DOCSLIB.ORG

Consiliul Județean Giurgiu Registru Proiecte De

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consiliul Județean Giurgiu Registru Proiecte De CONSILIUL JUDEȚEAN GIURGIU REGISTRU PROIECTE DE HOTĂRÂRI -COMISIA NR. 1: ECONOMICĂ, DEZVOLTARE REGIONALĂ ȘI INTEGRARE EUROPEANĂ -COMISIA NR. 2: PENTRU ÎNVĂȚĂMÂNT, SĂNĂTATE, CULTURĂ, PROTECȚIE SOCIALĂ -COMISIA NR. 3: PENTRU AMENAJAREA TERITORIULUI, Nr. 1/2020 URBANISM, INVESTIȚII -COMISIA NR. 4: JURIDICĂ, APĂRAREA ORDINEI PUBLICE ȘI EGALITĂȚII DE ȘANSE F – PG.15.01 Număr Dată Obiect Inițiator Referat de aprobare Raport de specialitate Avize Stadiul proiectului de curent hotărâre Număr Dată Emitent Număr / Dată Adoptat Respins Privind acoperirea definitivă din 1. 13.01.2020 excedentul bugetului local a deficitului Președinte 297 10.01.2020 Direcția economică 298/10.01.2020 Comisia nr. 1 Da secțiunii de dezvoltare pe anul 2019 Privind aprobarea bugetului propriu de Direcția economică 579/17.01.2020 Comisia nr. 1 venituri şi cheltuieli al judeţului 2. 17.01.2020 Giurgiu, și a bugetului de venituri şi Președinte 578 17.01.2020 Diecția achiziții Da cheltuieli al instituţiilor publice publice și investiții 545/17.01.2020 Comisia nr. 3 finanţate integral sau parţial din venituri în infrastructura proprii și subvenții, pe anul 2020 locală Pentru modificarea Anexei la Hotărârea Comisia nr. 1 nr.141 din 25 octombrie 2019 a Direcția logistică, 853/23.01.2020 Consiliului Județean Giurgiu privind Președinte 852 23.01.2020 managementul Da 3. 23.01.2020 completarea inventarului bunurilor care spitalelor și Comisia nr. 4 aparțin domeniului public al Județului patrimoniu Giurgiu pentru drumul județean DJ 505 și obiectivele aferente acestuia (poduri- podețe) Privind repartizarea pe unități administrativ-teritoriale a fondului constituit la dispoziția Consiliului Județean, conform prevederilor Legii Președinte 1006 28.01.2020 Direcția economică 1007/28.01.2020 Comisia nr. 1 Da 4. 28.01.2020 bugetului de stat pe anul 2020, nr.5/2020, art.6 alin.(6) și repartizarea pe unități administrativ-teritoriale a sumelor defalcate din unele venituri ale bugetului de stat pentru echilibrarea bugetelor locale, conform art.33 alin.(3) lit.b) din Legea nr.273/2006, estimări 2021-2023 Privind constatarea încetării de drept 5. 28.01.2020 înainte de expirarea duratei normale a Președinte 1008 28.01.2020 Secretarul general al 67/06.01.2020 Comisia nr. 4 Da mandatului a calității de consilier județului județean a domnului Vasile Mustățea și vacantarea locului de consilier județean ocupat de acesta Privind trecerea din domeniul public în domeniul privat al Județului Giurgiu a Comisia nr. 1 construcției C2 – garaj, situată în Direcția logistică, 6. 30.01.2020 Municipiul Giurgiu, Str. Baciului, nr.26 Președinte 1164 30.01.2020 managementul 1165/30.01.2020 Comisia nr. 2 Da aflată în administrarea Direcției spitalelor și Generale de Asistență Socială și patrimoniu Comisia nr. 4 Protecția Copilului Giurgiu, în scopul desființării” F – PG.15.01 Privind aprobarea actualizării indicatorilor tehnico-economici la faza Diecția achiziții Comisia nr. 1 7. 03.02.2020 D.A.L.I. pentru obiectivul de investiții Președinte 1293 03.02.2020 publice și investiții 1294/03.02.2020 Da „Reabilitare DJ 401A Bolintin Vale– în infrastructura Comisia nr. 3 Palanca, km 46+765 – km 50+000; locală 3,235 km” Privind aprobarea revizuirii documentației tehnico-economice la Diecția achiziții Comisia nr. 1 8. 03.02.2020 faza P.T. pentru obiectivul de investiții Președinte 1295 03.02.2020 publice și investiții 1296/03.02.2020 Da „Reabilitare DJ 401A Bolintin Vale– în infrastructura Comisia nr. 3 Palanca, km 46+765 – km 50+000; locală 3,235 km” Marian Mina Andrei Mircea Privind eliberarea d-lui Vasile Bardan Daniela Andronache din funcția de Cristescu Dan Direcția Juridică și 9. 13.02.2020 vicepreședinte al Consiliului Județean Delea Mirela 1815 13.02.2020 Administrație 1816/13.02.2020 Comisia nr. 4 Da Giurgiu Dobre Aurelia Publică Geantă Ionel Preda Ionel Simion Cosmin Ștenghel Cristian Dumitrache Silvian Privind alegerea în funcția de Direcția Juridică și 10. 13.02.2020 vicepreședinte al Consiliului Județean Președinte 1817 13.02.2020 Administrație 1818/13.02.2020 Comisia nr. 4 Da Giurgiu a d-lui Preda Ionuț Gabriel Publică Compartimentul Privind aprobarea organigramei și resurse umane și Comisia nr. 2 11. 