DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Authority Submissions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Authority Submissions Public Authority Submissions Formal written responses have been received from all of the public authorities that Council was required to consult with by the Gateway Determination, except Government Property NSW (formerly the State Property Authority). Submissions have also been received from a number of other public authorities. Summary of Issues The Gateway Determination issued by the Department of Planning and Infrastructure required Council to consult with (at least) the following authorities: Transport for NSW; Roads and Maritime Services; Office of Environment and Heritage; Sydney Catchment Authority; Department of Education and Communities; State Property Authority; Housing NSW; NSW Rural Fire Service; Commonwealth Department of Infrastructure and Transport; Office of Strategic Lands; Adjoining LGAs Formal written responses have been received from all of the above authorities, except Government Property NSW (formerly the State Property Authority). Submissions have however been received from Crown Lands relating to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure‟s property holdings. The Commonwealth Department of Infrastructure and Transport indicated that it did not wish to make a submission, as did Campbelltown City Council. In addition to the above authorities, Council has also received submissions from the following authorities: Sydney Water Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) NSW Transport – Railcorp Ausgrid Department of Defence (Commonwealth) Department of Health – South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Department of Primary Industries – Fisheries NSW NSW Trade and Investment – Crown Lands NSW Heritage Council Public Authority Submissions Page | 1 Analysis of Submissions The submission received from Rockdale City Council indicated general support for the DSSLEP2013. The comments and requests contained in the submissions received from the other authorities are detailed in this section of the report. These have been grouped together as follows: Zoning; Development Controls; Heritage, Acquisitions and Policy Matters. Zoning Support for the proposed zones, and application of the zone to specific parcels of land was expressed by the following authorities: Housing and Property Group (NSW Finance and Services): Supports the proposed rezoning of 9 Hopman Avenue, Menai from Zone 13 - Public Open Space to E4 Environmental Living and the inclusion of dual occupancies and multi dwelling housing in the L2 Low Density Residential zone. Office of Strategic Lands: Supports the proposed zonings attached to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure‟s landholdings Ausgrid: Supports the proposed zoning of its landholdings, except those identified later in this section of the report. Sydney Water: Supports the proposed zoning of its landholdings, except those identified later in this section of the report. Sydney Catchment Authority: Supports SP2 Infrastructure (Water Supply) over the Woronora Special Area and Dam, as well as the permissible uses in this zone. Fisheries NSW: Supports the proposed W1 Natural Waterways zone and W2 Recreational Waterways zones and the associated lists of permitted and prohibited development. It also notes that the proposed E1 National Parks and Nature Reserves zone provides good protection for the two aquatic reserves in the estuaries, but that Boat Harbour doesn‟t seem to have the same level of protection. (Boat Harbour Aquatic Reserve is located outside the LGA boundary, so does not form part of the land to which the DSSLEP2013 applies). Crown Lands: Supports the proposed zoning of commercial marinas as W2 Recreational Waterways and that Council has accommodated a range of allied boating facilities within this zone. E4 Environmental Living The Rural Fire Service submission notes the proposed use of the E4 zone. It provides advice that within this zone, consideration should be given to ensuring appropriate access is available to the lots. The submission also advises that where an increase in density or a special fire protection purpose development is permissible, roads should provide satisfactory level of service for evacuation. The RFS also notes that an adequate water supply will be needed to supply developments or areas with water for fire services. Public Authority Submissions Page | 2 This advice is consistent with the approach adopted in the application of the E4 Environmental Living zone, which aims to limit an increase in density in the zone, and prohibit the development of any new special fire protection purposes development in the zone so as to ensure that there is a sufficient opportunity for evacuation from existing development. No amendment to the DSSLEP2013 is required. E2 Environmental Conservation The submission from the Office of Environment and Heritage indicates its support for the application of E2 Environmental Conservation zone to protect areas of high environmental value, particularly areas currently zoned 7(b) Environmental Protection (Bushland) under SSLEP2000, some land zoned Zone 13 – Public Open Space