DOCSLIB.ORG

La Masonería En El Mundo – Rusia (3) Archivo C I E M - Madrid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
La Masonería En El Mundo – Rusia (3) Archivo C I E M - Madrid 2011 La Masonería en el mundo – Rusia (3) Archivo C I E M - Madrid Documentación - países Adrian Mac Liman Centro Ibérico de Estudios Masónicos (CIEM) 03/04/2011 Noteworthy members Of the Grand Orient of France in Russia and the Supreme Council of the Grand Orient of Russia’s People Compiled by Mr. Andrei Priahin, Moscow, Russia The following list of names is derived from the writings of a number of Russian authors and is presented with no guarantee of accuracy. The authors' historical and political objectivity is not without question, nor are their citations and souces documented. Note that neither the Grand Orient of France in Russia nor the Grand Orient of Russia’s People are recognized as regular Freemasonry. Name Notes Lodges Vyrubov Grigoriy Nikolayevich Mason of 33° of French rite. "Rose of the perfect silence" (1843 - 1913) "Grand Orient of France". (Worshipful Master), From 1888 a French citizen. "Grand Lodge of France", Professor of philosophy; a friend of "Grand Orient of France", August Comte, one of founders of Chairman of Convent of the positive philosophy; edited journal "Grand Orient of France".. "La philosophie positive" (1867-1883) together with Charles Robin. The former Scottish rite mason. Initiated on Jan. 7, 1874 in Paris. Permanently demanded involvement of Scottish rite free masonry in real life affairs, had a conflict with "Grand Lodge of France" (Scottish rite) and joined much more politicized "Grand Orient of France" (French rite). Worshipful Master of the emigrants" lodge "Rose of the perfect silence", member of Council of lodges, Chairman of Convent of the "Grand Orient of France" since 1882. Luginin V.F. Initiated by recommendation of G.N. Initiated in Paris in the end of Vyrubov XIX century. Grand Orient of France. Yablochkov P. N. First recognized inventor of Worshipful Master of three incandescent-filament bulb in the Scottish rite lodges in Paris, world. Initiated in the first three creator and the first Worshipful stepsof Scottish rite mason in the master of Scottish lodge beginning of 1876. Worshipful Master "Cosmos", 1887-1888. After its of three lodges in Paris under closure it resumed activities ten jurisdiction of Supreme Council of the years later, in 1898. French lodges"(Scottish rite). Created lodge "Cosmos" on June 25 1887 in Paris under the jurisdiction of the "Supreme Council of French lodges" of Scottish rite. Was its first Worshipful Master. His idee fix was to attract young and rich (!) Russian intellectuals learning in Paris, be it natural science or humanities and art students, so the entrance and annual fees was extremely high. He dreamed of "quality" lodge. Among young adepts were M.M. Kovalevsky (had his own villa at the French Riviere where later used to arrive to his friend Anton Pavlovich Chekhov, great Russian dramatist), S.A. Kotlerovsky (Kotlyarevsky), de Roberti la Serda that was all initiated in the Parisian "Cosmos" lodge in 1888. By his recommendation was initiated N.N. Bazhenov. N.N. Bazhenov was initiated in three steps of Scottish Rite by recommendation of P.N. Yablochkov in 1884. Muromtsev S.A. Professor. The first Moscow Masonic circle Founder of the first Moscow Masonic "Beseda" ("The Conversation") circle "Beseda" ("The Conversation"). Deputy of I State Duma. Zhdan-Pushkin Andrei French rite free mason when studied "Les etudiants" ("Students"), in Paris. Lodge of the Quatier Latin Paris, Grand Orient of France. and Sorbonne. Staal Alexey F. French rite free mason when studied "Les etudiants" ("Students"), in Paris. Lodge of the Quatier Latin Paris, Grand Orient of France. and Sorbonne. Rapp Yevgeniy French rite free mason when studied "Les etudiants" ("Students"), in Paris. Lodge of the Quatier Latin Paris, Grand Orient of France. and Sorbonne. Arkadsky-Dobrenovich French rite free mason when studied "Les etudiants" ("Students"), Constantin in Paris. Lodge of the Quatier Latin Paris, Grand Orient of France. and Sorbonne. "Cosmos"(№288) Scottish rite Writer. Initiated as an apprentice in lodge (resumed from 1898) in the "Cosmos" (№288) Scottish rite Paris. Worshipful Master d-r lodge (resumed from 1898) in Paris. Nicole. Amfiteatrov Alexander V. Writer and journalist. "Cosmos"(№288) Scottish rite May 16, 1905 initiated in Scottish rite lodge (resumed from 1898) in lodge "Cosmos" (№288) in Paris. Paris. Worshipful Master d-r Later in Russia Worshipful Master of Nicole. various free masons" lodges. Khodorkowski Mechanic. