Family-Group Names in the Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)—A Supplement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Family-Group Names in the Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)—A Supplement Zootaxa 3616 (4): 325–344 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3616.4.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:351A064C-8CEC-4A85-A466-0E2F139856BB Family-group names in the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)—a supplement D.J. WILLIAMS Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. E-mail [email protected] Abstract Williams (1969) published a list of the family-group names in the Coccoidea (scale insects) recognised at that time. The present paper supplements this earlier list and includes all nominal genera that have had family-group names based on them, including those in the earlier paper, in case it is not readily available to some workers. Nominal genera and their family-group names are listed alphabetically in catalogue form. There are now 49 families generally recognised in the scale insects, of which 16 are only known as fossils. Furthermore, 180 nominal genera have now had family-group names based on them. As stated in the 1969 list, all categories in the family group are deemed to be of co-ordinate status in no- menclature. Key words: archaeococcoids, neococcoids, ranks, genera Introduction The following list of family-group names in the superfamily Coccoidea or scale insects is a supplement to the earlier list in Williams (1969). When the first list was compiled, most scale insect workers recognised fewer than 20 extant families. This figure has now risen to 33 with the newest addition Rhizoecidae as shown in the database of scale insects (Ben-Dov et al. 2012). Furthermore, the total excludes 16 families only known from fossils that have been described in recent years, so the total of all families is now 49. Moreover, a little over 100 of the nominal genera listed in Williams (1969) had family-group names based on them; there are now 180 in the present list. There are probably far too many families for a group the size of the scale insects. In recent years, there have been many developments in the study of scale insects. It was shown by Koteja (1974, a, b) from studies based on the mouthparts, that many of the subfamilies and tribes established in the family Margarodidae (sensu Morrison, 1928), should be raised to distinct family level. Some later phylogenetic studies based on morphological and molecular data (Hodgson, 2002; Cook et al. 2002; Gullan & Cook, 2007; Hodgson & Foldi, 2005, 2006) have shown that Koteja’s action was justified. A new extinct family Naibiidae Shcherbakov and the subfamily Naibiinae based on the nominal genus Naibia Shcherbakov, described by Shcherbakov (2007) and purporting to be a scale insect stem group, is so far excluded because the position and relationships of the family to scale insects is uncertain (Gullan & Cook, 2007). At present, the scale insects are divided into two major informal groups, the archaeococcoids and the neococcoids. These names are not formally recognised using the “The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature” but they were derived from the names Archaeococcoidea and Neococcoidea of Bodenheimer (1953). Borchsenius (1949) preferred the name Paleococcoidea for the archaeococcoids. Unfortunately, these names were not based on nominal genera. The archaeococcoids comprise the Ortheziidae, all the families elevated from the lower ranks in Morrison (1928), and some other families, mostly with a plesiomorphic sex chromosome system XX-XO (Hughes-Schrader, 1948; Yokogawa & Yahara, 2009). Based on adult male morphology, the archaeococcoid group includes many of the families only known as fossils. The neococcoids contain all the other families, mostly with a sex chromosome system based on paternal genome elimination (PGE) as discussed by Accepted by C.J. Hodgson: 23 Jan. 2013; published: 21 Feb. 2013 325 Normark (2003), Yokogawa and Yahara (2009) and Ross et al. (2010), plus a few extinct families based on morphological characters. Some workers, mostly in eastern Europe (e.g. Koteja, 1974a; Danzig, 1980) favour a classification accepting the scale insects as belonging to a suborder, the Coccinea, with the two superfamilies Orthezioidea and Coccoidea, names based on nominal genera and replacing the names archaeococcoids and neococcoids. It is not clear if workers in the other hemipteran groups, currently accepted as the superfamilies Psylloidea, Aphididoidea and Aleyrodoidea in the present suborder Sternorrhyncha, would agree with this elevation in rank and accept their study groups as suborders. Family-group ranks below those of family and subfamily are not always popular or necessary. Concepts of generic groupings are changing rapidly with new phylogenetic studies. For example, based on morphological and molecular studies by Hardy et al. (2008), it was shown that there are two subfamilies only in the family Pseudococcidae. All family-group names that had been erected in the two