DOCSLIB.ORG

Press Conference by the Chief Cabinet Secretary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Press Conference by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Top > Countermeasures for 2011 Tohoku - Pacific Ocean Earthquake Press Conference by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Saturday, March 26 at 04:18pm, 2011 [Provisional Translation] JAPANESE Opening Statement by Chief Cabinet Secretary Edano CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: I am sorry to have kept you all waiting. I have an announcement about the appointment of a Special Advisor to the Prime Minister. House of Representatives member Sumio Mabuchi was today named Special Advisor to the Prime Minister in charge of issues related to damage caused by the 2011 Tohoku ? Pacific Ocean Earthquake and the incident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant following a request by Special Advisor Manabu Terada to step down from the position. The Prime Minister accepted Mr. Terada's letter of resignation and Mr. Mabuchi received the letter of appointment from the Prime Minister moments ago. That is all from me for now. Q&As REPORTER: I am Kuribayashi from the Yomiuri Shimbun. Regarding the change in personnel, what is the reason behind the choice of Mr. Mabuchi? How did you decide that he was an appropriate person to take charge of the response to the nuclear incident and earthquake? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: Actually the Prime Minister wanted Special Advisor Goshi Hosono to take up these responsibilities as he is already working in the Headquarters set up by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) to respond to the situation at the power plant. However, given the enormous range of work that must be done, Special Advisor Hosono requested that the structure currently in place should be strengthened. The Prime Minister judged that, given the wealth of experience possessed by Mr. Mabuchi, he would be a good choice to work with Special Advisor Hosono on the accident at the power plant. Looking at the current situation and work that needs to be done, Mr. Mabuchi's experience as a former Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism is sure to be a valuable asset for the mid-term response to the earthquake, although this will depend on the situation at the power plant. I have heard that these are the reasons he was chosen for the job. REPORTER: So for the time being will Mr. Mabuchi be focusing on the incidents at the power plant then? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: Yes. I think this is what he will work on first. REPORTER: I am Sato of the Asahi Shimbun. First Yoshito Sengoku and now Sumio Mabuchi ? how do you respond to criticisms that the Government is only calling up the ministers who were censured? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: I of course understand that there must be many opinions about these selections but I believe that we must focus on strengthening our capability to respond to the earthquake and nuclear incident, and that this means calling up the most appropriate persons for each job. REPORTER: I am Koketsu of Jiji Press. During the last Cabinet reshuffle, the Prime Minister said that he had selected the best people possible for each position. Does that still hold true for this kind of situation? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: I believe that a similar question has been asked before. The immense disaster and nuclear incidents are really unlike anything we have seen before. We did not imagine such incidents during the last Cabinet reshuffle. At that time before these disasters had occurred, we formed the best possible group to tackle the new projects we wanted to work on. I think it is only natural that the best group to deal with the current issues and the issues we faced then would be different. REPORTER: I am Sato from Asahi Shimbun. My question concerns the radiation exposure incident at the power plant. TEPCO has announced that they confirmed large amounts of radiation around the plant before work began. Did the Government also know about the large concentration of radiation in the water around the plant from before? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: Nothing in the least was reported to me or the Prime Minister's Office about it. REPORTER: I am Murakami from the Sankei Shimbun. What do you think about the way TEPCO handled this, considering that they didn't report to you about it? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: In any event, in order to secure the safety of those working at the plant under such incredibly dangerous conditions and in order to reduce the effect and damage this incident causes, it is vital that the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) and other organizations in charge of the matter receive accurate and speedy reports of all available information. If information is not reported, the Government cannot give appropriate instructions and those working at the plant and the people of the nation will grow uneasy. The Government has been making requests to TEPCO that they be more strict about disclosing information and provide us with complete reports on everything that happens. REPORTER: I would like to ask the question again ? what is your opinion of the job TEPCO is doing, especially considering their predilection to hide information? