Report to County Board of Supervisors on Wildfire Risk and Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report to County Board of Supervisors on Wildfire Risk and Response Report to Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors WILDFIRE RISK & RESPONSE April 2019 County of Santa Clara Fire Department BACKGROUND At the December 4, 2018 Board of Supervisors meeting, a board referral was given to the County Fire Chief due to the implications of the huge increase in wildland fires in the region and the potential risks to Santa Clara County. Specifically, the referral requested information on tools, technology, strategies, policies, procedures and resources available in the County as well as what additional resources are needed to protect our community. The Santa Clara County Fire Department (Central Fire Protection District) Fire Chief was asked to coordinate with the other fire districts (Los Altos Hills and South Santa Clara County), the Roads and Airports department, and County Parks and report back to the Board no later than April, 2019. The Board’s request came shortly after the Camp fire destroyed the communities of Concow, Magalia, and Paradise in Butte County, ending the deadliest and most destructive year of wildland fires in California history. More than 20,000 structures were destroyed, over 1.9 million acres burned, and 98 people were killed. The Camp fire alone is estimated to have cost over $120 million to contain1 and burned more than 18,000 structures, becoming California’s most destructive wildland fire ever. This is remarkable considering just 13- months prior the Tubbs fire in Sonoma County had been the most destructive fire in California history burning 5,636 structures and killing 22 people. These fires fueled by dense, dry vegetation and warmer, drier weather have unfortunately become increasingly more common over the last several years and have resulted in rising suppression costs. In fact, the last ten fire seasons have produced 7 of California’s most destructive wildland fires (Table 1). Table 1. Most Destructive California Wildland Fires Incident Acres Structures Deaths Date Camp Fire 153,336 18,804 86 Nov 2018 Tubbs 36,807 5,636 22 Oct 2017 Tunnel 1,600 2,900 25 Oct 1991 Cedar 273,246 2,820 15 Oct 2003 Valley 76,067 1,955 4 Sep 2015 Witch 197,990 1,650 2 Oct 2007 1 Camp Fire, Incident Status Summary (ICS-209), November 25, 2018 Santa Clara County Fire Department Page 2 of 17 Wildfire Risk & Response County of Santa Clara Fire Department Woolsey 96,949 1,643 2 Nov 2018 Carr 229,651 1,604 8 Jul 2018 Nuns 54,382 1,355 3 Oct 2017 Thomas 281,893 1,063 2 Dec 2017 Source: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection It is clear we are seeing unprecedented fire behavior and destruction and need to take immediate action to reduce our risk and ensure Santa Clara County can respond effectively to the, “new normal.” To do this I recommend establishing a County Wildland Fire program, adopting the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) annexes 1, 2, 4, 13, 18, and approval of a 2- year workplan for the newly established Wildland Fire Program with a focus on operationalizing the CWPP. A Wildland Fire Program within the County Fire Marshal’s Office staffed with a program manager/interagency coordinator, a pre-fire planner and a Senior Deputy Fire Marshal will serve as the foundation of the workplan and provide countywide coordination amongst the many stakeholders. In addition, the program will immediately develop a best practices report summarizing the county level wildland fire preparedness efforts in other counties (Alameda, Marin, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties) to ensure our long-term strategy is based on the combined experience of our partners throughout the State. Specific recommendations include: • The creation of a County Wildland Fire Program within the County Fire Marshal’s Office to coordinate a unified approach to wildland fire risk reduction countywide, including program funding out of the general fund and workplan authorization (Attachment B – Workplan). • Board adoption of all Community Wildfire Protection Plan Annexes (Attachment C – CWPP incl. Annex 1, 2, 4, 13, 18) over which the County has authority. • Funding for one Type 6 fire engine and one brush masticator tractor to accelerate implementation of Department of Parks and Recreation hazardous fuels reduction projects. • Establish a policy for effective, integrated roadside vegetation management (fire fuel reduction) for County roadways, including chemical herbicide application and mowing in areas designated as high or very high fire hazard severity zones as defined by the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and authorize the administration to Santa Clara County Fire Department Page 3 of 17 Wildfire Risk & Response County of Santa Clara Fire Department provide exemptions for the use of effective, economical pre- and post-emergent herbicide on roads in the designated high fire areas. Funding these four recommendations would have a FY2019-20 impact to the general fund of $1,211,511 recurring and $437,500 