DOCSLIB.ORG

Third Section

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Third Section THIRD SECTION Application no. 40355/11 Leon BOACĂ and others against Romania lodged on 13 June 2011 STATEMENT OF FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants are all Romanian nationals of Roma origin and heirs of Mr Ion Boacă who initiated the domestic proceedings. Those proceedings were still pending when Mr Ion Boacă passed away on 1 April 2010. Mr Ion Boacă’s heirs pursued the case before the domestic courts and lodged a complaint before the Court on his behalf and on their own behalf. The applicants are represented by Romani Criss, a non-governmental organization based in Romania. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. On 30 March 2006 around 5 pm A.N, Mr Ion Boacă’s daughter-in-law, was victim of an aggression in the vicinity of Mr Ion Boacă’s home. Mr Ion Boacă’s three sons (the applicants from nos. 1 – 3 in the annexed list) and the victim’s father went to the Clejani Police Station to report the assault. In front of the Police Station they were allegedly attacked by a group of 50 villagers. When Mr Ion Boacă arrived there, attracted by the noise, he saw C.G.M. injured and his head was covered with blood. His sons’ car was also damaged (the windows were broken and the car’s bonnet was folded up). Mr Ion Boacă also saw that the villagers were chasing his sons and attacking them with stones, bats and bricks. At around 6 pm, the police agents T.B. and M.N. accompanied by the special intervention team (Rapid Intervention Squad, Detaşamentul Poliţiei pentru Intervenţie Rapidă) arrived at Mr Ion Boacă’s home in order to take him into custody. The police intervention team entered the yard and arrrested Mr Ion Boacă. 2 BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants alleged that the special intervention team also called Mr Ion Boacă’s 13-year-old son (M.B.) and daughter-in-law (M.D.) “disgraceful gipsies”, shouted abuse on them and made them lie down so that their faces touched the ground and their arms were behind their backs. Mr Ion Boacă asked T.B. if they had a search warrant, but he pointed to the special squad and told him “They are my search warrant!”. The police agents escorted Mr Ion Boacă, M.B. and M.D. to the Clejani Police Station. According to the applicants, M.B. and M.D had to put their hands and faces to the wall and Mr Ion Boacă was brought into the Chief police’s office at the Clejani Police Station. Later, Mr Ion Boacă’s sons were also brought to the Clejani Police Station. According to the applicants, the police agents assaulted them all the way to the police station, cursed them and called them “miserable and disgraceful gipsies” and shouted abuse on them. Inside the Clejani Police Station they were put in the same office with Mr Ion Boacă. The police agents beat them during interrogation. They kicked Mr Ion Boacă in the ribs, on his right side; they punched them all and beat them with batons in order to make them confess several crimes, including a rape of a foreign woman and theft of some pipes. The police agent T.B. also called the chief of the Letca Noua Police Station and told him to come for “a match with the boys” (la o partidă cu băieții). The police agents beat Mr Ion Boacă and his sons with batons and they kicked them in order to obtain confessions. Mr Ion Boacă fell on the ground. His sons started screaming and told the police officers that he needed medical help. The police agent allowed Mr Ion Boacă to leave but told his sons that they would only be released if they signed the confession which had already been written by the police agents. They did not have the possibility to read the content of the above confession. They signed the confession and were allowed to leave the police station. Mr Ion Boacă was immediately hospitalised at the Bucharest University Hospital until 4 April 2006. He suffered serious traumas caused by the aggression and needed an urgent surgery. On 11 April 2006 a forensic doctor examined him. The medical certificate concluded that he had suffered a thoracic trauma inflicted by a “blow caused by a body or by body impact”. The doctor said that he would need 15 - 19 days to recover. On 1 June 2006 Mr Ion Boacă and his sons lodged a criminal complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office of Giurgiu County, against the police agents who had allegedly ill-treated them. They also complained of discrimination arguing that