DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Engineering and Maintenance Pump Room Inspections MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SPECIFICATION FOR INSPECTION, SERVICE AND EMERGENCY REPAIRS OF TUNNEL DEWATERING PUMP ROOMS PREPARED BY: Engineering and Maintenance July 27, 2017 7/27/2017 SECTION I - GENERAL Reviewer Initials:______ Page 1 of 15 Date:______ Engineering and Maintenance Pump Room Inspections TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - GENERAL .................................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION II - MATERIALS ................................................................................................................................ 6 SECTION III – E XECUTION ............................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction: This specification outlines the MBTA’s requirements from a contractor to provide inspection, testing, and maintenance services to the Authority-tunnel dewatering Pump Rooms. Reliability, responsibility, and capability are of utmost importance to the Authority while seeking a contractor for this work. The MBTA requires contractors to read and understand all specifications, including this technical specification, before submitting a bid. The MBTA encourages questions to be asked if some things are not clear due to this specification, or any attached. Please fill in your contractor information below, initial, and date each page before moving to the next page. Return the initialed copy of the technical specification with bid package Contractor name: ____________________________________________________________ Reviewer name: ____________________________________________________________ Reviewer title: ____________________________________________________________ Reviewer signature: ____________________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________________________ 7/27/2017 SECTION I - GENERAL Reviewer Initials:______ Page 2 of 15 Date:______ Engineering and Maintenance Pump Room Inspections SECTION I - GENERAL 1. DESCRIPTION a. Services to be provided under this contract shall consist of inspection, service and emergency repairs of tunnel dewatering pump rooms and service calls for other pump room equipment installed throughout the MBTA. 2. SAFETY PRECAUTIONS a. The contractor shall provide, place and maintain to the satisfaction of the MBTA, safety guards and barriers for the prevention of accidents that might be caused by work performed under this contract. b. The contractor shall be responsible for providing and maintaining personnel protective equipment required to protect its employee from injury or harm during performance of the work under this contract. 3. CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS a. The contractor's repair vehicles shall be visibly identified on the outside with contractor's name and address. These repair vehicles shall never be parked in areas that will impede MBTA vehicles. b. Service personnel shall wear company labeled uniforms and carry photo identification worn visibly for entrance and access to MBTA property. c. All service personnel accessing the MBTA’s ROW (Right of Way) shall be required to go through ROW training and carry the license with them on MBTA Property. d. The contractor shall operate and maintain a local facility within one hour's travel time to any Authority location, stocked with parts and equipment to service the units specified in this contract. The MBTA reserves the right to access the premises. e. The owner/ manager shall have factory certified or License technicians .Copies of all Service Technician's and Contractor's licenses shall be required for review prior to contract award. f. If a pump station requires removal from service for repairs, immediate notification to an Authorized MBTA Representative must be made. Confirmation of location and all other relevant information shall be given to the Authorized MBTA Representative. Once the notification has been confirmed, the contractor will assist E&M in the placement of emergency pumps of sufficient capacity. g. At the end of each working day, the contractor shall report to the Maintenance Control Center (617-222-5278) all service and/or maintenance work performed that day, identifying the location(s) and the tasks performed. h. At