DOCSLIB.ORG

Jahresbericht 2012 Der Generaldirektion Der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns Herausgegeben Von: Prof

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jahresbericht 2012 Der Generaldirektion Der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns Herausgegeben Von: Prof Jahresbericht 2012 der Generaldirektion der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns Herausgegeben von: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Haszprunar, Generaldirektor Generaldirektion der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB) Menzinger Straße 71, 80638 München München September 2013 Zusammenstellung und Endredaktion: Dr. Eva Maria Natzer (Generaldirektion) Unterstützung durch: Maria-Luise Kaim (Generaldirektion) Iris Krumböck (Generaldirektion) Katja Henßel (Generaldirektion) Druck: Digitaldruckzentrum, Amalienstrasse, München Inhaltsverzeichnis Bericht des Generaldirektors ...................................................................................................4 Wissenschaftliche Publikationen ................................................................................................6 Drittmittelübersicht ...................................................................................................................42 Organigramm ............................................................................................................................55 Generaldirektion .....................................................................................................................56 Personalvertretung ....................................................................................................................58 Museen Museum Mensch und Natur (MMN) ........................................................................................59 Museum Reich der Kristalle (MRK) ........................................................................................67 Geologisches Museum München (GMM) .................................................................................69 Paläontologisches Museum München (PMM) ..........................................................................71 Jura-Museum Eichstätt (JME) ..................................................................................................74 Naturkunde-Museum Bamberg (NKMB) .................................................................................79 Rieskrater-Museum Nördlingen (RKM) ...................................................................................82 Urwelt-Museum Oberfranken (UMO) ......................................................................................85 Allgemeine Museumswerkstätten (AMW) ...........................................................................89 Botanischer Garten München ................................................................................................91 Staatssammlungen Staatsammlung für Anthropologie und Paläoanatomie (SAPM) ............................................104 Botanische Staatssammlung München (BSM) ....................................................................... 110 Mineralogische Staatssammlung München (MSM) ...............................................................124 Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie (BSPG) ...................................128 Zoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM)..................................................................................148 Bericht des Generaldirektors 2012 war für die Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB) zweifellos gleich in mehrfacher Hinsicht ein ganz besonders aufregendes Jahr. Das Bayerische Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst (StMWFK) hatte bereits 2011 eine Strukturkommission für alle Bayerischen außeruniversitären Forschungsinstitutionen (StrukBy 2013) eingesetzt. Wir hatten dazu Ende 2011 einen detaillierten Bericht über die Leistungen der SNSB in Bezug auf Forschung und Volksbildung erstellt. Dieser Bericht sowie eine zweitägige Begehung durch eine Fachkommission im März 2012 war die Basis für den im Herbst 2012 fertig gestellten Endbericht der Strukturkommission, der für die SNSB ausgesprochen gut ausgefallen ist. Wenn darin von “sehr guten, in Teilen herausragenden” Forschungsleistungen sowie von “überzeugenden, teils hervorragenden” Publikationsleistungen sowie von „höchst motivierten Mitarbeitern“ die Rede ist, bleibt nichts mehr hinzuzufügen. Mein Dank an dieser Stelle an alle Direktor/innen, Museumsleiter/innen und Mitarbeiter/ innen im Gesamtbereich, die