because of their Roma origin, the police agents had an aggressive attitude towards them. On 18 December 2006 the Giurgiu Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the criminal complaint on the grounds that the police agents’ actions did not disclose any signs of criminal offence. The prosecutor’s decision upheld the Giurgiu Police report and described the villagers’ alleged aggressive behaviour as being “a fight between two Gypsies clans” (scandal între două grupuri de țigani). BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – STATEMENT OF FACTS 3 The applicants appealed against that decision to the hierarchically superior prosecutor. On 29 January 2007 the hierarchically superior prosecutor of the Giurgiu Prosecutor’s Office dismissed their appeal. The applicants challenged that decision before the Giurgiu County Court. On 16 April 2007 the Giurgiu County Court upheld the prosecutor’s decision, considering that the applicants did not prove their allegations. The applicants appealed and on 27 June 2006 the Bucharest Court of Appeal quashed the above mentioned decision and ordered the prosecutor to continue the criminal investigation. It found inter alia that it was undisputed that the applicants had sustained their injuries on 30 March 2006 either at the Police Station or on their way there; however the circumstances needed to be clarified. The court also found that the prosecutor had not taken into account Mr Ion Boacă’s medical certificate, had not heard either the applicants or the eyewitnesses and had not allowed Mr Ion Boacă and his sons to adduce evidence. On 29 August 2007 the Giurgiu Prosecutor’s Office refused to institute criminal proceedings against the police agents. The prosecutor considered that the plaintiffs had not sustained their allegations of ill-treatment and discrimination. It found that the police agents acted lawfully, trying to counter the applicants’ attack by using gas guns and sharp objects. Mr Ion Boacă and his sons appealed against the Giurgiu Prosecutor’s Office decision. On 21 October 2008 the Prosecutor in Chief upheld the above mentioned decision. The applicants challenged those decisions before the Giurgiu County Court. On 3 February 2009 the Giurgiu County Court quashed the decisions of the Giurgiu Prosecutor’s and the Prosecutor in Chief and sent the case back to the prosecutor. The Giurgiu Prosecutor’s Office challenged that decision and on 12 June 2009 the Bucharest Court of Appeal allowed the appeal on points of law in part. It found that the criminal investigation should be continued only regarding Mr Ion Boacă’s injuries. As concerned Mr Ion Boacă’s sons, it considered that the criminal investigation should be closed as they had not endorsed the appeal against the decisions of 29 August 2007 and of 21 October 2008. On 28 October 2009 the Giurgiu Prosecutor’s Office refused to institute criminal proceedings against the police agents on the ground that their actions were according to their professional duties. On 4 December 2009 the Prosecutor in Chief upheld that decision. Mr Ion Boacă appealed against both decisions before the Giurgiu County Court, which on 22 April 2010 dismissed his complaint. The domestic court noted that the prosecutor heard Mr Ion Boacă and four villagers who were in front of the Clejani Police Station and allegedly aggressed Mr Ion Boacă’s sons. The four villagers declared that Mr Ion Boacă had had no injury when he left the Clejani Police station. On 1 April 2010 Mr Ion Boacă died of causes unrelated to the present aggression and his heirs (the applicants) continued the proceedings instituted before the domestic courts. 4 BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – STATEMENT OF FACTS On 14 December 2010 the Bucharest Court of Appeal upheld the decision delivered by the Giurgiu County Court and dismissed the appeal on points of law raised by Mr Ion Boacă’s heirs. B. Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure in force at the time when the facts occurred are detailed in Cobzaru v. Romania (no. 48254/99, § 36, 26 July 2007). COMPLAINTS 1. Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicants complain in their own name and on behalf of Mr Ion Boacă about the fact that on 30 March 2006 Mr Ion Boacă and the first three applicants (see the annexed list from nos. 1 to 3) were subjected to ill-treatment in the Clejani Police Station. 2. The applicants also claim that the ill-treatment suffered by Mr Ion Boacă and the decision not to bring criminal charges against the police agents who had beaten him were predominantly due to his Roma ethnicity, contrary to the principle of non-discrimination set forth in Article 14 of the Convention taken together with Article 3. 3. Invoking Article 6 § 1 of the Convention alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention, the applicants complain in their own name and on behalf of Mr Ion Boacă about the lack of an effective investigation and the unfairness of the criminal proceedings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspectives of the Business Area Development in the Romanian Rural Area