the end of each working day, the contractor will submit a written daily work sheet to the Mechanical Maintenance Division, Building #2, Charlestown. The daily work sheet will specify pump type, model number, location, service performed. Work form will be pre-approved prior to contract award. i. All invoices shall be typed, itemizing parts and labor, and identifying the unit serviced, including location and work performed. Invoices without this information will not be processed for payment. j. The contractor shall be legally responsible, in accordance with local, state and federal regulations, for handling and disposing of all hazardous wastes/materials generated from the units serviced. Copies of any manifests shall be sent to the Supervisor of Mechanical Maintenance, 21 Arlington Avenue, Building #2, Charlestown, MA, 02129. k. The contractor shall comply within a month of contract being awarded to the timeframe and for performing routine inspections/ re-certifications (Schedule of Prices). No work 7/27/2017 SECTION I - GENERAL Reviewer Initials:______ Page 3 of 15 Date:______ Engineering and Maintenance Pump Room Inspections or invoicing for these items will be allowed without this written schedule being submitted and approved. l. Contractor shall provide to the MBTA, a suppliers' parts list with prices prior to commencing any work on this contract. All invoicing shall reflect pricing per this list. Should an occasion arise that a non-standard part is required, the contractor shall notify the MBTA by phone or in writing stating item name, its use and cost. Invoice for this item(s) shall list date of call and person giving approval. For all items, which cost in excess of $250.00, contractor shall submit in writing the item name, its use and cost, including a catalog cut (if available) and a suppliers' list price for approval. The MBTA reserves the right to seek alternate pricing and supplies for these parts. m. Contractor must provide a sample checksheet with initial bid for approval prior to contract award. 4. SCOPE OF WORK a. Contractor shall furnish all materials, replacement parts, tools and equipment to perform a servicing program described in Part III, (Execution), of these specifications for the equipment listed in Appendix A. Servicing/ maintenance program shall be for a three -year period. b. Types of units to be serviced under this item are dewatering pumps and sewage ejectors. 5. SITE VISITS a. The bidders may coordinate with MBTA to visit one (1) job site, typical of all others, and inspect the working conditions, accessibility and operational requirements. 6. PRE-QUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS a. The MBTA reserves the right to reject any or all bids if it is in the public interest to do so. 7. DEFINITIONS a. Where the word MBTA is used, it shall be understood to include the General Manager or their designee. 8. TERMS a. The term of this contract shall be for three (3) calendar years, commencing when the contract is awarded and signed by the MBTA. b. The MBTA reserves the right to terminate this contract at any time with two (2) months written notice. c. The MBTA reserves the right to renew and extend this contract, under the terms and conditions set forth herein, for a subsequent one (1) year period on an annual basis and from month to month thereafter as needed, by agreement between the parties. d. The contractor shall provide labor and management, which can work in harmony with the MBTA and all other elements of labor employed or to be employed by the MBTA. e. The contractor will pay their workers the prevailing rates of wages for their trades as published by the Massachusetts Department of Labor and Industries. 9. BASIS OF AWARD a. It is the MBTA's intent to award the contract to the lowest qualified and responsive bidder. i. The MBTA reserves the right to award a contract to the second lowest qualified and responsive bidder if it feels it is in the MBTA's best interest to do so. If so, the lowest contractor will be awarded a contract equal to 80% of his total bid and the second lowest bidder shall receive a contact in an amount equal to 20% of his bid. 7/27/2017 SECTION I - GENERAL Reviewer Initials:______ Page 4 of 15 Date:______ Engineering and Maintenance Pump Room Inspections ii. Work will be given to second bidder when it is deemed by the MBTA that the lowest bidder is unable to respond satisfactorily to a service request. 