zu diesem Erfolg beigetragen habe. Wir freuen uns ebenso darüber, dass sowohl die Evaluierungs-, als auch die (übergeordnete) Strukturkommission den bisher eingeschlagenen Weg der SNSB, mittelfristig Teil der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (WGL) zu werden, grundsätzlich befürworten. Es bleibt nur zu hoffen, dass die Anregungen der Evaluierungs- und Strukturkommission insbesondere in Bezug auf die (nicht zum ersten Mal) als viel zu gering eingestufte Ausstattungs-, Etat- und Personalressourcen der SNSB von den zuständigen Stellen des Trägers ehestmöglich umgesetzt werden. Wie schon im Jahresbericht 2011 angedeutet, kam es im Januar 2012 mit der offiziellen Gründungsveranstaltung des „NaMu-Förderkreises“ zum öffentlichkeitswirksamen Startschuss für die Erweiterung des Museums Mensch und Natur zum „Naturkundemuseum Bayern“. Alle Einzelheiten dazu finden Sie auf www.namu- bayern.de, daher nur die wichtigsten Kennzahlen an dieser Stelle: Die frei gewordene Nachbarfläche des Museums mit über 5.000 m2 Fläche kann genutzt werden, Ziel ist die Erweiterung der Ausstellungsfläche von derzeit 2.200 m2 auf ca. 6.500 m2, der Einbezug unserer Innenstadtmuseen sowie den substanziellen Ausbau der musealen Infrastruktur (Sonderausstellungsflächen, Multimediasaal, Räume für Museumspädagogik, Shop, Gastronomie, etc.) auf international übliche Größenordnungen. Auf der Basis einer phantastischen Sponsoring-Kampagne des NaMu-Förderkreises mit IKH Prinzessin Auguste zur Lippe-Weißenfeld an der Spitze hat der Bayerische Landtag im Dezember 2012 das Projekt prinzipiell bewilligt, derzeit läuft der internationale Architektenwettbewerb dazu an. Wir haben den Ehrgeiz, das NaMu-Bayern zu einem international führenden, mit top-aktueller Thematik und hochmoderner Didaktik und Visualisierung, aber auch gesellschaftspolitisch wirksamen Ausstellungs- und Diskussionsforum für Bio- und Geowissenschaften zu machen, das für alle Alters- und Bildungsschichten Außergewöhnliches zu bieten hat. „Naturkunde als Erlebnis“ ist und bleibt das zentrale Motto dabei. Parallel zu diesem Großereignis, das insbesondere das Museumsteam und die Zentralverwaltung auf Trab hält (das wird noch einige Jahre so bleiben), gibt es aber auch an anderen Stellen reichlich zu tun. Im Botanischen Garten nehmen die Neugestaltung des Eingangsbereiches mit Kassenhaus, die Renovierung des Pförtnerhauses und der Neubau des Versuchsgewächshauses Gestalt an, und wir hoffen, dass zumindest der Großteil dieser Maßnahmen bis zum 100-Jahr-Jubiläum des Botanischen Gartens 2014 abgeschlossen werden können. Im Rieskratermuseum Nördlingen ist mit der (nunmehr definitiven) Bestellung von Prof. Dr. Stefan Hölzl (vorher Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie) als neuen Museumsleiter viel Schwung ausgelöst worden. Er leitet zukünftig auch die direkt angeschlossene Forschungseinheit, das „Zentrum für Rieskrater- und Impaktforschung Nördlingen“ (ZERIN). Diese Erfolge bzw. Zukunftsperspektiven waren nur durch die harmonische Zusammenarbeit mit dem lokalen Träger, der Stadt Nördlingen möglich. Ich Bericht des Generaldirektors danke Herrn Oberbürgermeister Hermann Faul stellvertretend für alle betroffenen Mitarbeiter/innen der Stadt Nördlingen an dieser Stelle ganz herzlich für die hervorragende Zusammenarbeit und das uns entgegen gebrachte Vertrauen. Nichts ist so schwer, wie Erfolge zu wiederholen, aber umso schöner, wenn es gelingt. Wiederum konnten SNSB-Institutionen bzw. Mitarbeiter/innen trotz sehr schwacher Finanzbasis bzw. Eigenmittel substanzielle Drittmittelprojekte einwerben. Dabei haben sich die SNSB insbesondere auf den Gebieten Biodiversitäts- Informatik (Datenbankwesen zur biologischen Vielfalt), DNA-Barcoding (Re-identifizierung von Arten auf molekularer Basis) und molekulare Phylogenie (Stammesgeschichte), Jurassischen Sauriern (vor allem das Saurier-Vogel Übergangsfeld), Meteoritenforschung sowie im Bereich Paläoanatomie und –anthropologie auch international einen hervorragenden Ruf erarbeitet. Sollte es gelingen, dass die SNSB in der Ressourcenlage zu den anderen großen Naturkundemuseen Deutschlands aufschließen können, sind hier auch in der Zukunft herausragende Leistungen zu erwarten. Damit stehen die SNSB im Jahr 2013 nicht ohne Sorge, aber mit umso größeren Erwartungen und hochgradig motiviert. München, im August 2013 Gerhard Haszprunar Generaldirektor der SNSB 5 Wissenschaftliche Publikationen Wissenschaftliche Publikationen Museum Mensch und Natur Wissenschaftliche Publikationen: a) referiert Naser MD, Page TJ, Ng NK, Apel M, Yasser AG, Bishop JM, Ng PKL, Clark PF (2012) Invasive records of Eriocheir hepuensis Dai, 1991 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Grapsoidea: Varunidae): Implications and taxonomic considerations. BioInvasions Records 1(1): 71–86 Naderloo R, Apel M (2012) Leucosiid Crabs of the Genus Hiplyra Galil (2009) Crustacea: Brachyura: Leucosiidae from the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, with Description of a New Species. Zoological Studies 51(2): 248-258 b) nicht referiert oder indiziert keine Angabe Veröffentlichungen externer Personen mit Sammlungsmaterial: keine Angabe Abstracts und Kurzberichte: keine Angabe Wissenschaftliche Vorträge: a) wissenschaftlich, international und auf Einladung Schön D (2012) Paradiesvögel: Gefiederte Top-Models und göttliche Verführer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mechanoreceptors in Early Developmental Stages of the Pycnogonida
    UACE2019 - Conference Proceedings Mechanoreceptors in Early Developmental Stages of the Pycnogonida John A. Fornshell * a a U.S. National Museum of Natural History Department of Invertebrate Zoology Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. USA *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel. (571) 426-2398 ABSTRACT Members of the phylum Arthropoda detect fluid flow and sound/particle vibrations using sensory organs called sensilla. These sensilla detect sound/particle vibrations in the boundary layer. In the present study, archived specimens from the United States National Museum of Natural History were examined in an effort to extend our knowledge of the presence of sensilla on the early post hatching developmental stages, first and second instars, of pycnogonids. In the work presented here we look at three families, four genera and ten species of early post hatching developmental stages of sea spiders. They are Family Ammotheidae, Achelia cuneatis Child, 1999, Ammothea allopodes Fry and Hedgpeth, 1969, Ammothea carolinensis Leach 1814, Ammothea clausi Pfeffer, 1889, Ammothea striata (Möbius, 1902), Family Nymphonidae, Nymphon grossipes (Fabricius, 1780), N. australe Hodgson, 1902, N. charcoti Bouvier, 1911, N. Tenellum (Sars, 1888) and Pycnogonidae, Pentapycnon charcoti Bouvier, 1910. Electron micrograph images of these species were used to identify and describe the sensilla present. Most body organs such as mouthparts, the eye tubercle, appendages and spines are proportionally much smaller in the early post hatching developmental stages compared to their size in the adults, while the sensilla are comparable in size and shape to those found on the adults. In the first instar of Pentapycnon charcoti sensilla are present, but not in the adult.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverfly Newsletter 36
    HOVERFLY NUMBER 36 NEWSLETTER AUGUST 2003 ISSN 1358-5029 This edition is being produced in the wake of the second international symposium which was held in Alicante in June. Alan Stubbs has commented below that Spain was, as expected, too dry in mid-June for many hoverflies to be found. It seems to me that the same comment is true for Britain for much of the present season; although I have had a few productive days this year, on the majority of occasions when I have been in the field hoverfly numbers have proved to be sparse as a result of the hot and very dry conditions. The growth of interest on the subject however continues unabated, as anyone who subscribes to the UK hoverfly email exchange group will testify. Copy for Hoverfly Newsletter No. 37 (which is expected to be issued in February 2004) should be sent to me: David Iliff, Green Willows, Station Road, Woodmancote, Cheltenham, Glos, GL52 9HN, Email address [email protected], to reach me by 20 December. CONTENTS II International Symposium on the Syrphidae 2 Alan Stubbs Alicante in mid June 7 Stuart Ball & Roger Morris News from the Hoverfly Recording Scheme 9 Andrew Grayson Similarity of hovering males of Eristalis horticola to those of Hybomitra distinguenda 12 Andrew Grayson Platycheirus rosarum in Yorkshire during 2002 12 Andrew Grayson A second specimen of Platycheirus amplus from Yorkshire 13 Roy Merritt A possible explanation for simultaneous hovering by Rhingia campestris 13 Roy Merritt Observations on Rhingia campestris 14 Alan Stubbs Hair colour variation in Heringia verrucula 14 Interesting recent records 15 Alan Stubbs Review: A world review of predatory hoverflies 16 1 II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE SYRPHIDAE Following the very successful First International Workshop on the Syrphidae at Stuttgart in July 2001 (reviewed in Hoverfly Newsletter No.
