DOCSLIB.ORG

Washoe County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Washoe County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Washoe County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan FINAL DRAFT – 2020 Plan Update Prepared by: Washoe County Emergency Management and Homeland Security Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Memorandum of Transmittal MEMORANDUM OF TRANSMITTAL i Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Plan Adoption and Approval PLAN ADOPTION AND APPROVAL 44 CFR §201.6(c)(5) and §201.7(c)(5) requires that the Washoe County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan be formally adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and all participating jurisdictions. The Hazard Mitigation Plan has been adopted by each jurisdiction as of the following dates. Plan adoption resolutions are included in Appendix H. Jurisdiction Adopting Body Adoption Date Washoe County Board of County Commissioners City of Reno City Council City of Sparks City Council Reno-Sparks Indian Colony Tribal Council Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Tribal Council Truckee River Flood Management Board of Directors Authority Truckee Meadows Fire Protection District Board of Fire Commissioners North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District Board of Fire Commissioners This plan was approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency on [date]. The official approval letter follows. iii Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The development of the Washoe County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan was made possible by the tireless work of the Mitigation Planning Team. Over the course of 12 months, the team held six formal workshops and met informally many other times. This cross-sector team identified the hardest hitting hazards, described their risks and cascading impacts, and developed a comprehensive mitigation strategy to reduce risk to community members and their property. The following organizations participated in the development of the Washoe County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan: . City of Reno . City of Sparks . National Weather Service – Reno . Nevada Department of Transportation . Nevada Seismological Lab . North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District . NV Energy . Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe . Reno-Sparks Indian Colony . Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority . Tahoe Pacific Hospital . The Red Cross . Truckee Meadows Fire Protection District . Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility . Truckee River Flood Management Authority . Warm Springs Community Task Force . Washoe County . Washoe County Amateur Radio Emergency Service Individuals are acknowledged for their efforts to develop an effective plan and sustainable program are listed in Appendix E. Support for the 2020 update of the Washoe County Hazard Mitigation Plan was provided under contract by Ecology and Environment, Inc. iv Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents RECORD OF PLAN UPDATE AND APPROVAL The Washoe County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan is required to be updated once every five years and submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for adoption and the Nevada Division of Emergency Management – Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for approval. The County may update the plan on a more frequent basis as needed without approval. Refer to Chapter 7 for more information on Plan Implementation guidance. Date of Update Date of Adoption Date of FEMA Approval 2010 December 2010 December 2010 2015 February 2016 January 2016 v Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS MEMORANDUM OF TRANSMITTAL ............................................................................................................... i PLAN ADOPTION AND APPROVAL ................................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ iv RECORD OF PLAN UPDATE AND APPROVAL ................................................................................................. v 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Authority .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 What is Hazard Mitigation? ....................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Purpose and Scope ..................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Washoe County Hazard Mitigation Program ............................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Organization ................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.2 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................ 1-5 1.4.2.1 Community Members .................................................................................. 1-5 1.4.2.2 Elected Officials ............................................................................................ 1-5 1.4.2.3 Community Emergency Managers ............................................................... 1-5 1.4.2.4 Mitigation Planning Team ............................................................................ 1-6 1.4.2.5 Governmental Departments and Agencies .................................................. 