10. GUARANTEE a. In addition to the guarantees provided by component manufacturers of products utilized for maintenance, the contractor shall guarantee that all materials, components, equipment and accessories installed shall perform for a period of one (1) year without failure due to manufacturing defects, product misapplication or improper installation. b. The contractor shall guarantee that all OEM components, materials, equipment and accessories provided will successfully and acceptably perform the function for which they are intended and meet design requirements. If any material or equipment furnished and installed by the contractor develops defects within one (1) year from the date of installation, the contractor shall, without any additional charge, replace this material or equipment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Capital Investment Program Appendix A
    2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN APPENDIX A: INVESTMENT DETAILS Appendix A: Investment Details This section provides the lists of investments contained within this CIP. The information within each column is described below: • Location – where the investment is located • Project ID – the Division specific ID that uniquely identifies each investment • Project name – the name of the investment and a brief description • Priority – the capital priority that the investment addresses • Program – the program from which the investment is made • Score – the score of the investment (reliability investments are not scored) • Total cost – the total cost of the investment • Prior years – the spending on the investment that pre-dates the plan update • FY 2021 – the spending estimated to occur in fiscal year 2021 • Post FY 2021 – the estimated spending to occur post fiscal year 2021 for the project APPENDIX A: INVESTMENT DETAILS 2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN ii Aeronautics 2021 Capital Investment Plan Total Prior Years 2021 After 2021 Location Division ID Priority Program Project Description Score $M $M $M $M Barnstable Municipal Aeronautics | Airport AE21000002 1 | Reliability SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 1 $0.72 $0.00 $0.72 $0.00 Airport capital improvement Aeronautics | Airport MEPA/NEPA/CCC FOR MASTER PLAN AE21000003 1 | Reliability 1 $0.80 $0.53 $0.28 $0.00 capital improvement IMPROVEMENTS Aeronautics | Airport AE21000023 1 | Reliability AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1 $1.12 $0.00 $0.05 $1.07 capital improvement Aeronautics | Airport PURCHASE SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan Overview of Final FY20-24 CIP
    FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan Overview of Final FY20-24 CIP 6/10/2019 Final FY20-24 CIP Agenda 1. Recap of the FY20-24 CIP process and where we are today 2. Summary and analysis of public input process and comments received 3. Review overall FY20-24 CIP by funding source, priority, program and mode 4. Discuss CIP programming as compared to MBTA spend targets 5. FY20 Capital Program Key Performance Indicators 6. Next Steps Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 2 Final FY20-24 CIP FY20-24 CIP Process Recap • Develop initial estimates of capital funding sources January • Collect project proposals from MBTA Departments • Begin scoring and evaluation process • Set initial program sizes (presented to FMCB 2/4) February • Continue scoring and evaluation of new proposals • Update cash flow forecasts for existing projects • Prioritize new projects based on scoring and evaluation March • Develop initial project list – combine existing and new projects • Refine sources and sequencing for draft project list April • Present updated funding sources and draft uses to FMCB • Finalize draft FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan May • Present to FMCB on May 13, CPC May 15, Joint Bd May 20 • Post draft CIP for comment; engage public through multiple avenues • Incorporate public comment in CIP June • Present final CIP for vote: FMCB June 10, CPC June 12, Joint Bd June 17 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 3 Final FY20-24 CIP: Public Input Public Input Process and CIP Public Meeting Schedule CIP Public Meeting Schedule (MBTA Service Area) • BOSTON
