DOCSLIB.ORG

Euroregion Ruse-Giurgiu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Euroregion Ruse-Giurgiu EUROREGION RUSE-GIURGIU OPERATIONS INTEGRATED OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT THROUGH MASTER-PLANNING PROCEDURE NUMBER: 2(2I)-3.1-20/007 BY PAN PLAN-LASSY-BULPLAN CONSORTIUM www.cbcromaniabulgaria.eu Investing in your future! Romania-Bulgaria Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2007-2013 is co-financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund Table of Contents Preliminary notes.................................................................................................................... 11 Declarations ........................................................................................................................... 11 Master-Plan Part 1 ......................................................................................................... 13 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 14 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Structure of ERGO Master-Plan .................................................................................... 16 1.3 Basic considerations ..................................................................................................... 18 1.3.1 Why cross-border planning? ........................................................................................................... 18 1.3.2 The Danube: connection or division line? ....................................................................................... 18 1.3.3 Co-operation versus competition? .................................................................................................. 18 1.4 European Union and International Relations ................................................................ 20 1.4.1 European Union Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) ............................................................. 20 1.4.2 EC Transport Corridors .................................................................................................................... 21 1.4.3 Main nodes / Metropolitan Areas ................................................................................................... 22 1.5 Methodology ............................................................................................................... 24 1.6 Consortium .................................................................................................................. 26 1.6.1 Consortium experience ................................................................................................................... 26 1.6.2 Structure of Consortium .................................................................................................................. 28 1.6.3 Experts Team ................................................................................................................................... 29 2 Analytical section ..................................................................................................... 31 2.1 The European Context for the Preparation of the Master Plan ...................................... 32 2.2 The Vision for the Ruse-Giurgiu Euroregion Development ............................................. 36 2.3 Geographic parameters and natural resources .............................................................. 39 2.4 Economic infrastructure ............................................................................................... 40 2.4.1 Industry ............................................................................................................................................ 40 2.4.2 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................... 41 2.4.3 Transport ......................................................................................................................................... 41 2.4.4 Tourism ............................................................................................................................................ 41 2.5 Technical infrastructure ............................................................................................... 42 2.5.1 Transport network and communication infrastructure................................................................... 42 2.6 Other Technical Infrastructure...................................................................................... 49 2.6.1 Gas supply ........................................................................................................................................ 49 2.6.2 Heat supply ...................................................................................................................................... 49 Euroregion Ruse-Giurgiu Operations ERGO Master-Plan 2 www.cbcromaniabulgaria.eu Investing in your future! Romania-Bulgaria Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2007-2013 is co-financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund 2.6.3 Water and sewer ............................................................................................................................. 49 2.6.4 Electrical power supply .................................................................................................................... 51 2.6.5 Telecommunications ....................................................................................................................... 51 2.7 Social infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 53 2.7.1 Human resources ............................................................................................................................. 53 2.7.2 Healthcare ....................................................................................................................................... 54 2.7.3 Education ......................................................................................................................................... 54 2.7.4 Social activities and social support .................................................................................................. 54 2.7.5 Culture and cultural institutions ...................................................................................................... 55 2.7.6 Sports ............................................................................................................................................... 55 2.8 Real estates ................................................................................................................. 