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: I do not believe that it is the role of the Government to evaluate matters like that. I think that more than anything, in order for the Government to make an appropriate response to this incident, in order to alleviate the concerns of the public and avoid the sewing of distrust in TEPCO, we must make sure that all the information is released to the public. This incident has made me realize that I must give even firmer instructions on this point. REPORTER: I am Kuribayashi of the Yomiuri Shimbun. Radioactive materials at levels exceeding normal values were detected in vegetables produced in Ibaraki Prefecture and sold in Nagoya. Furthermore, more items are now being found to contain radioactive elements. With this problem growing in scope, do you think the Government should redouble its efforts to respond to this issue moving forward? What points do you want the people to be careful about and how do you expect them to behave? What messages does the Government intend to send to the people? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: I have received a number of reports from various places that some foods have been found to contain radioactive materials at levels exceeding normal values. This is extremely unfortunate. The standard levels for radiation currently upheld by the Government are very conservative and have been established in such a way to ensure absolute safety. As the standard levels are extremely precautious, even if foods that exceed these limits are consumed, there is no possibility that they will affect human health. However, once we detect an excess level of radioactivity in food items, as was the case for spinach and milk, we must act to prohibit the shipping of the items at a very early stage, so that they won't be consumed by people for an extended period of time. Therefore, even if some food items on the shelf right now contain radioactive materials exceeding the standard values, this will not affect human health. I want the people to thoroughly understand this point. I want the people to understand that we are taking precautionary actions such as the prohibition of shipping for the sake of safety, so that these items are not consumed for an extended period of time. REPORTER: I am Kurashiki of the Asahi Shimbun. You announced that Mr. Mabuchi has been appointed as Special Advisor in charge of the nuclear incident. With two weeks having now passed since the earthquake, does his appointment indicate that the issue will take longer to be resolved than initially expected? Please tell us the current outlook about the nuclear incident. CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: As the situation remains unpredictable, I think I should refrain from making statements based on assumptions. The current situation is that at least we are working to prevent the incident from getting any worse. Electricity to the plant has been restored and it is now possible to inject pure water into the reactors. My view is that we are making steps toward a fundamental improvement at the plant, but since it is too early to be optimistic, I think at the current stage I am not in a position to make a detailed prediction. Still, in order to stabilize the situation at the power plant, and in order to maintain that state for a long period of time, there is no doubt that a considerable number of steps, preparations, and operation will be required. That is why Mr. Mabuchi has been asked to become involved, in addition to the work already being done be Special Advisor Hosono. His involvement will create a structure to handle the enormous amount of work needed to conclude the issue. REPORTER: In relation to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, radioactive iodine 1,250 times higher than normal levels has been detected in seawater flowing through the sewer system south of the plant. I would thus like to ask once again what the current condition of the power plant is. Also, what sort of effect do you think the radiation will have on marine life? CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY EDANO: As for the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, as I said a moment ago, there is no question that we have prevented the situation from getting worse. This has come about thanks to work, such as the water- spraying operations, carried out under extremely difficult conditions by fire fighters and the SDF. That said, even though we have restored power to the plant, there are still instruments we need to use in order to understand the entire situation which have not yet been completely restored to their former functionality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Energy Policy and the National Deliberative Poll