and Zone 14 – Public Open Space (Bushland) and other land covered by Kurnell Peninsula SEPP. The submission also expresses concerns about the subjectivity of terms e.g. „environmentally sensitive‟, „bushland of conservation value‟, natural bushland corridors‟ etc used to describe land proposed to be zoned E2. The submission recommends more details be provided on the criteria applied in translating these areas to the E2 zone. OEH has also expressed concern that the current protection of the areas of high environmental value achieve by current zoning may be lost if the RE1 Public Recreation zone is applied to this land. This comment is assumed to relate to the explanation of the application of the land proposed to be zoned E2 in the Planning Proposal, particularly privately owned land. As explained in the Planning Proposal, Sutherland Shire has significant areas of privately owned land which is currently zoned 7(b) Environmental Protection (Bushland) under SSLEP2000. This land has had extremely limited development potential since the introduction of the County of Cumberland Planning Scheme Ordinance in 1951 due to its topographical constraints, and is subject to extreme bushfire risk and contains ecological communities of significance. This land was deferred from SSLEP2006, as at the time the Department of Planning and Infrastructure considered that the proposed environmental protection zoning in draft SSLEP2004 was too restrictive. The DP&I advised that "…excluding the land from LEP2006 will enable council to review the list of permissible uses, and identify any land which should be acquired for open space." The Department of Planning & Industry has offered no sensible solution to how this land is best dealt with under the Standard Instrument. The sensible zone to apply is E2 Environmental Conservation as this best reflects the environmental significance of the land, the constraints to development and the existing objectives of the 7(b) Environmental Protection (Bushland) zone. It is not considered appropriate to apply the RE1 Public Recreation zone to the land as it does not provide the same level of environmental protection as at E2 zone, nor does Council have the funds to acquire this land. The submission is noted. Public Authority Submissions Page | 3 Permissibility of Aquaculture The Fisheries NSW submission highlights that the State Environmental Planning Policy No 62 – Sustainable Aquaculture (SEPP 62) controls the permissibility of aquaculture. The submission advises Council, on behalf of Fisheries NSW and the Department of Planning and Infrastructure, not to list pond-based and tank based aquaculture or oyster aquaculture in the zoning tables as permissibility is governed by SEPP 62. Specifically, the submission requests the following amendments: Removal of „aquaculture‟ from the uses permitted with consent in the IN1 General Industrial Zone Removal of „aquaculture‟ from the uses permitted with consent in the IN4 Working Waterfront zone Inclusion of „aquaculture‟ as a use permissible with consent in suitable waterways zones so that natural water based aquaculture can be considered on a case by case basis, until SEPP 62 is amended to cover this type of aquaculture. Aquaculture is listed as permissible with consent in the W1 Natural Waterways, W2 Recreational Waterways and E1 National Parks and Nature Reserves zones, so no action is required in relation to waterways zones. The requests relating to the IN1 and IN4 zones are supported. No action is required in relation to the waterways zones. ANSTO ANSTO has made a submission to the DSSLEP indicating that although it is exempt from Council‟s approval process, it prefers to work with Council‟s planning guidelines. The submission states that in many cases the proposed zoning will not impact on ANSTOs future plans, the proposed zoning of a large portion of its land as RE1 Public Recreation is not appropriate as under the future development intentions of ANSTO, this site may not be available for public access or able to accommodate the full range of uses which are permissible in the zone. ANSTO requests an alternative zoning that will accommodate ANSTO‟s future development plans as envisaged in the ANSTO 2055 plan, including a technology park and education facilities. It submits that having the appropriate zone will become important as the existing waste land fill program draws to a close and smaller lease areas are returned to ANSTO for science and technology. Most of the ANSTO land is proposed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greater Parramatta and the Olympic Peninsula Is the the Way We All Imagine Greater Sydney