1-6 1.4.2.6 Community Partners and Neighboring Jurisdictions .................................... 1-6 1.5 Plan Organization ....................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.6 What’s New in the 2020 Update? .............................................................................................. 1-7 2 Planning Process .................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Planning Area ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Data Collection and Incorporation of Existing Plans .................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 2015 Washoe County Hazard Mitigation Plan .............................................................. 2-3 2.2.2 Washoe County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (2005 and 2008) ...................... 2-3 2.2.3 Washoe County Regional Flood Response Action Plan (2018) ..................................... 2-3 2.2.4 State of Nevada Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan (2018) .......................................... 2-3 2.2.5 Integration of Geographic Information Systems Data ................................................. 2-4 2.3 Coordination with Other Planning Efforts ................................................................................. 2-4 vii Washoe County, Nevada Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents 2.4 Mitigation Planning Team .......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.1 MPT Members .............................................................................................................. 2-4 2.4.2 MPT Meetings ............................................................................................................... 2-5 2.5 Inclusive Outreach and Public Engagement ............................................................................... 2-6 2.5.1 Inclusive Outreach and Public Engagement Plan ......................................................... 2-6 2.5.1.1 Online Outreach ........................................................................................... 2-6 2.5.1.2 Public Meetings ............................................................................................ 2-9 2.5.1.3 Plan Review ................................................................................................ 2-10 2.5.2 Neighboring Jurisdiction and Partner Engagement Strategies ................................... 2-11 2.6 Plan Development and Review ................................................................................................ 2-12 3 Community Profile ............................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Governance ................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Geography and Climate ............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.3 Population and Demographics ................................................................................................... 3-4 3.4 Economy ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain
    Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain, Co-Ordinator TrailSafe Nevada 1285 Baring Blvd. Sparks, NV 89434 [email protected] Nev. Dept. of Cons. & Natural Resources | NV.gov | Governor Brian Sandoval | Nev. Maps NEVADA STATE PARKS http://parks.nv.gov/parks/parks-by-name/ Beaver Dam State Park Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park Big Bend of the Colorado State Recreation Area Cathedral Gorge State Park Cave Lake State Park Dayton State Park Echo Canyon State Park Elgin Schoolhouse State Historic Site Fort Churchill State Historic Park Kershaw-Ryan State Park Lahontan State Recreation Area Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park Sand Harbor Spooner Backcountry Cave Rock Mormon Station State Historic Park Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort State Historic Park Rye Patch State Recreation Area South Fork State Recreation Area Spring Mountain Ranch State Park Spring Valley State Park Valley of Fire State Park Ward Charcoal Ovens State Historic Park Washoe Lake State Park Wild Horse State Recreation Area A SOURCE OF INFORMATION http://www.nvtrailmaps.com/ Great Basin Institute 16750 Mt. Rose Hwy. Reno, NV 89511 Phone: 775.674.5475 Fax: 775.674.5499 NEVADA TRAILS Top Searched Trails: Jumbo Grade Logandale Trails Hunter Lake Trail Whites Canyon route Prison Hill 1 TOURISM AND TRAVEL GUIDES – ALL ONLINE http://travelnevada.com/travel-guides/ For instance: Rides, Scenic Byways, Indian Territory, skiing, museums, Highway 50, Silver Trails, Lake Tahoe, Carson Valley, Eastern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southeast95 Adventure, I 80 and I50 NEVADA SCENIC BYWAYS Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada State History