subfamilies of Pseudococcidae were listed by Williams & Gullan (2010). More recently, Ben-Dov (2011) has listed all the genera and species in most of the extant families of the archaeococcoids belonging to the former family Margarodidae of Morrison (1928). Recent printed catalogues of the family Diaspididae by Ben-Dov (2003) and Miller & Gimpel (2009) have listed genera and species belonging to the subfamilies Aspidiotinae, Comstockiellinae, Diaspidinae, Leucaspidinae, Odonaspidinae and Ullucoccinae without using lower ranks. Published catalogues on all the other families have used the family rank only. A recent work on the family Diaspididae (Miller & Davidson, 2005) has dealt with genera and species in strict alphabetical order with keys but without recourse to any ranks below that of family. Other taxonomic works on families in some zoogeographical regions have been published in recent years with the same approach without using ranks below that of family, and all appear to be readily usable. Some of the family- group names have already been treated as synonyms and, detailed work based on morphological and molecular studies, may show new relationships (e.g. Morse & Normark (2006) and Andersen et al. (2010)) for the family Diaspididae) so that some of the present ranks may become obsolete. The following account lists all the nominal genera that have family-group names based on them including names listed in Williams (1969). For the latter, the page reference in Williams (1969) is provided. Names of new ranks, published after the first list, are preceded by an asterisk [*]. The family name, presently accepted in the latest published catalogues and in ScaleNet (Ben-Dov et al. 2012), is added after each nominal genus together with the main groups (either archaeococcoids or neococcoids) following the phylogeny given in Gullan & Cook (2007). I have searched most of the pertinent literature published after 1969 to the end of 2012 but there may be some omissions and there is always the possibility that the list may not be complete. Some major works, published mainly in Chinese, have more precise dates of publication than is generally understood by non-Chinese workers. For instance, the work by Tang (1991) was published in April 1991, that of Tang (1992) on 31 May 1992, and the work by Tang & Hao (1995) in June 1995 (San-an Wu, personal communication). List of nominal genera and family-group names Acanthococcus Signoret, 1875. Eriococcidae (neococcoids). Williams, 1969: 318. After a proposal by Miller & Williams (1976), the family-group name Eriococcini Cockerell, 1889, was given precedence over Acanthococcidae Signoret, 1875, by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1982) (Opinion, 1203). The family-group name based on the nominal genus Acanthococcus is still available. Aclerda, Signoret, 1874. Aclerdidae (neococcoids). Williams, 1969: 318. Albicoccus Koteja, 2004. Albicoccidae (archaeococcoids). *Albicoccidae Koteja, 2004: 111. This family was described from a fossil adult male in Burmese amber. 326 · Zootaxa 3616 (4) © 2013 Magnolia Press WILLIAMS Allomyrmococcus Takahashi, 1941. Pseudococcidae (neococcoids). *Allomyrmococcini Williams, 1978: 14. *Allomyrmococcina Williams, Tang, 1992: 77. Ancepaspis Ferris, 1920. Diaspididae (neococcoids). Williams, 1969: 319. Andaspis MacGillivray 1921. Diaspididae (neococcoids). Williams, 1969: 319. Antakaspis Mamet, 1959. Diaspididae (neococcoids). Williams, 1969: 319. Anomalococcus Green, 1902. Lecanodiaspididae (neococcoids). *Anomalococcina Tang & Hao, 1995: 211, 244, 245, 623. Tang & Hao placed this subtribe in the tribe Lecanodiaspidini. Antonina Signoret, 1875. Pseudococcidae (neococcoids). Williams 1969: 319. *Antoninina Borchenius, Tang, 1992: 18. Tang placed this subtribe in the subfamily Sphaerococcinae, now Pseudococcinae. Antoninoides Ferris, 1953. Pseudococcidae (neococcoids). *Antonoidina Han, Hao, Tang & Tang, 1992: 31 (nomen nudum and misspelling). This subtribal name was placed in the tribe Sphaerococcini, subfamily Sphaerococcinae. Although the authors stated that the subtribe would be included in a key, no such key has been found so the name is without a description (San-an Wu, personal communication). Aonidia Targioni Tozzetti, 1868. Diaspididae (neococcoids). Williams, 1969: 319. Apiomorpha Rübsaamen, 1894. Eriococcidae (neococcoids). Williams, 1969: 319. Araucaricoccus Brimblecombe 1960: 183. Steingeliidae (archaeococcoids). *Araucaricoccini Tang & Hao, 1995: 74, 606. This was erected as a tribe of the subfamily
Recommended publications
  • Zootaxa,Phylogeny and Higher Classification of the Scale Insects
