DOCSLIB.ORG

Ÿþr E P O R T O F T H E I N T E R N a T I O N a L L a W C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ÿþr E P O R T O F T H E I N T E R N a T I O N a L L a W C Document:- A/CN.4/173 Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its Sixteenth Session, 11 July 1964, Official Records of the General Assembly, Nineteenth Session, Supplement (A/5809) Topic: <multiple topics> Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission:- 1964 , vol. II Downloaded from the web site of the International Law Commission (http://www.un.org/law/ilc/index.htm) Copyright © United Nations REPORT OF THE COMMISSION TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DOCUMENT A/5809* Report of the International Law Commission covering the work of its sixteenth session, 11 May — 24 July 1964 CONTENTS Chapter Paragraphs Page I. ORGANIZATION OF THE SESSION 1-11 173 A. Membership and attendance 2-3 173 B. Officers 4-9 174 C. Agenda 10-11 174 II. LAW OF TREATIES 12-24 174 A. Introduction 12-24 174 B. Draft articles on the law of treaties — 176 III. SPECIAL MISSIONS 25-35 208 A. Introduction 25-35 208 B. Draft articles 1 to 16 and commentary — 210 IV. PROGRAMME OF WORK AND ORGANIZATION OF FUTURE SESSIONS 36-40 226 V. OTHER DECISIONS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE COMMISSION 41-52 226 A. Relations between States and inter-governmental organizations 41-42 226 B. Co-operation with other bodies 43-49 227 C. Date and place of the next session 50 227 D. Representation at the nineteenth session of the General Assembly 51 227 E. Tribute to the Secretary of the Commission 52 227 * Also issued as Official Records of the General Assembly, Nineteenth Session, Supplement No. 9. CHAPTER I A. MEMBERSHIP AND ATTENDANCE Organization of the Session 2- The Commission consists of the following members : 1. The International Law Commission, established ,» ^ , . n> i i MT ODerto A wa in pursuance of General Assembly resolution 174 (II) of ' * S° < W # 21 November 1947, and in accordance with its Statute Mr- Guberto Amado (Brazil) annexed thereto, as subsequently amended, held its Mr. Milan BartoS (Yugoslavia) sixteenth session at the European Office of the United Mr. Herbert W. Briggs (United States of America) Nations, Geneva. The session had been scheduled to last ]^[r Marcel Cadieux (Canada) from 11 May to 17 July and was extended to 24 July X/r — ., nneitrAr% rv^'^n^A\ by a decision adopted by the Commission at its 728th ^ *r* £***? (Fmla^}. meeting of 21 May 1964. The work of the Commission Mr- Abdullah El-Enan (United Arab Republic) during this session is described in this report. Chapter II Mr. Taslim O. Elias (Nigeria) of the report contains nineteen articles on the appli- Mr. Eduardo Jimenez de Arechaga (Uruguay) cation, effects, modification and interpretation of treat- j^r Victor Kanga (Cameroon) ies. Chapter III contains sixteen articles on the topic m Manfred Lachs (pol d) of special missions. Chapter IV relates to the pro- . ' gramme of work and organization of future sessions of Mr# Llu Cnieh (Cnina) the Commission. Chapter V deals with a number of Mr. Antonio de Luna (Spain) administrative and other questions. Mr. Radhabinod Pal (India) 173 174 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II Mr. Angel M. Paredes (Ecuador) had thrust into the foreground the pressing need for the Mr. Obed Pessou (Dahomey) codification and evolution of the law of the community Mr. Paul Reuter (France) of States. The Commission was devoting itself to the Mr. Shabtai Rosenne (Israel) revision, clarification and codification of the main Mr. Jose Maria Ruda (Argentina) topics of international law, where principles demanded to be restated on the basis of the widest possible Mr. Abdul Hakim Tabibi (Afghanistan) agreement of States and on a sound, scientific founda- Mr. Senjin Tsuruoka (Japan) tion, in matters like the law of treaties and State Mr. Grigory I. Tunkin (Union of Soviet Socialist responsibility. The Chairman expressed his conviction Republics) that should the Commission complete its ambitious Mr. Alfred Verdross (Austria) programme, and if the States consummated this work in Sir Humphrey Waldock (United Kingdom of Great diplomatic conferences, progress without precedent since Britain and Northern Ireland) the time of Grotius would have been achieved. Mr. Mustafa Kamil Yasseen (Iraq) 8. The Secretary-General, in reply to the Chairman 3. On 12 May 1964, the Commission