    НАУЧНИ ТРУДОВЕ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ - 2013, том 52, серия 5.1 Perspectives of the business area development in the Romanian rural area. Case study Calarasi county Daniela Cretu1 Elena Lascăr2 Abstract: The rural area in Călăraşi county has a particular importance for the development of the county, so its analysis wants to identify the vital positive and negative elements for its sustainable development. With a decreasing population and its density of about 61 inhabitants/km should be considered mainly a predominant rural county, with over half of the population in rural area in 2012, which represents a much higher value than the average of the recently integrated EU countries. Thus, the rural and agricultural development will form a solid pillar. The success and prosperity of the county depend on their economic performances. The county is dependent on agriculture and on rural economy. The spread of globalization threatens the traditional agriculture. Key words: agriculture, active population, employed population, investments, rural area resources. INTRODUCTION Călăraşi county is part of South-Muntenia development Region, it was declared as territorial-administrative unit in January 1981, it is situated in the South-East part of Romania, on the left shore of the Danube and Borcea Branch and it borders in the North with Ialomiţa county, in the East with Constanţa county, in the West with Giurgiu county and Ilfov Agricultural Sector and in the South with Bulgaria [2]. The county has a surface of 508,785 ha, representing 2.1% of Romania, Călăraşi county occupies 28th place among the country counties [4]. From administrative point of view, the county contains 2 municipalities, 3 towns, 50 communes and 161 villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Unităţilor Scolare Din Judeţul Giurgiu Si Circumscriptiile Arondate
    LISTA UNIT ĂŢ ILOR SCOLARE DIN JUDE ŢUL GIURGIU SI CIRCUMSCRIPTIILE ARONDATE PENTRU RECENSAMANTUL COPIILOR IN VEDEREA INSCRIERII IN CLASA PREGATITOARE/CLASA I Pentru anul şcolar 2012/2013 Nr. Localitatea Denumire scoala Cicumscriptii recensamant crt. Com./ oras 1. Adunatii Sc.I-VIII Ad.Copaceni* Comuna Aduna ţii Cop ăceni, Sat Mogo şeşti Sat Varlaam Copaceni Sc.I-VIII Darasti Sat D ărăş ti, comuna Aduna ţii Cop ăceni, 2. Baneasa Sc.I-VIII Baneasa* Comuna B ăneasa, Sc.I-IV Frasinu Sat Frasinu, comuna B ăneasa, Sc.I-IV Meletie Sat Meletie, comuna B ăneasa, Sc.I-VIII Pietrele Sat Pietrele, comuna B ăneasa, Grad.Sf. Gheorghe Sat Sf. Gheorghe, comuna B ăneasa, Sc.I-IV Baneasa Comuna B ăneasa, 3. Bolintin Sc.I-VIII Bolintin Deal* Comuna Bolintin Deal, Deal Sc.I-VIII Mihai Voda Sat Mihai Vod ă, comuna Bolintin Deal, 4. Bolintin Sc.I-VIII Bolintin Vale* Ora ş Bolintin Vale, Vale Sc.I-VIII Malu Spart Sat Malu Spart, Sc.I-IV Suseni Sat Suseni 5. Buturugeni Sc.I-VIII Buturugeni* Comuna Buturugeni, Sc.I-VIII Padureni Sat P ădureni, comuna Buturugeni, Sc.I-IV Prisiceni Sat Prisiceni, comuna Buturugeni, Sc.I-IV Posta Sat Po şta, comuna Buturugeni, 6. Bucsani Sc.I-VIII Bucsani* Comuna Buc şani, Sc.I-VIII Vadu Lat Sat Vadu Lat, comuna Buc şani, Sc.I-IV Uiesti Sat Uie şti, comuna Buc şani, Sc.I-IV Podisor Sat Podi şor, comuna Buc şani, Sc.I-IV Goleasca Sat Goleasca, comuna Buc şani, 7. Bulbucata Sc.I-VIII Bulbucata* Comuna Bulbucata, 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania - Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review Th 15 Session of the UPR - Human Rights Council
