Nomifensine in Parkinsonism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nomifensine in Parkinsonism J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.39.12.1219 on 1 December 1976. Downloaded from Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1976, 39, 1219-1221 Nomifensine in Parkinsonism P. F. TEYCHENNE', D. M. PARK, L. J. FINDLEY, F. CLIFFORD ROSE, AND D. B. CALNE From the Departments ofNeurology, Charing Cross Hospital, the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, and the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA SYNOPSIS Nomifensine, a tetrahydroisoquinoline antidepressant which facilitates dopaminergic and noradrenergic transmission, was studied in 28 Parkinsonism patients most of whom were also receiving conventional medications. Double-blind evaluations revealed a moderate therapeutic action at a mean dose level of 150 mg daily. Adverse reactions were encountered, similar to those induced by levodopa. by guest. Protected copyright. Nomifensine (8-amino-2-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4- taking carbidopa and five receiving anticholinergic tetrahydroisoquinoline) is a drug currently being agents); two patients were on anticholinergics alone, evaluated as an antidepressant. It inhibits the re- and two were not taking any drugs. uptake of noradrenaline in the same way as tricyclic antidepressants, but unlike tricyclics it also decreases DESIGN the reuptake of dopamine and has a direct agonist The study was performed in three consecutive stages. effect on dopaminergic receptors (Hoffmann, 1973; (1) Nomifensine was gradually introduced, building Gerhards et al., 1974; Schacht and Heptner, 1974; up to maximum tolerated dosage over a period of two Costall et al., 1975; Costall and Naylor, 1975). Nomi- weeks; (2) when optimum dose levels were obtained, fensine should therefore potentiate both noradren- treatment was continued for between six and 15 ergic and dopaminergic synaptic transmission. There weeks; (3) a placebo was substituted for nomifensine is evidence, deriving from animal studies, which over the final six weeks. suggests that optimal anti-Parkinsonism therapy The initial dose of nomifensine varied between 25 should augment both noradrenergic and dopamin- and 50 mg daily. No patient received more than an ergic transmission (Hornykiewicz, 1973); for this arbitrarily set upper limit, 200 mg. In five subjects, reason, we have studied the action of nomifensine in because of transient unwanted effects, the dose of Parkinsonism. nomifensine was reduced by 25 % of their maximum level. METHODS The major adverse effect was dyskinesia. In four patients this was controlled by a reduction in levodopa http://jnnp.bmj.com/ PATIENTS from a mean of3.63 g (range 4.5 to 3) to a mean of2.5 g Twenty-eight patients (14 male, 14 female) with (range 3.5 to 1.5) and in two subjects by a reduction of idiopathic Parkinsonism and one patient with post- Sinemet (250 mg levodopa combined with 25 mg encephalitic Parkinsonism were studied. Informed carbidopa) from an average of 3.75 tablets (range 5 to consent was obtained from all subjects, who were 2.5) to an average of two (range 3 to 1). Other con- warned that they might experience a temporary comitant therapy was maintained without alteration deterioration at some stage during the trial. Twenty throughout the study. patients (13 men, seven women) of mean age 68 years on September 26, 2021 (range 55 to 83) completed the study. Of these, 16 EVALUATIONS were on maximum tolerated doses of levodopa (eight The method for evaluation of physical signs and functional disability was that used previously (Calne 'Address for reprints: P. F. Teychenne, Bldg. 10, Rm. 6D-20 National et al., 1974), scores ranging from 0 (representing Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014, USA. normality) to 4 (maximum deficit). Timed tests were (Accepted 19 August 1976.) employed for walking, writing, repetitively opposing 1219 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.39.12.1219 on 1 December 1976. Downloaded from 1220 P. F. Teychenne, D. M. Park, L. J. Findley, F. Clifford Rose, and D. B. Calne thumb to fingers in each hand, and alternate full 37.5- finger extension and flexion in each hand. These assessments were made on outpatients, every two weeks, by the same evaluator. The patient's weight . was measured at each visit, an electrocardiogram was F recorded before and during the phase of treatment with active drug, and routine haematological and bio- 30.0 ~- I chemical tests were performed every two weeks, with- S out detection of any significant abnormality. 