elected of the International Law Commission, stated that from Mr. Paul Reuter (France) and Mr. Jose Maria Ruda all available accounts the Commission's work was quite (Argentina) to fill the vacancies which had arisen in impressive. He stressed that one of the basic principles consequence of the election of Mr. Andre Gros (France) of the Charter was that all Member States should prac- and Mr. Luis Padilla Nervo (Mexico) as judges of the tise tolerance, live as good neighbours and unite to- International Court of Justice. wards the achievement of common objectives. He felt confident that the founding fathers of the Charter had in mind the harmonizing of all United Nations activi- B. OFFICERS ties — political, economic, social and legal. 4. At its 722nd meeting, held on 11 May 1964, 9. Mr. Constantin A. Stavropoulos, Legal Counsel, the Commission elected the following officers : attended the 760th meeting, held on 7 July 1964. Mr. Yuen-li Liang, Director of the Codification Division Chairman: Mr. Roberto Ago of the Office of Legal Affairs, represented the Secre- First Vice-Chairman: Mr. Herbert W. Briggs tary-General and acted as Secretary to the Commission. Second Vice-Chairman: Mr. Grigory I. Tunkin Rapporteur : Mr. Mustafa Kamil Yasseen C. AGENDA 5. At its 727th meeting, held on 20 May 1964, the Commission appointed a Drafting Committee composed 10. The Commission adopted an agenda for the as follows: sixteenth session consisting of the following items : Chairman: Mr. Herbert W. Briggs 1. Filling of casual vacancies in the Commission Members: Mr. Taslim O. Elias; Mr. Eduardo (article 11 of the Statute). Jimenez de Arechaga ; Mr. Antonio de Luna ; Mr. Paul 2. Prolongation of the session. Reuter ; Mr. Shabtai Rosenne ; Mr. Grigory I. Tunkin ; 3. Law of treaties. Sir Humphrey Waldock; Mr. Mustafa Kamil Yasseen. 4. Special missions. Mr. Milan BartoS took part in the Committee's work 5. Relations between States and inter-governmental as a Special Rapporteur on special missions when the organizations. articles relating to that topic were considered. In addi- 6. Organization of future sessions. tion, the Commission, at its 762nd meeting held on 7. Date and place of the seventeenth session. 9 July, appointed Mr. Obed Pessou as a member of the 8. Co-operation with other bodies. Committee. At its 727th meeting, the Commission also decided to request the Drafting Committee to assume 9. Other business. responsibility for the preparation of the Spanish texts 11. In the course of the session, the Commission of the draft articles, in addition to the English and held fifty-three public meetings and four private meet- French texts. ings. In addition, the Drafting Committee held ten meetings. The Commission considered all the items 6. The Secretary-General of the United Nations on its agenda. attended the 767th meeting, held on 16 July 1964. The Chairman of the Commission and the Secretary-General CHAPTER II made statements on that occasion. 7. The Chairman stressed that at the time the Law of Treaties United Nations was founded no one could have realized A. INTRODUCTION the extent and the urgency which the task of the International Law Commission, established under Ar- Summary of the Commission's proceedings ticle 13 of the Charter, would have in the future. 12. At its fourteenth and fifteenth sessions the Com- However, a great revolution was now taking place in mission provisionally adopted parts I (articles 1-29)* the world society under the auspices and with the encouragement of the United Nations, which had given 1 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1962, independence to a great number of States. That event vol. II, pp. 161-186. Report of the Commission to the General Assembly 175 and II (articles 30-54)2 of its draft articles on the law commence its re-examination of all the draft articles in of treaties, consisting respectively of twenty-nine ar- the light of the observations to be received from Gov- ticles on the conclusion, entry into force and registra- ernments. In the course of the present session the tion of treaties and twenty-five articles on the invalidity Commission has noted that apart from any matters of and termination of treaties. In adopting parts I and II substance that may be raised in the future, certain of the Commission decided, in accordance with articles 16 the articles already provisionally adopted require fur- and 21 of its Statute, to submit