    Zootaxa 1668: 413–425 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Phylogeny and higher classification of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)* P.J. GULLAN1 AND L.G. COOK2 1Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .413 Introduction . .413 A review of archaeococcoid classification and relationships . 416 A review of neococcoid classification and relationships . .420 Future directions . .421 Acknowledgements . .422 References . .422 Abstract The superfamily Coccoidea contains nearly 8000 species of plant-feeding hemipterans comprising up to 32 families divided traditionally into two informal groups, the archaeococcoids and the neococcoids. The neococcoids form a mono- phyletic group supported by both morphological and genetic data. In contrast, the monophyly of the archaeococcoids is uncertain and the higher level ranks within it have been controversial, particularly since the late Professor Jan Koteja introduced his multi-family classification for scale insects in 1974. Recent phylogenetic studies using molecular and morphological data support the recognition of up to 15 extant families of archaeococcoids, including 11 families for the former Margarodidae sensu lato, vindicating Koteja’s views. Archaeococcoids are represented better in the fossil record than neococcoids, and have an adequate record through the Tertiary and Cretaceous but almost no putative coccoid fos- sils are known from earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Old World Climbing Fern (Lygodium Microphyllum (Cav.) R
    THE EFFECT OF OLD WORLD CLIMBING FERN (LYGODIUM MICROPHYLLUM (CAV.) R. BROWN) ON SOUTH FLORIDA CYPRESS (TAXODIUM DISTICHUM (L.) RICH.) SWAMP PLANT AND INSECT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE By DANIEL WAYNE CLARK A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2002 Copyright 2002 by Daniel Wayne Clark This thesis is respectfully dedicated to my grandparents, Richard and Elizabeth McKenna and Charles and Agnes Clark for their years of selfless love and unwavering support. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. Randall Stocker, who chaired my graduate supervisory committee, directed my research program, and provided me with personal guidance and friendship throughout my graduate program. He was truly a mentor and continues to impress me with his ability to adapt publicly to any audience and end up being the focal individual for relevant information, professionalism and leadership. These people skills combined with his academic expertise continue to make him sought after at local, national and international levels professionally. Dr. Alison Fox served as an Agronomy Department representative to my supervisory committee. She provided much needed technical support, critical review and focus during the scholastic, research and writing phases of my project. I also thank her for her personal friendship and professional guidance. She selflessly made time for unscheduled meetings and was always available for consultation. Her energetic and personable nature facilitated numerous stimulating discussions and empowered me to increase my own scientific and critical thought. Dr. Katie Sieving, an external representative of my committee from the Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Department, imparted to me the sheer fun of being academic.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Ology Vol 58, No. 1
    FDACS-P-00124 April - June 2020 Volume 59, Number 2 TRI- OLOGY A PUBLICATION FROM THE DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY, BUREAU OF ENTOMOLOGY, NEMATOLOGY, AND PLANT PATHOLOGY Division Director, Trevor R. Smith, Ph.D. BOTANY ENTOMOLOGY NEMATOLOGY PLANT PATHOLOGY Providing information about plants: Identifying arthropods, taxonomic Providing certification programs and Offering plant disease diagnoses native, exotic, protected and weedy research and curating collections diagnoses of plant problems and information Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services • Division of Plant Industry 1 Phaenomerus foveipennis (Morimoto), a conoderine weevil. Photo by Kyle E. Schnepp, DPI ABOUT TRI-OLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services- Division of Plant Industry’s (FDACS-DPI) Bureau of Entomology, HIGHLIGHTS 03 Nematology, and Plant Pathology (ENPP), including the Botany Noteworthy examples from the diagnostic groups Section, produces TRI-OLOGY four times a year, covering three throughout the ENPP Bureau. months of activity in each issue. The report includes detection activities from nursery plant inspections, routine and emergency program surveys, and BOTANY 04 requests for identification of plants and pests from the public. Samples are also occasionally sent from other states or countries Quarterly activity reports from Botany and selected plant identification samples. for identification or diagnosis. HOW TO CITE TRI-OLOGY Section Editor. Year. Section Name. P.J. Anderson and G.S. Hodges ENTOMOLOGY 07 (Editors). TRI-OLOGY Volume (number): page. [Date you accessed site.] Quarterly activity reports from Entomology and samples reported as new introductions or interceptions. For example: S.E. Halbert. 2015. Entomology Section. P.J. Anderson and G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Dimorphism in the Wing Shape and Size of the Carob Moth, Ectomyelois Ceratoniae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