    Romania - Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review th 15 session of the UPR - Human Rights Council Contributed by: El Tera Association Roma Center for Social Intervention and Studies- Romani CRISS Sanse Egale Association Sange Egale pentru Copii si Femei 1 INTRODUCTION Under the universal periodic review, the submitting organizations have used primarily information collected by Romani CRISS, during 2008 until present, since Romania was most recently evaluated under the UPR. Romani CRISS, as well as human rights local monitors’ organizations, are documenting cases in the field cases of violation of human rights of the Roma communities’ members. The current submission will focus on the following areas: right to human dignity; right to life; right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, right not to be discriminated against; freedom of movement and right to leave any country; right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being – with a particular focus on housing and medical care; right to education. The submission will also look at developments since the previous review, particularly normative and institutional framework, for the promotion and protection of human rights. 1. DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE MAY 2008 SESSION Content of recommendation no 6 To continue to respect and promote the human rights of vulnerable groups, including the Roma communities and to continue to take further action to ensure equal enjoyment of human rights by Roma people, as well as to take further appropriate and effective measures to eliminate discrimination against Roma and ensures in particular their access to education, housing, healthcare and employment without discrimination, and gives a follow up to the recommendations of the United Nations human rights bodies in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Performance Green Port Giurgiu
    TEN-T Multi-Annual Programme High-performance Green Port Giurgiu Member States involved: 2012-EU-18089-S Romania Part of Priority Project 18 Implementation schedule Start date: July 2013 End date: August 2015 EU contribution: €326,505 Additional information: Coordinator’s Report of the Priority Project: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/ infrastructure/ten-t-policy/priority- projects/european- coordinators_en.htm European Commission, DG MOVE http://ec.europa.eu/transport/ index_en.html Innovation and Networks Executive This Action addresses Priority Project Nr. 18 “Waterway axis Rhine/Meuse- Agency (INEA) Main-Danube” of the TEN T network. The Action aims at the development https://ec.europa.eu/inea of an eco-efficient Danube engineering and operation port system, in line with the principles of the “Joint Statement on Guiding Principles for Beneficiaries and Implementing Development of Inland Navigation in the Danube River Basin” (ICPDR, bodies: Danube Commission, Sava Commission, 2008). ILR Logistica Romania S.R.L. www.ilr.com.ro The overall objective of the Action is therefore to turn the port of Giurgiu into the first “Green Danube Port” based on integrated energy-efficiency Industrie-Logistik-Linz GmbH & Co KG concepts and comprehensive environmental measures for intermodal ports. www.ill.co.at It will first take stock of the current situation by undertaking a technical and operational analysis, a market analysis and an environmental S.C. Administratia Zonei Libere Giurgiu assessment. Then the Action will develop concepts that will support the S.A introduction of innovative technology in the port through a series of www.zlg.ro studies. The Action will eventually design the new port and define its business model.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Circumscripţii Sanitare Veterinare De Asistenţă
    Circumscripţii Sanitare Veterinare de Asistenţă Date contact medici veterinari Nr CSV Contractant Medic veterinar Date de contact crt 1 Adunatii Copaceni VET CONSULT SRL 2 Colibasi ECO HORTI VET SRL Dr Petre Stelu 0722 526 419 3 Comana VET CONSULT SRL 4 Gostinari ECO HORTI VET SRL 5 Baneasa CMV DUMITRESCU CRISTIAN DAN Dr.Dumitrescu Cristian 0723 688 184 6 Fratesti TOP LEXUS IMPORT EXPORT SRL Dr Capris Vasilica 0728 907 306 7 Bolintin Deal DRASIMAR VET SRL Dr Dragne Vasile 0740 197 762 8 Bolintin Vale 9 Gaiseni CMV DUTESCU MIHAIL Dr Dutescu Mihail 0721 264 218 10 Floresti Stoenesti 11 Bucsani CMV DRAGOICEA GHEORGHE Dr Dragoicea Gheorghe 0721 107 339 12 Bulbucata VSP VET SRL Dr Viespe Constantin 0744 548 061 13 Mihailesti 14 Buturugeni CMV DOGARU MARIUS Dr Dogaru Marius 0723 265 633 15 Gradinari 16 Calugareni CMV IRIMIE GABRIEL Dr Irimie Gabriel 0766 450 187 17 Stoenesti 18 Clejani CMV TUDOR STELICA Dr Tudor Stelica 0723 533 212 19 Crevedia Mare IORDACHE MIHAITA VETERINAR SRL Dr Iordache Mihaita 0727 886 453 20 Marsa AMEDEA ANISIA VET SRL Dr Masalan Catalin 0743 162 642 21 Daia ALPHA VET SRL Dr Tepus Marius 0766 522 339 22 Gogosari 23 Gaujani CMV BURCEA GABRIEL Dr Burcea Gabriel 0723 488 022 24 Ghimpati CMV VASILE CONSTANTIN Dr Vasile Constantin 0722 399 922 25 Schitu 26 Gostinu CMV PATRASCU TEODOR Dr Patrascu Teodor 0722 88 22 44 27 Oinacu 28 Greaca CMV COSTACHE VASILE Dr Costache Vasile 0723 375 278 29 Hotarele 30 Iepuresti ALD MED VET SRL Dr Dan Marin Alexandru 0723 782 176 31 Joita Dr Pana Daniel 0722 400 950 32 Letca Noua CMV TUDOR