them, through the ther consideration in order to ensure their proper co- Secretary-General, to Governments for their observa- ordination with other articles. It has also noted that, tions. At its fifteenth session the Commission decided while the juxtaposition of some topics had been con- to continue its study of the law of treaties at its next venient for purposes of study, it may not necessarily be session, to give the topic priority, and to take up at that appropriate in the final arrangement of the draft ar- session the questions of the application, interpretation ticles, and that in consequence some readjustment of and effects of treaties. the material in the different parts and sections of the draft may be found to be desirable. At the same time, 13. At the present session of the Commission, the it recognized that special attention will have to be Special Rapporteur accordingly submitted a report given to ensuring as full consistency as is possible in (A/CN.4/167 and Add. 1-3) on the application, effects, the use of terminology in the final drafts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AG RECEIVED /Lf-Osi.>:F
    EC RECEIVED APR 1 6 2014 /lf- o SI.>:f­ EXBCtJTI'VEdm at OPTIIESECRET ARY-G.BNERAI, 14 April2014 ACTION M The Honourable Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General COPY D sf:, United Nations Headquarters c_cL c.... 2 United Nations Plaza £-s New York, New York 10017 United States of America AG The Reqm:st by Palestinian Officials to Join UN Agencies and Accede ro International Conventions Your Excellency: By way of introduction, the European Centre for Law and Justice ("ECLJ") is an international, Non-Governmental Organisation ("NGO"), dedicated, inter alia, to the promotion and protection of human rights and to the fu rtherance of the rule of law in international affairs. The ECLJ has held Special Consultative Status before the United Nations/ECOSOC since 200i. Recently, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas submitted a series of letters to various UN agencies as well as to officials of Switzerland and the Netherlands requesting that "Palestine" be admitted to the respective UN agency or that "Palestine" be permitted to accede to the respective convention or treaty2• By submitting such requests, President Abbas is attempting to obtain recognition of Palestinian statehood "through the back door" by circumventing the provisions of solemn treaties which the PA entered into in the past. Such a manoeuvre indicates that the Palestinians are prepared to violate the terms of agreements they have entered into when such terms become inconvenient or do not lead to the results the Palestinians otherwise desire. Such actions violate fo undational principles of international law, to wit, the principle of ·'good fa ith" 3 4 and the rule of ''pacta sunt servanda" regarding treaties , and cannot be permitted or tolerated.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Treaty Research
    ARTHUR W. DIAMOND LAW LIBRARY RESEARCH GUIDES Guide to Treaty Research Written by Simon Canick Maintained by Silke Sahl Last Updated April 2015 Contents [hide] 1 Introduction to Treaty Research 2 When the United States is a Party 2.1 Databases 2.2 Treaty Indexes 2.3 Pending / Recent Treaties 2.4 The Publication of Treaty Texts: Current 2.5 The Publication of Treaty Texts: Historic 3 When the United States May Not Be a Party 3.1 Databases ­ Multilateral Treaties 3.2 Treaty Indexes ­ Multilateral Treaties 3.3 Treaty Indexes ­ Bilateral / Multilateral Treaties 3.4 Treaty Collections 4 When You Know One of the Parties 4.1 Australia 4.2 Canada 4.3 European Union / European Communities 4.4 France 4.5 Germany 4.6 Great Britain 5 Subject­Specific Treaty Research 5.1 Arms Control 5.2 Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) 5.3 Commercial / Trade Agreements 5.4 Environmental Law 5.5 Human Rights 5.6 Intellectual Property 5.7 Tax Treaties 5.7.1 United States is a Party 5.7.2 United States May Not be a party 5.8 Terrorism 6 Treaty Citation 7 Other Research Guides Introduction to Treaty Research The Diamond Law Library is a great place to find the text of treaties. We have access to all of the resources described in this guide, and many others not mentioned. But even with the right tools, treaty research can be quite difficult and time consuming. This is especially true if you do not have a good understanding of treaties and how they are formed.