in one-time funds (Attachment D, Detailed Costs). The detailed wildland fire program within this report, if implemented, will have a positive impact on seniors and children to the extent that improving wildland fire preparedness and response will enhance public safety. Seniors are often amongst the most vulnerable populations in our communities, particularly during emergencies that require evacuations. The “New Normal” Unfortunately, recent climate reports forecast our risk to wildland fire is increasing. According to the recently published, California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment: California’s Changing Climate 2018 (Attachment E), “the science is highly certain that California will continue to warm and experience greater impacts from climate change in the future.” The report forecasts the area burned by wildland fire will increase as a result, and the last few fire seasons lend support to the prediction. Warmer, drier weather and dense vegetation adjacent to our communities are magnifying our historic wildland fire risk. This phenomenon can best be illustrated in the equation shown below. FUEL + WEATHER + WILDLAND URBAN INTERACE = DESTRUCTIVE FIRES Within the equation, historic fire suppression efforts and land preservation have created an abundance of dry, dense vegetation on our protected lands that are adjacent to communities. Hotter, drier weather driven by climate change has further stressed the vegetation leading to fires that grow explosively under certain weather conditions and burn through communities. The November 2018 fires in Northern California are currently estimated to have resulted in $11.4 billion in insured losses.2 While the County has limited ability to influence the changing weather conditions, it can take a more active role in managing the tremendous fuel loading present in the wildland areas. To provide a sense of the magnitude of the work to be done, in 2018 CAL FIRE’s Director established their goal for treatment of state responsibility area (SRA) lands was approximately 40,000 acres statewide, with 20,000 acres of prescribed fire and 20,000 acres of fuels treatment. It is estimated that between 1999-2009 the state was only able to achieve approximately 13,000 acres of fuels management per year, statewide. While CAL FIRE has been able to increase the pace of fuels treatment, Scott Stephens, a wildland fire expert from the UC Berkeley Center for Fire Research estimated in 2015 that California, “must increase 2 http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/2019/release14-19.cfm Santa Clara County Fire Department Page 4 of 17 Wildfire Risk & Response County of Santa Clara Fire Department fuel-reduction efforts to ten times the area that is currently treated.”3 It is also believed a more proactive approach to fuels reduction and prescribed fire may generate lower carbon emissions than the larger, uncontrolled fires.4 Furthermore, each CAL FIRE unit in the Northern Region, including the Santa Clara Unit, has been tasked with treating a minimum of 2,000 acres of the 40,000-acre statewide goal. If the Santa Clara Unit, which covers portions of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, Santa Clara and Stanislaus counties, completed all of the assigned vegetation management work in Santa Clara County, that would represent just 0.4 percent (2,000 / 554,200) of the 554,200 acres of unincorporated wildland areas in the county. It is clear that the state has responsibility for the SRA watershed areas, which make up most of the unincorporated lands, however, the county is responsible for land use planning and development that occurs within the Santa Clara County unincorporated areas. Over the last 30 years, the county has seen an increase in urban sprawl/development in the unincorporated wildland urban interface areas, which in turn, has increased the risk to those communities should a wildland fire occur. This is not unique to Santa Clara County as many counties across the state are taking a more active role in supporting and augmenting the limited state resources to protect their citizens who reside in fire-prone, unincorporated areas. Despite significant efforts and spending to prevent future fires by the state, achieving greater vegetation management goals remains a significant challenge and cannot be accomplished by the state alone. To achieve greater vegetation management within Santa Clara County, greater coordination between local land owners, the state, local agencies responsible for fire protection and the County must occur. Historical Wildland Fire Risk in Santa Clara County As defined by the Probability and Consequence Matrix found on page 24 of Santa Clara County Fire Department’s Standards of Cover (SOC) document (Attachment F), a fire within the wildland urban interface is categorized as a maximum risk event. This is based on an assessment of probability of an event occurring and the associated consequence. A maximum risk event indicates the potential for a severe loss of life, severe loss of economic value, large loss of property, or it poses special challenges for emergency responders.