0 0 RESULTS Nineteen of the 20 patients completed three placebo evaluations. One patient sustained a Colles fracture 0 after only one placebo assessment; administration of 22.5 - I placebo was not continued in this patient. The mean I 0 ULJ S maximum tolerated dose of nomifensine was 150 mg C) 0 daily (range 75-200). C- S The results of the last three evaluations on nomi- z 0 fensine were compared with the three evaluations on C-) . placebo. When placebo was substituted for active S 0 by guest. Protected copyright. drug, deterioration of physical signs and functional 15.0 - disability were significant (Fig. 1) at the 0.1 % level (paired t test). Of the physical signs, tremor and facial S expression improved most during treatment with 0 nomifensine, but there was also some amelioration of S rigidity, speech disorder, balance, finger dexterity, S gait, posture, and drooling ofsaliva. Ofthe functional 7.5 F disabilities, dressing, washing, eating, and writing all 0 improved. All timed tests showed a beneficial trend during treatment with nomifensine, for finger flexion (Fig. 2) the improvement was significant at the 1 % level (paired t test). No statistical difference was found in either clinical scoring or timed tests between the patients receiving O L nomifensine for six, eight, 10, 12, 14 or 15 weeks. NOMIFENSINE PLACEBO Although all clinical features which were evaluated FIG. 1 Total clinical deficit in each patient during displayed some improvement during the phase of clinical nomifensine therapy, gains were moderate and nomifensine and placebo therapy (arbitrary dramatic individual improvements were not seen. scorefor tremor, rigidity, dysarthria,facial expression, The frequency of unwanted effects, in the 19 rising from chair, balance, finger dexterity, drooling, patients who completed the study, is shown in the sweating, gait, posture, dressing, washing, eating, writing -0=normal; 4=maximaldisability). Average http://jnnp.bmj.com/ Table. All adverse reactions were dose dependent and intervals. the drug was well tolerated once optimum mainten- ofthree separate evaluations atfortnightly ance levels of intake were established. Of the nine patients omitted from the analysis, one failed to attend regularly and another had a con- DISCUSSION tinuing depressive illness, resistant to nomifensine. The other seven patients were withdrawn because of Tricyclic antidepressants, theoretically feasible agents the development of involuntary movements; three of to treat Parkinsonism, have not achieved a prominent these were not receiving levodopa. Additional adverse place in therapy. They act predominantly on noradre- on September 26, 2021 effects in the excluded group included insomnia nergic and serotonergic terminals by inhibiting the (two), confusion (two) and akathisia, headache, reuptake ofnoradrenaline and serotonin respectively. vertigo, faintness, emesis or constipation (one patient Nomifensine, a tetrahydroisoquinoline with anti- each). Some patients experienced more than one depressant properties, is of interest in Parkinsonism unwanted effect, but all the adverse reactions were because it also inhibits the reuptake of dopamine and abolished by stopping nomifensine. activates dopaminergic receptors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.39.12.1219 on 1 December 1976. Downloaded from Nomifensine in Parkinsonism 1221 TABLE 20 r 0 DOSE DEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTIONS ENCOUNTERED IN THE 19 PATIENTS WHO COMPLETED THE STUDY Number of Adverse reactions patients affected 0 Dyskinesia 10 '5 H Emesis 4 I Insomnia 4 S Sedation 3 0 0 Constipation 3 0 Dry mouth 1 Light-headedness I 0 S Hallucinations I Nightmares I 0 Paraesthesiae 1 'On-off' phenomena I 10 F 0 0 0 toxicity of nomifensine as a therapeutic agent for 0 S Parkinsonism. by guest. Protected copyright. We are grateful to Dr Moghaddasi, Miss A. Bryant, 0 5 Miss E. Albutt, and Miss E. Mitchell for their help in the organisation of the trial. We wish to thank Mrs P. Barnicoat for her assistance in preparing the manu- script. Nomifensine was kindly supplied by Hoechst Pharmaceuticals. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council. 0 L REFERENCES NOMIFENSINE PLACEBO Calne, D. B., Teychenne, P. F., Claveria, L. E., Eastman, FIG. 2 Mean of the number of complete R., Greenacre, J. K., and Petrie, A. (1974). Bromo- flexion- criptine in parkinsonism. British Medical Journal, 4, extension movements offingers performed with both 442-444. hands in 10 seconds. Average ofthree separate evalua- Costall, B., Kelly, D. M., and Naylor, R. J. (1975). Nomi- tions at fortnightly intervals. fensine: a potent dopaminergic agonist ofantiparkinson potential. Psychopharmacologia, 41, 153-164. Costall, B., and Naylor, R. J. (1975). Actions of dopa- Our results suggest that nomifensine is effective in minergic agonists on motor function. In Advances in the treatment of Parkinsonism. Neurology, vol. 9, pp. 285-297. Edited by D. B. Calne, The frequency of adverse effects is similar to those T. N. Chase,