    [Show full text]
  • United States - Vatican Recognition: Background and Issues
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 29 Number 3 Volume 29, Summer 1984, Number 3 Article 2 United States - Vatican Recognition: Background and Issues Samuel W. Bettwy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES-VATICAN RECOGNITION: BACKGROUND AND ISSUESt SAMUEL W. BETTWY* "A lawyer without history or literature is a mechanic . .;[with] some knowledge of these .. .an architect."' In world affairs, the Roman Catholic Church and all its alter egos are known generically as "the Vatican." Its leader is the "Pope," its diplo- matic agent is called the "Holy See," and its independent territory is called "The State of Vatican City." The Vatican participates in interna- tional conferences as well as in bilateral and multilateral treaties with world nations. Nevertheless, the Church is not a state, nor does it claim to be one. On January 10, 1984, the United States became the 107th na- tion and the first superpower to establish reciprocal diplomatic relations with the Vatican.2 Although other attempts had been made, never before t Copyright Samuel W. Bettwy 1984. * Project Editor, American Society of International Law; Member, California and Arizona State Bars and the Bar of the District of Columbia; B.A. Economics, Pomona College; J.D., California Western School of Law; LL.M., Georgetown University Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of TREATIES to WHICH the MALDIVES IS PARTY to Updated: December 2020
    LIST OF TREATIES TO WHICH THE MALDIVES IS PARTY TO Updated: December 2020 Ratification(R)/ Accession (a)/ Date and place of Acceptance(A)/ No Treaty/ Convention/ Agreement Date of Signature Depositary Focal Point Internal Links adoption Approval (Ap)/ Participation(P)/ Succession(S) Note: An asterisk indicates that a treaty has either expired, been terminated, has been superseded by a subsequent agreement or has been amended. CONVENTIONS ESTABLISHING MULTILATERAL INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 1 Charter of the United Nations 26 June 1945, San 20-Sep-1965 US Govt (UN for Ministry of Foreign http://www.un.org/en/section Francisco some depositary Affairs s/un-charter/introductory- function) note/index.html 2 Amendment to Article 109 of the Charter of the United Nations, 20 Dec 1965, New 5-Sep-1968 UN Secretary Ministry of Foreign adopted by the UN General Assembly Resolution 2101 (XX) York General Affairs 3 Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) 26 June 1945, San 20-Sep-1965 US Govt (UN for http://www.icj- Francisco some depositary cij.org/documents/?p1=4&p2 function) =2 4 Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO) 22 July 1946, New 5-Nov-1965 (A) UN Secretary- Ministry of Health http://www.who.int/governan York General ce/eb/who_constitution_en.p df 5 Convention of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) 11 Oct 1947, 31-May-1967 (A) IMO Secretary- Ministry of Transport http://cil.nus.edu.sg/rp/il/pdf/ Washington General and Communication 1948%20Convention%20on %20the%20International%20 Maritime%20Organization- pdf.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • Treaties and Conventions
    Treaties and Conventions I. United States Treaties IV. Regional Treaty Collections II. Multilateral Treaty Collections V. Topical Treaty Collections III. National Treaty Collections VI. Guides and Glossaries I. UNITED STATES TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS Texts United States Congress - House, Senate, and Treaty Documents Search for text of treaty documents from the 99th Congress forward. Treaties and Other International Acts Series (TIAS) First official publication of new U.S. treaties and agreements - slip treaty. Lag time over 2 years for print. TIAS pamphlets for 1996-2003. Select year from left sidebar. Department of State's Freedom of Information Act Document Collections Provides an incomplete listing of agreements that entered into force after 1998. Organized by signing date, documents are unedited and subject to possible correction before their official publication in TIAS. Reporting International Agreements to Congress under Case Act (Text of Agreements) Contains text of any international agreement, other than a treaty, to which the United States is a party, required to be transmitted to Congress by the Secretary of State, within 60 days of the agreement's entry into force. U.S. Treaties Provided by Thomas service, Library of Congress. Coverage: 90th Congress to present (a few treaties from the 81st through the 89th.) Search by treaty number, word/phrase or topic (treaty type). Provides treaty number, date submitted and Senate Executive Report number. Use the citations to search in GPO Access for Senate Treaty Documents and Executive Reports. Senate Treaty Documents From the GPO. Coverage from 104th Congress to present. Search or browse for text of treaty documents. Treaty Documents contain text of negotiated and signed treaty, State Department report and Presidential transmittal letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological List of Treaties and Other Agreements