    Nuclear Energy Policy and the National Deliberative Poll Yasunori Sone Keio University, Japan [email protected] “Public Policy and Public Consultation: Deliberative Democracy in Asia” May 20-21, 2016 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Summary The National Deliberative Poll on Energy and Environmental Policy was conducted in August 4-5, 2012. James Fishkin described it as “the first Deliberative Poll® (DP) anywhere in the world that was commissioned by a government to get input on a subject of national importance before a national decision.” This paper focuses on three aspects of Deliberative Polling in the policy making process. 1) Why the government adopted it as a tool of public consultation in the formal decision making process, 2) what were the poll results, and 3) how the government used it for their policy decisions. Interestingly, the poll shows us that the 285 randomly selected participants became more informed and changed their views on certain policy options. The public finally supported the zero nuclear option and concern for safety as a first criterion. It also shows that the public could not find any reliable authority to judge important key respects. It seems to be an “anomie” situation where there is no trust at all even in the nuclear specialists. After an ad hoc committee of specialists examined public consultation results such as from deliberative polls, public comments, town-meetings, and public opinion polls by media, Energy and Environment Council decided ‘the Innovative Strategy for Energy and the Environment’ that recommended the policy proposal “zero nuclear power by 2030s along with strong commitments to energy conservation and renewable energy.” The Cabinet finally made a decision according to the recommendation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Internet-Based Citizen Activism and Foreign Policy
    MODELING INTERNET-BASED CITIZEN ACTIVISM AND FOREIGN POLICY: The Islands Dispute between China and Japan TOMONOBU KUMAHIRA Primary Thesis Advisor: Professor Jordan Branch Department of Political Science Secondary Thesis Advisor: Professor Kerry Smith Department of History Honors Seminar Instructor: Professor Claudia Elliott The Watson Institute for International Studies SENIOR THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in International Relations BROWN UNIVERSITY PROVIDENCE, RI MAY 2015 © Copyright 2015 by Tomonobu Kumahira ABSTRACT How can citizens utilize the Internet to influence foreign policymaking? Optimists emphasize the Internet’s great potential to empower citizens, while pessimists underscore the persistent dominance of conventional actors in shaping diplomacy. These conceptual debates fail to build analytical models that theorize the mechanisms through which citizen activism impacts foreign policymaking in the Internet era. Focusing on the interactions between “old” institutions and new practices enabled by technology, I argue that Internet-based citizen activists are using multiple and evolving strategies to engage with the conventional media and policymakers. My Hybrid Model provides an analytical framework with which scholars can describe new forms of non-electoral representation by citizen movements, while challenging foreign policy decision making theories established before the social media. My model traces the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands dispute between China and Japan, in which nationalist campaigns online and offline have fueled a series of confrontations since 2005. Presenting practical implications for foreign policymakers and the conventional media to respond to the transformation, this Hybrid Model also helps citizens play a more active role in international relations. In conclusion, I explore the analogy between the Internet and past innovations in communication technologies to shed light on the future of the Internet and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan–China Relations
    22 WebMemo Published by The Heritage Foundation No. 3027 September 27, 2010 East China Sea Flare-Up: Learning the Wrong Lessons in Beijing Dean Cheng Japanese prosecutors have reportedly decided to greater concern, however, was the fact that Beijing release the captain of the Chinese fishing boat escalated both the rhetoric and its responses over whom they arrested after he apparently rammed the following two weeks, to the point of Chinese two Japanese coast guard vessels in the waters Premier Wen Jiabao publicly snubbing Japanese around the Senkakus. The decision, a Japanese dep- Prime Minister Naoto Kan last week at the United uty public prosecutor said, was made “taking into Nations and China suspending the sale of rare earth account the impact on our citizens and Japan– minerals (essential for the production of electronics) China relations, [so] our judgment was that it to Japanese customers. For Tokyo to decide to would have been excessive to prolong the investiga- release the Chinese captain in the face of such over- tion and his detention.”1 reaction only teaches Beijing that its policies worked. The Japanese government’s comments make it This is an extremely dangerous precedent not even clearer that this decision was made due to the only for Japan but for the larger East Asia region impact of the case on Sino–Japanese relations. Japa- and, ultimately, even for the United States. nese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshito Sengoku It was Beijing, not Tokyo, that decided that this stated explicitly, “It is a fact that there was the pos- relatively minor incident should escalate.
    [Show full text]
  • Regierungswechsel in Japan Sozialdemokratie Ohne Sozialdemokraten?