    Greater Our true centre: the connected, Parramatta and the unifying heart GPOP Olympic Peninsula About Us The Greater Sydney Commission (the Commission) was established by the NSW Government to lead metropolitan planning for Greater Sydney. This means the Commission plays a co-ordinating role in economic, social and environmental planning across the whole of Greater Sydney. The Commission has specific roles and responsibilities, such as producing District Plans, the Metropolitan Strategy and identifying infrastructure priorities. Collaboration and engagement are at the core of everything the Commission does. We work across government, with communities, interest groups, institutions, business and investors to ensure that planning for Greater Sydney results in a productive, liveable and sustainable future city. October 2016 FOREWORD CHIEF COMMISSIONER’S DISTRICT COMMISSIONER’S FOREWORD FOREWORD It’s time for a change of perspective and a change in Greater Parramatta and the Olympic Peninsula is the the way we all imagine Greater Sydney. geographic and demographic heart of Greater Sydney, Today, more than 2 million people live west of Sydney and a key part of the West Central District. Olympic Park, yet everyday around 300,000 people We have the opportunity to shape the transformation leave the region to travel for work. of the place we now call GPOP. Greater Sydney needs a true city at its centre, close Global best practice shows that a co-ordinated to its heart. We need a central ‘30-minute city’, that is approach to public and private investment is critical connected to the north, south, east and west. for successful transformation, involving innovation and GPOP is the name we have given to the Greater enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Housing More Affordable
    MAKING HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE Housing Affordability Task Force Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW At the beginning of 2017, the Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW (UDIA NSW) established a Housing Affordability Task Force to deliver an action plan aimed at addressing the housing affordability crisis in NSW. UDIA NSW would like to thank the task force members for their input into the action plan. UDIA NSW Housing Affordability Task Force Members Mike Scott (Chair), The Treadstone Company Arthur Ilias, Lendlease / UDIA NSW President Nicole Woodrow, Task Force Program Manager Stephen Abolakian, Hyecorp Toby Adams, Charter Keck Cramer Gerry Beasley, Walker Corporation Michael Corcoran, UDIA National President Rod Fehring, Frasers Property Australia Andrea Galloway, Evolve Housing Ian Harrison, St George Bank Shane Geha, EG Property Peter Howman, Development Services Advisory Toby Long, Mirvac Jennifer Macquarie, The Housing Trust Richard Rhydderch, Stockland Dominic Sullivan, Payce Nick Tobin, Aqualand Sara Watts, City West Housing Officers Steve Mann, UDIA CEO Justin Drew, UDIA NSW GM Policy and Corporate Affairs MAKING HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE 1 CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 2 Purpose 3 The Problem – Aligning Supply and Demand 3.1 Housing Supply Drivers 3.2 Housing Demand 3.3 Identification of the Problem – Housing Supply and Affordability Reform 4 The Solution – Fix the Housing Supply Chain 4.1 Co-ordination of Housing Supply and Supporting Infrastructure 4.2 Diversity 4.3 Productivity and Efficiency 4.3.1 Uncertain Timeframes
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydneymeets East Londonnorth & South of the Thames
    Western Sydney meets East London North & South of the Thames Steering Committee and delegate bios W: westernsydney.org.au | A: PO Box 3201 North Parramatta NSW 1750 Australia September 2019 | Page 1 Western Sydney meets East London North & South of the Thames Study tour Steering Committee - bios Christopher Brown AM Chairman and Founder, Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue Christopher retired as Pro Chancellor of Western Sydney University after eight years as a Trustee and Director, in mid-2019. He continues to serve on the boards of the Western Sydney University Academy and External Affairs Committee. Having served on dozens of government boards over 30 years, he was a member of the Federal/State commission that chose the Badgerys Creek Airport site and then devised an advocacy campaign to secure Cabinet support. He served on the NSW Transport & Planning Blueprint Panel that first recognised Parramatta as Sydney’s second CBD and advises News Corp’s ‘Go West/Project Sydney’ editorial campaign. Christopher chaired the WestLine Partnership, which secured a light rail connection in the Olympic Corridor, and the Western Sydney Rail Alliance, which secured $5+ billion to build north/south rail connections to Badgerys Creek. He was founding Convenor of the Parramatta Partnership Forum and the Committee for Liverpool, and now manages the Canterbury-Bankstown Forum and Advance Blacktown civic leadership forums. He chairs the South Western Sydney Local Health Advisory Board and served as an adviser to the Western Sydney Parklands. Raised and educated in Parramatta, he was awarded Australian Honours for services to industry and community in 2014. Leanne Bloch-Jorgensen Head of Thought Leadership and Insights, Corporate and Institutional Bank, National Australia Bank Leanne has spent more than 25 years in the banking and finance sector, having held a variety of strategic and transactional roles in both major domestic and boutique investment banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney 2050: Today's Planning for Tomorrow's Sydney