    [Show full text]
  • Ioana Giurgiu Cognitive Computing and Industry Solutions IBM Research - Zurich Curriculum Vitae Saumerstr
    Address: AI for Services and Industry Research Ioana Giurgiu Cognitive Computing and Industry Solutions IBM Research - Zurich Curriculum Vitae Saumerstr. 4, CH-8803 Rueschlikon, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Phone: +41 78 748 90 70 March 2019 Nationality: Romanian Permit: B Research Interests I am a research scientist in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. My current research spans over several intersecting AI directions: explainable and robust AI, multi-task learning, anomaly detection and predictive analytics based on multivariate sensor temporal data. In all lines of work, my main focus is on deep learning methods. Depending on the use cases, in addition to a deep knowledge of AI and ML, domain knowledge – such as IT systems management – is essential. I am in the excellent position of having extensive systems and optimization expertise - acquired during my Ph. D. studies -, as well as deep machine learning and AI knowledge from having spent the last 6+ years focusing on this research domain at IBM Research - Zurich. My research work has been put into production and applied to hundreds of IBM customers. Personal page at IBM: https://resedit.watson.ibm.com/researcher/edit.php?person=zurich-IGI Experience Jul 2015 - Present IBM Research Zurich, CH, Research Staff Member / Team Lead in AI/ML Nov 2012 - Jun 2015 IBM Research Zurich, CH, Postdoctoral Researcher in ML Explainability for classification and anomaly detection models with a focus on multivariate time and event series data Deep learning models (AEs, VAEs, LSTMs,
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Dimension of Wheat Production in Romania
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Territorial dimension of wheat production in Romania Zaharia, Marian and Gogonea, Rodica- Manuela and Balacescu, Aniela Facultatea de S, tiint, e Economice, Universitatea Petrol-Gaze din Ploies, ti, Facultatea de Statistică, Cibernetică s, i Informatică Economică, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucures, ti, Universitatea “Constantin Brâncuşi” din Târgu Jiu 19 November 2020 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106301/ MPRA Paper No. 106301, posted 04 Mar 2021 07:58 UTC TERRITORIAL DIMENSION OF WHEAT PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA MARIAN ZAHARIA1, RODICA-MANUELA GOGONEA2, ANIELA BĂLĂCESCU3 Abstract: Romania's significant agricultural productive potential can fully cover domestic demand and can ensure important export deliveries. However, the yield of cereal production is below the European Union average. Of these, an important place is occupied by wheat production. Taking into account these aspects, the paper investigates the potential of wheat production in Romanian counties starting from a set of indicators and using cluster analysis to identify similarities and disparities between counties from this point of view. Through this study we tried to provide answers to the questions: What is the configuration of wheat production yield at the regional level in Romania? What is its evolution over time? The results obtained during the research show that there are disparities in the counties of Romania in terms of the efficiency of wheat production in correlation with the resources used for its production. Keywords: agricultural sector, wheat production, production yield, regional development, Romania JEL classification: C10, C38, O13 INTRODUCTION Balanced territorial development, including the adoption of rural development measures, embodied in national and regional programs to address the needs and challenges facing rural areas, are major objectives pursued by the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union (CAP, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Roma As Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania
    Roma as Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Roderick Charles Lawford DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated, and the thesis has not been edited by a third party beyond what is permitted by Cardiff University’s Policy on the Use of Third Party Editors by Research Degree Students. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… ii To Sue Lawford and In Memory of Marion Ethel Lawford (1924-1977) and Charles Alfred Lawford (1925-2010) iii Table of Contents List of Figures vi List of Plates vii List of Tables ix Conventions x Acknowledgements xii Abstract xiii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 - Theory and Method
    [Show full text]
  • Județul Giurgiu – 26.11.2016
    39DILúDUHMXGHĠ Proces-verbal din data 26.11.2016SULYLQGGHVHPQDUHDSUHúHGLQĠLORUELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORUGHYRWDUH constituite pentru alegerile parlamentare din anul 2016úLDORFĠLLWRULORUDFHVWRUD &LUFXPVFULSĠLD(OHFWRUDOă-XGHĠHDQă1U19 GIURGIU ,QL܊LDOD Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD )XQF܊LD Nume Prenume $GUHVă WDWăOXL ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă6IkQWXO 1 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1 3UH܈HGLQWH TOMA CAMELIA TEODORA T GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Gheorghe ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă6IkQWXO GHEORGHE- 2 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1 /RF܊LLWRU 38ğ$58 M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Gheorghe ROMULUS 3 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 2 *DOHULLOHGHDUWă 3UH܈HGLQWH BREAZU MARIEA V GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 2 *DOHULLOHGHDUWă /RF܊LLWRU &2&2ù ADRIANA C GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU S.C. EUROTEHNOGRUP 5 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 3 3UH܈HGLQWH /$=Ă5 DANA MARIA M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU S.R.L. S.C. EUROTEHNOGRUP 6 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 3 /RF܊LLWRU 67Ă1,&Ă IONICA-CELASELA B GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU S.R.L. 7 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 Liceul "Tudor Vianu" 3UH܈HGLQWH ğ21( ELENA-ALINA P GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 8 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 Liceul "Tudor Vianu" /RF܊LLWRU GRAURE DANIELA N GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă0LUFHD MARIANA- 9 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 5 3UH܈HGLQWH TUDOR N GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU FHO%ăWUkQ MAGDALENA ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă0LUFHD 10 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 5 /RF܊LLWRU CIOCÎLTAN ELENA I GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU FHO%ăWUkQ Liceul Tehnologic Miron 11 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 6 3UH܈HGLQWH DINU AURELIA M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Nicolescu Liceul Tehnologic Miron DRAGOMIRESCU- 12 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 6 /RF܊LLWRU LIZI-ELISABETA M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Nicolescu IAVORNICIUC Cantina Seminarului 13 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 7 Teologic Teoctist Patriarhul 3UH܈HGLQWH FLORESCU CLAUDIA D GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Cantina Seminarului 14 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 7 Teologic Teoctist Patriarhul /RF܊LLWRU ANCU RODICA D GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1/33 39DILúDUHMXGHĠ ,QL܊LDOD Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecthr Boaca and Others V. Romania
    FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 40355/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 12 January 2016 FINAL 12/04/2016 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Boacă and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: András Sajó, President, Vincent A. De Gaetano, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Egidijus Kūris, Iulia Antoanella Motoc, Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 1 December 2015, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 40355/11) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by seven Romanian nationals (“the applicants”), on 13 June 2011. A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2. The applicants were represented by Romani Criss, a non-governmental organisation based in Romania. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms C. Brumar, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. The applicants alleged that I.B. had been a victim of police brutality, that the ensuing investigation was flawed, and that the victim had been discriminated against on the ground of his Roma origin. 4. On 29 January 2013 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Actualizarea Planului Urbanistic General Al Oraşului Bolintin-Vale, Judeţul Giurgiu
