Report to County Board of Supervisors on Wildfire Risk and Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report to County Board of Supervisors on Wildfire Risk and Response Report to Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors WILDFIRE RISK & RESPONSE April 2019 ATTACHMENT 3 County of Santa Clara Fire Department BACKGROUND At the December 4, 2018 Board of Supervisors meeting, a board referral was given to the County Fire Chief due to the implications of the huge increase in wildland fires in the region and the potential risks to Santa Clara County. Specifically, the referral requested information on tools, technology, strategies, policies, procedures and resources available in the County as well as what additional resources are needed to protect our community. The Santa Clara County Fire Department (Central Fire Protection District) Fire Chief was asked to coordinate with the other fire districts (Los Altos Hills and South Santa Clara County), the Roads and Airports department, and County Parks and report back to the Board no later than April, 2019. The Board’s request came shortly after the Camp fire destroyed the communities of Concow, Magalia, and Paradise in Butte County, ending the deadliest and most destructive year of wildland fires in California history. More than 20,000 structures were destroyed, over 1.9 million acres burned, and 98 people were killed. The Camp fire alone is estimated to have cost over $120 million to contain1 and burned more than 18,000 structures, becoming California’s most destructive wildland fire ever. This is remarkable considering just 13- months prior the Tubbs fire in Sonoma County had been the most destructive fire in California history burning 5,636 structures and killing 22 people. These fires fueled by dense, dry vegetation and warmer, drier weather have unfortunately become increasingly more common over the last several years and have resulted in rising suppression costs. In fact, the last ten fire seasons have produced 7 of California’s most destructive wildland fires (Table 1). Table 1. Most Destructive California Wildland Fires Incident Acres Structures Deaths Date Camp Fire 153,336 18,804 86 Nov 2018 Tubbs 36,807 5,636 22 Oct 2017 Tunnel 1,600 2,900 25 Oct 1991 Cedar 273,246 2,820 15 Oct 2003 Valley 76,067 1,955 4 Sep 2015 Witch 197,990 1,650 2 Oct 2007 1 Camp Fire, Incident Status Summary (ICS-209), November 25, 2018 Santa Clara County Fire Department Page 2 of 17 Wildfire Risk & Response County of Santa Clara Fire Department Woolsey 96,949 1,643 2 Nov 2018 Carr 229,651 1,604 8 Jul 2018 Nuns 54,382 1,355 3 Oct 2017 Thomas 281,893 1,063 2 Dec 2017 Source: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection It is clear we are seeing unprecedented fire behavior and destruction and need to take immediate action to reduce our risk and ensure Santa Clara County can respond effectively to the, “new normal.” To do this I recommend establishing a County Wildland Fire program, adopting the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) annexes 1, 2, 4, 13, 18, and approval of a 2- year workplan for the newly established Wildland Fire Program with a focus on operationalizing the CWPP. A Wildland Fire Program within the County Fire Marshal’s Office staffed with a program manager/interagency coordinator, a pre-fire planner and a Senior Deputy Fire Marshal will serve as the foundation of the workplan and provide countywide coordination amongst the many stakeholders. In addition, the program will immediately develop a best practices report summarizing the county level wildland fire preparedness efforts in other counties (Alameda, Marin, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties) to ensure our long-term strategy is based on the combined experience of our partners throughout the State. Specific recommendations include: • The creation of a County Wildland Fire Program within the County Fire Marshal’s Office to coordinate a unified approach to wildland fire risk reduction countywide, including program funding out of the general fund and workplan authorization (Attachment B – Workplan). • Board adoption of all Community Wildfire Protection Plan Annexes (Attachment C – CWPP incl. Annex 1, 2, 4, 13, 18) over which the County has authority. • Funding for one Type 6 fire engine and one brush masticator tractor to accelerate implementation of Department of Parks and Recreation hazardous fuels reduction projects. • Establish a policy for effective, integrated roadside vegetation management (fire fuel reduction) for County roadways, including chemical herbicide application and mowing in areas designated as high or very high fire hazard severity zones as defined by the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and authorize the administration to Santa Clara County Fire Department Page 3 of 17 Wildfire Risk & Response County of Santa Clara Fire Department provide exemptions for the use of effective, economical pre- and post-emergent herbicide on roads in the designated high fire areas. Funding these four recommendations would have a FY2019-20 impact to the general fund of $1,211,511 recurring and $437,500 in one-time funds (Attachment D, Detailed Costs). The detailed wildland fire program within this report, if implemented, will have a positive impact on seniors and children to the extent that improving wildland fire preparedness and response will enhance public safety. Seniors are often amongst the most vulnerable populations in our communities, particularly during emergencies that require evacuations. The “New Normal” Unfortunately, recent climate reports forecast our risk to wildland fire is increasing. According to the recently published, California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment: California’s Changing Climate 2018 (Attachment E), “the science is highly certain that California will continue to warm and experience greater impacts from climate change in the future.” The report forecasts the area burned by wildland fire will increase as a result, and the last few fire seasons lend support to the prediction. Warmer, drier weather and dense vegetation adjacent to our communities are magnifying our historic wildland fire risk. This phenomenon can best be illustrated in the equation shown below. FUEL + WEATHER + WILDLAND URBAN INTERACE = DESTRUCTIVE FIRES Within the equation, historic fire suppression efforts and land preservation have created an abundance of dry, dense vegetation on our protected lands that are adjacent to communities. Hotter, drier weather driven by climate change has further stressed the vegetation leading to fires that grow explosively under certain weather conditions and burn through communities. The November 2018 fires in Northern California are currently estimated to have resulted in $11.4 billion in insured losses.2 While the County has limited ability to influence the changing weather conditions, it can take a more active role in managing the tremendous fuel loading present in the wildland areas. To provide a sense of the magnitude of the work to be done, in 2018 CAL FIRE’s Director established their goal for treatment of state responsibility area (SRA) lands was approximately 40,000 acres statewide, with 20,000 acres of prescribed fire and 20,000 acres of fuels treatment. It is estimated that between 1999-2009 the state was only able to achieve approximately 13,000 acres of fuels management per year, statewide. While CAL FIRE has been able to increase the pace of fuels treatment, Scott Stephens, a wildland fire expert from the UC Berkeley Center for Fire Research estimated in 2015 that California, “must increase 2 http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/2019/release14-19.cfm Santa Clara County Fire Department Page 4 of 17 Wildfire Risk & Response County of Santa Clara Fire Department fuel-reduction efforts to ten times the area that is currently treated.”3 It is also believed a more proactive approach to fuels reduction and prescribed fire may generate lower carbon emissions than the larger, uncontrolled fires.4 Furthermore, each CAL FIRE unit in the Northern Region, including the Santa Clara Unit, has been tasked with treating a minimum of 2,000 acres of the 40,000-acre statewide goal. If the Santa Clara Unit, which covers portions of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, Santa Clara and Stanislaus counties, completed all of the assigned vegetation management work in Santa Clara County, that would represent just 0.4 percent (2,000 / 554,200) of the 554,200 acres of unincorporated wildland areas in the county. It is clear that the state has responsibility for the SRA watershed areas, which make up most of the unincorporated lands, however, the county is responsible for land use planning and development that occurs within the Santa Clara County unincorporated areas. Over the last 30 years, the county has seen an increase in urban sprawl/development in the unincorporated wildland urban interface areas, which in turn, has increased the risk to those communities should a wildland fire occur. This is not unique to Santa Clara County as many counties across the state are taking a more active role in supporting and augmenting the limited state resources to protect their citizens who reside in fire-prone, unincorporated areas. Despite significant efforts and spending to prevent future fires by the state, achieving greater vegetation management goals remains a significant challenge and cannot be accomplished by the state alone. To achieve greater vegetation management within Santa Clara County, greater coordination between local land owners, the state, local agencies responsible for fire protection and the County must occur. Historical Wildland Fire Risk in Santa Clara County As defined by the Probability and Consequence Matrix found on page 24 of Santa Clara County Fire Department’s Standards of Cover (SOC) document (Attachment F), a fire within the wildland urban interface is categorized as a maximum risk event. This is based on an assessment of probability of an event occurring and the associated consequence. A maximum risk event indicates the potential for a severe loss of life, severe loss of economic value, large loss of property, or it poses special challenges for emergency responders.