    Sydney 2050: Today's planning for tomorrow's Sydney Friday 14 September 2018, 12.00pm to 2.00pm Shangri-La Hotel, Sydney EVENT SUPPORTING SPONSOR www.ceda.com.au agenda 11.45am Registrations 12.00pm Welcome Lee Kelly State Director NSW/ACT, CEDA 12.05pm Introduction Philip Davies Partner, Infrastructure Advisory, Deloitte 12.15pm Keynote address The Hon. Anthony Roberts MP NSW Minister for Planning, NSW Minister for Housing, Special Minister of State 12.40pm Lunch 1.05pm Introduction Philip Davies 1.10pm Keynote Address Clover Moore Lord Mayor, City of Sydney 1.30pm Moderated discussion and questions 1.55pm Vote of thanks Philip Davies Partner, Infrastructure Advisory, Deloitte 2.00pm Close Lee Kelly State Director NSW/ACT, CEDA sponsor Event supporting sponsor The Star Entertainment Group The Star Entertainment Group is an ASX 100 listed company that owns and operates The Star Sydney, The Star Gold Coast and Treasury Brisbane. The Star Entertainment Group has also acquired the Sheraton Grand Mirage on the Gold Coast in a joint venture and manages the Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre on behalf of the Queensland Government. In November 2015, the company name changed from Echo Entertainment Group to The Star Entertainment Group as part of a transition to a single brand architecture across the group. Underpinned by the multi-billion dollar transformational projects planned or in progress at our properties, the unified brand is integral to The Star Entertainment Group’s vision to become Australia’s leading integrated resort company. The Star Entertainment Group is committed to optimising its properties, supporting the communities in which we operate, and capitalising on the opportunities presented by our world-class locations in Sydney, Brisbane and Gold Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Electorates for Women's Council Elections - 2019
    ELECTORATES FOR WOMEN'S COUNCIL ELECTIONS - 2019 ELECTORATE 1 - HIGHER EDUCATION (2 delegates) AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY TAFE NSW UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY OF NSW UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ELECTORATE 2 – DISABILITY SERVICES (1 delegate) ACHIEVE AUSTRALIA ARUMA (formerly HWNS) AUSTRALIAN UNITY CEREBRAL PALSY ALLIANCE DISABILITY SERVICES AUSTRALIA HUNTER VALLEY DISABILITY LIFE WITHOUT BARRIERS LIVE BETTER MID NORTH COAST NORTHCOTT THE BENEVOLENT SOCIETY THE DISABILITY TRUST ELECTORATE 3 – OTHER NATIONAL SYSTEMS (1 delegate) ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL NSW AGL MACQUARIE AUSGRID COAL SERVICES PTY LTD CORRECTIVE SERVICES – MTC BROADSPECTRUM DELTA ELECTRICITY EMPLOYED SOLICITORS ENERGY AUSTRALIA NSW ERARING (ORIGIN) FORESTRY CORPORATION FSS TRUSTEE CORPORATION GREYHOUND RACING HARNESS RACING AUTHORITY LAND REGISTRY SERVICES MERCER ADMINISTRATION SERVICES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD. MURRAY IRRIGATION MURRUMBIDGEE IRRIGATION LTD MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART NATIONAL ART SCHOOL NATIONAL HEAVY VEHICLE REGULATOR NIDA PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TRANSGRID UNIVERSITIES ADMISSIONS CENTRE WATERNSW ELECTORATE 4 – STRONGER COMMUNITIES – FACS and HEALTH (2 delegates) CHILDREN’S GUARDIAN, OFFICE of the COMMUNITY SERVICES FACS – DISABILITY FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (CENTRAL OFFICE), DEPT. OF (including Corporate Services, Business HOUSING NSW MULTICULTURAL
    [Show full text]
  • Call to Arms Over Outsourcing Operations Falling Into the Hands Morony Correctional Centre Will of the Private Sector
    Public Service Association of NSW Post Office approved PP 255003/01563 ISSN 1030–0740 Red TapeJanuary–April 2016 www.psa.asn.au PSA confronts private jail plans The State Government’s obsession with privatisation continues, this time with plans to 'market test' the operations of NSW prisons. However, the PSA’s Steve on performance targets for the state’s inmate population passes MacMahon is not convinced. first time” and “an independent 12,000. “We have been trying to work consultant has been engaged to Interview on the ABC, Minister with the Baird Government in analyse public prison operations Elliot described NSW prisons as “a fixing the overcrowding crisis in in NSW and compare them to the growth industry”. our jails, but this is purely about private sector as well as public As the Government ponders more selling off public assets to get prisons in Queensland”. privatised options, a report from their hands on more money.” However, the benchmarking the University of Sydney has found privatised prisons “will not lead to In a recent performance audit, process will not apply to the John increased public accountability”. Corrective Services NSW Morony prison, which is going was urged to “complete its straight to ‘market testing’. “There are many instances of benchmarking exercise on public private prison failure,” reads The correctional centre performance”. The Government’s moves, teamed Costs of Commissioning by Associate with a boost in bed numbers in The report found that “individual Professor Jane Andrew, Dr Max Berrima and Cessnock, come at Baker and Dr Philip Roberts. public correctional centre a time when prison numbers are performance could not be “Recent examples include the determined as correctional skyrocketing.