Recommended publications
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Characterizations of H05, a Novel Potent Serotonin And
    JPET/2018/248351 Title: Pharmacological characterization of (3-(benzo[d][1,3] dioxol-4-yloxy) -3-(4-fluorophenyl)-N, N-dimethylpropan-1-amine (H05), a novel serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor with moderate 5-HT2A antagonist activity for the treatment of depression Authors: Xiangqing Xu, Yaqin Wei, Qiang Guo, Song Zhao, Zhiqiang Liu, Ting Xiao, Yani Liu, Yinli Qiu, Yuanyuan Hou, Guisen Zhang and KeWei Wang Affiliations: Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University , Beijing, China (X.X., T.X., K.W.W.); School of pharmacy, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China (Y.W.); Institute of pharmaceutical research, Jiangsu Nhwa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China (Q.G., S.Z., Z.L., Y.Q., Y.H., G.Z.); Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China (Y.L., K.W.W.) 1 Running title page Running title: A novel SNRI with 5-HT2A antagonist activity for treatment of depression Corresponding author: KeWei Wang Address: No. 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. Tel: 86•10•82805605; E•mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Number of text pages: 57 Number of tables: 3 Number of figures: 7 Number of references: 71 Words in Abstract: 248 Words in Introduction: 712 Words in Discussion:1357 Abbreviations: ADs: antidepressants; SSRIs: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; NRIs: norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SNRIs: serotonin and norepinephrine
    [Show full text]
  • Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
    Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences Series Editors Mark A. Geyer, La Jolla, CA, USA Bart A. Ellenbroek, Wellington, New Zealand Charles A. Marsden, Nottingham, UK For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/7854 About this Series Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences provides critical and comprehensive discussions of the most significant areas of behavioral neuroscience research, written by leading international authorities. Each volume offers an informative and contemporary account of its subject, making it an unrivalled reference source. Titles in this series are available in both print and electronic formats. With the development of new methodologies for brain imaging, genetic and genomic analyses, molecular engineering of mutant animals, novel routes for drug delivery, and sophisticated cross-species behavioral assessments, it is now possible to study behavior relevant to psychiatric and neurological diseases and disorders on the physiological level. The Behavioral Neurosciences series focuses on ‘‘translational medicine’’ and cutting-edge technologies. Preclinical and clinical trials for the development of new diagostics and therapeutics as well as prevention efforts are covered whenever possible. Cameron S. Carter • Jeffrey W. Dalley Editors Brain Imaging in Behavioral Neuroscience 123 Editors Cameron S. Carter Jeffrey W. Dalley Imaging Research Center Department of Experimental Psychology Center for Neuroscience University of Cambridge University of California at Davis Downing Site Sacramento, CA 95817 Cambridge CB2 3EB USA UK ISSN 1866-3370 ISSN 1866-3389 (electronic) ISBN 978-3-642-28710-7 ISBN 978-3-642-28711-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-28711-4 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012938202 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Lactose Intolerance and Health: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, No
    Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 192 Lactose Intolerance and Health Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10064-I Prepared by: Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, Minneapolis, MN Investigators Timothy J. Wilt, M.D., M.P.H. Aasma Shaukat, M.D., M.P.H. Tatyana Shamliyan, M.D., M.S. Brent C. Taylor, Ph.D., M.P.H. Roderick MacDonald, M.S. James Tacklind, B.S. Indulis Rutks, B.S. Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg, M.D. Robert L. Kane, M.D. Michael Levitt, M.D. AHRQ Publication No. 10-E004 February 2010 This report is based on research conducted by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10064-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services. This report is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for clinical judgment. This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease
    Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease Philippe Huot,1,2,3 Susan H. Fox,1,2 and Jonathan M. Brotchie1 1 Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8 2Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399BathurstStreet,Toronto,ON,CanadaM5T2S8 3Department of Pharmacology and Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, UniversitedeMontr´ eal´ and Centre Hospitalier de l’UniversitedeMontr´ eal,´ Montreal,´ QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan M. Brotchie; [email protected] Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 26 December 2014 Academic Editor: Maral M. Mouradian Copyright © 2015 Philippe Huot et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The motor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are secondary to a dopamine deficiency in the striatum. However, the degenerative process in PD is not limited to the dopaminergic system and also affects serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons. Because they can increase monoamine levels throughout the brain, monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MAUIs) represent potential therapeutic agents in PD. However, they are seldom used in clinical practice other than as antidepressants and wake-promoting agents. This review
    [Show full text]
  • Methamphetamine-Induced Degeneration of Dopaminergic Neurons Involves Autophagy and Upregulation of Dopamine Synthesis
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 15, 2002, 22(20):8951–8960 Methamphetamine-Induced Degeneration of Dopaminergic Neurons Involves Autophagy and Upregulation of Dopamine Synthesis Kristin E. Larsen,1 Edward A. Fon,2 Teresa G. Hastings,3 Robert H. Edwards,4 and David Sulzer1 1Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Columbia University, and Department of Neuroscience, New York Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York 10032, 2Centre for Neuronal Survival, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada, 3Departments of Neuroscience and Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, and 4Departments of Neurology and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143 Methamphetamine (METH) selectively injures the neurites of pression. METH administration also promoted the synthesis of dopamine (DA) neurons, generally without inducing cell death. It DA via upregulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity, resulting in has been proposed that METH-induced redistribution of DA an elevation of cytosolic DA even in the absence of vesicular from the vesicular storage pool to the cytoplasm, where DA can sequestration. Electron microscopy and fluorescent labeling oxidize to produce quinones and additional reactive oxygen confirmed that METH promoted the formation of autophagic species, may account for this selective neurotoxicity. To test granules, particularly in neuronal varicosities and, ultimately, this hypothesis, we used mice heterozygous (ϩ/Ϫ) or homozy- within cell bodies of dopaminergic neurons. Therefore, we pro- gous (Ϫ/Ϫ) for the brain vesicular monoamine uptake trans- pose that METH neurotoxicity results from the induction of a porter VMAT2, which mediates the accumulation of cytosolic specific cellular pathway that is activated when DA cannot be DA into synaptic vesicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoamine Transporter Inhibitors and Norepinephrine Reduce Dopamine-Dependent Iron Toxicity in Cells Derived from the Substantia Nigra
    Monoamine transporter inhibitors and norepinephrine reduce dopamine-dependent iron toxicity in cells derived from the substantia nigra Irmgard Paris,*,1 Pedro Martinez-Alvarado,*,1 Carolina Perez-Pastene,* Marcelo N. N. Vieira,§ Claudio Olea-Azar, Rita Raisman-Vozari,à Sergio Cardenas,* Rebeca Graumann,* Pablo Caviedes* and Juan Segura-Aguilar* *Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Santiago, Chile Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile àINSERM U289, Neurologie et Therapeutique Experimentale, Paris, France §Departamento de Bioquimica Medica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Abstract 100 lM FeCl3 alone or complexed with dopamine. However, The role of dopamine in iron uptake into catecholaminergic 100 lM Fe(III)–dopamine in the presence of 100 lM dic- neurons, and dopamine oxidation to aminochrome and its oumarol, an inhibitor of DT-diaphorase, induced toxicity