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Lebedinsky Dentist. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Dubnikov Dmitry Actor. Member of a lodge in France. Grand Orient of France Ivanovsky Sculptor. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Kerkov Industrialist. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Krasnov-senior Commissioner. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Krasnov-junior Engineer. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Levidov Member of a lodge in France. Grand Orient of France Raisky Industrialist. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Rozanov N.S. Member of a lodge in France. Grand Orient of France Stoikov Physician (then a student). Member Grand Orient of France of a lodge in France. Trigorov Engineer Iwho worked in Algier). Grand Orient of France Member of a lodge in France. Wilbuszewicz Member of a lodge in France. Grand Orient of France Zelinsky Physician. Member of a lodge in Grand Orient of France France. Sergeyev-Tsensky Writer, popular in the Soviet time. Grand Orient of France Member of a lodge in France. d-r Nicole (Finkelstein A Polish Jew from Romania "Cosmos"(№288) Scottish rite Nathan) (Bucharest), French citizen (from 8 lodge (resumed from 1898) in April 1890), Worshipful Master of the Paris. Worshipful Master d-r awakened from the sleep the Nicole. "Cosmos" (№288) Scottish rite lodge Other Russian members: in Paris. M.M. Kovalevsky, Roberti la Serda (both since April 29 1904), Amfiteatrov, Gambarov, Tamamshev, Ye. Anichkin (all since 16 May 1905), Kedrin, Maklakov and Vasiliy Ivanovich Nemirovich-Danchenko, K. Arkadsky-Dobrenovich, I.Z. Loris-Melikov, A. Trachevsky. After Kedrin’s interview in The New Time, the reactionary newspaper Rech wrote: "Kedrin admitted with his Jesuitical frankness that he’s a participant of one of the freemasonic lodges, but foreign ones." This "but foreign ones" changes much, because Kedrin was dismissed from top rank freemasons because of admittance of belonging to Russian masons.It’s clear that it was just a pretext to make him go. De Roberti de Castro la Serda Initiated in the Scottish rite "Cosmos" Initiated in the Scottish rite Ye. V. lodge in 1887-1888 by Yablochkov "Cosmos" lodge in 1887-1888. P.N. among other Russian students First "Cosmo" (№ 288). The studying in France. resumed Scottish rite lodge April 29, 1905 initiated in the "Cosmo" (№288). Both in Paris. resumed Scottish rite lodge "Cosmos" (№288) in Paris. Blanc R.M. Participant of the first lodges in Participant of the first lodges in Russia. Russia. Prugavin A.S. Participant of the first lodges in Participant of the first lodges in Russia. Russia. Starkova V. Journalist. Lady- mason. Initiated in Paris in the end of XIX century. French rite free masonry. Galperin-Kaminsky I.D. Translator. Initiated in Paris in the end of XIX century. Berberov R.I. Banker. Initiated in Paris in the end of XIX century. Arszawski A.M. Physician. Initiated in Paris in the end of XIX century. Lunacharsky Anatoliy Bolshevik Govt minister of education "Grand Orient of France Vasilyevich (October 1917 - 1929). Trotsky (Bronstein) Lev Organizer of the Red Army. Lenin"s Davidovich right hand. Ideologist of the permanent revolution and of the world dominance of communism. According to Nina Berberova, he had been a free mason for several months when he was 17 years old. Lenin (Ulyanov) Vladimir Iyich Founder of the Communist Party, of Allegedly "L"Union de Belleville" (1970 - 1924) the largest totalitarian state and of (Paris). the extremist antinational form of the communist and socialist ideology. The first of the greatest dictators of the 20th century. Russian of German, Swedish, Jewish and Kalmyk roots. His grandgrandfather, who was burgemeister of one of the Hansa cities acquired a reputation of extremely cruel ruler. Lenin considered German language to be his second native one. Considered Jews, Letts and Hungarians to be more clever and appropriate for making socialist revolution than "those lazy Russians". By this reason stimulated proliferation, including marriages, of Jews and Letts into the ruling elite of the new Soviet state, now known as "nomenclature". (In the 