    [Show full text]
  • System-Wide Accessibility and the Design Guide to Access
    System-Wide Accessibility and The Design Guide to Access Transportation Agencies Liaison Committee Wednesday, June 20th, 2018 • System-Wide Accessibility: Who is presenting today? Laura Brelsford Assistant General Manager System-Wide Accessibility, MBTA Kathryn Quigley Deputy Director of Strategic Planning System-Wide Accessibility, MBTA • System-Wide Accessibility: What is the SWA Mission? To support the MBTA’s accessibility vision to consistently create and maintain a responsive, safe, reliable, human-centered and inclusive public transportation system for all its customers. • System-Wide Accessibility: How does SWA do that? • Clearinghouse of Subject Matter Expertise regarding access- related regulations and best practices • Reviews all customer-facing policies and procedures • Reviews all Design & Construction plans and projects • Oversees Internal Access Monitoring Program • Tracks disposition of all access-related customer complaints • Tracks settlement compliance and sets future Access Initiatives • System-Wide Accessibility: Why is SWA work important? • 1 in 5 Americans qualifies as having a disability • 40% of people aged 65 and older have one or more disabilities • By 2030, nearly 1/3 of the population in the Boston MPO region will be over 60 years of age • Demographics will make MBTA system access an imperative operational need • System-Wide Accessibility: What is the state of the system? Accessible Rapid Transit = Currently 72% Accessible Commuter Rail Station Accessibility = Currently 74% Accessible • System-Wide Accessibility: State of Subway Inaccessible Percentage of Line Stations Total Stations Inaccessible Stations Blue 1 12 8% Green (Subway) 3* 14 23% Green (Surface) 32** 53 58% Orange 0 20 0% Red 1*** 22 5% Mattapan Trolley 1 8 14% Total 38 129 29% *Green Line Subway – Hynes and Symphony in design ** Green Line Surface – Babcock, BU West, Pleasant, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Station
    MBTA ATM/Branding Opportunities 43 ATM Locations Available Line City Station Available Spaces Station Entries Blue East Boston Airport 1 7,429 Blue Revere Revere Beach 1 3,197 Blue Revere Wonderland 1 6,105 Blue East Boston Maverick 1 10,106 Blue Boston Aquarium 1 4,776 Green Boston Prudential 2 3,643 Green Boston Kenmore 1 9,503 Green Newton Riverside 1 2,192 Green Boston Haymarket 1 11,469 Green Boston North Station 1 17,079 Orange Boston Forest Hills 2 15,150 Orange Boston Jackson Square 2 5,828 Orange Boston Ruggles 1 10,433 Orange Boston Stony Brook 2 3,652 Orange Malden Oak Grove 1 6,590 Orange Medford Wellington 1 7,609 Orange Charlestown Community College 1 4,956 Orange Somerville Assembly 1 * Red Boston South Station 1 23,703 Red Boston Charles/MGH 1 12,065 Red Cambridge Alewife 2 11,221 Red Cambridge Harvard 1 23,199 Red Quincy Quincy Adams 3 4,785 Red Quincy Wollaston 2 4,624 Red Boston Downtown Crossing 2 23,478 Red Somerville Davis Square 2 12,857 Red Cambridge Kendall/MIT 1 15,433 Red Cambridge Porter Square 1 8,850 Red Dorchester Ashmont 2 9,293 Silver Boston World Trade Center 1 1,574 Silver Boston Courthouse 1 1,283 Commuter Boat Hingham Hingham Intermodal Terminal 1 ** * Assembly Station opened September 2, 2014. Ridership numbers are now being established ** The Hingham Intermodal Terminal is scheduled to open December 2015 . ATM proposals /branding are subject to MBTA design review and approval. Blue Line- Airport Station K-2 Blue Line- Revere Beach Station Map K-1 Charlie Card Machine Charlie Card Collectors Machines
    [Show full text]
  • Unofficial City/Town Names
    The following information is categorized line by line into three or four sections for each community listed, as follows: Unofficial name.../ a locality in, or part of a Town(s)or CITY (in caps).../ County... /Also known as, or other notation. Unofficial Name City or Town County Aka or comment Abbott Village Andover Essex aka Frye village Abbotville North Reading Middlesex Aberdeen BOSTON Suffolk in Brighton Academy Hill BOSTON Suffolk in Brighton Academy Hill Westminster Worcester Acapesket Falmouth Barnstable Accord Norwell & Hingham Plymouth P.O. & locality a.k.a. Queen Anne's Corner, Queen Anne, Queen Ann's, Queen Ann Corners Acoaxet Westport Bristol Post Office & locality Acre Clinton