04.03.2020 statului de funcții ale Spitalului Președinte 2619 04.03.2020 coordonarea 2620/04.03.2020 Da Județean de Urgență Giurgiu activității Comisia nr. 4 instituțiilor publice de cultură Privind rectificarea bugetului propriu de 12. 05.03.2020 venituri și cheltuieli al Județului Giurgiu Președinte 2783 05.03.2020 Direcția economică 2784/05.03.2020 Comisia nr. 1 Da pe anul 2020 Pentru modificarea articolului 1 din Hotărârea nr. 133 din 25 octombrie 2019 a Consiliului Județean Giurgiu, Direcția achiziții Comisia nr. 1 Da 13. 05.03.2020 privind aprobarea documentației Președinte 2767 05.03.2020 publice și investiții 2768/05.03.2020 tehnico-economice pentru obiectivul de în infrastructura Comisia nr. 3 investiții ”Bază tehnico-materială pentru locală creșterea vitezei de răspuns în situații de urgență”, în faza studiu de fezabilitate Privind aprobarea Regulamentului de acordare a burselor de ajutor social pentru elevii școlarizați în cadrul Școlii Comisia nr. 1 Da 14. 05.03.2020 Gimnaziale nr. 1 Giurgiu în semestrul II Președinte 2796 05.03.2020 Direcția economică 2797/05.03.2020 al anului școlar 2019-2020 și în Comisia nr. 2 semestrul I al anului școlar 2020-2021, precum și a numărului și cuantumului acestora F – PG.15.01 Pentru modificarea art.2 din Anexa la Hotărârea nr. 12 din 8 februarie 2016 privind aprobarea Regulamentului de Direcția juridică și Comisia nr. 4 15. 05.03.2020 organizare și funcționare al serviciului Președinte 2724 05.03.2020 administrație 2725/05.03.2020 Da social cu cazare Casa de tip familial publică Comisia nr. 2 ”Ioana” din cadrul Direcției Generale de Asistență Socială și Protecția Copiului Giurgiu Privind aprobarea înființării echipei Direcția juridică și Comisia nr. 4 16. 05.03.2020 mobile pentru intervenția de urgență în Președinte 2726 05.03.2020 administrație 2727/05.03.2020 Da cazurile de violență domestică publică Comisia nr. 2 Privind mandatarea Direcției Generale de Asietență Socială și Protecția Direcția juridică și Comisia nr. 4 17. 05.03.2020 Copilului Giurgiu pentru organizarea și Președinte 2728 05.03.2020 administrație 2729/05.03.2020 Da realizarea activităților de contractare de publică Comisia nr. 2 servicii sociale acordate de furnizori publici și privați Privind acordarea unor sprijine Comisia nr. 1 18. 09.03.2020 financiare Președinte 2902 09.03.2020 Direcția economică 2903/09.03.2020 Da Comisia nr. 2 Privind alocarea sumei de 20.000 lei Comisia nr. 1 19. 09.03.2020 Asociației Nonguvernamentale Partida Președinte 2900 09.03.2020 Direcția economică 2901/09.03.2020 Da Romilor „Pro Europa” Comisia nr. 2 Privind modificarea şi completarea Anexei nr.4.1 - Lista poziției globale Direcția achiziții Comisia nr. 1 20. 09.03.2020 „Alte cheltuieli de investiții” defalcată Președinte 2837 09.03.2020 publice și investiții 2838/09.03.2020 Da pe capitole Buget 2020, la Hotărârea în infrastructura Comisia nr. 3 nr.3 din 14 februarie 2020 a Consiliului locală Județean Giurgiu Privind aprobarea închiderii serviciului social cu cazare Casa de tip familial Direcția juridică și Comisia nr. 4 21. 10.03.2020 ”Casa Mea” din cadrul Direcţiei Președinte 2923 10.03.2020 administrație 2924/10.03.2020 Generale de Asistenţă Socială şi publică Comisia nr. 2 Da Protecţia Copilului Giurgiu Privind atribuirea denumirii de strada „Aleea Magnolia” pentru drumul de acces reprezentat de lotul nr.27, compus Direcției logistică Comisia nr. 4 din teren în suprafaţă de 2786 mp, situat Președinte 2969 10.03.2020 managementul 2970/10.03.2020 Da 22. 10.03.2020 în comuna Bolintin Deal, judeţul spitalelor şi Comisia nr. 3 Giurgiu, înscris în Cartea Funciară patrimoniu nr.4157 a localităţii Bolintin-Deal, identificat cu numărul cadastral 4157, aflat în domeniul public al județului Giurgiu F – PG.15.01 Privind aprobarea depunerii de către Direcţia Generală de Asistenţă Socială şi Protecţia Copilului Giurgiu a unei cereri de finanţare nerambursabilă Compartimentului Comisia nr. 1 23. 10.03.2020 pentru înființarea unui Centru de Zi în Președinte 2935 10.03.2020 dezvoltare regională 2936/10.03.2020 zona aferentă teritoriului GAL Giurgiu Comisia nr. 4 Est a judeţului Giurgiu , respectiv în Da comuna Hotarele în cadrul Programului de Dezvoltare Rurală 2014-2020, Măsura 5/6B „Sprijin pentru înfiinţarea şi modernizarea unităţilor de infrastructură socială” Privind darea în folosință gratuită a unor echipamente achiziționate în cadrul proiectului ”Investiții pentru siguranța rutieră și îmbunătățirea conectivității Direcției logistică între municipalitatea Ruse și județul managementul Comisia nr. 1 24. 