Recommended publications
  • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022
    CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022 Hazard Mitigation is any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. ~ Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (§206.401) Adopted by the City Council xxxx xx, 2017 Table of Contents APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................................... II MAPS AND FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ II TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................ III HOW TO USE THIS PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... IV PART 1 — INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECONOMIC IMPACT of 2016 LOMA FIRE the Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire
    THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF 2016 LOMA FIRE The Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire AUTHORS Zachary Christin, Johnny Mojica, Ken Cousins, and Matt Chadsey of Earth Economics. RECOMMENDED CITATION Christin, Z., Mojica, J., Cousins, K., Chadsey M. 2017. The Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is funded by the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority This document is owed to the guidance and review of Andrea Mackenzie, Marc Landgraf, and Derek Neumann of the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, as well as Earth Economics volunteer Tehva Kastel Riggan. Edit review by Jessica Hanson and cover page design by Sage McElroy, both of Earth Economics. We would also like to thank Earth Economics’ Board of Directors for their continued guidance and support: Alex Bernhardt, David Cosman, Elizabeth Hendrix, Greg Forge, Ingrid Rasch, Molly Seaverns, and Sherry Richardson. 1 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction: Natural Capital and California Wildfires in Santa Clara County .................... 6 2. What is Natural Capital ..................................................................................................... 8 3. Study Area and the Loma Fire Overview ......................................................................... 11 3.1. Geography and Major Features .............................................................................................. 11 3.2. Population
    [Show full text]
  • San Lorenzo River and North Coast Watersheds Sanitary Survey Update
    Santa Cruz Water Department in association with San Lorenzo Valley Water District San Lorenzo River and North Coast Watersheds Sanitary Survey Update February 2018 This Page Intentionally Blank 2350 Mission College Boulevard, Suite 525 Santa Clara, California 95454 650-852-2800 FAX: 650-856-8527 San Lorenzo River and North Coast Watersheds Sanitary Survey Update February 2018 Prepared for City of Santa Cruz 715 Graham Hill Rd. Santa Cruz, CA 95060 In association with San Lorenzo Valley Water District K/J Project No. 17680004*00 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Figures................................................................................................................................ x List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ xi Preparers ....................................................................................................................................... I Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... I Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Study Area .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Watershed Sanitary Survey Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Richmond Cover CWPP
    DRAFT 11/8/2019 Richmond CWPP Community Wildfire Protection Plan An Appendix to the Contra Costa Countywide Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Contra Costa County Prepared by Richmond Fire Department In conjunction with the Diablo Fire Safe Council Stakeholder Committee Members Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Scope and Purpose Section 1: City of Richmond Information 1.1 City Overview 1.2 The Planning Process & Stakeholders 1.3 Integration with Other Plans and Initiatives Section 2: Fire Hazard and Risk in the Wildland Urban Interface 2.1 Wildfire Environment 2.2 Wildland Urban Interface Risk and Hazard Assessments 2.2.1 Potential for Wildfire to Occur 2.2.2. What to Protect - Values at Risk within the WUI 2.2.3 Protection Capabilities 2.3 Strategies for Reducing Risk within the WUI Section 3: Recommended Action Plan 3.1 Selection of Recommended Priorities 3.2 Information, Education and Collaborative Planning Priorities 3.3 Enhanced Suppression Capability and Emergency Preparedness Priorities Section 4: Prioritizing Fuel Reduction Treatments 4.1 Hazardous Fuels Management 4.2 Fuels Reduction Treatments – Geographically Based Projects 4.3 Fuel Reduction Treatments – Related Priorities 4.4 Environmental Review and Permitting Section 5: Prioritizing Treatment of Structure Ignitability 5.1 Structure Ignitibility 5.2 Key Ignition Resistance Factors 5.3 Improving the Survivability of Structures within the WUI 5.4 “Home Hardening” - Retrofitting an Existing Structure for Survivability Section 6: Sustaining the Plan 6.1