30s Letts and their families were repressed. In the 50s when there came the turn of Jews Stalin died and failed to resurrect pure Russian ruling class). Lenin co-operated secretly with many forces that enabled him to usurp State power in Russia, including German General Staff through, for example, Alexander Lazarevich Parvus (Gelfand), shadow tutor of Lenin and Trotsky, big businessman, etc., this "Louis Cypher" of the Russian revolution whose connections with Geman military circles were revealed and published by a free mason P.N. Pereverzev. Allegedly French rite mason of the "L"Union de Belleville" (Paris) in 1902. Lenin was a fan and a close friend of the revolutionary pop-singer G.M. Montegus who occurred to have been a French police informer. Besides he was a member of the Masonic lodge "L"Union de Belleville" (Paris). Nemirovich -Danchenko Son of the Russian merchant. "Cosmos"(№288) Scottish rite Vladimir Semyonovich He was a friend and assistant of of lodge (resumed from 1898) in the world famous theatre reformer Paris. (Worshipful Master d-r K.S. Stanislavsky (in U.S.A. his Nicole). Scottish rite lodge "Mont modern follower was Leigh Strasberg Sinai" (№6) 1905 in Paris.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Historical Legacy for Contemporary Russian Foreign Policy
    CHAPTER 1 The Historical Legacy for Contemporary Russian Foreign Policy o other country in the world is a global power simply by virtue of geogra- N phy.1 The growth of Russia from an isolated, backward East Slavic principal- ity into a continental Eurasian empire meant that Russian foreign policy had to engage with many of the world’s principal centers of power. A Russian official trying to chart the country’s foreign policy in the 18th century, for instance, would have to be concerned simultaneously about the position and actions of the Manchu Empire in China, the Persian and Ottoman Empires (and their respec- tive vassals and subordinate allies), as well as all of the Great Powers in Europe, including Austria, Prussia, France, Britain, Holland, and Sweden. This geographic reality laid the basis for a Russian tradition of a “multivector” foreign policy, with leaders, at different points, emphasizing the importance of rela- tions with different parts of the world. For instance, during the 17th century, fully half of the departments of the Posolskii Prikaz—the Ambassadors’ Office—of the Muscovite state dealt with Russia’s neighbors to the south and east; in the next cen- tury, three out of the four departments of the College of International Affairs (the successor agency in the imperial government) covered different regions of Europe.2 Russian history thus bequeaths to the current government a variety of options in terms of how to frame the country’s international orientation. To some extent, the choices open to Russia today are rooted in the legacies of past decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • American‑Russian Relations in the Times of the American Civil War (1861‑1865)
    Studies into the History of Russia and Central-Eastern Europe ■ XLVIII Hanna Marczewska‑Zagdańska Historical Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences American‑Russian relations in the times of the American Civil War (1861‑1865) Outline: The 1860s were marked by an exceptional affection and friendship in the bilateral relations between the United States, a young American republic, and the long‑established tsarist Russia. This phenomenon, which had never occurred with such intensity before or since, inspired Russian and American researchers and politicians to organize The Tsar and the President: Alexander II and Abraham Lincoln, Liberator and Emancipator exhibition which was displayed, inter alia, in Moscow in 2011. The following article analyses (on the basis of numerous source materials from the period) the reasons of this mutual amity and trust, as well as their military and eco‑ nomic cooperation—both internal (the Civil War in the U.S., the January Uprising in the Russian Empire), and external (the rivalry with Great Britain and France, and political calculations in the search for suitable alliances)—in the period of world power rivalry for global spheres of influence. Keywords: President Lincoln, Tsar Aleksander II, US Civil War, Russian Empire, Polish Insurrection of 1863, Russian Fleet, United States – Foreign Relations – Russia, Russia – Foreign Relations – United States, 19th Century Diplomatic History. On February 22, 2011, the seat of the State Archive of the Russian Federation in Moscow saw the unveiling of an exhibition under the surprising and intriguing title “The Tsar and the President: Alexander II and Abraham Lincoln, Liberator and Emancipator”. Conceived on the initiative of the American‑Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation and already displayed in the United States in 2008‑2009, the exhibition attracted a large number of visitors and enthusiasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Agenda
    LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 2019 MOSCOW NONPROLIFERATION CONFERENCE November 7–9, 2019 1. ÅBERG SOMOGYI Martina, Korean Peninsula Desk Officer, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Sweden 2. AIKI Toshihiro, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary, Сhargé D'affaires, Embassy of Japan to the Russian Federation 3. AKHMETOV Alimzhan, Director, Center for International Security and Policy, Kazakhstan 4. AKHTAMZYAN Ildar, Associate Professor, Department of International Relations and Foreign Policy of Russia, School of International Relations, Moscow State Institute for International Relations (MGIMO–University), Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Russian Federation 5. ALIPOR NANDEL Mohammadreza, Second Secretary, Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Russian Federation 6. APARO Massimo, Deputy Director General, Head of Department of Safeguards, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 7. ARAGHCHI Abbas, Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs, Islamic Republic of Iran 8. ARIFFIN Irsyad Arif, First Secretary, Embassy of Malaysia to the Russian Federation 9. ARO -SÁNCHEZ Miia, Counsellor, Unit for Arms Control, Political Department, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Finland 10. ARTISYUK Vladimir, Advisor to the Director General, State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM, Russian Federation 11. BANNYKH Igor, Counsellor, Department of Customs Infrastructure, Eurasian Economic Commission 12. BARZEGAR Kayhan, Director, Institute for Middle East Strategic Studies (IMESS); Chair, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Science
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Great Power Identity on Its Bumpy Journey Through Time
    CEEISA-ISA Joint International Conference Anatoly Reshetnikov 23-25 June 2016, Ljubljana Central European University _____________________________________________________________________________________ Russia’s great power identity on its bumpy journey through time. Introduction Recently, Russia has been talking a lot about being a great power.1 In fact, it has even insisted that such a state like Russia had to either be a great power, or not be at all.2 In the western discourse, the term ‘great power’ immediately evokes unambiguous connotations. Namely, it is believed to be related to some privileged status in the international system. This status is associated either with a claim to be one of a few real policy-makers (as neorealists have argued),3 or with a claim for some rights and responsibilities in relation to the management of international order (as has been suggested by the English School of IR).4 Hence, it is those specifically IR-related associations that Russian great power rhetoric elicited in the west. Most observers perceived it as a question of foreign policy. Yet, if one looks carefully enough, it becomes obvious that Russia’s great power discourse does not operate the way the western observers expect it operate. On the one hand, when Russia talks about being a great power, it often places itself in a strong opposition to the rest of the great power club and shows its clear dissatisfaction with the existing international order.5 As a result, it is perceived by the west as an unpredictable trouble-maker rather than a great power in the English School’s terms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decembrist Revolt and Its Aftermath: Values in Conflict by Robert F