    PERSPEKTIVE | FES JAPAN Regierungswechsel in Japan Sozialdemokratie ohne Sozialdemokraten? SVEN SAALER Juni 2010 Am 2. Juni 2010 erklärte der japanische Premierminister Yukio Hatoyama nach nur achteinhalb Monaten Regierungszeit seinen Rücktritt. Zusammen mit Hatoyama trat der mächtige Generalsekretär der Demokratischen Partei Japans (DPJ), Ichirô Ozawa, zurück. Nach ihrem überwältigenden Wahlsieg im August 2009 hat die von der DPJ geführte Koalitionsregierung eine Reihe von Wahlversprechen erfüllt und Reformvorhaben umgesetzt. Hatoyama scheiterte aber letztlich am Unvermögen, eine selbst gesetzte Frist zur Verlegung eines US-Stützpunktes auf der südlichen Inselgruppe Okinawa einhalten zu können, was ihm die Missgunst der Wähler einbrachte und zum Austritt der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Japans (SDP) aus der Regierungskoalition führte. Hatoyamas Nachfolger ist Naoto Kan – schon seit Parteigründung einer der führenden Köpfe der DPJ. Kan ist bekannt als entschlossener Reformer und für seine Bürgernähe. Er stammt selbst aus der Bürgerbewegung und begann seine politische Karriere als Unterhausabgeordneter für den »Sozialdemokratischen Bund« (pÜ~â~á=jáåëÜì=oÉåÖ∑). Auch andere Mitglieder des neuen Kabinetts haben einen sozialdemokratischen Hintergrund, weshalb die sozialdemokratische Färbung des Kabinett Kan trotz des Austritts der SDP aus der Koalition nicht zu übersehen ist. Die Handlungsfähigkeit des neuen Kabinetts könnte jedoch von parteiinternen Konflikten beeinträchtigt werden. SVEN SAALER | REGIERUNGSWECHSEL IN JAPAN 1. Das Scheitern des Kabinetts Hatoyama Eine Reihe von Versprechen, deren Ankündigung den Wahlsieg der DPJ ermöglicht hatte, konnte daher nur Am 2. Juni 2010 erklärte der japanische Premierminister eingeschränkt oder gar nicht realisiert werden. Die Yukio Hatoyama nach nur acht Monaten Regierungszeit anfangs hohen Popularitätswerte des Kabinetts (über seinen Rücktritt. Zusammen mit Hatoyama trat der 70 Prozent) sanken daher rapide, auf zuletzt 17 einflussreiche Generalsekretär der Demokratischen Prozent.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rhetoric to Reality: Japanese Foreign-Policy Making Under The
    From Rhetoric to Reality Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan April 2012 The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis From Rhetoric to Reality Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan April 2012 Weston S. Konishi A publication of The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis Contents Introduction and Acknowledgments iii Executive Summary v Main Findings v From Rhetoric to Reality: Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan 1 Internal Challenges 4 Intra-party Divisions 4 The Complexities of Coalition Politics 7 Institutional Reforms: Toward Politician-Led Decision-Making 11 The DPJ’s Foreign Policy: Competing Visions 15 Realists 16 Pacifists 17 Centrists 17 Neo-Autonomists 18 Caveats 20 Prime Minister Hatoyama: An Agenda for Change 23 External Constraints on the Hatoyama Administration 27 The Kan Administration: Political Transition and Crisis Management 30 The Noda Administration: Shifting to the Center? 40 Findings and Implications 45 The Impact of Structural Obstacles on DPJ Foreign-Policy Making 45 Continuity versus Change 46 The DPJ: A Hawkish Party? 47 Bilateralism vs. Multilateralism 49 Competing Schools of Thought 51 Conclusion 54 APPENDIX A: Impact of Major Events on Cabinet Approval Ratings 56 FROM RHETORIC TO REALITY I APPENDIX B: The 2010 NDPG Process 59 APPENDIX C: Survey Data of DPJ Foreign Policy Viewpoints 62 APPENDIX D: Profiles of Key DPJ Politicians 63 APPENDIX E: Chronology of Major Events under DPJ Governments 79 Bibliography 86 About the Author 103 II FROM RHETORIC TO REALITY Introduction and Acknowledgments After more than fifty years of one-party dom- ister Kan Naoto, presided over Japan’s most chal- inance under the Liberal Democratic Par- lenging crisis since World War II—the March ty (LDP), Japan’s political landscape changed 11, 2011, Great East Japan Earthquake—before dramatically with the victory of the Democratic succumbing to his own political fate as a result Party of Japan (DPJ) in parliamentary elections of his inconsistent leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Calling September, 2010