    [Show full text]
  • Landcom Annual Report 2018 III Macarthur Heights Minister’S Letter
    Annual Report 2018 Creating more affordable and sustainable communities Tallawong Station Precinct South concept, Sydney Metro Northwest Places Program (this image is an artist’s impression, indicative only and subject to change without notice) Contents Minister’s letter 1 Chair’s Review 2 Chief Executive Officer’s Review 4 Board of Directors 6 Executive Committee 8 Our organisation 12 Project map 13 Our governance structure 15 FY18 economic and financial highlights 16 Highlights of this year’s achievements 17 Sustainability 25 Community engagement 26 Research and learning 27 Looking ahead to FY19 30 Our charter and function 32 Corporate governance 33 Measuring people performance 41 Risk management 42 Public access to information and the protection of privacy 43 Legal events 48 Work health and safety 49 Multicultural policies and services program 50 Workforce diversity performance 52 Our guarantee of service 54 Executive positions 56 Miscellaneous activities 58 Disclosure of approved exemptions 59 Financial statements 63 Index 107 Corporate directory 108 Cover image: Oran Park Library Landcom Annual Report 2018 III Macarthur Heights Minister’s letter 31 October 2018 The Hon Dominic Perrottet MP Treasurer and Minister for Industrial Relations 52 Martin Place Sydney NSW 2000 The Hon Victor Dominello MP Minister for Finance, Services and Property 52 Martin Place Sydney NSW 2000 Dear Treasurer and Minister We are pleased to submit to you the Annual Report for Landcom for the year ended 30 June 2018 for presentation to the Parliament of New South Wales. The report details the performance, operations and financial results of Landcom and has been prepared in accordance with section 24A of the State Owned Corporations Act 1989, the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Act 1984 and the applicable provisions of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Houses Trust of NSW, Incorporating Sydney Living Museums, Cares for Significant Historic Places, Buildings, Landscapes and Collections
    The Historic Houses Trust of NSW, incorporating Sydney Living Museums, cares for significant historic places, buildings, landscapes and collections. It is a statutory authority of, and principally funded by, the New South Wales Government. ANNUAL REPORT 2015–2016 HISTORIC HOUSES TRUST OF NEW SOUTH WALES The Hon Mark Speakman SC MP Minister for the Environment, Minister for Heritage, and Assistant Minister for Planning Level 15, 52 Martin Place SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear Minister On behalf of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with the provisions of the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Act 1984, the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983 and the Public Finance and Audit Regulation 2015, we submit for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report of Sydney Living Museums under the statutory authority of the Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales for the year ending 30 June 2016. Yours sincerely Michael Rose AM Mark Goggin Chairman Executive Director The Historic Houses Trust of NSW, SYDNEY LIVING MUSEUMS T 02 8239 2288 incorporating Sydney Living Head Office F 02 8239 2299 Museums, cares for significant historic The Mint E [email protected] places, buildings, landscapes and 10 Macquarie Street TTY 02 8239 2377 collections. It is a statutory authority Sydney NSW 2000 (telephone for people of, and principally funded by, with hearing disabilities) the NSW Government. This report and all our programs are published on our website sydneylivingmuseums.com.au CONTENTS CONTENTS From the Chairman 2 From the Executive Director 3 OUR ACHIEVEMENTS 4 CORPORATE PLAN 5 PERFORMANCE 6 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS 7 1 Involvement 8 2 Access & enjoyment 16 3 Conservation & curatorship 36 4 Stability 48 5 Wellbeing 54 6 Knowledge 56 OUR ORGANISATION 64 Who we are 65 Our museums 66 Our properties 70 Our collections 71 Endangered Houses Fund 72 Corporate governance 74 Foundation for the Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales 86 APPENDICES 89 HHT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 105 Contacts 166 Program supporters & partners 167 Index 168 Corporate Partners 170 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019–2020 Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales
    Annual Report 2019–2020 Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales The Hon Don Harwin MLC Special Minister of State, and Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs, and the Arts Parliament House Macquarie Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear Minister On behalf of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with the provisions of the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Act 1984, the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983 and the Public Finance and Audit Regulation 2015, we submit for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report of Sydney Living Museums under the statutory authority of the Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales for the year ending 30 June 2020. Yours sincerely Naseema Sparks am Adam Lindsay Chair Executive Director The Historic Houses Trust of NSW, incorporating Sydney Living Museums Sydney Living Museums, cares for significant Head Office historic places, buildings, landscapes and The Mint, 10 Macquarie Street collections. It is a statutory authority of, and Sydney NSW 2000 principally funded by, the NSW Government. T 02 8239 2288 E [email protected] This report is published on our website sydneylivingmuseums.com.au 1 ANNUAL REPORT 2019–20 Contents Acknowledgment of Country 4 Operational Plans 48 From the Chair 6 Placemaking, Curation & Collaboration 48 From the Executive Director 7 Public programs 50 Vision, mission, essence, values and approach 8 Learning programs 53 Highlights 2019–20 10 Exhibitions 54 Performance overview 12 Case study – A Thousand Words 58 Visitation 14 Touring exhibition program 61 Research