    Chronological List of Treaties and Other Agreements Archives Archives Nationales d’Outre-Mer, Aix-en-Provence, France. Archives privées – Général Louis Archinard (60 apc, 1880–1911) Archives privées – Alfred Durand (61 apc, 1891–1913) Archives privées – Cornut-Gentille (63 apc, 1884) Archives privées – Général Jean Baptiste Marchard (64 apc, 1899–1949) Archives privées – Pierre Savorgnan de Brazza (Missions) (16 pa, 1875–1905) Archives privées – Maréchal Joseph Gallieni (44 pa, 1880–1916) Gouvernement général de l’Afrique équatoriale française – Missions d’exploration et de délimitations de frontières (Sous-série 2D, 1883–1943) Gouvernement général de l’Afrique équatoriale française – Missions d’inspection des colonies (Sous-série 3D, 1901–1950) Ministère des Colonies – Série géographique (Dahomey, 1889–1918) Ministère des Colonies – Série géographique (Soudan français, 1875–1911) Ministère des Colonies – Série géographique (Niger, 1900–1938) Ministère des Colonies – Série géographique (Tchad, 1898–1918) Ministère des Colonies – Missions (1796–1932, 1944) Das Bundesarchiv, Berlin-Lichterfelde, Germany. Deutsches Reich: Kaiserreich (1871–1918) einschließlich Norddeutscher Bund (1867–1871) British Library, London, United Kingdom. Nineteenth century, Archives and Manuscripts, 1700 to 1919 National Archives, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom. Colonial Office (co): 148, 151, 464, 465, 473, 587, 588, 656, 659, 660, 700, 843, 879, 1039 Dominions Office (do): 119, 141 Foreign Office (fo): 2, 83, 84, 93, 94, 95, 96, 541, 881, 925, 959 School of Oriental and African Studies, London, United Kingdom. Conference of British Missionary Societies/International Missionary Council (imc/cbms) Restatement of African Law Project (ralp) pp ms 74 Mieke van der Linden - 9789004321199 Downloaded from Brill.com09/24/2021 02:56:36PM via free access <UN> 294 Chronological List of Treaties and Other Agreements Chronological List of Treaties and Other Agreements1 9 February 1839, Treaty of cession between France and King Denis of Gabon, De Clercq, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaties and Congressional-Executive Or Presidential Agreements: Interchangeable Instruments of National Policy: Ii
    TREATIES AND CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE OR PRESIDENTIAL AGREEMENTS: INTERCHANGEABLE INSTRUMENTS OF NATIONAL POLICY: II MYRES S. McDOUGALt AND ASHER LANSt VII. THE REQUIREMENTS OF A DEMOCRATIC FOREIGN POLIcy FOR THE WHOLE NATION The existence under our Constitution of the variety of interchange- able techniques, described in the previous Sections of this article,' for perfecting international agreements has obviously served the nation well in the past. It may in the future, 2 if the facts of variety and inter- changeability are fully recognized and acted upon by the public and by all branches of the Government, provide a system for the conduct of our foreign relations which is adequate both to cope with the im- peratives of survival and to secure our other national interests in the contemporary world-that is, a system whereby policy is quickly and easily formed by democratic means for the nation as a whole, and whereby the execution of policy is prompt and efficient, without being subjected to the adventitious whims and disintegrating attacks of obstructionist minority control. The flexibility and dispatch which such a system may require are available in the President's powers to make the initial decision as to how any particular agree- ment is to be perfected and to make and perform, on his own responsibility, all agreements needed to meet war and other emergen- cies. Conversely, ample check upon any arbitrary or unwise exercise of executive power, beyond what is imposed by public opinion and the President's unique responsibility to the voters of the whole nation, is insured by the fact that, without the aid of the Congress, the powers of the President, or even of the President and the Senate, to perform important international agreements are in the long run severely limited.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM January 30, 2015 To: to the Honorable Earl Blumenauer Attention: Kelsey L