57 2.9 Cultural and Historical Heritage .................................................................................... 59 2.10 Environment ................................................................................................................ 62 3 Development Vision .................................................................................................. 64 3.1 General Orientation ..................................................................................................... 64 3.2 General Aims & Rules ................................................................................................... 66 3.3 Branding ...................................................................................................................... 68 3.4 Fields of Intervention ................................................................................................... 69 3.5 Economic Sectors ......................................................................................................... 70 3.5.1 Industrial Sector............................................................................................................................... 70 3.5.2 Service Sector .................................................................................................................................. 71 3.5.3 Trade Sector .................................................................................................................................... 71 3.5.4 Tourism Sector ................................................................................................................................. 71 3.5.5 Agricultural Sector ........................................................................................................................... 72 3.6 Economic Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 72 3.7 Technical Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 73 3.7.1 Transport ......................................................................................................................................... 73 3.7.2 Energy .............................................................................................................................................. 77 3.7.3 Water ............................................................................................................................................... 78 3.7.4 Waste ............................................................................................................................................... 78 3.7.5 (Tele-) Communication .................................................................................................................... 79 3.8 Social
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High-Performance Green Port Giurgiu
    TEN-T Multi-Annual Programme High-performance Green Port Giurgiu Member States involved: 2012-EU-18089-S Romania Part of Priority Project 18 Implementation schedule Start date: July 2013 End date: August 2015 EU contribution: €326,505 Additional information: Coordinator’s Report of the Priority Project: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/ infrastructure/ten-t-policy/priority- projects/european- coordinators_en.htm European Commission, DG MOVE http://ec.europa.eu/transport/ index_en.html Innovation and Networks Executive This Action addresses Priority Project Nr. 18 “Waterway axis Rhine/Meuse- Agency (INEA) Main-Danube” of the TEN T network. The Action aims at the development https://ec.europa.eu/inea of an eco-efficient Danube engineering and operation port system, in line with the principles of the “Joint Statement on Guiding Principles for Beneficiaries and Implementing Development of Inland Navigation in the Danube River Basin” (ICPDR, bodies: Danube Commission, Sava Commission, 2008). ILR Logistica Romania S.R.L. www.ilr.com.ro The overall objective of the Action is therefore to turn the port of Giurgiu into the first “Green Danube Port” based on integrated energy-efficiency Industrie-Logistik-Linz GmbH & Co KG concepts and comprehensive environmental measures for intermodal ports. www.ill.co.at It will first take stock of the current situation by undertaking a technical and operational analysis, a market analysis and an environmental S.C. Administratia Zonei Libere Giurgiu assessment. Then the Action will develop concepts that will support the S.A introduction of innovative technology in the port through a series of www.zlg.ro studies. The Action will eventually design the new port and define its business model.
    [Show full text]
  • Ioana Giurgiu Cognitive Computing and Industry Solutions IBM Research - Zurich Curriculum Vitae Saumerstr
    Address: AI for Services and Industry Research Ioana Giurgiu Cognitive Computing and Industry Solutions IBM Research - Zurich Curriculum Vitae Saumerstr. 4, CH-8803 Rueschlikon, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Phone: +41 78 748 90 70 March 2019 Nationality: Romanian Permit: B Research Interests I am a research scientist in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. My current research spans over several intersecting AI directions: explainable and robust AI, multi-task learning, anomaly detection and predictive analytics based on multivariate sensor temporal data. In all lines of work, my main focus is on deep learning methods. Depending on the use cases, in addition to a deep knowledge of AI and ML, domain knowledge – such as IT systems management – is essential. I am in the excellent position of having extensive systems and optimization expertise - acquired during my Ph. D. studies -, as well as deep machine learning and AI knowledge from having spent the last 6+ years focusing on this research domain at IBM Research - Zurich. My research work has been put into production and applied to hundreds of IBM customers. Personal page at IBM: https://resedit.watson.ibm.com/researcher/edit.php?person=zurich-IGI Experience Jul 2015 - Present IBM Research Zurich, CH, Research Staff Member / Team Lead in AI/ML Nov 2012 - Jun 2015 IBM Research Zurich, CH, Postdoctoral Researcher in ML Explainability for classification and anomaly detection models with a focus on multivariate time and event series data Deep learning models (AEs, VAEs, LSTMs,
    [Show full text]
  • Roma As Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania
    Roma as Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Roderick Charles Lawford DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated, and the thesis has not been edited by a third party beyond what is permitted by Cardiff University’s Policy on the Use of Third Party Editors by Research Degree Students. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… ii To Sue Lawford and In Memory of Marion Ethel Lawford (1924-1977) and Charles Alfred Lawford (1925-2010) iii Table of Contents List of Figures vi List of Plates vii List of Tables ix Conventions x Acknowledgements xii Abstract xiii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 - Theory and Method
    [Show full text]
  • Județul Giurgiu – 26.11.2016
    39DILúDUHMXGHĠ Proces-verbal din data 26.11.2016SULYLQGGHVHPQDUHDSUHúHGLQĠLORUELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORUGHYRWDUH constituite pentru alegerile parlamentare din anul 2016úLDORFĠLLWRULORUDFHVWRUD &LUFXPVFULSĠLD(OHFWRUDOă-XGHĠHDQă1U19 GIURGIU ,QL܊LDOD Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD )XQF܊LD Nume Prenume $GUHVă WDWăOXL ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă6IkQWXO 1 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1 3UH܈HGLQWH TOMA CAMELIA TEODORA T GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Gheorghe ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă6IkQWXO GHEORGHE- 2 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1 /RF܊LLWRU 38ğ$58 M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Gheorghe ROMULUS 3 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 2 *DOHULLOHGHDUWă 3UH܈HGLQWH BREAZU MARIEA V GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 2 *DOHULLOHGHDUWă /RF܊LLWRU &2&2ù ADRIANA C GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU S.C. EUROTEHNOGRUP 5 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 3 3UH܈HGLQWH /$=Ă5 DANA MARIA M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU S.R.L. S.C. EUROTEHNOGRUP 6 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 3 /RF܊LLWRU 67Ă1,&Ă IONICA-CELASELA B GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU S.R.L. 7 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 Liceul "Tudor Vianu" 3UH܈HGLQWH ğ21( ELENA-ALINA P GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 8 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 Liceul "Tudor Vianu" /RF܊LLWRU GRAURE DANIELA N GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă0LUFHD MARIANA- 9 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 5 3UH܈HGLQWH TUDOR N GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU FHO%ăWUkQ MAGDALENA ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă0LUFHD 10 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 5 /RF܊LLWRU CIOCÎLTAN ELENA I GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU FHO%ăWUkQ Liceul Tehnologic Miron 11 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 6 3UH܈HGLQWH DINU AURELIA M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Nicolescu Liceul Tehnologic Miron DRAGOMIRESCU- 12 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 6 /RF܊LLWRU LIZI-ELISABETA M GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Nicolescu IAVORNICIUC Cantina Seminarului 13 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 7 Teologic Teoctist Patriarhul 3UH܈HGLQWH FLORESCU CLAUDIA D GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU Cantina Seminarului 14 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 7 Teologic Teoctist Patriarhul /RF܊LLWRU ANCU RODICA D GIURGIU, MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1/33 39DILúDUHMXGHĠ ,QL܊LDOD Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecthr Boaca and Others V. Romania
    FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 40355/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 12 January 2016 FINAL 12/04/2016 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Boacă and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: András Sajó, President, Vincent A. De Gaetano, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Egidijus Kūris, Iulia Antoanella Motoc, Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 1 December 2015, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 40355/11) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by seven Romanian nationals (“the applicants”), on 13 June 2011. A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2. The applicants were represented by Romani Criss, a non-governmental organisation based in Romania. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms C. Brumar, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. The applicants alleged that I.B. had been a victim of police brutality, that the ensuing investigation was flawed, and that the victim had been discriminated against on the ground of his Roma origin. 4. On 29 January 2013 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Actualizarea Planului Urbanistic General Al Oraşului Bolintin-Vale, Judeţul Giurgiu
    1 ACTUALIZAREA PLANULUI URBANISTIC GENERAL AL ORAŞULUI BOLINTIN-VALE, JUDEŢUL GIURGIU Beneficiar: ORAŞUL BOLINTIN-VALE Proiectant general: S.C. QUATTRO DESIGN S.R.L. Şef proiect: arh. Andrei JELESCU Contract nr. 215 (6300)/21.07.2015 Faza: VI. PLAN URBANISTIC GENERAL – FORMA FINALĂ Denumirea studiului: MEMORIU GENERAL Data: August 2017 Autorii studiului: S.C. QUATTRO DESIGN S.R.L. (proiectant general) arh. Andrei JELESCU arh. Toader POPESCU arh. Irina POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. Şerban POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. urb. Ana Maria PETRESCU urb. Monica PĂTRĂŞCOIU ing. Mariana SOARE (probleme de mediu) ing. Ana Elisabeta DARABAN (probleme de mediu) ing. Sorin BĂNICĂ (identificare şi evaluare de peisaj) ing. Sorin FLORESCU (studiu geotehnic, al condiţiilor geo-constructive şi al riscurilor) ing. Anghel CONSTANTINESCU (studiu hidrotehnic, hidrogeologic şi hidrogeologic) soc. Anca FIERARU (elemente demografice şi sociale) ing. Mariana DOROBANŢU, ing. Adina IOSA, ing. Luiza MINCULESCU, ing. Dinu ZAHARESCU (echipare edilitară) 2 ACTUALIZAREA PLANULUI URBANISTIC GENERAL AL ORAŞULUI BOLINTIN-VALE, JUDEŢUL GIURGIU FOAIE DE SEMNĂTURI ŞI ŞTAMPILE S.C. QUATTRO DESIGN S.R.L. arh. Andrei JELESCU (şef de proiect) arh. Toader POPESCU arh. Irina POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. Şerban POPESCU-CRIVEANU arh. urb. Ana Maria PETRESCU urb. Monica PĂTRĂŞCOIU geogr. Mariana SOARE ing. Ana DARABAN ing. Mariana DOROBANŢU ing. Adina IOSA ing. Luiza MINCULESCU 3 ACTUALIZAREA PLANULUI URBANISTIC GENERAL AL ORAŞULUI BOLINTIN-VALE, JUDEŢUL GIURGIU Denumirea şi conţinutul fazelor: I. STUDII DE FUNDAMENTARE a. Studii analitice I.1. Actualizarea suportului topografic şi cadastral I.2. Studiul geotehnic, hidrologic, hidrogeologic, hidrotehnic, al condiţiilor geo-constructive şi al riscurilor naturale I.3. Studiile de echipare edilitară I.4.