11.03.2020 Giurgiu la rețeaua de transport TEN- Președinte 3077 11.03.2020 spitalelor şi 3078/11.03.2020 T”(Investing in Road Safety and patrimoniu Comisia nr. 4 Improving the Connectivity of Ruse Da Municipality and Giurgiu County to TEN-T Transport Network), Cod proiect ROBG-418, către Direcția Județeană de Transport, Administrarea Drumurilor Județene și Control Trafic Giurgiu, beneficiar final al proiectului Pentru utilizarea sumei de 100.000 lei 25. 11.03.2020 pentru cheltuieli ocazionate de măsuri în Președinte 3032 11.03.2020 Direcția economică 3033/11.03.2020 Comisia nr. 1 privința prevenirii și limitării răspândirii Da îmbolnăvirilor cu coronavirus Privind constatarea încetării de drept înainte de expirarea duratei normale a Secretarul general al 26. 12.03.2020 mandatului a calității de consilier Președinte 3116 12.03.2020 județului 1848/14.02.2020 Comisia nr. 4 județean a domnului Florian Velicu și Da vacantarea locului de consilier județean ocupat de acesta Privind repartizarea pe unități administrativ – teritoriale a sumelor Comisia nr. 1 27. 16.03.2020 defalcate din taxa pe valoarea adăugată Președinte 3192 16.03.2020 Direcția economică 3193/16.03.2020 Da pentru drumuri județene și comunale, pe Comisia nr. 3 anul 2020 F – PG.15.01 Privind modificarea și completarea art.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspectives of the Business Area Development in the Romanian Rural Area
    НАУЧНИ ТРУДОВЕ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ - 2013, том 52, серия 5.1 Perspectives of the business area development in the Romanian rural area. Case study Calarasi county Daniela Cretu1 Elena Lascăr2 Abstract: The rural area in Călăraşi county has a particular importance for the development of the county, so its analysis wants to identify the vital positive and negative elements for its sustainable development. With a decreasing population and its density of about 61 inhabitants/km should be considered mainly a predominant rural county, with over half of the population in rural area in 2012, which represents a much higher value than the average of the recently integrated EU countries. Thus, the rural and agricultural development will form a solid pillar. The success and prosperity of the county depend on their economic performances. The county is dependent on agriculture and on rural economy. The spread of globalization threatens the traditional agriculture. Key words: agriculture, active population, employed population, investments, rural area resources. INTRODUCTION Călăraşi county is part of South-Muntenia development Region, it was declared as territorial-administrative unit in January 1981, it is situated in the South-East part of Romania, on the left shore of the Danube and Borcea Branch and it borders in the North with Ialomiţa county, in the East with Constanţa county, in the West with Giurgiu county and Ilfov Agricultural Sector and in the South with Bulgaria [2]. The county has a surface of 508,785 ha, representing 2.1% of Romania, Călăraşi county occupies 28th place among the country counties [4]. From administrative point of view, the county contains 2 municipalities, 3 towns, 50 communes and 161 villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania - Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review Th 15 Session of the UPR - Human Rights Council
    Romania - Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review th 15 session of the UPR - Human Rights Council Contributed by: El Tera Association Roma Center for Social Intervention and Studies- Romani CRISS Sanse Egale Association Sange Egale pentru Copii si Femei 1 INTRODUCTION Under the universal periodic review, the submitting organizations have used primarily information collected by Romani CRISS, during 2008 until present, since Romania was most recently evaluated under the UPR. Romani CRISS, as well as human rights local monitors’ organizations, are documenting cases in the field cases of violation of human rights of the Roma communities’ members. The current submission will focus on the following areas: right to human dignity; right to life; right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, right not to be discriminated against; freedom of movement and right to leave any country; right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being – with a particular focus on housing and medical care; right to education. The submission will also look at developments since the previous review, particularly normative and institutional framework, for the promotion and protection of human rights. 1. DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE MAY 2008 SESSION Content of recommendation no 6 To continue to respect and promote the human rights of vulnerable groups, including the Roma communities and to continue to take further action to ensure equal enjoyment of human rights by Roma people, as well as to take further appropriate and effective measures to eliminate discrimination against Roma and ensures in particular their access to education, housing, healthcare and employment without discrimination, and gives a follow up to the recommendations of the United Nations human rights bodies in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Dimension of Wheat Production in Romania
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Territorial dimension of wheat production in Romania Zaharia, Marian and Gogonea, Rodica- Manuela and Balacescu, Aniela Facultatea de S, tiint, e Economice, Universitatea Petrol-Gaze din Ploies, ti, Facultatea de Statistică, Cibernetică s, i Informatică Economică, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucures, ti, Universitatea “Constantin Brâncuşi” din Târgu Jiu 19 November 2020 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106301/ MPRA Paper No. 106301, posted 04 Mar 2021 07:58 UTC TERRITORIAL DIMENSION OF WHEAT PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA MARIAN ZAHARIA1, RODICA-MANUELA GOGONEA2, ANIELA BĂLĂCESCU3 Abstract: Romania's significant agricultural productive potential can fully cover domestic demand and can ensure important export deliveries. However, the yield of cereal production is below the European Union average. Of these, an important place is occupied by wheat production. Taking into account these aspects, the paper investigates the potential of wheat production in Romanian counties starting from a set of indicators and using cluster analysis to identify similarities and disparities between counties from this point of view. Through this study we tried to provide answers to the questions: What is the configuration of wheat production yield at the regional level in Romania? What is its evolution over time? The results obtained during the research show that there are disparities in the counties of Romania in terms of the efficiency of wheat production in correlation with the resources used for its production. Keywords: agricultural sector, wheat production, production yield, regional development, Romania JEL classification: C10, C38, O13 INTRODUCTION Balanced territorial development, including the adoption of rural development measures, embodied in national and regional programs to address the needs and challenges facing rural areas, are major objectives pursued by the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union (CAP, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Roma As Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania
    Roma as Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Roderick Charles Lawford DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated, and the thesis has not been edited by a third party beyond what is permitted by Cardiff University’s Policy on the Use of Third Party Editors by Research Degree Students. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… ii To Sue Lawford and In Memory of Marion Ethel Lawford (1924-1977) and Charles Alfred Lawford (1925-2010) iii Table of Contents List of Figures vi List of Plates vii List of Tables ix Conventions x Acknowledgements xii Abstract xiii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 - Theory and Method
    [Show full text]
  • Ecthr Boaca and Others V. Romania
    FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 40355/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 12 January 2016 FINAL 12/04/2016 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Boacă and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: András Sajó, President, Vincent A. De Gaetano, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Egidijus Kūris, Iulia Antoanella Motoc, Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 1 December 2015, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 40355/11) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by seven Romanian nationals (“the applicants”), on 13 June 2011. A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2. The applicants were represented by Romani Criss, a non-governmental organisation based in Romania. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms C. Brumar, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. The applicants alleged that I.B. had been a victim of police brutality, that the ensuing investigation was flawed, and that the victim had been discriminated against on the ground of his Roma origin. 4. On 29 January 2013 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • River Restoration Experience in Romania
    RIVER RESTORATION EXPERIENCE IN ROMANIA Elisabeta Cserwid NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT 1 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September BACKGROUND Romania is founding member of ECRR, which was set up in 1999 National Administration “Apele Romane” (ANAR) is member in Board Council of the ECRR Since September 2001, the Romanian Centre of River Restoration (RCRR ) was established through the Order of Ministry of Waters and Environment ( Art.7 in Water Law) 2 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September ACTIVITIES 1999 – first national Workshop regarding “The Ecological River Restoration”, was organized by The National Administration “Romanian Waters” and National Institute of Environmental Research in Bucharest; 1999 – Board Meeting of ECRR was held in Bucharest; 2000 – The Training Course on ”River Restoration” organized by the National Administration “Romanian Waters” together with the Romanian Centre for River Restoration (RCRR) in co- operation with experts from RIZA – The Netherlands and WWF- Germany took place in Bucharest 3 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September ACTIVITIES 2003 -Interministerial Committee Work Meeting on Green Corridor of Lower Danube under the presidency of State Secretary in Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection and President of Romanian Centre for River Restoration was held in Bucharest 2010 - “National River Restoration Centres/ Networks” - Seminar organized by ECRR and ANAR in Bucharest 4 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September LEGAL FRAMEWORK The framework of river restoration topic in Romania is represented by: Water Law 107/1996 with modifications and completions; Ministerial Order 1215/2008 . 5 EUR- INBO 2011 International Conference, Porto 27-30 September PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED 1998 – Restoration of Babina and Cernovca islands within Green Corridor Project ( INCDD – Tulcea); 2002 Restoration of Comana Wetland – Pr.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Distribuţie Companies – 51 Million Euros Investment in Smart Meter Programme in Romania During 2015-2020
    Media Relations T +40 372 115 694 F +40 372-87.33.42 [email protected] e-distributie.com E-DISTRIBUŢIE COMPANIES – 51 MILLION EUROS INVESTMENT IN SMART METER PROGRAMME IN ROMANIA DURING 2015-2020 • By the end of 2020, almost 900,000 customers of the Enel Group’s Romanian distribution companies will have smart meters • This year’s smart meter project will involve an investment of over 56 million lei (approximately 12 million euros) • During 2015–2020 the investment made by the distribution companies, part of Enel Group in Romania, in the smart meter programme reaches 51 million euros (app. 240 million lei) Bucharest, 7 iulie, 2020 – By the end of 2020, almost 900,000 customers of the Romanian distribution companies of the Enel Group, a world leader and pioneer in the smart meter technology, will benefit from the smart meter technology, while the investment since 2015 reaches approximately 51 million euros (approximately 240 million lei). This year E-Distribuție Muntenia, Dobrogea and Banat will install over 170,000 new smart meters in the areas where they operate, for an investment of over 56 million lei (approximately 12 million euros). The E-Distributie companies are the largest operator in Romania by the total number of smart meters installed so far. “The customer’s needs are at the very core of the energy transition. In order to empower him to do more with the energy he uses the smart meter is mandatory, while digitalization have proven to be of utmost importance during the last months, as we all had to adapt to a new paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Regional Development - the Secretariat