    The Decembrist Revolt and its Aftermath: Values in Conflict by Robert F. Baumann Editor’s Note: Look for Shushanna Baumann’s companion piece to this article in the upcoming Special Report featuring papers presented at the 2019 Fort Leavenworth Ethics Symposium. n December 1825, a group of Russian conspirators attempted to seize power by carrying out an uprising against the tsarist regime. Known as the Decembrist Revolt, Soviet historians embraced the episode as a precursor to the Bolshevik Revolution, which followed a century Ilater. Less well known is that fact that the Decembrist Revolt drew inspiration from the American Revolution and U.S. Constitution. Made up primarily of nobles, officers and professionals, the Decembrists—as they came to be known later—offer a fascinating example of the complexity of ethical decision making. Moved by moral and political convictions to undertake an astonishingly brash and dangerous takeover, they gave meticulous thought to the justification, methods and end state of this extraordinary endeavor. Not only did they leave behind extensive documents and correspondence, but many survivors were extensively interviewed in the aftermath. This record faithfully reflects a process of principled ethical reasoning as well as the phenomenal complexity in taking the drastic step from discussion and debate to action.1 This essay explores the implications of Decembrist actions and their aftermath, as well as the resonance of the entire episode in Russian politics today. Since the period of the Decembrists, there has been a more or less continuous struggle by a significant fraction of Russia’s intellectual class to introduce liberal, Western ideas of legality and governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's “Soft Power”
    RUSSIA’S “SOFT POWER” STRATEGY A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies by Jill Dougherty, B.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. November 1, 2013 RUSSIA’S “SOFT POWER” STRATEGY Jill Dougherty, B.A. MALS Mentor: Angela Stent, Ph.D. ABSTRACT On October 30, 2013 the business-oriented Forbes.com put Russian President Vladimir Putin at the top of its list of “The World’s Most Powerful People,” unseating United States President Barack Obama. Forbes said its editors made the decision based on the power of the person over a large number of people, the financial resources controlled by the person, their power in multiple spheres, and the degree to which they actively use their power. Revisionist media commentary immediately followed the report, pointing out that Russia remains a regional power, that its economy, while improving, still ranks fifth in the world, significantly trailing those of the United States and China. The ranking also appeared to be, at least partially, a reaction to Russia’s skillful shift in diplomacy on the Syrian conflict, by which it proposed a plan to destroy the Assad regime’s chemical weapons. Others noted that Forbes is a conservative publication, and part of its editors’ motivation might have been the desire to criticize a Democratic President. It was, nevertheless, a stunning turn-about for Russia’s President, an indication of how quickly evaluations of a leader and his or her country can shift, based on their perceived influence.
    [Show full text]
  • January17 Cover Eng. 1-2 CURVE1
    Digital Editions available on: Special Issue Magzter.com www.worldfocus.in ISSN 2230-8458 U.S. Library of Congress No. 80910345 445 A Premier Indo-Centric Foreign Affairs Journal Since 1980 JANUARY 2017 NEXT ISSUE 100 Radical Islam & To Reach this location scan Here QR code US $ 17 /WorldFocus.In Terrorism /WorldFocusIn EDITORIAL Today Russia is again going to be as great as the United Soviet Union WORLD was. Russia under Putin is a nimble giant able to make decisions on its own and face the consequences of the same. Lost in space as a super power, today it is back in the reckoning as a country that matters in international relations and can take care of itself. With Russia getting OPEC nations to agree to cut oil production and getting Iran and Saudi FOCUS Arabia to work together and reducing oil output production by almost about 2 % and stabilising oil price at about $ 50 per barrel, INDOCENTRIC FOREIGN AFFAIRS MONTHLY JOURNAL singlehandedly, thus winning the respect of all oil producing nations. Volume XXXVIII Number 1 January 2017 Russia today is largely responsible for maintaining the current oil prices G . Kishore Babu and not letting it to fall. Russia today is willing to play the commercial Editor game to its benefit, and to others as a large oil producer. Investment bankers from the west are making a big bet on Russia and Bhabani Dikshit so are the rich Sovereign funds of the Middle East, after Syria and Managing Editor flexing its diplomatic strength to fix oil prices. Russia today is the flavour of the Middle East that is good for the entire region.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SHADOW Susan Baker Columbia University
