live or work near each other, recognize their recurring Director National Institute of Justice proximity, and signal this recognition to each other.' As U.S. Department of Justice Suttles2notes, residents of cities construct "cognitive maps" in which they allocate distinctive places as "theirs7'-their Mark H. Moore neighborhood. Moreover, neighbors are not just the residents Faculty Chairman of a special geographical area but also include shopkeepers Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management John F. Kennedy School of Government and their employees, other workers who frequent areas Harvard University regularly (postal workers, for example), and even the b h~meless.~ The intensity of neighboring relationships depends on many First, the progressive reform movement that centralized city factors, including geographical and physical characteristics government has contributed to a decline in neighborhood of the community, ethnic and kinship networks, affective influence. As Glazer notes: attachment of residents to the neighborhood, home and All during the twentieth century, indeed until the mid- business ownership, building construction features, local 1960s, proposals for city reform generally followed . facility usage, pedestrian and automotive traffic patterns, the progressive tradition: make the mayor or the board of amount of time neighbors spend in the area, as well as supervisors ~tronger.~ demographic patterns (e.g., the number of children, non- working adults, and aged who live in a community). The The consequence of strengthening centralized city govern- content of neighboring can range from curt nods of the head ment has been the reduction of the political strength and ("good fences make good neighbors") to regularly scheduled capacity for self-help of neighborhoods. neighborhood meetings ("strength through ~nity").~ Second, congruent with the centralization of political power Periodicity characterizes both the intensity and content of were the professionalization and bureaucratization of neighboring. Citizens live in time, as well as area, zones. services, especially social and police services. Problem Periodicity has two sets of implications. solving and the provision of services not only came under the political and administrative control of executives, but also were provided by newly developing bureaucracies with (6.. neighboring can range from curt full-time staff recruited and promoted on the basis of nods of the head ('good fences make good achieved qualifications, professional or otherwi~e.~Within neighborhoods, self-help in many areas, such as education, neighbors') to regular. meetings was eliminated or, in the case of police, denigrated and ('strength through unity'). 9 9 discouraged. Third, during the 1950's and 1960's, urban renewal policies decimated many neighborhoods in the name of eliminating First, many residents abandon their neighborhoods during slums, improving the urban housing stock, and integrating the day: workers may commute to their workplaces and ethnic groups into America's "melting pot." It seems ironic children may be bused to schools outside their immediate that many neighborhood self-help groups organized in neighborhood. Other people use neighborhoods during resistance to the implementation of such policies in their particular times: merchants arrive for the opening of their immediate locales. shops and depart after closing; shoppers arrive and depart; postal workers move through a neighborhood on a relatively predictable schedule. During particular times, the homeless can comprise the residents of a neighborhood. Traffic on 6 6 The consequence of strengthening major thoroughfares ebbs and flows daily. Bars open and centralized city government has been the close. reduction of the political strength and Second, citizen perceptions about areas change depending on capacity for self-help of neighborhoods. 9 9 the time of the day or day of the week. During rush hour while awaiting transportation, citizens can view a neighbor- hood as being theirs, in a sense, and a comfortable place in which to be. The same area at another time of day or week Fourth, low-income housing developments concentrated on (midnight or Saturday) may be perceived as extraordinarily the construction of high-rise apartments rather than on low- alien and threatening. rise or single-dwelling residences. Jane Jacobs and Oscar Newman have written persuasively about the largely Citizen participation in neighborhood activities and govern- negative consequences of such building practices on neigh- ance has long been perceived in this country as central to the borhoods and cities.' formation of an individual's character, the inculcation of traditional values, and the maintenance of freedom. Integral Fifth, transportation policies concentrated on facilitating the parts of this participation have been self-help and self- movement of automobiles into and out of cities, at the governance. Despite this political philosophy, the aim or the expense of the public building, improvement, or even consequence of American urban