    [Show full text]
  • Chironominae 8.1
    CHIRONOMINAE 8.1 SUBFAMILY CHIRONOMINAE 8 DIAGNOSIS: Antennae 4-8 segmented, rarely reduced. Labrum with S I simple, palmate or plumose; S II simple, apically fringed or plumose; S III simple; S IV normal or sometimes on pedicel. Labral lamellae usually well developed, but reduced or absent in some taxa. Mentum usually with 8-16 well sclerotized teeth; sometimes central teeth or entire mentum pale or poorly sclerotized; rarely teeth fewer than 8 or modified as seta-like projections. Ventromental plates well developed and usually striate, but striae reduced or vestigial in some taxa; beard absent. Prementum without dense brushes of setae. Body usually with anterior and posterior parapods and procerci well developed; setal fringe not present, but sometimes with bifurcate pectinate setae. Penultimate segment sometimes with 1-2 pairs of ventral tubules; antepenultimate segment sometimes with lateral tubules. Anal tubules usually present, reduced in brackish water and marine taxa. NOTESTES: Usually the most abundant subfamily (in terms of individuals and taxa) found on the Coastal Plain of the Southeast. Found in fresh, brackish and salt water (at least one truly marine genus). Most larvae build silken tubes in or on substrate; some mine in plants, dead wood or sediments; some are free- living; some build transportable cases. Many larvae feed by spinning silk catch-nets, allowing them to fill with detritus, etc., and then ingesting the net; some taxa are grazers; some are predacious. Larvae of several taxa (especially Chironomus) have haemoglobin that gives them a red color and the ability to live in low oxygen conditions. With only one exception (Skutzia), at the generic level the larvae of all described (as adults) southeastern Chironominae are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Resolution of Sea Spider Diversification Through Integration Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.31.929612; this version posted February 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Phylogenomic resolution of sea spider diversification through integration of multiple data classes 1Jesús A. Ballesteros†, 1Emily V.W. Setton†, 1Carlos E. Santibáñez López†, 2Claudia P. Arango, 3Georg Brenneis, 4Saskia Brix, 5Esperanza Cano-Sánchez, 6Merai Dandouch, 6Geoffrey F. Dilly, 7Marc P. Eleaume, 1Guilherme Gainett, 8Cyril Gallut, 6Sean McAtee, 6Lauren McIntyre, 9Amy L. Moran, 6Randy Moran, 5Pablo J. López-González, 10Gerhard Scholtz, 6Clay Williamson, 11H. Arthur Woods, 12Ward C. Wheeler, 1Prashant P. Sharma* 1 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA 2 Queensland Museum, Biodiversity Program, Brisbane, Australia 3 Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Cytologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany 4 Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), c/o Biocenter Grindel (CeNak), Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, Hamburg, Germany 5 Biodiversidad y Ecología Acuática, Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain 6 Department of Biology, California State University-Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA 7 Départment Milieux et Peuplements Aquatiques, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France 8 Institut de Systématique, Emvolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Concarneau, France 9 Department of Biology, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA Page 1 of 31 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.31.929612; this version posted February 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Some Species in Tribe Chironomini
    Comments on some species in tribe Chironomini Henk Vallenduuk Prof. Gerbrandystraat 10, 5463BK Veghel, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] During the work of identifying Chironomini collected at various localities in the Netherlands, I made some observations in species interpretation that I think are useful to share with the readers of the Chironomus Newsletter on Chironomidae Research. I hope that in particular ecologists and other users of larval identi- fication keys will find the below comments helpful. Reinterpretation of some species in Chironomus Chironomus macani I obtained males and females from single-reared larvae. Peter Langton identified them as Chironomus (Chaetolabis) macani Freeman, 1948 and confirmed that the male imagines are conspecific with the holo- type of Chironomus (Chaetolabis) macani, held in the Natural History Museum in London, but not with those of Prof. Wolfgang Wülker presently kept in the Zoologische Staatssammlung, München. The Wül- ker’s specimens thus do not belong to the true C. macani and should be renamed (Langton & Vallenduuk 2013). The larvae of both species are morphologically very similar but can be differentiated. Chironomus dorsalis Chironomus (Lobochironomus) longipes Staeger, 1839 was listed as a junior synonym of Chironomus (Lo- bochironomus) dorsalis Meigen, 1818 by Spies & Sæther (2004). However, the name Chironomus (Chi- ronomus) dorsalis Meigen, 1818 has also been used (e.g. Strenzke 1959). Chironomus dorsalis Meigen sensu Strenzke is a misidentification and synonymous withC. alpestris Goetghebuer, 1934 (Sæther & Spies 2013). I reared single larvae of C. dorsalis Meigen and C. alpestris Goetghebuer. It appears that the imago of C. longipes described by Shilova (1980) as Einfeldia does not match with C.