Middlesex Acushnet Station NEW BEDFORD Bristol former train station Adamsdale North Attleborough Bristol Post Office & locality, a.k.a Lanesville Adams Shore QUINCY Norfolk Adamsville Colrain Franklin Adamsville Milton Norfolk AGAWAM Wareham Plymouth Akins Corner Westport Bristol Alandar Mt. Washington Berkshire Albee Corners Charlton Worcester Albeeville Mendon Worcester Aldenville CHICOPEE Hampden Post Office & locality Aldrich Wilmington Middlesex Aldrich District Uxbridge Worcester Aldrich Lake Granby Hampden aka Granby Hollow Aldrich Village Millbury Worcester Algeria Otis Berkshire Allendale PITTSFIELD Berkshire Allen's Corner Amesbury Essex Allen's Corner Walpole Norfolk Allenville WOBURN Middlesex Allerton Hull Plymouth Allston BOSTON Suffolk Almont Tewksbury Middlesex former train station Alpine Place FRANKLIN Norfolk Amostown West Springfield
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming MBTA and Commuter Rail Diversions • Diversions, of Note • MBTA Bus Diversions, by Line • Commuter Rail Bus Diversions, by Line
    Bus Diversions May 29, 2018 to October 15, 2018 Fiscal and Management Control Board June 4, 2018 Overview • Diversions • Background • MBTA Diversions, to date • Commuter Rail Diversions, to date • Upcoming MBTA and Commuter Rail Diversions • Diversions, of note • MBTA Bus Diversions, by Line • Commuter Rail Bus Diversions, by Line • Communication with the Customer • Strategy • Pre-Closure & During • On the Street • In Person • Appendix • Bus Diversions, by Month (June to October 15, 2018) 2 Background The Authority will complete $850M in construction projects this summer, between June 1, 2018 and October 15, 2018. • To complete this work, we partner with three third-party vendors to provide diversion service. The vendors are Yankee, Peter Pan and Paul Revere. • Depending on the construction, four types/categories of diversions can be coordinated: • Urban short-term, weekend work: Longfellow Bridge • Urban mid-term, full week/weekend work: Commonwealth Avenue • Urban long-term, full week/weekend work: Wollaston Station • Suburban/Rural, weekend work: PTC 3 MBTA Diversions, to date Planned Highlights • Beverly Drawbridge • Replacement of 132-year old Beverly Drawbridge • Wollaston Station Reconstruction • Installation of power cables, lighting, and Quincy Center Garage fencing, and security equipment and Demolition welding rails on the Longfellow Bridge • Early Access • $92.9M Wollaston Station Reconstruction • Three Stop Shuttle and Quincy Center Garage Demolition • Longfellow Bridge • Replace the eastbound side of the Commonwealth Avenue Bridge • Commonwealth Avenue, Phase I Unplanned • Snow Support 4 Commuter Rail Diversions, to date Planned Highlights • PTC: • 93, Equipment on Locomotives • Newburyport/Rockport • 58, Equipment on Control Cars • Haverhill • 43.8, miles of Fiber • Lowell • 109, Wayside Radios • Franklin • 1,451, ACSES Transponders • Stoughton • Dock repairs to Hingham Ferry Dock in • Wollaston Station and Quincy January 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Mbta Systemwide Passenger Data Collection Program
    / AMHERST^ * r UMASS/ 1 || m BlEObb OEfll b21b 7 AL D D 26 MBTA SYSTEMWIDE PASSENGER DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM 1 VOLUME : Rapid Transit System &U COLLECTION OCT OlW Massachusetts University or Depository Copy April, 1981 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/mbtasystemwidepa01cara Boston Region MBTA SYSTEMWIDE PASSENGER DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM Volume 1 Rapid Transit System April, 1981 This document was prepared by CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF, an interagency transportation planning staff created and directed by the Metropolitan Planning Organization, consisting of the member agencies. Metropolitan Area Planning Council Executive Office of Transportation and Construction Massachusetts Department of Public Works Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Advisory Board Massachusetts Port Authority 3CSTCN •.':" = .* = :. *-•. - = ?- ".