Recommended publications
  • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022
    CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022 Hazard Mitigation is any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. ~ Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (§206.401) Adopted by the City Council xxxx xx, 2017 Table of Contents APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................................... II MAPS AND FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ II TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................ III HOW TO USE THIS PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... IV PART 1 — INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Declarations in California
    Disaster Declarations in California (BOLD=Major Disaster) (Wildfires are Highlighted) 2018 DR-4353 Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows, And Debris Flows Declared on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 - 06:00 FM-5244 Pawnee Fire Declared on Sunday, June 24, 2018 - 07:11 FM-5245 Creek Fire Declared on Monday, June 25, 2018 - 07:11 2017 DR-4301 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 13:15 EM-3381 Potential Failure of the Emergency Spillway at Lake Oroville Dam Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:20 DR-4302 Severe Winter Storm Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:30 DR-4305 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 04:48 DR-4308 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, Mudslides Declared on Saturday, April 1, 2017 - 16:55 DR-4312 Flooding Declared on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 - 14:00 FM-5189 Wall Fire Declared on Sunday, July 9, 2017 - 14:18 FM-5192 Detwiler Fire Declared on Monday, July 17, 2017 - 19:23 DR-4344 Wildfires Declared on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 08:40 2016 FM-5124 Old Fire Declared on Saturday, June 4, 2016 - 21:55 FM-5128 Border 3 Fire Declared on Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:03 FM-5129 Fish Fire Declared on Monday, June 20, 2016 - 20:35 FM-5131 Erskine Fire Declared on Thursday, June 23, 2016 - 20:57 FM-5132 Sage Fire Declared on Saturday, July 9, 2016 - 18:15 FM-5135 Sand Fire Declared on Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 17:34 FM-5137 Soberanes Fire Declared on Thursday, July 28, 2016 - 16:38 FM-5140 Goose Fire Declared on Saturday, July 30, 2016 - 20:48
    [Show full text]
  • National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend October 3-4, 2015
    Remembering ver in Our Hea Fore rts ® National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend Weekend Memorial Firefighters Fallen National 2015 ® National Fallen Firefighters Foundation Post Office Drawer 498 National Fallen Firefighters Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727 Memorial Weekend 301.447.1365 • 301.447.1645 fax www.firehero.org • [email protected] October 3-4, 2015 matt Ambelas • David Wilbur Anderson • Thomas Araguz III • Samir P. “Sam” Ashmar • matt Ambelas • David Wilbur Anderson • Thomas Araguz III • Samir P. “Sam” Ashmar • Gregory D. Barnas • Jeffery Edward Bayless • Kevin L. Bell • James E. Bethea • Joseph Gregory D. Barnas • Jeffery Edward Bayless • Kevin L. Bell • James E. Bethea • Joseph Edward Bove III • Kevin J. Bristol • Bruce Britt • John M. Burns • Jerry Campbell • Paul S. Edward Bove III • Kevin J. Bristol • Bruce Britt • John M. Burns • Jerry Campbell • Paul S. Cash • Douglas J. Casson • Dennis A. Channell • Richard L. Choate • Joyce M. Craig • Cash • Douglas J. Casson • Dennis A. Channell • Richard L. Choate • Joyce M. Craig • James A. Dickman • Ricky W. Doub • Ted F. Drake • Fred Edwards • Hugh B. Ferguson James A. Dickman • Ricky W. Doub • Ted F. Drake • Fred Edwards • Hugh B. Ferguson III • David P. Fiori • Kellen A. Fleming • Robert William “Bob” Fogle III • Jonathan E. III • David P. Fiori • Kellen A. Fleming • Robert William “Bob” Fogle III • Jonathan E. French • Donovan Artie Garcia Jr. • Michael Dale “Mikey” Garrett • Charles Edward French • Donovan Artie Garcia Jr. • Michael Dale “Mikey” Garrett • Charles Edward Goff • Matthew Goodnature • Daniel David Groover • John Derek Gupton • Ramon Goff • Matthew Goodnature • Daniel David Groover • John Derek Gupton • Ramon Edward “Ray” Hain • Homer W.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Departments by County FDID Dept Name Mailing Address City Zip Chief Namereg Year Phone Chief E-Mail
    Fire Departments by County FDID Dept Name Mailing Address City Zip Chief NameReg Year Phone Chief E-Mail ADAIR 00105 ADAIR COUNTY RURAL FIRE DIST #1 801 N Davis Greentop 63546 Barry Mitchell2010 (660) 627-5394 [email protected] 00103 EASTERN ADAIR FIRE & RESCUE P. O. BOX 1049 Brashear 63533 JAMES SNYDER2010 (660) 865-9886 [email protected] 00101 KIRKSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 401 N FRANKLIN KIRKSVILLE 63501 RANDY BEHRENS2010 (660) 665-3734 [email protected] 00106 NOVINGER COMMUNITY VOL FIRE ASSOCATION INC P. O. BOX 326 NOVINGER 63559 DAVID KETTLE2010 (660) 488-7615 00104 SOUTHWESTERN ADAIR COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 24013 STATE HIGHWAY 3 KIRKSVILLE 63501 DENNIS VANSICKEL2010 (660) 665-8338 [email protected] ANDREW 00202 BOLCKOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PO BOX 113 BOLCKOW 64427 JIM SMITH2008 (816) 428-2012 [email protected] 00201 COSBY-HELENA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COSBY 