    MEMORANDUM January 30, 2015 To: To the Honorable Earl Blumenauer Attention: Kelsey L. Aulakh and David Skillman From: Susan Chesser Information Research Specialist, 202-707-9547 Subject: Multilateral Executive Agreements 1985-2014 This memo responds to your request for a list of multilateral executive agreements to which the government of the United States has become a party over the past thirty years. Following is a list of these agreements compiled by comparing several sources. The U.S. Department of State publishes and posts electronically the annual Treaties in Force, which lists all treaties and other international agreements to which the United States is a party. Most recently, the Department published Treaties in Force as of January 1, 2013, plus a supplement that was published in 2014 listing all agreements that came into force during 2013. In addition, the Department posts Texts of International Agreements to which the US is a Party (TIAS). This site provides links to the text of each agreement from 1996 through 2014. As mentioned in our telephone conversation, I compared the titles of multilateral agreements listed in the above publications with the Treaties database in the Legislative Information System and identified the agreements that were sent to the U.S. Senate for approval, which is required of all treaties. The multilateral international agreements that were not sent to the Senate are, therefore, executive agreements. Following is the list of these international agreements since 1985, with entries copied from and arranged by topics designated in Treaties in Force. For complete identification of all parties to the agreements below, as well as identifying citations, please consult these sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Peace Treaties of Modern History
    Major Peace Treaties Of Modern History Trophic and homothermal Brant mistryst her pandects raggings ratably or nebulising summarily, is Enrique soundless? Argentine Jeffrey nidificate focally. Ambitious Andrew suffocating some bowpot after occlusal Sydney vestured reductively. The 5 Worst Treaties the United States Ever Signed Foreign. Major peace treaties of modern history 164-1967 by Fred L Israel unknown edition. The World Before the commission of Westphalia. Her work helped lay the foundation for modern codebreaking today. Significantly Articles 2 and 3 of another Treaty so important purposes not. In Mali after the signing of the Algiers peace agreement in 2015 women. Major Peace Treaties of Modern History Israel Fred L 97077541264 Books Amazonca. Major Peace Treaties of Modern History 164-2000 Israel Fred L Chill Emanuel Amazoncomau Books. Robert Gerwarth is thus of Modern History at UCD and Director. And supreme diplomat of the era it and five years to trip the peace treaties. Thus depended on modern history at this major peace treaty, against israeli teenagers are abundantly evident today respond to end of peaceful nuclear arsenals and. Why or sign in nationalist and thus giving hitler. Major Peace Treaties of Modern History 164-2000 Israel Fred L. Featuring 100 milestone documents of ancient history control the National Archives. By a peace conference that lasted over many year long treaty was disliked by every. Amazoncojp Major Peace Treaties of Modern History 164 1967. And middle-income countries not either able offer access modern contraceptives. This major british trade in history of studies, could be coupled with malabar and turkey acknowledges french and negotiate a popup modal, nonprofit membership would respond with further.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Series Cumulative Index