    [Show full text]
  • FACE OFF How Will the Affordability Crisis Be Solved? #04
    #02 TWENTY SEVENTEEN Developing inspired communities Housing Affordability Special FACE OFF How will the affordability crisis be solved? #04 URBAN ICON IS THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF UDIA NSW Editor: Leo Nelson [email protected] PO BOX Q402 QVB Post Office NSW 2000 T: (02) 9262 1214 F: (02) 9262 1218 W: www.udia-nsw.com.au Publisher PUBLISHED BY: #10 ABN 70010 660 009 Unit 107, 27-33 Nundah St, Nundah QLD 4012 PO Box 406, Nundah Qld 4012 Telephone: (07) 3866 0000 Facsimile: (07) 3866 0066 Email: [email protected] Website: www.tmpc.com.au Views expressed in any article in Urban Icon are those of the individual contributor and not necessarily those of the publisher. The publisher cannot accept any responsibility for any opinions, information, errors or omissions in this publication. To the extent permitted by law, the publisher will not be liable for any damages including, special, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages (including but not limited to economic loss or loss of profit or revenue or loss of opportunity) or indirect loss or damage of any kind arising in contract, tort or otherwise, even if advised of the possibility of such loss of profits or damage. Advertisements must comply with the relevant provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. Responsibility for compliance with the Act rests with the person, company or advertising agency submitting the advertisement. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved. Copyright of articles and photographs of Urban Icon remain with the individual contributors and may not be #16 #24 reproduced without permission. Other material may be reproduced, but only with the permission of The Magazine Publishing Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Project & Submissions Report
    Preferred Project & Submissions Report Collector Wind Farm - March 2013 Level 7 | 116 Miller Street | North Sydney | NSW 2060 | Phone | 61 2 9957 6211 Fax | 61 2 9954 1951 | www.app.com.au No reproduction of this document or any part thereof is permitted without prior written permission of APP Corporation Pty Limited. This report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with our quality control system. The report is preliminary draft unless it © Copyright APP Corporation is signed below. ABN:29 003 764 770 This report has been prepared by : Clair Baxter All rights reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. While we have tried to ensure the accuracy of the information in this publication, the Signature Date : March 2013 Publisher accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions or resultant consequences including loss or damage This report has been reviewed by: Clare Brown arising from reliance in information on this publication. APP Corporation Signature Date : March 2013 www.app.com.au APP Ref : Colector Wind Farm - Preferred Project & Submissions Report 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 9 1.1. Purpose of this Report ...................................................................................... 11 1.2. Summary of the Preferred Project ��������������������������������������������������������������������� 11 1.3. Proposal Benefits .. ............................................................................................ 12 2. Consideration of Submissions 15 2.1. Public Exhibition
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Police Force Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 Thursday, 31 October 2019 The Hon. David Elliott MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services Parliament House Sydney NSW 2000 Dear Minister, I am pleased to submit the NSW Police Force Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2019 for tabling in Parliament. This annual report was prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Annual Reports (Departments) Act 1985 and the Annual Reports (Departments) Regulation 2015. It complies with the standardised reporting formulas for financial statements approved by the Treasurer. Following the report’s tabling in Parliament, it will be available for public access on the NSW Police Force website, www.police.nsw.gov.au. Yours sincerely, Michael Fuller APM Commissioner of Police The NSW Police Force 2018-19 Annual Report was produced by the Office of the Commissioner. There were no external production costs. This report can be downloaded from www.police.nsw.gov.au. ISSN: 1832-3472 © NSW Police Force 2019. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. It may not be reproduced for commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above requires written permission from the Executive Director, Public Affairs Branch, NSW Police Force. 2 NSW Police Force 2018-19 Annual Report Table of contents Commissioner’s foreword 04 Our organisation 05 Year in review 08 How we performed 11 Financial summary 22 Independent auditor’s report 24 Audited
    [Show full text]