64436 Dennis Ford2010 (816) 662-2106 [email protected] 00203 FILLMORE FIRE PROTECTION DIST P. O. BOX 42 FILLMORE 64449 RON LANCE2008 (816) 487-4048 00207 ROSENDALE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PO BOX 31 ROSENDALE 64483 BRYAN ANDREW 2003 00205 SAVANNAH FIRE DEPARTMENT PO BOX 382 SAVANNAH 64485 Tommy George2010 (816) 324-7533 [email protected] 00206 SAVANNAH RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PO BOX 382 SAVANNAH 64485 Tommy George2010 (816) 324-7533 [email protected] ATCHISON 00301 FAIRFAX VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT P.O. BOX 513 FAIRFAX 64446 ROBERT ERWIN 2008 00308 ROCK PORT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT PO Box 127 ROCK PORT 64482 STEPHEN SHINEMAN2010 (660) 744-2141 [email protected] 00304 TARKIO FIRE DEPARTMENT 112 WALNUT TARKIO 64491 DUANE UMBAUGE 2006 00306 WATSON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT PO BOX 127 ROCKPORT 64482 TOM GIBSON2008 (660) 744-2141 00305 WEST ATCHISON RURAL FIRE DISTRICT 516 SOUTH MAIN ST ROCKPORT 64482 STEPHEN SHINEMAN2010 (660) 744-2141 [email protected] 00302 WESTBORO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo
    Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo - Santa Cruz Cloverdale VMP - 2010 6/15/2011 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES................................................. 8 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM ........................................................................................................... 12 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF ASSETS AT RISK ................................................................................ 15 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ........................................................................................................ 17 SECTION IV: PRE FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ................................................................................................................. 18 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY ............................................................... 19 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION .................................................................................. 22 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Fire Review
    Reading Fire Review Smoke rises north of Reading Peak on Sunday, August 4, 2012—one week after lightning ignites the Reading Fire. Left and middle Reading Fire suppression photos taken on August 16. Photo on right of firefighters gridding for spots is from August 15. Lassen Volcanic National Park December 18, 2012 Reading Fire Review • Lassen Volcanic National Park 1 The Reading Fire as seen from Mt. Harkness on August 6. Contents Executive Summary…………………………………..… 3 1. Introduction………………………………………….………………..……… 6 2. Background – Lassen Volcanic National Park Fire History…………...... 7 3. Summary – A Learning-Focused Review of this Incident……………..... 10 4. Reading Fire Chronology………………………….………………..……… 13 5. Fire Behavior Summary…………………………..…………………..……. 20 6. Key Factors and Lessons Learned by the Participants….………...…… 29 7. Key Factors and Lessons Learned by the Review Team….….…...…… 34 8. Recommendations……………………………………….…………………. 38 9. Commendations……………….....……………………….………………… 39 10. Review Team Members………….……………………………......…….…. 40 11. Appendices Appendix A – Reading Fire Compliance with Wildland Fire Management Policy……..……………....... 41 Appendix B – Review Team Delegation of Authority…………..…….... 43 Appendix C – Reading Fire Comprehensive Chronology…………….... 44 Appendix D – The Lassen Volcanic National Park Pocket Card…...….. 51 Appendix E – General Exhibited Fire Behavior Based on Live Fuel Moisture Values…….……………….. 52 Appendix F – Manzanita RAWS Wind Graph………………….…….….. 53 Cover page photo credits: Bottom left photo taken by Kim Lemke. All other photos provided by Lassen Volcanic National Park. Reading Fire Review • Lassen Volcanic National Park 2 Reading Fire Review Executive Summary On July 23, 2012, a lightning strike started the Reading Fire in the interior of Lassen Volcanic National Park. The fire, located at approximately 7,000 feet in elevation, was located in red fir with areas of rock and limited ground fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • TEAM NAME TOTAL TEAM FUNDRAISING 1 Seattle Fire-Team
    # TEAM NAME TOTAL TEAM FUNDRAISING 1 Seattle Fire-Team Tristan $98,494.39 2 Burien/North Highline Fire $77,767.10 3 Richland Fire Department $61,634.69 4 Boise Firefighters Local 149 $59,387.55 5 Everett Fire $57,287.39 6 Corvallis Fire Department $37,178.14 7 Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue/Local 1660 $30,994.02 8 Boeing Fire $28,819.00 9 City of Buckley Fire Department $27,869.20 10 Bend Fire & Rescue $27,233.45 11 Central Pierce Fire and Rescue $25,779.21 12 Vancouver Fire Local 452 $25,627.68 13 Coeur d alene $24,977.25 14 Nampa Fire Dept $22,622.00 15 Cal Fire / SLO County Fire $22,073.22 16 Central Mat-Su Fire Department $21,543.66 17 Kent Firefighters Local 1747 $21,493.39 18 Kirkland Fire $21,023.95 19 Skagit District 8 $20,605.00 20 Tacoma Fire $20,556.65 21 Navy Region Northwest Fire & Emergency Services $19,781.56 22 Tukwila Firefighters Local 2088 $19,596.89 23 Graham Fire $19,175.00 24 South Whatcom Fire Authority $19,016.48 25 San Bernardino County Fire Department $18,329.62 26 Meridian Firefighters $18,267.22 27 La Pine Fire District $17,963.95 28 Team Texas $17,684.00 29 Local 2878 $17,319.35 30 Central Mason $17,098.05 31 Bellevue Fire $16,999.00 32 Templeton Fire Department $16,832.00 33 Spokane Valley Fire Department $16,459.64 34 Tumwater Fire $15,803.96 35 Great Falls Fire Rescue $15,740.00 36 Central Valley Fire District $15,657.00 37 Longview Fire $15,575.00 38 Caldwell Fire Department $15,277.95 39 Umatilla County Fire Dist.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Element