    INFORMATIONAL TOPIC MAY 8, 2014 Nevada State History (in a nutshell) Although Spain claimed the Nevada region during the 1500s, no Timeline exploration occurred until the early 1800s. Native Americans living there at that time included the Paiute, Shoshone, and 1821 —Mexico gains control of Nevada Washoe tribes. 1859 —Thousands moved to Nevada as gold was discovered During the 1820s, trappers from the Hudson Bay Company in Virginia City explored the Humboldt River. Jedediah Smith traveled across 1861 —The Nevada Territory is created the Las Vegas valley and William Wolfskill blazed the Old Spanish Trail into California. Complete exploration of Nevada 1864 —Nevada becomes the 36 th state occurred during the 1840s; John C. Frémont explored and charted the Great Basin and Sierra Nevada. 1907 —The Newlands Irrigation Project is completed At the end of the Mexican -American War (1846-1848), the 1936 —Hoover Dam is completed southwest came under U.S. control. In 1850, the Utah Territory, that included Nevada, was established. Some of the first settlers came to Nevada during this time. Genoa was established by Mormon pioneers and became a trading post for those traveling to California. Some non-Mormons came to Carson Valley. They did not want to be part of the Utah Territory that was ruled by a Mormon leader. Without Congressional approval they established their own territorial government. In 1859, ore was discovered near what is now Virginia City and thousands came in search of gold and silver. With sufficient population in 1861, Congress could now create the Nevada Territory. Nevada did not have a large enough population to become a state during the Civil War (1861-1865).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022
    CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022 Hazard Mitigation is any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. ~ Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (§206.401) Adopted by the City Council xxxx xx, 2017 Table of Contents APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................................... II MAPS AND FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ II TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................ III HOW TO USE THIS PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... IV PART 1 — INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan O the Sky Highway T
    Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Highway to the Sky CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE & VISION PURPOSE & VISION 1 PLAN PURPOSE 2 CORRIDOR SETTING 3 VISION & GOALS 6 STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC OUTREACH 7 CHAPTER 2: MOUNT ROSE SCENIC BYWAY’S INTRINSIC VALUES INTRINSIC VALUES 19 TERRAIN 20 OWNERSHIP 22 LAND USE & COMMUNITY RESOURCES 24 VISUAL QUALITY 26 CULTURAL RESOURCES 30 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 34 HYDROLOGY 40 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES & WILDLIFE 42 FUEL MANAGEMENT & FIRES 44 CHAPTER 3: THE HIGHWAY AS A TRANSPORTATION FACILITY TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 47 EXISTING ROADWAY CONFIGURATION 48 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES & TRENDS 49 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES 50 EXISTING BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 50 EXISTING TRAFFIC SAFETY 50 EXISTING PARKING AREAS 55 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 55 CHAPTER 4: ENHANCING THE BYWAY FOR VISITING, LIVING & DRIVING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES & ACTION ITEMS 57 PRESERVE THE SCENIC QUALITY & NATURAL RESOURCES 59 BALANCE RECREATION ACCESS WITH TRANSPORTATION 68 & SAFETY NEEDS CONNECT PEOPLE WITH THE CORRIDOR 86 PROMOTE TOURISM 94 CHAPTER 5: CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP 99 MANAGING PARTNERS 100 CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS 102 | i This Plan was funded by an On Our Way grant from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and a Federal Scenic Byway Grant from the Nevada Department of Transportation. ii | Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan CHAPTER ONE 1 PURPOSE & VISION Chapter One | 1 The Corridor PLAN PURPOSE The Mount Rose Scenic Byway is officially named the “Highway to the Management Sky” and offers travelers an exciting ascent over the Sierra Nevada from Plan identifies the sage-covered slopes of the eastern Sierra west to Lake Tahoe. Not only goals, objectives does the highway connect travelers to a variety of recreation destinations and cultural and natural resources along the Byway, it also serves as a and potential minor arterial connecting both tourists and commuters from Reno to Lake enhancements to Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Before It Was a Park
    BEFORE IT WAS A PARK Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park and its Foundations in Comstock History Nevada Division of State Parks In honor of Nevada’s 150th anniversary 1864 to 2014 By Jay Howard, LTNSP 2014, revised 2017 A State Made by Mining Ron James wrote in his Comstock history novel The Roar and the Silence, “It was the longest telegraph ever sent, but Nevadan’s did not intend to do things in a small way. With the paperwork in order, Lincoln signed Nevada into statehood on October 31st 1864, just a few days before the November presidential election. Nevada sent back a thank-you in the form of three electoral votes for the president’s reelection.” Nevadan’s were proud of their pro-Union stance during the Civil War. Needed by the United States both politically and economically, the state of Nevada was said to have been ‘Battle Born’. Though we understand this to refer to the battles that had been raging in the east since 1861, Nevada was itself a relatively peaceful territory, other than the occasional skirmishes with Native Americans, and the more serious Pyramid Lake War of 1860. Nevadan’s never saw any fighting with Confederate forces, but certainly had their share of fistfights between Unionists and Copperheads. The latter usually losing the argument. During one incident, the Stars and Bars of the Confederacy was raised over a building in Virginia City, which led to a serious altercation between townspeople. Newspapers later reported that Unionists emerged bloody, but victorious. Early in the Civil War there was some concern that Nevada could be taken by the Confederacy, but these fears were never realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of the Nevada Rule of Law