    [Show full text]
  • “Perverting the Taste of the People”: Lăutari and the Balkan Question in Romania ______
    DOI https://doi.org/10.2298/MUZ2029085L UDC 784.4(=214.58)(498) “Perverting the Taste of the People”: Lăutari and the Balkan Question in Romania ___________________________ Roderick Charles Lawford1 Cardiff University, United Kingdom „Извитоперење укуса људи“: Lăutari и балканско питање у Румунији __________________________ Родерик Чарлс Лофорд Универзитет у Кардифу, Уједињено Краљевство Received: 1 September 2020 Accepted: 9 November 2020 Original scientific article. Abstract “’Perverting the Taste of the People’: Lăutari and the Balkan Question in Ro- mania” considers the term “Balkan” in the context of Romanian Romani mu- sic-making. The expression can be used pejoratively to describe something “bar- baric” or fractured. In the “world music” era, “gypsy-inspired” music from the Balkans has become highly regarded. From this perspective “Balkan” is seen as something desirable. The article uses the case of the Romanian “gypsy” band Taraf de Haïdouks in illustration. Romania’s cultural and physical position with- in Europe can be difficult to locate, a discourse reflected in Romanian society itself, where many reject the description of Romania as a “Balkan” country. This conflict has been contested throughmanele , a Romanian popular musical genre. In contrast, manele is seen by its detractors as too “eastern” in character, an unwel- come reminder of earlier Balkan and Ottoman influences on Romanian culture. Keywords: Balkan(s), Romania, alterity, exotic, oriental, Ottoman, manele, lăutari, “gypsy”, Turkish, Roma, Romani, “world music”, subaltern. 1 [email protected] 86 МУЗИКОЛОГИЈА / MUSICOLOGY 29-2020 Апстракт „’Извитоперење укуса људи’: Lăutari и балканско питање у Румунији“ студија је у којој се разматра појам „Балкан“ у контексту музичке продукције румунских Рома.
    [Show full text]
  • New Results for Maize Crops Cultivated in the No- Tillage System at the “Ramira” Agricultural Company from Mârşa, Giurgiu County N
    Scientific Papers, UASVM Bucharest, Series A, Vol. LIII, 2010, ISSN 1222-5339 NEW RESULTS FOR MAIZE CROPS CULTIVATED IN THE NO- TILLAGE SYSTEM AT THE “RAMIRA” AGRICULTURAL COMPANY FROM MÂRŞA, GIURGIU COUNTY N. ŞARPE*, I. IONIŢĂ**, ELENA EREMIA**, M. MASCHIO*** *Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences **“Ramira” Agricultural Company, Giurgiu County ***Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Timişoara Keywords: Ramira, conventional, no-tillage, Gaspardo, Regina model Abstract In Romania, maize is the main cultivated plan and maize crops are extremely important from an economic point of view. Research with the no-tillage system applied to maize crops were made in the Romanian Plain, Şarpe (1968, 1987, 2000, 2008, 2009), in Banat, Motiu (2004) and in the Flood Plain of the Danube River, Şarpe (2004, 2005, 2007, 2008). The results obtained in Romania confirm the results of the research made in other countries: Philips and Young (1973), Köller (1999), Derpsch (2001). “Ramira” is the first agricultural company from Giurgiu County which in 2009 cultivated maize in the no-tillage system on a 200 hectares area of land, the results obtained being quite remarkable. In the conventional system, under the weather conditions of the year 2009, the grain yield recorded from the maize crops amounted to 7,200 kg/ha, while in the no-tillage system a grain yield of 7,500 kg/ha was recorded - so the yields obtained in the technological systems were practically equal. However, there were small differences in terms of fuel consumption. For example, in the no-tillage system, a 78 litres/ha fuel consumption was recorded, while in the no-tillage system this amounted to only 25 litres/ha.
