Alaska 2021 VACATIONS MAY — SEPTEMBER 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Possible Impacts of Prudhoe Bay Shut Down on Alaska Refinery Output
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH Oil & Gas, Mining & Special Projects Office 144 N. Binkley Street Soldotna, Alaska 99669 BUSINESS: (907) 714-2335 FAX: (907) 262-8616 [email protected] www.cookinletoilandgas.org JOHN J. WILLIAMS BOROUGH MAYOR To: Mayor John J. Williams Thru: Tim Navarre, Chief of Staff Date: August 8, 2006 From: Bill Popp, Oil, Gas & Mining Liaison Subject: Possible impacts of Prudhoe Bay shut down on Alaska refinery output This preliminary analysis is a follow up on the “first take” my office provided on August 7th regarding the possible impacts of the Prudhoe Bay oil field closure. In particular, the effects on Alaska’s total refinery output of finished petroleum products and the ripple effects that may be felt in the communities of the Kenai Peninsula Borough. As pointed out in the “first take,” there could be significant impacts on in-state production of motor diesel, home heating fuels, power generation fuels, jet fuels and gasoline. These impacts could lead to price spikes and shortages for these fuels unless the refiners are able to secure either adequate alternative supplies of refined products from outside of Alaska, or alternative supply contracts for North Slope crude oil originating from fields other than Prudhoe Bay. 1. Existing refineries, total through puts and outputs and total Alaska consumption Alaska currently has 6 refineries. Two refineries are based on the North Slope and only serve that region. Two refineries are based in Fairbanks. One is based in Valdez and one is based in Nikiski. The four refineries based in Fairbanks, Valdez and Nikiski serve the major population centers of Alaska and will be the focus of this analysis. -
CMI Cook Inlet Surface Current Mapping Final Report
OCS Study MMS 2006-032 Final Report CODAR in Alaska Principal Investigator: Dave Musgrave, PhD Associate Professor School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks P.O. Box 757220 Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220 (907) 474-7837 [email protected] CoAuthor: Hank Statscewich, MS School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks P.O. Box 757220 Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220 (907) 474-5720 [email protected] June 2006 Contact information e-mail: [email protected] phone: 907.474.1811 fax: 907.474.1188 postal: Coastal Marine Institute School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences P.O. Box 757220 University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220 ii Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of figures................................................................................................................................. iv Abstract........................................................................................................................................... v Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 2 Results............................................................................................................................................ -
Nos Cook Inlet Operational Forecast System: Model Development and Hindcast Skill Assessment
NOAA Technical Report NOS CS 40 NOS COOK INLET OPERATIONAL FORECAST SYSTEM: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND HINDCAST SKILL ASSESSMENT Silver Spring, Maryland September 2020 noaa National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Ocean Service Coast Survey Development Laboratory Office of Coast Survey National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce The Office of Coast Survey (OCS) is the Nation’s only official chartmaker. As the oldest United States scientific organization, dating from 1807, this office has a long history. Today it promotes safe navigation by managing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) nautical chart and oceanographic data collection and information programs. There are four components of OCS: The Coast Survey Development Laboratory develops new and efficient techniques to accomplish Coast Survey missions and to produce new and improved products and services for the maritime community and other coastal users. The Marine Chart Division acquires marine navigational data to construct and maintain nautical charts, Coast Pilots, and related marine products for the United States. The Hydrographic Surveys Division directs programs for ship and shore-based hydrographic survey units and conducts general hydrographic survey operations. The Navigational Services Division is the focal point for Coast Survey customer service activities, concentrating predominately on charting issues, fast-response hydrographic surveys, and Coast Pilot -
Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska
Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska Including the Kenai, Seldovia, Seward, Blying Sound, Cordova, and Middleton Island 1:250,000-scale quadrangles By Frederic H. Wilson and Chad P. Hults Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3110 View looking east down Harriman Fiord at Serpentine Glacier and Mount Gilbert. (photograph by M.L. Miller) 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Geographic, Physiographic, and Geologic Framework ..........................................................................1 Description of Map Units .............................................................................................................................3 Unconsolidated deposits ....................................................................................................................3 Surficial deposits ........................................................................................................................3 Rock Units West of the Border Ranges Fault System ....................................................................5 Bedded rocks ...............................................................................................................................5 -
On the Movement of Beluga Whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Old Dominion University Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons CCPO Publications Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography 12-2008 On the Movement of Beluga Whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska: Simulations of Tidal and Environmental Impacts Using a Hydrodynamic Inundation Model Tal Ezer Old Dominion University, [email protected] Roderick Hobbs Lie-Yauw Oey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ccpo_pubs Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Repository Citation Ezer, Tal; Hobbs, Roderick; and Oey, Lie-Yauw, "On the Movement of Beluga Whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska: Simulations of Tidal and Environmental Impacts Using a Hydrodynamic Inundation Model" (2008). CCPO Publications. 117. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ccpo_pubs/117 Original Publication Citation Ezer, T., Hobbs, R., & Oey, L.Y. (2008). On the movement of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska: Simulations of tidal and environmental impacts using a hydrodynamic inundation model. Oceanography, 21(4), 186-195. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2008.17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in CCPO Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The Oceanography Society. Send all correspondence to: [email protected] ofor Th e The to: [email protected] Oceanography approval Oceanography correspondence POall Box 1931, portionthe Send Society. -
Alaska M7.0 Earthquake Response
2018 M7.0 Anchorage, Alaska, Earthquake RESPONSE Date and Time: November 30, 2018, 8:29:29 am Location: N 61.323°, W 149.923° (7 miles north of Anchorage) Area of Effect: Strong to very strong shaking felt from northern Kenai Peninsula to Matanuska-Susitna Valley; light to moderate shaking felt throughout southcentral and interior Alaska. Initial earthquake followed 6 minutes later by M5.7 aftershock. Fatalities: 0 Damage: Power outages and gas leaks; damage to roads, railroads, and buildings; and closures of schools, businesses, and government offices throughout Anchorage bowl and Mat-Su Valley. Tsunami: Tsunami warnings were sent out within minutes of the earthquake. No tsunami waves Lateral spreading disrupted Vine Road near Wasilla. Many reported. failures of engineered materials occurred on or adjacent to water-saturated lowlands. (Photo credit: U.S. Geological Survey) Alaska Seismic Hazard Safety Commission Alaska Earthquake Center 2018 Cook Inlet Earthquake 1 Points to Ponder Proximity matters The Anchorage earthquake occurred 7 miles north of Anchorage and caused extensive damage, while the 2002 M7.9 Denali earthquake, which occurred about 170 miles north of Anchorage, caused no damage in the area. Anchorage population is approximately 325,00, Mat-Su 104,000 & Kenai Borough 50,000= 479,000 Entire state population is 710,000 Earthquake-resilient construction saves lives The population affected by the Anchorage earthquake generally reside in structures built in accordance with seismic building codes or using construction techniques that are resistant to earthquake shaking, and no lives were lost. Areas where codes were not enforced saw higher damage as a result Infrastructure is vulnerable to earthquake damage Construction codes for roads and embankments are not as successful as building codes for structures. -
Alaska Regions by Zip Code
Alaska Zip Codes Region Borough / Census Area Community Zipcode Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99501 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99502 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99503 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99504 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99505 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99507 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99508 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99509 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99510 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99511 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99512 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99513 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99514 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99515 