    THE SHADOW Susan Baker Columbia University In the 1870s and the 1990s, the area of Yugoslavia became the focal point of many contending interests in the Western and Near Eastern worlds. Although they are removed in time and era, the nature and dynamics of these episodes—the “Eastern Crisis” of 1875-1878 and the Yugoslav Wars of Dissolution between 1991 and 1995—have striking similarities. Both were lengthy, extending through several years of agonizing war. Both elicited multiple international attempts at intervention. In both external interventions brought foreign agendae, which were imposed on the original problem. Both challenged the unity of the current European system. Both caused major political divisions within intervening states. Both entailed particular South Slav issues of rights and governance. Both stemmed from economic problems. Both brought up concerns of imperial or national sovereignty. Both entailed a power vacuum which resulted in foreign takeover. Austrians moved into Bosnia- Herzegovina in 1878. NATO and the EU took over in 1996. Both resolutions were thought to be temporary expedients but were prolonged in the absence of solutions to the original underlying problems. This paper will seek to a) set the international context for the evolution of these crises, b) tell the stories of the first phases of the crises, c) attempt to relate what happened "on the ground" with decisions made in diplomatic circles, and d) draw out the recurring patterns that can be observed. Several caveats are in order. Only the first phases of these crises will be treated in detail because it is believed that at this phase the original problems are in best focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Czechoslovakia (1968), and Afghanistan (1979)
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. U M I films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send U M I a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact U M I directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:42 06 August 2016 New Perspectives on Russian-American Relations
    Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:42 06 August 2016 New Perspectives on Russian-American Relations New Perspectives on Russian-American Relations includes eighteen articles on Russian-American relations from an international roster of leading historians. Covering topics such as trade, diplomacy, art, war, public opinion, race, cul- ture, and more, the essays show how the two nations related to one another across time from their first interactions as nations in the eighteenth century to now. Instead of being dominated by the narrative of the Cold War, New Perspectives on Russian-American Relations models the exciting new scholarship that covers more than the political and diplomatic worlds of the later twen- tieth century and provides scholars with a wide array of the newest research in the field. William Benton Whisenhunt is Professor of History at the College of DuPage, Illinois. Norman E. Saul is Professor Emeritus of Modern Russian History at the Uni- versity of Kansas. Contributors: Ada Ackerman, Monica Cognolato, Paul D’Anieri, Lee A. Far- row, Lyubov Ginzburg, Ivan Kurilla, Erich Lippman, Kathleen S. Macfie, Mat- thew Lee Miller, Vladimir V. Noskov, Alexander Yu. Petrov, Norman E. Saul, Susan Smith-Peter, Vladimir V. Sogrin, Pavel Tribunskiy, William Benton Whisenhunt, Sergei I. Zhuk, Victoria I. Zhuravleva Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:42 06 August 2016 Routledge Studies in Cultural History 1 The Politics of Information in 8 Making British Culture Early Modern Europe English Readers and the Scottish Edited by Brendan Dooley Enlightenment, 1740–1830 and Sabrina Baron David Allan 2 The Insanity of Place/The Place 9 Empires and Boundaries of Insanity Rethinking Race, Class, and Essays on the History of Psychiatry Gender in Colonial Settings Andrew Scull Edited by Harald Fischer-Tiné and Susanne Gehrmann 3 Film, History, and Cultural Citizenship 10 Tobacco in Russian History Sites of Production and Culture Edited by Tina Mai Chen and From the Seventeenth Century David S.