-•:*. •.," . n_n nrps ti in .TORT 26 TITLE ^BTA Systemwide Passenger Data Collection Program Volume 1 - Ra^id Transit System AUTHOR(S) Michael Carakatsane (project manager) and Lawrence Tittemore (Tittemore Associates) DATE April, 1981 ABSTRACT This is the first of two reports summarizing the results of information collected during a 1978 Systemwide Passenger Data Collection Program by the MBTA. This report focuses on the Rapid Transit portion of the system and describes (1) the physical system at the time of the survey, (2) procedures used to collect and process the data, (3) passenger boardings by corridor and by station, (4) socio-economic characteristics (age, sex, occupation, household size, household income, and auto ownership) of riders by corridor, and (5) travel characteristics (trip purpose, fare type, frequency of usage, mode of access and station destination) of riders by corridor. A second report summarizing similar information for the bus portion of the system will be prepared as Volume 2 Also, subsequent memoranda are expected to be prepared to document more detailed analysis of specific items of interest to the MBTA.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation
    The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 1 The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation COMMISSIONED BY AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2013 COVER: MOCKINGBIRD STATION, DALLAS, TX Photo by DART CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3 Previous Research 6 Findings 8 Phoenix 12 Chicago 17 Boston 23 Minneapolis-St. Paul 27 San Francisco 32 Conclusion 33 Methodology THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors: Center for Neighborhood Technology Lead Author: Sofia Becker Scott Bernstein, Linda Young Analysis: Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Al Benedict, and Cindy Copp Report Contributors and Reviewers: Center for Neighborhood Technology: Peter Haas, Stephanie Morse American Public Transportation Association: Darnell Grisby National Association of Realtors: Darren W. Smith Report Layout: Center for Neighborhood Technology Kathrine Nichols THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 Executive Summary Fueled by demographic change and concerns over quality of life, there has been a growing interest in communities with active transportation modes. The recession added another dimension to these discussions by emphasizing the economic impli- cations of transportation choices. Housing and transportation, the two economic sectors mostly closely tied to the built environment, were both severely impacted by the economic downturn. There has been a growing effort among planners, real estate professionals, and economists to identify not only the economic benefits of alternative transportation modes in and of themselves, but also the impact that they have on housing prices and value retention.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit
    Technical Appendix Proposed Baldwin 2 Section Pk-8 School Brookline, Massachusetts Prepared for: Jonathan Levi Architects Boston, Massachusetts Vanasse & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers & Planners 35 New England Business Center Drive Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810-1066 Fares LOWELL LINE HAVERHILL LINE NEWBURYPORT/ OL ROCKPORT LINE Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority OAK GROVE Lynn + + Rapid Transit/Key Bus Routes Map West Woodlawn Medford 116 Malden Center BL Rapid Transit 111 WONDERLAND Rapid Bus + Rapid RL PRICE PER TRIP Local Bus Bus + Bus Wellington Revere Center Transit Transit ALEWIFE Chelsea 117 Effective September 2, 2018 Arlington Revere Heights 77 Assembly Beach Box District CharlieCard $1.70 $1.70 $2.25 $2.25 Davis Beachmont 77 Sullivan Sq Eastern Waltham Ave CharlieTicket $2.00 $2.00 $2.75 $4.75*** Waverley Belmont Community CHELSEA Suffolk Downs Porter College Bellingham Sq SL3 FITCHBURG LINE 116 Cash-on-Board $2.00 $4.00 $2.75 $4.75*** SL3 Orient Heights 73 GL Charlestown 117 Harvard LECHMERE Navy Yard 71 73 E Student/Youth* $0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 71 Wood Island Watertown IN N Sq Science Park/West End E E Union Sq R 1 H Airport Watertown (Allston) A Senior/TAP** $0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 R Yard 57 66 B North Station 111 O R Central 57 WORCESTER LINE Harvard Ave Long C, E Maverick UNLIMITED TRIP PASSES Wharf F SL1 E Blue Line Griggs St Packards Corner BOWDOIN North R R Rental Kendall/MIT Y Car Center Allston St BL 1-Day $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 Babcock St 1 Haymarket Warren St C, E Newtonville Pleasant St Gov’t.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Program Update: FY18 Recap and FY19 Look Ahead