    [Show full text]
  • 021.310.13.86 E-Mail
    39DILúDUHMXGHĠ Proces-verbal din data de 16.11.2020SULYLQGGHVHPQDUHDSUHúHGLQĠLORUELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORUGHYRWDUH FRQVWLWXLWHSHQWUXDOHJHUHD6HQDWXOXL܈LD&DPHUHL'HSXWD܊LORUGLQ6 decembrie 2020úLDORFĠLLWRULORUDFHVWRUD %LURXO(OHFWRUDOGH&LUFXPVFULS܊LHQU19 GIURGIU ,QL܊LDOD Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD )XQF܊LD Nume Prenume $GUHVă WDWăOXL ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă6IkQWXO -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 1 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1 3UH܈HGLQWH 67Ă1,&Ă PETRONELA F Gheorghe GIURGIU ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă6IkQWXO GHEORGHE- -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 2 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 1 /RF܊LLWRU 38ğ$58 M Gheorghe ROMULUS GIURGIU -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 3 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 2 *DOHULLOHGHDUWă 3UH܈HGLQWH BREAZU MARIEA V GIURGIU -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 4 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 2 *DOHULLOHGHDUWă /RF܊LLWRU GROZEA MIHAELA-SIMONA M GIURGIU 3ULPăULD0XQLFLSLXOXL -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 5 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 3 3UH܈HGLQWH TUDOR OANA-RALU G Giurgiu GIURGIU 3ULPăULD0XQLFLSLXOXL -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 6 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 3 /RF܊LLWRU VULCAN JENI-RAMONA I Giurgiu GIURGIU -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 7 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 Liceul ´Tudor Vianu´ 3UH܈HGLQWH MODORAN 7(2'253(75,܇25 M GIURGIU -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 8 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 4 Liceul ´Tudor Vianu´ /RF܊LLWRU GRAURE DANIELA N GIURGIU ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă0LUFHD MARIANA- -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 9 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 5 3UH܈HGLQWH TUDOR N FHO%ăWUkQ MAGDALENA GIURGIU ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă0LUFHD -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 10 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU 5 /RF܊LLWRU SALTELECHI GIORGIANA A FHO%ăWUkQ GIURGIU Liceul Tehnologic Miron -8'(ğ8/*,85*,8081,&,3,8/ 11 MUNICIPIUL GIURGIU
    [Show full text]
  • LISTA MONUMENTELOR ISTORICE 2015 - Județul Giurgiu
    MINISTERUL CULTURII LISTA MONUMENTELOR ISTORICE 2015 - Județul Giurgiu - Nr. crt. Cod LMI Denumire Localitate Adresă Datare MONITORULOFICIAL AL ROMÂNIEI, PARTEAI, Nr. 113 bis/15.II.2016 1 GR-I-s-A-14756 Cetatea Giurgiu municipiul GIURGIU Pe malul stâng al Braţului Sf. sec. XIV - XVIII, Epoca Gheorghe, la V de Şoseaua Portului medievală 2 GR-I-s-A-14757 Situl arheologic de la municipiul GIURGIU "Malu Roşu”, la cca. 1 km NE de Vama Giurgiu, punct "Malu Giurgiu Roşu" 3 GR-I-m-A-14757.01 Aşezare municipiul GIURGIU "Malu Roşu”, la cca. 1 km NE de Vama Paleolitic superior Giurgiu 4 GR-I-m-A-14757.02 Aşezare municipiul GIURGIU "Malu Roşu”, la cca. 1 km NE de Vama Paleolitic inferior Giurgiu 5 GR-I-s-B-14758 Situl arheologic de la sat ADUNAŢII COPĂCENI; "Dăneasca”, în partea de N a satului Adunaţii Copăceni, punct comuna ADUNAŢII "Dăneasca” COPĂCENI 6 GR-I-m-B-14758.01 Aşezare sat ADUNAŢII COPĂCENI; "Dăneasca”, în partea de N a satului Epoca medievală comuna ADUNAŢII COPĂCENI 7 GR-I-m-B-14758.02 Aşezare sat ADUNAŢII COPĂCENI; "Dăneasca”, în partea de N a satului Latène, Cultura geto- comuna ADUNAŢII dacică COPĂCENI 8 GR-I-m-B-14758.03 Aşezare sat ADUNAŢII COPĂCENI; "Dăneasca”, în partea de N a satului Epoca bronzului, comuna ADUNAŢII Cultura Glina; Tei, faza COPĂCENI IV INSTITUTUL NAŢIONAL AL PATRIMONIULUI 1393 MINISTERUL CULTURII Nr. crt. Cod LMI Denumire Localitate Adresă Datare 9 GR-I-s-B-14759 Aşezare sat BĂNEASA; comuna "Dealul lui Coadă”, la cca. 0,5 km E de Epoca fierului BĂNEASA sat 10 GR-I-s-B-14760 Situl arheologic de la Bila, sat BILA; comuna SCHITU "La Fântână", la cca.