    European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT - PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN EUROPÄISCHES PARLAMENT COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT THE SECRETARIAT January 2011 REPORT OF THE DELEGATION TO ROMANIA 03 - 05 NOVEMBER 2010 cf. Google Images European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary................................................................................................................... 3 03 November............................................................................................................. 5 04 November............................................................................................................. 6 05 November............................................................................................................. 9 Concluding remarks ................................................................................................ 12 ANNEXES.............................................................................................................. 13 European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat Summary Subject Visit to Romania Main objective: To obtain a better insight on the ground into the efficiency and effects of Structural Funds implementation in Romania - by visiting a series of projects in Giurgiu, Arad and Timisoara and discussing with local, regional and national authorities on priority issues related to the implementation of EU regional development policy and use
    [Show full text]
  • New Results for Maize Crops Cultivated in the No-Tillage System at the National Institute for Agricultural Mechanization from Băneasa- Bucharest
    Universitatea de Ştiinţe Agricole şi Medicină Veterinară Ia şi NEW RESULTS FOR MAIZE CROPS CULTIVATED IN THE NO-TILLAGE SYSTEM AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION FROM BĂNEASA- BUCHAREST Nicolae ȘARPE1 , Ion PIRNEA2, Eugen MARIN2, Gheorghe NITU3 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In Romania, maize is the main cultivated plant and maize crops are extremely important from an economic point of view. Research with the no-tillage system applied to maize crops were made in the Romanian Plain, Șarpe (1968, 1987, 2000, 2008, 2009), in Banat, Moțiu (2004) and in the Flood Plain of the Danube River, Șarpe (2004, 2005, 2007, 2008). The results obtained in Romania confirm the results of the research made in other countries: Philips and Young (1973), Köller (1999), Derpsch (2001). In the conventional system, under the weather conditions of the year 2011, the grain yield recorded from the maize crops amounted to 6,200 kg/ha, while in the no-tillage system a grain yield of 6,500 kg/ha was recorded ‒ so the yields obtained in the two technological systems were practically equal. However, there were significant differences in terms of Diesel fuel consumption. For example, in the conventional system, a 78 litres/ha Diesel fuel consumption was recorded, while in the no-tillage system this amounted to only 25 litres/ha. Big differences were also recorded as regards the expenses in the conventional and no-tillage systems. In the conventional system, the expenses incurred for all the mechanical works performed from the sowing stage to the harvesting stage amounted to RON 2,350.00 per hectare, while in the no-tillage system, they amounted to only RON 610,00 per hectare.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruse and Giurgiu County Council