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 63–90 (2014)Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland 63 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland Lauri Paasivirta1 1 Ruuhikoskenkatu 17 B 5, FI-24240 Salo, Finland Corresponding author: Lauri Paasivirta ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 10 March 2014 | Accepted 26 August 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/F3343ED1-AE2C-43B4-9BA1-029B5EC32763 Citation: Paasivirta L (2014) Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 63–90. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 Abstract A checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Finland, Chironomidae, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction There are supposedly at least 15 000 species of chironomid midges in the world (Armitage et al. 1995, but see Pape et al. 2011) making it the largest family among the aquatic insects. The European chironomid fauna consists of 1262 species (Sæther and Spies 2013). In Finland, 780 species can be found, of which 37 are still undescribed (Paasivirta 2012). The species checklist written by B. Lindeberg on 23.10.1979 (Hackman 1980) included 409 chironomid species. Twenty of those species have been removed from the checklist due to various reasons. The total number of species increased in the 1980s to 570, mainly due to the identification work by me and J. Tuiskunen (Bergman and Jansson 1983, Tuiskunen and Lindeberg 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Flowering Phenology and Anthophilous Insect Community at a Threatened Natural Lowland Marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan
    Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect community at a Title threatened natural lowland marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan Author(s) KATO, Makoto; MIURA, Reiichi Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto Citation University (1996), 29(1): 1 Issue Date 1996-03-31 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/156114 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Contr. biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., Vol. 29, pp. 1-48, Pl. 1 Issued 31 March 1996 Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect community at a threatened natural lowland marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan Makoto KATo and Reiichi MiuRA ABSTRACT Nakaikemi marsh, located in Fukui Prefecture, is one of only a few natural lowland marshlands left in westem Japan, and harbors many endangered marsh plants and animals. Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect communities on 64 plant species of 35 families were studied in the marsh in 1994-95. A total of 936 individuals of 215 species in eight orders of Insecta were collected on flowers from mid April to mid October, The anthophilous insect community was characterized by dominance of Diptera (58 9e of individuals) and relative paucity of Hymenoptera (26 9o), Hemiptera (6 9e), Lepidoptera (5 9e), and Coleoptera (5 9o), Syrphidae was the most abundant family and probably the most important pollination agents. Bee community was characterized by dominance of an aboveground nesting bee genus, Hylaeus (Colletidae), the most abundant species of which was a minute, rare little-recorded species. Cluster analysis on fiower-visiting insect spectra grouped 64 plant species into seven clusters, which were respectively characterized by dominance of small or large bees (18 spp.), syrphid fiies (13 spp.), Calyptrate and other flies (11 spp.), wasps and middle-sized bees (8 spp.), Lepidoptera (2 spp.), Coleoptera (1 sp.) and a mixture of these various insects (11 spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Evolutionary Transitions in Changing Photic Environments
    bs_bs_banner Austral Entomology (2017) 56,23–46 Review Consequences of evolutionary transitions in changing photic environments Simon M Tierney,1* Markus Friedrich,2,3 William F Humphreys,1,4,5 Therésa M Jones,6 Eric J Warrant7 and William T Wcislo8 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, 5047 Gullen Mall, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. 3Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, 540 East Canfield Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. 4Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia. 5School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia. 6Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. 7Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden. 8Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Republic of Panamá. Abstract Light represents one of the most reliable environmental cues in the biological world. In this review we focus on the evolutionary consequences to changes in organismal photic environments, with a specific focus on the class Insecta. Particular emphasis is placed on transitional forms that can be used to track the evolution from (1) diurnal to nocturnal (dim-light) or (2) surface to subterranean (aphotic) environments, as well as (3) the ecological encroachment of anthropomorphic light on nocturnal habitats (artificial light at night). We explore the influence of the light environment in an integrated manner, highlighting the connections between phenotypic adaptations (behaviour, morphology, neurology and endocrinology), molecular genetics and their combined influence on organismal fitness.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Astyanax Final Version.Indd