    Capital Program Update: FY18 Recap and FY19 Look Ahead October 1, 2018 MBTA Capital Program Update FY 2018 Recap Capital Program FY18 Goals FY18 Accomplishments • Invested $1.0B in capital program ($875M cash + $150M accrued work) 1) Execute approved FY18-FY22 Capital Investment Plan (CIP) • Achieved 93% of FY18 Plan • Awarded $2.1 billion in capital contracts • Awarded $639M in SGR construction contracts 2) Lead the development of a FY19-23 Capital • Developed and funded $8.0B 5-year Plan Investment Plan that helps advance the MBTA’s strategic priorities and achieve • Tied programs to specific strategic imperatives meaningful outcomes for customers • Every new project is in PMIS as of 7/1/18 3) Improve project controls, reporting, and processes and implement enterprise-wide • ~150 FY 19-23 CIP projects in PMIS project management information system • 592 total users in PMIS (PMIS) • 372,000 documents uploaded • ~140 training sessions held Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 2 FY 2018 Capital Program Recap In 2018, the MBTA invested $875M in its capital program and achieved 93% of FY18 Plan. MBTA Capital Investment $1,000 Cash only $875 (in millions) $811 $768 $800 $748 $155 $102 $631 $246 $600 $246 $162 $400 $720 $709 Spend inMillions $ $522 $469 $502 $200 $- FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 State of Good Repair Expansion . Total MBTA capital investment FY14-18: $3.8 billion . $2.9 Billion for State of Good Repair . MBTA projected capital investment FY19-23: $8.0 billion . $6.7 billion for State of Good Repair Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 3 FY 2018 Capital Program Recap FY 2018 YTD Total Capital Investment, including accrued work Capital work More accurately complete but not captures total FY18 yet paid investment $1,200M ~$150M $1,025M 1,000 $875M 800 600 400 200 0 FY18 YTD FY18 YTD Work Accrued Total FY18 Cash Expenditure on Key Programs Capital Investment * Assumes accrued work occurred in FY18.
    [Show full text]
  • Remediation General Permit NOI, MBTA Wollaston Station, Quincy, MA
    MAG910000 Appendix IV – Part 1 – NOI NHG910000 Page 17 of 24 2. Activity Category: (check all that apply) 3. Contamination Type Category: (check all that apply) a. If Activity Category I or II: (check all that apply) □ A. Inorganics □ B. Non-Halogenated Volatile Organic Compounds □ C. Halogenated Volatile Organic Compounds □ D. Non-Halogenated Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds □ E. Halogenated Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds □ F. Fuels Parameters □ I – Petroleum-Related Site Remediation □ II – Non-Petroleum-Related Site Remediation b. If Activity Category III, IV, V, VI, VII or VIII: (check either G or H) □ III – Contaminated Site Dewatering □ G. Sites with Known □ H. Sites with Unknown Contamination □ IV – Dewatering of Pipelines and Tanks Contamination □ V – Aquifer Pump Testing c. If Category III-G, IV-G, V-G, VI-G, □ VI – Well Development/Rehabilitation VII-G or VIII-G: (check all that apply) □ VII – Collection Structure Dewatering/Remediation □ VIII – Dredge-Related Dewatering □ A. Inorganics □ B. Non-Halogenated Volatile Organic Compounds d. If Category III-H, IV-H, V-H, VI-H, VII-H or □ C. Halogenated Volatile Organic VIII-H Contamination Type Categories A through Compounds F apply □ D. Non-Halogenated Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds □ E. Halogenated Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds □ F. Fuels Parameters MAG910000 Appendix IV – Part 1 – NOI NHG910000 Page 18 of 24 4. Influent and Effluent Characteristics Known Known Influent Effluent Limitations Test Detection or or # of Parameter method limit Daily Daily believed believed samples (#) (µg/l) maximum average TBEL WQBEL absent present (µg/l) (µg/l) A. Inorganics Ammonia Report mg/L --- Chloride Report µg/l --- Total Residual Chlorine 0.2 mg/L Total Suspended Solids 30 mg/L Antimony 206 µg/L Arsenic 104 µg/L Cadmium 10.2 µg/L Chromium III 323 µg/L Chromium VI 323 µg/L Copper 242 µg/L Iron 5,000 µg/L Lead 160 µg/L Mercury 0.739 µg/L Nickel 1,450 µg/L Selenium 235.8 µg/L Silver 35.1 µg/L Zinc 420 µg/L Cyanide 178 mg/L B.
    [Show full text]