    J o u r n a l o f E n t o m o l o g i c a l S o c i e t y o f I r a n 61 2007, 26(2), 61-73 Sexual dimorphism in the wing shape and size of the carob moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) F. Mozaffarian1, A. Sarafrazi1 and G. Nouri Ganbalani2 1. Insect Taxonomy Research Department, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, 19395-1454, Iran, [email protected], [email protected], 2. Faculty of Agriculture, Moghadas-e-Ardebili University, Ardebil, Iran. Abstract The carob moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Zeller), belongs to the family Pyralidae and the subfamily Phycitinae. In spite of some features of sexual dimorphism in size and shape in the order Lepidoptera and the mentioned family, it has not been recorded in this species. In the current study, sexual dimorphism in the wing shape and size of carob moth on four hosts (pomegranate, fig, pistachio and walnut) were detected using landmark- based geometric morphometric and analysis of partial warp scores and centroid sizes. The analysis showed significant wing shape differences (fore wing: P = 1.315E-011, hind wing: P = 1.168E-007) which was the same on all tested hosts. Geometric changes in the fore and hind wing of both sexes were illustrated. Analyses of size showed wings of the females are bigger than those of the males (fore wing: F = 23.19, P = 0.000; hind wing: F = 16.73, P = 0.000) on tested hosts and in spite of allometric growth in test specimens, significant shape differences are still remain in constant size.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Pupillarial Scale Insect (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Eriococcidae) from Angophora in Coastal New South Wales, Australia
    Zootaxa 4117 (1): 085–100 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4117.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C240849-6842-44B0-AD9F-DFB25038B675 A new pupillarial scale insect (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Eriococcidae) from Angophora in coastal New South Wales, Australia PENNY J. GULLAN1,3 & DOUGLAS J. WILLIAMS2 1Division of Evolution, Ecology & Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia 2The Natural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences (Entomology), London SW7 5BD, UK 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new scale insect, Aolacoccus angophorae gen. nov. and sp. nov. (Eriococcidae), is described from the bark of Ango- phora (Myrtaceae) growing in the Sydney area of New South Wales, Australia. These insects do not produce honeydew, are not ant-tended and probably feed on cortical parenchyma. The adult female is pupillarial as it is retained within the cuticle of the penultimate (second) instar. The crawlers (mobile first-instar nymphs) emerge via a flap or operculum at the posterior end of the abdomen of the second-instar exuviae. The adult and second-instar females, second-instar male and first-instar nymph, as well as salient features of the apterous adult male, are described and illustrated. The adult female of this new taxon has some morphological similarities to females of the non-pupillarial palm scale Phoenicococcus marlatti Cockerell (Phoenicococcidae), the pupillarial palm scales (Halimococcidae) and some pupillarial genera of armoured scales (Diaspididae), but is related to other Australian Myrtaceae-feeding eriococcids.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse New Scale Insects (Hemiptera, Coccoidea) in Amber
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3823, 80 pp. January 16, 2015 Diverse new scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) in amber from the Cretaceous and Eocene with a phylogenetic framework for fossil Coccoidea ISABELLE M. VEA1'2 AND DAVID A. GRIMALDI2 ABSTRACT Coccoids are abundant and diverse in most amber deposits around the world, but largely as macropterous males. Based on a study of male coccoids in Lebanese amber (Early Cretaceous), Burmese amber (Albian-Cenomanian), Cambay amber from western India (Early Eocene), and Baltic amber (mid-Eocene), 16 new species, 11 new genera, and three new families are added to the coccoid fossil record: Apticoccidae, n. fam., based on Apticoccus Koteja and Azar, and includ¬ ing two new species A.fortis, n. sp., and A. longitenuis, n. sp.; the monotypic family Hodgsonicoc- cidae, n. fam., including Hodgsonicoccus patefactus, n. gen., n. sp.; Kozariidae, n. fam., including Kozarius achronus, n. gen., n. sp., and K. perpetuus, n. sp.; the first occurrence of a Coccidae in Burmese amber, Rosahendersonia prisca, n. gen., n. sp.; the first fossil record of a Margarodidae sensu stricto, Heteromargarodes hukamsinghi, n. sp.; a peculiar Diaspididae in Indian amber, Nor- markicoccus cambayae, n. gen., n. sp.; a Pityococcidae from Baltic amber, Pityococcus monilifor- malis, n. sp., two Pseudococcidae in Lebanese and Burmese ambers, Williamsicoccus megalops, n. gen., n. sp., and Gilderius eukrinops, n. gen., n. sp.; an Early Cretaceous Weitschatidae, Pseudo- weitschatus audebertis, n. gen., n. sp.; four genera considered incertae sedis, Alacrena peculiaris, n. gen., n. sp., Magnilens glaesaria, n. gen., n. sp., and Pedicellicoccus marginatus, n. gen., n. sp., and Xiphos vani, n.