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of Ruse-Giurgiu Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Cross-border cooperation development .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Cross-border cooperation between Bulgaria and Romania - Ruse district and Giurgiu County ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 17 3.1 Ruse District and Giurgiu County - geographical confines ......................................... 17 3.2 Ruse District and Giurgiu County as part of the Romania - Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Program ................................................................................................... 22 4. CBC Bulgaria and Romania - good practices ....................................................................... 26 4.1 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 1: ‘’Accessibility‘’ .............................. 26 4.2 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 2: ‘’Environment‘’ ............................. 30 4.3 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 3: ‘’Economic and Social Development‘’ .............................................................................................................. 37 4.4 Best practices
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Agricultural Labor Force and Its Impact on Agricultural Products Obtained in the South-Muntenia Region
    Copyright © 2021 University of Bucharest Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2021; 26(3): 2640-2649 Printed in Romania. All rights reserved doi: 10.25083/rbl/26.3/2640.2649 ISSN print: 1224-5984 ISSN online: 2248-3942 Received for publication, October, 1, 2020 Accepted, January, 8, 2021 Original paper Analysis of the agricultural labor force and its impact on agricultural products obtained in the South-Muntenia region FLORINA RUXANDRA TEODORESCU1, LIVIU MĂRCUȚĂ1*, CĂTĂLINA- NICOLETA COMAN1, VALENTINA CONSTANȚA TUDOR1 1University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, 59 Marasti, Romania Abstract This paper aims to highlight the impact that the labor force in the agricultural sector has on the production obtained from the main crops in the South-Muntenia development region, Romania, in the period 2014-2018. Following the study of theoretical aspects in the fields mentioned above and combining these studies with the interpretation and analysis of statistical data, an analysis will be established to establish the level at which the agricultural labor force in the South-Muntenia region impacts the productions of five important crops. Romanian agricultural sector, respectively: wheat, corn, sunflower, rapeseed and soybeans. In the South-Muntenia region, made up of Argeș, Călărași, Dâmbovița, Giurgiu, Ialomița, Prahova and Teleorman counties, the percentage of people working in the agricultural sector in 2018 was 27.8% of the total population of this region. Keywords South Muntenia region, labor force, population, area, production. To cite this article: TEODORESCU FR, MĂRCUȚĂ L, COMAN CN, TUDOR VC. Analysis of the agricultural labor force and its impact on agricultural products obtained in the South-Muntenia region.
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Title Here
    THE NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM – THE RURAL STAKEHOLDERS Laurențiu RADU1 1 Phd. Student, Bucharest University of Economics Studies, email: [email protected] Abstract The purpose of the following article is to highlight the level of interest of the local stakeholders regarding the construction and development of the natural gas transportation system. The European Council highlighted the need to modernize and expand the gas transportation infrastructure along with the importance of interconnecting the energy systems of the European Countries in order to ensure a secure and competitive energy market for all its members. In Romania the natural gas transportation system is owned by Transgaz S.A. Medias, company which is listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange market. The ministry of Economy is the majority stockholder, with 58,51% while the rest of the stocks being in the hold of legal entities and individual persons. Because of its important strategic position, Romania can benefit from important amounts of European funds in order to expand the gas infrastructure. At this time, the company managed to secure an 179,32 million euro grant and is on its way to build one of the largest gas pipelines from Romania, the BRUA pipeline which will create a gas highway between Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Austria. Key words: natural gas, gas pipeline, BRUA, stakeholders 1. Introduction The EU development strategy for 2020, places the energy infrastructure on the first place, highlighting the urgent need to update the European energy networks
    [Show full text]