    1 ACTUALIZAREA PLANULUI URBANISTIC GENERAL AL ORAŞULUI BOLINTIN-VALE, JUDEŢUL GIURGIU Beneficiar: ORAŞUL BOLINTIN-VALE Proiectant general: S.C. QUATTRO DESIGN S.R.L. Şef proiect: arh. Andrei JELESCU Contract nr. 215 (6300)/21.07.2015 Faza: VI. PLAN URBANISTIC GENERAL – FORMA FINALĂ Denumirea studiului: MEMORIU GENERAL Data: August 2017 Autorii studiului: S.C. QUATTRO DESIGN S.R.L. (proiectant general) arh. Andrei JELESCU arh. Toader POPESCU arh. Irina POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. Şerban POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. urb. Ana Maria PETRESCU urb. Monica PĂTRĂŞCOIU ing. Mariana SOARE (probleme de mediu) ing. Ana Elisabeta DARABAN (probleme de mediu) ing. Sorin BĂNICĂ (identificare şi evaluare de peisaj) ing. Sorin FLORESCU (studiu geotehnic, al condiţiilor geo-constructive şi al riscurilor) ing. Anghel CONSTANTINESCU (studiu hidrotehnic, hidrogeologic şi hidrogeologic) soc. Anca FIERARU (elemente demografice şi sociale) ing. Mariana DOROBANŢU, ing. Adina IOSA, ing. Luiza MINCULESCU, ing. Dinu ZAHARESCU (echipare edilitară) 2 ACTUALIZAREA PLANULUI URBANISTIC GENERAL AL ORAŞULUI BOLINTIN-VALE, JUDEŢUL GIURGIU FOAIE DE SEMNĂTURI ŞI ŞTAMPILE S.C. QUATTRO DESIGN S.R.L. arh. Andrei JELESCU (şef de proiect) arh. Toader POPESCU arh. Irina POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. Şerban POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. urb. Ana Maria PETRESCU urb. Monica PĂTRĂŞCOIU geogr. Mariana SOARE ing. Ana DARABAN ing. Mariana DOROBANŢU ing. Adina IOSA ing. Luiza MINCULESCU 3 ACTUALIZAREA PLANULUI URBANISTIC GENERAL AL ORAŞULUI BOLINTIN-VALE, JUDEŢUL GIURGIU Denumirea şi conţinutul fazelor: I. STUDII DE FUNDAMENTARE a. Studii analitice I.1. Actualizarea suportului topografic şi cadastral I.2. Studiul geotehnic, hidrologic, hidrogeologic, hidrotehnic, al condiţiilor geo-constructive şi al riscurilor naturale I.3. Studiile de echipare edilitară I.4.
    [Show full text]
  • River Restoration Experience in Romania
    RIVER RESTORATION EXPERIENCE IN ROMANIA Elisabeta Cserwid NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT 1 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September BACKGROUND Romania is founding member of ECRR, which was set up in 1999 National Administration “Apele Romane” (ANAR) is member in Board Council of the ECRR Since September 2001, the Romanian Centre of River Restoration (RCRR ) was established through the Order of Ministry of Waters and Environment ( Art.7 in Water Law) 2 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September ACTIVITIES 1999 – first national Workshop regarding “The Ecological River Restoration”, was organized by The National Administration “Romanian Waters” and National Institute of Environmental Research in Bucharest; 1999 – Board Meeting of ECRR was held in Bucharest; 2000 – The Training Course on ”River Restoration” organized by the National Administration “Romanian Waters” together with the Romanian Centre for River Restoration (RCRR) in co- operation with experts from RIZA – The Netherlands and WWF- Germany took place in Bucharest 3 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September ACTIVITIES 2003 -Interministerial Committee Work Meeting on Green Corridor of Lower Danube under the presidency of State Secretary in Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection and President of Romanian Centre for River Restoration was held in Bucharest 2010 - “National River Restoration Centres/ Networks” - Seminar organized by ECRR and ANAR in Bucharest 4 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September LEGAL FRAMEWORK The framework of river restoration topic in Romania is represented by: Water Law 107/1996 with modifications and completions; Ministerial Order 1215/2008 . 5 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED 1998 – Restoration of Babina and Cernovca islands within Green Corridor Project ( INCDD – Tulcea); 2002 Restoration of Comana Wetland – Pr.
    [Show full text]