    September 2010 A quarterly newsletter from the Embassy of Japan, India Mr. Katsuya Okada, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan (left), at a Joint Press Conference with Mr. S.M. Krishna, Minister of External Affairs of India, on August 21, 2010, in New Delhi. Photo Courtesy: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan CONTENTS • Prime Minister Naoto Kan Reshuffles His Cabinet P. 2 • Visit to India by Mr. Katsuya Okada, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan P. 3 • Diplomatic Bluebook 2010 Summary P. 5 • Important Embassy events held in the recent past P. 6 • Lectures by Prof. Toshihiko Kinoshita, Special Researcher, Industrial Mgmt. Institute, Waseda University P. 7 • The SAARC High School Student Exchange Program (June 23 – July 2, 2010) P. 8 • Earth Return of the Hayabusa P. 10 • Painting competition: Quest for Peace P. 11 • Learn Japanese online P. 11 • Anime Fest P. 12 JAPAN CALLING 1 PRIME MINISTER NAOTO KAN RESHUFFLES HIS CABINET Following his re-election as leader of the governing Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), Japanese Prime Minister, Mr. Naoto Kan, announced a new Cabinet on 17 September 2010. In the reshuffled Cabinet, Mr. Seiji Maehara has taken over as the new Foreign Minister of Japan. Mr Maehara, former Transport Minister, replaced Mr. Katsuya Okada, who has been appointed as the Secretary General of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). Foreign Minister, Mr. Seiji Maehara Photo courtesy: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan Prime Minister of Japan and his Cabinet LIST OF MINISTERS September 17, 2010 Prime Minister Naoto KAN Minister
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Asian and African Studies
    Journal of Asian and African Studies http://jas.sagepub.com Financial Crises, Politics and Financial Sector Restructuring: A Comparison between Japan and the United States Sara Konoe Journal of Asian and African Studies 2009; 44; 497 DOI: 10.1177/0021909609338901 The online version of this article can be found at: http://jas.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/44/5/497 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Journal of Asian and African Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://jas.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://jas.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Citations http://jas.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/44/5/497 Downloaded from http://jas.sagepub.com at European Univ Inst - Library on March 18, 2010 Journal of Asian and African Studies Financial Crises, Copyright © 2009 SAGE Publications www.sagepublications.com Politics and Financial (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC) J Sector Restructuring Vol 44(5): 497–515 DOI: 10.1177/0021909609338901 A A Comparison between A Japan and the United States S Sara Konoe Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Italy Abstract This article analyzes and compares the financial sector restructuring process after the financial crises in Japan and the United States. As these financial crises deepened, countries shifted their policies away from postponing financial sector restructuring toward more thorough reforms. The impacts of different political structures are examined through the Small-N Case Study method. Cases include: the bursting of the financial bubble in the 1990s in Japan and the Savings and Loan crisis in the 1980s in the USA, both of which are analyzed through a review of academic literature, journalistic writings, and statistical data from the World Wide Web.
    [Show full text]
  • Revival of Bureaucratic Maneuvering Under the Noda Cabinet : Who Pulled the Strings on Consumption Tax Hike in 2012?