one-electron reduction in iron-mediated neurotoxicity, was (44% cell death; p < 0.001), which was inhibited by 2 lM studied in RCSN-3 cells, which express both tyrosine nomifensine, 30 lM reboxetine and 2 mM norepinephrine. hydroxylase and monoamine transporters. The mean ± SD The neuroprotective action of norepinephrine can be 59 3+ uptake of 100 lM FeCl3 in RCSN-3 cells was 25 ± 4 pmol explained by (1) its ability to form complexes with Fe , (2) per min per mg, which increased to 28 ± 8 pmol per min per the uptake of Fe–norepinephrine complex via the norepi- mg when complexed with dopamine (Fe(III)–dopamine). nephrine transporter and (3) lack of toxicity of the Fe–nor- This uptake was inhibited by 2 lM nomifensine (43% epinephrine complex even when DT-diaphorase is inhibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E-3: Complete Search Strategy
    1 Appendix e-3: Complete search strategy The authors initially performed database searches for all studies published in regard to cognitive and emotional disorders in multiple sclerosis. The final guideline focuses solely on emotional disorders. The search strategy presents all results pertaining to emotional disorders unless a search included data on both cognitive and emotional disorders with respect to a particular topic (e.g., interventions). Medline search strategy While the staff of HealthSearch makes every effort to ensure that the information gathered is accurate and up-to-date, HealthSearch disclaims any warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information or its fitness for a particular purpose. HealthSearch provides information from public sources both in electronic and print formats and does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or reliability. The information provided is only for the use of the Client and no liability is accepted by HealthSearch to third parties. Database: Ovid MEDLINE(R) <1950 to February Week 1 2007> Search Strategy: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 multiple sclerosis/ or multiple sclerosis, chronic progressive/ or multiple sclerosis, relapsing- remitting/ or neuromyelitis optica/ (28475) 2 Demyelinating Diseases/ (7686) 3 clinically isolated syndrome.mp. (67) 4 first demyelinating event.mp. (23) 5 multiple sclerosis.mp. (33263) 6 Demyelinating Disease:.mp. (9613) 7 disseminated sclerosis.mp. (491) 8 or/1-7 (40459) 9 affective symptoms/ (8380) 10 emotions/ or affect/ or irritable mood/ or exp anxiety/ (70058) 11 mood disorders/ or affective disorders, psychotic/ or bipolar disorder/ or cyclothymic disorder/ or depressive disorder/ or depression, postpartum/ or depressive disorder, major/ or dysthymic disorder/ or seasonal affective disorder/ (73853) 12 mood swing:.mp.
    [Show full text]
  • Upon Psychomotor Activity and Intracranial Self-Stimulation in the Rat
    Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, Vol. 7, pp. 269--272. Copyright © 1977 by ANKHO International Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. Effects of Nomifensine (HOE 984) Upon Psychomotor Activity and Intracranial Self-Stimulation in the Rat R. J. KATZ, G. BALDRIGHI AND B. J. CARROLL Mental Health Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry The University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, M! 48109 (Received 9 April 1977) KATZ, R. J., G. BALDRIGH1 AND B. J. CARROLL. Effects of nomifensine (HOE 984) upon psychomotor activity and intracranial self-stimulation in the rat. PHARMAC. BIOCHEM. BEHAV. 7(3) 269-272, 1977. - The effects of nomifensine maleate (HOE 984) were evaluated using two behavioral tasks. The drug produced dose related increases in both psychomotor activity and operant responding for brain stimulation reward. These results may point to possible psychostimulant properties for the drug. Activity Nomifensine Psychomotor Self stimulation Stimulant NOMIFENSINE (HOE 984; 8 amino-2-methyl-4-phenyl-1, bedding of fresh pine chips. Cages were located upon field 2, 3, 4 tetrahydroisoquinoline) is an experimental thymo- sensitive activity minotirs (Stoelting SA 1566, 1562, 1570) leptic drug with potential clinical utility and a number of operating upon a selective mode for the detection of gross unusual pharmacological properties [2, 8, 9, 11, 14]. body movement. Four monitors calibrated to within 5% of Unlike many antidepressant drugs (e.g., imipramine and each other were in use at a given time. desipramine [4]) which depress motor activity at least Drugs. Nomifensine hydrogen maleate was injected as a certain dosages of nomifensine may in fact increase motor suspension in 0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg dosages.