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw East European Review
    Warsaw Contributors of this volume . VIII/2018 vol East Marijuš Antonovič | Metthew Bryza | Barbara Curyło | Aydan Er Daniel Fried | Graeme Herd | Jan Holzer | Kakhaber Kalichava Shahla Kazimova | Paweł Kowal | Valeriy Kravchenko European WEER Yevhen Kutsenko | Yevhen Mahda | Olga Maksymovych Jan Malicki | Petr Martínek | John S. Micgiel | Uliana Movchan Review Teimuraz Papaskiri | Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz | Mykola Volume VIII/2018 | Revised Riabchuk | Evmorfia-Chrysovalantou Seiti | Konrad Zasztowt Małgorzata Zawadzka editorial discussion Trump, America and Eastern TRUMP, AMERICA AND EASTERN EUROPE EASTERN AMERICA AND TRUMP, Europe R Kowal | Malicki | Micgiel | Pełczyńska-Nałęcz | Riabchuk Warsaw East European Review Volume VIII/2018 | International Board: Egidijus Aleksandravičius | Vytautas Magnus University Stefano Bianchini | University of Bologna Miroslav Hroch | Charles University Yaroslav Hrytsak | Ukrainian Catholic University Andreas Kappeler | University of Vienna Zbigniew Kruszewski | University of Texas, El Paso Jan Kubik | University College London Panayot Karagyozov | Sofia University Alexey Miller | Russian Academy of Sciences Richard Pipes | Harvard University Mykola Riabchuk | Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Barbara Törnquist-Plewa | Lund University Theodore Weeks | Southern Illinois University Editorial Committee: Jan Malicki | chair of the Committee (director, Centre for East European Studies, University of Warsaw) John S. Micgiel | WEEC Conference Director (Centre for East European Studies, University of Warsaw) Wiktor Ross | secretary of the WEEC Programme Board (Centre for East European Studies, University of Warsaw) Editor-in-Chief Paweł Kowal Deputy Editor-in-Chief John S. Micgiel Assistant Editor Jan Jerzy Malicki Language Editor Christopher Moore ISBN: 978-83-61325-64-2 ISSN: 2299-2421 Copyright © by Studium Europy Wschodniej UW 2018 Typographic design & cover design Jan Jerzy Malicki Layout Jan Malik I. Trump, America and Eastern Europe Warsaw East European Review Editorial Discussion ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • War on Terror and the Law of Armed Conflict: Legal Aspects and Implications
    WAR ON TERROR AND THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT: LEGAL ASPECTS AND IMPLICATIONS Thesis submitted in candidature of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in National Defence University Islamabad Submitted by Muhammad Imran Chaudhry Supervisor Prof. Dr. Pervez Iqbal Cheema 2014 Department of Peace and Conflict Studies National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan Certificate of Completion We hereby recommend that thesis submitted by Muhammad Imran Chaudhry titled “War on Terror and The Law of Armed Conflict: Legal Aspects and Implications” be accepted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Ph.D. in the Discipline of Peace and Conflict Studies. Prof. Dr. Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema (Supervisor) ________________ (External Examiner) Countersigned By: ______________________ ___________________ (Controller of Examinations) (Head of the Department) ii Scholar’s Declaration I, hereby, declare that thesis submitted by me titled “War on Terror and The Law of Armed Conflict: Legal Aspects and Implications” is based on my own original research work and has not been submitted to any other institution for any degree. Date: September 4, 2014 Muhammad Imran Chaudhry (Ph.D. Scholar) iii Supervisor’s Declaration This is to certify that PhD dissertation submitted by Mr. Muhammad Imran Chaudhry (Registration No: NDU-PCS/Ph.D-Tfr/S-09/001(1988-ASC/Ph.D-07) titled “War on Terror and The Law of Armed Conflict: Legal Aspects and Implications” is supervised by me and submitted to meet the requirements for partial fulfillment of the degree of Ph.D. in Peace and Conflict Studies. Date: September 4, 2014 Prof. Dr. Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema Dean Faculty of Contemporary Studies National Defence University Islamabad iv Dedicated to my parents (May they both live long) and my beloved family for their love, endless support and encouragement.
    [Show full text]