    저작자표시-비영리-변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는 아래의 조건을 따르는 경우에 한하여 자유롭게 l 이 저작물을 복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연 및 방송할 수 있습니다. 다음과 같은 조건을 따라야 합니다: 저작자표시. 귀하는 원저작자를 표시하여야 합니다. 비영리. 귀하는 이 저작물을 영리 목적으로 이용할 수 없습니다. 변경금지. 귀하는 이 저작물을 개작, 변형 또는 가공할 수 없습니다. l 귀하는, 이 저작물의 재이용이나 배포의 경우, 이 저작물에 적용된 이용허락조건 을 명확하게 나타내어야 합니다. l 저작권자로부터 별도의 허가를 받으면 이러한 조건들은 적용되지 않습니다. 저작권법에 따른 이용자의 권리는 위의 내용에 의하여 영향을 받지 않습니다. 이것은 이용허락규약(Legal Code)을 이해하기 쉽게 요약한 것입니다. Disclaimer 국제학석사학위논문 Revival of Bureaucratic Maneuvering under the Noda Cabinet : Who Pulled the Strings on Consumption Tax Hike in 2012? 노다 내각 아래 되살아난 관료의 책략 : 2012년 소비세 인상의 배후는 누구였는가? 2016년 8월 서울대학교 국제대학원 국제학과 일본 지역학 이 보 배 Abstract Revival of Bureaucratic Maneuvering under the Noda Cabinet : Who Pulled the Strings on Consumption Tax Hike in 2012? 노다 내각 아래 되살아난 관료의 책략 : 2012년 소비세 인상의 배후는 누구였는가? Name: Bobae Lee Major and department: International Area Studies (Japan), Graduate School of International Studies The Graduate School Seoul National University In 2012, for the first time in fifteen years in Japan, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda won the parliamentary approval to raise the country’s sales tax by 10 percent by 2015. Despite the widespread tensions, Noda had stated that he would stake his political life on the success of the policy. Noda’s decision to raise the consumption tax breached the party’s own manifesto and eventually caused the Ozawa-led forty-nine member faction to leave the DPJ in protest.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports of the Committee on Freedom of Association
    INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE GB.308/3 308th Session Governing Body Geneva, June 2010 THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA Reports of the Committee on Freedom of Association 357th Report of the Committee on Freedom of Association Contents Paragraphs Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1–120 Case No. 2701 (Algeria): Report in which the Committee requests to be kept informed of developments Complaint against the Government of Algeria presented by the National Union of Vocational Training Workers (SNTFP) ......................................................... 121–142 The Committee‟s conclusions ....................................................................................... 133–141 The Committee‟s recommendation ......................................................................................... 142 Case No. 2702 (Argentina): Interim report Complaint against the Government of Argentina presented by the Congress of Argentine Workers (CTA) ........................................................................ 143–164 The Committee‟s conclusions ....................................................................................... 160–163 The Committee‟s recommendations ........................................................................................ 164 Case No. 2698 (Australia): Report in which the Committee requests to be kept informed of developments Complaint against the Government of Australia presented by the Communications,
    [Show full text]
  • East Asian Community” in Vain
    ISS Discussion Paper Series F-172 Building an “East Asian Community” in vain: Japan's Power Shift and Regionalism in the New Millennium Hiroyuki Hoshiro1 1 Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo ([email protected]) 1 Abstract In August 2009, as a result of the “historical” general election of Japan, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) gained legislative majority and took over the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) government, which had been in power for more than 16 years. One of the most noteworthy foreign policies launched by the new Japanese government was aimed at building an “East Asian Community;” however, little progress was observed with regards to the promotion of economic regionalism, during the DPJ era (2009-2012). Why was this policy not as actively pursued by the DPJ cabinet as originally intended? This is puzzling, given the fact that economic regionalism was one of the Prime Minister’s most favored policies; and that there was an absence of significant objections from opposition parties with regards to this policy. This paper addresses this question by elucidating factors that promoted or impeded the building of an “East Asian Community” from the perspective of Japanese domestic politics. In particular, this paper sheds light on the preferences of the existing societal organizations of land, capital, and labor, on the one hand, and their relationships with the ruling government, on the other. This paper shows that the previous DPJ government, having been an advocate of economic regionalism in East Asia, has, in fact, experienced strong dissent among its supporters.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Earthquake Hit, the Governor of Iwate Prefecture Requested the Dispatch of Ground Self-Defense Force (SDF) Troops to Assist in Disaster Relief