    UNITED NATIONS TREATY SERIES Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations CUMULATIVE INDEX No. 52 (Volumes 2751 to 2800) I. Treaties Nos. 48543 to 49255 (Registered) II. Treaty No. 1357 (Filed and Recorded) T r e a t y S e r i e s Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ C u m u l a t i v e I n d e x No. 52 (Volumes 2751 to 2800) I. Treaties Nos. 48543 to 49255 (Registered) II. Treaty No. 1357 (Filed and Recorded) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ UNITED NATIONS New York, 2016 Copyright © United Nations, 2016 All rights reserved. Printed by the United Nations Reproduction Section, New York. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, i.e., electronic, mechanical,photocopying,recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the United Nations. Copyright © Nations Unies, 2016 Tous droits réservés. Imprimé par la Section de la reproduction des Nations Unies, New York. La reproduction, l'archivage ou la transmission, même partiels, de la présente publication sous quelque forme quece soit par des moyens électroniques ou mécaniques,par photocopié,par enregistrement ou part tout moyen, sont subordonnés à l'autorisation préalable, donné par écrit, de l'Organisation des Nations Unies. Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ CUMULATIVE INDEX No. 52 Volumes 2751 to 2800 (May 2011 - January 2012) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General Introduction ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treaties in Force a List of Treaties and Other International Agreements Of
    United States Department of State 1 Treaties in Force A List of Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States in Force on January 1, 2000 Treaties2 in Force A List of Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States in Force on January 1, 2000 This publication lists treaties and other international agreements of the United States on record in the Department of State on January 1, 2000 which had not expired by their terms or which had not been denounced by the parties, replaced or superseded by other agreements, or otherwise defi- nitely terminated. Compiled by the Treaty Affairs Staff, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State. 3 Treaties in Force – January 1, 2000 4 Department of State Publication 9434 Office of the Legal Adviser Released June 2000 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 TREATIES IN FORCE i FOREWORD Treaties in Force is published annually by the Department of State for the purpose of providing information on treaties and other international agreements to which the United States has become a party and which are carried on the records of the Department of State as being in force as of January 1 of each year. The title Treaties in Force uses the term treaty in the generic sense as defined in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, that is, an international agreement ‘‘governed by international law, whether embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments and whatever its particular designation.’’ The term ‘‘treaty’’ in its restricted usage in the United States denotes international agreements made by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate in accordance with Article II, section 2 of the Constitution of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Treaties: a Bibliography*
    LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL Vol. 107:2 [2015-10] Indian Treaties: A Bibliography* Beth DiFelice** This bibliography describes sources for research into treaties between the U.S. govern- ment and Indian tribes, focusing on primary sources. The sources are preceded by an overview of the treaty process and the termination of the government’s power to enter into treaties with Indian nations. Overview of the Indian Treaty Process ..................................243 Congressional Termination of the Treaty Power ..........................243 How Many Indian Treaties? ...........................................244 Ratified Versus Nonratified Treaties ....................................245 Oral Traditions .....................................................245 Treaty Compilations .................................................246 Lists of Treaties .....................................................249 Treaty Proceedings ..................................................250 Congressional Documents ............................................250 Statements by Tribal Leaders ........................................250 National Archives .................................................251 Collections of Congressional Documents .............................251 Journal of the Executive Proceedings of the Senate .....................252 Congressional Committee Hearings ..................................252 Debates of Congress ...............................................252 Presidential Documents ............................................253 War
    [Show full text]