    THE RULE OF LAW BY SCOTT G. WASSERMAN, ESQ. ORIGIN OF THE NEVADA RULE OF LAW At the request of the State Bar of Nevada’s with the Original States.” The act included the following Immediate Past President Gene Leverty, requirements: the Nevada Lawyer Editorial Board agreed 1. The new State Constitution must be republican to feature a discussion on the Rule of in nature and not repugnant to the U.S. Constitution or the Declaration of Independence; Law in each of the 2018 issues of Nevada 2. There shall be no slavery or involuntary servitude, Lawyer. Past columns have discussed the other than for punishment of crimes, without the American rule of law, and international consent of the U.S. and the people of Nevada; and historical rules of law. In this month’s 3. The Constitutional Convention must disclaim all rights to unappropriated public lands in Nevada; column, we examine the origin of 4. Land owned by U.S. citizens outside Nevada must not Nevada’s Rule of Law, which lies within the be discriminated against in taxation; and first written code of laws in Nevada: the 5. There must be no taxation of federal property by the state.4 Nevada Constitution, adopted in 1864. The Nevada Constitution established the basis On May 2, 1864, James W. Nye, Governor of the Territory of Nevada, issued a Proclamation to form the constitutional of the system of all state and local rules of convention. The congressional act required that the members law. All persons, including the state and of the convention for framing the constitution shall, after local governments, must operate within organization, on behalf of the people of the Territory, adopt the Constitution of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description
    e y ~ 'rte ~ 4 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~L +i's 's' ~ *" a~t,y'" J ^ ,..,T+s d az' ~ 8a•. ~r ~ ~Y. r~ ,~ } ~„ ~"' y s'~ ~- ~- N ~, 4 r ~ ts~ 0 ~ i~° e~ ~" t ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ y ^: *} ~ }t. ~ `/ ~ 6~ Y ~p S d~Y R" vW # ' `i ti r n' ke~s ~ J ~ ~ ~~ +3 ~ y t ~r x. t' ~ ~~ ~i _ ~.~y ~g x ,. 9~ :~ ~ x aaa+ra.. "' ~$ .;~w~.v 'Y~1se~n ~+~.~-*a fir;.: ~. ,... §~~`" u, a ., .. ~.: w Letters of Transmittal December 9, 1963 December 9, 1963 JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My dear Governor: Dear Sir: The 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways, Depart- In compliance with Section 143 of the Streets and Highways ment of Public Works, which I am pleased to submit to you, Code, the 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways for presents a broad picture of the state highway program during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1963, is submitted herewith fiscal year 1962-63. It describes the steady progress in planning for your approval and transmittal to Governor Edmund G. and constructing today for tomorrow's transportation needs, as Brown. well as the activities of the division's various units. The report contains information on the construction program Your attention is invited to the comments contained in the through the end of 1963 and a description of the projects in enclosed letter of transmittal from the State Highway Engineer the budget for fiscal year 1964-65 which the California High- regarding progress on the interstate system and on the network way Commission adopted in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Lake Range fault zone (Class A) No. 1607 Last Review Date: 2016-03-03 citation for this record: Sawyer, T.L., Haller, K.M., and Adams, K., compilers, 2016, Fault number 1607, Lake Range fault zone, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 02:29 PM. Synopsis This discontinuous zone of normal faults bounds the west front of the Fox Range and Lake Range from Buckbrush Spring southward along and apparently beneath Pyramid Lake to east of Anaho Island, and locally traverses piedmont slope along the east side of the Pyramid Lake basin. Both the Lake Range and Fox Range are east-tilted blocks that border sedimentary basins on their west sides. The range-front faults are expressed as abrupt west-facing range fronts and juxtapose late Quaternary piedmont- slope deposits against bedrock. Short piedmont faults are marked by scarps on late Quaternary piedmont-slope deposits east of Sheep Pass in the Lake Range and at mouth of Hell's Kitchen Canyon, where the fault projects southward beneath Pyramid Lake. Regional geologic mapping and reconnaissance photogeologic mapping are the sources of data. Trench investigations and detailed studies of scarp morphology have not been conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]