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 6: Safety Element 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND CONTENT ...................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................... 2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS .............................................................................................................. 3 Other General Plan Elements .................................................................................................................... 3 Area Plans .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ....................................................................................... 3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ....................................................................... 4 HAZARD REDUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ISSUES AND POLICIES ............................................................................................................................ 6 CODE CONFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECONOMIC IMPACT of 2016 LOMA FIRE the Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire
    THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF 2016 LOMA FIRE The Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire AUTHORS Zachary Christin, Johnny Mojica, Ken Cousins, and Matt Chadsey of Earth Economics. RECOMMENDED CITATION Christin, Z., Mojica, J., Cousins, K., Chadsey M. 2017. The Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is funded by the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority This document is owed to the guidance and review of Andrea Mackenzie, Marc Landgraf, and Derek Neumann of the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, as well as Earth Economics volunteer Tehva Kastel Riggan. Edit review by Jessica Hanson and cover page design by Sage McElroy, both of Earth Economics. We would also like to thank Earth Economics’ Board of Directors for their continued guidance and support: Alex Bernhardt, David Cosman, Elizabeth Hendrix, Greg Forge, Ingrid Rasch, Molly Seaverns, and Sherry Richardson. 1 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction: Natural Capital and California Wildfires in Santa Clara County .................... 6 2. What is Natural Capital ..................................................................................................... 8 3. Study Area and the Loma Fire Overview ......................................................................... 11 3.1. Geography and Major Features .............................................................................................. 11 3.2. Population
    [Show full text]
  • Cascade Complex Accident Prevention Analysis Report Table of Contents
    Intermountain Region November 9, 2007 CASCADE COMPLEX ACCIDENT PREVENTION ANALYSIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 PROLOGUE 4 INTRODUCTION 6 REVIEW OBJECTIVES 8 INFORMATION SOURCES AND PROCESSES 8 SETTING THE STAGE 9 THE STORY 24 EPILOGUE 36 LESSONS LEARNED BY TH E PEERS 43 LESSONS LEARNED ANALYSIS 48 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATOINS 56 APPENDIX A Chronology of Events 57 APPENDIX B Fire Behavior Specials Report 61 APPENDIX C A Human Factors Analysis of the Cascade Complex 87 APPENDIX D Health and Safety Analysis 103 APPENDIX D-1 Geomatrix Report 108 APPENDIX E Cascade Complex Accident Prevention Analysis Team Members 119 Cascade Complex - Accident Prevention Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Three events occurring on the Cascade Complex during August 12-14, 2007 are the subject of this report. These events are as follows: • Entrapment of a fire support truck driver and passenger on the Warm Lake Road; • Decision by the incident management team (IMT) to stay at the incident command post (ICP) location as the fire burned around the ICP; • Decision by the IMT to remain at the ICP location during the smoke-filled days following the fire burning around the camp. This report tells the story from the perspective of the review team and examines the social and organizational causes that led to the decisions and their outcomes. Since the review included an entrapment incident, the Forest Service Washington Office delegated authority for the review to the Intermountain Regional Forester. The Regional Forester identified a review team and asked them to follow the Accident Prevention Analysis process while meeting the following objectives: • Enable the reader of your report to understand the situation, the decisions that were made, and why they were made; • With the input of those involved and the expertise of your team, articulate the organizational and cultural factors that led to unintended outcomes; and • Based on your analysis of these events, recommend actions that you believe will enhance the safety and reliability of our organization in the future.
    [Show full text]