    & Gijs Berends (eds) Berends & Gijs Al-Badri Dominic AFTER THE How has Japan responded to the March 2011 disaster? What changes have been made in key domestic policy areas? GREAT EaST JAPAN The triple disaster that struck Japan in March 2011 began with the most powerful earthquake known to have hit Japan and led to tsunami reaching 40 meters in height that GREAFTER THE EaRTHQUAKE devastated a wide area and caused thousands of deaths. The ensuing accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power POLITICAL AND POLICY CHANGE plant was Japan’s worst and only second to Chernobyl in its IN POST-FUKUSHIMA JAPAN severity. But has this triple disaster also changed Japan? Has it led to a transformation of the country, a shift in how Japan functions? This book, with fresh perspectives on extra- Edited by ordinary events written by diplomats and policy experts at European embassies to Japan, explores subsequent shifts A Dominic Al-Badri and Gijs Berends in Japanese politics and policy-making to see if profound T changes have occurred or if instead these changes have been Ea limited. The book addresses those policy areas most likely to be affected by the tragedy – politics, economics, energy, J ST climate, agriculture and food safety – describes how the sector has been affected and considers what the implications A are for the future. P A N N Ea RTHQU A KE www.niaspress.dk Al-Badri-Berends_cover.indd 1 12/02/2013 14:12 AFTER THE GREAT EaST JAPAN EaRTHQUAKE Al-Badri-Berends_book.indd 1 12/02/2013 14:29 ASIA INSIGHTS A series aimed at increasing an understanding of contemporary Asia among policy-makers, NGOs, businesses, journalists and other members of the general public as well as scholars and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Policy Change in Japan After Fukushima: Beliefs, Interests, and Positions
    Nuclear policy change in Japan after Fukushima: Beliefs, Interests, and Positions Rie Watanabe (Dr. rer. pol) University of the Niigata Prefecture In Salzburg Outline • Background • Empirical Research Questions • Theoretical Background • Hypotheses for this study • Development of Nuclear Policy Subsystem in Japan – Positions of main actors before the Fukushima accident • Change/No change of positions of main actors after Fukushima • Conclusions: Factors explaining large-policy change after Fukushima Nuclear policy changes in Japan after Fukushima According to theories of policy change, a crisis can trigger non-incremental or major policy changes (e.g. Baumgartner and Jones 1993, Kingdon 1995, Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith 1993, 1999, Birkland 2005, Sabatier and Weible 2007). Several major changes indeed took place in Japan’s nuclear policy after Fukushima. E.g. • Setting up lifetime of nuclear power plants at 40 years (maximum 60 years), • Establishing Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) under the Ministry of the Environment, • Undertaking the Deliberative Polling in the summer 2012, • Adopting innovative energy and environment strategy, that aimed the phase-out of nuclear power plants in the 2030s (September 14, 2012) Theoretical Background: Crisis and Policy Change • Policy change takes place through the interplay of actors in a specific policy domain (policy subsystem) (e.g. Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith 1993, 1999, Baumgartner and Jones 1993, Birkland 2005). • Actors who share beliefs or interests tend to form groups or coalitions in order to translate their beliefs into, or realize their interests through, public policy (e.g. Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith 1993, Baumgartner and Jones 1993, Hall 1993). • Any move by a disadvantaged group attempting to translate its beliefs or interests into public policy and to induce policy change is usually resisted by the advantaged who usually afford larger human and material resources.
    [Show full text]