    [Show full text]
  • American Museum Novitates
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3823, 80 pp. January 16, 2015 Diverse new scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) in amber from the Cretaceous and Eocene with a phylogenetic framework for fossil Coccoidea ISABELLE M. VEA1, 2 AND DAVID A. GRIMALDI2 ABSTRACT Coccoids are abundant and diverse in most amber deposits around the world, but largely as macropterous males. Based on a study of male coccoids in Lebanese amber (Early Cretaceous), Burmese amber (Albian-Cenomanian), Cambay amber from western India (Early Eocene), and Baltic amber (mid-Eocene), 16 new species, 11 new genera, and three new families are added to the coccoid fossil record: Apticoccidae, n. fam., based on Apticoccus Koteja and Azar, and includ- ing two new species A. fortis, n. sp., and A. longitenuis, n. sp.; the monotypic family Hodgsonicoc- cidae, n. fam., including Hodgsonicoccus patefactus, n. gen., n. sp.; Kozariidae, n. fam., including Kozarius achronus, n. gen., n. sp., and K. perpetuus, n. sp.; the irst occurrence of a Coccidae in Burmese amber, Rosahendersonia prisca, n. gen., n. sp.; the irst fossil record of a Margarodidae sensu stricto, Heteromargarodes hukamsinghi, n. sp.; a peculiar Diaspididae in Indian amber, Nor- markicoccus cambayae, n. gen., n. sp.; a Pityococcidae from Baltic amber, Pityococcus monilifor- malis, n. sp., two Pseudococcidae in Lebanese and Burmese ambers, Williamsicoccus megalops, n. gen., n. sp., and Gilderius eukrinops, n. gen., n. sp.; an Early Cretaceous Weitschatidae, Pseudo- weitschatus audebertis, n. gen., n. sp.; four genera considered incertae sedis, Alacrena peculiaris, n. gen., n. sp., Magnilens glaesaria, n. gen., n. sp., and Pedicellicoccus marginatus, n. gen., n. sp., and Xiphos vani, n.
    [Show full text]
  • International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods 424 Poster Presentations ______
    POSTER PRESENTATIONS ______________________________________________________________ Poster Presentations 423 IMPROVEMENT OF RELEASE METHOD FOR APHIDOLETES APHIDIMYZA (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE) BASED ON ECOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL STUDIES Junichiro Abe and Junichi Yukawa Entomological Laboratory, Kyushu University, Japan ABSTRACT. In many countries, Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani) has been used effectively as a biological control agent against aphids, particularly in greenhouses. In Japan, A. aphidimyza was reg- istered as a biological control agent in April 1999, and mass-produced cocoons have been imported from The Netherlands and United Kingdom since mass-rearing methods have not yet been estab- lished. In recent years, the effect of imported A. aphidimyza on aphid populations was evaluated in greenhouses at some Agricultural Experiment Stations in Japan. However, no striking effect has been reported yet from Japan. The failure of its use in Japan seems to be caused chiefly by the lack of detailed ecological or behavioral information of A. aphidimyza. Therefore, we investigated its ecological and behavioral attributes as follows: (1) the survival of pupae in relation to the depth of pupation sites; (2) the time of adult emergence in response to photoperiod during the pupal stage; (3) the importance of a hanging substrate for successful mating; and (4) the influence of adult size and nutrient status on adult longev- ity and fecundity. (1) A commercial natural enemy importer in Japan suggests that users divide cocoons into groups and put each group into a plastic container filled with vermiculite to a depth of 100 mm. However, we believe this is too deep for A. aphidimyza pupae, since under natural conditions mature larvae spin their cocoons in the top few millimeters to a maxmum depth of 30 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccidology. the Study of Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (E-Journal) Revista Corpoica – Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (2008) 9(2), 55-61 RevIEW ARTICLE Coccidology. The study of scale insects (Hemiptera: Takumasa Kondo1, Penny J. Gullan2, Douglas J. Williams3 Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) Coccidología. El estudio de insectos ABSTRACT escama (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: A brief introduction to the science of coccidology, and a synopsis of the history, Coccoidea) advances and challenges in this field of study are discussed. The changes in coccidology since the publication of the Systema Naturae by Carolus Linnaeus 250 years ago are RESUMEN Se presenta una breve introducción a la briefly reviewed. The economic importance, the phylogenetic relationships and the ciencia de la coccidología y se discute una application of DNA barcoding to scale insect