The Economic Structures in the Romanian Regions and Counties and the Eu Member States. Comparative Analyses*

THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURES IN THE ROMANIAN REGIONS AND COUNTIES AND THE EU MEMBER STATES. COMPARATIVE ANALYSES* Marioara Iordan1, Mihaela Nona Chilian2, Ion Ghizdeanu3, Dalina Maria Andrei4 Abstract: Bridging the gap between countries, and thus decresing poverty, is the greatest challenge of European countries in the context of the European social cohesion. The risk of future economic difficulties caused by the size of budget deficits is beared by the funds to be allocated to social inclusion in the EU and the EU member countries. They will be concerned in the post-crisis period with aligning the requirements of progress, of poverty reduction, but also of ensuring the sustainability of public finances. For Romania, cohesion is particularly important as most regions show significant differences as compared to the EU average and the national average. This group also includes the South Muntenia Region, which has many advantages for faster progress and to be able to exploit the opportunities offered by the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy. Keywords: regional development, inter-regional economic development gaps, economic and social cohesion, Europe 2020 JEL Classification: O18, R11, R12 Introduction Romania, as well as the European Union, is going through a period of change in the economic and social paradigms. The crisis has wiped out years of economic progress and highlighted many structural weaknesses that caused vulnerability to many European economies. If before the crisis there was much optimism on reducing disparities between countries and, hence, poverty, today the prospects are not so encouraging. The European social cohesion policy is under assessment and conceptual rethinking. Along with general challenges, such as population aging, dysfunction of economic systems and globalization, currently and in the future the restrictions due to the crisis are/will be present. It is increasingly discussed the risk of future economic difficulties due to budget deficits. From the social point of view, this means that the EU and Member States funds for inclusion may diminish. The after-crisis period is characterized by the balance between the practical requirements of progress and poverty reduction and the need to ensure sustainable public finances. In this context, Europe 2020 brings new elements to meet new challenges. This strategy is based also on the benefits from existing coordination within the European Economic Recovery Plan in response to the crisis by addressing key bottlenecks that constrain growth at national and EU level, including those relating to the internal market and infrastructure. Regional policy transposed into the European cohesion policy has a key role in the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy. Regional policy does not only ensure economic and social cohesion, but is designed to facilitate the achievement of employment and social targets set by Europe 2020. Also, it aims at stimulating and diversifying economic activities, stimulating private sector investment to ensure maximum * The paper presents intermediate results of research theme „Coeziunea Economico-socială în România din perspectiva Strategiei Europa 2020”, authors: Iordan Marioara, Ghizdeanu Ion, Chilian Nona Mihaela, Radu Lupu, Andrei Dalina Maria,Tapu Dana and collaborators: Albu Lucian Liviu, Diaconescu Tiberiu, Adriana Grigorescu, 2013 research program, Institute for Economic Forecasting, NIER-"Costin C.Kiriţescu", Romanian Academy. 1 Senior researcher I, Institute for Economic Forecasting, Bucharest, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. 2 Senior researcher III, Institute for Economic Forecasting, Bucharest. 3 Professor, Senior researcher I, Institute for Economic Forecasting, Bucharest. 4 Researcher, Institute for Economic Forecasting, Bucharest. 50 exploitation of local physical and human potential in order to increase the standard of living and reduce disparities to national average and, thereby, to improve convergence in the European Union. For Romania, cohesion policy is particularly important as most regions show significant differences as compared to the EU average and the national average (a category that includes the South Muntenia region, which has important strengths to progress faster and to be able to exploit the opportunities offered by the implementation of Europe 2020). The policy objective most often associated to cohesion is reducing (or, in the worst case, avoidance) of excessive disparities between regions in terms of economic and social development. Conditioned by achieving the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy, in the previous decade a gradual shift from policies aimed to reduce disparities by those which aimed to strengthen national and regional competitiveness was noted, focused on exploiting regional potential to sustain and increase national competitiveness. Feature of regional development policies of the EU Member States in the past decade has been their increasing coverage, while switching to support endogenous development in the regions. Public investment policies to reduce disparities have become more efficient, more focused on the need to ensure real economic growth, but also more related to sectoral policies. In turn, the latter have a significant impact on cohesion, even without explicit goals, such as the policies policies on the development of transport and communications infrastructure, employment, education and research and development, rural development and tourism, etc [1]. This paper summarizes the analysis of development gap of Romania’s regions as compared to the other EU Member States from the point of view of evolution of sectoral economic structures, focusing on the socio-economic status in the South Muntenia Region. 1. Evaluation of economic disparities at regional and sub-regional level in Romania Evaluation of economic and social disparities at regional and subregional levels is relevant for several reasons, among which we can mention: i) the significant inequalities are emprirically found at territorial scale (growth combined with income polarization, the persistence of regional disparities in terms of welfare), ii) the trend towards decentralization and increased role of subnational governments as key players in the development and implementation of policies relating to welfare and economic development, iii) the impact of business and government policy is often evaluated rigorously by reference to the sub-national levels, iv) the importance of the sub-national level from the point of view of policies addressing inequality [2]. Particular attention in studies of determinants of inequalities at sub-national level is paid to the structure of regional/sub-regional economies (assessed through sectoral employment and/or sectoral value added), because it affects their income level and regional distribution, both directly, through occupational structures, earnings and economic multiplier effect, and indirectly, through family structures [3]. In this regard, many empirical studies have revealed, for example, that areas with sustainable manufacturing and a high level of employment in the service sector also enjoy greater economic prosperity, higher household incomes, and lower poverty rates, while the mining and agricultural areas where wages are lower and level of employment is unstable recorded higher rates of poverty. The most common used indicator to assess inter- and intra-regional gaps is the GDP per capita. For countries and regions in Europe the GDP per capita expressed for each country and region considered for analysis in relation to EU28 average revealed both large gaps between regions of the 13 new Member States and the other 15 EU countries, but also large interregional disparities within most EU countries, including some highly developed countries. In Romania, the GDP per capita at standard purchasing power parity in ratio to the EU28 average increased in the period 2000-2010 to 47.0%, with a tendency to stagnation 51 in 2008-2010, due to the global economic crisis. By region, the GDP per capita was only 29.0 % of the EU28 average in 2010 in the North- East Region and 117.0% in 2008 and 111.0% in the years 2009-2010, respectively, in the Bucharest-Ilfov Region (Table 1). Inter-regional inequality rate1 increased between 2001-2008, of pre-accession and post- accession to the EU, from 2.9 to 4.0; however, all the more developed regions were those that have benefited most from this process. It declined during 2009-2010, suggesting that one of the effects of the economic crisis was, in a first stage, the decline in the territorial development gaps due to the greater impact of the crisis in the more developed regions. The inter-county inequality rate2 has steadily increased during 2001-2010, emphasizing growth after 2007, which suggests that developed counties have benefited more from joining the European Union in comparison with less developed ones. Similar situations, of widening disparities between “core” and “periphery” were observed in the rest of the new EU member states, noting that regions adapt differently to a new economic environment and regions that have performed best previously have reinforced positions, while the regions with weaker economic performance remained stationed on the level of slow economic development, at best. Table 1. Evolution of GDP per capita at regional level in Romania (PPS, percentage of EU28 average) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 201 2000 2001 2002 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 Romania 26 28 29 31 34 35 38 41 47 47 47 Macroregion one 25 27 30

Load more