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruse and Giurgiu County Council
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of Ruse-Giurgiu Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Cross-border cooperation development .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Cross-border cooperation between Bulgaria and Romania - Ruse district and Giurgiu County ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 17 3.1 Ruse District and Giurgiu County - geographical confines ......................................... 17 3.2 Ruse District and Giurgiu County as part of the Romania - Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Program ................................................................................................... 22 4. CBC Bulgaria and Romania - good practices ....................................................................... 26 4.1 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 1: ‘’Accessibility‘’ .............................. 26 4.2 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 2: ‘’Environment‘’ ............................. 30 4.3 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 3: ‘’Economic and Social Development‘’ .............................................................................................................. 37 4.4 Best practices
    [Show full text]
  • Comuna Roata De Jos Targ Comunal
    THAD=C MEMORIU DE PREZENTARE I. DENUMIREA PROIE CTULUI: AM ENAJARE TARG COMIJNAL ROATA DE JOS, JUDETUL GIURGIU. II. TITULAR : - PRIMARIA Comunei Roata de Jos, Judetul GIURGIU Strada Republicii 65, Roata de Jos, judetul Giurgiu, telefon: 0246-266103, fax: 0346-815928 III. DESCRIEREA CARACTERISTICILOR FIZICE ALE iNTREGULUI PROIECT: a) Un rezumat al prc iectului; DESCRIEREA LUCRARILOR PROPUSE: Elemente caracteristice ale drumurilor Suprafata totals a plalformei amenajate = 4430mpm Latimea caii de accea este de 5 metri iar pe partea stanga si pe partea dreapta a caii de acces se vor amenaja parcari cu latime de 3m si lungime de 5m. Traseul in plan S Platforma targului propusa spre amenajare a fost proiectata cu o banda de circulatie cu perte carosabila de 5m. In partea stanga si in partea dreapta a caii de rulare se vor amenaja percari la 90gr cu lungime de 5.00m si latime de 3.00m. Acc:esul la amplasament se va face din drumul judetean 601 (DJ601) in apropierea drumului judetean 611 (0J611) si din drumul judetean 601 (DJ601) in partea de jos a arnplasamentului, conform planului de situatie anexat. In etapa 2 de dezvoltare a acestui amplasament se vor executa urmatoarele: • forare put pentru alimentarea complexului cu apa • amplsarea pubelelcr de colectare deseuri • amplasarea pichet mijloace de prim ajutor PSI • accesul pietonal prin trepte de beton cu mana curenta din drumul judetean 611 THADEC erg 1.'eflog (DJ611). Profilul longitudinal Pentru proiectarea p ofilului longitudinal s-a urmarit ca linia rosie sa fie la o cota ac:eptabila fata de linia terenului existent astfel incat diferentele dintre cele doua sa nu determine volume de terasamente mad, exproprieri, lucrari de consolidare sau probleme cu scurgerea si evacuarea apelor.
    [Show full text]