    [Show full text]
  • Relevance of Norepinephrine–Dopamine Interactions in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder Mostafa El Mansari, Bruno P
    REVIEW Relevance of Norepinephrine–Dopamine Interactions in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder Mostafa El Mansari, Bruno P. Guiard, Olga Chernoloz, Ramez Ghanbari, Noam Katz & Pierre Blier University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, 1145 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Z 7K4 Keywords Central dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems play essential roles in con- Dopamine; Major depressive disorder; trolling several forebrain functions. Consequently, perturbations of these neu- Norepinephrine; Serotonin. rotransmissions may contribute to the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. For many years, there was a focus on the serotonin (5-HT) system Correspondence: Mostafa El Mansari, Ph.D., University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health because of the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the Research, Room 7407, 1145 Carling Avenue, most prescribed antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder Ottawa ON K1Z 7K4, Canada. (MDD). Given the interconnectivity within the monoaminergic network, any Tel.: 613-722-6521, ext 6179; action on one system may reverberate in the other systems. Analysis of this Fax: 613-761-3610; network and its dysfunctions suggests that drugs with selective or multiple E-mail: [email protected] modes of action on dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) may have ro- bust therapeutic effects. This review focuses on NE-DA interactions as demon- strated in electrophysiological and neurochemical studies, as well as on the doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00146.x mechanisms of action of agents with either selective or dual actions on DA and NE. Understanding the mode of action of drugs targeting these catecholamin- ergic neurotransmitters can improve their utilization in monotherapy and in Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance combination with other compounds particularly the SSRIs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Amfonelic Acid and Some Other Central Stimulants on Mouse Striatal Tyramine, Dopamine and Homovanillic Acid A.V
    Br. J. Pharmac. (1982), 77,511-515 THE EFFECTS OF AMFONELIC ACID AND SOME OTHER CENTRAL STIMULANTS ON MOUSE STRIATAL TYRAMINE, DOPAMINE AND HOMOVANILLIC ACID A.V. JUORIO Psychiatric Research Division, University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N OXO, Canada 1 The concentrations ofp- and m-tyramine, dopamine and homovanillic acid were measured in the mouse striatum following the subcutaneous administration of amfonelic acid, (+)-amphetamine or nomifensine. 2 The administration of 2.5-25 mg/kg of amfonelic acid produced a reduction in p-tyramine that lasted at least 8 h. m-Tyramine was significantly increased and this was observed between 2 and 24 h after drug treatment. The levels of homovanillic acid were increased within 4 h after amfonelic acid administration. 3 (+)-Amphetamine treatment (5 mg/kg) produced a reduction in p-tyramine observed up to 4 h after its administration and no significant changes in m-tyramine. 4 The administration of 10 mg/kg of nomifensine produced no significant changes in p-tyramine, m-tyramine or homovanillic acid. By increasing the dose to 20 mg/kg, nomifensine produced an increase in p-tyramine and homovanillic acid. 5 The present results support the view that amfonelic acid and (+)-amphetamine would respec- tively release granular or newly synthesized dopamine, both actions being accompanied by an increase in tyrosine hydroxylase activity and dopamine turnover which in turn reduces p-tyramine but produces no change or an increase in m-tyramine. 6 The effects of nomifensine were observed after the administration of a relatively high dose (20 mg/kg), that was lethal to some mice (about 20%, at 2 h), and more likely to possess unspecific actions.
    [Show full text]