    [Show full text]
  • (CNPS) Fire Recovery Guide
    FIRE RECOVERY GUIDE The Fire recovery Guide is made possible thanks to support from an anonymous donor, the Butte County Fire Safe Council, Giles W. and Elise G. Mead Foundation, Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, Marin and Mount Lassen chapters of CNPS, North Valley Community Foundation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and individual CNPS donors. We also want to acknowledge the dozens of topic experts who generously shared their time and knowledge to bring the latest science and information to our readers. We all owe them a debt of gratitude. Authors, Contributors, and Reviewers Heath Bartosh (Nomad Ecology) Jennifer Buck-Diaz (CNPS) Raphaela Floreani Buzbee (CNPS) Richard Casale (Natural Resources Conservation Service) Catherine Curley (CNPS) www.cnps.org Calli-Jane DeAnda (Butte Fire Safe Council) 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Julie Evens (CNPS) Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 Matteo Garbelotto (UC Berkeley) Phone: 916-447-2677 Dan Gluesenkamp (CNPS) Fax: 916-447-2727 Sarah Gordon (Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation) Email: [email protected] Richard Halsey (California Chaparral Institute) Diana Hickson (California Department of Fish and Wildlife) Nick Jensen (CNPS) Seth Kauppinen (CNPS) Elizabeth Kubey (CNPS) Roy Leggitt (Tree Management Experts) Don McEnhill (Russian River Keepers) Lech Naumovich (Golden Hour Restoration Institute) Liv O’Keeffe (Editor, CNPS) Brian Peterson (Nomad Ecology) Jaime Ratchford (CNPS) Ricky Satomi (UCANR) The science of fire recovery is advancing Alex Roa (Sonoma County Ag + Open Space) rapidly, and there are still differences of Wendy Trowbridge (Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation) interpretation among experts. We welcome Andrea Williams (Marin Municipal Water District) new information and will apply your Kate Wilkin (UCANR) feedback to improving future versions of Marti Witter (National Park Service) the Fire Recovery Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Disaster Code Declaration
    State/Tribal Number Date Government Incident Description Declaration Type 1259 11/6/1998 Florida Tropical Storm Mitch Major Disaster Declaration 1258 11/5/1998 Kansas Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration Severe Storms, Flooding and 1257 10/21/1998 Texas Tornadoes Major Disaster Declaration 1256 10/19/1998 Missouri Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1255 10/16/1998 Washington Landslide In The City Of Kelso Major Disaster Declaration Severe Storms, Flooding, And 1254 10/14/1998 Kansas Tornadoes Major Disaster Declaration 1253 10/14/1998 Missouri Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1252 10/5/1998 Washington Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1251 10/1/1998 Mississippi Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1250 9/30/1998 Alabama Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1249 9/28/1998 Florida Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 3133 9/28/1998 Alabama Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 3132 9/28/1998 Mississippi Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 3131 9/25/1998 Florida Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 2248 9/25/1998 Washington Columbia County Fire Management Assistance Declaration 1247 9/24/1998 Puerto Rico Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1248 9/24/1998 Virgin Islands Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1245 9/23/1998 Texas Tropical Storm Frances Major Disaster Declaration Tropical Storm Frances and 1246 9/23/1998 Louisiana Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration Hurricane Georges (Direct 3129 9/21/1998 Virgin Islands Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet November 6, 2018 Clerk of the Board YOLANDE BARIAL KNIGHT (510) 544-2020 PH MEMO to the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (510) 569-1417 FAX EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors DENNIS WAESPI The Regular Session of the NOVEMBER 6, 2018 President - Ward 3 Board Meeting is scheduled to commence at 1:00 p.m. at the EBRPD Administration Building, AYN WIESKAMP 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland Vice President - Ward 5 ELLEN CORBETT Treasurer - Ward 4 DEE ROSARIO Secretary - Ward 2 Respectfully submitted, WHITNEY DOTSON Ward 1 COLIN COFFEY Ward 7 BEVERLY LANE Ward 6 ROBERT E. DOYLE General Manager ROBERT E. DOYLE General Manager P.O. Box 5381 2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, CA 94605-0381 (888) 327-2757 MAIN (510) 633-0460 TDD (510) 569-1417 FAX www.ebparks.org AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6, 2018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT The Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park 11:00 a.m. ROLL CALL (Board Conference Room) District will hold a regular meeting at District’s Administration Building, 2950 PUBLIC COMMENTS Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland, CA, commencing at 11:00 a.m. CLOSED SESSION for Closed Session and 1:00 p.m. for Open Session on Tuesday, November 6, 2018. A. Conference with Labor Negotiator: Government Code Section 54957.6 Agenda for the meeting is listed adjacent. Times for agenda 1. Agency Negotiator: Robert E. Doyle, Ana M. Alvarez, items are approximate only and Kip Walsh, Eddie Kreisberg are subject to change during the Employee Organizations: AFSCME Local 2428, meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Please Answer the Following Questions to Provide Feedback and Suggestions
    OCTOBER 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND................................................................................................ 1 PLAN AUTHORITY ..................................................................................................................... 2 PLAN ADOPTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 PLAN USE .................................................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2—PLANNING PROCESS ....................................................................................... 5 PROCESS OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 5 PLANNING TEAM ....................................................................................................................... 5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PROCESS ................................................................................. 7 SUPPORTIVE RESOURCES ..................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 3—CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT ........................................................................... 11 RELEVANT PLANS AND PROGRAMS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Research Report By
    A Research Report by May 2018 May 2018 ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofit research group whose mission is to improve community development and land management decisions. CONTACT INFORMATION Kimiko Barrett, Ph.D. | [email protected] | 406-224-1837 Report published online at: https://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire/homes-risk/full- community-costs-of-wildfire ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work is made possible by grants from the U.S. Forest Service and the LOR Foundation. P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 https://headwaterseconomics.org Cover image by Colorado Springs Fire (2012), Associated Press TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. DEFINING WILDFIRE COSTS .......................................................................................................... 2 Direct Costs ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Indirect Costs ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Post-Fire Costs .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Wildfires 52 3.1 Identifying Hazards – Requirement §201.6(C)(2)(I): the Risk Assessment Shall Include a Descriptio
    Chapter 5: Wildfires CHAPTER 5: WILDFIRES 5.3.0 WILDFIRE RISK ASSESSMENT 5.3.1 IDENTIFYING WILDFIRE HAZARDS 3.1 Identifying Hazards – Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i): The risk assessment shall include a description of the type … of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. ildland fire may be defined as any unwanted fire involving outdoor vegetation. While it is often thought of as occurring in forests, rangelands or crop fields, it may also W occur in areas such as vacant lots, highway medians, parks and golf courses. With residential development spreading into pristine areas, a relatively new phenomenon has been created: the wildland/urban interface. This phenomenon has changed the nature of the wildland fire problem in some very significant ways. Both the life hazard and the potential economic losses in wildland areas have increased greatly, and the increase in human activity has multiplied the number and variety of potential sources of ignition. Wildland fires are influenced by three factors: fuel, weather and topography. The spread of wildland fires depends on the type of fuel that exists within the area in the form of grasses, brush and trees. Wildland fire behavior is also influenced by local weather which can modify the burn rate (how fast the fire burns.) Examples of weather incidents that affect wildland fires are atmospheric stability, inversions, thunderstorms, relative humidity and wind. Finally, the severity of wildland fires is influenced by topography including slope, aspect, chimneys and drainages, and the accessibility of the location. Priorities in the event of a wildfire are life safety, preservation of property and resource conservation.
    [Show full text]