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99516 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99517 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99518 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99519 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99520 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99521 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99522 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99523 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99524 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99540 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99599 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99695 Anchorage Anchorage Chugiak 99567 Anchorage Anchorage Eagle River 99577 Anchorage Anchorage Elmendorf AFB 99506 Anchorage Anchorage Fort Richardson 99505 Anchorage Anchorage Girdwood 99587 Anchorage Anchorage Girdwood 99693 Anchorage Anchorage Indian 99540 Northern Bethel Akiachak 99551 Northern Bethel Akiak 99552 Alaska Zip Codes Region Borough / Census Area Community Zipcode Northern Bethel Aniak 99557 Northern Bethel Atmautluak 99559 Northern Bethel Bethel 99559 Northern Bethel Bethel 99637 Northern Bethel Bethel 99679 Northern Bethel Bethel 99680 Northern -
Seward Alaska
2017 community services directory health, recreation & community organizations seward alaska Seward Prevention Coalition wellness | education | advocacy | support Table of Contents Emergency Services 1-3 Health Services 3-6 Community Resources 6-11 Community Service Organizations 11-12 Recreation 12-14 Education 14-16 Parent & Youth Resources 16-19 Fellowships 19-20 Tourism, Information & Media 21-22 Transportation & Housing 22-23 Alaska Resources 23-24 Facebook Listings 25 Emergency Services IN CASE OF EMERGENCY DIAL 911 LAW ENFORCEMENT Alaska State Troopers .............................................................. 224-3346 201 Third Avenue, Suite 202 Soldotna Dispatch ................................................................907-262-4453 www.dps.state.ak.us/ast Seward Police Department ...................................................... 224-3338 410 Adams Street / P.O. Box 167 www.cityofseward.us FIRE SERVICES Bear Creek Volunteer Fire & Emergency Medical Services 224-3345 13105 Seward Hwy, Mile 5.5 www.kpb.us/service-areas/bcfsa Moose Pass Volunteer Fire Co. 491-5776 Moose Pass, www.moosepassfire.com Seward Volunteer Fire Department 224-3445 316 Fourth Avenue, www.cityofseward.us MEDICAL SERVICES Providence Emergency Clinic 224-2846 417 First Avenue, P.O. Box 365 www.alaska.providence.org/locations/p/psmcc Seward Community Health Center ...... 224-2273 417 First Avenue, www.sewardhealthcenter.org Seward Volunteer Ambulance Corps ... 224-3987 200 D Street, P.O. Box 1136 www.sewardambulance.com 1 ANIMAL CONTROL Alaska SeaLife Center Rescue & Rehabilitation Hotline ......................................888-774-7325 Report stranded marine mammals and birds: www.alaskasealife.org/stranding_guidelines Pet Poison Helpline ...........................................................855-764-7661 www.petpoisonhelpline.com Seward Animal Shelter ............................................................ 224-7495 412 Sixth Avenue, P.O. Box 167 www.petfinder.com/shelters/AK10 Seward Animal Clinic ............................................................. -
The 1964 Prince William Sound Earthquake Subduction Zone Steven C
Adv. Geophys. ms. Last saved: 2/12/2003 6:lO:OO PM 1 Crustal Deformation in Southcentral Alaska: The 1964 Prince William Sound Earthquake Subduction Zone Steven C. Cohen Geodynamics Branch, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 2077 1 email: Steven.C.Cohen @ .nasa.gov; phone: 301-6 14-6466 Jeffrey T. Freymueller Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99775 Outline: 1. Introduction 2. Tectonic, Geologic, and Seismologic Setting 3. Observed Crustal Motion 3.1 Coseismic Crustal Motion 3.2 Preseismic and Interseismic (pre-1964) Crustal Motion 3.3 Postseismic and Interseismic (post-1964) Crustal Motion 4. Models of Southcentral Alaska Preseismic and Postseismic Crustal Deformation 5. Conclusions 6. References Adv. Geophys. ms. Last saved: a1 a2003 6:lO:OO PM 2 1. Introduction The M, = 9.2 Prince William Sound (PWS) that struck southcentral Alaska on March 28, 1964, is one of the important earthquakes in history. The importance of this Great Alaska Earthquake lies more in its scientific than societal impact. While the human losses in the PWS earthquake were certainly tragic, the sociological impact of the earthquake was less than that of is earthquakes that have struck heavily populated locales. By contrast Earth science, particularly tectonophysics, seismology, and geodesy, has benefited enormously from studies of this massive earthquake. The early 1960s was a particularly important time for both seismology and tectonophysics. Seismic instrumentation and analysis techniques were undergoing considerable modernization. For example, the VELA UNIFORM program for nuclear test detection resulted in the deployment of the World Wide Standard Seismographic Network in the late 1950s and early 1960s (Lay and Wallace, 1995). -