    Vertebrate Zoology 59 (1) 2009 31 31 – 40 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 1864-5755, 29.05.2009 Osteology of the African annual killifi sh genus Callopanchax (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Nothobranchiidae) and phylogenetic implications WILSON J. E. M. COSTA Laboratório de Ictiologia Geral e Aplicada, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21944-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil E-mail: wcosta(at)acd.ufrj.br Received on May 5, 2008, accepted on October 6, 2008. Published online at www.vertebrate-zoology.de on May 15, 2009. > Abstract Osteological structures of Callopanchax are fi rst described and illustrated. Twenty-six characters derived from comparisons of osseous structures among some aplocheiloid fi shes provided evidence supporting hypotheses of relationships among three western African genera (Callopanchax, Scriptaphyosemion and Archiaphyosemion), as proposed in recent molecular analysis. The clade comprising Callopanchax, Scriptaphyosemion and Archiaphyosemion is supported by a laterally displaced antero-proximal process of the fourth ceratobranchial. The sister group relationship between Callopanchax and Scriptaphyosemion is supported by a constriction on the posterior portion of the parasphenoid, an anterior expansion of the hyomandibula, a rectangular basihyal cartilage, an anterior pointed process on the fi rst vertebra, and a long ventrally directed hemal prezygapophysis on the preural centrum 2. Monophyly of Callopanchax is supported by a convexity on the dorsal margin of the opercle, a long interarcual cartilage, and long neural prezygapophyses on the anterior caudal vertebrae. > Key words Killifi shes, Callopanchax, Africa, Osteology, Annual fi shes. Introduction COSTA, 1998a, 2004) and among genera and species of the Rivulidae (e. g., COSTA, 1998b, 2005, 2006a, b).
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Nepal's Insects
    An Inventory of Nepal's Insects Volume III (Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera & Diptera) V. K. Thapa An Inventory of Nepal's Insects Volume III (Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera& Diptera) V.K. Thapa IUCN-The World Conservation Union 2000 Published by: IUCN Nepal Copyright: 2000. IUCN Nepal The role of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) in supporting the IUCN Nepal is gratefully acknowledged. The material in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for education or non-profit uses, without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. IUCN Nepal would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication, which uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purposes without prior written permission of IUCN Nepal. Citation: Thapa, V.K., 2000. An Inventory of Nepal's Insects, Vol. III. IUCN Nepal, Kathmandu, xi + 475 pp. Data Processing and Design: Rabin Shrestha and Kanhaiya L. Shrestha Cover Art: From left to right: Shield bug ( Poecilocoris nepalensis), June beetle (Popilla nasuta) and Ichneumon wasp (Ichneumonidae) respectively. Source: Ms. Astrid Bjornsen, Insects of Nepal's Mid Hills poster, IUCN Nepal. ISBN: 92-9144-049 -3 Available from: IUCN Nepal P.O. Box 3923 Kathmandu, Nepal IUCN Nepal Biodiversity Publication Series aims to publish scientific information on biodiversity wealth of Nepal. Publication will appear as and when information are available and ready to publish. List of publications thus far: Series 1: An Inventory of Nepal's Insects, Vol. I. Series 2: The Rattans of Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Ecology in Southwestern Zimbabwe, with Emphasis on the Impact of Holistic Planned Grazing Practices Sicelo Sebata Thesis
    Spider ecology in southwestern Zimbabwe, with emphasis on the impact of holistic planned grazing practices Sicelo Sebata Thesis submitted in satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in the Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State January 2020 Supervisors Prof. Charles R. Haddad (PhD): Associate Professor: Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa. Prof. Stefan H. Foord (PhD): Professor: Department of Zoology, School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa. Dr. Moira J FitzPatrick (PhD): Regional Director: Natural History Museums of Zimbabwe, cnr Park Road and Leopold Takawira Avenue, Centenary Park Suburbs, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. i STUDENT DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby assert that the work included in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not beforehand in its totality or in part submitted it at any university for a degree. I also relinquish copyright of the thesis in favour of the University of the Free State. S. Sebata 31 January 2020 ii SUPERVISOR DECLARATION iii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to all the spiders that lost their lives in the name of Science. iv ABSTRACT The current information on Zimbabwean spiders is fairly poor and is mostly restricted to taxonomic descriptions, while their ecology remains largely unknown. While taxonomic studies are very important, as many species are becoming extinct before they are described, a focus on the ecology of spiders is also essential, as it helps with addressing vital questions such as the effect of anthropogenic activities on spider fauna.
    [Show full text]