identification are also considered in the sinopsis de la historia, avances y desafíos de discussion section. este campo de estudio. Se hace una breve revisión de los cambios de la coccidología Keywords: Scale, insects, coccidae, DNA, history. desde la publicación de Systema Naturae por Carolus Linnaeus hace 250 años. También se discuten la importancia económica, las INTRODUCTION Sternorrhyncha (Gullan & Martin, 2003). relaciones filogenéticas y la aplicación de These insects are usually less than 5 mm códigos de barras del ADN en la identificación occidology is the branch of in length. Their taxonomy is based mainly de insectos escama. C entomology that deals with the study of on the microscopic cuticular features of hemipterous insects of the superfamily Palabras clave: insectos, escama, coccidae, the adult female.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SCALE INSECT GENUS CHIONASPIS : a REVISED CONCEPT (HOMOPTERA : COCCOIDEA : Title DIASPIDIDAE)
    THE SCALE INSECT GENUS CHIONASPIS : A REVISED CONCEPT (HOMOPTERA : COCCOIDEA : Title DIASPIDIDAE) Author(s) Takagi, Sadao Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 33, 1- Citation 77 Issue Date 1985-11 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/9832 Type bulletin (article) File Information 33_p1-77.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 33 NOVEMBER 1985 THE SCALE INSECT GENUS CHIONASPIS: A REVISED CONCEPT (HOMOPTERA: COCCOIDEA: DIASPIDIDAE) By SADAO TAKAGI Research Trips for Agricultural and Forest Insects in the Subcontinent of India (Grants-in-Aid for Overseas Scientific Survey, Ministry of Education, Japanese Government, 1978, No_ 304108; 1979, No_ 404307; 1983, No_ 58041001; 1984, No_ 59043001), Scientific Report No_ 21. Scientific Results of the Hokkaid6 University Expeditions to the Himalaya_ Abstract TAKAGI, S_ 1985_ The scale insect genus Chionaspis: a revised concept (Homoptera: Coc­ coidea: Diaspididae)_ Ins_ matsum_ n_ s. 33, 77 pp., 7 tables, 30 figs. (3 text-figs., 27 pis.). The genus Chionaspis is revised, and a modified concept of the genus is proposed. Fifty-nine species are recognized as members of the genus. All these species are limited to the Northern Hemisphere: many of them are distributed in eastern Asia and North America, and much fewer ones in western Asia and the Mediterranean Region. In Eurasia most species have been recorded from particular plants and many are associated with Fagaceae, while in North America polyphagy is rather prevailing and the hosts are scattered over much more diverse plants. In the number and arrangement of the modified macroducts in the 2nd instar males many eastern Asian species are uniform, while North American species show diverse patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) in the Entomological Collection of the Zoology Research Group, University of Silesia in Katowice (DZUS), Poland
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 70 (2): 281–315 ISSN 2190–7307 2021 · Bugaj-Nawrocka A. et al. http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2021.70.2.281 Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DAB40723-C66E-4826-A8F7-A678AFABA1BC Scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) in the entomological collection of the Zoology Research Group, University of Silesia in Katowice (DZUS), Poland Agnieszka Bugaj-Nawrocka1, *, Łukasz Junkiert2, Małgorzata Kalandyk-Kołodziejczyk3 & Karina Wieczorek4 1, 2, 3, 4 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Bankowa 9, PL-40-007 Katowice, Poland * Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:B5A9DF15-3677-4F5C-AD0A-46B25CA350F6 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:AF78807C-2115-4A33-AD65-9190DA612FB9 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:600C5C5B-38C0-4F26-99C4-40A4DC8BB016 4 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:95A5CB92-EB7B-4132-A04E-6163503ED8C2 Abstract. Information about the scientific collections is made available more and more often. The digitisation of such resources allows us to verify their value and share these records with other scientists – and they are usually rich in taxa and unique in the world. Moreover, such information significantly enriches local and global knowledge about biodiversi- ty. The digitisation of the resources of the Zoology Research Group, University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland) allowed presenting a substantial collection of scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha). The collection counts 9369 slide-mounted specimens, about 200 alcohol-preserved samples, close to 2500 dry specimens stored in glass vials and 1319 amber inclu- sions representing 343 taxa (289 identified to species level), 158 genera and 36 families (29 extant and seven extinct).
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]