Tsunami–Tide Interactions a Cook Inlet Case Study
ARTICLE IN PRESS Continental Shelf Research 30 (2010) 633–642 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Continental Shelf Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/csr Tsunami–tide interactions: A Cook Inlet case study Zygmunt Kowalik a,Ã, Andrey Proshutinsky b a Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, AK 99775, USA b Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA article info abstract Article history: First, we investigated some aspects of tsunami–tide interactions based on idealized numerical Received 17 December 2008 experiments. Theoretically, by changing total ocean depth, tidal elevations influence the speed and Received in revised form magnitude of tsunami waves in shallow regions with dominating tidal signals. We tested this 22 September 2009 assumption by employing a simple 1-D model that describes propagation of tidal waves in a channel Accepted 1 October 2009 with gradually increasing depth and the interaction of the tidal waves with tsunamis generated at the Available online 9 October 2009 channel’s open boundary. Important conclusions from these studies are that computed elevations by Topical issue on ‘‘Tides in Marginal Seas’’ simulating the tsunami and the tide together differ significantly from linear superposing of the sea (in memory of Professor Alexei V. surface heights obtained when simulating the tide and the tsunami separately, and that maximum Nekrasov). The issue is published with tsunami–tide interaction depends on tidal amplitude and phase. The major cause of this tsunami–tide support of the North Pacific Marine interaction is tidally induced ocean depth that changes the conditions of tsunami propagation, Science Organization (PICES). -
Stocked Lakes on the Kenai Peninsula
Southcentral Region Northern Cook Inlet Region Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Recreational Fishing Series Stocked Lakes on the Kenai Peninsula Overview The Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s Division of Sport Fish has stocked lakes on the Kenai Peninsula since the early 1960s. Today, lakes are stocked to broaden fishing opportunities, and to improve popular existing fisheries. Most of the lakes are relatively small, and lack natural spawning areas. State of Alaska policy dictates that the fish stocked into area lakes are sterile so they are not able to successfully spawn and reproduce, therefore these lakes are scheduled for annual or alternate year stocking. The lakes are stocked in mid- to late summer. To find out which lakes have been stocked, go online to the Division of Sport Fish Southc e n t r a l-area Web pages at www.sf.adfg.state.ak.us and click on “Hatcheries and Stocking”, then select the “Fish Stocking Update” tab and follow the instructions. Maps to all stocked lakes can also be found online by clicking on ”Fishing Information” and then “Lake Fishing Info.” Or visit your local Division of Sport Fish office, or the Anchorage Sport Fish Information Center at 333 Raspberry Road, (907) 267-2218. The Lake Stocking Program Kenai Peninsula lakes offer good trout fishing. porting a salmon or trout population, having guaranteed Although there are hundreds of lakes on the Kenai public access, being landlocked so that stocked fish do Peninsula, only a few qualify for the stocking program. not escape, and being in an area that the angling public Many lakes are too shallow to support fish during the wants to fish. -
Cook Inlet Circulation Model Calculations Final Report to the U.S
OCS Study BOEM 2015-050 Cook Inlet Circulation Model Calculations Final Report to the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Contract No. M14AC00014 Seth L. Danielson1 [email protected] Katherine S. Hedstrom1 [email protected] 2 Enrique Curchitser [email protected] 1Institute of Marine Science 2Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences School of Fisheries and Ocean Science Rutgers University University of Alaska Fairbanks 71 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ 08901 905 N. Koyukuk Dr., Fairbanks AK, 99775 732-932-7889 (Office) 907 474-7834 (Office) 732- 932-8578 (Fax) 907 474 7204 (Fax) OCS Study BOEM 2015-050 Cook Inlet Circulation Model Calculations This collaboration between the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the University of Alaska Fairbanks and Rutgers University was funded by the the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region Anchorage AK 99503 under Contract No. M14AC00014 as part of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Environmental Studies Program 18 November 2016 Citation: Danielson, S. L., K. S. Hedstrom, E. Curchitser, 2016. Cook Inlet Model Calculations, Final Report to Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, M14AC00014, OCS Study BOEM 2015- 050, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 149 pp. Cover Image: NWGOA model sea surface salinity and Aqua Satellite 250 m pixel resolution false- color image of the northern Gulf of Alaska. Aqua image provided by NASA Rapid Response Land, Atmosphere Near real-time Capability for EOS (LANCE) system operated by the NASA/GSFC/Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) with funding provided by NASA/HQ.